Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 6
*6.1 Introduction
6.5 Trade Based on Dynamic Technological Differences and Synthesis of Trade Theories
6.5A The Technological Gap and Product Cycle Models
6.5B Illustration of the Product Cycle Model
Case Study 6-8: The United States as the Most Competitive Economy
KEY TERMS
Differentiated products International economies of scale Offshoring
Dynamic external economies Intra-industry trade Oligopoly
Environmental standards Intra-industry trade index (T) Outsourcing
External economies Learning curve Partial equilibrium analysis
Footloose industries Market-oriented industries Product cycle model
General equilibrium analysis Monopolistic competition Resource-oriented industries
Increasing returns to scale Monopoly Technological gap model
Infant industry argument Nontraded goods and services Transport or logistics costs
Lecture Guide:
1. Sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 are important ones because they present some of the most recent
developments in international trade theory.
2. I would cover sections 1, 2, and 3 in lecture 1. The material is not difficult but very
important. I would also assign problems 1-3.
3. I would cover section 4 in lecture 2. This is the most important section in the chapter. I
would pay very close attention to Figures 6-2 and 6-3. These require reviewing from
principles of economics, the meaning of differentiated products, monopolistic competition,
economies of scale, and the determination of profit maximization by the firm. I would also
assign problems 4 to 9 and go over in class problems 6-9.
Answer to Problems:
1. See Figure 1.
2. See Figure 2.
3. See Figure 3.
4. a) T = 1 - /1000-1000/ = 1 - 0 = 1.
1000+1000 2000
e) T = 1 - /1000-0/ = 1 - 1000 = 0.
1000+0 1000
5. a) T = 1 - /1000-1000/ = 1 - 0 = 1.
1000+1000 2000
e) T = 1 - /0-1000/ = 1 - 1000 = 0.
0+1000 1000
Note that the results are identical to those in Problem 4 because we take the absolute
value of exports minus imports or imports minus exports.
6. See Figure 4.
The AC and the MC curves in Figure 4 are the same as in Figure 6-2. However, D and the
corresponding MR curve are higher on the assumption that other firms have not yet imitated
this firm's product, reduced its market share, or competed this firm's profits away. In Figure
4, MR=MC at point E, so that the best level of output of the firm is 5 units and price is
$4.50. Since at Q=5, AC=$3.00, the firm earns a profit of AB=$2.00 per unit and $10.00
in total.
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 5 Figure 6
8. A perfectly competitive firm faces an infinitely elastic or horizontal demand curve. This
means that the firm is a price taker and can sell any quantity of the homogenous product at
the price determined at the intersection of the market demand and supply curves for the
commodity.
Both the demand curves faced by the monopolistic competitive firm and the monopolist are
downward sloping, indicating that each can sell more units of the commodity by
lowering its price. However, the demand curve facing the monopolistically competitive firm
generally has a smaller inclination (i.e., it is more elastic) than the demand curve facing
the monopolist because the former sells a commodity for which many good substitute are
available.
9. If the C curve had shifted down only half as much as curve C' in Figure 6-3, the new
equilibrium point would be at P=AC=$2.50 and N=350.
11. The increased pirating or production and sale of counterfeit American goods without paying
royalties by foreign producers shorten the U.S. product cycle or the time during which the
U.S. firm can reap the benefits from the new product or technology it introduced and thus
reduces the ability of U.S. firms to engage in research and development (R & D) new
product cycles.
With transportation costs specialization would proceed to point C in Nation 1 and point C’
in Nation 2. Pc in nation 1 (the nation exporting commodity X) is smaller than Pc' in Nation
2 (the country importing commodity X) by the relative cost of transporting each unit of
commodity X from Nation 1 to Nation 2. Trade does not seem to be in
equilibrium because transportation costs are expressed in terms of commodity X.
P2 exceeds P1 by the relative cost of transporting one unit of commodity X from Nation 1
to Nation 2.
The firm's AC=AF without and BC with external economies. Thus, at a given level of
output of the firm, the firm's AC are lower (i.e., the firm's AC curve shifts down) as
cumulative industry output expands.
App. 2. Parameter "a" refers to the starting AC (i.e., the AC when output or Q is zero).
Parameter "b" refers to the rate of decline in AC as cumulative industry output increases.
Thus, "b" should be negative. Furthermore, the larger the absolute value of b, the more
rapid is the decline in AC as cumulative industry expands over time.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9 Figure 10
Multiple-Choice Questions:
2. Which of the following assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory, when relaxed, leave
the theory unaffected?
