You are on page 1of 61

Downstream Processing

(Textbook Chapter 11 &


Supplemental Chapter 11)
Topics
Downstream processing needed to separate cell mass & other
byproducts from the water solvent
Major categories
 Separation of solids & liquids
• Filtration
• Centrifugation
 Drying of solids
• Dryness limited by the dryness of air & adhesion of water to solid
 Separation of soluble components
• Adsorption – chromatography as special case

Updated: November 27, 2017


2
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Typical process to manufacture enzymes

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.

Updated: November 27, 2017


3
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Need for downstream processing

Fermentation products are formed in dilute solutions


 Remove water without harming the products formed
 Byproducts?
Biological products are labile (i.e., sensitive to temperature,
solvents, etc.)
Fermentation broths are susceptible to contamination

Updated: November 27, 2017


4
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
General processing schemes

1. Cell removal 2. Cell disruption & cell debris


 If the cells are the product then removal
little additional processing may  Required if product is within the
be required cells
 Removal of the cells may make • Cell debris must then be
the separation of liquid species removed
easier  Option
 Options.. • High pressure homogenization
• Filtration
• Microfiltration
• Centrifugation

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
General processing schemes (cont.)

3. Primary isolation 4. Product enrichment


 Remove components that are very  Separation of product for high
different from the product concentrations
• May not be selective but  Option…
overall help the efficiency of • Chromatography
other separation
 Options… 5. Final isolation
• Solvent extraction  Depends on product, phase, &
final purity
• Two-phase liquid extraction
 Options…
• Adsorption
• Ultrafiltration (liquid)
• Precipitation
• Crystallization followed by
• Ultrafiltration
centrifugation, filtration, and
drying (solids)

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Generalized downstream processing schemes

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.

Updated: November 27, 2017


7
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Water Content & Drying

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Drying

Remove relatively small amounts of residual water and/or solvent


 May be necessary to minimize chemical or physical degradation
Relative terms – “dry” may range form 0 to 20 wt% water
Energy intensive operation

Updated: November 27, 2017


9
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Water Content of Air

Absolute humidity defined as the ratio of the mass of water in dry


air
mW mW
Humidity   wW 
mair mW  mair
Relative humidity is the actual amount of water compared to the
maximum amount at the same pressure & temperature
pW
Relative humidity  sat
 100% where pW  yW P
pW

May also discuss properties of “wet bulb” temperature, …

Updated: November 27, 2017


10
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Water Content of Air

Example: What is the wet bulb


temperature for air @ 80oF &
60% relative humidity?
Answer: 70oF

Ref: GPSA Data Book, 13th ed.


Updated: November 27, 2017
11
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Water Content of Solids

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.

Updated: November 27, 2017


12
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Mechanisms of Drying

Moisture transport in solids


 Molecular diffusion of liquid water
 Capillary flow of liquid water within porous solids
 Molecular diffusion of vapor evaporated within the solid
 Convective transport of vapor evaporated within the solid
When the drying rate is controlled
by the vaporization of water from
the surface then the heat transfer &
mass transfer effects are balanced
hs Ah  Ta  T 

Nc    kG a  X  Xa 

Hvap
Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed
Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


13
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Drying Time

Can define the rate of drying to the water content of the solids
dX m
N  ms where X  w
dt ms
ms dX
n A  
A dt

Over the period of constant rate of drying

X ms

Nc  ms  t   X0  X1 
t N c

Updated: November 27, 2017


14
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Drying Example – Humidity of Air

Dry sodium benzyl penicillin to a


moisture content of 20 wt% (wet
basis). Use air at 25oC & 1 atm
pressure in a fluidized bed drier.
Assume equilibrium (open circles)
Target dry basis water content:
20 kg water
X0   0.25  25
80 100 kg dry mass
Required relative humidity – 65% (from chart)
Mole fraction water – water’s vapor pressure @ 25oC is 3.17 kPa
pw 0.65 P sat 0.65  3.17 
yw     0.020
P P 101.28
Updated: November 27, 2017
15
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Drying Time Example

Want to dry 10 kg washed filter cake (wet basis) from 15% to 8%


water (both wet bases) under constant drying conditions
 Drying area 1.2 m²
 Air temperature 35oC & surface temperature of solids 28oC
 Heat transfer coefficient 25 J/m²·sec·oC
 Drying time?
From initial conditions:
mw ,0 mw ,0
  0.15  mw ,0  1.5 and ms  8.5
mw ,0  ms 100
1.5
 X0   0.176
8.5

Updated: November 27, 2017


16
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Drying Time Example (cont.)

