Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. Question: What are the main differences between credit analysis and equity
analysis? How do these impact the financial statement information that is
important for each type of analysis?
5. None
6. None
Balance Sheet. The accounting equation is the basis of the balance sheet:
Assets = Liabilities + Equity.
The left-hand side of this equation relates to the economic resources
controlled by the firm, called assets. These resources are valuable in the
sense that they represent potential sources of future revenues. The company
uses these resources to carry out its operating activities. In order to engage in
its operating activities, the company must obtain funds to fund its investing
activities. The right-hand side of the accounting equation details the sources
of these funds. Liabilities represent funds obtained from creditors. These
amounts represent obligations or, alternatively, the claims of creditors on
assets. Equity, also referred to as shareholders' equity, encompasses two
different financing sources: (1) funds invested or contributed by owners,
called "contributed capital", and (2) accumulated earnings since inception
and in excess of distributions to owners (dividends), called "retained
earnings". From the owners' viewpoint, these amounts represent their claim
on assets. It often is helpful for students to rewrite the accounting equation in
terms of the underlying business activities:
Investing Activities = Financing Activities.
Recognizing the two basic sources of financing, this can be rewritten as:
Investments = Creditor Financing + Owner Financing.
Statement of Cash Flows. Under the accrual basis of accounting, net income
equals net cash flow only over the life of the firm. For periodic reporting
purposes, accrual performance numbers nearly always differ from cash flow
numbers. This creates a demand for periodic reporting on both income and
cash flows. The statement of cash flows details the cash inflows and
outflows related to a company's operating, investing, and financing activities
over a period of time.
On the other hand, one must recognize that accounting is a social science
subject to human decision making. Moreover, it is a continually evolving
discipline subject to revisions and improvements, based on experience and
emerging business transactions. These limitations sometimes frustrate certain
users of financial statements such that they look for substitute data.
However, there is no equivalent substitute. Double-entry accounting is the
only reliable system for the systematic recording, classification, and
summarization of most business transactions and events. Improvement lies in
the refinement of this time-tested system rather than in substitution.
Accordingly, any serious analyst of a company’s financial position and
results of operations, learns the accounting framework and its terminology,
conventions, as well as its imperfections in financial analysis.
Explanatory Notes. Notes are an integral part of financial statements and are
intended to communicate additional information regarding items included in,
and excluded from, the statements.
16.None
17.None
18.None
19.None
20.None
21.None
22.None
23.None
24.Question: What is a necessary condition for usefulness of a ratio of financial
numbers? Explain.
A ratio expresses a mathematical relation between two quantities. To be
meaningful (useful in analysis), a ratio of financial numbers must capture an
important economic relation. Certain items in financial statements have no
logical relation to each other and, therefore, would not be amenable to ratio
analysis.
Also, some type of benchmark or norm must exist for interpretation of the
ratio. One can draw minimal inference from being told that the return on
assets for a certain firm is .02. However, if the analyst is told that the
company’s return on assets is .02 and the industry average is .08, the ratio
becomes more useful for interpretation purposes.
Since not all relations have meaning and not all ratios are useful for all
analytical purposes, the analyst must be careful in selecting ratios that are useful
for the particular task at hand. Unfortunately, ratios are too often misunderstood
and their significance overrated. Ratios can provide an analyst with clues and
symptoms of underlying conditions. Ratios also can highlight areas that require
further investigation and inquiry. Still, ratios, like all other analysis tools,
cannot predict the future. Moreover, the usefulness of insights obtained from
ratios depends on their skillful interpretation by the analyst. Of these several
limitations on ratio analysis, two are especially problematic:
a. Current ratio; Acid-test (quick) ratio; Cash ratio; Total debt ratio; Total
debt to equity ratio; Long-term debt to equity; Financial leverage ratio;
Book value per share
b. Times interest earned; Gross margin ratio; Operating profit margin ratio;
Pretax profit margin ratio; Net profit margin ratio; Effective tax rate
Exercise 1-1—continued
To avoid the potential for misleading inferences from these factors, we must
carefully examine footnotes, explanations, and qualifications that are disclosed as
part of financial reporting. Our comparative analysis must be adjusted for such
possibilities. Also, changing price levels for the periods of analysis can distort
comparative financial statements. For example, even items on a comparative balance
sheet or income statement that pertain to a single year are not all expressed in
dollars having the same purchasing power. Namely, in an era of rising prices, a
given year's depreciation represents older dollars having greater purchasing power
compared with most other income statement items. Further, inventory methods
other than LIFO can add to the inflationary distortion of the income statement.
