Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maternal Brain in The Process
Maternal Brain in The Process
To cite this article: Faranak Gholampour, Madelon M. E. Riem & Marion I. van den Heuvel
(2020) Maternal brain in the process of maternal-infant bonding: Review of the literature, Social
Neuroscience, 15:4, 380-384, DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2020.1764093
a
Faculty of Social Sciences, Doctoral School of Sociology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary; bDepartment of Medical and Clinical
Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands; cDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The
Netherlands
Bonding is a special connection between mothers and physical nurturance, and attention to the infant (Piallini
infants, partners, family, or friends. In mother-infant bond- et al., 2015). The maternal brain network consists of
ing, a mother can recognize her infant and show an multiple brain areas, including multiple cortical regions
affectional attachment toward the infant to protect him/ and the limbic system, which act to support various
her and give warmth, comfort, and food (Broad et al., forms of maternal bonding behavior (Kohl & Dulac,
2006). According to Kennell and Klaus (1976), maternal- 2018). In the postpartum period, both hormones and
infant bonding is about a mother’s affections, emotions, interactions with the baby are connected to complex
and attitudes toward her infant. Bonding includes nurtur- structural and functional changes in the maternal brain.
ing behaviors such as holding, hugging, rocking, singing, These changes in the maternal brain may be of the
feeding, gazing, and kissing. There are other important utmost importance, since the survival of the infant
factors including face-to-face interaction, having eye con- dependents on the mother’s efforts and actions (Barba-
tact, skin-to-skin touching, smelling, and smiling, that are Müller, Craddock, Carmona & Hoekzema, 2019).
all vital to have a good and high-quality mother-infant Yet, little is known about maternal brain changes
bonding (Feldman et al., 2011; Perry, 2002). Importantly, underlying mother-infant bonding. Understanding how
the emotional bond between mother and child forms the a mother responds uniquely to her own infant, when
infants’ first model for close relationships and is strongly smiling, crying or playing, could be the first step to know
associated to the infant’s survival and cognitive develop- about the neural bases of maternal-infant bonding
ment in the future (Rossen et al., 2016). (Strathearn et al., 2008), since these facial cues from
Recent studies have suggested that maternal brain infants play an important role in drawing out maternal
alterations may help mothers to form strong bonding care and attention (Thompson-Booth et al., 2014). In the
with their infant and develop good caregiving practices, current review, we present an overview of the growing
starting in the prenatal period (Barba-Müller, Craddock, literature about the maternal brain and its neural
Carmona & Hoekzema, 2019). In all mammalian species, responses to infant stimuli (faces, cries, etc.) that may
pregnancy and parturition are related to changes in the underlie the process of forming the maternal-infant
maternal brain involved in motivation, emotional and bond.
CONTACT Marion I. van den Heuvel m.i.vdnheuvel@tilburguniversity.edu Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan
2, Tilburg 5037AB, The Netherlands
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built
upon in any way.
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE 381
Neural bases of the maternal brain photographs of their own child, friends of their child,
unfamiliar children, and unfamiliar adults was investi-
The process of becoming a mother initiates changes in
gated by using fMRI. The findings showed that viewing
maternal brain structure and function that might facil-
pictures of their own child evoked unique patterns of
itate mother-infant bonding (Dudek et al., 2020; Swain et
neural responses. Moreover, this unique response was
al., 2007). The findings of a longitudinal neuroimaging
related to the mother-child relationship. Stronger
study by Hoekzema et al. (2017) showed that human
responses and increased activation in areas associated
pregnancy leads to long-lasting alterations in maternal
with emotional responses such as the right amygdala,
brain structure. They investigated the changes in gray
the left insula, anterior paracingulate cortex, and poster-
matter across pregnancy and two years after pregnancy
ior superior temporal sulcus (STS) were found when
by using MRI. They found that pregnancy is associated
mothers viewed a picture of their own child’s face com-
with long-lasting gray matter volume reductions in the
pared with the faces of familiar children. The same acti-
maternal brain in regions affecting the anterior, poster-
vation happened in the right anterior paracingulate, the
ior, cortical midline, and specific sections of the bilateral
left insula, the left STS, and the posterior cingulate-pre-
prefrontal and temporal cortex. Furthermore, they exam-
cuneus bilaterally after viewing a picture of their own
ined the changes in gray matter volume across preg-
child’s face compared with the faces of unfamiliar chil-
nancy in relation to bonding by using the Maternal
dren. They concluded that the uniqueness of these acti-
Postnatal Attachment Scale (Condon & Corkindale,
vations show that the mother-infant relationship could
1998). The analyzes showed that the reduction of gray
vary from other types of social relationships. In a study
matter volume significantly predicted the quality of
by Barrett et al. (2012), maternal brain responses to
maternal bonding and the absence of hostility toward
infant stimuli in 22 mothers with a three-month-old
their newborns in the postpartum period. These reduc-
infant were measured by showing positive and negative
tions continued for at least two years post-pregnancy
faces of own and unfamiliar infants during fMRI scan-
and prepared women for the transition into mother-
ning. The findings showed that greater amygdala
hood. Structural and functional neural plasticity in the
response to own compared with unfamiliar positive
human brain in the early postpartum period may there-
infant faces was related to positive emotions about and
fore help the mother to accept her new role and making
strong maternal bonding to the own infant. Moreover,
a bond with her baby, especially by measuring activity in
mothers experiencing lower levels of anxiety showed a
the mothers’ brains in response to their babies’ auditory
higher amygdala response to their own infant and
or visual stimuli (Kim et al., 2016; Swain et al., 2014a).
