Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subject: Camel slaughter, and their meat isn’t halal, instead haram.
Reference:
Ritual Slaughter: Meat of Camel, not hygienic for human consumption as food -
Ritual slaughter is slaughter done according to the religious requirements of
either the Jewish (sachet) or Muslim (Halal) and Hindu (Jhatka) religious faith.
The animal is slaughtered, with / without being stunned, with a razor-sharp
knife. When the cut is done correctly, the animal appears not to feel it. From
an animal welfare standpoint, the major concerns during ritual slaughter are
the stressful and cruel methods of restraint (holding) that are used in some
plants. Progressive slaughter plants use devices to hold the animal in a com-
fortable, upright position. For both humane and safety reasons, plants which
conduct ritual slaughter should install modern upright restraining equipment.
The census of livestock in Delhi or any region is typically conducted for administra-
tive and statistical purposes to understand the population, demographics, and over-
all management of animals. It doesn't directly relate to the permission or regulations
regarding animal slaughtering for domestic consumption or export.
3
In India, regulations concerning the slaughter of animals for meat consumption and
export are governed by various laws and regulations, including state-specific rules
and national legislation like the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the
Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
Each state in India might have its own regulations regarding the slaughter of animals
for consumption and export. Additionally, regulations concerning the export of meat
products outside India also involve compliance with international standards and
agreements.
The slaughtering of animals for domestic consumption or export, especially for com-
mercial gain and profit, is subject to specific rules, licenses, and compliance with
animal welfare and food safety standards. These regulations aim to ensure humane
treatment of animals, hygienic slaughtering practices, and compliance with export
requirements.
The permissions and legality of slaughtering animals for consumption and export
can be complex and subject to various regulations, so it's essential to consult the
specific laws and regulations in Delhi or the concerned region for accurate and de-
tailed information.
Greetings,
(a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the Na-
tional Flag, and the National Anthem.
(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle
for freedom.
(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India.
(d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do
so.
(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the
people of India transcending religious, linguistic, and regional or sectional di-
versities, to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.
(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, riv-
ers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures.
(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and re-
form.
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence.
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activ-
ity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and
achievement.
(k) who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his
child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years.
and hygiene standards rather than religious or cultural practices related to animal
slaughter.
Regarding stunning before animal slaughtering, while the FSSAI regulations empha-
size standards for the hygiene and safety of food processing, they might not specif-
ically mandate stunning before slaughter. The regulations primarily focus on ensur-
ing that food businesses maintain hygienic conditions, follow good manufacturing
practices, and meet safety standards during various stages of food processing, in-
cluding animal slaughter.
However, specific requirements or regulations related to stunning before animal
slaughtering might exist at the state or local level, and these could potentially con-
flict with traditional halal practices. In such cases, there might be discussions or
debates between religious practices and food safety regulations.
It's essential to review both the FSSAI regulations and any additional local or state
regulations that might specifically address stunning before animal slaughter to get
a comprehensive understanding of the legal requirements and their implications on
religious or cultural practices related to animal slaughter in India.
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2001, which were
amended in 2010, include provisions that mandate stunning before animal slaugh-
tering in India. These rules were put in place to ensure the humane treatment of
animals during slaughter and are aimed at improving animal welfare standards in
slaughterhouses.
The amended rules include guidelines for the proper handling and slaughter of ani-
mals in registered slaughterhouses. Among the provisions is the requirement for
stunning animals before slaughter to minimize suffering and ensure a more humane
process.
However, these regulations might conflict with traditional halal methods that empha-
size specific religious practices during animal slaughter, where stunning before
slaughter is not part of the process.
This requirement has led to debates and discussions within religious communities,
particularly among those following Islamic dietary laws, as stunning before slaugh-
ter might not align with their religious practices.
The implementation and adherence to these rules can vary across regions and
slaughterhouses in India. While the rules aim to improve animal welfare, they can
pose challenges for communities that follow specific religious guidelines for animal
slaughter.
As per Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006:
Section 29: Authorities responsible for enforcement of Act.
(1) The Food Authority and the State Food Safety Authorities shall be responsible
for the enforcement of this Act.