Similarly, balance sheet items for a given year are expressed in dollars of varying
purchasing power.
Beyond these vertical distortions that exist within individual years covered by
comparative financial statements, are horizontal distortions in the trends and
relations of corresponding items across years. For example, an upward trend in sales
may actually reflect a constant level of, or even decline in, actual sales volume
because of increases in prices. Because of the potential for misleading inferences
from comparative analysis during periods of changing price levels, its usefulness as
an analytical and interpretative tool is severely restricted. This is because price level
changes can limit the comparability of the data in financial statements across time.
Of course, analysis of price-level adjusted financial statements can restore the
comparability of these statements across time and, thereby, enhance their usefulness
as tools of analysis and interpretation.
Exercise 1-2 (25 minutes)
2006 2005
Sales................................................ 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of goods sold.......................... 66.0 52.4
Gross profit.................................... 34.0% 47.6%
Operating expenses........................ 21.0 19.4
Net income...................................... 13.0% 28.2%
a. Current ratio:
b. Acid-test ratio:
Analysis and Interpretation: Mixon's short-term liquidity position has weakened over
this two-year period. Both the current and acid-test ratios show declining trends.
Although we do not have information about the nature of the company's business, the
acid-test ratio shift from ‘1.7 to 1’ down to ‘0.9 to 1’ and the current ratio shift from
‘2.9 to 1’ down to ‘1.9 to 1’ indicate a potential liquidity problem. Still, we must
recognize that industry standards may show that the 2004 ratios were too high (instead
of 2006 ratios as too low).
Exercise 1-4 (20 minutes)
Mixon Company
Common-Size Comparative Balance Sheet
December 31, 2004-2006
2006 2005* 2004*
Cash................................................................................ 5.9% 8.0% 9.9%
Accounts receivable, net............................................... 17.1 14.0 13.2
Merchandise inventory................................................. 21.5 18.5 14.2
Prepaid expenses........................................................... 1.9 2.1 1.1
Plant assets, net ............................................................ 53.6 57.3 61.6
Total assets ................................................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
c. Inventory turnover:
Analysis and Interpretation: The number of days' sales uncollected has increased and
the accounts receivable turnover has declined. Also, the merchandise turnover has
decreased and days’ sales in inventory has increased. While none of these changes in
ratios that occurred from 2005 to 2006 appear dramatic, it seems that Mixon is
becoming less efficient in managing its inventory and in collecting its receivables.
Exercise 1-6 (25 minutes)
Analysis and Interpretation: Mixon added debt to its capital structure during 2006,
with the result that the debt ratio increased from 39.9% to 43.7%. However, the book
value of pledged assets is well above secured liabilities (2.8 to 1 in 2006 and 2.5 to 1 in
2005), and the increased profitability of the company allowed it to increase the times
interest earned from 4.2 to 4.8 times. Apparently, the company is able to handle the
increased debt. However, we should note that the debt increase is entirely in current
liabilities, which places a greater stress on short-term liquidity.
Exercise 1-7 (30 minutes)
$31,375
2005: = 7.7%
($445,000 + $372,500)/2
c. Dividend yield:
Supporting calculations: When the sums of each year's common-size cost of goods sold
and expenses are subtracted from the common-size sales percents, net income percents
are as follows:
Also notice that if 2003 sales are assumed to be $100, then sales for 2004 are $103.20 and
the sales for 2005 are $104.40. If the income percents for the years are applied to these
amounts, the net incomes are:
a. Bond price = Present value (PV) of cash flows (both interest payments and principal
repayment)
c. Risk is the possibility that Colin Company will not make all of the interest and principal payments
that are called for in the debt agreement. The higher that an investor perceives the risk of non-
payment to be, the more the investor should discount the cash flows. Thus, a higher risk of
repayment is reflected in a higher discount rate. By using the higher discount rate, the amount that
the investor is willing to pay for the bonds is lower.