Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ChemCatChem doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202101579
www.chemcatchem.org
The activation and functionalization of C F bonds in various is relatively scarce. NHCs based catalytic C F activation stands
fluoroorganics were found to be a daunting task owing to their out owing to its easy accessibility, stability, and facile reactivity.
innate inertness. Harnessing the C F bonds will alleviate the Metal-NHCs were exploited in hydrodefluorination, C C, and
toxicity and environmental issues posed by them, and provide C B coupling reactions. Additionally, R M(F)(NHC), an oxida-
new pathways to access value-added products. Although tive-addition intermediate that was conveniently isolated allows
several strategies have been employed such as metal com- to decode catalytic C F functionalization pathways. This minire-
plexes, Brønsted acids, Lewis acids, and photocatalyst to view provides the prominence of NHC and metal-NHC in the
activate the C F bonds, however, the use of NHC or Metal-NHC area of catalytic C F bond functionalization.
1. Introduction N-wingtips. Besides, saturation on the ring and the type of the
carbenes too play a vital role in its reactivity.[33–37] More
Fluoroorganics are favorable compounds in plastics, refriger- relevantly, NHCs are considered as a potential alternative to
ants, agrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, and electronic devices as phosphine-based systems and they are proven to be very
they are known for their robustness[1–4] This uncommon high effective in cleaving the C F bonds. Metal-NHCs react stoichio-
thermal and chemical stability is complemented by the small metrically with fluoroarenes to form aryl-metal-fluoride com-
size and high electronegativity possessed by fluorine atom.[5–8] plexes I as an isolable intermediate. Most likely, aryl-metal-
And thus, the cleavage of the C F in fluoroorganics is fluoride complexes were generated either by oxidative addition
challenging as the bond dissociation energy of them is more or by the nucleophilic attack. These developments enlightened
than 130 kcal/mol.[9] However, these intricate C F bond clea- the mechanistic pathways and guided the correct choice of
vages are feasible both in presence of metal and metal-free metal and NHC counterparts. Catalytically, the inclusion of
conditions. Thus, these routes will mitigate the environmental hydrogen sources to aryl-metal-fluorides completes hydrode-
hazards (CFCs) and address the bioaccumulation of fluorinated fluorination process II whereas organometallic reagents result
pharmaceuticals.[10] in cross-coupled products III. Likewise, catalytically aryl-metal-
Interestingly, the activation of the C F bonds gives access fluoride complexes react with aryl halides and boronic esters to
to partially fluorinated building blocks from easily available give homocoupled III and borylated products IV respectively.
perfluorinated chemicals resulting in value-added products.[2,11] More impressively, this intriguing C F bond cleavage happens
In other words, replacement of fluorine atom in C F bond with elegantly with the intervention of NHC as a coupling partner.
other functionality involving C O, C S, C N, C P, C B, C Si, Both mono V and double VI C F bond activations were
and C-halogen bond formation will make fluoroorganics more accomplished. Distinctively, fluoroalkenes display C F bond
amenable and useful.[12,13] To complement these functionalities, cleavage revealing this addition-elimination capability alongside
concomitant formation of thermodynamic sinks such as HF, its leaving-group tendency resulting in rearranged coupled
R3SiF, or BF4 were observed. Generally, cleavage of the C F product VII (Figure 1).
was effected by using metal complexes[14,15] (metallocenes,[1,16–20]
metal-phosphines,[7,21–26] metal-carbonyls,[4,6,23] metal-NHCs,[27,28]
and rare earth metals[29,30]), strong Brønsted acids (such as
hydrogen halides), strong Lewis acids[31] (such as aluminum,[3,9]
boron, carbocation, and silylation compounds[15,32]) and
photocatalysis.[9] In the case of metal complexes, both stoichio-
metric and catalytic conversions were achieved, where the
former transformation assisted in understanding the key steps
involved in the catalytic cycle. It has been understood that
NHCs are versatile moieties exhibiting interesting reactivity,
which acts as organocatalysts as well as metal-NHC catalysts.
NHCs are significantly stronger donors than commonly used
tertiary phosphines which can be substantiated by Tolman
electronic parameters (TEP). NHC exhibits improved stability to
air, moisture, and is facile to oxidative-addition reactions. NHCs
impart high stability to metals at higher oxidation states
whereas phosphines are prone to form phosphines oxides.
