You are on page 1of 11

CASE LAW:

POSTING OF
WORKERS

LIUBOV MARTYNYSHYN
EARLY LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

THE CONCEPT OF 'POSTING THIS DIRECTIVE ESTABLISHED


WORKERS' ORIGINATES FROM FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES FOR
THE EU'S 1996 POSTED EQUAL WORKING CONDITIONS
WORKERS DIRECTIVE, AIMED AND EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS FOR
AT PROTECTING WORKERS POSTED WORKERS.
SENT TEMPORARILY TO
ANOTHER COUNTRY.
EARLY LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

PARALLEL TO THE EU'S EFFORTS, THE THE ILO'S CONVENTIONS, FOCUSING


INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ON WAGES, WORKING HOURS, AND
ORGANIZATION (ILO) PLAYED A KEY SAFETY, HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY SHAPED
ROLE IN SETTING GLOBAL LABOR NATIONAL POLICIES REGARDING
STANDARDS. POSTED WORKERS.
SUMMARY: THIS CASE INVOLVED A
BELGIAN COMPANY POSTING
MOROCCAN WORKERS TO GERMANY.
THE KEY ISSUE WAS WHETHER NON-EU
WORKERS, LEGALLY EMPLOYED BY A

KEY EUROPEAN COMPANY IN AN EU MEMBER STATE,


COULD BE POSTED TO ANOTHER
MEMBER STATE WITHOUT OBTAINING

COURT OF ADDITIONAL WORK PERMITS.

JUSTICE CASES
JUDGMENT: THE ECJ RULED THAT SUCH
WORKERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO
PROVIDE SERVICES IN ANOTHER
MEMBER STATE WITHOUT ADDITIONAL
WORK PERMITS, PROVIDED THEY ARE
VANDER ELST CASE (C-43/93)
LEGALLY EMPLOYED IN THE HOME
MEMBER STATE. THIS CASE WAS
CRUCIAL IN SETTING A PRECEDENT FOR
THE RIGHTS OF NON-EU WORKERS
WITHIN THE EU.
LAVAL UN PARTNERI LTD V SVENSKA
BYGGNADSARBETAREFÖRBUNDET (C-
341/05)

SUMMARY: THIS CASE INVOLVED A LATVIAN JUDGMENT: THE ECJ HELD THAT WHILE THE
COMPANY POSTING WORKERS TO SWEDEN POSTED WORKERS DIRECTIVE ALLOWS
AND HIGHLIGHTED THE CONFLICT COMPANIES TO POST WORKERS TO OTHER EU
BETWEEN THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE STATES, THE HOST STATE CAN IMPOSE ITS
SERVICES AND THE PROTECTION OF OWN MINIMUM WAGE AND WORKING
WORKERS' RIGHTS. CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, SUCH MEASURES
MUST BE PROPORTIONATE AND CANNOT
RESTRICT THE FREE PROVISION OF SERVICES.
COMMISSION V LUXEMBOURG (C-319/06)

SUMMARY: THIS CASE DEALT WITH THE JUDGMENT: THE ECJ FOUND THAT
COMPATIBILITY OF LUXEMBOURG'S LAWS LUXEMBOURG HAD FAILED TO COMPLY WITH
WITH THE EU'S POSTED WORKERS THE POSTED WORKERS DIRECTIVE BY
IMPOSING CONDITIONS THAT WERE MORE
DIRECTIVE, PARTICULARLY CONCERNING
RESTRICTIVE THAN NECESSARY, THUS
THE CONDITIONS LUXEMBOURG IMPOSED
HINDERING THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE
ON FOREIGN SERVICE PROVIDERS. SERVICES.
POSTING OF THIS DIRECTIVE WAS ESTABLISHED TO

WORKERS IN THE
REMOVE BARRIERS TO TRADE IN
SERVICES WITHIN THE EU, SIMPLIFYING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR

FRAMEWORK OF THE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ENHANCING


CONSUMER RIGHTS. IT SPECIFICALLY

PROVISION OF TARGETS THE PROVISION OF SERVICES


ACROSS EU MEMBER STATES,
ENSURING LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR THE
SERVICES DIRECTIVE EXERCISE OF FUNDAMENTAL
FREEDOMS UNDER THE TREATY. I

(2006/123/EC)
NATIONAL COURTS AND WORKER POSTING

1 RESOLVING CONFLICTS BETWEEN 4 ENFORCEMENT OF WORKER RIGHTS AND


NATIONAL AND EU LAWS PROTECTIONS

2 IMPLEMENTATION OF EU DIRECTIVES AT 5 ADDRESSING ISSUES OF SOCIAL


THE NATIONAL LEVEL DUMPING AND EXPLOITATION

3 INTERPRETATION OF ‘POSTED WORKER’ STATUS


CONTEMPORARY LEGAL
CHALLENGES
MODERN WORK ENVIRONMENT: RAPID EVOLUTION WITH THE RISE OF THE GIG
ECONOMY AND REMOTE WORK.
CHALLENGES TO LEGAL FRAMEWORKS: ADAPTATION NEEDED IN EMPLOYMENT
DEFINITIONS, WORKERS' RIGHTS, AND CROSS-BORDER REGULATIONS.
FOCUS ON FAIR TREATMENT: ENSURING EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR POSTED
WORKERS, PARTICULARLY IN WAGES AND WORKING CONDITIONS.
REFLECTING SOCIO-ECONOMIC SHIFTS: THESE CHANGES HIGHLIGHT BROADER
SHIFTS IN LABOR MARKETS, THE NATURE OF DIGITAL-AGE WORK, AND GLOBAL
EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITIES.
Conclusion
IN OUR TALK, WE EXPLORED THE COMPLEX RULES FOR
SENDING WORKERS TO DIFFERENT COUNTRIES AND HOW
THESE HAVE CHANGED WITH NEW WORK STYLES LIKE
REMOTE JOBS. IT'S A BALANCING ACT: PROTECTING
WORKERS' RIGHTS WHILE SUPPORTING BUSINESS GROWTH.
THE KEY TAKEAWAY IS THE IMPORTANCE OF STAYING
ADAPTABLE IN THE RAPIDLY EVOLVING GLOBAL JOB MARKET.
Thank you for your
attention!

You might also like