Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education
• Bachelor of Engineering (First Class Honours), University of Adelaide
• PhD, University of Adelaide
Experience
• Senior Research Engineer, Noise and Flow Control Group, United
Technologies Research Center (UTRC), East Hartford, Connecticut,
USA
– At the time: Pratt & Whitney, Sikorsky, Otis Elevator, Carrier, Hamilton
Standard, UT Automotive, UTC Power
• Senior Engineer, Vipac Engineers and Scientists Ltd
– Noise modelling, flight testing, acoustic testing
• Lecturer → Professor, University of Adelaide
– Research in novel acoustic materials
University of Adelaide 3
About the Course
• Comments about the “maths”.
• Vital to use example problems for learning.
• How SELTs are used to improve the course.
• Lifelong learners and adult learners.
• Learning resources.
• Recommended learning procedure.
• Expectations.
• Overview of the course content.
• Schedule of tasks.
• Assessment and late policy.
University of Adelaide 4
The “maths” – DON’T WORRY!
• Maths in the course is not hard…
about Year 11 / 12 standard.
• First, it is important to understand
the concepts.
Many concepts will be new, but they
are not hard to understand.
• Builds on topics in the course
Acoustics & Vibrations
• Once you understand the concepts,
the maths “makes sense”.
• Don’t fall into the mindset of
1. find formula
2. stuff numbers into equation
• Open book exam. Don’t need to
memorise formulas.
University of Adelaide 5
Example Problems and Answers
• There are over 250 example tutorial/practice problems
and fully worked answers available on MyUni.
• All exams and full solutions from 1996 - 2016
(13 years of example exams) are available on MyUni.
– The years that are missing are because it was not taught in that
year.
University of Adelaide 6
Lifelong Learning
• Graduate Attributes related to “Lifelong Learning”
– Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
• Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical,
creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative
responses to future challenges.
– Attribute 7: Digital capabilities
• Graduates are well prepared for living, learning and working in a
digital society.
– Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
• Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and
resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive
feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their
actions.
University of Adelaide 7
Lifelong Learners:
• Plan their own learning
• Assess their own learning
– students learn to take control of the crucial first step in learning;
finding out what it is they do not know. Peer and self assessment
assumes assessment is a skill that is vital for students to learn if
they are to monitor their learning in an ongoing way.
• Are active rather than passive learners
• Learn in both formal and informal settings
• Learn from their peers, teachers, mentors etc.
University of Adelaide 8
Learning Resources
There is a vast range of learning resources that you
should make use of throughout the course.
University of Adelaide 9
Learning Resources
Print Matter • Hundreds (!) of slides (notes only)
• The course is based on the textbook,
Lecture Notes
which has detailed explanations.
Textbooks Other textbooks that should be used as well!
• Hundreds (!!) of practice problems to
Practice Problems test your understanding of material.
(Not graded)
Do not just use the assignment as the
learning diagnostic tool.
There are questions asked in this course that are intentionally not answered in the notes.
This is to get you to do some research -- to develop your Graduate Attributes.
We are training you to be a PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
As an engineer you will be faced with this situation all the time.
University of Adelaide 10
Learning Resources
Digital • Need to watch the lecture recordings
BEFORE workshop sessions.
Video Recordings There are other videos that you
Internet References should watch as well.
Online reSearch Engines
• Online references listed in the notes
ENC Software
provide good explanations.
• Use search engines to find answers.
• ENC software in CATS has most of
the formulas – use to solve Q’s.
University of Adelaide 11
Learning Resources
Personal • Come to workshops and participate!
Be an ACTIVE learner,
Attend Workshops Ask questions about the videos,
Ask questions about the assignments,
Ask Colleagues
Get involved.
Discussion Board – Workshops run as Open Room – Open Zoom
– See Schedule in notes or MyUni
– Meeting ID: 889 4289 2704 Password: 980399
• Ask your colleagues questions.
• Post questions on the discussion board
that your colleagues should answer.
I will also contribute.
(Email me directly if of personal nature)
University of Adelaide 12
Learning Resources
• Recommended learning process.
Lecture Notes
Video Recordings
Textbooks
University of Adelaide 13
Quotes – SELT Comment from 2018
• “Assessment method: While I'm a fan of Mobius and the tailored worked
solutions are incredibly good. It would be great if we can't have a "how did I
go" for the answers simply being given a grade at the end of the quiz for the
full marks. I thought I did everything correct in one assignment and ended
up doing horribly. It can be a quite demotivating. If I'm told I get say 1/9 the
day after it doesn't change it. If I saw that I did that poorly I could've gone
through the material again and tried again earlier.”
Important point here:
There are hundreds of Q&As available on MyUni that are non-graded questions,
that YOU ARE EXPECTED TO USE as part of your learning.
If you want to do more non-graded tests, do more practice questions!
University of Adelaide 14
Learning Resources
• Recommended learning process.
Lecture Notes
Video Recordings
Textbooks
University of Adelaide 15
Laboratory Practical
• Measurement of acoustic absorption
coefficient using T60 and substitution
methods in acoustic reverberation
chamber.
• 10% of course grade.
• Group lab to obtain measurements, with
individual submission of results and
analysis.
• No formal lab “report”.
Just need to submit numerical values and
answer a couple of questions.
• Due 7 days after practical session.
• Located Ground Floor Engineering South
in Acoustics and Vibration Laboratory
Room SG04
University of Adelaide 16
Teamwork
• Needed in Laboratory Practical
– Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
• Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of
audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive
and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
University of Adelaide 17
Distance Learning (External) – Laboratory
Practical Alternative
• Acoustics tutorial / assignment
As you can’t attend the acoustic chambers
University of Adelaide 18
Learning Resources for the Course
• MyUni – starting point.
• Course Notes – they are notes, NOT a textbook.
• Lecture Recordings – previous lectures should be watched before
workshops.
• Workshops – chance to ask questions.
• Textbook – details about each concept.
• Reference Materials – still confused? Read another book.
• Practice Problems and Solutions – these should be revised to
understand the material.
• Discussion Board – Get help from colleagues and me.
• Mobius Assignments – Another learning diagnostic tool.
– Tests your understanding of the concepts. If you get a question wrong, look
through the worked solutions and revise the material.
– Low weighting towards overall grades.
– This course is training you to be a professional engineer - you don’t get part
marks for getting an answer wrong.
University of Adelaide 19
Resources
Books
Bies, D.A., Hansen, C.H., Howard, C.Q., and Hansen, K.L.,
Engineering Noise Control, 6th edition, CRC Press, London,
(2023).
Bies, D.A., Hansen, C.H., and Howard, C.Q., Engineering Noise
Control, 5th edition, CRC Press, London, (2017). [Reference
edition for Course Notes]
Hansen, C.H. Noise Control: From Concept to Application
(2005).
Frank J. Fahy, “Foundations of Engineering Acoustics.”
L.E. Kinsler et. al. 3rd edn. "Fundamentals of acoustics"
M. P. Norton, D. G. Karczub, "Fundamentals of noise and
vibration analysis for engineers.”
H. Fastl and E. Zwicker, “Psychoacoustics Facts and Models”,
Springer, 3rd Ed 2007. (free ebook from BSL)
University of Adelaide 20
Resources
Internet
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/waves-
sound/sound/index.html
http://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/acoustic_IOI/101home.htm
http://psysound.org/
http://audacity.sourceforge.net
http://www.psysound.org/ (Psysound and AARAE: Audio and
Acoustical Response Analysis Environment)
University of Adelaide 21
Resources
iPhone Android
RTA Audio RTA Pro Analyzer
iAnalyzer Lite AudioTool
Decibel 10th Speedy Spectrum Analyzer
SGenerator Lite FrequenSee - Spectrum
Toolbox acousticassist Analyzer
Faber Acoustics (best one Spectrum Analyzer
but expensive) Audalyzer
Spectrum View – Oxford Noise Meter
Wave Research
University of Adelaide 22
Resources
Free Online Courses in Acoustics
• Acoustics of Speech and Hearing, MIT
– http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-
computer-science/6-551j-acoustics-of-speech-and-hearing-fall-
2004/
• Advanced Structural Dynamics and Acoustics, MIT
– http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mechanical-engineering/2-067-
advanced-structural-dynamics-and-acoustics-13-811-spring-
2004/
• Introduction to Acoustics (Part 1 & 2), Korea Advanced
Institute of Science and Technology
– https://www.coursera.org/course/acoustics1
– https://www.coursera.org/course/acoustics2
University of Adelaide 23
Expectations
• You should act as a Professional Engineer.
• You will have to read the notes AND search other references.
• I won’t go through the text on every slide. Why?
– Because students get bored from PowerPoint slides filled with text and
math Greek characters -- “Death by PowerPoint”
… a bit hard to escape this at times because there are a lot of concepts
and equations in this course.
– There is a lot to get through.
– It is often easier to digest material by reading by yourself.
… but PLEASE ask questions if something is confusing.
“I understand we have limited time to cover an entire course, but when going through
the slides I suggest giving a little bit more time to the ambiguous points only, I would
say 95% of the course don't require that and they are very easy to understand.
So rush through the slides. But keep an eye on the difficult parts.”
University of Adelaide 24
Course Content
• Goal is for our graduates to have a basic understanding of various
aspects of acoustics.
– The subject of acoustics is MASSIVE, and we can’t cover it all.
– Provide foundation knowledge.
• We are teaching you to be a PROFESSIONAL engineer.
– Provide knowledge to be an acoustic consultant.
– Learn and behave like a professional engineer.
• Learning is in YOUR hands.
• Always be professional. i.e., turn up on time, be prepared, get it right,
respectful of others, submit high-quality work, submit work on-time, …
• Graduate Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness
– Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to
be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen
occupations or careers and communities.
• Graduate Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
– Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their
subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought,
and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-
disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
University of Adelaide 25
Course Content
TOPIC
p
Basics t
Instrumentation
The Ear
16 Ve S A
No m
ry ho pli
Ra
rm
8 l ou ut fi e
is
al
ed
d dv
oi
Distance in metres
4 ce
Criteria
lim
Ex it
2 pe
ct
ed
Vo
1 ice
Le
ve
0.5 l
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dBre 20μ Pa)
University of Adelaide 26
Course Content
TOPIC
Psychoacoustics
positive θ
a pdipole
Sound Sources
d/2 r
d/2
negative
Sound Power
University of Adelaide 27
Course Content
TOPIC
y Sound Source
Indoor x
Receiver
Outdoor
University of Adelaide 28
Course Content
TOPIC
Enclosures and
Transmission
Loss of Panels
Barriers
Mufflers
University of Adelaide 29
Schedule 2024
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Jan 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Introduction Workshops
Lecture, (10-12pm,
Australia Day
Workshops 1-3pm)
Public Holiday
(10-12pm, + Quizzes 1,2,3
1-3pm) Due + Assign 1 Due
Feb 29 30 31 01 02 03 04
Workshops
Workshops
(10-12pm,
(10-12pm, Practice Exam
1-3pm)
Laboratory 1-3pm) Laboratory (10-12pm)
+ Quizzes
Practicals + Quiz 14 Due Practicals
11,12,13 Due
+ Assign 6 Due
+ Assign 5 Due
EXAM WEEK EXAM WEEK EXAM WEEK EXAM WEEK EXAM WEEK
Feb 12 13 14 15 16
17 18
Exam
Laboratory
(time and
Practicals
venue tbc)
University of Adelaide 30
Assessment Weights
Onsite External
Task Number %each %subtotal Number %each %subtotal
Quizzes 14 0.5 7 14 0.5 7
Assignments 6 3 18 6 3 18
Practice
1 5 5 1 5 5
Exam
Lab Practical 1 10 10 1 10 10
Final Exam 1 60 60 1 60 60
100 100
Final Exam HURDLE: must get at least 40% for exam.
https://www.adelaide.edu.au/learning/teaching/assessment/hurdle.html
University of Adelaide 31
Assignments – 3% each
Assessment task Weighting % Description Due date
Assignment on Chapter 1 in the text. Thursday
Assignment 1 3
Refer to Practice Problems 1 in MyUni. 25 January
Assignment on Chapters 2, 3 and 4 in
Monday
Assignment 2 3 the text. Refer to Practice Problems 2
29 January, 23:59
in MyUni.
Assignment on Chapters 5 and 6 in the
Wednesday
Assignment 3 3 text. Refer to Practice Problems 3 in
31 January, 23:59
MyUni.
Assignment on Chapter 7 in the text. Friday
Assignment 4 3
Refer to Practice Problems 4 in MyUni. 2 February, 23:59
Assignment on Chapter 8 in the text. Monday
Assignment 5 3
Refer to Practice Problems 5 in MyUni. 5 February, 23:59
Assignment on Chapter 9 in the text. Wednesday
Assignment 6 3
Refer to Practice Problems 5 in MyUni. 7 February, 23:59
University of Adelaide 32
Quizzes – 0.5% each
Topic and Description Due Date
Topic 01 Course Overview Wed 24 Jan at 23:59
Topic 02 Fundamentals of Acoustics Wed 24 Jan at 23:59
Topic 03 General Noise Control Wed 24 Jan at 23:59
Topic 04 Instrumentation Mon 29 Jan at 23:59
Topic 05 Human Hearing Mon 29 Jan at 23:59
Topic 06 Noise Criteria Mon 29 Jan at 23:59
Topic 07 Psychoacoustics Wed 31 Jan at 23:59
Topic 08 Sound Sources Wed 31 Jan at 23:59
Topic 09 Sound Power Fri 2 Feb at 23:59
Topic 10 Indoor Sound Fri 2 Feb at 23:59
Topic 11 Outdoor Sound Propagation Mon 5 Feb at 23:59
Topic 12 Acoustic Enclosures and TL of Panels Mon 5 Feb at 23:59
Topic 13 Barriers and Pipe Lagging Mon 5 Feb at 23:59
Topic 14 Mufflers Wed 7 Feb at 23:59
University of Adelaide 33
Extensions and Late Penalties
• ALL assignments and quizzes must be submitted electronically
through MyUni.
No paper assignments are accepted.
• It is not possible to submit assignments, quizzes and prac reports
after the due date unless an extension has been arranged with the
Course Coordinator.
• The answers to assignments and quizzes are released shortly after
the deadline.
• Extensions are only granted on medical, compassionate or
other special circumstances recognised under the
University’s Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
Policy (see https://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/3303/)
• New online Application for Assessment Extension form that replaces
the previous one at
https://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/assessment-
applications/assessment-extension
• Any doubts about extensions, please contact the Course Coordinator
Anthony Zander at anthony.zander@adelaide.edu.au. Please submit
your online application before the assessment due date.
University of Adelaide 34
Practice Exam
• Practice exam (open book) worth 5% of course.
• WHEN: Friday 9 February 2024, 10am – 12pm
(usual timeslot)
• WHERE: Barr Smith Sth 2040 / online (external)
• WHAT IS IN IT: multiple choice questions from a
previous exam.
• WHY:
– Assess your current understanding of the course, so you can
determine if you will meet the hurdle requirement for
final exam, and gives you time to do something about it.
– Ensures students remain engaged throughout course, so
(hopefully) grade distribution will be higher.
University of Adelaide 35
Final Exam
• 60% of course grade
– HURDLE: must get at least 40% for exam grade to be
considered for passing course and to be eligible for an
Additional Assessment.
– Format: 3 hours. About 50% MCQ, 50% long answer – where
you have to derive something, a longer more complicated
problem, design something.
– Open book. The questions are new and often unlike anything you
have seen before.
Hence, a mindset of copying formulas and putting in numbers
WILL NOT WORK. You have to understand the material.
• WHEN: Sometime in exam week. I don’t know the exact
date.
– Estimate: Friday 16th Feb or Saturday 17th Feb.
University of Adelaide 36
Subscribe to MyUni Discussion Boards
University of Adelaide 37
Fundamentals of Acoustics
Introduction
To start off, we need to talk about some basics:
University of Adelaide 3
Contents
• Amplitude, frequency, wavelength
• Speed of sound
• Impedance
• Wave equation
• Plane waves, spherically spreading waves
• Resonance
• Octave bands
• Sound pressure level
• Sound intensity and sound power
• Addition and subtraction of dBs
• Directivity and reflection effects
• Flow resistivity and absorption
University of Adelaide 4
Learning Outcomes
• Understand some basic terminology used in acoustics.
• Be able to calculate frequency, wavelength, speed of
sound.
• Understand resonance
• Good understanding of octave bands.
• Be able to calculate sound pressure level, add and
subtract SPLs, NRs.
