Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of global development, the effective localiza-
tion and management of socio-community infrastructure in developing countries
stand as paramount challenges. These regions often grapple with limited re-
sources, diverse geographical terrains, and the imperative to uplift communities
through the provision of essential facilities. Geolocalization emerges as a pivotal
tool in addressing these challenges, offering a nuanced understanding of spa-
tial dynamics and resource distribution [6]. As the global community intensifies
efforts to achieve sustainable development goals, the need for precise, accessi-
ble, and user-friendly tools becomes increasingly evident. Traditional methods of
infrastructure mapping often fall short in capturing the dynamic nature of com-
munity needs, hindering targeted interventions and resource allocation [6]. This
paper presents a significant stride towards overcoming these challenges through
the introduction of an innovative web-based platform designed for the precise
⋆
This work is supported by the University of Parakou through the university’s com-
petitive funds.
2 M.A. Mousse and R. Djeri
The rest of our article is organized as follows. The second section presents
the data and the methodology. The third section presents the obtain results. We
also make some discussions about these results in this section. Finally, we end
the paper with a conclusion.
2.1 Data
The data collected concerns the commune of Djougou in Benin. Between the 9°
25’ and 10° North latitude and 1° 30’ to 2° 25’ East longitude, Djougou commune
finds itself some 450 km away from Cotonou which are economic capital of Benin
[1]. Spanning an area of approximately 3,966 km2, Djougou stands as one of the
municipalities in the Donga department, bordered to the North by Kouandé
and Péhunco, to the South by Bassila, and to the West by Ouaké and Copargo,
extending further to the East to Sinendé, N’Dali, and Tchaourou. Djougou com-
mune comprises twelve (12) districts, including a notable nine (09) rural districts.
Figure 1 eloquently illustrates the geographic positioning of Djougou commune.
During data collection, several types of data were collected:
– Data relating to the description of the study area which essentially concerns
the geographical, physical and human aspect are collected at the town hall
and at the National Institute of Statistics and Demography;
– The cartographic data which made it possible to produce the map of the
study area obtained at the National Institute of Geography and thanks to
field investigations;
– Data on the different types of infrastructure available in the Town Hall
database;
– Data on the spatial distribution of socio-community infrastructure in the
municipality of Djougou obtained from the competent city services;
– Geographic coordinates of homes and infrastructure obtained through col-
lection work carried out in the field.
data exchange between the server application (also serving as a web server) and
the Database Management System is facilitated through Java Database Connec-
tivity. Java Database Connectivity stands out as a widely utilized Java API for
efficient database access. Similarly, when it comes to data exchange between the
data server and the geographical server, the Java Database Connectivity API is
also employed. The database used is a relational database with its spatial exten-
sion. The relational schema of our database is as follows.
In these relations, Geom Infrastructure and Geom Land are spatial attributs.
These attributes allow you to manipulate information relating to Longitude and
Latitude.
Furthermore, diverse clients seek services from the application server by issu-
ing queries based on the HTTP protocol. The Web server receives these HTTP
requests, which can necessitate either a static resource or a dynamic resource. In
the case of a static resource, the Web server promptly furnishes it. Conversely,
if an application requires a dynamic resource, such as a map image, the Web
server redirects the request to the application server, adept at handling Java
Server Pages and servlet codes. This process may involve consulting the data
source space. Upon the creation of the map, it is sent back to the application
server. Subsequently, the application server, operating on the Web server, trans-
forms the map into an HTML page. Significantly, the Web server possesses the
capability to interpret Java Server Pages, ultimately presenting the client with
the response in the form of a static page. This intricate yet streamlined architec-
ture ensures seamless communication and effective handling of both static and
dynamic resources in response to client requests.
Once finalized, our platform was deployed for testing. The figure 3 presents an
overview of proposed application. In this figure, we see the spatial distribution
information on both the state of the infrastructure and the plots.This informa-
tion obtained by clicking on the identified parts allows us, among other things,
to know the type of infrastructure and their condition. Figure 5 presents the
information about parcel whereas Figure 6 presents the information about the
socio-community infrastructures. This information allows decisions to be made
regarding the location of new infrastructure points based on the dynamics of the
evolution of the ground and the current state of the infrastructure.
4 Conclusion
References
2. Ian Babelon, Alexander Ståhle, and Berit Balfors. Toward cyborg ppgis: explor-
ing socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based ppgis in two municipal
planning cases, stockholm region, sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management, 60(8):1366–1390, 2017.
3. Amanda E Cravens. Negotiation and decision making with collaborative software:
how marinemap ‘changed the game’in california’s marine life protected act initia-
tive. Environmental Management, 57:474–497, 2016.
4. Ainhoa González Del Campo. Mapping environmental sensitivity: A systematic
online approach to support environmental assessment and planning. Environmental
Impact Assessment Review, 66:86–98, 2017.
5. Mordechai Haklay and Patrick Weber. Openstreetmap: User-generated street
maps. IEEE Pervasive computing, 7(4):12–18, 2008.
6. Ernest Amoussou Emilia M. Azalou Tingbé Mafobatchié Nantob Kpadédji Lam-
bert Ayitchéhou Henri Sourou Totin Vodounon, Koko Zébéto Houédakor and M. K.
Nabola-Bounou Enoumodji. Contributing to the achievement of sustainable de-
velopment goals: knowledge on water, sanitation and health risk in cotonou and
lomé cities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,
29(2):164–175, 2022.
7. Rob Kitchin. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and
their consequences. The Data Revolution, pages 1–240, 2014.
8. Asmaa Mourhir, Tajjeeddine Rachidi, Elpiniki I Papageorgiou, Mohammed Karim,
and Faycal Sossi Alaoui. A cognitive map framework to support integrated envi-
ronmental assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77:81–94, 2016.
9. Duncan A Smith. Online interactive thematic mapping: Applications and tech-
niques for socio-economic research. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,
57:106–117, 2016.
10. Bert Veenendaal, Maria Antonia Brovelli, and Songnian Li. Review of web
mapping: Eras, trends and directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-
Information, 6(10), 2017.