Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 9 & 10
Final presentation
Instructor: Prof. Azusa Nakamura
Session topics
Week 1: Introduction and Managerial Work Today
Week 2: Design of Work
Week 3: Recruitment, training and development
Week 4: Performance & Reward Management
Week 5: HR Models & Sectorial Variations
Mid-term exam
Peer evaluation
For presenters
Please use your laptop.
Please engage with the entire audience. I'm not the only one
here. :)
If you ask a question to the presenter, you will get a bonus point.
For listeners
Active listening!
When not presenting, you will be assessing other groups via MF
forms. I also sent an email to you this morning.
In case you are presenting, just write down you are a presenter.
Let’s start!
About final exam and final report
The course coordinator informed me yesterday that your exam will be on
December 12!
If I had known this before, I would not set up the deadline for your final report one
week after Session 10.
2 Structuring work
4 Managing flexibility
Scientists in R&D
labs
Strong Horizontal
Strong Vertical
Weak Vertical Specialization
Specialization Weak Horizontal
Specialization
Specialization
Specialize in one
Fixed schedule
area
Coordination Mechanisms
Supervising work
01 Direct supervision
02 Mutual adjustment
03 Process Standarization
04 Qualifications Standardization
05 Results Standardization
06 Norms Standardization
Managing flexibility
Increasing complexity of
managerial work
Increasing diversity of workers -
interns, temporary staff, freelancers,
teleworkers...
More flexible?
More stress?
Forms of flexibility
Performance Appraisals
The result of an annual or biannual process in which a manager
evaluates an employee’s performance relative to the requirements
of his or her job and uses the information to show the person where
improvements are needed and why
Which scale do you like or dislike?
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER:
360-DEGREE APPRAISAL
Advantage:
Ensure anonymity
Make respondents accountable
Prevent “gaming” of the system
Use statistical procedures
Identify and quantify biases
ASSESSMENT BIASES
Halo effect: One criterion influences the evaluation of the overall performance
e.g., my subordinate is super in team A, so this person is for sure good in team B.
Contrast effect: Two employees with different profiles are evaluated one after
the other
Similarity effect: Overrating an employee due to characteristics similar to the
rater
Pichault, F., & Schoenaers, F. (2003). HRM practices in a process of organisational change: A contextualist perspective.
Applied Psychology, 52(1), 120-143.
Sources of power (S7)
Examples?
Coercive Power
Forcing someone to do something he/she does not want to do through the threat of punishment
Reward Power
Control of rewards and monetary resources
Positional Power
Role, position, or title power, like the CEO
Expert Power
Information, knowledge, or expertise
Informational Power
By controlling the flow of information
You can be strategic about which parts you want to focus on.
(5 questions you will select)
Be logical.
Peer evaluation
Thank
!
you !
azusa.nakamura@neoma-bs.fr