Final conditions
mw ,1 0.08  8.5
 0.08  mw ,1   0.74
mw ,1  8.5 1 0.08
0.74
 X1   0.087
8.5
Rate of drying

h A  T  T   251.2  35  28  5 kg
N c  s h a   8.62  10
H vap 2435.4  103 sec

Drying time
8.5
5 
t  0.176  0.087   8770 sec  2.4 hr
8.62  10
Updated: November 27, 2017
17
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Freeze Drying

Wet solids are frozen then exposed to vacuum – water directly


sublimes from solid to vapor state
Steps
 Freezing
 Primary drying (sublimation)
 Secondary drying (desorption)

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


18
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Cell Removal

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration

Solid particles removed from a fluid suspension by forcing the fluid


through a filter media which holds back the solid particles
Ease of filtration depends on the properties of the solid & fluid
 Crystalline incompressible solids fairly easy to filter, …
 Fermentation broths not so much
• Small particle size & gelatinous nature
May use filter aids to improve efficiency of
filtration

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


20
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration Equipment

Plate & frame filter press


 Batch operation
 Accumulates solids. Must be opened & cleaned
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4wBd1_CvNw
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOQPr7Eomek
Rotary drum filters
 Can be operated continuously
 Can be operated at pressure with controlled atmosphere
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSflxzE0nIo
Horizontal belt filters
 Continuous operation
 Typically pull a vacuum below the filter
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6voXE1HxYsY

Updated: November 27, 2017


21
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration Theory

Rate of filtration depends on the pressure drop across the cake and
the filter media
1 dVf P P P
  
A dt  m     cV    cV 
 f   solids 
 mR  f   f   Rm   f   f 
  A     A    A 

 Rm is the resistance due to the filter media & is typically negligible


compared to the resistance due to the cake
 Various correlations to relate  (the specific cake resistance) to the cake
properties
• Compressible cake Rigid particles
Kv a2 1  
    P  
s

 3 p

Updated: November 27, 2017


22
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration Theory

Can integrate the reciprocal form…


1 dVf P dt  Vf   f Rm
  A   f c  
A dt   cVf   dVf  AP  P
f     Rm 
  A  
t Vf V
 Vf 
f
 f Rm
A  dt    f c   dVf   dVf
0 0  AP  0
 P
 f c  Vf2   f Rm
At    Vf
2  AP  P
Linearized form
t  f c  f Rm
 2 Vf 
Vf 2A  P  A  P 

Updated: November 27, 2017


23
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration Example

Can filter 30 mL broth from penicillin fermentation on 3 cm² filter in


4.5 min using 5 psi pressure drop. Neglect media resistance & use
s=0.5:
    P     P 
s 0.5

Lab conditions to “tune” filter equation


 f   P  c 2A2t  P  2  3   4.5 5
0.5 0.5 2 0.5
t psi0.5min
 Vf   f c    0.201
Vf 2A  P 
2
Vf
2
30 
2
cm2

Filter 500 L broth in 1 hour using 10 psi pressure drop


 f   P  c  f c 
0.5
t
 Vf  A  Vf  11500 cm2  1.15 m2
Vf 2A  P 
2
2t  P 
0.5

Updated: November 27, 2017


24
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Filtration Example (cont.)

What if the cake is much less compressible? Let’s resize with s=0.1:
    P     P 
s 0.1

Lab conditions to “tune” filter equation

 f   P  c 2A2t  P  2  3  4.5 5
0.5 0.1 2 0.9
t psi0.9min
 Vf   f c    0.383
Vf 2A  P 
2
V f
2
30 
2
cm2

Filter 500 L broth in 1 hour using 10 psi pressure drop


 f   P  c  f c 
0.1
t
 Vf  A  Vf  10000 cm2  1.0 m2
Vf 2A2  P  2t  P 
0.9

Compressible cake will require more surface area

Updated: November 27, 2017


25
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Centrifugation

Increase the “gravitational” field


experienced by particles to
promote faster settling times
Stoke’s law:
 p  L  p  L
ug  d p2g  uC  d p22 r
18L 18L
Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed
Z is the ratio of the acceleration due Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

to the centrifuge relative to the acceleration due to gravity


(the g-force), 2r/g
 Industrial centrifuges can achieve 16,000, small lab centrifuges up to
500,000

