Professional Documents
Culture Documents
סקירת ביקורת על ספר חדש בעיתון ניו יורק טיימס
סקירת ביקורת על ספר חדש בעיתון ניו יורק טיימס
October 7, 2007
By Patricia Hampl.
The simple answer is that she loved her parents too much to leave.
“M. & D.,” as she referred to them in the journals she kept as if “doing
research for a historical novel,” were the force that pulled at her so
profoundly that her identity formed around them. Hampl’s mother,
with her lion’s mane of flyaway hair and arsenic wit, self-immolating
with “elderly fury,” was a woman of scabrous intelligence who kept
Hampl on edge. A librarian who secretly wanted to be a writer, she
loved her daughter to distraction, keeping an archive or “shrine” of
Hampl’s writing. She liked her daughter to play a role, “to be the
Writer” in her presence. Hampl’s father was a timid, steadfast artist
who believed in poetic proportion above all else; he held that order
“exists within matter itself and is understood as elegance.” While her
mother may have been the impetus behind Hampl’s career choice,
her father taught her the importance of beauty. Together, this
seemingly ordinary couple became the poles of Hampl’s existence,
opposing magnetic forces that held their conflicted daughter firmly
between them.
But in the end, Hampl’s honest examination of her own life makes
“The Florist’s Daughter” a wonder of a memoir. A conflicted
daughter, a begrudging Midwesterner and a woman who has been
besotted by illusions, Hampl proves that the material closest to home
is often the richest. Her mother, who complained that her daughter
never confided in her, who wanted her daughter to open her “cold
heart,” said upon learning that Hampl was writing this book: “Good.
It’s about time.” I think you will find that Mary Catherine Ann Teresa
Eleanor Marum Hampl was right.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/books/review/Trussoni-
t.html?_r=1&ei=5088&en=e168d4863665d4b1&ex=1349668800&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewan
ted=print&oref=slogin