Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the past, carbohydrates have been classified as either available carbohydrates, and changes in blood glucose and
simple or complex based on the number of simple sugars insulin are measured every 2 hours. The GI is calculated
per molecule. Simple carbohydrates can be categorized as as the area under the curve of the test food divided by the
a single sugar (monosaccharides), which include glucose, area under the curve of the control food, then multiplied
fructose, and galactose, or double sugars (disaccharides), by 100 to represent a percentage of the control food.3 For
which include sucrose, lactose, and maltose. Complex car- example, a baked potato has a GI of 94 relative to glu-
bohydrates, also known as polysaccharides, are starches cose, which means that the blood glucose response to the
formed by longer saccharide chains, which means they take carbohydrate in a baked potato is 94% of the blood glu-
longer to break down. It has been assumed that starchy cose response to the same amount of carbohydrate in pure
foods cause smaller increases in blood glucose than simple glucose. In contrast, sweet potato, which is also a com-
sugars. However, this system is too simplistic and is not plex carbohydrate, has a GI of 44 relative to glucose and
predictable because the changes in blood glucose and insu- induces a much lower blood glucose response in compari-
lin levels after consuming complex carbohydrates can be son with pure glucose.2 Therefore, you can say that not
very different.1 For example, complex carbohydrates refer all carbohydrates or calories are created equal (Fig. 87.2).
to any starches, including the highly refined starches found
in white bread, pastries, and cakes, which induce a very
different blood glucose and insulin response than whole High-GI foods can stimulate the reward and food craving
grains and starchy vegetables, such as sweet potatoes. As areas of the brain seen with other addictions. The rebound
a result, a concept known as the glycemic index (GI) was hypoglycemia (Fig. 87.3) can exacerbate cravings for high-
introduced in the early 1980s. It has become a very useful GI foods, which leads to a vicious cycle that can increase
insulin, inflammation, and triglyceride levels.4
nutritional concept that allows new insight into the rela-
tionship between carbohydrate-rich foods and health.2
863
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
864 PART III Tools for Your Practice
Spikes in insulin and blood sugar trigger production of triglycerides from the
liver to help store excess sugar.
Troughs of hypoglycemia is also associated with negative health outcomes.
FIG. 87.3 □ Blood sugar and insulin levels.
TABLE 87.1 Calculating Glycemic Load TABLE 87.2 How to Interpret Glycemic Index
(GI) and Glycemic Load (GL)
Example: Watermelon
Glycemic index (GI) = 72 (high) Foods that have a low GL almost always have a low GI.
Glycemic load (GL) = 4 (low) Foods with an intermediate or high GL range from a very
Amount of carbohydrates per serving: 6 g (low) low to very high GI.5
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
87 Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load 865
DISEASE PREVENTION AND glucose spike after an excessively high-GL food consump-
MANAGEMENT tion significantly reduces the mitochondria’s capacity for
oxidative phosphorylation, driving an increase in free rad-
Diabetes and Blood Sugar Control icals.8 High-GI foods or meals with a high GL also cause
an increase in postprandial inflammatory mediators and
Medical nutrition therapy is the first line of treatment markers such as CRP, cytokines, and endothelin-1.8 On
for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes the contrary, minimally processed low-GI foods or meals
and plays an essential part in the management of type with a low GL do not result in adverse inflammatory
1 diabetes. Although the American Diabetes Associa- effects.9 One study showed a strong association between
tion still recommends carbohydrate counting as a main a high dietary GL and elevated CRP levels in 244 mid-
strategy for diabetes management, the Diabetic Associa- dle-aged women where CRP levels almost doubled in the
tions in Europe, Canada, and Australia have all recom- low versus high dietary GL groups.28 Therefore it is not
mended high-fiber, low-GI foods for individuals with surprising that most antiinflammatory diets, such as the
diabetes as a means of improving postprandial glycemia Mediterranean diet, advocate plant-based, nonprocessed
and weight control.2,10,11 Many studies have shown that food approaches that are low in GL.