Updated: November 27, 2017


26
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Equipment – Tubular Bowl Centrifuge

http://slideplayer.es/slide/7225569/24/images/11/EQUIPOS+DE+CENTRIFUGACI%C3%93N.jpg

Updated: November 27, 2017


27
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Equipment – Disc Stack Bowl
Centrifuge

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


28
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Equipment – Disc Stack Bowl Centrifuge

Can be run in batch or continuous


modes
 Batch mode – equipment stopped,
opening up, & solids removed
 Continuous – either side discharge or
movement of solids out the top
• Disadvantage – the solids must
remain wet to allow them to move
Video: Alfa Laval PX Disc Stack
Centrifuge
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
ZmTMz4VkAwI http://www.alfalaval.com/globalassets/images/products/se
paration/centrifugal-separators/disc-stack-separators/sx-
bowl_440x360.png

Updated: November 27, 2017


29
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Equipment – Decanter Separator

Andritz 2-phase decanter with CIP (clean in place)


 Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqEODWcJwnY

http://www.gn-decanter-centrifuge.com/mud/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/decanter-1.png

Updated: November 27, 2017


30
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Centrifuge Performance

Relate the performance based Disc stack bowl centrifuge


on the centrifuge’s cross-
sectional area to that of a 22  N  1
gravity separator 
3g tan   
 3
r
2  r13 


Q

2ug Tubular bowl centrifuge

Two centrifuges that operate 2b 2 2 22br 2


with equal effectiveness

2g
 3r2  r1  
g

1 Q
Q 2

1 2

Updated: November 27, 2017


31
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Centrifuge Example

Use continuous disc stack centrifuge @ 5000 rpm to recover 50% baker’s yeast
cells at 60 L/min.
 Found that at constant rpm the solids recovery factor is inversely proportional to flow rate

At 5000 rpm what flow rate will give 90% solids recovery?
1
Y  Q  1 Y1   60  0.5  33.3 L/min
2  Q

Q Y2 0.9
What rpm necessary to get 90% recovery @ 60 L/min?
 At equal effectiveness by adjusting flowrate:

1 Q
Q 2 2 Q 2 33.3
     0.556
1 2 
1 Q1 60
 By adjusting rotational speed:
2 22 1
 0.556  2  2   6710 rpm
1 1 0.556
Updated: November 27, 2017
32
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Separation of Soluble
Components

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Separation of Soluble Components

Liquid-liquid extraction
Precipitation
 Followed by solid/liquid separation & possibly drying
Adsorption
 Chromatography a special case
Membrane separations
 Dialysis (separation by selective membrane)
 Reverse Osmosis – transport of water from low to higher concentration
 Ultrafiltration & microfiltration
 Electrodialysis
Crystallization

Updated: November 27, 2017


34
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Absorption vs Adsorption

Absorption Adsorption

From Prof. Art Kidnay

Updated: November 27, 2017


35
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption

Chemical species cling to the surface of the adsorbent allowing


species that don’t adsorb to pass on by
Equilibrium relationship between components in liquid & to surface
CLSm KLCL*
C  KF  C 
1/ n
*
S
*
L (Freundlich) C 
*
S (Langmuir)
1 KLCL*
Differential material balance in a packed bed column
CL C C
u   L   1   S
z t t
Including overall mass transfer coefficient
dCS CL C
  KLa   CL  CL*   u   L   1   KLa   CL  CL* 
dt z t

Updated: November 27, 2017


36
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption (cont.)

Approximate steady flow through fixed-bed adsorption column as a


steady-state moving-bed operation
dCL
u   1   KLa   CL  CL* 
dz
Can integrate to determine the height of a column for a particular
degree of separation
H CL 0
u dCL
H   dz  
0 1   KLa  CL
CL  CL*

Need the equilibrium relationship to fully integrate

Updated: November 27, 2017


37
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption (cont.)

Mass balance considerations on the adsorbent


provides an operating line & relates the
concentrations in the liquid & on the solid
F  CL0  0   B  CS* 0  0 
B CL CL0
  *
F CS CS 0

F is the liquid volumetric flow (uA) & B is the


resin’s volumetric flow

Updated: November 27, 2017


38
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption (cont.)

Fixed beds can be thought to have three zones:


 Saturated zone
 Adsorption zone – also called the mass transfer zone
 Virgin zone
We would stop flow before the adsorption zone gets to the exit
(i.e., before the virgin zone goes completely to zero)
If we let the zones travel
through the column then
we would get a typical
breakthrough curve

Updated: November 27, 2017


39
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption (cont.)