reported more positive attitudes toward their infants.
Kim et al. (2010b) identified structural changes in
Reward is highly involved in shaping behavior and
similar brain regions in mothers as Hoekzema et al.
maternal behavior is likely one of the most strongly
(2017), during the first few postpartum months. Brain
reward-mediated behaviors among all mammals (Nephew
imaging data were obtained between 2 and 4 weeks
et al., 2015). In line with this, several studies examined
postpartum and between 3 and 4 months postpartum.
maternal brain responses to infant cues and reported
The findings showed increased gray matter volumes in
increased activation along reward system pathways
large regions of the prefrontal cortex, parietal lobe, and
(Bartels & Zeki, 2004; Kim et al., 2010a; Moses-Kolko et al.,
midbrain. They concluded that this postpartum period is
2014; Noriuchi et al., 2008; Numan & Young, 2016;
a critical time for the development of maternal bonding.
Strathearn et al., 2008; Swain et al., 2014a; Young et al.,
In addition, increased gray matter volume in the midbrain
2017). For example, Strathearn et al. (2008) showed that
was associated with positive maternal-infant bonding
when first-time mothers observe their own infant’s face, all
and mother’s emotions toward her baby. Changes in
of the key dopamine-associated reward-processing regions
these brain regions may therefore be important for pro-
of the brain are activated, including the midbrain VTA
moting healthy maternal-infant bonding.
(ventral tegmental area)/substantia nigra regions, the stria-
tum, and the prefrontal cortex, as well as the primary motor
area. They found that happy, but not neutral or sad own-
Neural response to infant cues
infant faces, significantly activated nigrostriatal brain
Previous studies showed that several parts of the mater- regions interconnected by dopaminergic neurons, includ-
nal brain are involved in response to infant’s cues, ing the substantia nigra and dorsal putamen. In another
including the brain reward system, especially in the study (Wan et al., 2014), the neural basis of maternal-infant
amygdala and the hypothalamus (Feldman, 2015; Lenzi bonding was investigated by using fMRI and videotaping
et al., 2009). In a study by Leibenluft et al. (2004), mother-infant interaction, when mothers viewed videos of
mothers’ neural activation in response to viewing their own infant compared to an unknown infant, and
382 F. GHOLAMPOUR ET AL.
Figure 1. The maternal caregiving brain network. Precuneus cortex (orange); medial frontal cortex (dark blue); anterior cingulate
cortex (pink); orbitofrontal cortex (red); caudate and nucleus accumbens (light blue), amygdala (green); insula (yellow). Regions
derived using the Harvard-Oxford (sub)cortical atlas.