(2) The Food Authority and the State Food Safety Authorities shall monitor and verify
that the relevant requirements of law are fulfilled by food business operators at all
stages of food business.
6
(3) The authorities shall maintain a system of control and other activities as appro-
priate to the circumstances, including public communication on food safety and
risk, food safety surveillance and other monitoring activities covering all stages of
food business.
(4) The Food Safety Officers shall enforce and execute within their area the provi-
sions of this Act with respect to which the duty is not imposed expressly or by nec-
essary implication on some other authority.
(5) The regulations under this Act shall specify which of the Food Safety Officers are
to enforce and execute them, either generally or in relation to cases of a particular
description or a particular area, and any such regulations or orders may provide for
the giving of assistance and information by any authority concerned in 11the admin-
istration of the regulations or orders, or of any provisions of this Act, to any other
authority so concerned, for the purposes of their respective duties under them.
(6) The Commissioner of Food Safety and Designated Officer shall exercise the same
powers as are conferred on the Food Safety Officer and follow the same procedure
specified in this Act.
Section 89: Overriding effect of this Act over all other food related laws-
The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent
therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument
having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act.
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2001, amended 2010:
Rule 6. Slaughter –
(1) No animal shall be slaughtered in a slaughter house in sight of other ani-
mals
(2) No animal shall be administered any chemical, drug or hormone before
slaughter except drug for its treatment for any specific disease or ailment.
(3) The slaughter halls in a slaughter house shall provide separate sections of
adequate dimensions sufficient for slaughter of individual animals to ensure
that the animal to be slaughtered is not within the sight of other animals.
(4) Every slaughter house as soon as possible shall provide a separate space
for stunning of animals prior to slaughter, bleeding and dressing of the car-
casses
(5) Knocking section in slaughter house may be so planned as to suit the an-
imal and particularly the ritual slaughter; if any and such knocking section
and dry landing area associated with it shall be so built that escape from this
section can be easily carried out by an operator without allowing the animal
to pass the escape barrier.
(6) A curbed-in bleeding area of adequate size as specified by the Central Gov-
ernment shall be provided in a slaughter house and it shall be so located that
the blood could not be splashed on other animals being slaughtered or on the
carcass being skinned.
(7) The blood drain and collection in a slaughter house shall be immediate and
proper
7
(8) A floor wash point shall be provided in a slaughter house for intermittent
cleaning and a hand-wash basin and knife sterilizer shall also be provided for
the sticker to sterilize knife and wash his hands periodically.
(9) Dressing of carcasses in a slaughter house shall not be done on floor and
adequate means and tools for dehiding or belting of the animals shall be pro-
vided in a slaughter house with means for immediate disposal of hides or
skins;
(10) Hides or skins shall be immediately transported from a slaughter house
either in a closed wheelbarrow or by a chute provided with self-closing door
and in no case, such hides or skins shall be spread on slaughter floor for
inspection
(11) Floor wash point and adequate number of hand wash basins with sterlizer
shall be provided in a dressing area of a slaughter house with means for im-
mediate disposal of legs, horns, hooves and other parts of animals through
spring load floor chutes or sidewall doors or closed wheelbarrows and in case
wheelbarrows or trucks are used in a slaughter house, care shall be taken that
no point wheelbarrow or truck has to ply under the dressing rails and a clear
passage is provided for movement of the trucks.
12. Adequate space and suitable and properly located facilities shall be pro-
vided sufficient for inspection of the viscera of the various types of animals
slaughtered in a slaughter house and it shall have adequate facilities for hand
washing, tool sterilisation and floor washing and contrivances for immediate
separation and disposal of condemned material.
13. Adequate arrangements shall be made in a slaughter house by its owner
for identification, inspection and correlation of carcass, viscera and head.
14. In a slaughter house, a curbed and separately drained area or an area of
sufficient size, sloped 33 mm per metre to a floor drain, where the carcasses
may be washed with a jet of water, shall be provided by the owner of such
slaughter house.
Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regu-
lations, 2011:
Rule 4.0 Slaughter:
Animals are slaughtered by being first stunned and then exsanguinated (bled out).
