NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-.

Type III Hypersensitivity Reaction

Authors

Norina Usman1; Pavan Annamaraju2.

Affiliations
1 VA palo alto Stanford CA
2 Loma Linda University

Last Update: May 22, 2023.

Continuing Education Activity

A hypersensitivity reaction is an inappropriate or overreactive immune response to an antigen resulting in undesirable effects. The symptoms
typically appear in individuals who had at least one previous exposure to the antigen. The principle feature that separates type III reactions from
other hypersensitivity reactions is that in type III reactions, the antigen-antibody complexes are pre-formed in the circulation before their
deposition in tissues. This activity outlines the evaluation and treatment of different diseases of type III hypersensitivity reactions and highlights
the role of the interprofessional team in evaluating and treating patients with this condition.

Objectives:

Describe the etiology of type III hypersensitivity reactions.

Summarize the pathophysiology of type III hypersensitivity reaction.

Explain the management of type III hypersensitivity reaction.

Review the interprofessional team strategies that can enhance patient outcomes.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction
A hypersensitivity reaction is an inappropriate or overreactive immune response to an antigen resulting in undesirable effects. The symptoms
typically appear in individuals who had at least one previous exposure to the antigen. Hypersensitivity reactions can be classified into four types:
 Type I - IgE mediated immediate reaction

Type II - Antibody-mediated cytotoxic reaction (IgG or IgM antibodies)

Type III - Immune complex-mediated reaction

Type IV - Cell-mediated, delayed hypersensitivity reaction

In type III hypersensitivity reactions, an abnormal immune response is mediated by the formation of antigen-antibody aggregates called "immune
complexes."[1] They can precipitate in various tissues such as skin, joints, vessels, or glomeruli and trigger the classical complement pathway.
Complement activation leads to the recruitment of inflammatory cells (monocytes and neutrophils) that release lysosomal enzymes and free
radicals at the site of immune complexes, causing tissue damage.

The most common diseases involving a type III hypersensitivity reaction are serum sickness, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis, systemic
lupus erythematosus, farmers' lung (hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and rheumatoid arthritis. The principle feature that separates type III reactions
from other hypersensitivity reactions is that in type III reactions, the antigen-antibody complexes are pre-formed in the circulation before their
deposition in tissues.[2]

Etiology
Serum sickness is caused by drugs containing a protein moiety of other species (heterologous protein), such as antivenins, vaccines, antitoxin, and
streptokinase. The heterologous protein can act as an antigen triggering the immune response. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies prepared
from rabbit, horse, or mouse serum-like anti-thymocyte globulin, OKT-3, have been found to cause type III hypersensitivity reactions.

Serum sickness-like reactions (SSLR) can be seen with synthetic monoclonal antibodies (chimeric protein). Infliximab, used in the management
of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease, and omalizumab, used to treat asthma, are known to be associated with SSLR.[3]

Stings from insects, ticks, and mosquito bites may cause serum sickness.[4]

Infectious diseases like hepatitis B and bacterial endocarditis present a continuous source of antigen to form circulating immune complexes.

Other examples of medications implicated in type III hypersensitivity reactions are cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin, furazolidone, griseofulvin,
lincomycin, metronidazole, para-aminosalicylic acid, penicillin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, tetracycline, allopurinol, barbiturates, bupropion,
captopril, carbamazepine, fluoxetine, and penicillamine.[5][6]

Epidemiology
The annual rate of serum sickness incidence is low. In one meta-analysis, the incidence of serum sickness following the administration of
Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab antivenom used for crotaline snake envenomation was 0.13%.[7] In another retrospective study, serum
sickness-like reactions to equine and human-derived rabies immunoglobulin were rare under the age of 10 years at 0.05% and 0.01%,
respectively.[8] A literature review of cefaclor-associated serum sickness-like disease found its incidence to be less than 0.2% per drug course,
with most cases occurring in children aged less than five years.[9]

Further, the probability of developing serum sickness is dependent on the dose and varies by antigen type. For example, serum sickness associated
with equine origin anti-rabies serum is more likely than tetanus antitoxin (16.3% vs. 2.5% to 5%).[10]

Pathophysiology
After exposure to antigen, an individual's immune system responds by creating antibodies after 4-10 days. The antibody reacts with the antigen,
forming immune complexes that circulate and can diffuse into the vascular walls, where they may initiate fixation and activation of complement.
These immune complexes, along with complement, produce an influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes into the site, where tissue damage takes
place by the release of proteolytic enzymes.[11][12] The process takes place in three steps:

1: Immune complex formation: Endogenous or exogenous antigen exposure triggers an antibody formation. Exogenous antigens are foreign
proteins such as infectious microbes or pharmaceutical products. Endogenous antigens are self-antigens against which autoantibodies are
generated (autoimmunity). In both cases, the antigens bind to antibodies, forming circulating immune complexes, later migrating out of plasma
and depositing in host tissues.