• Basic understanding of sound intensity and sound power
• Understand how reflecting planes alter SPL from a
radiating source.
• Understanding of flow resistivity and absorption.
eSELT Question: “This Course has clearly identified learning outcomes.”
‐> Learning outcomes are at start of every lecture and in the notes.
University of Adelaide 5
Frequency, Wavelength, Amplitude
• Acoustic pressure is longitudinal waves
University of Adelaide 7
Frequency, Wavelength, Amplitude
• Amplitude, frequency (pitch) and wavelength
If we plotted the
amplitude vs time …
University of Adelaide 8
Frequency, Wavelength, Amplitude
Amplitude, frequency (pitch) and wavelength
University of Adelaide 9
Harmonic Pressure
• Complex Pressure Amplitude
Period T
A Peak amplitude A
t
Peak to Peak amplitude
University of Adelaide 10
Harmonic Pressure
• YOU SHOULD LOOK AT THESE PAGES:
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/waves-
sound/sound/index.html
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/phasor-
addition.html
https://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos.html
University of Adelaide 11
Speed of Sound Relationship
c = speed of sound [m/s]
f = frequency [Hz]
= wavelength [m]
ENC5 p20
Pressure Wavelength 𝜆
Anti-Node
Distance
Node
Node
Example:
𝛾𝑅𝑇 1.402 8.314 273.15 22
Air at 22°C -> 𝑐 344 m/s
𝑀 0.029
University of Adelaide 13
Speed of Sound
• Mach 1.0 = speed of sound at the location.
M=1 M=25
• Inhaling
– Helium: makes your voice higher pitch.
– Sulfur hexafluoride: makes your voice deeper.
– https://youtu.be/EA9QU0rdb9k
University of Adelaide 14
Speed of sound in solids
• In solids it is the speed of propagation of longitudinal
waves not bending waves
• Speed is independent of frequency
𝑐 𝐷 ⁄𝜌 for liquids
𝐷 = bulk modulus of the fluid
𝐸 = Young’s modulus
𝑐 𝐸 ⁄𝜌 for solid rod 𝜌 = density
𝜈 = Poission’s ratio
𝐸
𝑐 for thin panel
𝜌 1 𝜈
ENC5 p13‐15
University of Adelaide 15
Wavenumber k
• Another term that is often used in acoustics is
WAVENUMBER k (don’t get confused with stiffness)
k = wavenumber in 1/m
𝜔 = circular frequency in radians / s
𝑐 = speed of sound in m/s
𝑓 = frequency in Hz
ENC5 p20
University of Adelaide 16
Demonstration of Wavelength of Sound
• Distance between ears = about 20cm
• Corresponds to a frequency of =344/0.2=1720 Hz
So if we play a sound at about 1700 Hz,
move your head around very slowly….
You should notice that the sound level gets
louder and quieter.
Pressure “nodes” 𝜆
= zero pressure
2.
University of Adelaide 17
Density of a Gas
• Using the gas law
University of Adelaide 18
Acoustic Field Variables
• Sound sensed by the ear is
due to VERY small pressure
Pressure : P tot = P + p(r, t)
fluctuations.
• The expressions for
Velocity : U tot = U + u(r, t)
pressure, particle velocity,
temperature and density can
be written in terms of steady Temperature : T tot = T + ( r, t)
state (mean) values, and the
perturbation. Density : tot = + ( r, t)
ENC5 p11
University of Adelaide 19
Acoustic Field Variables
• Pressure, Temperature, Density should be familiar.
• Particle velocity requires further discussion.
• Think of a “particle” as a small bit of the medium.
• Usually an oscillating velocity – not a mean flow.
• Consider a small parcel of air adjacent to a vibrating
panel.
Vibrating Plate
University of Adelaide 20
Wave Equation
• Acoustic propagation is mathematically described by the
wave equation
ENC5 p17
University of Adelaide 21
Wave Equation
• Often written in terms of the
acoustic potential function
as
1 2
2 = 2
c t2
where
Particle velocity is the negative
u = φ gradient of the potential function.
University of Adelaide 22
Plane and Spherical Spreading Waves
• Sound wave propagation is complicated.
• It can often be described as propagating as
University of Adelaide 23
Plane and Spherical Spreading Waves
• Consider a sound source that generates spherically
spreading waves.
Close to the source the
wavefront is curved
Force on a spring 𝑓 𝑘𝑥
Stiffness 𝑘
University of Adelaide 26
Impedance
• Spring • Plane Wave
𝑓 𝑘
𝑍 p
𝑣 𝑗𝜔 =c
u ENC5 p18
University of Adelaide 27
Other Types of Impedances ENC5 p45
Mechanical Impedance
𝐹 𝑝𝐴
𝑍
𝑢 𝑢
Used to describe sound radiation from a vibrating
structure.
University of Adelaide 28
Other Types of Impedances ENC5 p45
Acoustic Impedance
𝑝 𝑝
𝑍
𝑈𝐴 𝑣
University of Adelaide 29
Spherical Wave Solution to Wave Eqn
ENC5 p22
• For a harmonic solution
𝜕𝜙 𝑗 𝜔𝐴 𝜌
• Pressure is 𝑝 𝜌 𝑒
𝜕𝑡 𝑟
𝐴 𝑗 𝑘𝐴
• Velocity is 𝑢 𝛻𝜙 𝑒 𝑒
𝑟 𝑟
𝑝 𝑗 𝑘𝑟
• Impedance is 𝜌𝑐
𝑢 1 𝑗𝑘𝑟
University of Adelaide 30
Spherical Wave Solution to Wave Eqn
ENC5 p29 1 𝑗𝑘𝑟
• Multiply previous equation by 1 𝑗𝑘𝑟
gives 𝑝 𝑘𝑟 𝑘𝑟 𝑗
𝜌𝑐
𝑢 1 𝑘 𝑟
which can be re-written as 𝑝
𝜌𝑐𝑒 cos 𝛽
𝑢
𝛽
𝑘𝑟
University of Adelaide 31
Spherical Wave Solution to Wave Eqn
• So from these previous equations 𝑝
we said that 𝜌𝑐𝑒 cos 𝛽
where 𝛽 𝑢
𝜃 𝜃
𝜃 = phase angle of pressure
𝜃 = phase angle of velocity
p
• We said that for a plane wave =c
u
University of Adelaide 32
Why is impedance an important concept?
University of Adelaide 33
Hearing Aids
• “Super Power Behind-The-Ear
Hearing Instruments
- Sound pressure level (SPL) output
typically over 135dB” (!!!)
• A “Sound Garden” concert might be http://www.knowles.com/eng/Applications/
around 120 dB up close. Specialty‐components/Hearing‐aid‐
components#Behind‐the‐ear
University of Adelaide 34
Impedance of the ear
• An example you can relate to... earbud headphones
• Ever noticed you that the sound is different depending
on how you insert the earbuds ?
University of Adelaide 35
Impedance of the ear
Simulator with a standardised impedance of a human ear.
University of Adelaide 36
Resonance / Natural Frequencies
• organ pipe resonances (duct diameter d, length L)
• bends not seen by waves for f < 0.5 c/d
closed both ends | open both ends | closed one end
nc f = frequency (Hz)
2n 1c
f n = mode index 1, 2, 3, … f
2L c = speed of sound (m/s) 4L
L = length of pipe (m)
University of Adelaide 37
Resonance / Natural Frequencies
• Previous slide was for a 1D system.
• Similarly for a 3D system - Acoustic Modes of a Room
also has resonance frequencies and modes … see later
topic
y Sound Source
Receiver
University of Adelaide 38
Acoustic pressure is longitudinal waves
• Consider a moving piston Equivalent pressure
University of Adelaide 39
1.5
Addition
Amplitude [Volts]
1
0.5
0
-0.5 0 5 10 15
• Example of adding -1
Amplitude [Volts]
0.2
-0.2 0 5 10 15
-0.4
Time [s]
2 =
Amplitude [Volts]
1
0
0 5 10 15
-1
-2
Time [s]
University of Adelaide 40
Addition in Time & Frequency Domains
1.5
Amplitude [Volts]
1.20
Amplitude [Volts]
1 1.00
0.5 0.80
0 0.60
-0.5 0 5 10 15 0.40
-1 0.20
0.00
-1.5
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00
Time [s]
Frequency [Hz]
+ +
0.4
0.4
Amplitude [Volts]
Amplitude [Volts]
0.2 0.3
0 0.2
-0.2 0 5 10 15 0.1
-0.4 0
-0.10.00 10.00 20.00 30.00
Time [s]
Frequency [Hz]
2
= 1.2
=
Amplitude [Volts]
Amplitude [Volts]
1
1
0.8
0 0.6
0.4
0 5 10 15
-1 0.2
0
-2 -0.20.00 10.00 20.00 30.00
Time [s] Frequency [Hz]
University of Adelaide 41
Spectral Analysis
• Time Domain Frequency Domain
ENC p42
University of Adelaide 42
Standard Noise Types
• There are some standard noise test signals used in
Psychoacoustics.
– Pure tone, beats, amplitude-modulated tone, tone pulse, DC
pulse, frequency-modulated tone, tone burst, white noise, band-
pass noise, narrow-band noise, Gaussian DC impulse, Gaussian-
shaped tone burst.
• The time functions and associated frequency spectra can
be seen in the following figure.
University of Adelaide 43
University of Adelaide 44
Logarithmic Frequency Scale
1
frequency range:
Amplitude
0.6
represented on a 0.8
logarithmic scale.
Amplitude
0.6
0 1 2 3 4 5
10 10 10 10 10
Frequency [Hz]
University of Adelaide 45
Octave Bands
1
0.8
Amplitude
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
4
x 10
Notice equal width
1
• Octave Bands have equal 0.8
widths on log-frequency
Amplitude
0.6
scale. 0.4
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 5
10 10 10 10 10
Frequency [Hz]
University of Adelaide 46
ENC4 p44, ENC5 p43
Band centre centre Lower Upper
ID (integer) 32
33 2 000
1 600
2 000
1 414
1 760
1 760
2 250
34 2 500 2 250 2 825
– take 10 log10 of band centre 35 3 150 2 825 3 530
36 4 000 4 000 3 530 4 400
frequency and round off. 37 5 000 4 400 5 650
38 6 300 5 650 7 070
– E.g. 10 log10 (250)=23.979 39 8 000 8 000 7 070 8 800
40 10 000 8 800 11 300
41 12 500 11 300 14 140
42 16 000 16 000 14 140 17 600
43 20 000 17 600 22 500
University of Adelaide 47
Octave Bands
20 100 88 113
21 125 125 113 141
22 160 141 176
2x
23 200 176 225
24 250 250 225 283
25 315 283 353
University of Adelaide 48
One-Third Octave Bands
20 100 88 113
21 125 125 113 141
22 160 141 176
23 200 176 225
24 250 250 225 283
25 315 283 353
University of Adelaide 49
Octave Bands
20 100 88 113
21 125 125 113 141
22 160 141 176
23 200 176 225
24 250 250 225 283
25 315 283 353
University of Adelaide 50
Octave Bands
• Consider 250 Hz octave band (i.e. frequency range),
its 3x one-third octave bands,
and the limits for each frequency band
176, 200, 225, 250, 283, 315, 353 176, 200, 225, 250, 283, 315, 353
University of Adelaide 52
Octave Bands
250 Hz OCTAVE band is defined by the centre frequency
(i.e. 250 Hz), comprises 3x one-third octave bands, and has
lower and upper frequency limits of 176 Hz and 353 Hz.
University of Adelaide 53
Octave Bands
Note, the frequency band limits, are not actually sharp;
actually defined as filters that have “roll-offs”, so a small
amount of energy outside the band will get added into band
of interest.
University of Adelaide
19 80 71 88
20 100 88 113
21 125 125 113 141
22 160 141 176
56
ENC4 p44, ENC5 p43
University of Adelaide
42 16000 16000 14140 17600
43 20000 17600 22500
Octave and 1/3-Octave Bands
• So THREE 1/3-octave bands comprise an octave band.
University of Adelaide 57
Example: Octave Bands
Pink Noise
When analysed in octave bands,
it has a flat spectrum, which is
why it is often used in acoustics.
White Noise
When analysed in octave bands,
it has an increasing spectrum of
3 dB per octave.
When viewed using 1 Hz
frequency spacing, it will have a
flat spectrum.
University of Adelaide 58
Application: Filters
• Demonstration - Graphic Equaliser on
Windows Media Player
University of Adelaide 62
Sound Pressure
• Sound pressure, p
– VERY small fraction of atmospheric pressure (101325Pa).
• e.g. speech about 60dB re 20Pa = 0.02 Pa (RMS),
factor of 101325/0.02= 5 × 106
– varies cyclically.
pref
where pRMS = RMS acoustic pressure
pref = reference pressure = 20 × 10-6 Pa.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel ENC5 p31
University of Adelaide 64
What does RMS mean?
• The mean square value of the pressure is defined by
ENC5 p25
→
p peak A
• For harmonic pressure prms
2 2
University of Adelaide 65
Sound Pressure Level (dB)
• From previous slides, we define sound pressure level in
decibels, which is defined as
2
p1 p1
SPL L p 10 log10 20 log10
pref pref
and values are shown followed by dB re something,
e.g., 50 dB re 20 Pa
University of Adelaide 66
Range of Hearing in Humans
University of Adelaide 67
ENC5 p32
University of Adelaide 68
Subjective Assessment of Change in SPL
University of Adelaide 72
Amplitude Descriptors
• Consider a harmonic function for pressure, say
𝑝 𝑡 𝐴 sin 𝜔 𝑡 𝜙
where
𝐴 = magnitude of the pressure (Pascals)
𝜔 = circular frequency (radians / s) remember 𝜔 2𝜋𝑓
𝑡 = time
𝜙= phase angle shift (radians)
University of Adelaide 73
Amplitude Descriptors
• Note: these relationships only apply for harmonic
pressure!
• Do not use them for other signal types
University of Adelaide 74
Amplitude Descriptors
• ARMS is the root mean square value (RMS) defined by:
T
1 2
ARMS x (t )dt
T0
A peak 1.414 A RMS 1.57 A average
A peak - to - peak 2 A peak
A average 0.9 A RMS 0.637 A peak
A RMS 0.707 A peak 1.11 A average
Peak to peak 2A
University of Adelaide 75
Amplitude Descriptors
University of Adelaide 76
Addition and Subtraction
• Addition of noise levels
– Two coherent sources
(tonal noise sources of the same frequency)
the phase angle must be taken into account.
ENC5 p33
so 𝑝 𝑝
University of Adelaide 79
Addition and Subtraction
Example: Two identical speakers generate a pure tone
signal, each producing 85dB re 20Pa at a microphone.
University of Adelaide 80
Addition and Subtraction
a) phase angle = 180 degrees
This technique is used in Active Noise Control (cancellation)
University of Adelaide 81
ANC in Exhaust Stack
University of Adelaide 82
Addition and Subtraction
1
hence
Amplitude
0
-1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Time
𝑝 𝑝 𝑝 2 𝑝 𝑝 cos 𝛽 𝛽
𝑝 𝑝 2𝑝 0
2
𝑝RMS
𝐿 , total 10 log
2
𝑝ref
∞ dB re 20𝜇Pa
University of Adelaide 83
Addition and Subtraction
b) phase angle =0, hence cos 0 1
𝑝 𝑝
SPL 𝐿 20log 10log
𝑝 𝑝
⁄
𝑝 , 𝑝 , 𝑝 10
𝑝 𝑝 𝑝 2 𝑝 𝑝 cos 𝛽 𝛽
4𝑝 4 𝑝 10 ⁄
⁄
𝑝 4 𝑝 10
𝐿 , 10log 10log
𝑝 𝑝
𝐿 , 10log 4 85 6 91 dB re 20𝜇Pa
University of Adelaide 84
Addition and Subtraction
Addition of noise levels
– Incoherent sources (random, unrelated)
⁄ ⁄ ⁄
ENC5 p34
University of Adelaide 86
Addition and Subtraction
Example of addition of incoherent noise levels:
University of Adelaide 87
Addition and Substraction
Subtraction of SPLs
⁄ ⁄
ENC5 p36
University of Adelaide 90
Addition and Subtraction
Example of subtraction of SPLs :
⁄ ⁄
A: 𝐿 10 log 10 10 91.8 dB re 20μPa
University of Adelaide 91
Addition and Subtraction
• This subtraction maths is
Variation in SPL with Number of Sources
REALLY important and
60
deceptively misleading.