Stunning can be affected through asphyxiating the animals with carbon dioxide,
shooting them with a gun or a captive bolt pistol, or shocking them with electric
current.
Rule 4.1. Stunning:
Stunning before slaughter should be mandatory. By inducing unconsciousness and
insensibility, stunning can avoid and minimise reactions of fear and anxiety as well
as pain, suffering and distress among the animals concerned. Stunning methods
induce temporary loss of consciousness and rely on prompt and accurate sticking
procedures to cause death.
8
It is important that the equipment utilized for stunning and slaughter is maintained
in good working condition and that all operators involved are well trained and have
a positive attitude towards the welfare of animals.
Electrical stunning consists of passing electricity through the brain to produce in-
stantaneous insensibility.
Veterinary Council of India Standard of Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Code of
Ethics, for Veterinary Practitioners Regulations, 1992:
Rule 3: Declaration and oath by a veterinarian: Being admitted to the profession of
veterinary medicine:
1. I solemnly swear to use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of
society through the protection of animal health, the relief of animal suffering,
the conservation of livestock resources, the promotion of public health, and
the advancement of knowledge in veterinary science.
2. I shall practice my profession conscientiously, with dignity, and in keeping
with the principles of veterinary medical ethics.
3. I accept as a lifelong obligation the continuous improvement of my profes-
sional knowledge and competence.
FIR may be lodged against the operators and promoters of the Jagdish Cold Store,
with public servants of Prevention of Food Adultration, for the violation of many
legislations, breaching public trust, for gain and profit.
1. Confiscate all objectionable materials, freezing all transactions, bank ac-
counts, movable and immovable assets, including passports.
2. Ban all materials on internet, including website, if any.
Restoration of five freedoms for animals, preventing halal certification, and export.
It would be pertinent to mention here that:
Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960: Treating animals cruelly,
If any person-
9
Distribution:
1. APEDA.
2. FSSAI.
3. AWBI.
Witness:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
FORM B
To
Certified that I Mansi Rastogi duly appointed under the provisions of food safety and standards Act, 2006 (34 of 2006); for Eko Pro Engineers Private Limited,
Ghaziabad, received from CFSO/TO, FSSAI NR a sample of Tap Water bearing Code Number and Serial Number DMN/Sur/Del/2023/01 of Designated Officer of Delhi &
Chandigarh on 06/12/2023 for analysis.
The condition of seals on the container and the outer covering of receipt was as follows:
Sample was enclosed in Plastic and Glass Bottle.
I found the sample to be Beverages, (Other than Dairy and Fruits & Vegetable based) falling under Regulation No 2.10.9/FSSR-2011 /IS: 10500-2012
of food safety and standards (food product & food additives) Regulations, 2011.
.
The sample was in a condition fit for analysis and has been analysed on 06/12/2023 to 27/12/2023 and the results of its analysis is given below
Analysis Report
Tap Water
1. Sample Description
6 Total Hardness (as CaCO3), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-21) 740.0 200.0 600.0
7 Calcium (as Ca), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-40) 177.6 75.0 200.0
8 Chloride (as Cl), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-32) 679.8 250.0 1000.0
9 Residual Free Chlorine , mg/L IS: 3025 (P-26) ND(LOQ-0.1) 0.2 1.0
10 Chloramines (as Cl2), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-26) ND(LOQ-1.0) 4.0 No relaxation
12 Total Dissolved Solids , mg/L IS: 3025 (P-16) 2386.0 500.0 2000.0
13 Magnesium (as Mg), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-46) 72.77 30.0 100.0
14 Copper (as Cu), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.05 1.5
15 Sulphate (as SO4), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-24) 410.5 200.0 400.0
16 Nitrate (as NO3), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-34) 10.4 45.0 No relaxation
18 Mercury (as Hg), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.001) 0.001 No relaxation
19 Selenium (as Se), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.05) 0.01 No relaxation
20 Arsenic (as As), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.01 No relaxation
21 Cyanide (as CN), mg/L APHA 4500 CN-K Absent 0.05 No relaxation
