The appellants appealed the rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a case related to cheating and forgery. The complainant, who belongs to a Scheduled Tribe, had entered into an agreement in 2010 to sell land to appellant 1 but later rescinded the agreement via a public notice. In 2016, appellant 1 sold the land to appellant 2. The complainant alleged that appellants took advantage of his illiteracy to grab his land through bogus documents. The court dismissed the appeal, noting that while both appellants may belong to Scheduled Tribes, the offenses were serious in nature and no case was made for anticipatory bail.
The appellants appealed the rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a case related to cheating and forgery. The complainant, who belongs to a Scheduled Tribe, had entered into an agreement in 2010 to sell land to appellant 1 but later rescinded the agreement via a public notice. In 2016, appellant 1 sold the land to appellant 2. The complainant alleged that appellants took advantage of his illiteracy to grab his land through bogus documents. The court dismissed the appeal, noting that while both appellants may belong to Scheduled Tribes, the offenses were serious in nature and no case was made for anticipatory bail.
The appellants appealed the rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a case related to cheating and forgery. The complainant, who belongs to a Scheduled Tribe, had entered into an agreement in 2010 to sell land to appellant 1 but later rescinded the agreement via a public notice. In 2016, appellant 1 sold the land to appellant 2. The complainant alleged that appellants took advantage of his illiteracy to grab his land through bogus documents. The court dismissed the appeal, noting that while both appellants may belong to Scheduled Tribes, the offenses were serious in nature and no case was made for anticipatory bail.