Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title Page
Title Page
POSTING OF
WORKERS
LIUBOV MARTYNYSHYN
EARLY LEGAL FOUNDATIONS
JUSTICE CASES
JUDGMENT: THE ECJ RULED THAT SUCH
WORKERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO
PROVIDE SERVICES IN ANOTHER
MEMBER STATE WITHOUT ADDITIONAL
WORK PERMITS, PROVIDED THEY ARE
VANDER ELST CASE (C-43/93)
LEGALLY EMPLOYED IN THE HOME
MEMBER STATE. THIS CASE WAS
CRUCIAL IN SETTING A PRECEDENT FOR
THE RIGHTS OF NON-EU WORKERS
WITHIN THE EU.
LAVAL UN PARTNERI LTD V SVENSKA
BYGGNADSARBETAREFÖRBUNDET (C-
341/05)
SUMMARY: THIS CASE INVOLVED A LATVIAN JUDGMENT: THE ECJ HELD THAT WHILE THE
COMPANY POSTING WORKERS TO SWEDEN POSTED WORKERS DIRECTIVE ALLOWS
AND HIGHLIGHTED THE CONFLICT COMPANIES TO POST WORKERS TO OTHER EU
BETWEEN THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE STATES, THE HOST STATE CAN IMPOSE ITS
SERVICES AND THE PROTECTION OF OWN MINIMUM WAGE AND WORKING
WORKERS' RIGHTS. CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, SUCH MEASURES
MUST BE PROPORTIONATE AND CANNOT
RESTRICT THE FREE PROVISION OF SERVICES.
COMMISSION V LUXEMBOURG (C-319/06)
SUMMARY: THIS CASE DEALT WITH THE JUDGMENT: THE ECJ FOUND THAT
COMPATIBILITY OF LUXEMBOURG'S LAWS LUXEMBOURG HAD FAILED TO COMPLY WITH
WITH THE EU'S POSTED WORKERS THE POSTED WORKERS DIRECTIVE BY
IMPOSING CONDITIONS THAT WERE MORE
DIRECTIVE, PARTICULARLY CONCERNING
RESTRICTIVE THAN NECESSARY, THUS
THE CONDITIONS LUXEMBOURG IMPOSED
HINDERING THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE
ON FOREIGN SERVICE PROVIDERS. SERVICES.
POSTING OF THIS DIRECTIVE WAS ESTABLISHED TO
WORKERS IN THE
REMOVE BARRIERS TO TRADE IN
SERVICES WITHIN THE EU, SIMPLIFYING
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR
(2006/123/EC)
NATIONAL COURTS AND WORKER POSTING