22 Lead (as Pb), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.01 No relaxation
23 Zinc (as Zn), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.01) 5.0 15.0
24 Barium (as Ba), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.7 No relaxation
27 Iron (as Fe), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.01) 1.0 No relaxation
28 Molybdenum (as Mo) , mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ- 0.005) 0.07 No relaxation
29 Silver (as Ag), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.1 No relaxation
30 Total Chromium (as Cr), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.05 No relaxation
31 Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-23) 488.0 200.0 600.0
32 Manganese (as Mn), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.1 0.3
33 Aluminium (as Al), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.03 0.2
34 Boron (as B), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-57) ND(LOQ-0.25) 0.5 2.4
35 Cadmium (as Cd), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.001) 0.003 No relaxation
37 Sulphide (as H2S), mg/L IS: 3025 (P-29) ND(LOQ-0.05) 0.05 No relaxation
38 Nickel (as Ni), mg/L APHA 3125 B-23rd 2017 ND(LOQ-0.005) 0.02 No relaxation
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
41 Alachlor, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 20.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
42 Atrazine, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 2.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
43 Aldrin/Dieldrin, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 0.03 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
44 Alpha HCH, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 0.01 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
45 Beta HCH, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 0.04 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
46 Butachlor, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 125.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
47 Chlorpyriphos, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 30.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
48 Delta HCH, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 0.04 No relaxation
/W-01
DDT(o,p and p,p-Isomers of DDT,DDE EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
49 ND(LOQ-0.01) 1.0 No relaxation
and DDD, µg/l /W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
51 Ethion, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 3.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
52 Gamma-HCH (Lindane), µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 2.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
53 Malathion, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 190.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
54 Methyl parathion, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 0.3 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
55 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 30.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
56 Isoproturon, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 9.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
57 Monocrotophos, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 1.0 No relaxation
/W-01
EKO/CHEM/SOP/GCMSMS
58 Phorate, µg/l ND(LOQ-0.01) 2.0 No relaxation
/W-01
FORM VII A
Report of the Food Analyst
Report No. : DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/58
F('6593
Certified that I, Ms. Shradha Tiwari, (Food Analyst) duly appointed under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards
Act, 2006 (34 of 2006); for FARE LABS Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon (FL/FA/06122023-002 and TC5503 23 0 00071996 F),
received from, Central Food Safety Officer FSSAI, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Gov. of India,
Northern Region C/O 2 Floor, NFL, Ahinsa Kahand 2, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, of Uttar Pradesh one sample
of Raw Mutton Mince (Packed) bearing Code and Serial Number DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/58 of Central Food Safety
Officer of area Ghaziabad, U.P. received on 06/12/2023 for analysis.
The Conditions of Seals on the Plastic Bag and the outer covering on receipt were as follows -:
The sample was properly sealed & I found that the seal was intact and unbroken. The seal fixed on the Plastic Bag
and outer cover of the sample and tallied with the specimen impression of the seal separately sent by the Central Food
Safety Officer FSSAI.
