Kamalesh Final

CHAPTER -I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Technical analysis studies share’s price movement, volume traded over years, and they try
to Predict future price movements of shares. Technical analysis does not attempt to measure a
security’s intrinsic value, but instead uses charts and other tools to identify patterns that can
suggest future activity. Technical analysis is entirely based on prices and do not include balance
sheets, P&L accounts(fundamental analysis). technical analysis is more dynamic as compared to
fundamental analysis because it depends on corporate events like earnings of firm, policy
changes. Technical analysis of selected companies share helps to know about the price behavior
of the share, the signals (buy or sell), demand and supply of company share in market. The investor
can use technical analysis as toolto decide on investment in stock or to sell stock at that point of
time.
• The market discounts everything.

• Price moves in trends.
• History tends to repeat itself.
• Statement of the Problem.
The major problem in the firm was to give technical advice to investors based on technical
analysis. The study will provide an insight into the different aspect of technical analysis which
will help to guide the investors. For this purpose, various technical tools like Relative Strength Index
and Exponential Moving Average.
1
1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE
ZEE. NS
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (ZEE): ZEE is the largest player in the Indian satellite TV
sector. It has a wide range of channels across genres, including news, entertainment, movies,
sports, and kids. ZEE also has a strong presence in the international market.
SUN TV. N S
Sun TV Network has a strong presence in the South Indian market. The company's channels are
available in over 95 million households in India. Sun TV Network also has a growing presence in
the international market. The company's channels are available in over 100 countries around the
world. Sun TV Network is a profitable company. In the financial year 2022, the company reported
revenue of ₹147 billion (US$1.9 billion) and profit of ₹59 billion (US$770 million).
TV18BRDCST.NS
TV18 Broadcast Limited is an Indian media and entertainment company that operates a number
of television channels, including news, entertainment, and movies channels. The company is a
subsidiary of Network18 Media & Investments Limited. TV18 Broadcast Limited is a profitable
company. In the financial year 2022, the company reported revenue of ₹78.2 billion (US$1.05
billion) and profit of ₹1.27 billion (US$160 million).
NETWORK 18. NS
Network18 Media & Investments Ltd. is an Indian media and entertainment company that
operates a number of television channels, newspapers, magazines, websites, and mobile apps. The
company is headquartered in Mumbai, India. Network18 is a profitable company. In the financial
year 2022, the company reported revenue of ₹120.4 billion (US$1.55 billion) and profit of ₹19.4
billion (US$250 million).
NDTV.NS
NDTV's websites and mobile apps are also very popular. The company's website, NDTV.com, is
one of the most visited news websites in India. NDTV also has a number of popular mobile apps,
2
such as NDTV News and NDTV Profit.NDTV is a profitable company. In the financial year 2022,
the company reported revenue of ₹21.3 billion (US$270 million) and profit of ₹1.3 billion
(US$160 million).
TVTODAY.NS
TV Today Network Limited is an Indian media and entertainment company that operates a
number of television channels, including news, entertainment, and business channels. The
company is headquartered in Noida, India. TV Today Network Limited is a profitable company.
In the financial year 2022, the company reported revenue of ₹125.6 billion (US$1.59 billion) and
profit of ₹22.6 billion (US$300 million).
ENIL.NS
Entertainment Network India Limited (ENIL) is a subsidiary of Times Group. ENIL operates
the radio station brand Radio Mirchi. Radio Mirchi is one of the most popular radio stations in
India. It has a network of over 450 stations in 100 cities. ENIL's growth is being driven by the
increasing popularity of radio in India. Radio is a popular medium for reaching a mass audience.
It is also a cost-effective medium for advertisers.
ZEE MEDIA.NS
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL) is one of the largest media and entertainment
companies in India. The company operates a variety of television channels, including news,
entertainment, and sports channels. ZEEL also has a strong presence in the digital media space.
Eel’s revenue is generated from advertising, subscription fees, and content licensing. The
company's profit is generated from a combination of operating income and other income.
RADIO CITY.NS
Radio City is a subsidiary of Times Group. It operates a network of over 450 radio stations in 100
cities in India. Radio City is one of the most popular radio stations in India. It is known for its
Hindi music and youth-oriented programming. Radio City's revenue is generated from advertising
and subscription fees. The company's profit is generated from a combination of operating income
and other income.
3
RAJ TV. NS
Raj Television Network Limited is a privately held company that operates a number of television
channels in four South Indian languages: Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam. Raj TV is the
flagship channel of the network. It is one of the most popular television channels in South India.
Raj TV's revenue is generated from advertising and subscription fees. The company's profit is
generated from a combination of operating income and other income Raj Television Network
Limited is a privately held company that operates a number of television channels in four South
Indian languages: Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam. Raj TV is the flagship channel of the
network. It is one of the most popular television channels in South India.
Raj TV's revenue is generated from advertising and subscription fees. The company's profit is
generated from a combination of operating income and other income.
1.3 COMPANY PROFILE

IIFL Finance Limited (hitherto referred to as IIFL (NSE: IIFL, BSE: 532636) is one of the leading
players in the financial services space in India. Together with its subsidiaries – IIFL Home Finance
Limited, IIFL Samasta Finance Limited (Formerly known as Samasta Microfinance Limited) and
IIFL Open Fintech Private Limited, it provides a diverse range of loans and mortgages.
These include home loans, gold loans, business loans including loans against property and medium
& small enterprise financing, micro finance, developer & construction finance and capital market
finance, catering to both retail and corporate clients.
The company has a nationwide presence with a thriving network of 3,119 branches across 500+
cities.
COMPANY NAME : IIFL FINANCIAL SERVICES
PROPRIETOR : R.ARULVENKADAN
ESTABLISHED ON :1995
ADDERS :11/2, VISHNU NAGAR, MUDICHUR ROAD, WEST TAMBARAM,
CHENNAI-600045.
INDUSTRY : FINANCIAL SERVICES
4
1.4 REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
The study aims at accessing the different factors which resists common man in India from
investing in stock market. Besides analyzing the factors, methods to overcome such hesitations
with the sole motive to induce investment in Indian Stock Market havealso been worked upon.
The purpose of this chapter is to present a review of literature relating to the study conducted in
context to different concepts and ideas of other researchers. There has been a wide range of
studies in regard to Indian Stock Market. This segment highlights certain important studies that
are relevant to the context.
Tripathy, Trilochan. Gil-Alana, Luis A. (2015)

This paper models time-varying volatility in one of the Indian main stock markets, namely, the
National Stock Exchange (NSE) located in Mumbai, investigating whether ithas been affected by
the recent global financial crisis. A Chow test indicates the presence of a structural break. Both
symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models suggest that the volatility of NSE returns is persistent
and asymmetric and has increased as a result of the crisis. The model under the Generalized Error
Distribution appears to be the most suitable one. However, its out-of-sample forecasting
performance is relatively poor.
Balasubramanian, Bala N and Ramaswamy, Anand. (2014)

The research studied concentrated ownership and control is the predominantshareholding pattern
in India. Over the 11-year study period from December 2001–December 2011, controlling
shareholders further entrenched themselves by substantially increasing their holdings. Foreign
companies in this study strengthened their entrenchment, with median holdings running over 50%
rights through. The changesin the Government policy opened up several business sectors for the
majority of foreign direct investment could have been a contributing factor for the decline in the
number of listedcompanies. Government-owned companies in this sample witnessed a decline
in non-institutional shareholdings over the study period, with institutional holdings showing
corresponding increases.
Rudra P. Pradhan; Flávio De São Pedro Filho; John H. Hall (2014)

This paper investigates the impact of stock market development, money supply and inflation on
economic growth in India during the post-globalisation era of the 1990s, especially during the
period from 1994 to 2012. Using autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) bounds testing
approach, the study finds stock market development, money supply, inflation and economic
growth are co integrated, suggesting the presence of a long-run equilibrium relationship between
5
them. The vector autoregressive error correction model (VECM) further confirms the existence
of both bidirectional and unidirectional causality between economic growth, money supply,
inflation and stock market development in India. The policy implication of this study is that
inflation and money supply can be considered a policy variable to predict both economic growth
and stock market development in the Indian economy during the postglobalization era.
Chauhan, Daksha Pratapsinh. Dec (2013)

The researcher has studied the financial performance of NSE and BSE over the last decade. The
study aims to find out the stock exchange which is performing financially better on various bases.
This study is limited to only financial performance covering averages of profits, listing income,
brokerage income, operating expenses, Return on Capital Employed, total revenue income, etc.
The tool for appraisal of financial performance is mean, standard deviation, co-efficient of
variance and trend analysis.
They have looked at the price returns of individual stocks, with data from the National Stock
Exchange (NSE) and daily closing price data from both NSE and the Bombay Stock Exchange
(BSE), the two largest exchanges in India.
Bala, Anju. (2013)

The research studied the Indian stock market in depth. The study was conducted to findout the
past, present and future trend or the prospect of Indian stock market. This study provided
guidelines to investors to maximize their profit by minimizing risk. High degreeof volatility in the
present in Indian stock market will lead to development of future. Therisk can be mitigated in the
stock market by spreading of investment across variousoptions.
Venkateswara K.S. Kumar & Prof. Devi V. Rama Devi (2013)

Conducted by Professors of KLU Business School, KL University, Andhra Pradesh, the above-
mentioned research emphasizes the contribution of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) & Foreign
Institutional Investors (FII) on the Stock Market. It is also an analysis onthe trend & pattern of FDI
& FII flow in the Indian economy, with its influencing aspectson the country.
Narayan, Paresh Kumar & Ahmed, Huson Ali & Sharma, Susan Sunila & K.P., Prabheesh (2014)
In this paper, using a range of technical trading and momentum trading strategies, we show that
the Indian stock market is profitable. We find robust evidence that investing in some sectors is
relatively more profitable than investing in others. We show that sectoral heterogeneity with
respect to profitability is a result of the gradual diffusion of information from the market to the
6
sectors. Specifically, we show that whilethe market predicts returns of sectors, the magnitude of
predictability varies with sectors. Our results are robust in a range of trading strategies.
Mishra, Ankita. Mishra, Vinod. Smyth, Russell. (2014)