low dietary GI and GL is effective in the prevention12-16
and management of diabetes by improving insulin sen-
sitivity and lowering glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Cancer
levels and fructosamine in diabetic patients.14,17-19 In a A number of prospective cohort studies have shown
recent cohort study in Hawaii, a high-GL diet showed an that diets high in GI and GL are both associated with
increased incidence of diabetes.13 In a randomized, open- an increased risk of breast cancer29,30 and colorectal
label, crossover study, a low-GI diet for 3 months pro- cancers.31 The same association was also demonstrated
duced greater weight loss, body fat reduction, and body in a case-control study in Italy for ovarian cancer.32 A
mass index (BMI) reduction than a standard diabetes positive association has also been noted in studies with
diet.17 There were also fewer reported episodes of hypo- dietary GL, but not GI, on gastric cancers33 and endo-
glycemia and hyperglycemia in patients on a low-GI diet metrial cancers.34-36 In a large prospective cohort study
compared with those on a carbohydrate exchange diet.19 in Italy of 47,749 subjects, results showed that a high-
GI diet was associated with an increased rate of colorec-
tal cancer, especially in those with a higher waist-to-hip
Weight Management and Cardiovascular ratio.31 However, there are currently no strong associa-
Disease (CVD) Prevention tions found for pancreatic cancers.37,38
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
866 PART III Tools for Your Practice
TABLE 87.3 Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values for Select Foods
Glycemic Index Available Carbohy- Glycemic Load
Food Item (glucose = 100) Serving Size (g) drates (g/serving) (per serving)
Bakery Products
Angel food cake 67 50 29 19
Pound cake 54 53 28 15
Apple muffin (no sugar) 48 ± 10 60 19 9
Bran muffin 60 57 24 15
Oatmeal 69 50 35 24
Pancakes 67 ± 5 80 58 39
Waffles 76 35 13 10
Beverages
Coca-Cola 63 250 mL 26 16
Smoothie drink, soy, banana 30 ± 3 250 mL 22 7
Apple juice, pure, cloudy, unsweetened 37 ± 3 250 mL 28 10
Cranberry juice cocktail 68 ± 3 250 mL 36 24
Orange juice 50 ± 4 250 mL 26 13
Tomato juice, canned, no sugar 38 ± 4 250 mL 9 4
Gatorade 78 ± 13 250 mL 15 12
Breads
Bagel (white) 72 70 35 25
Baguette (white) 95 ± 15 30 15 15
Oat bran bread 44 30 18 8
Rye-kernel bread (whole-grain pumpernickel) 46 30 11 5
Wheat bread (80% intact kernels and 20% 52 30 20 10
white-wheat flour)
Wonder enriched white bread 73 ± 2 30 14 10
Healthy Choice Hearty 7-Grain bread 55 ± 6 30 14 8
Breakfast Cereals and Related Products
All-Bran 38 30 23 9
Cheerios 74 30 20 15
Cornflakes 92 30 26 24
Muesli 66 ± 9 30 24 17
Pop-Tarts, double chocolate 70 ± 2 50 36 25
Raisin Bran 61 ± 5 30 19 12
Special K 69 ± 5 30 21 14
Cereal Grains
Sweet corn 60 150 33 20
Taco shells, cornmeal 68 20 12 8
White rice, boiled 64 ± 7 150 36 23
Parboiled white rice (high amylose) 35 ± 4 150 39 14
Brown rice, steamed 50 150 33 16
Cracked wheat, bulgur 48 ± 2 150 26 12
Semolina (roasted or steamed) 55 ± 1 150 11 6
Cookies
Graham wafers 74 25 18 14
Vanilla wafers 77 25 18 14
Crackers
Breton crackers (wheat) 67 25 14 10
Corn thins 87 ± 10 25 20 18
Rice cakes (low amylose) 91 ± 7 25 21 19
Rye crispbread 63 25 16 10
Stoned wheat thins 67 25 17 12
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
87 Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load 867
Key Web
TABLE 87.3 Resources
Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values for Select Foods—cont’d
Glycemic Index Available Carbohy- Glycemic Load
Food Item (glucose = 100) Serving Size (g) drates (g/serving) (per serving)
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
868 PART III Tools for Your Practice
TABLE 87.3 Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values for Select Foods—cont’d
Glycemic Index Available Carbohy- Glycemic Load
Food Item (glucose = 100) Serving Size (g) drates (g/serving) (per serving)
Vegetables
Beetroot 64 ± 16 80 7 5
Carrots (raw) 16 80 8 1
Corn (sweet, boiled) 60 80 18 11
Green peas 48 ± 5 80 7 3
Parsnips 97 ± 19 80 12 12
Baked potato (in skin) 60 150 30 18
Yam (peeled, boiled) 37 ± 8 150 36 13
Modified from Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin
Nutr. 2002;76:5–56.