• In order to achieve an
overall Reduction in SPL 55
requires reduction of
ALL noise sources
• A 20dB reduction of 50
one of five sources, 5 4 3 2 1
might only mean an Number of Sources at 50dBA
overall reduction 1 dB.
University of Adelaide 92
Addition and Subtraction
Combining sound pressure level reductions
– used when sound can get to a receiver from a source along more
than one path. Each path has a noise attenuation associated with it
which is the reduction in level (in dB) over that for direct line-of-
sight propagation. Sometimes the overall reduction may be negative
(i.e. increases noise level).
• Overall Noise Reduction n
NR L pR L p 10log10 10 NR i 10
University of Adelaide 99
Addition and Subtraction
EXAMPLE:
Q: Sound propagates over the ground from a noisy diesel
engine to a residence 100m away. If the wave reflected
from the ground suffers an attenuation of 3dB, what is the
overall noise reduction at the residence over what it would
be if there were no ground reflected wave?
i1
⁄ ⁄
⁄ ⁄ ⁄
Psycho‐Acoustics
1 ⁄ ⁄ ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 𝑡 10 𝑡 10 . . . 𝑡 10
𝑇
𝑇 𝑡 𝑡 ... 𝑡 ENC5 p85
For example,
Q: What is the equivalent SPL over an 8-hour period?
Very important concept for quantifying noise emission and noise
exposure for people.
[ We’ll see a lot more on this when we get to the Noise Criteria section ]
University of Adelaide 108
Sound Power
Light Globe Analogy of Sound Power
• A 60W light globe always has the same power rating, but
the brightness of the light will depend on the distance
from the light source.
60W
Light Globe
The power of the light globe has remained the same, but the brightness has changed
depending on distance…. Same concept for acoustic power and acoustic pressure.
University of Adelaide 110
Acoustic Intensity
In order to calculate sound power, we need to know about
acoustic intensity
• defined as the product of pressure and particle velocity
and is thus a vector quantity
• real part (product of acoustic pressure, p and in phase
part of acoustic particle velocity, u) is a measure of the
energy of the disturbance
• can be used for source sound power measurements in
noisy environments
• identifies sources of sound (as it is a vector)
ENC p34
University of Adelaide 111
Acoustic Particle Velocity
• Right travelling wave
https://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/phase‐p‐u/phase‐p‐u.html
University of Adelaide 112
Acoustic Particle Velocity
• Standing
Wave
Im Im
Re Re
Im
Re
ENC p188
University of Adelaide 117
Acoustic Intensity
• Waves radiating from a source become planar at a great
distance (far field)
– In this case p and u are in-phase and
prms = root mean square pressure
= density of medium (kg/m3)
c = speed of sound (m/s) ENC5 p29
𝑊 𝐼 ⋅ 𝑛 𝑑𝐴
400
• In air at 20C L p Lw 10log10 4 r 2
Distance r
Measure
Sound Pressure Level
Lp
An imaginary surface
created by a frame
𝐿
𝐿
ENC5 p200
University of Adelaide 127
Directivity and Reflecting Surfaces
• Free Space • Centre large plane
𝐷 1 𝐷 2
DI 0 dB DI 3 dB
10 log 4 6
University of Adelaide 128
Reflection Effects
ENC5 p201
University of Adelaide 129
Directivity
• Directivity is defined in terms of the sound intensity
measured at an angle 𝐼 , divided by the
average intensity 𝐼
Directivity factor
where
• Directivity Index,
ENC5 p199
University of Adelaide 130
Baffled Piston
-20
o
-60 60o
-30
-40
-90o 90o
Directivity Pattern
Pressure Nulls
University of Adelaide 131
Directivity and Reflection Effects
• Directivity and reflection effects are related.
• Nearby surfaces will reflect sound and this changes the
effective directivity of the source.
• Don’t get confused between the two concepts.
the source can have directivity such that a nearby reflecting surface can change
it radiates sound better at a particular the radiated sound.
angle.
2 WcQ
prms
2
4r
University of Adelaide 133
Reflection Effects
• Divide by the appropriate reference values
2
prms 1 WcQ 1 1
2
pref Wref 4r 2 Wref pref
2
• Do a bit of a shuffle …
prms
2
Q W c Wref
2 2 2
pref 4r Wref
p ref
𝑄 𝜌𝑐 10
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 10 log
4𝜋 𝑟 20 10
ENC5 p204
This is a really important equation – highlight it
University of Adelaide 135
Reflection Effects
• For “normal” atmospheric conditions
𝜌 1.21 kg /m3 , 𝑐 343 m/s , so the last term
1.21 343
10 log 0.16 dB
400
and is often ignored.
• So what does all this mean ….
1 c
L p Lw DI 10 log10 10 log
2 400
4 r
Sound Sound
pressure power Directivity Distance Acoustic medium
level level from source
Directivity Distance r
Effects
DI Sound Power Level
Lw
Sound Pressure Level
Lp
1 c
Lw DI 10 log10 10 log Lp
2
400
4 r
⁄ ⁄ ⁄
𝐿 10 log 10 10 10 ...
University of Adelaide 138
Predicting Sound Pressure Level
But when there are many sources, many reflections, many
receivers, it gets cumbersome to do by hand calcs, so we’d
use engineering software, e.g., SoundPlan, CadnaA
ENC5 p85
University of Adelaide 143
A-Weighting Adjustments
ENC5 p86
University of Adelaide 144
University of Adelaide 145
A-Weighting Adjustments
How to calculate A-weighted SPL
Freq [ Hz] 400 500 630
Linear SPL [dB] 50 60 70
A‐weighting correction [dB] ‐4.8 ‐3.2 ‐1.9
Corrected value [dB] 45.2 56.8 68.1
Squared pressure 𝑝 . ⁄ . ⁄ . ⁄
10 10 10
L p1 10 L p 2 10 L p3 10
L p 10 log10 10 10 10 ...
L p 10 log10 10
45.2 10
10
56.8 10
10
68.1 10
... 68.4 dB(A) re 20Pa
70 mm 1
• Example of apparatus used to 2
67 mm
measure flow resistivity.
3
• Sample is placed in top holder 11
(1). 280 mm 104
mm 5
4 12
• Air is blown into system (10).
• Pressure is measured (11).
6
680 mm
7 10
9
• Basics of Acoustics
• Vibro-acoustic Noise Control
• Air-borne Noise Control
• Liquid-borne Noise Control
• Building Acoustics
University of Adelaide 2
Demonstrations
• Hypersonic Sound Source
– Directional audio
University of Adelaide 4
Learning Outcomes
• Understand noise and vibration transmission concepts
• Understand commonly used noise control solutions
• Ability to select an appropriate noise control technique
University of Adelaide 5
If you only
remember one thing
from this lecture ….
University of Adelaide 6
Questions to Think About
• A roof mounted air-conditioner is causing complaints by
a neighbour. What could be wrong? How could you fix
the issue?
• A factory has metal parts that fall into a collection bin
that generates loud noise. How could this problem be
addressed?
• An air-conditioning duct is generating whistling noise.
What is the likely cause of the noise?
• How does a silencer attenuate sound when there is a
line-of-sight hole straight through the device?
University of Adelaide 7
References
• This excellent “book”
contains principles of
noise and vibration
control.
• Buy from:
www.ingemansson.com
University of Adelaide 8
Noise Propagation Model
Noise and vibration can be reduced at the
University of Adelaide 10
Noise Propagation Model
Each segment, Source / Path / Receiver, can be described
by a particular system / mechanism. Receiver
Source
Path
University of Adelaide 11
Noise Propagation Model
Let’s try an example:
A car driving with passengers
and pedestrians next to road.
List the noise sources,
paths, and receivers.
Receiver
Source
Path
University of Adelaide 12
Airborne sound is usually produced by
vibration of solids and fluids
University of Adelaide 15
Common Mistakes
• Gaps are the most common mistake in noise control.
– Holes to allow piping into enclosures.
– Ventilation that is not designed correctly.
– Doors without seals.
University of Adelaide 16
Practical Example
• Hole between lecture rooms B.20 and B.21 in basement
of Ingkarni Wardli building.
University of Adelaide 17
Practical Example
• Hole in wall allows sound to penetrate between rooms
– Noise causes interference between lectures.
Used this as an
assignment problem for
4th year Eng Acoustics
course.
University of Adelaide 18
Practical Application
• The noise inside an elevator cabin can be reduced by
closing all the gaps.
• Door seals + treated ventilation reduces
cabin noise by 8dB.
Unmodified
Cabin
Vents Open,
Brush Door seals
-1dB
Strips
Foam
Closed Vents -4dB
Strip Closed Vents, -8dB
Door seals
80 85 90 95
SPL (dBA re 20uPa)
University of Adelaide 19
Practical Application
• The drive on an escalator generates noise that escapes
through the gaps between the steps.
Leakage through
Step & Skirt Gaps
University of Adelaide 20
Overall Reduction in SPL Requires
Reduction of ALL Noise Sources
• A 20dB reduction of one of five source,
might only mean an overall reduction 1 dB.
55
50
5 4 3 2 1
Number of Sources at 50dBA
University of Adelaide 23
Transmission Loss of a Panel To be covered in
Topic 12 Enclosures
Source Receiver
Side Side
Thin Panel
University of Adelaide 24
Typical Transmission Loss of a Panel
Uh oh, be
careful here
Mass
Law Damping
Stiffness Controlled
Controlled
Transmission
Loss Coincidence
First Panel Region
Resonance
Frequency
University of Adelaide 25
Coincidence Frequency
• The critical (coincidence) frequency is when the bending
speed in panel matches speed of sound in surrounding
medium
– panel bending wavelength = air acoustic wavelength in air
= B : c B c /
Wavelength in Air
Bending Wavelength
in Panel
University of Adelaide 26
Coincidence Frequency /
𝐵𝜔
Wavespeed
Speed of bending waves in panel 𝑐
𝑚
Speed of sound
cB c in air c
Frequency
Critical Frequency f
c
= B
University of Adelaide 27
Sound Transmission Loss
• wall critical frequency fc (frequency of poor sound
insulation)
– bending wavelength = acoustic wavelength in air:
= B : c B c
c2 m 0.55c 2
fc =
2 B cLh
• m = mass per unit area of panel (kg / m2)
• B = bending stiffness of panel (kg m2 s-2)
• cL = longitudinal wave speed in panel (Appendix 2, text) (m/s)
University of Adelaide 28
Flat Panel
• Bending stiffness B
– isotropic (flat) panels
EI ' Eh3
B
1 v 2
=
12 1 v 2
v = Poisson's ratio (no units)
h = plate thickness ( m )
E = Young's modulus ( Pa )
I’ = second moment of area per unit width. ( m3 )
University of Adelaide 29
Transmission Loss in Mass Law Range
• The TL of a simple panel in the mass law frequency range
can be approximated as (for 1/3 oct bands)
ENC5 p380
TL = Transmission loss ( dB )
𝑓 = one‐third octave band centre frequency ( Hz )
𝜌 = surface density = density * thickness ( kg / m2 )
𝜌 = density of air ( kg / m3 )
𝑐 = speed of sound of air ( m / s )
2000
5000
125 1000 Coincidence
Frequency
University of Adelaide 32
Acoustic behaviour of a panel
• Reducing the stiffness of a panel lowers it's resonance
frequency and raises it's critical frequency, basically
increasing the region for which the mass law applies.
• Increasing panel mass also lowers resonance frequencies
and raises the critical frequency.
• Decreasing panel thickness raises the critical frequency
but generally reduces panel mass.
• Increasing the amount of damping applied to the panel
will not alter the frequencies of resonance and
coincidence but will act to reduce their effect.
• Good insulation is therefore a combination of low
stiffness, high mass and high damping (given cost
constraints).
University of Adelaide 38
Stiffening a panel can
INCREASE the noise level
• A stiffened panel that is excited mechanically radiates
more noise than an unstiffened panel.
0
stiffened Crosswise
-10 stiffened Unstiffened
-10
-20
Unstiffened
-20
-30 -30
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
Hz Hz
TL TL TL
37dB 47dB 55dB
University of Adelaide 40
Double walls should have few connections
University of Adelaide 41
Sound absorption only reduces To be covered in
noise from indirect paths Topic 10 Indoor Sound
Reverberant
field
Direct field
University of Adelaide 42
Sound Absorbed When Striking Walls
University of Adelaide 43
Sound absorption is used in enclosures to
“soak” up sound
• When a noise source is
enclosed, the sound level
inside the cavity is higher
than if the source was not
enclosed.
University of Adelaide 44
Common mistake
• When the receiver is
isolated, sound
absorptive material is of
little use to reduce the
noise.
University of Adelaide 45
Common Mistakes
• Misunderstanding the difference between
stiffness, damping and mass and how they
change a panel’s response.
• Stiffening panel thinking it will make noise
quieter – can make noise worse.
• Applying noise absorption material thinking
it will increase the transmission loss – can
make no difference.
University of Adelaide 46
Structure borne sound
can travel long distances
• Vibration in solids can travel long distances without
being attenuated.
• This is a problem for buildings and ships.
University of Adelaide 47
Application
• Problem: The drive for an Drive
elevator causes the Structure
building to vibrate and borne sound
noise is generated on can travel long
distances and
many floors below. Elevator
Car generate
noise.
University of Adelaide 48
The rate of change determines the
amount of high frequency noise
A bouncing
A ping pong ball is basketball is contact
contact with the with the floor for a
table for a relatively relatively long time
short time and and generates low
generates high frequency noise.
frequency noise.
University of Adelaide 49
Application for Gear Teeth
Rectangular
• The force on the teeth Teeth
rises and falls rapidly, for
teeth with rectangular Sound
Level
shape. High frequency Force
noise is generated.
• Control Measure: A tooth
Force
shape that is smooth has
a continuous force
transfer and the overall Low High
Time
noise is reduced. Smooth
Frequencies Frequencies
Teeth
University of Adelaide 50
Practical Application
• Helicopter gearboxes generate
loud noise and are often attached
to the fuselage.
University of Adelaide 51
High Frequency Sound is To be covered in
Directional and Easy to Reflect Topic 8 Sound Sources
University of Adelaide 54
Application
• High frequency noise
travels directly from the
high speed riveting machine
to the worker’s ears.
University of Adelaide 55
Demonstration of HyperSonic Sound
Higher frequency sound is To be covered in
Topic 11 Outdoor Sound
reduced by passing through air
University of Adelaide 69
Vibrating plates generate noise
• The noise from a vibrating machine is amplified
when it is in contact with objects that have large
surface area.
Vibrations from a shaver Vibrations are not
are transmitted into a transmitted to the
glass plate that amplifies plate and the noise
the noise. is lower.
University of Adelaide 70
Demonstration
• Vibrating Plate Generates Noise
-- sometimes try to avoid vibration getting into
structures as it can radiate sound really well.
University of Adelaide 71
Demonstration
• Distributed Mode Loudspeakers
-- sometimes it is good to put vibration into structures to
generate sound.
University of Adelaide 72
Demonstration
• Throat microphone
-- you can use a vibration sensing microphone to prevent
airborne sound from being heard.
Throat mic
Normal mic
University of Adelaide 75
Bone Conduction Headphones
A counter example of how vibrations can be useful
• Sound transmitted as vibration into skull so that you can
hear sound.
University of Adelaide 77
Applications
Problem: A noisy hydraulic system. Solution: break the transmission
Most of the noise comes from the path and the noise level
vibrating instrument panel decreases.
Noise radiated
Instrument by the panel Instrument Panel
Panel moved to the wall
Pump and
Motor
University of Adelaide 78
Practical Application
• Escalator has a drive
module that couples Sound radiated from
with the balustrade balustrade glass
glass.
• Break the
transmission path by
using vibration
isolators.
University of Adelaide 79
Practical Application
• Vibration from machinery on a submarine must be
vibration isolated from the hull.
Radiated Noise Exhaust
E lec tro n ic A rrays
Flow inducing
Vibration from C o n tr o l C e n tr e vibration of
propeller into structure
M a in M o to r D ie se l E n g in es & G e n e ra to rs T o r p e d o S y s te m
hull
Vibration from engines into hull Vibration from machinery into hull
University of Adelaide 83
Practical Application
• Install vibration isolators between engine and hull.
Vibration
Isolators
University of Adelaide 84
Common Mistakes
• Attaching piping or ducting to the walls of enclosures.
• Attaching instrument panels to vibrating parts.