This study tests the random walk hypothesis for the Indian stock market. Using 19 years of
monthly data on six indices from the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock
Exchange (BSE), this study applies three different unit root tests with two structural breaks to
analyze the random walk hypothesis. We find that unit root tests that allow for two structural
breaks alone are not able to reject the unit root null; however, a recently developed unit root test
that simultaneously accounts for heteroscedasticity and structural breaks, finds that the stock
indices are mean reverting.
Our results point to the importance of addressing heteroscedasticity when testing for a random
walk with high frequency financial data.
Munda Santosh (2014) researched that there is an extraordinary growth in the investment sector
both in terms of volume and number of investors in India over the past decade due to the
deregulation of the financial sector. There are various investment products with numerous options
to lure the investors to invest. Thus, it becomes essential that the regulators and the various other
stakeholders of stock exchanges be proactive in taking care of the interests of the individual
investors.
D. Suganya and Dr. S. Parvathi (2014) in their research on Equity Investors Risk Tolerance Level
during the Volatility of Indian Stock Market found out that majority of the investors are investing
in equity for the objective of growth.
M. Thenmozhi and Chandra Abhijeet (2013) conducted research on India Volatility Index and
Risk Management in the Indian Stock Market and demonstrated that there is a statistically
significant negative relationship between the stock market returns and volatility.
Roy Sankharaj (2013) conducted research on Economic Recession and Volatility in the Indian
Stock Market. This paper provides evidence on the behavior of stock prices and volatility during
the period of pre- and post-recession period. After the study of the stockmarket volatility, it has
been concluded that the volatility during the phase of economic recession i.e. 2008 was high in
the Indian market.
A. Bhatt Dr. Kaushal (2013) said that most of the investors are very sensitive about safety of their
7
investment. They want more safety and reliability. Current trend and easyaccess is not affected the
investor as much as safety and reliability. Most of the earningpeople invest their income up to
different level in any sector, so investment company have also very much scope of gaining
business.
Naliniprava Tripathy (2013)
This research examines the efficiency of Indian stock market by using daily closing price of BSE
SENSEX from August 2002 to March 2011. The study has used unit root test, autocorrelation
test, runs test, GARCH (symmetric) EGARCH and TARCH (asymmetric) models to determine
the random walk behavior of Indian stock market. Further this study has employed various
forecasting approaches to measure the forecasting accuracy of symmetric and asymmetric
models. This study suggests that asymmetric models provide better forecasting performance than
symmetric models. The result of the study shows that Indian stock market does not exhibit a
random walk behavior and weak form of market efficiency. The study concludes that investor
can make abnormal profits by studying and forecasting the prices of assets in this market.
Didier, Tatiana & Schmukler, Sergio L. (2013)

The study was on the extent to which firms in China and India use capital markets to obtain
financing and grow. Using new data on domestic and international capital raising and firm
performance, it finds that financial market activity has expanded less since the 1990s than
aggregate figures suggest. Relatively few firms raise capital and even fewerattract most of the
financing. Moreover, firms that issue equity or bonds are different and behave differently from
other publicly listed firms. Among other things, they are typically larger and grow faster. The
differences between users and nonusers exist before the capital raising, are associated with the
probability of raising capital, and become more pronounced afterward. The size distribution of
issuing firms shifts more over time than the distribution of those that do not issue, suggesting
little convergence in size among listed firms.
Mrunal Joshi (2013)

In current scenario of Indian stock market each investors are required to be alert enough about
happenings in the market. For that purpose it is very important for each and every investor to be
aware about major factors affecting stock market. In this paperit has been tried to find out
major factors responsible for up-down movementin Indian stock market. From the study it
has been found that factors like Flow of Foreign Institutional Investors, Political Stability
Growth of Gross Domestic Product,
8
1.6 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The satellite television industry in India, once perceived as a promising investment
avenue, is currently facing a perplexing challenge characterized by a sustained lack of growth
in the value of its associated stocks within the Indian stock market. Despite initial optimism,
these stocks have failed to exhibit the anticipated upward trajectory, causing concern among
investors, industry analysts, and policymakers.
1.7 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

• A study on investor analysis on electronic and instruments stocks in NSE.
• A study technical analysis on electronic and instruments stocks in NSE.
• To analysis the electronic instruments stocks using SMA.
• To analysis the electronic and instruments stocks using RSI.
• To analysis the electronic and instruments stocks using MONEY FLOW INDEX.
• To analysis the electronic and instruments stocks using MOVINNG AVERAGE
DEVIATION.
1.8 SCOPE OF STUDY
The scope for technical analysis on electronic and instruments stocks in NSE is quite
large. This sector is home to many companies that are leaders in the development and
manufacturing of electronic components, instruments, and systems. These companies are
often exposed to 14 cyclical trends, which can create opportunities for technical traders.
Technical analysis can be a powerful tool for traders who are looking to profit from short-
term price movements in electronic and instruments stocks. However, it is important to use
technical analysis in conjunction with other factors, such as fundamental analysis, to make
informed investment decisions.
1.9 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
o The duration of study was limited to the period of 30 days
o This study has been conducted purely to understand technical analysis for investors.
o The study is restricted to electronic and instruments manufacturing companies based on
technical analysis
o Since the market may or may not certain, there may be higher risk of failure in predictive
assumptions and analysis
9
CHAPTER-II
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

Research design is the overall strategy used to conduct a research study. It serves as a guide
for gathering, evaluating, and interpreting information and data. Research design followed for
the study is Descriptive Analytical Research.
2.2 POPULATION
The population for this research is comprised of companies that are engaged in specialty
chemical stocks listed on the National Stock Exchange.
The population of the research also comprises the group of individuals who are involved in
investment activities.
SAMPLING DESIGN:
Sampling design is the overall plan for selecting a sample from a population. Thesamples are
selected from the stocks of companies listed in the National Stock Exchange.
2.3 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

Sampling technique in research is the process of selecting a subset of a population to represent
the whole population for the purpose of conducting research. Sampling Technique used in this
research is Purposive Sampling for analyzing the performance of specialty chemical stocks.
Whereas Simple Random Sampling is applied for analyzing the perception of the investors
towards their investments.
2.4 SAMPLE SIZE

The sample size of the research is five years of data collected on equity stocks of companiesengaged
in specialty chemicals. And also, it includes 120 respondents from investors.
10
2.5 SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTION
Primary Data:
Primary data is data that is collected directly from the source. It is the first-handdata that is
collected for the first time.
Secondary Data:
Data that has previously been gathered by another party is referred to as secondary
data.
2.6 TOOLS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION

• Primary source of data collected from the respondents by surveying them
withthe help of a questionnaire.
• Secondary source of data collected from the websites having financial
data ofthe companies listed in NSE.
2.7 TOOLS USED FOR DATA ANALYSIS

• Simple Moving Average
• Relative Strength Index
• Money flow index
• Moving average deviation.
Simple Moving Average:
The SMA represents the average price over the given time frame. Whereas the average is
referred to as "moving" on the chart because it is displayed bar by bar, creating a line that
travels across the graph as the average value changes. Trend direction is frequently determined
using SMAs.
The formula for SMA is
SMA = (Sum of closing price for N periods) / N
11
Relative Strength Index:
The relative strength index (RSI) is a momentum indicator used to measure the speed and
magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overvalued or undervalued conditions in the
price. RSI has been broken down into its basic components: RS, Average Gain and Average Loss.
RSI calculation is based on 14 periods Losses are expressed as positive values, not negative values.
The very first calculations for average gain and average loss are simple 14-period averages:
Formula for RSI
RSI=100-(100/1+RS)
Where:
RS=Average gain per day/Average loss per day.
MONEY FLOW INDEX
The Money Flow Index (MFI) is a technical oscillator that uses price and volume data for
identifying overbought or oversold signals in an asset. It can also be used to
spot divergences which warn of a trend change in price. The oscillator moves between 0 and 100.
Unlike conventional oscillators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI), the Money Flow Index
incorporates both price and volume data, as opposed to just price. For this reason, some analysts
call MFI the volume-weighted RSI.
➢ Money Flow Index=100−100\1+Money Flow Ratio
➢ where:
Money Flow Ratio=14 Period positive Money Flow/14 Period negative Money Flow
Raw Money Flow=Typical Price * Volume
➢ Typical Price=High + Low + Close/3
12
MOVING AVERAGE DEVIATION
Moving average deviation (MAD) is a technical analysis tool that measures the average deviation
of a security's price from its moving average. The MAD indicator can identify overbought and
oversold conditions and generate buy and sell signals.
Formula for MAD,
MAD = (x – MA) /
13
CHAPTER- lll
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
3.1PRIMARY DATA
Gender of the respondent

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid male 54 53.5 53.5 53.5
Female 47 46.5 46.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the
maximum percentage falls under Male category (53.5%) and the
minimum percentage falls under Female category(46.5%)
Marital status

Percent Percent
Valid married 67 66.3 66.3 66.3
unmarried 34 33.7 33.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage falls under
married category (66.3%) and the minimum percentage falls under unmarried category (33.7%)
14
Age

Percent Percent
Valid Below 11 10.9 10.9 10.9
20
21-40 48 47.5 47.5 58.4
41-60 35 34.7 34.7 93.1
Above 7 6.9 6.9 100.0
60
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage falls
under21-40 category (47.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Above 60 category
(10.9%)
Locality
Percent Percent
Valid Rural 11 10.9 10.9 10.9
Semi 38 37.6 37.6 48.5
urban
Urban 52 51.5 51.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Urban category (51.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Rural category (10.9%)
15
Education
Percent Percent
Valid 10th and 2 2.0 2.0 2.0
below
Intermediate 9 8.9 8.9 10.9
Diploma 12 11.9 11.9 22.8
Graduation 70 69.3 69.3 92.1
post- 8 7.9 100.0
graduation
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Graduation category (69.3%) and the minimum percentage falls under 10th and below category
(2.0%)
Occupation
Percent Percent
Valid Employee of 33 32.7 32.7 32.7
government
Employee of private 50 49.5 49.5 82.2
Professionals and 18 17.8 17.8 100.0
business
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Employee of private category (82.2%) and the minimum percentage falls under Employee of
government category (32.2%)
16
Monthly income
Percent Percent
Valid Below 32 31.7 31.7 31.7
15000
15000- 42 41.6 41.6 73.3
35000
35000- 20 19.8 19.8 93.1
45000
45000- 7 6.9 6.9 100.0
55000
Total 101 100. 100.0
0
INTERPERTATION
15000-35000 category (41.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under 45000-55000 category
(6.9%)
How much you save