Updated: November 27, 2017


40
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption Example

Separate cephalosporin on to an ion-exchange resin


 Bed is 4 cm diameter
 Resin density is 1.3 g/cm³ & packed to 0.8 cm³ resin per cm³ bed
 Feed solution CL0 = 5 g/L
 Broth superficial velocity u = 1.5 m/h & broth to resin feed ratio F/B = 10
 Equilibrium relationship CS = 25 (C*L)1/2 & mass transfer KLa = 15 h-1
 What is the height necessary to get CL = 0.2 g/L?

B CL CL0 1
  *   CS  10 CL and CS* 0  10 CL0
F CS CS 0 10
1 *2 1
C  25  C  10 CL   0.16 CL2
1/2 2
*
S
*
L  CL*  CS 
625 625

Updated: November 27, 2017


41
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Adsorption Example (cont.)

Substitute into integral equation for the height


CL 0
u dCL
1   KLa  C
H
L
CL  CL*
5
1.5 dCL
 0.815 0.2 CL  0.16 CL2


5
1.5   CL 
 ln  
    
0.8 15 1  0.16 CL   0.2

 0.6 m

Amount of resin needed?


  4
2
D 2
mresin  resin H  1.3   60   980 g
4 4
Updated: November 27, 2017
42
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography

Form of adsorption where chemical species adsorb & desorb at


different rates
 Those species that interact most strongly with the stationary phase will elute
later than those species that weakly interact
 Separation of a “pulse” of mixture
• Followed up by more solvent
• Recovered material separated from the other species of the original
mixture but diluted with more solvent
• Can obtain multiple products from each pulse
We’ll focus on chromatography as a batch process
 Continuous & semi-continuous options
• Moving Bed Chromatography
• Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography
Updated: November 27, 2017
43
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography

Concentrations in the separation


of mixture with 3 solutes
Species that adsorb onto the
stationary phase the least will
elute the earliest

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


44
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Methods

Adsorption chromatography (ADC) Affinity chromatography (AFC)


 Controlled by weak van der Waals  Based on specific chemical
forces & steric interactions interactions between solute molecules
& ligands
Liquid-liquid partition
 Possible to get very high resolution
chromatography (LLC) (degree of separation) but expensive
Ion-exchange chromatography (IEC) sorbent
 Adsorption of ions on resin particles Hydrophobic chromatography (HC)
by electrostatic forces
 Widely used, especially for protein High-pressure liquid chromatography
recovery (HPLC)
Gel Permeation Chromatography –
Size Exclusion Chromatography
 Smaller molecules wander into the
pores of the solid

Updated: November 27, 2017


45
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

The species will move through the chromatography column slower


than the rest of the solvent – differential migration
Given enough
column length the
species will elute
from column with
little to no overlap

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


46
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Zone Spreading

Elution bands spread out so each solute takes time to pass across
the end of the column
Factors that lead to zone spreading
 Axial diffusion
 Eddy diffusion
 Local nonequilibrium effects
Minimize zone spreading by improving mass transfer more closely
approach equilibrium between the phases
 Good: increasing the particle surface area per unit volume
 Bad: increasing liquid flow rate

Updated: November 27, 2017


47
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors
 Ve – volume of eluting solvent needed to carry the solute through column
 Vo – void volume in the column (·Vempty)
• In gel chromatography (size exclusion) there is also a volume term for the
interstitial volume only accessible by the smaller molecules
 ki – capacity factor for species “i”
V  Vo
ki  e ,i
Vo
  – selectivity between components “1” & “2”
k
 1
k2

Updated: November 27, 2017


48
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors based on solute peaks as normal distributions


 ymax,i – Maximum concentration of eluting peak
 tmax,i – Time at which peak elutes
  – Standard deviation of peak shape

  t  t 2 
y i  ymax, i exp   
max, i

 2  tmax,i  
2
 

Updated: November 27, 2017


49
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors based on solute peaks as normal distributions


 Yi –Yield of solute (ratio amount recovered
to total in original mixture & recoverable)
t

 Vy
 i dt
Yt ,i  0

 Vy
0
 i dt

 Cumulative yield for normal distribution

1    t  tmax,i   
Yt ,i  1 erf  
2
  2  tmax,i   
 Incremental yield the difference between the cumulative yields @ two times