whether such unique neural responses were associated patterns during maternal-infant bonding in human
with behavioral and self-reported measures of mother- mothers. Importantly, animal studies have reported
infant relations. The findings showed that greater own- changes in structural and functional brain circuitry (for
infant response in the middle frontal gyrus was associated a review, see Pereira, 2016), while functional and struc-
with higher quality of mother-infant play interactions, while tural connectivity research in human pregnancy and
greater sensory and visual area activations, and to a lesser postnatal period is still lacking. Since the brain largely
extent, insula activations, were associated with greater per- operates by its connections between brain areas, it will
ceived maternal warmth toward her infant. be an important future direction to investigate altera-
Several brain areas have been reported to be specifi- tions in brain networks in response to pregnancy and
cally related to maternal behaviors and emotions toward motherhood. Moreover, the use of novel brain imaging
her infant, such as the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), techniques, such as hyperscanning (i.e., scanning of
anterior insula, the periaqueductal gray (PAG), and the mother and infant simultaneously with EEG or fNIRS;
striatum (for a review, see Kikuchi & Noriuchi, 2015). see for a review Wass et al., 2020; Babiloni and Astolfi,
According to Swain et al. (2014a), hypothalamic-mid- 2014), can provide new insights into the mother-infant
brain-limbic-paralimbic-cortical circuits act in concert to bond by computing “neural synchrony” between
support maternal responses to their infants. Some mother and infant.
researchers (e.g., Parsons et al., 2013) underscore the Another issue that needs further attention in future
critical role of OFC in the parent-infant relationship. research is the variability of the measures used to assess
The theory is that both infant’s visual and vocal cues mother-infant bonding across studies. While some stu-
evoke OFC activity in parents, which is vital for orienting dies used experimental approaches such as EEG and
of their attention to infant’s needs, making a strong fNIRS during the mother-infant interaction, other studies
bond between them, and facilitate parenting by have used scanning mothers while they are observing
responding to infant’s stimuli. Together, these studies own and standard infant-related photos. Researchers
demonstrate that several parts of the maternal brain, should also continue to experiment with dynamic sti-
mostly related to the reward system, are activated in muli, such as videos of babies (Swain et al., 2013).
response to infant’s cues during maternal-infant bond- In addition, because of the little knowledge about the
ing in the postpartum period. See Figure 1 for an over- structural plasticity and changes in the maternal brain
view of brain areas implicated in maternal-infant during pregnancy and the postpartum period, it is not
bonding and interaction. clear whether healthy bonding activates the neural bases
in the maternal brain or changes in maternal brain lead to
a positive or negative relationship between the mother
Future directions and her infant. In other words, the direction of the effect
Decades of research studies have provided detailed and its causality is not clear yet. For that reason, more
knowledge about the maternal brain in animals. Yet, research using longitudinal designs is required to expand
comparable studies in humans are still sparse. our knowledge in the field of maternal bonding and the
Therefore, further longitudinal fMRI studies of human maternal brain in the pre- and postpartum period. Some
mothers are needed to confirm findings from animal researchers (e.g., Wan et al., 2014) suggested using pro-
studies and to better understand maternal brain cedures that activate the mother and infants’ attachment
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE 383
Kennell, J. H., & Klaus, M. H. (1976). Maternal-infant bonding. Perry, B. D. (2002). Bonding and attachment in maltreated chil-
The C.V.Mosby Company. dren: Consequences of emotional neglect in childhood.
Kikuchi, Y., & Noriuchi, M. (2015). The neuroscience of maternal Houston, TX: Child Trauma Academy Press.
love. Neuroscience Communications, 1–6. https://doi.org/10. Piallini, G., De Palo, F., & Simonelli, A. (2015). Parental brain:
14800/nc.991 Cerebral areas activated by infant cries and faces. A compar-
Kim, P., Leckman, J. F., Mayes, L. C., Newman, M. A., Feldman, R., ison between different populations of parents and not.
& Swain, J. E. (2010a). Perceived quality of maternal care in Frontiers in Psychology, 21(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/
childhood and structure and function of mothers’ brain. fpsyg.2015.01625
Developmental Science, 13(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10. Rossen, L., Hutchinson, D., Wilson, J., Burns, L., Olsson, C. A.,
1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00923.x Allsop, S., Elliott, E. J., Jacobs, S., Macdonald, J. A., & Mattick,
Kim, P., Mayes, L. C., Wang, X., Leckman, J. F., Feldman, R., & R. P. (2016). Predictors of postnatal mother-infant bonding:
Swain, J. E. (2010b). The plasticity of human maternal brain: The role of antenatal bonding, maternal substance use and
Longitudinal changes in brain anatomy during the early mental health. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 19(4),
postpartum period. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124(5), 695– 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0602-z
700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020884 Strathearn, L., Li, J., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). What’s
Kim, P., Strathearn, L., & Swain, J. E. (2016). The maternal brain in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues.