Percent Percent
Valid Below 20 19.8 19.8 19.8
5%
5%-10% 50 49.5 49.5 69.3
10%- 28 27.7 27.7 97.0
15%
15%- 3 3.0 3.0 100.0
20%
Total 101 100.0 100.0
17
INTERPERTATION
10%-15%category (97.0%) and the minimum percentage falls under Below 5% category (19.8%)
Accumulation of funds
Percent Percent
Valid Most 69 68.3 68.3 68.3

important
Important 32 31.7 31.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Most important category (68.3%) and the minimum percentage falls under Important category
(31.7%)
House development
Percent Percent
Valid Most 74 73.2 73.2 73.2
important
Important 27 26.8 26.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Most important category (73.2%) and the minimum percentage falls under Important category
(26.8%)
Purchasing of asset
Percent Percent
Valid Most 75 74.2 74.2 74.2

important
Important 26 25.8 25.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
18
INTERPERTATION
maximum percentage falls under Most important category (74.2%) and
the minimum percentage falls under Important category (25.8%)
Tax savings
Percent Percent
Valid Most 67 66.3 66.3 66.3

important
Important 34 33.7 33.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Education of kids
Percent Percent
Valid Most 79 78.2 78.2 78.2
important
Important 22 21.8 21.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Marriage of youngsters
Percent Percent
19
Valid Most 61 60.3 60.3 60.3
important
Important 40 59.7 59.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Meeting contingencies
Percent Percent
Valid Most 58 57.4 57.4 57.4

important
Important 43 42..6 42..6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Procurement for retirement life

Percent Percent
Valid Most 55 54.4 54.4 54.4
important
Important 46 45.6 45.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
20
Bank deposits
Percent Percent
Valid Most 58 57.4 57.4 57.4

important
Important 43 42.6 42.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Life insurance
Percent Percent
Valid Most 79 78.2 78.2 78.2
important
Important 22 21.8 21.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Chits
Percent Percent
Valid Most 48 47.7 47.7 47.7

important
Important 53 52.3 52.3 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
21
INTERPERTATION
maximum percentage falls under Important category (52.3%) and the
minimum percentage falls under Most important category (47.7%)
Mutual funds
Percent Percent
Valid Most 74 73.2 73.2 73.2
important
Important 27 26.8 26.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Gold and stone

Percent Percent
Valid Most 74 73.2 73.2 73.2
important
Important 27 26.8 26.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
22
Shares
Percent Percent
Valid Most 49 48.5 48.5 48.5
important
Important 52 51.5 51.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Postal deposits
Percent Percent
Valid Most 61 60.3 60.3 60.3
important
Important 40 39.7 39.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Real estate
Percent Percent
Valid Most 46 45.5 45.5 45.5
important
Important 55 54.5 54.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
23
INTERPERTATION
Bonds and debentures

Percent Percent
Valid Most 51 50.4 50.4 50.4
important
Important 50 49.6 49.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Pension and PF
Percent Percent
Valid Most 57 56.4 56.4 56.4
importan
t
Important 44 43.6 43.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
24
Small savings
Percent Percent
Valid Most 79 78.2 78.2 78.2
important
Important 22 21.8 21.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Company deposits
Percent Percent
Valid Most 52 51.5 51.5 51.5

important
Important 49 48.5 48.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
25
Arts funds
Percen Percent
t
Valid Most 42 41.5 41.5 41.5
important
Important 59 58.5 58.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Source of influence of investment decisions

Percent Percent
Valid Own particular venture 36 35.6 35.6 35.6
choice
Guidance from family 24 23.8 23.8 59.4
members
Financial specialists 39 38.6 38.6 98.0
Companions and 2 2.0 2.0 100.0
relatives
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
financial specialists’ category (38.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Companions and
relatives’ category (2.0%)
26
Your risk tolerance?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid High 35 34.6 34.6 34.6

Low 18 17.9 17.9 52.5
Mode 100.0
48 47.5 47.5
rate
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Moderate category (47.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Low category (17.9%)
A. differentiated portfolio diminishes hazard (risk).

Percent
Valid Strongly 5.0

5 5.0 5.0
Disagree
Disagree 4 4.0 4.0 9.0
Natural 24 23.8 23.8 32.8
Agree 38 37.6 37.6 70.5
Strongly 100.0
30 29.5 29.5
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Agree category (37.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Disagree category (4.0%)
27
B. The higher speculations yield or rate of return, the more prominentis
its related risk
Percent
Valid strongly 5.0

5 5.0 5.0
Disagree
Disagree 4 4.0 4.0 9.0
Natural 26 25.7 25.7 34.7
Agree 37 36.6 36.6 71.3
Strongly 100.0
29 28.7 28.7
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Agree category (36.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under strongly Disagree category
(5.0%)
C. The more commonplace a speculation, the less dangerous it’s

Percent Percent
Valid strongly 23.7

24 23.7 23.7
Disagree
Disagree 38 37.6 37.8 61.5
Natural 14 13.8 13.8 75.3
Agree 15 14.8 14.8 90.1
Strongly 100.0
10 9.9 9.9
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Disagree category (37.8%) and the minimum percentage falls under Strongly Agree category
(9.9%)
28
D. My methodology is to be wary and maintain a strategic distance
from all unsafe speculation
Percent
Valid strongly 13.8

14 13.8 13.8
Disagree
Disagree 11 10.8 10.8 24.6
Natural 21 20.8 20.8 45.4
Agree 30 29.8 29.8 75.2
Strongly 100.0
25 24.8 24.8
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Agree category (29.8%) and the minimum percentage falls under Disagree category (10.8%)
E. The need to exchange rapidly restricts me from considering more

unsafe items
Percent
Valid strongly 8.9
9 8.9 8.9
Disagree
Disagree 10 9.9 9.9 18.8
Natural 16 15.8 15.8 34.6
Agree 42 41.5 41.5 76.1
Strongly 100.0
24 23.9 23.9
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Strongly Agree category (23.9%) and the minimum percentage falls under strongly Disagree
category (8.9%)
29
F. The more cash one has, the more speculation hazard one can take.
Percent
Valid strongly 19.8

20 19.8 19.8
Disagree
Disagree 30 29.7 29.7 49.5
Natural 25 24.7 24.7 74.2
Agree 14 13.9 13.9 88.1
Strongly 100.0
12 11.9 11.9
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Disagree category (29.7%) and the minimum percentage falls under Strongly Agree category (11.9
%)
G. My agent chooses the best speculation level for me.

Percent Percent
Valid strongly 27.7

28 27.7 27.7
Disagree
Disagree 34 33.9 33.9 61.6
Natural 17 16.8 16.8 78.4
Agree 11 10.8 10.8 89.2
Strongly 100.0
11 10.8 10.8
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Disagree category (33.9%) and the minimum percentage falls under Strongly Agree category
(10.8%)
30
H. An investment that includes a lot of hazards isn't generally venture,
it's gaming.
Percent
Valid strongly 33.6

34 33.6 33.6
Disagree
Disagree 27 26.8 26.8 60.4
Natural 16 15.8 15.8 76.2
Agree 10 9.9 9.9 86.1
Strongly 100.0
14 13.9 13.9
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
strongly Disagree category (33.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Agree category
(9.9%)
I. The more established individuals take lesser investment risk

Percent
Valid strongly 33.6
34 33.6 33.6
Disagree
Disagree 28 27.7 27.7 61.3
Natural 10 9.9 9.9 71.2
Agree 20 19.9 19.9 91.1
Strongly 100.0
9 8.9 8.9
Agree
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
strongly Disagree category (33.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Strongly Agree
category (8.9%)
31
How much you invest in Mutual Funds (% to total investment)
Percent Percent
Valid 25% - 50 % 44 43.6 43.6 43.6

25% - 50% 29 28.7 28.7 72.3
50% - 75% 20 19.8 19.8 92.1
75% - 100% 8 7.9 7.9 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
25% - 50 % category (43.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under 75% - 100% category
(7.9%)
Market Risk
Percent Percent
Valid Not aware 12 11.9 11.9 11.9
Somewhat 4 4.0 4.0 15.9
aware
partially aware 22 21.7 21.7 37.6
aware 39 38.6 38.6 76.2
Fully aware 24 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage
fallsunder Aware category (38.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Somewhat
aware category (4.0%)
Credit Risk
Percent Percent
Valid Not aware 5 4.9 4.9 4.9
Somewhat 20 19.8 19.8 24.7
aware
32
aware 27 26.7 26.7 58.3
Fully aware 42 41.7 41.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Fully aware category (41.7%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not aware category (4.9%)
Inflation risk
Percent Percent
Somewhat 15 14.9 14.9 20.8
aware
aware 29 28.8 28.8 86.2
Fully aware 14 13.8 13.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Partially aware category (36.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not aware category
(5.9%)
Interest rate risk

Percent Percent

Somewhat 12 11.9 11.9 17.8
aware
aware 30 29.7 29.7 68.3
Fully aware 32 31.7 31.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
33
INTERPERTATION
Investment risk
Percent Percent

Somewhat 7 6.9 6.9 12.8
aware
aware 46 45.5 45.5 65.2
Fully aware 35 34.8 34.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Aware category (45.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not aware category (5.9%)
Liquidity risk
Percent Percent

Somewhat 19 18.8 18.8 24.7
aware
aware 27 26.7 26.8 72.3
Fully aware 28 27.7 27.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
34
Change in the government Policies
Percent Percent

Somewhat 7 6.9 6.9 9.9
aware
aware 51 50.5 50.5 83.2
Fully aware 17 16.8 16.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Aware category (50.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not aware category (3.0%)
Safety
Percent Percent
Valid Not at all 5 5.0 5.0 5.0
Not Preferred 4 4.0 4.0 9.0

Somewhat 22 21.7 21.7 30.7
preferred
Preferred 47 46.5 46.5 77.2
Most Preferred 23 22.8 22.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Preferred category (46.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not at all category (5.0%)
35
Liquidity
Percent Percent

Somewhat 21 20.8 20.8 30.7
preferred
Preferred 34 33.7 33.7 64.4
Most Preferred 36 35.6 35.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Most Preferred category (35.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not at all category
(4.0%)
Capital admiration
Percent Percent
Somewhat 30 29.6 29.6 36.6
preferred
Preferred 31 30.7 30.7 67.3
Most Preferred 33 32.7 32.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
(3.0%)
36
Professional Management
Percent Percent

Somewhat 21 20.8 20.8 28.8
preferred
Preferred 30 29.6 29.6 58.4
Most Preferred 42 41.6 41.6 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
(3.0%)
Flexibility
Percent Percent

Not Preferred 13 12.9 12.9 15.9
Somewhat 19 18.8 18.8 34.7
preferred
Preferred 41 40.5 40.5 75.2
Most Preferred 25 24.8 24.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Preferred category (40.5 %) and the minimum percentage falls under Not at all category (3.0%)
37
Regular Income
Percent Percent

Somewhat 36 35.6 35.6 42.6
preferred
Preferred 41 40.6 40.6 83.2
Most Preferred 17 16.8 16.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Preferred category (40.6%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not at all category (3.0%)
Diversification Benefits
Percent Percent

Not Preferred 16 15.8 15.8 17.8
Somewhat 28 27.7 27.7 45.5
preferred
Preferred 32 31.7 31.7 77.2
Most Preferred 23 22.8 22.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
Preferred category (31.7%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not at all category (2.0%
Tax reimbursement
Percent Percent
38
Somewhat 19 18.8 18.8 24.8
preferred
Preferred 45 44.5 44.5 69.3
Most Preferred 31 30.7 30.7 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage falls underPreferred
category (44.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under Not Preferred category (2.0%)
Are you willing you to invest in mutual funds in future?