Advantageously, NHC’s electronic and steric can be easily
manipulated by changing the substituents on its backbone and
form the 10 d. This overall reaction is a one-electron oxidative compounds catalyzed by iron(ll)fluoride complex bearing bulky
addition starting from 10 a to 10 d and 10 e (Scheme 6).[43] β-diketiminate ligand.[46] In 2002, Fort and co-workers hinted at
dehalogenation of fluorobenzene catalyzed by Ni(0)/IMes·HCl/i-
PrONa combination to yield benzene (yield = 45 %), and sodium
3. Organic transformations-catalytic process isopropoxide as the source of hydrogen[47]. Later, in 2009
Whittlesey and co-workers investigated the metal-NHC (precata-
3.1. Hydrodefluorination (HDF) lyst) for the catalytic HDF. The N-aryl substituted N-heterocyclic
carbene complexes Ru(NHC)(PPh3)2(CO)(H)2 11 a–d promotes
With the known passive nature of the C F bonds in fluoroar- the catalytic hydrodefluorination (HDF) of aromatic fluorocar-
enes, the hydrodefluorination (HDF) method helps to remove bons in the presence of alkyl silanes to give perfluoroarenes
the more stable C F bond and replace it with C H. Besides, along with coordinatively unsaturated species Ru-
HDF will mitigate the problem posed by chlorofluorocarbons (NHC)(PPh3)(CO)HF 11 e–h. However, they witnessed that 11 b
(greenhouse gases). Milstein and co-workers were the first to (R = IMes) failed to replace phosphine ligands completely.
tame the C F bonds, and they reported rhodium-phosphine Interestingly, in this HDF chemistry, the highly regioselective
catalyzed F/H exchange with hydrosilanes.[44,45] Later, Holland 1,2-partially fluorinated products starting from C6F5H 12 were
group demonstrated the HDF of perfluorinated aromatic observed, which is in contrast with the previous reports by both
Milstein and Holland showed 1,4-products (Scheme 7).[48] In
2011, the same group revealed the mechanistic pathways and
DFT calculation for the regioselective 1,2-partially fluorinated
products. Based on the DFT calculations, the catalytic cycle of
hydrodefluorination (HDF) of 12 to 1,2,3,4-C6F4H2 13 by 11 a,d is
depicted in (Scheme 8). The nucleophilic attack of a Ru hydride
ligand on the fluoroarene ring supports the unusual ortho-
regioselectivity that was observed experimentally.[49] Comple-
mentary to this work, in 2013, they unveiled a complete DFT
study on 11 b, which supports (i) a concerted process with Ru–
H/C F exchange occurring in a single step; and (ii) a stepwise
pathway in which the rate-determining transition state involves
removal of HF and formation of a Ru-σ-fluoroaryl complex
(Scheme 8). Besides, the nature of the metal coordination
environment, and more specifically, the NHC ligand was found
Scheme 7. Whittlesey’s HDF by Ru(NHC)(PPh3)2(CO)H2. Scheme 8. Mechanism for nucleophilic hydride attack.
In 2015, Baker and his team demonstrated the facile Csp3 F and
Ni CF bond activation in low-coordinate pseudo-three-coordi-
nate nickelacycle (NHC Ni) 28 a, which leads to novel perfluor- Scheme 14. Defluorination in metallacycle.
Scheme 17. Kumada type cross-coupling by alkyl-Grignards. Scheme 18. Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling to form 6-arylpurine.
3.7. Defluoroborylation
the corresponding biaryls of 87 %, 35 %, and 20 %, The synthesis of arylboronic esters is of great importance in
respectively.[65] However, in 2016 Radius exemplified the organic synthetic chemistry as they are widely used in Suzuki-
versatility of 1 in Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of fluoroarenes
with various aryl boronates. Among various aryl boronates,
ethyleneglycolato (aryl-Beg) and neopentylglycol (aryl-Bneop)
esters were the most efficient. The additive CsF is best for this
coupling reaction (Scheme 20).[66]
Scheme 20. Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling with boronic esters. Scheme 22. Negishi type cross-coupling reaction.