• Once vibration gets into a structure, the energy can
travel and re-radiate from panels.
University of Adelaide 85
Densely perforated plates
produce less noise
• A vibrating large solid plate can generate noise. An
alternative is to use a perforated metal plate or mesh.
Sound
Level
University of Adelaide 86
Application
University of Adelaide 87
Long narrow plate radiates
less noise than a square one
• When a plate vibrates
sound comes from both
sides. At the edges the
pressure difference Pressure
equalization
balances so radiated
noise is low.
University of Adelaide 88
Applications
• Control Measure is to
replace the belt with
narrow separated belts,
which reduces the
radiated noise.
University of Adelaide 89
Practical Example See video on new
Engineering South Lift
University of Adelaide 90
Pictures of Lift Motor in Eng South
University of Adelaide 91
Application
• When parts strike the
cart, loud noise is
radiated.
University of Adelaide 95
Plates with free edges radiate
less low frequency noise
• Pressure equalization Pressure
occur at the edges of equalization
plates.
– Enclosing the edges
prevents pressure
equalization.
University of Adelaide 96
A Damped Surface Radiates Less Sound
• Vibration decreases as it moves across a plate. The
amount it decreases depends on the internal damping.
Steel plate has extremely poor damping. Damping can be
improved by adding coatings or intermediate layers.
Steel
Steel plate Damping layer
has poor
Steel
damping
Thick damping layer
Steel
Lead has Thin hard fiber plate
good Thick porous fiber plate
damping
Steel
University of Adelaide 97
Practical Application
• Damping material applied to panels
Laminated Glass
University of Adelaide 98
Application
Sheet metal cover
radiates noise
Problem: the loudest
noise from a pump and
motor comes from the
coupling guard made of
sheet metal
Placing a
finger against
Tap against a the glass
glass and dampens the
produces a vibration and
loud ring less noise is
generated.
Reinforced
disc
Cavity filled
with rubber
Blade
Flanges
generate
turbulence
Strong turbulence
• Problem: A branch in a
steam line has three
valves that produce a Control
loud shrieking sound. Cut-off
valve valve
• Solution: Piping
replaced with gradual
bends and distance
Gradual
increased between
bends
valves.
Increased Distance
University of Adelaide Page 110
Jet noise can be reduced by using
an extra air stream
• High speed air (>100m/s) generates significant
turbulence and noise at the exit.
High Large change in
speed speed across
stream stream
• Reducing the exit speed by one half may decrease the
noise level by about 20dB. The noise level is determined
by the speed of the jet relative to the surrounding air.
High Small change in
speed
stream speed across
stream
Slow speed stream
Branched High
Pipe Frequency
Noise
Mixing Region
University of Adelaide 115
Application
• Problem: Steam safety
valve produces high noise
levels. Perforated
Plate
• Solution: A diffuser with
perforated cone and high Sound
frequency muffler allows absorptive
high flow rate. Jet speed material
is reduced by a factor of 4
and total noise is reduced
by about 20dB. Diffuser
with many
small jets
Exhaust
Weak
Turbulence
University of Adelaide 117
Application
Control vanes Increased Distance
too close to fan
Sharp bend
causes
turbulence
Increased Distance
University of Adelaide 118
Abrupt changes in area produce noise
• Turbulence and noise will be created if the cross-
sectional area increases abruptly. A gradual change in
area by using a gradual change in area.
Large
diameter
seal
Mixing Region
Turbulence
creates noise
The disturbed
exit flow creates
more turbulence
Mixing Region and more noise.
No reflections
Reflection when
area increases
Reflection at
branch in duct
Vent into
cabin
Doors
Elevator
Hang-on Cabin
Panel
Vent into cabin
Lined Duct
Expansion
Chamber
Contraction
Helmholtz
Resonator
Spring
Mass
To Be Covered in Topic 14
Thick absorptive
Thick material, small
absorptive spacing
material,
large spacing
• Solution: Rubber
Use flexible connectors Isolator
Spring
between the pipe Isolator
support and the wall
Instrumentation
Instrumentation
We need to be able to measure and quantify sound.
University of Adelaide 2
Course Content – How it fits
TOPIC
p
Basics t
Instrumentation
The Ear
16 A
N Ve S m
or ry ho pli
R
m l o ut
ais
8 al fi e
ud d
ed
vo
Distance in metres
ic
4 e
Criteria
li m
Ex it
2 pe
ct
ed
Vo
1 i ce
Le
ve
0.5 l
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dBre 20 Pa)
University of Adelaide 3
Contents
• Microphones: Condenser, Piezoelectric
• Sound Level Meters
• Spectrum analysers
• Statistical analysers
• Noise dose meters
• Intensity meters
• Instrumentation for sound source localisation
University of Adelaide 4
Learning Outcomes
Be able to:
• Recognise various instruments that are available for
conducting acoustic measurements.
• Select appropriate instrumentation for measuring sound.
• Have an understanding of practical measurement
procedures.
University of Adelaide 5
Microphones
Instrument grade
Usually
Usually around
around $4500
$1500
Consumer grade
$1
University of Adelaide 6
Microphones
Microphone types.
• condenser
– externally polarised
• some mics need to have a 200V polarisation voltage applied
– prepolarised
• Piezoelectric
University of Adelaide 8
Microphones - Condenser
Equalization adjustment
Spring arrangement silver wire
Capillary tube for pressure Diaghragm
equalization
Symmetrical
protection grid
• Output voltage E
K1 Q x K 1 Q x2
K1 Q x
1+ C s / C h (1 + C s / C )2 1 + C s / C
• K1 is geometry dependent and determined by calibration
• Cs /C and x/h made small to minimise non-linear terms
• x = -k3Ap, where A is the diaphragm area
• k3 is the diaphragm stiffness
ENC5 p136
University of Adelaide 10
Microphones - Condenser
• Vent provides mean pressure equalisation across
microphone diaphragm
• Size of vent controls mic. low frequency response limit
1
f co =
2 R v C dc
1 1 Cd + Cc
1
where = + =
C dc C c C d Cd Cc
8
Rv =
a4
Vc
C c=
P
ENC p97
University of Adelaide 11
Microphones - Condenser
• vent is a tube of radius, a, and length, l
• γ = 1.4 = ratio of specific heats for air
• P is the mean atmospheric pressure (Pa).
• typical value for Cc is 2.8 10-12
• typical value for the diaphragm compliance, Cd, is 0.3 10-12 m5/N
• μ is the dynamic viscosity for air
= 1.84 10-5 N-s/m5 at 20C
University of Adelaide 12
Microphones - Condenser
14
Free Field Corrections for
12 Microphones 4133, 4134,
Response varies 6
with angle of 4
60°
incidence 2
Random
0
90°
–2
–4 120°
–6 °
150°
–8
– 10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 15 20 30 40 50 60 70 100
Frequency (kHz)
Condenser Microphone Cartridges — Types 4133 to 4181, Bruel and Kjaer
University of Adelaide 13
Frequency Response & Directivity
dB
10
0
10
20
1000 Hz
20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000 10k 20k
Frequency (Hz)
dB
10
0
10
20
University of Adelaide 19
Microphone - Piezoelectric
E= K2 x
1 + C s /C
ENC5 p138
University of Adelaide 20
Microphones
• Sensitivity
S = 20 log10 E L p + 94 dB re lV/Pa ENC5 p140
University of Adelaide 21
Sound Level Meters
• used to measure sound pressure level
• 2 grades of sound level meter
– type 1 - precision (± 0.5 dB)
– type 2 - general purpose (± 1.0 dB)
University of Adelaide 23
University of Adelaide 24
Sound Level Meter
Possible sources of error:
• microphone vibration
• SLM vibration
• background noise
• overloading input amplifier while using filters
• temperature out of -40 to 150C range
• moisture and dust on microphone diaphragm
• reflections from nearby surfaces
• wind noise due to wind blowing over microphone or
nearby objects
‐> Learning Outcome: practical use of equipment.
Listen to discussion for details
University of Adelaide 26
Weighting Networks
• A-weighting most
common
– reflects ear response at low
levels
– discriminates against low
frequencies which are not
heard as easily
ENC p104
University of Adelaide 27
Quantifying Fluctuating Sound
• Most sound is unsteady in amplitude, duration,
frequency.
• How is an average value calculated?
• LAeq , A-weighted equivalent continuous level
1 ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 10 𝑑𝑡 ENC5 p143
𝑇
University of Adelaide 28
Statistics
• L10 L90 are most common.
• Note L10 > L90 for the same noise.
Lmaximum
L10
SPL
LAeq
[dB(A)]
L90
Lminimum
T Time (s)
University of Adelaide 29
Example
• Adelaide City Council has noise provisions for music
noise
University of Adelaide 30
Example
Another good document:
http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/5593AE74A5B486F2CA257B5E
0014E33C/$FILE/Wind%20farms,%20sound%20and%20%20health%20
‐%20Technical%20information%20WEB.pdf
University of Adelaide 31
Example Animations
Have a look at the animated examples on this web site:
http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/noise_education/web/ENG_
EPD_HTML/m2/types_3.html
University of Adelaide 32
Example
EXAMPLE LAeq CALCULATION
• 90 dB(A) for 3 hours
• 94 dB(A) for 2 hours
• 100 dB(A) for 1 hour
University of Adelaide 33
Example
• Calculation of overall A-weighted sound level from
octave band linear levels :
• Overall A-level:
. . . . . . .
10 log 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
84.6 dB A
University of Adelaide 34
Other Types of Acoustic Instruments
• DATA LOGGERS
– measure distribution of fluctuating noises over long time
periods, generally over several weeks.
https://www.bksv.com/en/products/environment‐management/noise‐and‐
vibration‐monitoring‐terminals/noise‐monitoring‐terminal‐family‐3639
University of Adelaide 35
Other Types of Acoustic Instruments
• SPECTRUM ANALYSERS
– provide a detailed description of average or
instantaneous noise level vs frequency
– useful for analysis of signals containing tones
– frequency of tones can indicate sources of noise.
University of Adelaide 36
Other Types of Acoustic Instruments
• Personal Sound Exposure Meters (Noise Dosimeters)
– measure cumulative noise dose to assess hearing damage risk
– worn on the person - small and simple to operate
University of Adelaide 38
Instrumenting a person
University of Adelaide 39
Measurement of Sound Power
• Previous instruments were used to measure sound
pressure levels.
• How can we measure sound power levels?
• Couple of ways…
University of Adelaide 40
Measurement of Sound Power
• Sound Intensity Meter
– may be special purpose
– may be configured using software and a dual channel spectrum
analyser
– require measurement of the time integral of the product of the
instantaneous acoustic
– pressure and particle velocity
– two microphones needed for p-p measurement
– particle velocity related to the pressure gradient
University of Adelaide 41
Sound Intensity Probe
University of Adelaide 42
Sound Intensity Calibrator
University of Adelaide 43
Sound Intensity
• Remember from lecture on Fundamentals
The active (real) intensity is
University of Adelaide 44
Sound Intensity Measurement
• When measuring sound intensity, the best spacing
between the microphones depends on the frequency
range to be measured.
Harris, C.M., “Handbook of Acoustic Measurements and Noise Control: Third Edition”, Acoustical Society of America, New York, USA 1998.
University of Adelaide 45
Measurement of Sound Intensity
University of Adelaide 46
Measurement of Sound Intensity
This technique can be used for to
Example: measuring sound power from
measure noise sources in a large
an exhaust on a roof
industrial factory, and then feeds into a
computational model for noise
prediction (e.g. SoundPlan)
University of Adelaide 47
Reason for Measuring Sound Power
• It is the fundamental measure of how
much noise a machine is making.
• Can then make future predictions about
the expected sound level.
University of Adelaide 48
Microflown
• Measures acoustic particle velocity
• Only instrument that directly measures particle velocity
http://www.microflown.com/files/media/library/presentations/microflown‐anewcategoryofsensors.pdf
University of Adelaide 53
Multiple microphones
University of Adelaide 54
Other Instruments
• Artificial Headforms
University of Adelaide 55
Other Instruments
• Binaural Microphones (for audio applications)
University of Adelaide 56
Impedance Tube
Used to measure absorption coefficient of materials.
• Sample is placed at the end (or with a small air gap) of a closed
tube.
• Loudspeaker generates white / pink noise.
• 2 or 4 microphones used to determine the incident and
reflected sound power, and hence calculates the sound power
absorbed by the sample, and the absorption coefficient.
University of Adelaide 57
Impedance Tube
Typical modern impedance tube Old school setup that uses
measurement of amplitudes of
standing waves.
University of Adelaide 58
Impedance Tube
University of Adelaide 60
Statistical Acoustic Holography
University of Adelaide 61
Acoustic Arrays in Wind Tunnels
University of Adelaide 62
Example of Locating Sound Sources
University of Adelaide 63
Acoustic Camera Examples
Engine development
Industrial noise at a refinery
University of Adelaide 64
Acoustic Camera Examples
• Can locate sound sources on moving objects
University of Adelaide 65
Thebarton Wind Tunnel
University of Adelaide 66
Acoustic Holography
• Diagnosis of noise source from wind tunnel.
University of Adelaide 67
Refracto-Vibrometry
University of Adelaide 68
Omni-Directional Speakers
University of Adelaide 70
Questions
• What instrument would you use to determine the noise
exposure of a person?
• What instrument would you use to measure sound
intensity?
• Describe 3 methods to measure sound power of a noise
source.
• What device could you use to measure the sound
absorption coefficient of acoustic foam?
• The sound pressure level measured from a noise source
radiating omni-directionally will decrease at a rate of
___ dB per doubling of distance?
University of Adelaide 71
Questions
• What instrument would you use to record the sound
levels a person is exposed to over a week period?
• Which instruments can be used to measure sound power
levels?
• A microphone and pre-amplifier generates a voltage
when exposed to sound. What instrument is used to
calibrate the measurement system?
University of Adelaide 72
The Human Ear
Contents
• Anatomy of the human ear
• Outer ear
• Middle ear
• Inner ear
• Hair cells
• Neural encoding
• Noise induced hearing loss
• Pitch and source localisation
• Basilar membrane response
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
• Basic anatomy of the human ear.
• Understand how the human ear converts sound into an
auditory response.
• Basic understanding of hearing loss.
• Basic understanding of sound localisation.
University of Adelaide 4
Questions To Think About
• What is the mechanical gain by the bones in the middle
ear?
• In which frequency band does hearing loss first occur?
• What would be the expected hearing range of a mouse,
if the size of the anatomical parts scaled accordingly?
• If the bones in the middle ear are seized,
is it possible to hear?
• Do humans have a higher threshold of hearing
(i.e. can’t hear sound) at lower frequencies or
frequencies for speech?
University of Adelaide 5
Range of Hearing in Humans
ENC5 p85
University of Adelaide 9
Anatomy of the Human Ear
University of Adelaide 10
http://ocw.usu.edu/Electrical_and_Computer_Engineering/Science_of_Sound/ECE_3260__ear.swf‐view.html
University of Adelaide 11
Other Animations on the Internet
• Excellent animation with lots of details
http://www.sumanasinc.com/webcontent/animations/c
ontent/soundtransduction.html
University of Adelaide 12
Outer Ear
• PINNA
– Antenna with directional properties above
5000 Hz (λ = 69mm) to 17,000 - 20,000 Hz (λ = 17mm)
• AUDITORY CANAL
– average length, 23mm
– closed organ pipe resonance . 4,000 Hz
corresponding to λ/4 = 23mm
– resonance amplification at 4,000 Hz . 3 due to pressure
maximum at eardrum (tympanic membrane)
• EARDRUM
– cone shaped diaphragm, 9mm dia.
University of Adelaide 13
Middle Ear
• connected to throat through eustacean tube
• air-filled: volume . 2cc
• mechanical transformer
– converts small pressures and large displacements into vice versa
– consists of 3 tiny bones (hammer, anvil, stirrup / stapes) which
connect the eardrum to the oval window
– mechanical advantage of 3:1
area of eardrum
– 5
area of oval window
University of Adelaide 14
Inner Ear - Cochlea
University of Adelaide 15
Cross-Section of Cochlear Duct
Resonance
Stapes
Oval Window
Helicotrema
Round
Window
Schematic of cochlea (unrolled)
University of Adelaide 16
Cross-Section of Cochlea
Cochlea Duct
University of Adelaide 17
Cross-Section of Cochlear Duct
Resonance
Stapes
Oval Window
Helicotrema
Round
Window
University of Adelaide 18
Inner Ear - Cochlea
• spiral chamber 2 turns
• houses hearing organs
• divided into 3 chambers, 34 mm long
– upper gallery
– lower gallery
– cochlear partition
• upper and lower galleries joined at apex
• flexible walls of cochlea duct result in dispersive sound
propagation
– wavelength dependent on location
– speed of sound goes to zero at a particular basilar membrane
location for every frequency, resulting in large amplification of
basilar membrane motion at that point
– location depends on frequency
University of Adelaide 19
Cochlear
• Image of the cochlea and basilar membrane unwound.