Percent
Valid Yes 46 45.5 45.5 45.5
No 55 54.5 54.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage falls underYes
category (45.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under No category (54.5%)
Do you think that mutual fund investment?

Percent
Valid Yes 46 45.5 45.5 45.5
No 55 54.5 54.5 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERTATION
As the above table shows the percentage of the respondents, the maximum percentage falls underYes
category (54.5%) and the minimum percentage falls under No category (45.5%)
39
3.2 SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGE(SMA)
The following are the results that are obtained by using SMA tool for the collected data.
TABLE NO:3.2.1
SMA ANALYSIS FOR Zee.ns 2018-2023

S.NO DATE CLOSE SMA VOLUME SMA
1 15-11-2018 477.45 448.8357 2526406 2970493.857
2 27-05-2019 341.05 360.4679 13387434 23342503.5
3 03-12-2019 283.45 301.8214 28025661 37134987.07
4 10-06-2020 165 185.2893 17134647 31827977.79
5 08-12-2020 215.4 203.475 19510057 20324688.21
6 15-06-2021 221.95 220.1893 44025606 28290537.5
7 17-12-2021 347.8 355.6786 29550773 21889348.14
8 22-06-2022 214.75 225.5286 7112101 8880898.643
9 26-12-2022 239.05 253.4929 5052693 5273820
CHART NO:3.2.1
SMA PRICE OF ZEE.NS
ZEE.NS
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
close SMA
40
SMA VOLUME OF ZEE.NS
ZEE.NS
50000000
45000000
40000000
35000000
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
01-01-2021
01-11-2018
01-01-2019
01-03-2019
01-05-2019
01-07-2019
01-09-2019
01-11-2019
01-01-2020
01-03-2020
01-05-2020
01-07-2020
01-09-2020
01-11-2020
01-03-2021
01-05-2021
01-07-2021
01-09-2021
01-11-2021
01-01-2022
01-03-2022
01-05-2022
01-07-2022
01-09-2022
01-11-2022
volume sma
INTERPRETATION:
The above chart shows the data that are obtained for the year of 2018 - 2023 by performing 14 days simple moving
average. The lowest value of SMA Price was 203.475 and, highest value of SMA was 448.8357. The lowest value
of SMA Volume was 2526406 and highest value of SMA Volume was 44025606.
TABALE NO:3.2.2
SMA ANALYSIS FOR SUNTV.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 912.25 0 1054505 0
2 19-12-2018 596.9 580.9821 1470396 1958626.5
3 27-06-2019 508.1 523.4357 3890619 2292860.214
4 02-01-2020 434.2 447.4036 6011135 1680204.357
5 08-07-2020 390.5 401.5786 3669212 3056734.857
6 05-01-2021 491.95 485.55 2618522 2790623.571
7 09-07-2021 521.9 531.825 855558 1873927.071
8 11-01-2022 517.55 501.2179 1032550 777759.8571
9 14-07-2022 417.8 423.2321 542946 1067984.643
10 16-01-2023 482.45 480.6536 294909 563313.5
41
CHART NO:3.2.2
0
100
200
300
500
600
700
800
900
1000
400
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
Close
42
01-09-2020
SUNTV
01-12-2020
sma 01-03-2021
01-06-2021
SMA PRICE OF SUNTV
01-09-2021
SMA VOLUME OF SUNTV

01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
TABLE NO:3.2.3
SMA ANALYSIS FOR TV18BRDCST.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 56.85 0 4886648 0
2 19-12-2018 37.2 35.33929 4577298 2411123
3 27-06-2019 24.35 25.64643 20285232 8209689
4 02-01-2020 22.3 21.60357 3218907 1534587
5 08-07-2020 34.4 35.83571 3173084 7619460
6 05-01-2021 30.9 31.24643 2976713 6527017
7 09-07-2021 41.75 43.08571 4110671 9913016
8 11-01-2022 45.9 45.41071 4509969 7004730
9 14-07-2022 38.25 38.91071 4759962 7253269
10 16-01-2023 37.05 37.06071 5979679 3739833
CHART NO:3.2.3
SMA PRICE OF TV18BRDCST.NS
TV18BRDCST.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-09-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
43
SMA VOLUME OF TV18BRDCST.NS
TV18BRDCST.NS
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
01-12-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
Interpretation:
The above chart shows the data that are obtained for the year of 2018 – 2023 by performing
14 days simple moving average. The lowest value of SMA Price was 21.60357 highest value
of SMA was 45.41071. The lowest value of SMA Volume was 1534587 and highest value
of SMA Volume was 9913016.
TABALE NO:3.2.4
SMA ANALTSIS FOR NETWORK18.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 44.8 0 649810 0
2 19-12-2018 38.9 38.49286 258612 229987.1
3 27-06-2019 27.75 28.02143 83165 155845.1
4 02-01-2020 25.25 25.30714 1101983 158698.9
5 08-07-2020 40.4 42.46786 1137583 3821607
6 05-01-2021 36.5 36.72857 3169798 2170301
7 09-07-2021 52.45 51.17143 1803285 2799605
8 11-01-2022 89.35 90.09643 745909 1241627
9 14-07-2022 69.75 67.44643 876083 2261050
10 16-01-2023 65.45 65.41786 1058594 910338.6
44
CHART NO:3.2.4
SMA PRICE OF NETWORK.NS
NETWORK18.NS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
SMA VOLUME OF NETWORK
NETWORK18.NS
4500000
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
01-12-2018
01-12-2019
01-12-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
Interpretation:
The above chart shows the data that are obtained for the year of 2018 – 2023 by
performing 14 days simple moving average. The lowest value of SMA Price was 1241627
highest value of SMA was 90.09643 . The lowest value of SMA Volume was 1241627 and
highest value of SMA Volume was 910338.6.
45
TABALE NO:3.2.5
SMA ANALTSIS FOR NDTV.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 34 0 20301 0
2 19-12-2018 35.85 35.77857 14741 27982.29
3 27-06-2019 34.65 34.85714 28996 34554.79
4 02-01-2020 27.6 26.46429 40372 9027.286
5 08-07-2020 36.3 37.76786 9481 33665.21
6 05-01-2021 41.4 39.86786 30576 43176.07
7 09-07-2021 73.6 71.625 104605 52016.43
8 11-01-2022 119.7 118.475 122239 181895.3
9 14-07-2022 193.85 179.7464 864432 695203.6
10 16-01-2023 296.95 319.6857 349906 936662.1
CHART NO:3.2.5
SMA PRICE OF NDTV.NS
NDTV.NS
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
01-06-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
46
SMA VOLUME OF NDTV.NS
NDTV.NS
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
01-12-2018
01-12-2019
01-12-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
Interpretation:
The above chart shows the data that are obtained for the year of 2018 - 2023 by
performing 14 days simple moving average. The lowest value of SMA Price was 71.625
highest value of SMA was 39.86786. The lowest value of SMA Volume was 27982.29 and
47
TABALE NO:3.2.6
SMA ANALYSIS FOR TVTODAY.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE CLOSE SMA
VOLUME SMA
1 14-06-2018 459.25 0
40136 0
2 19-12-2018 372.75 375.8393
14051 14473.93
3 27-06-2019 268.2 260.4214
46857 53203
4 02-01-2020 251.75 243.9357
60820 19824.86
5 08-07-2020 207.35 193.4857
228601 140588.9
6 05-01-2021 223.85 221.9964
61948 113001.8
7 09-07-2021 302.9 301.3429
34192 129129.2
8 11-01-2022 404.35 421.8714
81185 110677.4
9 14-07-2022 264.6 263.7714
30027 69430.93
10 16-01-2023 256.6 249.9321
100281 136478.1
CHART NO:3.2.6
SMA PRICE OF TVTODAY.NS
TVTODAY.NS
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
01-12-2019
01-06-2018
01-08-2018
01-10-2018
01-12-2018
01-02-2019
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-02-2020
01-04-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-10-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
01-08-2021
01-10-2021
01-12-2021
01-02-2022
01-04-2022
01-06-2022
01-08-2022
01-10-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
48
SMA VOLUME OF TVTODAY.NS
TVTODAY.NS
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
01-12-2018
01-06-2022
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
INTERPRETATION:
highest value of SMA was 421.8714. The lowest value of SMA Volume was 53203 and
TABALE NO:3.2.7
SMA ANALYSIS FOR ENIL.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 682.85 0 1821 0
2 19-12-2018 595.7 603.1393 2551 1839.643
3 27-06-2019 430.8 431.8786 218973 20367.21
4 02-01-2020 261.9 244.6893 4033 4196.429
5 08-07-2020 133.3 147.5893 15130 27886.21
6 05-01-2021 181.75 164.7393 573864 412491.9
7 09-07-2021 185.85 179.7429 92418 187081.1
8 11-01-2022 171.6 170.5786 15934 23820.64
9 14-07-2022 180.05 177.9393 28388 11367.86
10 16-01-2023 149.45 150.5321 5536 14954
49
CHART NO:3.2.7
SMA PRICE OF ENIL.NS
ENIL.NS
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
01-06-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
SMA VOLUME OF ENIL.NS
ENIL.NS
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
01-12-2018
01-06-2022
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
Interpretation:
50
TABALE NO:3.2.8
SMA ANALYSIS FOR ZEEMEDIA.NS 2018-2023