2: Immune complex deposition: The pathogenicity of immune complexes is partly dependent on the antigen-antibody ratio. When the antibody
is in excess, the complexes are insoluble, do not circulate, and are phagocytosed by macrophages in the lymph nodes and spleen. However, when
the antigen is in excess, the aggregates are smaller. They freely filter out of circulation in organs where the blood is transformed into fluids such
as urine and synovial fluid. Therefore, immune complexes affect glomeruli and joints.

3: Inflammatory reaction: After the deposition of the immune complexes, the final step is activating the classical pathway, leading to the release
of C3a and C5a, which then recruit macrophages and neutrophils and causes inflammatory damage to tissues. Depending on the site, symptoms of
vasculitis (blood vessels), arthritis (joints), or glomerulonephritis (glomeruli) develop.

History and Physical

The clinical manifestations of the immune-complex mediated disease depend on the type of antigen and route of exposure. For example,
intravenous entry of antigen can lead to vasculitis, arthritis, and glomerulonephritis. Inhalational entry can manifest with a pulmonary
syndrome termed hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Local injection of the antigen can cause necrotizing skin lesions called Arthus reaction. Immune-
complex-associated inflammation of the vessels of the dermis and subcutaneous fat can have manifestations such as purpuric rash, erythema
nodosum (tender red nodules on the anterior surface of lower extremities), or erythema multiforme (target lesions with minimal mucosal
involvement, often present in lower extremities).
The history and physical examination findings of common immune complex-mediated diseases are described below.

Serum Sickness: Before the advent of antibiotics, horse serum was used to treat patients with scarlet fever and pneumonia. The host antibodies
bind with the non-self antigens in horse sera to form immune complexes that deposit in the joints, subendothelial layer, and mesangium of the
glomeruli. The classic symptoms of serum sickness are rash, arthritis, and fever. Proteinuria can be seen with renal involvement. Symptoms
appear one to two weeks after exposure to the antigen. As the phagocytic system removes the immune complexes, in a few weeks, the symptom
resolution ensues with an overall excellent prognosis. In modern times, serum sickness is associated with exposure to heterologous (nonhuman)
protein (e.g., equine antisnake venom) or chimeric antibodies (rituximab/murine-rabbit chimeric anti-CD-20).[13] A serum sickness-like reaction
(SSLR) consisting of fever, rash, and arthralgia can be caused by antigens present in drugs such as cefaclor and penicillin.[9] The precise
mechanism of SSLR remains unclear; however, there could be a potential role of drug metabolites that are directly toxic to the cells. The features
of serum sickness, such as vasculitis and glomerulonephritis, are not present in SSLR.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP): HP, also known as extrinsic allergic alveolitis, is a respiratory syndrome that involves the deposition of
immune complexes in the alveoli, interstitium, terminal bronchioli, and lung parenchyma. The inhalation of antigen triggers an allergic immune
response that is IgE-mediated.[14] However, specific allergens predominantly cause IgG response consistent with type III hypersensitivity
disorder. The antigen can be a microbe, protein (plant or animal origin), or a chemical (organic and inorganic) present in the workplace or
at home.[15] A well-studied entity of HP is the farmers' lung, where agricultural workers are exposed to the antigens from thermophilic molds
(spores of Micropolyspora faeni and Thermoactinomyces Vulgaris) that grow on crops. Another example of HP is the bird fancier's disease, in
which the etiologic bird-related antigens include immunoglobulins, intestinal mucin present in bird droppings, or waxy coating of the feathers.
[16]