REFERENCES
References are available online at ExpertConsult.com.
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
REFERENCES 22. Fan J, Song Y, Wang Y, et al.: Dietary glycemic index, glycemic
load, and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and stroke mor-
1. Liu S, Willett WC: Dietary glycemic load and atherothrombotic tality: a systematic review with meta-analysis, PLoS One 7:e52182,
risk, Curr Atheroscler Rep 4:454–461, 2002. 2012.
2. Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA, Brand-Miller JC: International table 23. Mirrahimi A, de Souza RJ, Chiavaroli L, et al.: Associations of gly-
of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002, Am J Clin Nutr cemic index and load with coronary heart disease events: a system-
76:5–56, 2002. atic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts, J Am Heart
3. Ludwig DS: The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms Assoc 1:e000752, 2012.
relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, JAMA 24. Dong JY, Zhang YH, Wang P, et al.: Meta-analysis of dietary gly-
287:2414–2423, 2002. cemic load and glycemic index in relation to risk of coronary heart
4. Lennerz BS, Alsop DC, Holsen LM, et al.: Effects of dietary gly- disease, Am J Cardiol 109:1608–1613, 2012.
cemic index on brain regions related to reward and craving in men, 25. Reference deleted in author review.
Am J Clin Nutr 98:641–647, 2013. 26. Shikany JM, Tinker LF, Neuhouser ML, et al.: Association of gly-
5. Mendosa, D: Revised international table of glycemic index (GI) and cemic load with cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Women’s
glycemic load (GL) values—2008: http://www.mendosa.com/gilists. Health Initiative Observational Study, Nutrition 26:641–647, 2010.
html. Accessed 12/5/2016. 27. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, et al.: Activation of oxidative stress by
6. Fernandes G, Velangi A, Wolever TM: Glycemic index of potatoes acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyper-
commonly consumed in North America, J Am Diet Assoc 105:557– glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, JAMA 295:1681–1687,
562, 2005. 2006.
7. Dansinger, M: How to use the glycemic index: http://www.webmd.com/ 28. Liu S, Manson JE, Buring JE: Relation between a diet with a
diabetes/guide/glycemic-index-good-versus-bad-carbs 2. Accessed high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity
12/25/2016. C-reactive protein in middle-aged women, Am J Clin Nutr 75:492–
8. O’Keefe JH, Gheewala NM, O’Keefe JO: Dietary strategies for 498, 2002. 2002. 11864854.
improving post-prandial glucose, lipids, inflammation, and cardio- 29. Mullie P, Koechlin A, Boniol M, et al.: Relation between breast
vascular health, J Am Coll Cardiol 51:249–255, 2008. cancer and high glycemic index or glycemic load: a meta-analysis
9. Egger G, Dixon J: Should obesity be the main game? Or do we of prospective cohort studies, Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56:152–159,
need an environmental makeover to combat the inflammatory and 2016.
chronic disease epidemics? Obes Rev 10:237–249, 2009. 30. Sieri S, Pala V, Brighenti F, et al.: Dietary glycemic index, glycemic
10. Franz MJ, Bantle JP, Beebe CA, et al.: Evidence-based nutrition load, and the risk of breast cancer in an Italian prospective cohort
principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention study, Am J Clin Nutr 86:160–166, 2007.
of diabetes and related complications, Diabetes Care 26:51S–61S, 31. Sieri S, Krogh V, Agnoli C, et al.: Dietary glycemic index and gly-
2003. cemic load and risk of colorectal cancer: results from the EPIC-
11. Marsh K, Barclay A, Colagiuri S: Glycemic index and glycemic load Italy study, Int J Cancer 136:2923–2931, 2015.
of carbohydrates in the diabetes diet, Curr Diab Rep 11:120–127, 32. Augustin LS, Polesel J, Bosetti C, et al.: Dietary glycemic index,
2011. glycemic load and ovarian cancer risk: a case-control study in Italy,
12. Bhupathiraju SN, Tobias DK, Malik VS, et al.: Glycemic Ann Oncol 14:78–84, 2003.
index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 3 33. Augustin LS, Gallus S, Negri E, et al.: Glycemic index, glycemic
large US cohorts and an updated meta-analysis, Am J Clin Nutr load and risk of gastric cancer, Ann Oncol 15:581–584, 2004.