1 10-06-2018 31.2 0 305911 0
2 14-10-2018 24.3 23.47857 187478 194295.1
3 17-02-2019 12.35 12.20357 647742 787290.5
4 23-06-2019 6.05 6.260714 331289 409753.1
5 27-10-2019 6.35 6.585714 2655612 1892531
6 01-03-2020 5.85 6.135714 4080817 3510682
7 05-07-2020 13.05 11.89286 1995831 5086675
8 08-11-2020 17.45 14.30357 29984472 5843028
9 14-03-2021 13.85 14.00714 379968 782569
10 18-07-2021 14 14.52143 676545 764915.4
CHART NO:3.2.8
SMA PRICE OF ZEEMEDIA.NS
ZEEMEDIA.NS
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
01-08-2018
01-06-2018
01-10-2018
01-12-2018
01-02-2019
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-12-2019
01-02-2020
01-04-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-10-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
close sma
51
SMA VOLUME OF ZEEMEDIAM.NS
ZEEMEDIA.NS
35000000
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
01-12-2018
01-10-2020
01-06-2018
01-08-2018
01-10-2018
01-02-2019
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-12-2019
01-02-2020
01-04-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
volume sma
Interpretation:
highest value of SMA was23.47857. The lowest value of SMA Volume was 782569 and
highest value of SMA Volume was787290.5.
TABALE NO:3.2.9
SMA ANALYSIS FOR RADIOCITY.NS 2018-2023

1 22-06-2018 50.824 51.75829 17681 178560.4
2 28-12-2018 50.008 51.12857 53206 202881.4
3 05-07-2019 46.24 46.08857 69868 69262.71
4 10-01-2020 22.4 22.56 55706 68311.93
5 16-07-2020 15.9 17.02143 607010 960789.5
6 13-01-2021 23.65 23.67143 144577 149688.4
7 19-07-2021 25.5 25.76429 555557 702617.4
8 19-01-2022 24.2 24.38214 358616 607130.6
9 22-07-2022 23.8 23.32143 102728 113893.6
10 24-01-2023 16 21.11786 342851 2057447
52
0
10
20
30
40
60
50
01-06-2018
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
01-09-2018
01-06-2018
01-09-2018 01-12-2018
01-12-2018 01-03-2019
01-03-2019 01-06-2019
CHART NO:3.2.9
01-06-2019 01-09-2019
01-09-2019 01-12-2019
01-12-2019 01-03-2020
01-03-2020 01-06-2020
close
volume
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
SMA PRICE OF RADIOCITY.NS
01-12-2020
RADIOCITY.NS
01-03-2021
sma
SMA VOLUME OF RADIOCITY.NS
sma
01-03-2021
RADIOCITY.NS
01-06-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
53
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022 01-03-2022
01-06-2022 01-06-2022
01-09-2022 01-09-2022
01-12-2022 01-12-2022
Interpretation:
highest value of SMA was51.75829. The lowest value of SMA Volume was 113893.6 and
TABALE NO:3.2.10
SMA ANALYSIS OF RAJTV.NS 2018-2023

1 14-06-2018 50.85 0 2880 0
2 19-12-2018 42.75 45.16786 2816 2235.286
3 27-06-2019 44.5 44.225 1 2994.571
4 02-01-2020 43.45 42.89286 396 2824.643
5 08-07-2020 34.5 35.41071 2290 2807.929
6 05-01-2021 37.75 37.22857 42205 61023.86
7 09-07-2021 53.45 50.51786 7857 232999.6
8 11-01-2022 49.6 43.03571 36894 56673.14
9 14-07-2022 36.45 36.87857 3183 2833.143
10 16-01-2023 51.65 55.20357 3273 48393
CHART NO:3.2.10
SMA PRICE OF RAJTV.NS
RAJTV.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
close sma
54
SMA VOLUME OF RAJTV.NS
RAJTV.NS
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
01-12-2018
01-06-2022
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
volume sma
Interpretation:
3.2 RELATIVE STRENGHT INDEX (RSI)
The following are the result that are obtained by using RSI tool for the collected data.
TABALE NO:3.3.1
RSI ANALYSIS OF ZEE.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 15-11-2018 55.95682
2 27-05-2019 48.66342
3 03-12-2019 49.3709
4 10-06-2020 48.7227
5 08-12-2020 45.54127
6 15-06-2021 48.48752
7 17-12-2021 58.97094
8 22-06-2022 48.98021
9 26-12-2022 48.54662
55
CHART NO:3.3.1
RSI OF ZEE.NS
ZEE.NS
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
RSI
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reaches the upper limit is 55,49,48. From the above data
the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 45.54,48.66,48.54,.
TABALE NO:3.3.2
RSI ANALYSIS OF SUNTV.NS 2018-2023
S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 48.29216
3 27-06-2019 56.00378
4 02-01-2020 67.21618
5 08-07-2020 52.40137
6 05-01-2021 48.31278
7 09-07-2021 44.24084
8 11-01-2022 50.82591
9 14-07-2022 46.33913
10 16-01-2023 46.75175
56
CHART NO:3.3.2
RSI OF SUNTV.NS
SUNTV.NS
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reaches the upper limit is67,54,52. From the above data
the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 44,46,48.
TABALE NO:3.3.3
RSI ANALYSIS OF TV18BRDCST.NS 2018-

2023
S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 57.62312
3 27-06-2019 70.72346
4 02-01-2020 54.29129
5 08-07-2020 45.29017
6 05-01-2021 45.81197
7 09-07-2021 44.85416
8 11-01-2022 44.84262
9 14-07-2022 44.44908
10 16-01-2023 49.74636
57
CHART NO:3.3.3
RSI OF TV18BRDCST.NS
TV18BRDCST.NS
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 70,57,54. From the
above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 44.41,44.32,44.51.
TABALE NO:3.3.4
RSI ANALYSIS OF NETWORK18.NS 2018-

2023
S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 49.39202
3 27-06-2019 46.31067
4 02-01-2020 56.81359
5 08-07-2020 44.9688
6 05-01-2021 55.8515
7 09-07-2021 46.92993
8 11-01-2022 45.39601
9 14-07-2022 46.42681
10 16-01-2023 48.6997
58
CHART NO:3.3.4
RSI OF NETWORK.NS
NETWORK18.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit it56,55,49. From the above data
the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 44,11.46,26.47,47.
TABALE NO:3.3.5
RSI ANALYSIS OF NDTV.NS 2018-2023
S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 48.30615
3 27-06-2019 49.28133
4 02-01-2020 58.77481
5 08-07-2020 45.86142
6 05-01-2021 47.73236
7 09-07-2021 52.438
8 11-01-2022 46.18056
9 14-07-2022 50.95156
10 16-01-2023 44.91342
59
CHART NO:3.3.5
RSI OF NDTV.NS
NDTV.NS
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit it 58,50,49. From the
above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 44.45,47.
TABALE NO:3.3.6
RSI ANALYSIS OF TVTODAY.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 48.54077
3 27-06-2019 49.16371
4 02-01-2020 56.07645
5 08-07-2020 54.96538
6 05-01-2021 47.47088
7 09-07-2021 46.17959
8 11-01-2022 47.15277
9 14-07-2022 47.45418
10 16-01-2023 49.41206
60
CHART NO:3.3.6
RSI OF TVTODAY.NS
TVTODAY.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit it56,54,49. From the
above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 46,47,49.
TABALE NO:3.3.7
RSI ANALYSIS OF ENIL.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 50.58241
3 27-06-2019 86.48674
4 02-01-2020 47.94846
5 08-07-2020 48.97221
6 05-01-2021 53.44658
7 09-07-2021 46.83386
8 11-01-2022 46.67166
9 14-07-2022 54.0855
10 16-01-2023 45.16349
61
CHART NO:3.3.7
RSI OF ENIL.NS
ENIL.NS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 45,46,47.
TABALE NO:3.3.8
RSI ANALYSIS OFZEEMEDIA.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 10-06-2018 0
2 14-10-2018 53.86925
3 17-02-2019 44.21861
4 23-06-2019 35.53576
5 27-10-2019 49.75976
6 01-03-2020 50.12573
7 05-07-2020 67.10356
8 08-11-2020 79.1608
9 14-03-2021 43.48222
10 18-07-2021 34.03886
62
CHART NO:3.3.8
RSI OF ZEEMEDIA.NS
ZEEMEDIA.NS
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-08-2018
01-06-2018
01-10-2018
01-12-2018
01-02-2019
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-12-2019
01-02-2020
01-04-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-10-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
rsi
Interpretation:
above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the Lower limit is 44,11.46,26.47,47.
TABALE NO:3.3.9
RSI ANALYSIS OF RADIOCITY.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 22-06-2018 48.07793
2 28-12-2018 47.30865
3 05-07-2019 48.786
4 10-01-2020 48.5877
5 16-07-2020 47.23619
6 13-01-2021 48.38047
7 19-07-2021 46.82119
8 19-01-2022 48.06184
9 22-07-2022 48.49119
10 24-01-2023 46.33241
63
CHART NO:3.3.9
RSI OF RADIOCITY.NS
RADIOCITY.NS
49
48.5
48
47.5
47
46.5
46
45.5
45
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.3.10
RSI ANALYSIS OF RAJTV.NS 2018-2023

S.NO DATE RSI
1 14-06-2018 0
2 19-12-2018 46.81094
3 27-06-2019 46.25523
4 02-01-2020 46.21938
5 08-07-2020 47.22099
6 05-01-2021 50.70935
7 09-07-2021 46.14312
8 11-01-2022 49.002
9 14-07-2022 49.51103
10 16-01-2023 46.94005
64
CHART NO:3.3.10
RSI OF RAJTV
RAJTV.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
rsi
Interpretation:
From the above data the RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit it 50,49,49. From the
3.4 MONEY FLOW INDEX

TABALE NO:3.4.1
ANALYSIS FOR ZEE.NS USING MONEY FLOW INDEX

S.NO DATE VOLUME MONEY MOVING
FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 15-11-2018 2526406 64.58384498 28.61429471
2 27-05-2019 13387434 46.83746753 19.41786829
3 03-12-2019 28025661 45.16191345 18.37141657
4 10-06-2020 17134647 51.3286882 20.28928486
5 08-12-2020 19510057 53.43130764 11.92499443
6 15-06-2021 44025606 45.91198645 1.760710643
7 17-12-2021 29550773 46.12479767 7.878581286
8 22-06-2022 7112101 45.15312448 10.778571
9 26-12-2022 5052693 46.53761112 14.44285264
65
CHART NO:3.4.1
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF ZEE.NS
ZEE.NS
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Interpretation:
The above data visual of Awesome Oscillator indicates the volatility of the stock prices in the market
over the period 2018 – 2023. The highest value during the period was 45.15 and the lowest value
during the period was 64.58.
TABALE NO:3.4.2
ANALYSIS FOR SUNTV.NS USING MONEY FLOW