A high index of suspicion is needed for the diagnosis of HP. A thorough history should be conducted to elicit the environmental and occupational
exposure information of the patient.[17] In the acute phase (2-9 hours of antigen exposure), symptoms of fever, cough, and dyspnea may develop
that peak within 24 hours. Re-exposure to the antigen can cause worsening dyspnea. In chronic exposure, weight loss is
often present with respiratory symptoms. A physical examination may reveal inspiratory crackles, cyanosis, clubbing, or signs of right heart
failure.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): SLE is an autoimmune disease with multisystem involvement. The condition is characterized by the
presence of circulating IgG and IgM autoantibodies to host tissue components. In most cases, the antibodies are directed against the parts of the
nucleus, such as double-stranded DNA, histone, and ribonuclear proteins. In some patients, autoantibodies against the cells, including platelets,
erythrocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, can be present. The autoantibodies against the phospholipid moiety of the prothrombin activator
complex or cardiolipin can lead to a hypercoagulable state. Major clinical signs and symptoms spanning multiple organ systems are listed below:
[18]

General: Fever, weight loss, and fatigue

 Musculoskeletal: Arthralgias, arthritis, and myalgias

Mucocutaneous: Malar (butterfly) rash with photosensitivity, oral ulcers, alopecia

Cardiac: Pericarditis, endocarditis, myocarditis

Vascular: Raynauds phenomenon, predominantly small vessel vasculitis manifesting as petechiae, purpura, and superficial ulcers

Pulmonary: Pleural effusion, cough, and dyspnea

Gastrointestinal: Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain

Renal: Glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome, asymptomatic hematuria or proteinuria, diminished renal function

Hematological: Anemia, leukopenia, hemolysis, thrombosis, fetal loss in pregnancy

Central Nervous System: Headaches, seizures, stroke

The musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, and pulmonary systems are most commonly involved in SLE.

Post Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis (PSGN): The glomerular deposition of immune complexes triggered by nephritogenic strains of group
A beta-hemolytic streptococci causes PSGN. Symptoms are usually apparent between 1 and 3 weeks after a streptococcal throat infection or 3-6
weeks in cases of skin infection. The presenting features could include microscopic or gross hematuria, proteinuria, hypertension, edema, and
elevation in serum creatinine.[19]

Evaluation
In serum sickness, a complete blood count (CBC) with a differential count may show neutropenia, eosinophilia, or thrombocytopenia. Hepatitis
serologies can be performed to assess for hepatitis B infection. Inflammatory markers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive
protein (CRP) are elevated. Complement consumption will result in low C3, C4, and CH50 levels. Urinalysis may show mild proteinuria. Skin
lesions, when biopsied, may show leukocytoclastic vasculitis that is non-specific. There is no single test to diagnose serum sickness definitively.
The diagnosis primarily rests on the temporal association of antigen exposure to classic clinical manifestations, such as fever, arthritis, and rash.

Peripheral eosinophil count is usually normal in HP. Total IgG levels are often elevated. Precipitating antibodies in the patient’s serum against the
suspected causative agent can be tested, though this test has a low sensitivity. In the acute phase of HP, a chest X-ray can show patchy or
homogeneous, bilateral interstitial and alveolar nodular infiltrates. In chronic cases, fibrotic changes are noted. A High-resolution CT scan
(HRCT) has higher sensitivity than a chest X-ray and can help demonstrate the architectural changes in detail. Greater than 50% of lymphocytes
in bronchoalveolar lavage are suggestive of HP. There is no gold standard test to diagnose HP.[20][15]
An evaluation of SLE may include CBC with a differential metabolic panel, complement levels, and confirming the presence of antibodies. ANA
is sensitive and is almost a universal finding in SLE. Anti-dsDNA and anti-smith antibodies are specific to the diagnosis of SLE. The urinalysis
with microscopy and urine spot protein to creatinine ratio must be ordered to evaluate for possible nephritis and quantification of proteinuria. A
renal biopsy is needed for the definitive diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis. Appropriate imaging studies are required for the evaluation
of pulmonary and joint symptoms.

In PSGN, antibodies against streptolysin O, streptokinase, or deoxyribonuclease B can be elevated in up to 94.6% of cases.[21] Complement
levels are low. Urinalysis with microscopy can determine proteinuria, hematuria, and RBC casts. A kidney biopsy may show proliferative changes
on light microscopy; deposition of C3 and IgG in a diffuse granular pattern in the mesangium and glomerular capillary walls (starry sky
appearance) noted on immunofluorescence; immune complex deposits evident as subepithelial humps on electron microscopy. Throat cultures are
not a reliable test as only 10-20% of the patients who present with a sore throat in general clinical practice have a positive culture for group
A Streptococcus.[22]