• Provides spatial to spectral coupling because discrete frequencies
excite locations along the basilar membrane.
• Similarly, a prism performs frequency-spatial mapping by dividing a
broadband signal, while light, into its frequency content as a
function of space.
Fig 6.1, Fastl and Zwicker, Psychoacoustics, Facts and Models (2007)
University of Adelaide 21
Basilar Membrane
Fig 3.5, Fastl and Zwicker, Psychoacoustics, Facts and Models (2007)
University of Adelaide 22
Inner Ear - Cochlea (Cont.)
• High frequencies only excite that part of gallery near oval
window
• Round window - pressure release mechanism
• Basilar membrane
– separates upper and lower galleries
– controls overall stiffness of cochlear partition
– its vibration determines how we hear
– stiffness decreases as apex of the cochlea is approached such that
different parts of the membrane are resonant at different audio
frequencies
University of Adelaide 23
Hair Cells
• Sound sensing organs
• Transform shear force (or displacement) to an analog voltage
• Attached to basilar membrane
• Contained in organ of corti
• Outer hair cells
– sense fluid displacement
– end of stereocelia attached to tectorial membrane
– extension and contraction of hair cells as a result of the generated
voltage causes additional movement of the tectorial membrane,
resulting in about 25dB amplification of motion of inner hair cell
stereocelia - feedback mechanism to amplify low level sound
– responsible for selective amplification allowing us to focus on a
particular conversation in a noisy environment such as a party.
University of Adelaide 24
• Inner hair cells
– sense velocity
– ends of stereocelia are free
– responsible for detecting the sound
University of Adelaide 25
Neural Encoding
• Cochlear nerve (attached to each hair cell)
– efferent (signals from brain to ear)
– afferent (signals from ear to brain)
• Cells of afferent nervous system convert analog signal from
hair cells to digital code
– fire once each cycle in phase up to 5 kHz; helps in determining
frequency
– Random phase above 5 kHz
– fire when threshold voltage exceeded
– not all fire
– probability of firing increases as voltage increases
• encoding rate to brain by nervous system is 170Hz max.
• ear does all frequency analysis and encoding rate is
proportional to loudness
University of Adelaide 26
• hair cells are characterised by resonance frequencies
– correspond to basilar membrane resonance at same location
– effectively increases "Q" of basilar membrane and thus
sensitivity of ear to changes in pitch
• efferent nerve system carrying instructions from brain to
outer hair cells
– can control state of outer hair cells (turn on or off)
– can also amplify the motion of the outer hair cell stereocelia
(referred to as “un-damping”) and increase fluid velocity past the
inner hair cells which actually sense the sound
– act as a volume control to maintain inner hair cell neuron firing
within the dynamic range of brain
University of Adelaide 27
Noise Induced Hearing Loss
• stereocelia on outer hair cells fatigue and break first when
subjected to excessive noise resulting in loss of ability to
– locate noise sources
– converse in a noisy environment
– first sign of noise induced loss
– not helped by conventional hearing aid
• following outer hair cell loss, inner hair cells lost progressively
– first noticed in 4000Hz to 6000Hz range (see next 2 slides)
– speech range (500Hz to 2000Hz) eventually affected
University of Adelaide 28
Presbyacusis
• hearing loss occurring as part of the aging process
Age
100 (years)
M
80
80 W
Hearing threshold (dB)
60
M
Speech range 60
W
40
M
40
20 W
20
60
M
Speech range 60
W
40
M
40
20 W
20
http://www.neurophys.wisc.edu/~ychen/auditory/audiogram/audiogrammain.html
University of Adelaide 31
Moderate Damage
http://www.neurophys.wisc.edu/~ychen/auditory/audiogram/audiogrammain.html
University of Adelaide 32
Severe Damage
http://www.neurophys.wisc.edu/~ychen/auditory/audiogram/audiogrammain.html
University of Adelaide 33
Cochlear implant
• possible help
– prosthesis implanted
in cochlear
– electrodes excite hair
cells selectively and
cause neurons to fire
– problems in fitting
and properly
localising stimuli
University of Adelaide 34
Prosthesis In Cochlear
University of Adelaide 36
Hearing with a Cochlear Implant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpKKYBkJ9Hw
University of Adelaide 38
University of Adelaide 39
University of Adelaide 40
Source Localisation
The way humans can determine the location of a noise source
depends on several “clues”
A. Spectral cues
B. Interaural Time Difference – it takes a bit longer for sound to
reach the other ear
C. Interaural Level Difference – there is shadowing by the head.
University of Adelaide 42
Source Localisation
But everyone has a unique pinna.
https://www.ossic.com/blog/2017/10/4/what‐is‐a‐hrtf
Hence, generic HRTF filters are not excellent for creating believable
Virtual Reality experiences.
University of Adelaide 47
Binaural Hearing
• Localization
– Some sources always sound like they are originating from a
particular direction.
University of Adelaide 48
Binaural Hearing
• Hence, the sound recorded by a microphone “sounds”
very different compared to a binaural artificial headform.
• The microphone has no diffraction by shape of head,
no reflections, no ears, no …. so the response is very
different.
University of Adelaide 49
Masking
• Low frequencies mask high
frequencies
– Notice how low frequency response
will interfere with high frequency
response.
University of Adelaide 52
• Following from previous figures…
Location of maximum response from stapes end
depends on frequency.
University of Adelaide 53
Summary
• Anatomy of the human ear
• Outer ear
• Middle ear
• Inner ear
• Hair cells
• Neural encoding
• Noise induced hearing loss
• Pitch and source localisation
• Basilar membrane response
University of Adelaide 54
Noise Criteria
Course Content – Where Are We?
TOPIC
The Ear
16 A
N Ve S m
or ry ho pli
R
m l o ut
ais
8 al fi e
ud d
ed
vo
Distance in metres
ic
4 e
Criteria
li m
Ex it
2 pe
ct
ed
Vo
1 i ce
Le
ve
0.5 l
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dBre 20 Pa)
Psychoacoustics
positive
pdipole
Sound Sources
a
d/2 r
d/2
negative
Sound Power
University of Adelaide 2
Contents
• Noise Descriptors
• Noise Criteria
• Noise Induced Hearing Loss and Criteria
• Speech Interference
• Building Acoustics Criteria
• Environmental Noise Criteria
• Environmental Noise Surveys
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
University of Adelaide 4
Questions to Think About
• How do you determine the noise exposure a person
receives?
• What are the noise limits for workplaces?
• How do you rate the noise level in a room?
• What level of sound is going to cause communication
problems?
• How do you measure noise levels outside due to
industrial operations?
• What are the limits on these noise levels?
University of Adelaide 5
Questions Asked This Lecture
• Q1 An employee working at a bar in a night club is
exposed to 105 dB(A) for a 4 hour shift.
a) What is the A-weighted Sound Exposure?
b) What is the 8-hour equivalent level?
c) How much would the shift length have to be reduced to comply
with the 85 dB(A) 8 hour requirement?
• Q2 SPL is measured as
Freq [Hz] 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
SPL [dB] 48 48 43 38 30 20 16 12
University of Adelaide 7
Resources
• Bies and Hansen, “Engineering Noise Control”
• National Acoustics Laboratory, Hearing Loss Simulator:
https://www.nal.gov.au/about-hearing-loss/hearing-
loss-simulations/
• National Acoustics Laboratory, Binge Listening report
University of Adelaide 8
Noise and Health Issues
• World Health Organisation (WHO)
Noise is the second largest environmental cause of health
problems, just after the impact of air quality
(particulate matter).
• European Union study, Health implication of road,
railway and aircraft noise in the European Union
found that exposure to noise in Europe contributes to:
– about 910,000 additional prevalent cases of hypertension,
– 43,000 hospital admissions per year, and
– at least 10,000 premature deaths per year related to coronary
heart disease and stroke.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/health_effects_en.htm
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/383921/noise‐guidelines‐eng.pdf
University of Adelaide 9
Noise and Health Issues
• In the USA, hearing loss is the third-most common
chronic physical condition among adults,
after hypertension and arthritis, and is
more prevalent than diabetes or cancer.
• About 11% of the U.S. working population has hearing
difficulty.
• About 24% of the hearing difficulty among U.S. workers
is caused by occupational exposures.
• About 8% of the U.S. working population has tinnitus
('ringing in the ears') and 4% has both hearing difficulty
and tinnitus.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ohl/
University of Adelaide 10
Background
• BHP Billiton (2003), a major mining and manufacturing
company in Australia (and globally), conducted an
extensive assessment of exposures in the workplace, and
reported that 51% of employees are potentially
exposed above the noise exposure limits (if no hearing
protection is used).
BHP Billiton (2003) Health, Safety, Environment and Community Report,
2003. Performance Summaries.
University of Adelaide 11
Background
• BHP report:
Massive increase!
Twice as big as
musculoskeletal !
http://www.bhp.com/‐/media/bhp/documents/investors/annual‐
reports/2015/bhpbillitonstrategicreport2015.pdf?la=en
University of Adelaide 12
Background
• When personal music players are set at maximum
volume, it is possible to exceed the recommended
standard limits in as little as 5 minutes .
Cory D.F. Portnuff and Brian J. Fligor. Sound output levels of the ipod and other mp3
players: Is there potential risk to hearing? In Noise-Induced Hearing Loss In Children
At Work And Play, Embassy Suites River Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, October 19-20
2006. National Hearing Conservation Association.
http://www.hearingconservation.org/docs/virtualPressRoom/portnuff.htm.
• Hearing loss occurs due to both advancing age and
environmental exposure (e.g. loud noise, smoking,
chemicals, drugs, …)
– Commonly used medicines that may cause hearing loss include:
Aspirin, when large doses (8 to 12 pills a day) are taken.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as
ibuprofen and naproxen. Certain antibiotics, especially
aminoglycosides (such as gentamicin, streptomycin, and
neomycin).
University of Adelaide 13
Noise Descriptors
• A-weighted Equivalent Continuous Noise Level
(times are in hours)
– used for occupational and environmental noise
1 ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 10 𝑑𝑡
𝑇 ENC5 p84
University of Adelaide 14
Noise Descriptors
• For occupational noise, most common descriptor is 𝐿 ,
• For sound experienced over 𝑇 hours:
1 ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 10 𝑑𝑡 ENC5 p85
8
University of Adelaide 15
Example
• An employee in a factory spends…
Activity Time [hrs] SPL [dB(A)]
Breaks 1.5 65
Grinding 2 100
Machine press 2 93
Paint shop 1.5 70
Assembly line 1.0 90
TOTAL 8
1
𝐿 , 10 log 𝑡 10 ⁄ 𝑡 10 ⁄ . . . 𝑡 10 ⁄
8
1 1.5 10 ⁄ 2 10 ⁄ 2 10 ⁄
10 log
8 1.5 10 ⁄ 1.0 10 ⁄
94.95 dB A
95.0 dB A
University of Adelaide 16
Noise Descriptors
• A-weighted Sound Exposure (where times are in hours)
𝐸 , 4𝑇 10 , ⁄
Pa2 h ENC5 p87
For practical purposes a noise exposure of
1.0 Pa2h corresponds to LAeq,8h of 85 dB(A).
University of Adelaide 17
Noise Descriptors
• A-weighted Sound Exposure Level, LAE or SEL, where
times are in seconds.
𝑝 𝑡 𝐸 , 3600
𝐿 10 log 𝑑𝑡 10log dB
𝑝 𝑝 ENC5 p87
University of Adelaide 18
Noise Descriptors
• From the preceding equations we can write:
𝐸, 1 ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 10 log 10 ,
3.2 10 28,800
ENC5 p87
ENC5 p88
Ouch!
University of Adelaide 19
Noise Descriptors
• Community Noise Equivalent Level, Lden or CNEL
ENC5 p88
University of Adelaide 20
Example – Lden is used
• World Health Organization Report:
Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/383921/noise‐guidelines‐eng.pdf
University of Adelaide 21
Example
• An employee in a factory spends…
University of Adelaide 22
Example
• Or using the formula
⁄
𝐸 , 4𝑇 10 ,
⁄ ⁄
4 1.5 10 4 2 10
⁄ ⁄
4 2 10 4 1.5 10
⁄
4 1.0 10
10.0 Pa h
University of Adelaide 23
Example
• Which can be converted back into an LAeq,8h value
𝐸,
𝐿 , 10 log
3.2 10
10.0
10 log
3.2 10
94.95 dB A
95.0 dB A
University of Adelaide 24
Example
University of Adelaide 25
Noise Criteria
• provide a guide for acceptable noise levels
• provide a means for estimating required noise reduction
• provide the means for determining feasibility of
alternative solutions
• provide a means for estimating the cost of noise control
• Industrial criteria fall into 4 categories
– hearing damage risk
• steady state noise
• impulse and impact noise
– speech interference
– work efficiency
– environmental
University of Adelaide 26
Presbyacusis
• hearing loss occurring as part of the aging process
Age
100 (years)
M
80
80 W
Hearing threshold (dB)
60
M
Speech range 60
W
40
M
40
20 W
20
University of Adelaide 28
Change in Hearing Threshold
Age
100 (years)
M
80
80 W
Hearing threshold (dB)
60
M
Speech range 60
W
40
M
40
20 W
20
University of Adelaide 30
My audiogram …
Age 26
Age 40 ?
University of Adelaide 32
Noise Induced Hearing Loss
• What happens?
• Speech recognition requirements
– frequencies 500 - 2000Hz critical – have a look at the graph
– Can’t hear –ch -sh, etc sounds, e.g. “beach”, “teach”, “peach”.
– Quote from Madagascar movie - Alex the Lion:
“Did he just say Grand Central Station, or my aunt's constipation?"
• Loss occurs first between 4kHz and 6kHz
• Short exposure - temporary loss
(temporary threshold shift) … been to a loud nightclub?
– complete recovery if not too severe
– permanent loss if exposure severe or repeated sufficiently often
– gradually spreads to lower and higher frequencies
(than 4-6 kHz)
University of Adelaide 33
Noise Induced Hearing Loss
• Subjective perception of loss
– some loss of hearing for high pitched squeaks in machinery
– difficult to understand speech in a noisy environment
University of Adelaide 34
ISO 1999 Damage Risk Assessment
• calculate normalised 8 hour equivalent noise level LAeq,8h
1 ⁄
ENC5 p85
𝐿 , 10 log 10 𝑑𝑡
8
University of Adelaide 35
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
• Hearing loss H′ (or Hearing Level) is
University of Adelaide 36
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
• Table 1. Values of the coefficients u, v and L0 used to
determine the NIPTS for the median value of the
population, N0,50
Frequency u v L0
Hz dB
ENC5 p95
University of Adelaide 37
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
• Other fractiles NQ from N Q N 50 kd u 5 Q 50
– k from Table 2 N Q N 50 kd L 50 Q 9
du X u Yu log10 L Aeq,8h Lo 2
Q k
ENC5 p96
University of Adelaide 39
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
• Table 3. Constants for calculating NQ fractiles.
Frequency Xu Yu XL YL
(Hz)
ENC5 p96
University of Adelaide 40
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
Threshold shift H50, for the 50% fractile due to age alone:
H 50 aY 18
2
Y=age in years
University of Adelaide 41
ISO 1999.2 (cont.)
• Table 4. Values of the parameters and used to
determine respectively the upper and lower parts of the
statistical distribution HQ.
Frequency Value of bu Value of b L Value of a
University of Adelaide 42
Allowable LAeq,8h
• Almost universally 85 dB(A) for 8 hours
University of Adelaide 43
Allowable LAeq,8h
Relevant Standards:
• Safe Work Australia
• Model Code of Practice: Managing noise and preventing
hearing loss at work, 26 October 2018
https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/model-code-
practice-managing-noise-and-preventing-hearing-loss-work
University of Adelaide 45
Trading Rules for Non-continuous Exposure
Time Time
University of Adelaide 47
Trading Rules for Non-continuous Exposure
• Defined as the decibel increase in noise level which is equivalent to
an exposure time increase by a factor of 2.