INDEX
S.NO DATE VOLUME MONEY MOVING
FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 1054505 0 0
2 19-12-2018 1470396 48.29216 15.91788
3 27-06-2019 3890619 56.00378 15.33571
4 02-01-2020 6011135 67.21618 13.20356
5 08-07-2020 3669212 52.40137 11.07857
6 05-01-2021 2618522 48.31278 6.400011
7 09-07-2021 855558 44.24084 9.924984
8 11-01-2022 1032550 50.82591 16.33213
9 14-07-2022 542946 46.33913 5.432151
10 16-01-2023 294909 46.75175 1.796437
66
CHART NO:3.4.2
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF SUNTV.NS
SUNTV.NS
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
over the period 2018 – 2023. The highest value during the period was 44.24and the lowest value during
the period was 67.21.
TABALE NO:3.4.3
ANALYSIS FOR TV18BRDCST.NS USING MONEY FLOW INDEX

S.NO DATE MONEY MOVING AVE
VOLUME FIOW INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 4886648 0 0
2 19-12-2018 4577298 57.62311677 1.860714929
3 27-06-2019 20285232 70.72345805 1.296428643
4 02-01-2020 3218907 54.29129484 0.696427643
5 08-07-2020 3173084 45.29017239 1.435712357
6 05-01-2021 2976713 45.81197102 0.346428714
7 09-07-2021 4110671 44.85415684 1.335714714
8 11-01-2022 4509969 44.84262093 0.489287357
9 14-07-2022 4759962 44.44907945 0.660713929
10 16-01-2023 5979679 49.7463648 0.010715143
67
CHART NO:3.4.3
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF TV18BRDCST.NS
TV18BRDCST.NS
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
over the period 2018 – 2023. The highest value during the period was 44.44and the lowest value during
TABALE NO:3.4.4
ANALYSIS FOR NETWORK18.NS USING MONEY

FLOW INDEX
S.NO DATE MONEY MOVING
FLOW AVE
VOLUME INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 649810 0 0
2 19-12-2018 258612 49.39202 0.407144
3 27-06-2019 83165 46.31067 0.271429
4 02-01-2020 1101983 56.81359 0.057143
5 08-07-2020 1137583 44.9688 2.067855
6 05-01-2021 3169798 55.8515 0.228572
7 09-07-2021 1803285 46.92993 1.278573
8 11-01-2022 745909 45.39601 0.746431
9 14-07-2022 876083 46.42681 2.303571
10 16-01-2023 1058594 48.6997 0.03214
68
CHART NO:3.4.4
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF NETWORK18.NS
NETWORK18.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.4.5
ANALYSIS FOR NDTV.NS USING MONEY FLOW

INDEX
FLOW AVE
1 14-06-2018 20301 0 0
2 19-12-2018 14741 48.30615 0.071427
3 27-06-2019 28996 49.28133 0.207141
4 02-01-2020 40372 58.77481 1.135714
5 08-07-2020 9481 45.86142 1.467858
6 05-01-2021 30576 47.73236 1.532145
7 09-07-2021 104605 52.438 1.974998
8 11-01-2022 122239 46.18056 1.224997
9 14-07-2022 864432 50.95156 14.10358
10 16-01-2023 349906 44.91342 22.7357
69
CHART NO:3.4.5
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF NDTV.NS
NDTV.NS
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.4.6
ANALYSIS FOR TVTODAY.NS USING MONEY FLOW INDEX

VOLUME FLOW INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 40136 0 0
2 19-12-2018 14051 48.54077103 3.089285714
3 27-06-2019 46857 49.16371322 7.778580643
4 02-01-2020 60820 56.07644668 7.814285286
5 08-07-2020 228601 54.96538314 13.86429257
6 05-01-2021 61948 47.47088076 1.853577643
7 09-07-2021 34192 46.17959181 1.557137714
8 11-01-2022 81185 47.1527717 17.52142343
9 14-07-2022 30027 47.4541846 0.828577214
10 16-01-2023 100281 49.41206287 6.667861857
70
CHART NO:3.4.6
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF TVTODAY.NS
TVTODAY.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-02-2019
01-04-2020
01-06-2018
01-08-2018
01-10-2018
01-12-2018
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-12-2019
01-02-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-10-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
01-08-2021
01-10-2021
01-12-2021
01-02-2022
01-04-2022
01-06-2022
01-08-2022
01-10-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
The above data visual of Awesome Oscillator indicates the volatility of the stock prices in themarket
TABALE NO:3.4.7
ANALYSIS FOR ENIL.NS USING MONEY FLOW

INDEX
FLOW AVE
1 14-06-2018 1821 0 0
2 19-12-2018 2551 50.58241 7.439275
3 27-06-2019 218973 86.48674 1.078578
4 02-01-2020 4033 47.94846 17.21071
5 08-07-2020 15130 48.97221 14.28928
6 05-01-2021 573864 53.44658 17.01071
7 09-07-2021 92418 46.83386 6.107147
8 11-01-2022 15934 46.67166 1.021435
9 14-07-2022 28388 54.0855 2.110719
10 16-01-2023 5536 45.16349 1.082146
CHART NO:3.4.7
71
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF ENIL.NS
ENIL.NS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-06-2019
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
The above data visual of Awesome Oscillator indicates the volatility of the stock prices in themarket
TABALE NO:3.4.8
ANALYSIS FOR ZEEMEDIA.NS USING MONEY FLOW

INDEX
FLOW AVE
1 10-06-2018 305911 0 0
2 14-10-2018 187478 48.44502 0.821427
3 17-02-2019 647742 47.68762 0.146429
4 23-06-2019 331289 46.5981 0.210714
5 27-10-2019 2655612 52.30633 0.235714
6 01-03-2020 4080817 50.30802 0.285714
7 05-07-2020 1995831 46.01105 1.157143
8 08-11-2020 29984472 76.92146 3.146429
9 14-03-2021 379968 44.65652 0.157143
10 18-07-2021 676545 46.96378 0.521429
CHART NO:3.4.8
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF ZEEMEDIA.NS
72
ZEEMEDIA.NS
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01-08-2018
01-06-2018
01-10-2018
01-12-2018
01-02-2019
01-04-2019
01-06-2019
01-08-2019
01-10-2019
01-12-2019
01-02-2020
01-04-2020
01-06-2020
01-08-2020
01-10-2020
01-12-2020
01-02-2021
01-04-2021
01-06-2021
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.4.9
ANALYSIS FOR RADIOCITY.NS USING MONEY

FLOW INDEX
FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
VOLUME Q
1 22-06-2018 17681 48.07793 2.086287
2 28-12-2018 53206 47.30865 0.739999
3 05-07-2019 69868 48.786 0.157141
4 10-01-2020 55706 48.5877 0.582858
5 16-07-2020 607010 47.23619 0.978572
6 13-01-2021 144577 48.38047 0.582143
7 19-07-2021 555557 46.82119 0.417858
8 19-01-2022 358616 48.06184 0.282143
9 22-07-2022 102728 48.49119 0.571429
10 24-01-2023 342851 46.33241 4.946429
CHART NO:3.4.9
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF RADIOCITY.NS
73
RADIOCITY.NS
49
48.5
48
47.5
47
46.5
46
45.5
45
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-06-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.4.10
ANALYSIS FOR RAJTV.NS USING MONEY FLOW

INDEX
FLOW AVE
1 14-06-2018 2880 0 0
2 19-12-2018 2816 46.81094 2.417857
3 27-06-2019 1 46.25523 0.275
4 02-01-2020 396 46.21938 0.557144
5 08-07-2020 2290 47.22099 0.910714
6 05-01-2021 42205 50.70935 0.521429
7 09-07-2021 7857 46.14312 2.932144
8 11-01-2022 36894 49.002 6.564283
9 14-07-2022 3183 49.51103 0.42857
10 16-01-2023 3273 46.94005 3.55357
CHART NO:3.4.10
MONEY FLOW INDEX OF RAJTV.NS
74
RAJTV.NS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 01-06-2020
01-06-2018
01-09-2018
01-12-2018
01-03-2019
01-06-2019
01-09-2019
01-12-2019
01-03-2020
01-09-2020
01-12-2020
01-03-2021
01-06-2021
01-09-2021
01-12-2021
01-03-2022
01-06-2022
01-09-2022
01-12-2022
Interpretation:
3.5 MOVING AVE DEVIATION

TABALE NO:3.5.1
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR ZEE.NS

S.NO DATE CLOSE MONEY FLOW MOVING AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 15-11-2018 477.45 64.58384498 28.61429471
2 27-05-2019 341.05 46.83746753 19.41786829
3 03-12-2019 283.45 45.16191345 18.37141657
4 10-06-2020 165 51.3286882 20.28928486
5 08-12-2020 215.4 53.43130764 11.92499443
6 15-06-2021 221.95 45.91198645 1.760710643
7 17-12-2021 347.8 46.12479767 7.878581286
8 22-06-2022 214.75 45.15312448 10.778571
9 26-12-2022 239.05 46.53761112 14.44285264
CHART NO:3.5.1
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF ZEE.NS
75
Interpretation:
The above data shows the moving ave deviation analysis for the period of 2018 – 2023. The
highest value ofthe moving ave deviation during the period was 1.26 and the lowest value during
TABALE NO:3.5.2
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR SUNTV.NS

S.NO DATE CLOSE MONEY MOVING
FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 912.25 0 0
2 19-12-2018 596.9 48.29216 15.91788
3 27-06-2019 508.1 56.00378 15.33571
4 02-01-2020 434.2 67.21618 13.20356
5 08-07-2020 390.5 52.40137 11.07857
6 05-01-2021 491.95 48.31278 6.400011
7 09-07-2021 521.9 44.24084 9.924984
8 11-01-2022 517.55 50.82591 16.33213
9 14-07-2022 417.8 46.33913 5.432151
10 16-01-2023 482.45 46.75175 1.796437
CHART NO:3.5.2
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF SUNTV.NS
76
Interpretation:
The above data shows the moving ave deviation analysis for the period of 2018 – 2023. The highest
value ofthe moving ave deviation during the period was 1.79 and the lowest value during the period
was 16.33.
TABALE NO:3.5.3
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR TV18BRDCST.NS
FIOW DEVIATION
INDEX
1 14-06-2018 0 0
2 19-12-2018 57.62311677 1.860714929
3 27-06-2019 70.72345805 1.296428643
4 02-01-2020 54.29129484 0.696427643
5 08-07-2020 45.29017239 1.435712357
6 05-01-2021 45.81197102 0.346428714
7 09-07-2021 44.85415684 1.335714714
8 11-01-2022 44.84262093 0.489287357
9 14-07-2022 44.44907945 0.660713929
10 16-01-2023 49.7463648 0.010715143
CHART NO:3.5.3
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF TV18BRDCST.NS
77
Interpretation:
The above data shows the moving ave deviation analysis for the period of 2018 – 2023. The highest
value ofthe moving ave deviation during the period was 0.01 and the lowest value during the period
was 1.86.
TABALE NO:3.5.4
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR NETWORK.NS

