You are on page 1of 2

Structure Comparison : Laravel vs Codeigniter

Laravel and CodeIgniter both use an MVC framework in their architecture. But both have
di erent ways of using the same structure.

Codeigniter

CodeIgniter is made to provide top performance in a tidy environment in a shorter amount of


time. Thus, each phase of the development process is intended for optimal usability.

Interestingly, model and view are optional in CodeIgniter. Only the controller is mandatory.
Hence, CodeIgniter is not particularly strict about MVC, thanks to its object-oriented
programming (OOP) basement.

Therefore, you don’t have to rely solely on MVC structure when using CodeIgniter. It gives you
more freedom and flexibility in development.

MVC in CodeIgniter separates data, presentation, and logic, and it o ers built-in components to
manage emails, databases, and sessions. What’s more, these built-in features work
independently of other parts, so it’s easy to maintain and upgrade.
Laravel

As another PHP framework, Laravel is also based on the MVC architecture. But unlike
CongeIgniter, Laravel strictly follows the MVC architecture. As a result, Larvel can proficiently
maintain the MVC structure from filing to internal operations.

It’s pretty simple to initiate. First, you must create a model that generates a database table.
Then, interact with that model using a controller file to display the results in a view file.

However, if you are unfamiliar with the MVC architecture, using the Laravel framework could be
di icult because it doesn’t allow you to ignore the structure.

You might also like