Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solaroperatedaerator
Solaroperatedaerator
net/publication/332751701
CITATIONS READS
0 3,119
3 authors:
Amitava Dey
ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region
98 PUBLICATIONS 655 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Kamal Sarma on 30 April 2019.
ABSTRACT : A study was conducted to see the impact of a sprinkling type solar aerator on dissolved oxygen ‘DO) concentration
of pond water and the growth and survival of rohu (Labeo rohita). The aerator is made of 750W DC induction motor energized
by 900Wp solar array. Results revealed that use of a solar aerator can enhance overall oxygen reserve in the pond by 26.1
percent compared to the control. The growth performance of rohu in terms of weight gain (p<0.05), percentage weight gain
(p<0.05), percentage specific growth rate and FCR were found to be significantly higher in the aerated pond over the control.
From the present study, it is can be concluded that the use of solar powered aerator is an efficient system for improving dissolved
oxygen level in water thereby increasing growth and survival of fishes.
Key words : Dissolved oxygen, temperature, solar panel, aerator, L. rohita.
Fig. 2 : Comparison dissolved oxygen and temperature between Fig. 3 : Comparison dissolved oxygen and temperature between
treatment and control ponds of the surface water. treatment and control ponds of the Column water.
increased in treatment and control was 60.4% and 33.6% m, moreover DO level near to the pump (0 m) is always
for DO and 1.9% and 2.49% temperature respectively. lower than 10 m. This is mainly because of low DO water
This indicated that aerator facilitate almost 26.8 % higher was constantly getting sucked from the bottom and
DO level from the control pond at the bottom. Percentage sprinkled water was not falling in that area (Fig. 1). In
change in temperature of the bottom was insignificant. case of other water quality parameters like pH, alkalinity
Overall performance of aerator on DO and temperature and hardness, no significant difference (P<0.05) between
in treatment and control pond is illustrated in Fig 5. Here the treatment and control ponds was recorded. The pH
percentage increase was 99.8% and 73.7% in DO and was 7.88± 0.14 and 7.90 ± 0.21, alkalinity was 179.67
3.7% and 5.6% in temperature, respectively. This indicated ±7.26 ppm and 184.50 ± 8.59 ppm and hardness was
that overall DO level in water of the solar operated 157.83 ± 8.12 ppm and 144.00± 4.75 ppm respectively
aerator facilitated around 26.1% higher DO reserve and are within the acceptable limit of fish culture
compared to control pond. operation.
Spatial and diurnal variations of dissolved oxygen level Growth and survival
and water temperature of surface water are illustrated Data pertaining to body weight gain and percentage
in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. It is recorded that DO level survival of L. rohita is illustrated in Fig. 8. From the figure,
at the 10 m from the aerator was better than 15 and 20
1044 Kamal Sarma et al
Fig. 4 : Comparison dissolved oxygen and temperature between Fig. 5 : Overall dissolved oxygen and temperature between
treatment and control ponds of the bottom water. treatment and control ponds.
Fig. 6 : Spatial and diurnal variations of dissolved oxygen level in Fig. 7 : Spatial and diurnal variations of temperature (0C) in the
the treatment pond fitted with solar operated sprinkler. treatment pond fitted with solar operated sprinkler.
Fig. 8 : Average weight gain (g) of L. rohita at the end of 75 days of Fig. 9 : Specific growth rate percentage (SGR%) and percentage
culture. Data are expressed as mean ±SE. Bar with different gain in weight (% gain) of L. rohita at the end of 75 days of
alphabets differ significantly (P<0.05). culture.
it is clear that the average weight gain is maximum 73%. Percentage weight gain in treatment and control
(P<0.05) at aerated pond (treatment) compared to the was 211.4% and 119.8% and the specific growth
control. Similarly the survival percentage was also higher percentage was 1.51% and 1.05%, respectively (Fig. 9).
in treatment pond, i.e., 84% compared to control pond, On the contrary, the feed conversion ratio of aerated pond
Impact of solar operated aerator on dissolved oxygen and fish growth 1045
was lower (1.2) than the control pond (1.75), which was day time, whereas demand of DO is the maximum during
similar to the results obtained by Zhang and Boyd (1988). night hours. Hence, alternative arrangement like charging
This indicated that requirement of feed was lower to a battery using solar panel during day time and using them
achieve higher production in aerated pond compared to at night can be very effective. However, it is costly and
non aerated pond. shall require larger size panel because solar panels
From the study, it revealed that aeration can be a conversion efficiency is still very low (Tanveer and
potential mechanism to enhance the growth and survival Sivakumar, 2016). Hence, more systematic studies may
of rohu. The growth performance of rohu in terms of be initiated so that we can move towards more use of
weight gain, percent weight gain, specific growth rate- green energy, which is more environmental friendly.