MONEY FLOW MOVING AVE
DATE
INDEX DEVIATION
14-06-2018 0 0
19-12-2018 49.39202 0.407144
27-06-2019 46.31067 0.271429
02-01-2020 56.81359 0.057143
08-07-2020 44.9688 2.067855
05-01-2021 55.8515 0.228572
09-07-2021 46.92993 1.278573
11-01-2022 45.39601 0.746431
14-07-2022 46.42681 2.303571
16-01-2023 48.6997 0.03214
CHART NO:3.5.4
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF NETWORK.NS
78
Interpretation:
The above data shows the MOVING AVE DEVIATION analysis for the period of 2018 – 2023. The
highest value ofthe MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period was 0.27 and the lowest value
TABALE NO:3.5.5
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR NDTV.NS

MONEY MOVING AVE
S.NO DATE
FLOW INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 0 0
2 19-12-2018 48.30615 0.071427
3 27-06-2019 49.28133 0.207141
4 02-01-2020 58.77481 1.135714
5 08-07-2020 45.86142 1.467858
6 05-01-2021 47.73236 1.532145
7 09-07-2021 52.438 1.974998
8 11-01-2022 46.18056 1.224997
9 14-07-2022 50.95156 14.10358
10 16-01-2023 44.91342 22.7357
CHART NO:3.5.5
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF NDTV.NS
79
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.5.6
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR TVTODAY.NS

1 14-06-2018 0 0
2 19-12-2018 48.54077103 3.089285714
3 27-06-2019 49.16371322 7.778580643
4 02-01-2020 56.07644668 7.814285286
5 08-07-2020 54.96538314 13.86429257
6 05-01-2021 47.47088076 1.853577643
7 09-07-2021 46.17959181 1.557137714
8 11-01-2022 47.1527717 17.52142343
9 14-07-2022 47.4541846 0.828577214
10 16-01-2023 49.41206287 6.667861857
CHART NO:3.5.6
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF TVTODAY.NS
80
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.5.7
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR ENIL.NS

FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 14-06-2018 0 0
2 19-12-2018 50.58241 7.439275
3 27-06-2019 86.48674 1.078578
4 02-01-2020 47.94846 17.21071
5 08-07-2020 48.97221 14.28928
6 05-01-2021 53.44658 17.01071
7 09-07-2021 46.83386 6.107147
8 11-01-2022 46.67166 1.021435
9 14-07-2022 54.0855 2.110719
10 16-01-2023 45.16349 1.082146
CHART NO:3.5.7
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF ENIL.NS
81
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.5.8
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR

ZEEMEDIA.NS
FLOW AVE
INDEX DEVIATION
1 10-06-2018 0 0
2 14-10-2018 48.44502 0.821427
3 17-02-2019 47.68762 0.146429
4 23-06-2019 46.5981 0.210714
5 27-10-2019 52.30633 0.235714
6 01-03-2020 50.30802 0.285714
7 05-07-2020 46.01105 1.157143
8 08-11-2020 76.92146 3.146429
9 14-03-2021 44.65652 0.157143
10 18-07-2021 46.96378 0.521429
CHART NO:3.5.8
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF ZEEMEDIA.NS
82
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.5.9
MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR RADIOCITY.NS

S.NO DATE MONEY FLOW MOVING AVE
INDEX Q DEVIATION
1 22-06-2018 48.07793 2.086287
2 28-12-2018 47.30865 0.739999
3 05-07-2019 48.786 0.157141
4 10-01-2020 48.5877 0.582858
5 16-07-2020 47.23619 0.978572
6 13-01-2021 48.38047 0.582143
7 19-07-2021 46.82119 0.417858
8 19-01-2022 48.06184 0.282143
9 22-07-2022 48.49119 0.571429
10 24-01-2023 46.33241 4.946429
CHART NO:3.5.9MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF RADIOCITY.NS
83
Interpretation:
TABALE NO:3.5.10 MOVING AVE DEVIATION FOR RAJTV.NS
MONEY MOVING AVE
S.NO DATE
1 14-06-2018 0 0
2 19-12-2018 46.81094 2.417857
3 27-06-2019 46.25523 0.275
4 02-01-2020 46.21938 0.557144
5 08-07-2020 47.22099 0.910714
6 05-01-2021 50.70935 0.521429
7 09-07-2021 46.14312 2.932144
8 11-01-2022 49.002 6.564283
9 14-07-2022 49.51103 0.42857
10 16-01-2023 46.94005 3.55357
CHART NO:3.5.10
84
MOVING AVE DEVIATION OF RAJTV.NS
Interpretation:
85
CHAPTER - 1V
RESULTS
86
4.1 FINDINGS
1. The lowest value of ZEE.NS - SMA Price was 448.83 and, highest value of SMA was
973.86.
2. The lowest value of SUNTV.NS- SMA Price was 580.98and, highest value of SMA
was 777795.85.
3. The lowest value of TV18BRDCST.NS SMA Price was 45.41 and, highest value of
SMA Was 9913016.
4. The lowest value of NETWORK.NS - SMA Price was 90.09 and, highest value of SMA
was 910338.
5. The lowest value of NDTV.NS - SMA Price was 39.86 and, highest value of SMA was
936662.
6. The lowest value of TVTODAY.NS - SMA Price was 421.87 and, highest value of
SMA was 69430.93.
7. The lowest value of ENIL.NS- SMA Price was 603.13 and, highest value of SMA was
412491.9.
8. The lowest value of ZEE MEDIA.NS - SMA Price was 23.47 and, highest value of
SMA was 797290.5.
9. The lowest value of RADIO CITY.NS - SMA Price was 51.75 and, highest value of
SMA was 960789.5.
10.The lowest value of RAJ TV. NS - SMA Price was 55.20 and, highest value of SMA
was 61023.86.
11. ZEE.NS - RSI top 3 value which reaches the upper limit is 55,49,48.
12. SUNTV.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 67,54,52.
13. TV18BRDCST.NS - the RSI top 3 value which reaches the upper limit is 70,57,54.
14. NETWORK.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 56,55,49.
15. NDTV.NS - RSI top 3 value which reaches the upper limit is 58,50,49.
16. TVTODAY.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 56,54,49.
17. ENIL.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 86,54,53.
87
18. ZEEMEDIA.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 56,55,49.
19. RADIOCITY.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 48,48,48.
20. RAJTV.NS - RSI top 3 value which reach the upper limit is 50,49,49.
21. ZEE.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was 64.58.
22. SUNTV.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was 67.51,
23.TV18BRDCST.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
70,57,54.
24. NETWORK.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
56,55,49.
25. NDTV.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
58,50,49.
26. TVTODAY.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
56,54,49.
27. ENIL.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was 86,54,53.
28. ZEEMEDIA.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
56,55,49.
29. RADIOCITY.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
48,48,48.
30. RAJTV.NS MONEY FLOW INDEX: The highest value during the period was
50,49,49.
31. ZEE.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period
was 64.58
32.SUNTV.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period
was 67.21.
33. TV18BRDCST.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during
34. NETWORK.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the
period was 56.81
88
35. NDTV.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period
was 58.77.
36. TVTODAY.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the
period was 56.07.
37. ENIL.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period
was 86.16.
38.ZEEMEDIA.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the
period was 76.92.
39. RADIOCITY.NS - The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the
period was 48.49 and the lowest value during the period was 46.33.
40. RAJTV.NS- The highest value of the MOVING AVE DEVIATION during the period
was and the lowest value during the period was -29.22.
SUGGESTIONS
Technological advancements: The rise of internet-based streaming services and digital
platforms has impacted the demand for traditional satellite TV, leading to slower growth in
the industry.
2. Content piracy: The prevalence of unauthorized streaming and illegal downloading of TV

shows and movies has affected the profitability of satellite TV companies, as viewers have
alternative ways to access content without paying for traditional satellite subscriptions.
3. Regulatory challenges: Changes in government regulations and policies related to

broadcasting and licensing can have a significant impact on the satellite TV industry,
affecting growth prospects and investor confidence.
4. Advertising revenue: With the emergence of digital advertising platforms, advertisers