Updated: November 27, 2017


50
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors based on solute peaks as normal distributions


 Excel has functions for normal Gaussian distributions – scaled so that the
cumulative amount is 1

Cumulative: NORM.DIST( x, mean, standard_dev, TRUE )

Differential: NORM.DIST( x, mean, standard_dev, FALSE )

Updated: November 27, 2017


51
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors based on solute peaks as normal distributions


 2 is essentially a Peclet number – ratio of flowrate to reaction rate
u V / A
 
2

ka L ka L

• Value depends on the rate controlling step


ud 2
 
2
Internal diffusion control
L
1/2 3/2
u / d
2  External film control
L
2
ud
2  Taylor diffusion
DL

Updated: November 27, 2017


52
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Descriptors based on HETP concept


 N – Number of theoretical stages (theoretical plates)
2
V 
N  16  e 
w
 HETP – Height of a theoretical plate (L = length of column)
L
H
N

Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 2nd ed


Pauline Doran, Elsevier Science & Technology

Updated: November 27, 2017


53
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Separation of Peaks

Resolution – ratio distance of solute to solvent


 Resolution between two adjacent peaks

tmax, j  tmax,i
RS 
1
2
 tw , j  tw , i 
tmax, j  tmax,i 2 Ve ,2  Ve ,1 
 
1
 4 j tmax, j    4i 4tmax,i   w2  w1
2 
 Assume the spreading is about the same
(w2 = w1) & use concept of number of theoretical
stages…
Ve ,2  Ve ,1 1 Ve ,2  Ve ,1 1    1  k2 
RS   N  N  
w 4 Ve ,2 4     k2  1

Updated: November 27, 2017


54
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Material Balance

Assume downward flow through a fixed-bed chromatography


column – adsorbed species come to very quick
equilibrium with the adsorbent
Following a small pulse (moving reference system)
CL  CL CS 
 A  0
x  V V 
Integrated form…
V
x 
A    M f  CL  

Uses equilibrium relationship…


CS  M f  CL  and f  CL   d f/ dCL

Updated: November 27, 2017


55
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Material Balance Example #1

Chromatography column 10 cm long with cross sectional. Packed with adsorbent,


=0.35 & M=50 mg adsorbent per mL column volume. Adsorption isotherm given
by:
f  CL   0.2 CL3
Determine position of the solute band & solvent front when ΔV=250 mL &
CL=0.05 mg/mL
 Solvent front:
V 250 cm3
x    71.4 cm
A 10 cm   0.35
2

 Solute:
f  CL   0.6 CL2 f  CL   0.6  0.05  0.0015
2

V 250
x    58.8 cm
A   M  f  CL   10 0.35  50  0.0015 
Updated: November 27, 2017
56
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Material Balance Example #2

Ion-exchange chromatography to purify 20 g of Protein A.


Operate column @ 20 cm/hr. Peak exits at 80 min (tmax) with 10
min standard deviation ( tmax).
How long must the column be run to get 95% yield?

1    t  tmax,i   
Yt ,i  erf    1
2   2  tmax,i   
   
1    t  80   
 erf    1  0.95
2   2 10   
 

 By iterative solution t = 96.4 min

Updated: November 27, 2017


57
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Chromatography Material Balance Example #3

Let’s double the flowrate to 40 cm/hr. Assume the peak spreading


depends on Taylor diffusion.
How long must the column be run to get 95% yield?
 Adjust the tmax &  parameters
tmax,2 u1 20 cm/hr
   0.5  tmax,2  40 min
tmax,1 u2 40 cm/hr
22 u2  10 
 2  2  1 2    2  0.177
1 u1
2
 80 
 By iterative solution t = 51.6 min
1  
Yt , i  erf 
 t  40   
  1  0.95
2   2  0.177  40   
 
Updated: November 27, 2017
58
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Material Balance Examples #2 & #3

Example #3 requires relatively more time because of the change in


peak shape at the two velocities

Updated: November 27, 2017


59
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Summary

Updated: November 27, 2017


John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)
Summary

Downstream processing needed to separate cell mass & other


byproducts from the water solvent
Major categories
 Separation of solids & liquids
• Bulk separation – chemical species remain in their respective phases
• Types
o Filtration
o Centrifugation
 Drying of solids
• Dryness limited by the dryness of air & adhesion of water to solid
 Separation of soluble components
• Adsorption – chromatography as special case

Updated: November 27, 2017


61
John Jechura (jjechura@mines.edu)

You might also like