100:218–232, 2014. 34. Gnagnarella P, Gandini S, La Vecchia C, et al.: Glycemic index,
13. Hopping BN, Erber E, Grandinetti A, et al.: Dietary fiber, magne- glycemic load, and cancer risk: a meta-analysis, Am J Clin Nutr
sium, and glycemic load alter risk of type 2 diabetes in a multiethnic 87:1793–1801, 2008.
cohort in Hawaii, J Nutr 140:68–74, 2010. 35. Nagle CM, Olsen CM, Ibiebele TI, et al.: Glycemic index, glyce-
14. Marsh K, Barclay A, Colagiuri S, et al.: Glycemic index and gly- mic load and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Australian
cemic load of carbohydrates in the diabetes diet, Curr Diab Rep National Endometrial Cancer study and an updated systematic
11:120–127, 2011. review and meta-analysis, Eur J Nutr 52:705–715, 2013.
15. Greenwood DC, Threapleton DE, Evans CE, et al.: Glycemic 36. Mulholland HG, Murray LJ, Cardwell CR, et al.: Dietary glycae-
index, glycemic load, carbohydrates, and type 2 diabetes: system- mic index, glycaemic load and endometrial and ovarian cancer risk:
atic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies, a systematic review and meta-analysis, Br J Cancer 99:434–441,
Diabetes Care 36:4166–4171, 2013. 2008.
16. Dong JY, Zhang L, Zhang YH, et al.: Dietary glycaemic index and 37. Patel AV, McCullough ML, Pavluck AL, et al.: Glycemic load,
glycaemic load in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta- glycemic index, and carbohydrate intake in relation to pancreatic
analysis of prospective cohort studies, Br J Nutr 106:1649–1654, cancer risk in a large US cohort, Cancer Causes Control 18:287–294,
2011. 2007.
17. Visek J, Lacigova S, Cechurova D, et al.: Comparison of a low- 38. Heinen MM, Verhage BA, Lumey L, et al.: Glycemic load, glyce-
glycemic index vs standard diabetic diet, Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ mic index, and pancreatic cancer risk in the Netherlands Cohort
Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 158:112–116, 2014. Study, Am J Clin Nutr 87:970–977, 2008.
18. Thomas DE, Elliott EJ: The use of low-glycaemic index diets in 39. Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, et al.: Glycemic load, glyce-
diabetes control, Br J Nutr 104:797–802, 2010. mic index, and carbohydrate intake in relation to risk of cholecys-
19. Thomas D, Elliott EJ: Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, tectomy in women, Gastroenterology 129:105–112, 2005.
diets for diabetes mellitus, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006296, 40. Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, et al.: Dietary carbohydrates
2009. and glycaemic load and the incidence of symptomatic gall stone
20. Maki KC, Rains TM, Kaden VN, et al.: Effects of a reduced-glyce- disease in men, Gut 54:823–828, 2005.
mic-load diet on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascu- 41. Bronsnick T, Murzaku EC, Rao BK: Diet in dermatology: Part I.
lar disease risk markers in overweight and obese adults, Am J Clin Atopic dermatitis, acne, and nonmelanoma skin cancer, J Am Acad
Nutr 85:724–734, 2007. Dermatol 71:1039.e1–1039.e12, 2014.
21. Mirrahimi A, Chiavaroli L, Srichaikul K, et al.: The role of gly- 42. Smith RN, Mann NJ, Braue A, et al.: A low-glycemic-load diet
cemic index and glycemic load in cardiovascular disease and its improves symptoms in acne vulgaris patients: a randomized con-
risk factors: a review of the recent literature, Curr Atheroscler Rep
16:381, 2014. trolled trial, Am J Clin Nutr 86:107–115, 2007.
868.e1
Downloaded for Aman Shah (a.shah.1@elsevier.com) at Elsevier - Demonstration Account from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on December 21, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.