The common investigations relevant to the evaluation of immune complex-mediated diseases are summarized below:

Blood

CBC with a differential count, complete metabolic panel

Peripheral blood smear

ESR, CRP

Complement levels

Quantitative serum immunoglobulins - IgG and IgM

Hepatitis serology and serum cryoglobulins

Antibody testing - ANA, anti-ds DNA, rheumatoid factor, anti-histones, anti-Smith, anti-(SS-A), anti-(SS-B), anti-RBC, antiplatelet, and
anti-neutrophil antibodies

Streptozyme test (measures five streptococcal antibodies) - antistreptolysin (ASO), antinicotinamide-adenine dinucleotidase (anti-NAD),
antihyaluronidase (AHase), antistreptokinase (ASKase), anti-DNAse B antibodies

Urine

Urinalysis with microscopy

 Urine spot protein/creatinine (PC) ratio

24 -hour urine protein

Imaging Studies

X-ray

CT scan

Allergic Skin Testing

Skin prick tests are performed using various allergens from animals, food, plants, pathogens, and environmental pollutants.

Special Procedures

Skin biopsy

Renal biopsy

Bronchoscopy

Cultures

Blood cultures

Skin culture

Throat culture

Treatment / Management
Type III hypersensitivity reaction can be treated based on the clinical presentation:

Removal of the offending agent is the mainstay of treatment of type III hypersensitivity reaction.[23]

Antihistamines and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can provide symptomatic relief.[24]

Corticosteroids are used in severe cases to suppress inflammation. They are also used as premedication to prevent hypersensitivity from
happening.[25]
 Avoiding exposure to an allergen is critical to the management of HP. In addition, corticosteroids are helpful in patients with inflammatory
features.

SLE is treated based on the individual patient's disease condition. Hydroxychloroquine is essential for long-term treatment in all SLE
patients.[26] Antimalarials, corticosteroids, nonbiologic DMARDS, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and biologic DMARDs are other
medications used to treat SLE.

The patient must be hospitalized in cases of hemodynamic instability, life-threatening symptoms, or unclear diagnosis.

Many infectious and autoimmune diseases are linked to type III hypersensitivity reactions. A consultation with the rheumatologist,
immunologist, and infectious disease specialist must be considered.

Treatment of autoimmune disorders (e.g., SLE) includes one or a combination of hydroxychloroquine, NSAIDs, azathioprine,
cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus.[27]

Differential Diagnosis
Type I and II hypersensitivity reactions are antibody-mediated similar to type III hypersensitivity. Their clinical features can overlap.

Type I or immediate hypersensitivity is mediated by preformed IgE antibodies that coat mast cells. The IgE antibodies are crosslinked by the free
allergen (antigen), leading to mast cell degranulation and the release of histamine and inflammatory mediators. Examples of type I
hypersensitivity mediated conditions are:

Anaphylaxis

Bronchial asthma

Allergic rhinitis

Food allergies

Type II hypersensitivity is mediated by IgG and IgM antibodies that coat (opsonize) the circulating cells (platelets, erythrocytes) with or without
complement. With opsonization, the cells become the target for phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils or complement-mediated lysis. In
other cases, the anti-receptor antibodies interfere with the normal function of the receptor (e.g., anti-acetylcholine receptor). Examples of type
II hypersensitivity mediated conditions are:

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura

 Acute rheumatic fever

Good pasture syndrome

Myasthenia gravis

Graves disease

Pernicious anemia

ANCA vasculitis

Prognosis
The prognosis of type III hypersensitivity reaction depends on the disease and the underlying comorbidities. Serum sickness has an excellent
prognosis. The symptoms usually resolve 1 to 2 weeks after the withdrawal of the offending agent. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis can have long-
term morbidity with progressive symptoms. Poor prognostic indicators include prolonged or a higher intensity of exposure, older age, digital
clubbing, and fibrotic changes in the lung.[15] Autoimmune diseases, e.g., SLE, are frequently associated with complications such as
hypertension, renal failure, and infections. 40% to 75% of patients with SLE develop lupus nephritis; 10% progress to ESRD.[28][29] The 5, 10,
and 15-year survival rates are near the 96, 93, and 76% range, respectively.[30]

Complications
Some of the complications associated with type III hypersensitivity reaction include:

Serum Sickness

Vasculitis

Acute kidney injury, glomerulonephritis

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Alveolitis

Pulmonary fibrosis/restrictive lung disease

Cor pulmonale

SLE
 Hypertension

Infections

Thrombosis

Glomerulonephritis, end-stage renal disease

Miscarriage

Post-streptococcal Glomerulonephritis

Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis

Chronic kidney disease

Proteinuria

Hypertension

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients should avoid exposure to the antigen that may be associated with a hypersensitivity reaction. In cases of an occupational hazard,
appropriate precautions at the worksite or changing the nature of the work must be considered. Medication-associated reactions can be avoided by
a careful review of the drug allergy list and related side-effect. The patients must familiarize themselves with the brand and generic name of the
offending medication. Medications with similar compositions should also be avoided to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. It is vital to emphasize
that repeated exposure to the triggering agent can lead to worsening disease.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Type III hypersensitivity reactions can be associated with medications, autoimmune, or infectious conditions. Further, it can involve multiple
organ systems that may require expertise from various specialties. It is vital to have interprofessional communication and care coordination by
physicians, mid-level practitioners (NPs and PAs), nurses, pharmacists, and dieticians for the best clinical outcomes. Many patients suffering from
autoimmune illnesses are on corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants; therefore, community clinicians, pharmacists, and other ancillary
staff become crucial in monitoring patients for short-term and long-term adverse effects.

Review Questions

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

 Comment on this article.