I found the sample was to be Raw Mutton Mince falling under the Regulation Number 2.5.2.10 (Fresh or Chilled or
Frozen Mutton or Sheep Meat) of Food Safety and standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives)
Regulation, 2011. The sample was in a condition Fit for Analysis & has been analyzed on 06/12/2023 to 011/12/2023
& the results of its analysis is given below:
Sample Description: Raw Mutton Mince (Packed) packed in a Plastic Bag with Serial Number
DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/58
Labeling Requirements:
Page 1 of 6
_1
Prescribed Standards as
per: - Food Safety and
Nature of
SI. Quality Standards (Food Products
method of test Result
No. Characteristics Standards and Food
used
Additives) Regulations,
2011
Moisture, % by wt. AOAC 950.46 56.40 68-72
2 Fat, % by wt. AOAC 960.39 1.00 4-10
Protein, % by wt. IS 5960 (P-i) 17.83 20-22
Prescribed Standards as
Nature of per: - Food Safety and
S. No. Quality Characteristics method of test Result Standards (Contaminants,
used Toxins and Residues)
Resulations 2011
Metal Contaminants:
1. Lead, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 0.1 -
2. Arsenic, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 1.1 -
3. Tin, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 0.78 NMT 250
4. Cadmium, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 1.5
5. Copper, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 4.68 NMT 30
6. Mercury, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02J NMT 1.0
Methyl Mercury FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 0.25
7. Calculated as element,
mg/kg
Naturally occurring toxic substances:
8. Saifrole, mg/kg FL/SOP/GC-28 ND, [DL-1] NMT 10
Pesticide residues (mg/kg):
2,4-Dichiorophenoxy FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.2
Acetic Acid
10. Acephate FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.O1] NMT 0.05
j.j.. Acetamiprid FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.05
12. benomyl FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.1
13. Bitertanol FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.0iJ NMT 0.05
14. Carbendazim FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMTO.i
15. Carbofuran FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.1
16. Chlorantraniliprole FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.2
17. Chlorothalonil FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.02
18. Chlorpyriphos FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.0iJ NMT 0.1
19. Chlothianidin FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01} NMT 0.02
20. Cypermethrin FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 2
21. Deltamethrin FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, {LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.5
22. Difenoconazole FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.2
23. Dimethoate FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.05
24. Mancozeb as CS2 FL/SOP/GCMS/P-18 BLQ, [LOQ-0.03] NMT 0.1
Ft./ If GEN IF-OS
Page 2 of 6
P FARELABS
Science I Technology I Innovation
Unit-I
L-1713, DLF Phase-Il, IFFCO Chowk,
MG. Road, Gurugram - 122 002, Haryana, INDIA.
Tel. : +91-124-4223207-08, 4034205 I Cell +91-9289351688
Email farelabs@farelabs.com I Website : www.farelabs.com
TC-5503
Page 3 of 6
TC'-5503
Page 4 of 6
CS tC-5503
Page 5 of 6
T('-5503
Prescribed Standards as
per: - Appendix B: Table
Nature of
5; Microbiological
S. No. Quality Characteristics method of test Result
Requirements (Microbial
used
Standards for Meat and
Meat Products)
Staphylococcus aureus:
i-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
21.
positive), cfu/g
2-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
22.
positive), cfu/g
3-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
23. IS 5887 (P-8) 5 2 1x102 1x103
positive), cfu/g
4-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
24.
positive), cfu/g
5-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
25.
positive), cfu/g
Salmonella:
26. 1-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
27. 2-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
IS 5887 (P-3):
28. 3-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent 5 0 Absent
Sec-i
29. 4-Salmonella sp., per 25g - Absent
30. 5-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
Aerobic Plate count:
31. 1- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 84000
32. 2- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 56000
33. 3- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g IS 5402 (P-i) 46000 5 2 ixiO5 5x106
34. 4- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 87000
35. 5- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 44000
Yeast and Mold Count:
36. 1- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g <10
37. 2- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g <10
38. 3- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g IS 5403 <10 5 2 1x104 5x104
39. 4- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g <10
40. 5- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g <10
ODinion: The tested sample of Raw Mutton Mince does not conform to sub regulation 2.5.2.10 (Fresh or Chilled or Frozen Mutton
or Sheep Meat) and Appendix B (Microbial Standards for Meat and Meat Products (Table 5)) of Food Safety and Standards (Food
Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011. The parameters on which the sample does not conform to these
Regulations are in bold. The Sample of Raw Mutton Mince is 'unsafe' as defined under Section 3(1) (zz) of Food Safety and
Standards Act, 2006.
Page 6 of 6
FORM VII A
Report of the Food Analyst
Report No. : DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/57
certified that I, Ms. Shradha Tiwari, (Food Analyst) duly appointed under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards
Act, 2006 (34 of 2006); for FARE LABS Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon (FL/FA/06122023-001 and 105503 23 0 00071995 F),
received from Central Food Safety Officer FSSAI, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Gov. of India,
Northern Region C/O 2nd Floor, NFL, Ahinsa Kahand 2, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, of Uttar Pradesh one sample
of Unidentified Raw Meat bearing code and Serial Number DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/57 of central Food Safety
Officer of area Ghaziabad, UP. received on 06/12/2023 for analysis.