have more options to reach their target audience, diverting advertising budgets away from
89
traditional satellite TV channels. This can impact the revenue and growth potential of
satellite TV stocks.
5. Evolving viewer preferences: The preferences of viewers are shifting towards on-demand
and personalized content, which can be accessed through streaming services. This change
in consumer behavior has led to a decline in the demand for traditional satellite TV services.
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that the non-growth of satellite TV stocks in the Indian stock
market is influenced by changing consumer preferences, competition from streaming
platforms, technological advancements, content piracy, regulatory challenges, and evolving
viewer preferences. These factors have collectively impacted the profitability and growth
potential of satellite TV companies. It's important to further analyze and explore these
factors to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
➢ Agmon. T (1972), "The relations among Equity IVIarkets: A Study of Sliare Price Comovements in
the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Japan", Journal of Finance, Vol.27 (4), pp. 839-855.
➢ Ahmad, Ashraf and Ahmed (2005), "Is the Indian stock market integrated with the US and Japanese
stock markets? An empirical analysis'" South Asia economic journal, 193-206.
➢ Akgiray, V (1989), "Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and
Forecast," Journal of Business, 62(1), 55-80.
➢ Allen D. E and Rachim U. S (1996), "Dividend policy and stock price volatility: Australian
Experience", Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 6, No.2, pp.175-188.
➢ Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H(1987),"Trading Mechanism and Stock Market Returns:An Empirical
Investigation, The Journal of Finance,533-55.
➢ Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H(1991),"Volatility, Efficiency and Trading :Evidence from Japanese
Stock Market, The Journal of Finance,1765-1789.
➢ Andersen, T G and Bollerslev, T (1998), "Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do
Provide Accurate Forecasts, " International Economic Review, 39(4), 885- 905.
90
➢ Baillie, R T and Bollerslev, T (1991), "Intra-day and Inter-market Volatility in Foreign Exchange
Rates," Review of Economic Studies, 58(3), 567-585. Bakaert, Harvey (1995), "Time varying world market
integration. Journal of finance, 50(2), 403-444.
➢ Bailie, R T and DeGennaro, R P (1990), "Stock Returns and Volatility," Journal of Financial and
Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 203-214.
➢ Basher, Hassan and Islam (2007), "Time-varying volatility and equity returns in Bangladesh stock
market", Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 17, pp. 1393-1407. Beckers, S (1983), "Variances of Security Price
Returns Based on high. Low and Closing Prices", Journal of Busiess, Vol.56, No. 1, pp. 97-112.
➢ Bera, A., and M. Higgins, (1993), "ARCH Models: Properities, Estimation and Testing," Journal of
Economic Surveys, 305-362. 201
➢ Bhattacharya and Samanta (2001), "A tale of two indices: the story of the NASDAQ and The Sensex",
Journal of Quantitative Economics, Vol.1(1), pp. 89-102.
➢ Bhole L. M., (2005), Financial Institutions and Markets-structure, growth and innovations, Tata
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.
➢ Biswal and Kamaiah (2001), "Stock Market Development in India: Is There Any Trend Break?",
Institute for Social and Economic Change, Working Paper no. 62. Black (1986), "Noise", The Journal of Finance,
no. 41, 529-44.
➢ Black, F(1976), "Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes," Proceedings of 1976 Meetings of the
American Statistical Association, Business and Economics Statistics Section, Washington, DC, American Statistical
Association, 177-181.
➢ Bollersflev T., Chou R.Y., and Kroner K.F., (1992), "ARCH modeling in finance: A review of the
theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59.
➢ Bollerslev, Engle and Wooldridge (1988), "A capital asset pricing model with timevarying
covariances". Journal of political economy, 96,116-131.
➢ Bollerslev, T.(1986), "Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity", Journal of
Econometrics,. 307-327.
➢ Box, G E P and Jenkins, G M (1976), Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, revised edition,
California: Hotden-Day.
91
QUESTIONNAIRE
Type ur project title A Study on Performance Of Financial Conglomerates In NSE
and company MUTHOOT FINANCE
Please put a (√) in the appropriate bubbles/boxes except rank and descriptive questions.
1.PERSONAL PROFILE
1. Name (optional):
2. Gender: Male Female
3. Marital Status: Unmarried Married
4. Age: Below 20 21-40 41-60 60& Above
5. Locality: Rural Semi-urban Urban
6. Education: X standard and Below Intermediate
Diploma/Technical Graduation
Post- Graduation Others (Specify)
7. Occupation: Employee of Government Employee of Private
Professionals and Business Cultivation/Agriculture
92
House-wife Others (Specify)
8. Monthly Income (Rs.): Below 15,000 15,000-35,000
35,000-45,000 45,000-55,000 55,000 and above
2.INVESTOR’S INSIGHT ON
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
9. How much you save? (% of annual income)
Below 5% 05%-10% 10%-15% 15%-20% 20%&Above
10. Objectives of Your Savings? (Rank at least any five in the order of preference put 1 for
most important, 2 for important .. and so on.)
Accumulation of funds House development

Purchasing of assets Tax savings
Education of kids Marriage of youngsters
Meeting contingencies Procurement for retirement life
11. What is your current preference of saving avenues? (Rank at least any eight according
toThe order of preference, give 1 for most preferred, 2 for next preference and so
on)
S. No. Saving avenues Rank

A Bank Deposits
B Life insurance
C Chits
D Mutual Funds
E Gold and Stones
F Shares
G Postal Deposits
H Real Estate
I Bonds and Debentures
J Pension and PF
K Small Savings
L Company Deposits
M Arts Fund
12. Sources of influence of investment decisions?
Own particular venture choice Guidance from family members
Financial specialists Companions and relatives

93
13. Your Risk Tolerance?
High Moderate Low
14. Indicate your rating towards the following statement about your risk
perception. 5=Strongly Agree, 4=Agree, 3=Neutral, 2=Disagree,
1=Strongly Disagree
S.No. Risk perception 5 4 3 2 1

a A differentiated portfolio diminishes Hazard (Risk)
b The higher a speculations' yield or rate of return, the more
prominent is its related risk
c The more commonplace a speculation, the less dangerous it
is
My methodology is to be wary and maintain a strategic
d distance from all unsafe speculation
The need to exchange rapidly restricts me from considering
e more unsafe items
f The more cash one has, the more speculation hazard one can.
take
g My agent chooses the best speculation level for me
An investment that includes a lot of hazards isn't generally
H ventures, its gaming
I The more established individuals take lesser investment risk
3. INVESTOR’S PREFERENCES AND PERCEPTION TOWARDS MUTUAL FUNDS
15. How much you invest in Mutual Funds (% to total investment)
Put a (√) in the appropriate bubbles/boxes.
Below 25% 25% - 50 % 50% - 75% 75% - 100%
16. What is your source of information regarding MFs? (Rank at least any three according to the order
ofpreference, give 1 for most preferred, 2 for next preference ...and so on)
Friends and Relatives Agents and Brokers
Print Media Broadcast Media
Outdoor Media Electronic Media
94
17. Do you feel your mutual fund advisor/agent is knowledgeable?
Yes No
18. Which of the following Periodical savings plan do you adopt?
Systematic Investment Plans (SIP)
Protuberance entirety (Lump sum)
Systematic Investment Plans and protuberance entirety (SPI & Lump sum)
19. How long do you preferred to invest in Mutual Funds?
Less than 3 years 3 – 5 years 5 – 10 years
10 – 15 years 15 years and above
20. Objective of investing in MFs? (Rank at least any three according to the order of preference, 1 for
mostimportant, 2 for next and so on).
Preservation of principal
Current income
Growth and income
Conservative Growth
Aggressive Growth
Tax benefits
21. What would be your importance while selecting Asset Management Company?
5=Highly Important, 4= important, 3 =Somewhat Important, 2=Not Very Important, 1 =Not at all
Import ant
95
No. Type 5 4 3 2 1
A UTI
B LIC
C Bank sponsored joint ventures
D Private Sector
22. Which form of MF you prefer? (Rank according to the order of preference 1 for most important and 2
fornext and so on)
Closed Ended Fund Open Ended Funds Interval Fund
23. On the basis of investment objective, indicate your preference for the following schemes? (Rank at
leastany five according to the order of preference, 1 for most important, 2 for next and so on).
Mutual Fund Schemes Rank

Equity Schemes
Income Schemes
Balanced Schemes
Liquid or Money market Scheme
ELSSS-Equity
Gold ETF
Other ETFs
Gilt Schemes
Fund of Funds
Overseas Fund
24. While you are investing in MFs, what would be your preference for the following
characteristics(Influence of Attributes) of mutual funds?
5 =Most Preferred, 4 =Preferred, 3= Some What Preferred, 2 =Not Preferred, 1=Not at all
Preferred
96
S.No. Characteristics (influence 5 4 3 2 1
Attributes) of Mutual Funds
A Safety
B Liquidity
C Capital admiration
D Professional Management
E Flexibility
F Regular Income
G Diversification Benefits
H Tax reimbursement
25. Are you willing you to invest in mutual funds in future?
Yes No
26. Do you think that mutual fund investment is good investment vehicle for small investors to participate
incapital market?
Yes No
27. Are you satisfied with your present holdings?
Yes No
28. Will you recommend mutual fund investment to your friends and relatives?
Yes No
29. If the return from your mutual fund investment is less than you expected, what will you do?
Prompt withdrawal Hold up for few
days Purchase other mutual fund schemes Wait for few
months.
97
30. While you are investing in MFs, what would be your preference for the following
characteristics(Influence of Attributes) of mutual funds?
5 =Most Preferred, 4 =Preferred, 3= Some What Preferred, 2 =Not Preferred, 1=Not at all
Preferred
S.No. Characteristics (influence 5 4 3 2 1

Attributes) of Mutual Funds
A Safety
B Liquidity
C Capital admiration
D Professional Management
E Flexibility
F Regular Income
G Diversification Benefits
H Tax reimbursement
31. Are you willing you to invest in mutual funds in future?
Yes No
32. Do you think that mutual fund investment is good investment vehicle for small investors to participate
incapital market?
Yes No
98
99

Kamalesh Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kamalesh Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER -I

• The market discounts everything.

1.3 COMPANY PROFILE

ADDERS :11/2, VISHNU NAGAR, MUDICHUR ROAD, WEST TAMBARAM,

INDUSTRY : FINANCIAL SERVICES

Tripathy, Trilochan. Gil-Alana, Luis A. (2015)

Balasubramanian, Bala N and Ramaswamy, Anand. (2014)

Rudra P. Pradhan; Flávio De São Pedro Filho; John H. Hall (2014)

Chauhan, Daksha Pratapsinh. Dec (2013)

Bala, Anju. (2013)

Venkateswara K.S. Kumar & Prof. Devi V. Rama Devi (2013)

Mishra, Ankita. Mishra, Vinod. Smyth, Russell. (2014)

Didier, Tatiana & Schmukler, Sergio L. (2013)

Mrunal Joshi (2013)

Growth of Gross Domestic Product,

1.7 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

1.8 SCOPE OF STUDY

2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

2.3 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

2.4 SAMPLE SIZE

2.6 TOOLS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION

2.7 TOOLS USED FOR DATA ANALYSIS

Simple Moving Average:

SMA = (Sum of closing price for N periods) / N

Formula for RSI

RS=Average gain per day/Average loss per day.

MONEY FLOW INDEX

➢ Money Flow Index=100−100\1+Money Flow Ratio

➢ Typical Price=High + Low + Close/3

Formula for MAD,

Gender of the respondent

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Total 101 100.0 100.0

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

How much you save

Valid Most 69 68.3 68.3 68.3

Valid Most 75 74.2 74.2 74.2

Valid Most 67 66.3 66.3 66.3

Valid Most 58 57.4 57.4 57.4

Procurement for retirement life

Valid Most 58 57.4 57.4 57.4

Valid Most 48 47.7 47.7 47.7

Gold and stone

Bonds and debentures

Important 50 49.6 49.6 100.0

Total 101 100.0 100.0

Total 101 100.0 100.0

Important 22 21.8 21.8 100.0

Total 101 100.0 100.0

Valid Most 52 51.5 51.5 51.5

Important 49 48.5 48.5 100.0

Total 101 100.0 100.0

Source of influence of investment decisions

Valid High 35 34.6 34.6 34.6

A. differentiated portfolio diminishes hazard (risk).

Valid Strongly 5.0

Valid strongly 5.0

C. The more commonplace a speculation, the less dangerous it’s

Valid strongly 23.7

Valid strongly 13.8

E. The need to exchange rapidly restricts me from considering more

Valid strongly 19.8

G. My agent chooses the best speculation level for me.

Valid strongly 27.7