and its plasticity in humans. Hormones and Behavior, 77(2016), Pediatrics, 122(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-
113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.08.001 1566
Kohl, J., & Dulac, C. (2018). Neural control of parental behaviors. Swain, J. E., Dayton, C. J., Kim, P., Tolman, R. M., & Volling, B. L.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 49, 116–122. https://doi. (2014a). Progress on the paternal brain: Theory, animal
org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.002 models, human brain research, and mental health implica-
Leibenluft, E., Gobbini, M. I., Harrison, T., & Haxby, J. V. (2004). tions. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35(5), 394–408. https://
Mothers’ neural activation in response to pictures of their doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21471
children and other children. Biological Psychiatry, 56(4), 225– Swain, J. E., Kim, P., Spicer, J., Ho, S. S., Dayton, C. J., Elmadih,
232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.05.017 A., & Abel, K. M. (2014b). Approaching the biology of
Lenzi, D., Trentini, C., Pantano, P., Macaluso, E., Iacoboni, M., human parental attachment: Brain imaging, oxytocin and
Lenzi, G. L., & Ammaniti, M. (2009). Neural basis of maternal coordinated assessments of mothers and fathers. Brain
communication and emotional expression processing dur- Research, 1580, 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.
ing infant preverbal stage. Cerebral Cortex, 19(5), 1124–1133. 2014.03.007
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn153 Swain, J. E., Konrath, S., Dayton, K. J., Finegood, E. D., & Ho, S. S.
Moses-Kolko, E. L., Horner, M. S., Phillips, M. L., Hipwell, A. E., & (2013). Toward a neuroscience of interactive parent-infant
Swain, J. E. (2014). In search of neural endophenotypes of dyad empathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 438–439.
postpartum psychopathology and disrupted maternal care- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002063
giving. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 26(10), 665–684. Swain, J. E., Lorberbaum, J. P., Kose, K., & Strathearn, L. (2007).
https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12183 Brain basis of early parent-infant interactions: Psychology,
Nephew, B. C., Murgatroyd, C., Pittet, F., & Febo, M. (2015). Brain physiology, and in vivo functional neuroimaging studies.
reward pathway dysfunction in maternal depression and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3–4), 262–
addiction: A present and future transgenerational risk. 287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01731.x
Journal of Reward Deficiency Syndrome, 1(3), 105–116. Thompson-Booth, C., Viding, E., Mayes, L. C., Rutherford, H. J. V.,
https://doi.org/10.17756/jrds.2015-017 Hodsoll, S., & McCrory, E. J. (2014). Here’s looking at you, kid:
Noriuchi, M., Kikuchi, Y., & Senoo, A. (2008). The functional Attention to infant emotional faces in mothers and non-
neuroanatomy of maternal love: Mother’s response to mothers. Developmental Science, 17(1), 35–46. https://doi.
Infant’s attachment behaviors. Biological Psychiatry, 63(4), org/10.1111/desc.12090
415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.018 Wan, M. W., Downey, D., Strachan, H., Elliott, R., Williams, S. R., &
Numan, M., & Young, L. J. (2016). Neural mechanisms of Abel, K. M. (2014). The neural basis of maternal bonding.
mother-infant bonding and pair bonding: Similarities, differ- PloS One, 9(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
ences, and broader implications. Hormones and Behavior, 77, 0088436
98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.015 Wass, S. V., Whitehorn, M., Marriott Haresign, I., Phillips, E., &
Parsons, C. E., Stark, E. A., Young, K. S., Stein, A., & Kringelbach, M. L. Leong, V. (2020). Interpersonal neural entrainment during
(2013). Understanding the human parental brain: A critical role early social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4),
of the orbitofrontal cortex. Social Neuroscience, 8(6), 525–543. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.842610 Young, K. S., Parsons, C. E., Stein, A., Vuust, P., Craske, M. G., &
Pereira, M. (2016). Structural and functional plasticity in the Kringelbach, M. L. (2017). The neural basis of responsive
maternal brain circuitry. New Directions for Child and caregiving behaviour: Investigating temporal dynamics
Adolescent Development, (2016(153), 23–46. https://doi.org/ within the parental brain. Behavioural Brain Research, 325,
10.1002/cad.20163 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.012