References
1. Uzzaman A, Cho SH. Chapter 28: Classification of hypersensitivity reactions. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 May-Jun;33 Suppl 1:96-99.
[PubMed: 22794701]
2. Fan H, Zhang S, Li N, Fan P, Hu X, Liang K, Cheng X, Wu Y. Stable expression ratios of five pyroptosis-inducing cytokines in the spleen and
thymus of mice showed potential immune regulation at the organ level. Lupus. 2020 Mar;29(3):290-302. [PubMed: 32041506]
3. Finger E, Scheinberg M. Development of serum sickness-like symptoms after rituximab infusion in two patients with severe
hypergammaglobulinemia. J Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;13(2):94-5. [PubMed: 17414540]
4. Fernando DM, Kaluarachchi CI, Ratnatunga CN. Necrotizing fasciitis and death following an insect bite. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2013
Sep;34(3):234-6. [PubMed: 23921771]
5. Patterson-Fortin J, Harris CM, Niranjan-Azadi A, Melia M. Serum sickness-like reaction after the treatment of cellulitis with
amoxicillin/clavulanate. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Oct 18;2016 [PMC free article: PMC5073577] [PubMed: 27756758]
6. Rhee C, Kadri SS, Dekker JP, Danner RL, Chen HC, Fram D, Zhang F, Wang R, Klompas M., CDC Prevention Epicenters Program.
Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens in Culture-Proven Sepsis and Outcomes Associated With Inadequate and Broad-Spectrum
Empiric Antibiotic Use. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 01;3(4):e202899. [PMC free article: PMC7163409] [PubMed: 32297949]
7. Schaeffer TH, Khatri V, Reifler LM, Lavonas EJ. Incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reaction and serum sickness following
administration of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab antivenom: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):121-31. [PubMed:
22320362]
8. Suwansrinon K, Jaijareonsup W, Wilde H, Benjavongkulchai M, Sriaroon C, Sitprija V. Sex- and age-related differences in rabies
immunoglobulin hypersensitivity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Feb;101(2):206-8. [PubMed: 16806332]
9. Vial T, Pont J, Pham E, Rabilloud M, Descotes J. Cefaclor-associated serum sickness-like disease: eight cases and review of the literature.
Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):910-4. [PubMed: 1504397]
10. Erffmeyer JE. Serum sickness. Ann Allergy. 1986 Feb;56(2):105-9. [PubMed: 3511779]
11. Hsiao YP, Tsai JD, Muo CH, Tsai CH, Sung FC, Liao YT, Chang YJ, Yang JH. Atopic diseases and systemic lupus erythematosus: an
epidemiological study of the risks and correlations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 08;11(8):8112-22. [PMC free article:
PMC4143852] [PubMed: 25111878]
12. Beickert Z. [Classification, diagnosis, and therapy of immunological aspects of disease according to reaction types]. Z Gesamte Inn Med.
1975 Sep 15;30(18):589-95. [PubMed: 129967]
13. Ryan NM, Downes MA, Isbister GK. Clinical features of serum sickness after Australian snake antivenom. Toxicon. 2015 Dec 15;108:181-
3. [PubMed: 26525657]
14. Watts MM, Grammer LC. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Nov 01;40(6):425-428. [PubMed: 31690386]
15.
Riario Sforza GG, Marinou A. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a complex lung disease. Clin Mol Allergy. 2017;15:6. [PMC free article:
PMC5339989] [PubMed: 28286422]
16. Hisauchi-Kojima K, Sumi Y, Miyashita Y, Miyake S, Toyoda H, Kurup VP, Yoshizawa Y. Purification of the antigenic components of pigeon
dropping extract, the responsible agent for cellular immunity in pigeon breeder's disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jun;103(6):1158-65.
[PubMed: 10359900]
17. Spagnolo P, Rossi G, Cavazza A, Bonifazi M, Paladini I, Bonella F, Sverzellati N, Costabel U. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A
Comprehensive Review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(4):237-50; quiz follow 250. [PubMed: 26310038]
18. Maidhof W, Hilas O. Lupus: an overview of the disease and management options. P T. 2012 Apr;37(4):240-9. [PMC free article:
PMC3351863] [PubMed: 22593636]
19. Sharmin M, Chowdhury AM, Ali MA, Rahman MW, Hossain MA, Rahman MH, Sharmin P, Roy AS, Chowdhury B. Clinical Profile and
Immediate Outcome of Children Admitted With Acute Glomerulonephritis in Pediatrics Department of A Tertiary Level Hospital.
Mymensingh Med J. 2020 Jan;29(1):5-15. [PubMed: 31915329]
20. Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, Brown KK, Costabel U, du Bois RM, Drent M, Haslam PL, Kim DS, Nagai S, Rottoli P, Saltini C,
Selman M, Strange C, Wood B., American Thoracic Society Committee on BAL in Interstitial Lung Disease. An official American Thoracic
Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med. 2012 May 01;185(9):1004-14. [PubMed: 22550210]
21. Blyth CC, Robertson PW, Rosenberg AR. Post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis in Sydney: a 16-year retrospective review. J Paediatr Child
Health. 2007 Jun;43(6):446-50. [PubMed: 17535174]
22. Shank JC, Powell TA. A five-year experience with throat cultures. J Fam Pract. 1984 Jun;18(6):857-63. [PubMed: 6374013]
23. Iordache AM, Docea AO, Buga AM, Mitrut R, Albulescu D, Zlatian O, Ianosi S, Ianosi G, Neagoe D, Sifaki M, Rogoveanu OC, Branisteanu
DE, Calina D. The incidence of skin lesions in contrast media-induced chemical hypersensitivity. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Feb;17(2):1113-1124.
[PMC free article: PMC6327547] [PubMed: 30679982]
24. Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Gomes E, Cernadas JR, du Toit G, Kidon M, Kuyucu S, Mori F, Ponvert C, Terreehorst I, Caubet JC. Diagnosis
and management of drug-induced anaphylaxis in children: An EAACI position paper. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 May;30(3):269-276.
[PubMed: 30734362]
25. Schopp JG, Iyer RS, Wang CL, Petscavage JM, Paladin AM, Bush WH, Dighe MK. Allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media:
premedication considerations for patients at risk. Emerg Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):299-306. [PubMed: 23430296]
26. Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;16(3):411-419.
[PubMed: 27927040]
27. Conti F, Ceccarelli F, Perricone C, Massaro L, Cipriano E, Pacucci VA, Truglia S, Miranda F, Morello F, Alessandri C, Spinelli FR, Valesini
G. Mycophenolate mofetil in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a retrospective study in a large monocentric cohort and review of
the literature. Immunol Res. 2014 Dec;60(2-3):270-6. [PubMed: 25468307]
28.
Sexton DJ, Reule S, Solid C, Chen SC, Collins AJ, Foley RN. ESRD from lupus nephritis in the United States, 1995-2010. Clin J Am Soc
Nephrol. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):251-9. [PMC free article: PMC4317731] [PubMed: 25534208]
29. Alarcón GS. Multiethnic lupus cohorts: what have they taught us? Reumatol Clin. 2011 Jan-Feb;7(1):3-6. [PubMed: 21794772]
30. Fors Nieves CE, Izmirly PM. Mortality in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: an Updated Review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016 Apr;18(4):21.
[PubMed: 26984805]
Disclosure: Norina Usman declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Pavan Annamaraju declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work, provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article,
provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK559122 PMID: 32644548