The Conditions of Seals on the Plastic Bag and the outer covering on receipt were as follows -:
The sample was properly sealed & I found that the seal was intact and unbroken. The seal fixed on the Plastic Bag
and outer cover of the sample and tallied with the specimen impression of the seal separately sent by the central Food
Safety Officer FSSAI.
I found the sample to be Unidentified Raw Meat falling under the Sub Regulation Number 2.5 (Meat and Meat
Product) of Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulation, 2011. The sample
was in a condition Fit for Analysis & has been analyzed on 06/12/2023 to 011/12/2023 & the results of its analysis is
given below:
Sample Description: Unidentified Raw Meat packed in a Plastic Bag with sample no. DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/57
Labeling Requirements:
Page 1 of 6
Prescribed Standards as
per: - Food Safety and
Nature of
SI. Quality Standards (Food Products
method of test Result
No. Characteristics Standards and Food
used
Additives) Regulations,
2011
1 Moisture, % by wt. AOAC 950.46 69.58 Not Specified
2 Fat, % by wt. AOAC 960.39 10.39 Not Specified
3 Protein, % by wt. Is 5960 (P-i) 39.69 Not Specified
Prescribed Standards as
Nature of per: - Food Safety and
S. No. Quality Characteristics method of test Result Standards (Contaminants,
used Toxins and Residues)
Regulations, 2011
Metal Contaminants:
1. Lead, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 0.1
2. Arsenic, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 1.1
3. Tin, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPM5-06 1.14 NMT 250
4. Cadmium, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 1.5
5. Copper, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 3.56 NMT 30
6. Mercury, mg/kg FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02} NMT 1.0
Methyl Mercury FL/SOP/ICPMS-06 ND, [LOQ-0.02] NMT 0.25
7. Calculated as element,
mg/kg
Naturally occurring toxic substances:
8. Saffrole, mg/kg FL/SOP/GC-28 ND, [DL-1] NMT 10
Pesticide residues (mg/kg):
2,4-Dichiorophenoxy FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.2
Acetic Acid
10. Acephate FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.05
11. Acetamiprid FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.05
12. benomyl FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.1
13. Bitertanol FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01J NMT 0.05
14. Carbendazim FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMTO.1
15. Carbofuran FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.1
16. Chlorantraniliprole FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01J NMT 0.2
17. Chlorothalonil FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.02
18. Chlorpyriphos FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.1
19. Chlothianidin FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-O.01] NMT 0.02
20. Cypermethrin FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 2
21. Deltamethrin FL/SOP/GCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.5
22. Difenoconazole FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.2
23. Dimethoate FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01J NMT 0.05
24. Mancozeb as CS2 FL/SOP/GCMS/P-18 BLQ, [LOQ-0.03] NMT 0.1
25. Edifenphos FL/SOP/LCMS/P-06 BLQ, [LOQ-0.01] NMT 0.02
Page 2 of 6
iC-co3
Page 3 of 6
IC-5U3
Page 4 of 6
I(5O3
Page 5 of 6
IC-5593
Prescribed Standards as
per: - Appendix B: Table
Nature of
5; Microbiological
S. No. Quality Characteristics method of test Result
Requirements (Microbial
used
Standards for Meat and
Meat Products)
Staphylococcus aureus:
l-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
21.
positive), cfu/g
2-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
22.
positive), cfu/g
3-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
23. IS 5887 (P-8) 5 2 ixl0 1x102
positive), cfu/g
4-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
24.
positive), cfu/g
5-S.aureus (Coagulase <10
25.