Miyaura cross-coupling. Utilization of C F bond in fluoroareanes elegantly used Ni0 complex (CAAC)2Ni 46 for catalytic homocou-
for borylation is scarce. Previously, in 2015, Martin and Hosoya pling of aryl fluorides to form biaryls (Scheme 24).[71]
independently reported borylation of monofluoroarenes with a
catalytic amount of Ni0/PCy3.[68,69] Radius studied his precatalyst
1 for defluoroborylation, but it decomposed in the presence of
diboron esters at high temperatures. Alternatively, when the
4. C F bond activation by N-heterocyclic
catalytic amount of [Ni(IMes)2] complex 9 a was used in place of carbene and their isoelectronic
1, C F borylation of fluoroaromatic compounds was successful. analogs-stoichiometric reaction
The borylation of fluoroarenes containing different degrees of
fluorination was achieved in moderate to good yields, even 4.1. Fluoroarenes
diborylation products were observed (Scheme 23).[70]
Electron deficient arenes are likely to undergo nucleophilic
aromatic substitution (SNAr) reaction, a unique class where the
3.8. Reductive homocoupling C F bond activation can be achieved a little easier compara-
tively. NHCs are notable organics that act as spectator ligands
Substituting one σ-donating quaternary carbon atom in place in organometallics and catalysis, In contemporary Kuhn and
of a π-donating N atom in the NHCs forms a new set of unusual Arduengo harnessed the electron-rich carbon center in NHCs to
carbene, cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC) with the increased activate and functionalize C F bond in pentafluoropyridine and
nucleophilic and electrophilic properties. In 2014, Roesky group C H bonds in acetylene & acetonitrile respectively.[72] The
breakthrough work by Kuhn and co-workers in 1998, describes
the C F activation of pentafluoropyridine 6 by tetraalkylimida-
zol-2-ylidenes 48 & 49 at low temperatures (Scheme 25).[73]
After a decade, the same group reported the C F activation
of hexafluorobenzene using 49 in the presence of boron
trifluoride diethyl etherate to give 1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethyl-
2-(perfluorophenyl)imidazolium tetrafluoroborate 52 a. 2,2’-(per-
fluoro-1,4-phenylene)bis(1,3-diisopropyl-4,5 dimeth-
ylimidazolium)bis(tetrafluoroborate) 53 was formed when 49
and 2 are taken in the ratio of 2 : 1 in BF3 · Et2O solution
(Scheme 26). Likewise, 49 reacts with perfluorobenzonitrile, 1,3-
dicyano-2,4,5,6-tetrafluorobenzene, and 2,4,6-trifluoro-1,3,5-tria-
zin in the presence of BF3·Et2O to give C F functionalized
product 2, 2-(4-cyano-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl)-1,3-diisopropyl-
4,5-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate 52 b, 2-(2,4-dicyano-
2,5,6-trifluorophenyl)-1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazolium
tetrafluoroborate 52 c, and 2-(4,6-difluoro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-1,3-
diisopropyl-4,5- dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate 52 d
respectively (Scheme 27).[74]
In 2015, Bertrand and co-workers used Et2CAACs 54 to
activate para-C F bond in pentafluoropyridine 5 to give 55.
Independently, Et2CAACs and pyridine are redox-active species,
further, they studied their properties by conjugating them
together (Scheme 28).[75] In the following year, Turner reacted
Me2
CAACs 56 with hexafluorobenzene 2 and pentafluoroben-
Scheme 23. Borylation by C F activation.
zene 12 to give double C F activated products 57 a and 58,
which possess two chiral centers and were isolated as a racemic
4.2. Fluoroalkenes
5. Organocatalysis
6. Summary
Conflict of Interest
[44] M. Aizenberg, D. Milstein, Science 1994, 265, 359 LP – 361. [71] K. C. Mondal, P. P. Samuel, Y. Li, H. W. Roesky, S. Roy, L. Ackermann, N. S.
[45] M. Aizenberg, D. Milstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8674–8675. Sidhu, G. M. Sheldrick, E. Carl, S. Demeshko, S. De, P. Parameswaran, L.
[46] J. Vela, J. M. Smith, Y. Yu, N. A. Ketterer, C. J. Flaschenriem, R. J. Ungur, L. F. Chibotaru, D. M. Andrada, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 818–
Lachicotte, P. L. Holland, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7857–7870. 823.
[47] C. Desmarets, S. Kuhl, R. Schneider, Y. Fort, Organometallics 2002, 21, [72] A. J. Arduengo III, J. C. Calabrese, F. Davidson, H. V. Rasika Dias, J. R.
1554–1559. Goerlich, R. Krafczyk, W. J. Marshall, M. Tamm, R. Schmutzler, Helv. Chim.
[48] S. P. Reade, M. F. Mahon, M. K. Whittlesey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, Acta 1999, 82, 2348–2364.
1847–1861. [73] N. Kuhn, J. Fahl, R. Boeseb, G. Henkelc, Naturforsch. B J. Chem. Sci. 1998,
[49] J. A. Panetier, S. A. MacGregor, M. K. Whittlesey, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 881–886.
2011, 50, 2783–2786; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 2835–2838. [74] M. S. E. Mallah, N. Kuhn, C. Maichle-Mossmer, M. Steimann, Z. K. P.
[50] S. A. MacGregor, D. McKay, J. A. Panetier, M. K. Whittlesey, Dalton Trans. Zeller, Naturforsch. B J. Chem. Sci. 2009, 64, 1176–1182.