4. International trade can be based on economies of scale even if both nations have identical:
a. factor endowments
b. tastes
c. technology
*d. all of the above
a. is intra-industry trade
b. involves differentiated products
c. is based on monopolistic competition
*d. all of the above
6. The Heckscher-Ohlin and new trade theories explains most of the trade:
*a. Linder
b. Vernon
c. Leontief
d. Ohlin
9. If a nation exports twice as much of a differentiated product that it imports, its intra-
industry (T) index is equal to:
a. 1.00
b. 0.75
*c. 0.50
d. 0.25
11. Which of the following statements is true with regard to the product-cycle theory?
14. The share of transport costs will fall less heavily on the nation:
*a. with the more elastic demand and supply of the traded commodity
b. with the less elastic demand and supply of the traded commodity
c. exporting agricultural products
d. with the largest domestic market
1. Assume that both the United States and Germany produce beef and computer chips with the
following costs:
United States Germany
(dollars) (marks)
a. What is the opportunity cost of beef (B) and computer chips (C) in each country?
b. In which commodity does the United States have a comparative cost advantage?
What about Germany?
c. What is the range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germany
for each computer chip traded?
d. How much would the United States and Germany gain if 1 unit of beef is exchanged
for 3 chips?
Answer
In Germany:
the opportunity cost of one unit of beef is 4 chips;
the opportunity cost of one chip is 1/4 unit of beef.
b. The United States has a comparative cost advantage in beef with respect to
Germany, while Germany has a comparative cost advantage in computer chips.
c. The range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germany for
each unit of beef that the United States exports is
2C < 1B < 4C
d. Both the United States and Germany would gain 1 chip for each unit of beef traded.
2. Given: (1) two nations (1 and 2) which have the same technology but different factor
endowments and tastes, (2) two commodities (X and Y) produced under increasing costs
conditions, and (3) no transportation costs, tariffs, or other obstructions to trade. Prove
geometrically that mutually advantageous trade between the two nations is possible.
Note: Your answer should show the autarky (no-trade) and free-trade points of
production and consumption for each nation, the gains from trade of each nation, and
express the equilibrium condition that should prevail when trade stops expanding.)
Nations 1 and 2 have different production possibilities curves and different community
indifference maps. With these, they will usually end up with different relative commodity
prices in autarky, thus making mutually beneficial trade possible.
In the figure, Nation 1 produces and consumes at point A and Px/Py=PA in autarky, while
Nation 2 produces and consumes at point A' and Px/Py=PA'. Since PA < PA', Nation 1 has a
comparative advantage in X and Nation 2 in Y. Specialization in production proceeds until
point B in Nation 1 and point B' in Nation 2, at which PB=PB' and the quantity supplied for
export of each commodity exactly equals the quantity demanded for import. Thus, Nation 1
starts at point A in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B in production,
and by exchanging BC of X for CE of Y reaches point E in consumption. E > A since it
involves more of both X and Y and lies on a higher community indifference curve. Nation 2
starts at A' in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B' in production, and by
exchanging B'C' of Y for C'E' of X reaches point E' in consumption (which exceeds A').
3. Draw a figure showing: (1) in Panel A a nation's demand and supply curve for A traded
commodity and the nation's excess supply of the commodity, (2) in Panel C the trade partner's
demand and supply curve for the same traded commodity and its excess demand for the
commodity, and (3) in Panel B the supply and demand for the quantity traded of the ommodity,
its equilibrium price, and why a price above or below the equilibrium price will not persist. At
any other price, QD QS, and P will change to P2.
The equilibrium relative commodity price for commodity X (the traded commodity exported
by Nation 1 and imported by Nation 2) is P2 and the equilibrium quantity of commodity X
traded is Q2.
4. a) Identify the conditions that may give rise to trade between two nations.
b) What are some of the assumptions on which the Heckscher-Ohlin theory is based?
c) What does this theory say about the pattern of trade and effect of trade on factor prices?
Answer:
a) Trade can be based on a difference in factor endowments, technology, or tastes between two
nations. A difference either in factor endowments or technology results in a different production
possibilities frontier for each nation, which, unless neutralized by a difference in tastes, leads to a
difference in relative commodity price and mutually beneficial trade. If two nations face
increasing costs and have identical production possibilities frontiers but different tastes, there
will also be a difference in relative commodity prices and the basis for mutually beneficial trade
between the two nations. The difference in relative commodity prices is then translated into a
difference in absolute commodity prices between the two nations, which is the immediate cause
of trade.
b) The Heckscher-Ohlin theory (sometimes referred to as the modern theory – as opposed to the
classical theory - of international trade) assumes that nations have the same tastes, use the same
technology, face constant returns to scale (i.e., a given percentage increase in all inputs increases
output by the same percentage) but differ widely in factor endowments. It also says that in the
face of identical tastes or demand conditions, this difference in factor endowments will result in a
difference in relative factor prices between nations, which in turn leads to a difference in relative
commodity prices and trade. Thus, in the Heckscher-Ohlin theory, the international difference in
supply conditions alone determines the pattern of trade. To be noted is that the two nations need
not be identical in other respects in order for international trade to be based primarily on the
difference in their factor endowments.
c) The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem postulates that each nation will export the commodity intensive in
its relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodity intensive in its relatively
scarce and expensive factor. As an important corollary, it adds that under highly restrictive
assumptions, trade will completely eliminate the pretrade relative and absolute differences in the
price of homogeneous factors among nations. Under less restrictive and more usual conditions,
however, trade will reduce, but not eliminate, the pretrade differences in relative and absolute
factor prices among nations. In any event, the Heckscher-Ohlin theory does say something very
useful on how trade affects factor prices and the distribution of income in each nation. Classical
economists were practically silent on this point.