positive), cfu/g -
Salmonella:
26. 1-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
27. 2-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
IS 5887 (P-3): Absent
28. 3-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent 5 0
Sec-i
29. 4-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
30. 5-Salmonella sp., per 25g Absent
Aerobic Plate count:
31. 1- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 8.5x107
32. 2- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 3.8x106
33. 3- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g IS 5402 (P-i) 4.2x107 5 2 1x105 5x105
34. 4- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 1.2x108
35. 5- Aerobic Plate count, cfu/g 1.7x 10
Yeast and Mold Count:
36. 1- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g 3800
37. 2- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g 1600
38. 3- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g IS 5403 3400 5 2 1x103 1x104
39. 4- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g 3200
40. 5- Yeast & Mould Count, cfu/g 2200
ODinion: The tested sample of Unidentified Raw Meat does not conform to Appendix B (Microbial Standards for Meat
and Meat Products (Table 5)) of Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations,
2011. The parameters on which the sample does not conform to these Regulations are in bold. The Sample of
Unidentified Raw Meat is 'unsafe' as defined under Section 3(1) (zz) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
FL/ T/ GEN/ F-05
Page 6 of 6
To
I Mansi Rastogi (Food Analyst) duly appointed under the provisional of food safety and standards Act, 2006 (34 of 2006); for Eko Pro Engineers Private
Limited, Ghaziabad (EKO/F-001/041223) Certified that , (name of the local area/name of the port) received from CFSO/TO,FSSAI NR sample of Unidentified
Raw Meat bearing Code Number and Serial Number DLI-DMN/FSSAI/2023/54 of Designated Officer/Authorised Officer of Delhi & Chandigarh on 04/12/2023 (date
of receipt of sample) for analysis.
The condition of seals on the container and the outer covering of receipt was as follows:
Sample was enclosed in Polybag
I found that the sample Unidentified Raw Meat to be (category of the sample-Meat & Meat Products/Sub-category-Fresh and frozen meat and eggs) falling
under Regulation No 2.5.2 of food safety and standards (food product & food additives) Regulations, 2011.
.
The sample was Unidentified Raw Meat in a condition fit for analysis and has been analysed on 04/12/2023 to 12/12/2023 and the results of its analysis is
Given below:
Page : 1
Name of the Method Specification
S No. Quality Characteristics Results
used 2.5.2/FSSR-2011
Heavy Metals:
Pesticide Residues:
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy Acetic
1 EKO/CHEM/SOP/FL-062 ND(LOQ-0.01) Max.0.2
Acid,mg/kg
Page : 2
17 Mancozeb,mg/kg as CS2 EKO/CHEM/SOP/FL-060 ND(LOQ-0.01) Max.0.1
Page : 3
7 Oxytetracycline, mg/kg EKO/CHEM/SOP/FL-026 ND(LOQ-0.005) Max.0.2
Page : 4
38 Sulfadimidine,mg/kg EKO/CHEM/SOP/FL-026 ND(LOQ-0.005) Max.0.1
Page : 5
Result Specification
Quality Name of the Method
S No. 2.5.2/FSSR-
Characteristics Used Bag 1 Bag 2 Bag 3 Bag 4 Bag 5
2011
Microbiology:
1. APC, cfu/gm IS: 5402 TNTC TNTC 1.0x107 TNTC TNTC NMT 5×106
2. E.coli, cfu/gm IS: 5887(P-1) TNTC 4.0x105 1.2x107 1.3x106 3.0x104 NMT 1×102
3. S.aureus, cfu/gm IS: 5887(P-2) < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 NMT 1×103
Salmonella
4. IS: 5887 (P-3) Present Present Present Present Present Absent
/25gm
Yeast & Mould,
5. IS: 5403 TNTC 4.9X105 1.5X106 TNTC 5.8X107 NMT 5X104
cfu/gm
Opinion: The sample of Unidentified Raw Meat (ULR No-TC506323000004906F) does not conform to the standard laid down under Regulation No.
2.5.2 of Food safety & standards (Food Products standard & Food Additives) Regulation, 2011, as the sample shows presence of APC, E.coli,
Salmonella & Yeast & Mould above the maximum prescribed limit. The sample is thus unsafe under section 3(I)(zz)(xi) of FSS Act, 2006.
Page : 6
Naresh Kadyan,
Master Trainer in Animal Welfare to Govt. of India
Retired Commissioner (Headquarter),
Bharat Scouts and Guides, Haryana.
Founder Scouts and Guides for Animals
and Birds / OIPA: Indian People for
Animals
C- 38, Rose Apartment, sector- 14, Rohini,
Delhi- 110085.
Let live and live