2013, 42, 7386–7395. [75] S. Styra, M. Melaimi, C. E. Moore, A. L. Rheingold, T. Augenstein, F.
[51] D. McKay, I. M. Riddlestone, S. A. Macgregor, M. F. Mahon, M. K. Breher, G. Bertrand, Chem. A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8441–8446.
Whittlesey, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 776–787. [76] Z. R. Turner, Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 11461–11468.
[52] M. K. Cybulski, I. M. Riddlestone, M. F. Mahon, T. J. Woodman, M. K. [77] Y. Kim, E. Lee, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10922–10925.
Whittlesey, Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 19597–19605. [78] U. S. D. Paul, U. Radius, Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 3993–4009.
[53] P. Fischer, K. Götz, A. Eichhorn, U. Radius, Organometallics 2012, 31, [79] J. Emerson-King, S. A. Hauser, A. B. Chaplin, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15,
1374–1383. 787–789.
[54] H. Lv, J. H. Zhan, Y. B. Cai, Y. Yu, B. Wang, J. L. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. [80] M. Pait, G. Kundu, S. Tothadi, S. Karak, S. Jain, K. Vanka, S. S. Sen, Angew.
2012, 134, 16216–16227. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2804–2808; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 2830–
[55] S. Sabater, J. A. Mata, E. Peris, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1–7. 2834.
[56] N. O. Andrella, A. J. Sicard, S. I. Gorelsky, I. Korobkov, R. T. Baker, Chem. [81] G. Kundu, S. De, S. Tothadi, A. Das, D. Koley, S. S. Sen, Chem. A Eur. J.
Sci. 2015, 6, 6392–6397. 2019, 25, 16533–16537.
[57] Y. Ogiwara, S. Hosaka, N. Sakai, Organometallics 2020, 39, 856–861. [82] G. Kundu, V. S. Ajithkumar, M. K. Bisai, S. Tothadi, T. Das, K. Vanka, S. S.
[58] P. J. Morgan, M. W. D. Hanson-Heine, H. P. Thomas, G. C. Saunders, A. C. Sen, Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 4428–4431.
Marr, P. Licence, Organometallics 2020, 39, 2116–2124. [83] T. Fujita, K. Fuchibe, J. Ichikawa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 390–
[59] V. P. W. Böhm, C. W. K. Gstöttmayr, T. Weskamp, W. A. Herrmann, Angew. 402; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 396–408.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3387. [84] A. J. Arduengo, J. C. Calabrese, H. V. Rasika Dias, F. Davidson, J. R.
[60] T. Schaub, M. Backes, U. Radius, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15964– Goerlich, A. Jockisch, M. Kline, W. J. Marshall, J. W. Runyon, Phosphorus
15965. Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2016, 191, 527–534.
[61] Y. Sun, H. Sun, J. Jia, A. Du, X. Li, Organometallics 2014, 33, 1079–1081. [85] M. C. Leclerc, S. I. Gorelsky, B. M. Gabidullin, I. Korobkov, R. T. Baker,
[62] T. T. Tsou, J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7547–7560. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 8063–8067.
[63] Z. Mo, Q. Zhang, L. Deng, Organometallics 2012, 31, 6518–6521. [86] M. C. Leclerc, B. M. Gabidullin, J. G. Da Gama, S. L. Daifuku, T. E. Iannuzzi,
[64] J. Liu, M. J. Robins, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1149–1151. M. L. Neidig, R. T. Baker, Organometallics 2017, 36, 849–857.
[65] M. Ohashi, H. Saijo, M. Shibata, S. Ogoshi, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 443– [87] J. Yan, K. Shi, C. Zhao, L. Ding, S. Jiang, L. Yang, G. Zhong, Chem.
447. Commun. 2018, 54, 1567–1570.
[66] J. Zhou, J. H. J. Berthel, M. W. Kuntze-Fechner, A. Friedrich, T. B. Marder,
U. Radius, J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 5789–5794.
[67] M. W. Kuntze-Fechner, C. Kerpen, D. Schmidt, M. Häring, U. Radius, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1767–1775.
[68] X.-W. Liu, J. Echavarren, C. Zarate, R. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137,
12470–12473.
[69] T. Niwa, H. Ochiai, Y. Watanabe, T. Hosoya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137,
14313–14318. Manuscript received: October 16, 2021
[70] J. Zhou, M. W. Kuntze-Fechner, R. Bertermann, U. S. D. Paul, J. H. J. Revised manuscript received: December 31, 2021
Berthel, A. Friedrich, Z. Du, T. B. Marder, U. Radius, J. Am. Chem. Soc. Accepted manuscript online: January 26, 2022
2016, 138, 5250–5253. Version of record online: February 11, 2022