5. Suppose that consumers demand more of commodity X (the L-intensive commodity) and less of
commodity Y (the K- intensive commodity). Suppose also that Nation 1 is India, commodity X
is textiles, and commodity Y is food. Starting from the no-trade equilibrium position and using
the Heckscher-Ohlin model, trace the effect of this change in tastes on India's
(a) relative commodity prices and demand for food and textiles,
(b) production of both commodities and factor prices, and
(c) comparative advantage and volume of trade.
(d) Do you expect international trade to lead to the complete equalization of relative commodity
and factor prices between India and the United States? Why?
Answer:
a) The change in tastes can be visualized by a shift toward the textile axis in India's indifference
map in such a way that an indifference curve is tangent to the steeper segment of India's
production frontier (because of increasing opportunity costs) after the increase in demand for
textiles. This will cause the pretrade relative commodity price of textiles to rise in India.
b) The increase in the relative price of textiles will lead domestic producers in India to shift labor
and capital from the production of food to the production of textiles. Since textiles are L-
intensive in relation to food, the demand for labor and therefore the wage rate will rise in
India. At the same time, as the demand for food falls, the demand for and thus the price of
capital will fall. With labor becoming relative more expensive, producers in India will
substitute capital for labor in the production of both textiles and food.
c) Even with the rise in relative wages and in the relative price of textiles, India still remains the
L-abundant and low-wage nation with respect to a nation such as the United States. However,
the pretrade difference in the relative price of textiles between India and the United States is
now somewhat smaller than before the change in tastes in India. As a result the volume
of trade required to equalize relative commodity prices and hence factor prices is smaller than
before. That is, India need now export a smaller quantity of textiles and import less food than
before for the relative price of textiles in India and the United States to be equalized.
Similarly, the gap between real wages and between India and the United States is now
smaller and can be more quickly and easily closed (i.e., with a smaller volume of trade).
d) Since many of the assumptions required for the complete equalization of relative commodity
and factor prices do not hold in the real world, great differences can be expected and do in fact
remain between real wages in India and the United States. Nevertheless, trade would tend to
reduce these differences, and the H-O model does identify the forces that must be considered to
analyze the effect of trade on the differences in the relative and absolute commodity and factor
prices between India and the United States.
Anwer:
a) The Heckscher-Ohlin trade model needs to be extended because, while generally correct, it fails
to explain a significant portion of international trade, particularly the trade in manufactured
products among industrial nations.
b) The international trade left unexplained by the basic Heckscher-Ohlin trade model can be
explained by
(1) economies of scale,
(2) intra-industry trade, and
(3) trade based on imitation gaps and product differentiation.
c) Differentiated products refer to similar, but not identical, products (such as cars, typewriters,
cigarettes, soaps, and so on) produced by the same industry or broad product group.
Intra-industry trade refers to the international trade in differentiated products.
"Calyx," said Ella promptly, the boys chiming in a little behind time.
"The whole is the corolla, and the parts or divisions are petals."
"Correct."
"But, mamma!" exclaimed Bennie, "my flower has no green part on the
outside. Do not all flowers have a calyx?"
"Some do not; but in the case of the poppy, the calyx falls off as the corolla
expands. Notice the bud which you have, the calyx is just ready to fall off."
"I see," said Bennie, and the rest examined the bud which he passed around.
"Now notice that in the pink the sepals are united in one piece, forming a cup,
while the petals are separate. Some flowers have united petals. Those we call
monopetalous, and those like the pink we call polypetalous. The sepals, calyx
and corolla taken together, are sometimes called the perianth. I do not
remember if I told you that the root, stem and leaves are the organs of
vegetation while the flower, fruit and seed are the organs of reproduction. Now
the calyx and corolla are only the protecting parts, while the essential organs
are the stamens and pistils. If you can remember all this, with all the new
names, you will do well for to-day, and next time we will talk about the
stamens and pistils. Just one thing more, you notice that as you pull out one
of the petals of the pink there is a long, narrow part running down into the
deep cup. We call that the claw of the petal. Now see if you can find all these
organs in other flowers, and give them their names."
SWEET-BRIER.
And leaving the children to busy themselves Mrs. Browne resumed her
sewing, though she sat near and now and then joined in the talk which
followed.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK RAILROAD
BUILDING, AND OTHER STORIES ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.