• Equation for equivalent sound level can be rewritten more generally
as
10 1 ⁄
𝐿 , log 10 𝑑𝑡 ENC5 p101
𝑛 8
𝐿 1 ⁄
𝐿 , log 2 𝑑𝑡 𝐿
. 0.301 8
ENC5 p101
University of Adelaide 48
Trading Rules for Non-continuous Exposure
, ⁄ ENC5 p102
University of Adelaide 50
Trading Rules for Non-continuous Exposure
• Daily noise dose (DND) , ⁄
University of Adelaide 51
Exposure for Number of Hours Different
Than 8 Hours Per Day
• Example: 85 dB(A) for 16 hours per day
3 1 ⁄
𝐿 , log 16 2 85 dB A 88 dB A
0.301 8
Note that the "8" in the above equation has been replaced
by the actual number of hours of exposure.
University of Adelaide 52
Advice for Solving Noise Exposure Problems
University of Adelaide 53
Question …
An employee working at a bar in a night club is exposed to
105 dB(A) for a 4 hour shift.
University of Adelaide 54
Comments …
Research conducted by The National Acoustic Laboratories in
Australia measured noise levels at nightclubs.
The average noise level for the clubs visited was 98 dBA,
and measurements ranged from
91 dBA to 106 dBA
throughout the time period from 9pm to 3am.
University of Adelaide 65
Comments …
AYE = Allowable Yearly Exposure, based on acceptable workplace levels Protect your ears!
Wear ear plugs.
National Acoustics Laboratory, Binge Listening report, p7‐8.
University of Adelaide 66
Hearing Protection Devices ENC5 p107
Electronic
pass‐through
University of Adelaide 67
Hearing Protection Devices
• Several rating schemes, used in various jurisdictions
– Noise Reduction Rating NRR (USA)
– Noise Reduction Rating Subjective Fit NRR(SF) (USA)
– Noise Level Reduction Statistics, NRSAx (USA)
– Single Number Rating SNR (Europe)
– Sound Level Conversion SLC80 (Australia) – estimate of the
amount of noise reduction for 80% of users.
Class SLC80 range, dB Max SPL, dBA
1 10 to 13 Less than 90
2 14 to 17 90 to 95
3 18 to 21 95 to 100
4 22 to 25 100 to 105
5 26 or greater 105 to 110 ENC5 p112
University of Adelaide 68
Hearing Protection Devices
Sound Level Conversion SLC80
• The A-weighted protected level is calculated by subtracting
the SLC80 value from the measured
C-weighted exposure level as:
𝐿 , 𝐿 , SLC
• Note that use of the SLC80 method requires measurement of
the LCeq,8h, which will typically be a few dB more than the
corresponding LAeq,8h.
• If the Lexp,Aeq,8h is greater than or equal to 110 dBA, or if the
ambient noise is characterised by high levels of narrow band
noise, or high levels of tonal noise, or high levels of low or high
frequency components, then the octave-band method
described in (AS/NZS 1270:2002 , R2014, Appendix A) should
be used.
University of Adelaide 69
Hearing Protection Devices
Example of SLC80 calculation
• A worker has a C-weighted exposure level of
𝐿 , , 100 dB C .
It is desired to have a protected noise level at the ears of
the worker when wearing hearing protection of
Lprot,Aeq,8h = 80 dBA.
a) What SLC80 value is required for the hearing
protection device, and
b) what Class rating is suitable?
University of Adelaide 70
Hearing Protection Devices
Answer
• The required SLC80 value is:
SLC 𝐿 , , 𝐿 , 100 80 20 dB
• Hence, the required rating of the hearing protector is
a) SLC80 = 20 dB,
b) which according to Table is a Class 3 rating.
University of Adelaide 71
Hearing Protection Devices
• Degradation in effectiveness from short lapses.
If a hearing protection device is not worn, even for short
periods, the effectiveness is drastically reduced.
Example:
HPD with NR=30 dB
worn for 95% of time.
Effective NR is only
13 dB!
University of Adelaide 72
Hearing Protection Devices
Overprotection
• If a HPD is selected that has too great of NR, it can lead
to the wearer feeling isolated, cannot get auditory
feedback.
• Workers might remove their HPD, exposing them to loud
noise. (see Degradation in Effectiveness)
• Standard BS EN 458:2016 (2016) recommends that the
protected noise level when wearing hearing protection
should be between 75 and 80 dBA.
• A protected noise level less than 70 dBA is considered as
overprotection.
University of Adelaide 73
Impulsive Noise ENC5 p103
B
20 dB
E
A F
D
University of Adelaide 74
Impact Noise ENC5 p104
University of Adelaide 75
Regulations for Impact and Impulse Noise
University of Adelaide 76
Impulse Noise – US DoD
• The MIL-STD-1474E recommends the following noise
damage risk criteria (DRC) to minimise the likelihood of
permanent hearing loss:
– a total of 500 Auditory Risk Units (ARU) is the maximum
allowable ‘dose’ (within a 24 hour period) for occasional
exposures (e.g. less than once per week on average). A dose of
500 ARUs is just safe, meaning that there may be temporary
changes in hearing sensitivity of up to 25 dB, but recovery should
occur within 24 hours and no significant permanent hearing loss
is expected from the exposure. Doses greater than 500 ARUs are
predicted to produce permanent hearing loss
– For occupational exposures occurring more regularly (i.e. on
average, daily or near daily), the limit should be reduced to 200
ARUs (within a 24 hour period) to reduce the likelihood of
permanent hearing loss.
Peter Teague, James Conomos and Vasos Alexandrou (2016), “Developments in the Description and Assessment of High
Intensity Impulse Noise Exposure”, Proceedings of Acoustics 2016, Australian Acoustical Society Conference.
University of Adelaide 77
One method …
See follow page for graph of suggested limits. (Rice, 1974).
– Equivalent to a continuous exposure to LAeq,8h = 90 dBA for an eight-
hour period.
– The same curve can be used for an allowed exposure level of LAeq,8h =
85 dBA. In this case, the solid curve is shifted down by 5 dBA.
The equivalent noise exposure corresponding to a particular B-
duration multiplied by the number of impacts or impulses, and a
corresponding peak pressure level may be calculated using
Figure 2.21. The first step is to calculate the product of the impulse
or impact B-duration and number of impulses (impacts). This value
is entered on the x-axis of Figure 2.21 and a vertical line is drawn
until it intersects the appropriate curve. For impulse noise of less
than 1000 impulses per exposure the upper curve is used, while for
impact noise the lower curve is used. From the point of intersection
of the appropriate curve and the vertical line, a horizontal line is
drawn to intersect the y-axis at the value of peak sound level
corresponding to an exposure level of LAeq,8h = 90 dBA.
Rice, C. G. (1974). Damage risk criteria for impulse and impact noise. In Crisp, J. D. C., editor, Noise Shock and
Vibration Conference Proceedings, pages 29–38. Institution of Engineers, Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Vic,
University of Adelaide 78
Impulse and Impact Damage Risk
8‐hour 90 dB(A) equivalent
180
Peak sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
impulse
170
160
150
140 5 dB / doubling
steady state
130
120
110
100 impact and steady state (equal energy)
90
8-hour 90 dB(A)
equivalent
0.1 1 2 5
10 5
10 2 5
10 3 5
10 4 105 5
10 6 5
107 5
10 8 5
10 9
B-duration x number of impulses (ms)
ENC5 p105
University of Adelaide 79
Impulse and Impact Damage Risk
8‐hour 85 dB(A) equivalent
180
Peak sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
170 impulse
160
150
140
5 dB / doubling
130 steady state
120
110
100 impact and steady state (equal energy)
90 8-hour 85 dB(A)
equivalent
0.1 1 2 5
10 5
10 2 5
10 3 5
10 4 10 5 5
10 6 5
10 7 5
10 8 5
10 9
University of Adelaide 81
Answer
• Number of impacts per day
𝑁 80 60 8 0.6 23,040
• B-duration 𝐵 100 milliseconds
• B-duration × number of impacts 𝐵𝑁 2.3 10
• Peak SPL = 125dB
University of Adelaide 83
Answer
180
impulse
160
150
140 5 dB / doubling
steady state
130
𝐿 121 dB 120
𝐿 112.5 dB 110
2 5 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9
0.1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
B-duration x number of impulses (ms)
𝐵𝑁 2.3 10
University of Adelaide 84
Answer DND
no.of impacts
allowed number
⁄
European Criteria 2
Allowable level: 𝐿 112.5 dB, but the press makes
Lpeak=125 dB, so it is louder than allowed.
⁄ . ⁄
Noise dose DND 2 =2 18
USA Criteria
Allowable level: 𝐿 120.5 dB
⁄ . ⁄
Noise dose DND 2 =2 1.9
160
150
140 5 dB / doubling
steady state
130
𝐿 125 dB
120
110
2 5 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9
0.1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
B-duration x number of impulses (ms)
𝐵𝑁 1.4 10 𝐵𝑁 1.29 10
University of Adelaide 86
no.of impacts
DND
Answer allowed number
⁄
2
• Allowable BN for peak level 𝐿 125 dB
and calculate noise dose
European Criteria
Allowable 𝐵𝑁 1.4 10 , as 𝐵 100, 𝑁 1.4 10
no.of impacts
Noise dose DND 16.4
allowed number .
USA Criteria
Allowable 𝐵𝑁 1.294 10 , as 𝐵 100, 𝑁 1.29 10
no.of impacts
Noise dose DND 1.78
allowed number .
University of Adelaide 87
Answer
Required work day decrease
European Criteria
Assuming that the press accounts entirely for the exposure of the
employee, then from ENC5 fig 2.21 p105, the allowed BN product is
𝐵𝑁 1.4 10
as 𝐵 100, the number of allowed impacts is 𝑁 1.4 10
Calculate the impact noise duration in terms of hours.
1.4 10 impacts 1
0.29 hours
80 impacts /min 60 min⁄hr
What this means is that 0.29 hours of press operation will “consume” the
entire 90 dBA 8-hour exposure limit. But there is also background noise of
85 dB A during the 8-hour shift, so the time the press can operate has to
be less than 0.29 hours. … but how much less?
University of Adelaide 88
Answer
• If the press operates for 0.29 hr, then background noise
occurs for 8-0.29=7.71 hrs.
The DND for 85 dB(A) over 8 hours would be
⁄ ⁄
𝐷𝑁𝐷 2 , 2 0.315
but, this exposure is only occurring for 7.71 hours, so the
DND is
7.71 ⁄
𝐷𝑁𝐷 2 0.3
8
So, we need to reduce the time the press operates to (1-
0.3=) 70% of orig time, to permit the background noise:
1 0.3 0.29 0.2 hours
Hence the reduction in hours of the press is 8 60%
0.2 4.6 hours reduction.
University of Adelaide 89
Answer - Double check
• We think
– 70% of DND consumed from 0.2 hr press operation
– 30% of DND from 7.8 hr of background noise at 85 dB(A)
• So press noise BN is
𝐵𝑁 100 0.2 60 80 100 960 96,000
• Draw peak level 𝐿 125 dB, and BN=96,000, on graph,
point is about 3 dB below curve for 90 dB(A)-8hr.
Hence LAeq = 87 dB(A). Good, provides some allowance for
contribution of background noise.
Worked out equivalent Lp:
1 ⁄ ⁄
𝐿 , 10 log 𝑡 10 𝑡 10
8
1 ⁄
87 10 log 0.2 10
8
𝐿 103 dB A
⁄
• So the total exposure is 𝐿 , 10 log 7.8 10
0.2 10 ⁄ 89 dB A safe
University of Adelaide 90
Answer
180
Peak sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
3dB
impulse
170
160
150
140 5 dB / doubling
steady state
130
120
110
100 impact and steady state (equal energy)
90
8-hour 90 dB(A)
equivalent
0.1 1 2 5
10 5
10 2 5
10 3 5
10 4 105 5
10 6 5
107 5
10 8 5
10 9
B-duration x number of impulses (ms)
University of Adelaide 91
Answer
180
Peak sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
3dB
impulse
170
160
150
140 5 dB / doubling
steady state
130
120
110
100 impact and steady state (equal energy)
90
8-hour 90 dB(A)
equivalent
0.1 1 2 5
10 5
10 2 5
10 3 5
10 4 105 5
10 6 5
107 5
10 8 5
10 9
B-duration x number of impulses (ms)
University of Adelaide 92
Speech Interference Criteria
• There are important frequency ranges for oral
communication. (see table on next page)
• Background noise level can make it difficult to
understand speech.
• Speech level of a talker depends on the talker’s subjective
response to the level of the background noise.
– If you go to a loud nightclub, you raise your voice to be
communicate with your friends.
ENC5 p115
University of Adelaide 93
Speech Interference Criteria
Table 2.13. Significant frequency ranges for speech communication
ENC5 p115
Approximate frequency
range (Hz)
Range of hearing 16 to 20,000
Speech range 200 to 6,000
Speech intelligibility 500 to 4,000
(containing the frequencies most necessary for
understanding speech)
Speech privacy range
(containing speech sounds which intrude most 250 to 2,500
objectionably into adjacent areas)
Male voice (peak frequency of energy output) 350
Female voice (peak frequency of energy output) 700
University of Adelaide 94
Speech Interference Criteria
• See chart (next page) in ANSI S12.65-2006 - For Rating
Noise with Respect to Speech Interference.
• Originally devised from measurements outdoors for
speech communication.
• Curves for four voice levels are shown: normal, raised,
very loud, and shout.
• The shaded triangular region shows the range of
expected voice levels due to the normal raising of one's
voice in noisy surroundings
University of Adelaide 98
Speech Interference Criteria
16
8
Distance in metres
0.5
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dB re 20 Pa)
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
A-weighted level (dB(A))
See also ANSI S12.65‐2006, page 4 ENC5 p115
University of Adelaide 99
Speech Interference Level Speech Interference Criteria
H.Lazarus, (1987), “Prediction of verbal communication in noise – A development of generalized SIL curves and the quality
of communication,” Applied Acoustics, 20, p245‐261, 21, 325.
y
m l o ut i fi
ai
8 al ed
s
ud
ed
vo
Distance in metres
4 ic
e
li m
Ex it
2 pe
ct
ed
Vo
1 ice
Le
ve
0.5 l
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dB re 20 Pa)
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
A-Weighted level (dB(A))
ENC5 p127
University of Adelaide 113
Speech Privacy
• To avoid speech privacy problems:-
– Use partitions or separation walls with an adequate sound
insulation (see Table).
– Ensure that there are no air gaps between the partitions and the
permanent walls and floor
– Ensure that the partitions extend all the way to the ceiling, roof
or the underside of the next floor
– Ensure that acoustic tiles with absorption coefficients of at least
0.1 to 0.4 are used for the suspended ceiling to reduce the
reverberant sound level in the office spaces, and also to increase
the overall noise reduction of sound transmitted from one office
to another.
Conference room 35
Office 40
Workshop office, rest room 45
Laboratory, measurement or inspection room 50
Canteen 50
Changing room 55
Repair workshop 60
Production areas 75
Fan room, compressor room etc. normally unmanned 90
ENC5 p120
University of Adelaide 121
Noise Criteria (NC) Curves ENC5 p120
• A number of problems
– do not account for low frequency rumble noise
– too permissive at 2000 Hz and higher
– do not correlate well with subjective response to air con noise
NC Curves
(NC)
70
65
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
MAF 15
10
0
63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
ENC5 p121 Octave band centre frequency (Hz)
See Beranek and Ver (2006), Noise and Vibration Control Engineering, 2nd ed., p895.
University of Adelaide 129
Room Criteria (RC) Curves
90
80 A
Room Criterion (RC) curves.
Octave band sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
45
30 40
35
20 30
25
10
16 31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
Octave band center frequency (Hz)
ENC5 p122
University of Adelaide 130
RC Rating
• RC rating = average of the 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz octave
band sound levels.
• If any octave band level below 500Hz exceeds the RC curve by more
than 5 dB, noise is denoted "rumbly" (e.g. RC 29(R)).
• If any octave band level above 500Hz exceeds the RC curve by more
than 3 dB, noise is denoted, "hissy". (e.g. RC 29(H)).
• If neither of the above occurs, the noise is denoted "neutral" (e.g. RC
29(N)).
• If the sound pressure levels in any band between and including 16
Hz to 63 Hz lie in the cross hatched regions, perceptible vibration
can occur in the walls and ceiling and rattles can occur in furniture.
In this case, the noise is identified with "RV" (e.g. RC 29(RV)).