which can ultimately translated into higher production- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
were found to be significantly higher (p<0.05) in the pond The authors are thankful to the Director, ICAR
fitted with solar operated sprinkler type of aerator Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna for
(treatment) than the control pond. The higher weight gain, providing facilities to conduct the experiment. Authors
specific growth rate, FCR and survival rate obtained in also express special thanks to Mr. Amrendra Kumar for
the treatment pond of present study compared to non- his help during collection of data.
aerated ponds might be due to higher in DO content,
REFERENCES
better aquatic environment and enhanced efficiency in
feed conversion (Das et al, 2004, Bergheim et al, 2006; Bergheim A, Gausen M, Naess A, Holland P M, Krogedal P and
Crampton V (2006) A newly developed oxygen injection system
Duan et al, 2011, Sultana et al, 2017). Higher survival for cage farms. Aquacult. Eng. 34(1), 40–46.
rate of fish in aerated pond has also been reported by
APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and
several scientists (Hollerman and Boyd, 1980; Das et al, wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association,
2004; Qayyum et al, 2011; Sultana et al, 2017). Thus the Washington
present study indicated that day time aeration also has Boyd C E (1998) Pond water aeration systems. Aquacultural
significant effect on the overall condition and production Engineering 18, 9–40.
of fish. Jana and Sengupta (1992) also reported that day Boyd C E and Lichtkoppler F (1979) Water quality management in
time aeration in fish pond itself significantly enhance total pond fish culture. Research and development series No. 22,
fish production and they attributed that to higher rates of International Center for Aquaculture, Agricultural Experiment
Station, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
net primary productivity of phytoplankton, lowered
Boyd C E and Martinson D J (1984) Evaluation of propeller-aspirator-
ammonium and nitrite values as well as a low N/P ratio.
pump aerators. Aquaculture 36 (3), 283–292.
Modern aquaculture experience suggests that about 2,000
Das P C , Ayyappan S, Jena J K, Singh S K, Patamajhi P and Muduli
kilograms (kg) per ha of most species of shrimp and fish H K (2004) Effect of aeration on production and water quality
can be produced in ponds without aeration while with changes in intensive carp culture. Indian J. Fish. 51(2), 173-183.
proper aeration, it is reasonable to expect a production Duan Y, Dong X, Zhang X and Miao Z (2011) Effects of dissolved
of up to 6,000 kg/ha (Oakes, 2011). Zhang and Boyd oxygen concentration and stocking density on the growth, energy
(1988) reported 31.5% higher fish production in an aerated budget and body composition of juvenile Japanese flounder,
pond while Das et al (2004) reported 42.8% a higher Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck et Schlegel). Aquacult. Res.
42, 407–416.
production in fish pond fitted with mechanical aeration
Hollerman W D and Boyd C E (1980) Nightly aeration trincreeye
than that in control ponds while ensuring good water
production of Channel Catfish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 109, 440-
quality in the ponds. 452.
CONCLUSION Jana B B and Sengupta S (1992) Effect of daytime aeration on the
growth of Indian carp fingerlings. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 8 (1-4), 203-
From the present study, it can be concluded that the
213.
use of solar powered sprinkler type of aerator can be an
Miles N G and West R J (2011) The use of an aeration system to
efficient system for improving dissolved oxygen level in prevent thermal stratification of a freshwater impoundment and
water thereby increasing growth, survival and overall its effect on downstream fish assemblages. Fish Biol. 78, 945–
production of fish. The day time operation increases 952.
oxygen level of water vis-à-vis breaks thermal Oakes P L (2011) Aeration of ponds used in aquaculture. Agricultural
stratification and hence producing uniform dissolved Engineering: Technical Note No. AEN-3. United States
oxygen profile in pond water. The oxygen rich bottom Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington. 15pp.
layers serves as an oxygen reserve for following night. Qayyum A, Ayub M and Tabinda A B (2005) Effect of aeration on
water quality, fish growth and survival in aquaculture ponds.
However, the major limitation of this type of system is
Pakistan J. Zool. 37(1), 75-80.
that solar operated pump can only run only during the
1046 Kamal Sarma et al
Sultana T, Haque M M, Salam M A and Alam M M (2017) Effect of Zhang Lai-Fa and Boyd C E (1988) Nightly aeration to increase the
aeration on growth and production of fish in intensive aquaculture efficiency of channel catfish production. N. Am. J. Aquac. 50
system in earthen ponds. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 15(1), 113– (4), 237-242.
122.
Tanveer M and Sivakumar M (2016) A conceptual approach for
development of solar powered aeration system in aquaculture
farms. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 5 (5), 2921 – 2925.