MSc Contemporary Health & Social Care Policy

City University
Masters in Health Management –
Imperial College Tanaka Business School
 ,

.
.
/
 ( ,
– )
( ,
, –
)
(
,
, )
 100% 21,0
19,5
17,8 20
37,7%
37,8%
80% 39,4% 35,3% 37,1%
39,1% 37,4% 15,3
14,8 36,9%
13,6 15
12,5
60% 62,9%
10,6

.€
64,7% 10
40%
63,1%
62,6% 62,3%
60,9% 60,6% 62,2% 5
20%

0% 0
2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007*

:
*

25 ,
 % , 2007

45%
39,7%
40%

35%

30% 28,2%
25,4%
25% 23,6% 23,5% 23,7%
23,1%
21,0%
20%
19,3%
15%

10%

5%

0%

*
: OECD Health Data 2009
 , &

25 250
228
213
198 21,0
20 186 19,5 200
171 17,8
157
146 15,3
126 136 14,8
15 13,6 150
118
.€

109 12,5

.€
10,9 10,6
9,9
10 9,2 100

4,5
5 3,8 50
2,7 3,1
1,9 1,9 2,1 2,5
1,5 1,4 1,6

0 0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007*

( ) ( )
( )

:
*
 .

1 ,
2 – ,
3 ,
4 .
1.
2.
3.
 .

,
, ,
,

,
,
.
 Beveridge,
.

, -

.
 ,
–
,
-
.
 ,

.
,

.
,

Bismark
Bismark..
• (
)
•

•
•

•
•
•
• ,

• ,
 -
,

.
 –
,

.
 ,

.
, , 1996)
 -

-
 –

. –

.
.
. –

:
.
.
:
,
.
.
.
.

:
,

( .):

,
.
((R.S.C.)
R.S.C.)::

.
80% .
.

:
, .
:
((fee
fee for service
service))
 ((per
per diem)

- ,
(
).
 ((per
per diem)

, ,
, , ,
, .
 ((per
per diem)

.
, ( )

.
 ((per
per diem)

. ( -)
, ( . )

. ,

.
 1979

,
.
,

.
 .

.
1.

.
2.
,

»( )

.
 (
)
,

- .
,
,
,
,
,

.
 (
)

(fee
(fee for service)
( DRGs)
DRGs),, ,
,
(
),
.

.
 (Diagnosis Related
Groups DRGs)
 DRGs
DRGs

, ,

,
.

’
.
 DRGs

.
.

,
.

,
’ .
 DRGs

– .

.
 DRGs

,
.
 DRGs
DRGs
–
.

.
 DRGs
–

.
 DRGs
DRGs
,
( , )
,

, ,
, .

.
 DRGs

: ,
, , , ,
.
,

,
, ,
, .
 DRGs
:
1.
2.
3.
4.

(PROs),
((medical
medical
audit) ((utilization
utilization
review)..
review)
-

.
,

,
.
 DRGs
14%
,
.

Medicare.
Medicare.

Medicare 40%
 DRGs

.
,
.

,
.

,
 DRGs
,

.
,

,
–
–
 ,

.
’80,

» ( ,
, , , , ,
, , ).
« »
.
 –

)
 – /

– .

,
– /

,
,

,
.
 (
)

, DRGs
 ,
.

,
.

(soft
(soft budget)
budget)

.
–
/

,
 (

,
 (
)

– –
(
)
 (
, )
Benchmarking

( )
–
( )
,
10
Bismark Beveridge

- ( ( )
)

&

, ( ,
. , )
,

. . ,

& .
 4
1.
2.
3.

4.
10
 10

..
 –

»
 .

.
 ,
,
.

.
 .

:
1.

2.

.
 .

:
•
•
•

:
(cost minimization analysis)
- (cost - effectiveness analysis)
- (cost - utility analysis)
- (cost - benefit analysis)
 -

< >

>

<
 ,
.

( .
), ( .

).
1 ,

.
 (technical
(technical efficiency)

.
.

((allocative
allocative efficiency),
pareto ,
,
,
.

.
,
,

.
, Drummond
, :
 ( .
, ,
)

.
( .
)
 ,
.
(social perspective),
,
( . ,
.)
 (incremental)
(incremental)

.
 .

,
,

( . )
 ((program
program budgeting)
((marginal
marginal analysis)
(PBMA)
(PBMA)

. (PBMA)
(PBMA)
,

. ,

,
.
 ,
,

(
)
:
: Williams - Torrens
 ( ).

( ),
,

).
 ,

.
,

.
 : 24,38%

: 19,50%

: 10% ( ‘60)
: 80% ( ‘90)

= 15 - 20%

= 1% (1984)
=
(1997)
= 40%
1.
.

2. ,
.

3.

(QUALY).

4.
.

5.
.
 ,

!
 ., ., (1991),
, , ,
31.
., ., ., (1996)
, . 161
., ., . (1992)
, ,
1,4, .64
., . (1994),
, ,
& , . 92
Abel – Smith B.
B.,, . (1994)
,
& , , . , .49
!