• RC curves are suitable for specifying the introduction of acoustic
"perfume", and noise with a spectrum of that shape has been found
to be the least objectionable.
RC 35
Yes, moderate
probability.
Specification
dB(A) NR NC NCB Comment
• rough guide only - exact relationship depends upon frequency spectrum of noise
NR=40
NR=35
See also “A Comparison Of Tonal Noise Regulations In Australia” Tom Evans, Jon Cooper,
Australian Acoustical Society AAS 2015 Conference, Hunter Valley, NSW.
https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/AAS2015/papers/p82.pdf
University of Adelaide 145
Impulsivity
• AS 1055 (2018) describes sounds (LpAF) that increase in
level by more 10 dB / s as impulsive.
– LpAF = A-weighted, Fast time response on SLM.
ENC5 p132
Psychoacoustics
Course Content – Where Are We?
TOPIC
The Ear
16 A
N Ve S m
or ry ho pli
R
m l o ut
ais
8 al fi e
ud d
ed
vo
Distance in metres
ic
4 e
Criteria
li m
Ex it
2 pe
ct
ed
Vo
1 i ce
Le
ve
0.5 l
0.25
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Speech interference level (dBre 20 Pa)
Psychoacoustics
positive
pdipole
Sound Sources
a
d/2 r
d/2
negative
Sound Power
University of Adelaide 2
Contents
• Introduction
• Loudness
• Pitch
• Masking
• Critical bands, bandwidth, and rate
• Sharpness
• Roughness
• Binaural hearing
• Annoyance
• Jury testing
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
• Understand the psychoacoustic terms and able to
calculate the metrics for loudness, pitch, critical bands
bandwidth rate, sharpness, roughness, annoyance.
• Understand the concept of masking.
University of Adelaide 4
Many processes involved in hearing
http://www.yamahaproaudio.com/global/en/training_support/selftraining/audio_quality
/chapter4/03_auditory/
University of Adelaide 5
Questions to Think About
• How is it possible to describe the characteristics of a
sound?
• Although two sounds have the same loudness, they can
sound completely different. How do you differentiate
between the sounds?
• What constitutes a pleasant and appealing sound?
• What is meant by “sound quality” ?
– The term “quality” can have several interpretations.
University of Adelaide 6
Introduction
Example applications of psychoacoustics:
• Acoustic trickery
– False bass, virtual pitch, pitch circularity
• Assessment of loudness
– Actual measured sound level and perceived loudness
• Sound quality:
– Would do consumers consider as sounding “good”
• Localisation - where is that sound coming from?
• Hearing aids – speech intelligibility in noisy environments
• Sound design:
– what is an appropriate sound for taking a picture with a camera?
• Speech intelligibility:
– Intelligible announcements in airports, tunnels, stadiums, etc.
University of Adelaide 7
Acoustic Trickery
• False Bass
– If the fundamental is removed, your brain fills in the missing
fundamental.
– Used in products for bass enhancement.
– Visual analogy:
University of Adelaide 8
The Effect of the MaxxBass
Psychoacoustic Bass Enhancement
System on Loudspeaker Design
University of Adelaide 9
The Effect of the MaxxBass Psychoacoustic Bass Enhancement System on Loudspeaker Design
University of Adelaide 10
False Bass
Loudspeakers Duntech PCL-10
SRS WOW
software bass enhancement
http://www.dts.com/audioessentials/
Included in Windows Media Player
MaxxBass by Waves
http://www.waves.com/plugins/maxxbass
University of Adelaide 11
• SRS 3D: SRS Labs calls this "wide stereo imaging and non-
fatiguing headphone listening mode." In English, it breaks
down like this: When you're listening to headphones, the
sweet spot is actually in the center of your head. SRS 3D
widens this area of sound so that the music isn't so
concentrated in one small spot and makes it sound more as if
you were listening in an open environment.
• TruBass: "Psychoacoustic bass enhancement to enable
deeper, natural bass of audio source material to be perceived
over small speaker drivers." This one's my favorite.
Essentially, TruBass uses acoustic trickery to make your brain
believe that you are hearing bass that is actually in the song
but that the hardware (usually headphones) is incapable of
creating.
https://www.cnet.com/news/srs‐labs‐wow‐technology‐explained/
University of Adelaide 13
Introduction
• Psychoacoustics is a whole course in itself!
University of Adelaide 14
Introduction
References
• Hugo Fastl and Eberhard Zwicker (2007),
“Psychoacoustics Facts and Models,”
Springer, 3rd edition.
Free access to e-book at:
• http://adelaide.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/SUA:ALMA51139397530001811
• http://link.springer.com.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/book/10.1007/978-3-
540-68888-4/page/1
• All audio files are on MyUni.
University of Adelaide 15
Introduction
References
• Online courses
http://clas.mq.edu.au/perception/psychoacoustics/chapter2.html
• Psysound3: free Matlab toolbox
http://psysound.wikidot.com/
• ISO 532:2017 Acoustics -- Methods for calculating loudness
– Part 1: Zwicker method
– Part 2: Moore-Glasberg method
– Software to calculate loudness
https://standards.iso.org/iso/532/-1/ed-1/en
University of Adelaide 16
Loudness
• We can measure sound pressure levels with a SLM,
but how does this correspond with
the human perception of loudness?
University of Adelaide 17
Loudness
Sound Level Meter Loudness Meter
dB(A) sone
110 120
Jack hammer
100 Jack hammer passing motorcycle
trumpet passing motorcycle 100
lawn mower 90
electric drill violin
church bells 80 highway 80
urban road noise commuter train
atmosphere in a pub
lawn mower
normal converation 70 trumpet
electric drill 60
60 bird twitter violin
highway
quiet creek 50 40 church bells
commuter train urban road noise
ticking clock atmosphere in a pub
40
20 normal converation
30 trickling tap
quiet creek bird twitter
20 ticking clock 0 trickling tap
University of Adelaide 18
Loudness
• Subjective effect of changes in sound pressure level.
University of Adelaide 21
Loudness
Audio Demonstrations:
Track 33: Loudness as a function of burst duration
In this demonstration, the dependence of loudness on
duration is illustrated. You will hear pairs of 3kHz tones
(60 dB), the first tone of a pair is always 1000ms long, the
second tone will get progressively shorter. Each pair is
presented twice.
University of Adelaide 23
Loudness
University of Adelaide 24
Loudness
• How is loudness determined?
– Still use a microphone and instrumentation to measure
amplitude and frequency, but use a different scale (metric) based
on the type of sound.
• Read Zwicker and Fastl, p317, Section 16.1.1.
• Also described in ENC5 p74, Section 2.3.2, but needs to
be updated!
University of Adelaide 25
Loudness
• Controversy! - several methods to calculate loudness:
– ANSI S3.4-2007, ISO 226:2003, ISO 532: 1975
– ISO 532: 2017 Part 1 – Zwicker method
– ISO 532: 2017 Part 2 - Moore-Glasberg method
• Each of the two ISO standards published in 2017 uses a
different method to calculate loudness and the results
from the application of each method can be significantly
different.
However, the committee responsible for the two
standards could not agree on which method is more
appropriate so they developed a standard for each
method!
University of Adelaide 26
Loudness
For Single Tonal Noise ONLY
Tonal sound
120 phons
• Equal loudness
University of Adelaide 28
Loudness For Single Tonal Noise ONLY
120 phons
Sound presure level (dB re 20 :Pa)
100
100
90
80
80
70
60
60
50
40
40
30
20 Threshold 20
of hearing 10
(MAF)
0
10 100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
University of Adelaide 29
Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones
Same as previous under free-field listening conditions
graph, shown in 130
1/3 octave bands 120
110
100 phon
See ISO 226:2003 100
90
90
31.5
63
125
250
500
1,000
2,000
4,000
8,000
16,000
Frequency (Hz)
University of Adelaide 30
Loudness
• We said before that:
University of Adelaide 31
Loudness
University of Adelaide 32
Loudness ENC5 (updated‐errata) Fig 2.13(a), p80
Loudness, S (sones)
𝑃 40
log 2
Valid for 𝑃 40 to 100 1
Above 100 phons,
subjective loudness
increases less rapidly
0.1
due to saturation
Below 40 phons,
opposite occurs.
0.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Loudness level, P (phons)
University of Adelaide 33
Loudness
• Calculating the total loudness for broadband sounds is
complicated, since release of updated standards.
– Previously, could use simple methods in ENC4, ENC5.
– Updated standards mean a computer program has to be used.
Hence, not easy to “teach” and hand-calculation methods.
– See ISO standards software to calculate loudness:
https://standards.iso.org/iso/532/-1/ed-1/en
University of Adelaide 35
Loudness
130
Loudness index
120 S (sones)
150
Band sound pressure level (dB re 20 Pa)
110
100
80
100 60
50
40
90 30
25
20
80 15
12
10
70 8
6
60 5
4
3
50 2.5
2
1.5
40
1.0
30 0.7
0.5
0.3
20 0.2
0.1
10
31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k
One-third octave band centre frequency (Hz) ENC4 Fig 2.10(b), p91.
(b) ENC5 Fig 2.13(b), p80.
University of Adelaide 36
Example ENC5, p80.
University of Adelaide 37
Example
1. Enter the band levels in row 1 of the table, calculated using
Fig 2.10(b). Read the loudness indices Si and write them in
row 2.
2. Rank the indices as shown in row 3.
3. Determine loudness level (SONES) for each band using Eq.
(2.33) where B = 0.3 (octaves) or 0.15 (1/3 octaves)
University of Adelaide 40
Example
… we get this for row 2.
Row Octave band centre 31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
frequencies (Hz)
1 Band level (dB re 20 μPa) 57 58 60 65 75 80 75 70 65
2 Band loudness index (sones) 0.8 1.3 2.5 4.6 10 17 14 13 11
3 Ranking 9 8 7 6 5 1 2 3 4
University of Adelaide 41
Example
2. Rank the indices, as shown in row 3.
Row Octave band centre 31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
frequencies (Hz)
1 Band level (dB re 20 μPa) 57 58 60 65 75 80 75 70 65
2 Band loudness index (sones) 0.8 1.3 2.5 4.6 10 17 14 13 11
3 Ranking 9 8 7 6 5 1 2 3 4
University of Adelaide 42
Example
3. Determine loudness level (SONES) for each band using
Eq. (2.33) where B = 0.3 (octaves) or 0.15 (1/3 octaves)
L S max B ' Si sones ‘ means don’t include the
max value in sum again!
i
L 17 0.3 57.2 34 sones
Row Octave band centre 31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
frequencies (Hz)
1 Band level (dB re 20 μPa) 57 58 60 65 75 80 75 70 65
2 Band loudness index (sones) 0.8 1.3 2.5 4.6 10 17 14 13 11
3 Ranking 9 8 7 6 5 1 2 3 4
University of Adelaide 43
Example
4. Enter the loudness
(34 sones) in the
scale on the left of
Fig 2.10(a), and
read loudness on
the right, as 91
phons.
OR ….
P 40 33.323 log10 L
40 33.323 log10 34
91 phons
University of Adelaide 44
Pitch
• Range:
– Lowest frequency a person with normal hearing can identify is
about 20Hz.
– Highest, normal hearing about 18kHz. Acute hearing 20kHz.
University of Adelaide 45
Pitch
University of Adelaide 49
Pitch – Autotune Demo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGiaAiIELME
University of Adelaide 50
Masking Demo
Track 9: Pure tones masked by white noise
In this demonstration a pure tone is masked by white noise.
The tone has a frequency of 500Hz, the white noise has an
overall level of 63dB.
You will hear six presentations, each with triplets of pure
tones, masked by white noise.
Write down numbers 1 to 6.
If you hear the tone, write a Y/N beneath the number.
1 2 3 4 5 6
University of Adelaide 51
Masking Demo
The level of the tone triplets is (in this order)
51dB, 37dB, 46dB, 34dB, 43dB, 40dB
Except for the second (37 dB) and fourth triplet
(34 dB), the tones are above masked threshold and
should be audible.
University of Adelaide 52
Masking Effects Of Tonal Sound
ENC5 p72
University of Adelaide 55
Remember this slide from topic
on Human Hearing
Masking
Resonance
Stapes
Schematic of Oval Window
Helicotrema
cochlea (unrolled) Round
Window
ENC5 p73
University of Adelaide 57
Critical Bands
• Our hearing system analyses a broad spectrum into parts
that correspond to critical bands.
• Zwicker (1961) proposed dividing the frequency scale
into bands called “Bark”
(in memory of Barkhausen, a scientist who introduced
the “phon”, a value describing loudness level for which
the critical band plays an important role).
• The audible frequency range to 16 kHz can be subdivided
into 24 abutting critical bands.
(See handout notes for the scale.)
University of Adelaide 58
Critical‐band rate z (in Barks), lower (F lower Hz) and upper (F upper Hz) frequency limit of critical
bandwidths, ∆f G (Hz), centred at (F centre Hz)
F_lower, F_lower,
Bark F_upper F_centre z ∆f G Bark F_upper F_centre z ∆f G
0 0 12 1720
50 0.5 100 1850 12.5 280
1 100 13 2000
150 1.5 100 2150 13.5 320
2 200 14 2320
250 2.5 100 2500 14.5 380
3 300 15 2700
350 3.5 100 2900 15.5 450
4 400 16 3150
450 4.5 110 3400 16.5 550
5 510 17 3700
570 5.5 120 4000 17.5 700
6 630 18 4400
700 6.5 140 4800 18.5 900
7 770 19 5300
840 7.5 150 5800 19.5 1100
8 920 20 6400
1000 8.5 160 7000 20.5 1300
9 1080 21 7700
1170 9.5 190 8500 21.5 1800
10 1270 22 9500
1370 10.5 210 10500 22.5 2500
11 1480 23 12000
1600 11.5 240 13500 23.5 3500
12 1720 24 15500
59
1850 12.5 280
Critical Bands
The concept of critical bands was proposed by Fletcher. He
assumed that the part of a noise that is effective in masking a test
tone is the part of its spectrum lying near the tone.
In order to gain not only relative values but also absolute values,
the following additional assumption was made:
• masking is achieved when the power of the tone and the
power of that part of the noise spectrum lying near the tone
and producing the masking effect are the same;
• parts of the noise outside the spectrum near the test tone do
not contribute to masking.
Characteristic frequency bands defined in this way have a
bandwidth that produces the same acoustic power in the tone
and in the noise spectrum within that band when the tone is just
masked.
University of Adelaide 60
Critical Band Demo 1
• Critical Bandwidth is the frequency separation
needed between two frequencies in order for a difference
in pitch to be perceived.
– Two frequencies must be at least one critical bandwidth apart.
www.sfu.ca/sonic‐studio/handbook/Sound/Critical_Band.aiff
University of Adelaide 61
Critical Band Demo 2
Track 10: Pure tones masked by narrow-band noise
The masked threshold of pure tones masked by critical-
band wide noise (1 kHz, 70 dB) is illustrated. You will hear
three series of tone triplets:
the first series is played at a level of 75 dB,
the second at a level of 60 dB,
the third at a level of 40 dB.
Each series consists of six tone triplets with the frequencies:
600 Hz, 800 Hz, 1000 Hz, 1300 Hz, 1700 Hz, and 2300 Hz.
University of Adelaide 62
Critical Band Demo 2
• Write down these freqs and Y/N if you can hear the tone.
[ 7 cols x 4 rows ]
60dB
40dB
University of Adelaide 63
Critical Band Demo 2
• In the second series the third tone triplet at 1000 Hz is
masked by the narrow-band noise,
• In the third series the third and fourth triplet at 1000 Hz
and 1300 Hz (for some persons also the fifth triplet at
1700 Hz) are masked.
University of Adelaide 64
Critical Band
University of Adelaide 65
Critical Band
University of Adelaide 66
Critical Bandwidth
• Plot of the critical centre frequency and the bandwidth
looks like:
University of Adelaide 67
Critical Band Rate
University of Adelaide 68
Critical Band Rate
• To convert frequency to Bark (Fastl Eq. 6.1, p164)
𝑓
𝑧 Bark 13arctan 0.00076𝑓 3.5 arctan
7500
• Critical Bandwidth
University of Adelaide 69
Sharpness
• See Chapt 9 Fastl and Zwicker (2007).
• Most important parameters are:
– Spectral content
– Centre frequency of narrow-band sounds.
• DIN 45692 Measurement technique for the simulation of
the auditory sensation of sharpness
University of Adelaide 70
Sharpness Demonstration
• Should hear increasing
sharpness …
– Narrow Band noise centred
at 1 kHz
Track 34
University of Adelaide 71
Sharpness: Demonstration 2
Noise Type Sharp Not Sharp
Broadband
Tonal
http://www.salford.ac.uk/computing‐science‐
engineering/research/acoustics/psychoacoustics/sound‐quality‐making‐products‐
sound‐better/sound‐quality‐testing/sharpness‐booming
University of Adelaide 73
Sharpness
University of Adelaide 74
Sharpness
• Calculated as
Bark
𝑁 g z z dz
𝑆 0.11 acum Eq (9.1), p242
Bark Fastl & Zwicker
𝑁 dz
Bark
Eq (8.1), p221
𝑁 𝑁 dz Fastl & Zwicker
University of Adelaide 75
Sharpness
• …. continued
University of Adelaide 76
Roughness
University of Adelaide 78
Roughness
University of Adelaide 80
Roughness Demo
Each sound is presented with modulation frequencies of
20 Hz, 70 Hz and 200 Hz.
University of Adelaide 81
Binaural Hearing
University of Adelaide 82
Binaural Hearing
• Localization
– Ability to determine origin of sound in 3D.
– Inversions can occur: a sound source is situated in front of the
subject but a subject perceives the sound as coming from behind.
For example: if the subject faces the direction 0 and the sound
source is presented at an angle of 30 , the sound may be
perceived at an angle of 150. This means that the sound source
is situated in front of the subject somewhat to the right, but that
the sound is perceived as coming from a position behind the
subject.
University of Adelaide 83
Binaural Hearing
• Localization
– Some sources always sound like they are originating from a
particular direction.
University of Adelaide 84
Binaural Hearing
Cone of confusion
• A sound source on the surface of an imaginary cone
cannot easily be localised because of similar
Interaural Time Differences and
Interaural Level Differences.
University of Adelaide 85
Annoyance
• Depends on many factors
Pedersen and Waye (2004), ”Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine
noise—a dose–response relationship”, JASA
University of Adelaide 86
Annoyance
where
N hearing sensations loudness
S sharpness
F fluctuation strength
R roughness
University of Adelaide 87
Annoyance
• As an example (Eq. 16.2)
where
N5 is the percentile loudness is sone
𝑆 𝑁
𝑤 1.75 0.25 log 10 for 𝑆 1.75 acum
acum sone
University of Adelaide 88
Annoyance
• Example: Car sounds (Fig 16.15, Psychoacoustic
annoyance of car sounds Dots: Data from psychoacoustic
experiments. Crosses: PA value
University of Adelaide 90
In regards to ‘rating schemes’ Ted Schultz says
“it is an unhappy fact that the studies reviewed by Fidell and Schultz present a
carnival of figures, from which arguments can be concocted to suit almost any beliefs
about time-of-day weighting factors. Order can be imposed on the sleep,
communication interference, and annoyance data only by the most strenuous,
artificial, and single-minded of efforts. It is therefore unrewarding to attempt to justify
a time-of-day weighting factor exclusively on the basis of scientific evidence of noise
effects.”
University of Adelaide 91
Sound Quality in Product Design
• For example, the new BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe is
“a sporty car, so the door isn’t supposed to sound too
heavy. It can’t sound too light, because a light door
wouldn’t convey the right aspects of quality and safety.
But it’s not supposed to sound too heavy, either. It
should have a precise sound.”
• By contrast, “the BMW 7 Series would be a bit softer
maybe, a bit darker in the sound as it’s our flagship
sedan.”
University of Adelaide 92
Sound Quality in Product Design
Final Prototype
Freq
Time Time
University of Adelaide 93
Sound Quality Checking for Defects
• Sound quality can also be used for production
manufacturing quality to ensure there are no defects.
• Example of checking for defective side mirror
mechanisms.
University of Adelaide 94
Sound Quality Checking for Defects
• Good • Defective
Cepstrum of Arm 7 −− Subjectively BAD
Cepstrum of Arm 15 −− Subjectively GOOD 0
0
Unfiltered− Total=−5.02dB
Unfiltered− Total=−19.37dB −5 Band Pass 3.0kHz−4.6kHz
−5 Band Pass 3.0kHz−4.6kHz Points used in tally
Points used in tally −10
−10
−15
Power (dB)
−15
Power (dB)
−20
−20
−25
−25
−30
−30
−35
−35
−40
−40 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Quefrency (s)
Quefrency (s)
0
−0.5
−0.5
−1
−1
−1.5
−1.5
−2
−2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Time (s)
Time (s)
University of Adelaide 95
Jury Testing
• Used extensively to evaluate consumer response of sound
made by products.
• Play sample sounds, either real or synthesized, to an
audience, under very controlled conditions, and obtain
subjective responses.
University of Adelaide 96
Summary
• There are many useful psychoacoustic terms for
characterising sounds.
• These terms have metrics (values) that can be used to
compare sounds.
• The metrics can be combined into a weighted sum to give
a value of annoyance or pleasantness.
• Determining the appropriate weighting factors usually
often involves doing jury testing.
University of Adelaide 97
Carl Howard
Sound Sources
Course Content – How it fits
Where are we going?
Need to know about TOPIC
sources and power positive
a
pdipole
d/2
r
negative
Sound Power
y Sound Source
Receiver
• Outdoor sound
Outdoor
propagation
University of Adelaide 2
Sound Sources
• Need for simple acoustic source models
University of Adelaide 3
Sound Sources
• A complex acoustic system can be modelled accurately by
combining a number of simple sound sources
(monopoles, dipoles, quadrupoles)
m=monopole,
d=dipole
University of Adelaide 4
Contents
• Monopoles, dipoles and quadrupoles
• Line sources
• Baffled piston
• Coherent and incoherent plane sources
• Directivity and reflection effects
• Plane wave reflection and transmission
University of Adelaide 5
Learning Outcomes
• Understand and apply theory for the various acoustic
source types.
• Be able to select an acoustic source type to represent a
real noise source.
University of Adelaide 6
Resources
Lots of good resources on the internet about acoustic
sources.
See
• http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos/rad2/mdq.html
• http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Publications/MDQSources.pdf
• http://resource.isvr.soton.ac.uk/spcg/tutorial/tutorial/Tutorial_file
s/Web-further-dipoles.htm
• http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/waves-sound/
University of Adelaide 7
Categories
• Fluctuating volume/mass
displacement/injection
• Accelerating/fluctuating force
on fluid
University of Adelaide 8
What we’ll cover
d/2 r
pplane Plane wave
r in free field
d/2
a
Plane wave
negative in ducts
University of Adelaide 9
What we’ll cover
• Line Source
• Baffled Piston
y
p(r, )
Infinite
plane
baffle r Circular piston
of radius a
x
University of Adelaide 10
What we’ll cover
• Directivity of sources
Beam Pattern of a Baffled Circular Piston
0o0 dB
-30o 30o
-10
-20
-60o 60o
-30
-40
-90o 90o
Directivity Pattern
Pressure Nulls
University of Adelaide 11
What we’ll cover
University of Adelaide 12
Sound Source Types and Sound Power
• MONOPOLES - power U4
– where U is the velocity
– engine exhaust
– cavitation noise
• DIPOLES - power U6
– spoiler and grille noise
– valve noise (fluctuating forces on fluid boundaries)
• QUADRUPOLES - power U8
– valve noise (turbulence alone)
– jet noise
University of Adelaide 13
Monopole
pmonopole
a r
• Expanding rigid sphere
• Radiates equally in all direction.
pback
• A loudspeaker in a sealed r
enclosure at low frequencies is
similar to monopole. 2a
University of Adelaide 14
Simple Source
• Monopole
– Radiates equally in all directions
pmonopole
a r
http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos/rad2/mdq.html
University of Adelaide 15
Monopole
• Sub-woofers are used to generate low frequency bass.
• As shown, the sound field is omni-directional.
• What this means is that you can place and point them
anywhere in a room!
University of Adelaide 16
Monopoles
17
Two Monopoles in Phase
• Superposition two monopoles.
18
Monopoles
• A linear array of monopoles
19
Monopoles
• Ring of monopoles can simulate another monopole in
the far-field.
20
Monopoles
• Can create complex acoustic fields
21
Monopole
• An important concept to understand is
VOLUME VELOCITY
Velocity of cone
Volume velocity =
Area x Velocity
Area of speaker cone
University of Adelaide 22
Simple Source
(monopole or pulsating sphere)
• spherical wave potential function
φ = f ct r / r
φ
p=ρ =cf ' ct r / r
t
φ
u= = f ct r +rf ' ct r / r 2
r
T T
1 ρc
I= pu dt= ff '+ rf ' f ' / r 3 dt
T 0 T 0
Note: f ' w= f w
w
Require:
2
W= I dS = I 4πr = constant
S
T
1
and I ρc f ' f ' / r
2
thus: T
0
ff ' dt = 0
University of Adelaide 23
Simple Source (Cont.)
1
𝑢 𝑓𝑓 2𝑟𝑓𝑓′ 𝑟 𝑓′𝑓′ 𝑑𝑡 𝑓𝑓 ⁄𝑎 𝑓′𝑓′ ⁄𝑎
𝑇𝑟
University of Adelaide 24
Simple Source (Cont.)
• For pure tone or narrow band of noise
f f = f ' f ' / k2 as f ct r = e jk ct r and f ' jkf
Thus
Q rms = 4 f f f ' f ' a 2
Q rms = 4π
f ' f ' 1 + k 2a 2 / k
• Intensity of a monopole
𝑄 = RMS volume velocity 𝑚 ⁄𝑠
𝑄 𝑘 𝜌𝑐 𝑝 𝑎 = radius of source (m)
𝐼 𝑟 = distance from source (m)
4𝜋𝑟 1 𝑘 𝑎 𝜌𝑐 𝑘 2𝜋𝑓⁄𝑐 wavenumber (rad/m)
𝜌 = density (kg/m3)
ENC5 p174 𝑐 = speed of sound (m/s)
𝑢 = RMS velocity of surface (m/s)
University of Adelaide 25
Simple Source
• Sound Power: 𝜌𝑐𝑄 𝑘
𝑊 𝐼𝑑𝑆
ENC5 p174 4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎
𝑄 𝑘𝜌𝑐
• Sound Pressure: 𝑝
ENC5 p174 4𝜋 𝑟 1 𝑘 𝑎
𝑊 𝜌𝑐
𝑝
4𝜋 𝑟
𝑊 = sound power from monopole (W)
𝑄 = volume velocity (m3/s)
𝑘 = wavenumber 𝜔⁄𝑐 2𝜋𝑓/𝑐 (rad/m)
𝑎 = radius of source (m)
University of Adelaide 26
Dipole ENC5 p175
positive
• Two monopoles that have a pdipole
opposite phase. r
d/2
• Acoustic cancellation normal to
the axis of the dipole. d/2
negative
• An unsealed loudspeaker is - +
similar to a dipole. - +
University of Adelaide 28
Dipole Source
• Characterised by two identical monopoles, spaced a
distanced apart, where they have a 180° phase shift
between them.
• Example: unboxed loudspeaker.
pdipole
r
positive
negative
a
a
d/2
d/2
http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos/rad2/mdq.html
University of Adelaide 29
Dipole
• 2 monopoles closely spaced, 180° out of phase
• Cancels normal to axis
30
y O
source 1 r1
Dipole Source r H
h r2
x
-h
source 2
University of Adelaide 31
1
• Thus: f ' ct r f ' ct r h cos ...
r
f ' ct r f ' ct r h cos ...
2 f ' ct r h / r cos
h
p= = 2 c f ' '(ct r) cos
t r
φ 2h
u= = 2 f ' ct r +rf ' 'ct r cos θ
r r
f ' f ' k2 = f ' ' f ' ' f ' ct r jkAejk(ct-r)
University of Adelaide 32
Dipole Source
• Intensity,
ENC5 p177
𝑄 4𝜋 𝑓𝑓 𝑓′𝑓′ 𝑎
University of Adelaide 34
Dipole Source - Radiation Pattern
SPL vs Angle for
+ a Dipole Source
o
o 0 80 dB o
−30 70 30
60
50
o
−60 40 60o
30
20
o
10
o
Theory
−90 10 90 Ansys
20
30
40
−120 o
50
60 120o
70
−150 o 80 dB
o
150o
180
University of Adelaide 35
Integration Over a Spherical Surface to
Calculate Radiated Sound Power
𝑊 𝐼 𝑑𝑆 𝑑𝜓 𝐼𝑟 sin𝜃 𝑑𝜃
University of Adelaide 36
Dipole Source
• Radiated power,
ENC5 p177
ENC5 p178
38
University of Adelaide 39
Quadrupole Source
• Quadrupole ( 2 dipoles)
– Lateral Quadrupole
(2 dipoles placed next to each other)
+
‐ ‐
+
http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos/rad2/mdq.html
• Examples:
– Rotating propeller
University of Adelaide 40
Quadrupole Source
• Linear Quadrupole
(2 dipoles placed end-to-end)
• Example: Tuning fork.
+ ‐ + ‐
University of Adelaide 41
z R( x,y)
Quadrupole Source h h + r1
r
L
y
x L
2𝑘 ℎ𝐿𝑄
𝑊 𝜌𝑐 ENC5 p185
5𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎
University of Adelaide 44
Question ….
• A back-enclosed loudspeaker with a cone diameter of
10cm is radiating sound at 50Hz in a free field, and the
sound pressure level measured 2m away is
90 dB re 20Pa.
University of Adelaide 45
Answer ….
𝑊 𝜌𝑐
• What do we know… 𝑝
– SPL, so we know the pressure 4𝜋 𝑟
– We know the distance r
– We will assume c = 343
• We want to know Qpeak
𝜌𝑐 𝑄 𝑘
𝑊
4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎
4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎 𝑊
𝑄
𝜌𝑐𝑘
University of Adelaide 46
Answer …
𝑝
𝑊 𝜌𝑐 𝐿 10 log
𝑝 𝑝ref
4𝜋 𝑟
4𝜋 𝑟
𝑊 𝑝 ⁄
𝜌𝑐
⁄ 4𝜋 𝑟
𝑊 𝑝ref 10
𝜌𝑐
4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎 ⁄ 4𝜋 𝑟
𝑄 𝑝ref 10
𝜌𝑐𝑘 𝜌𝑐
University of Adelaide 47
4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎 ⁄ 4𝜋 𝑟
𝑄 𝑝ref 10
𝜌𝑐𝑘 𝜌𝑐
4𝜋 1 𝑘 𝑎 ⁄ 4𝜋 𝑟
𝑄peak 2 𝑝ref 10
𝜌𝑐𝑘 𝜌𝑐
4𝜋𝑟𝑝ref ⁄
𝑄peak 2 1 𝑘 𝑎 10
𝜌𝑐𝑘
4𝜋2 20 10 ⁄
𝑄peak 2 1 2𝜋 50⁄343 0.1⁄2 10
415 2𝜋 50⁄343
0.0592 m3 ⁄𝑠
University of Adelaide 48
Incoherent Line Source ENC5 p186
D
rn 𝑟 𝑟 𝑛𝑏 𝑑
x
u R
d
r0
𝑝 = mean square pressure (Pa2)
b
𝑛 = 0 nearest source, then +ve or –ve
integer moving further away from closest
source
𝑏 = separation between sources ( m )
𝑑 = distance from closest point on axis to
𝑊 source (m )
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 𝑟 𝑛 𝑏 𝑊 = sound power of each incoherent
4𝜋 source (W)
University of Adelaide 50
Incoherent Line Source (Cont.)
𝑊
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 𝑟 𝑛 𝑏
4𝜋
𝑊𝜋 𝑏 𝜋𝑟
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 coth
4𝑏 𝜋𝑟 𝑏
or, 𝑊
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 𝑟 𝑏⁄2 for error 0.5 dB
4𝑏𝑟
ENC5 p187
University of Adelaide 51
Incoherent Line Source (Cont.)
When close to the source, for 𝑟 𝑏⁄𝜋 , then the receiver
distance is close enough to the nearest point source, so that
only one source contributes, and the sound pressure can be
approximated as
𝑊
𝑝 𝜌𝑐
4𝜋𝑟 ENC5 p187
𝐿 𝐿 11 20 log 𝑟
University of Adelaide 52
Coherent Line Source
• assumes source radiates cylindrical
waves of surface area 2πr0bn
University of Adelaide 53
Continuous Line Sources
• radiated power expressed in terms of power per unit
source length, WL
University of Adelaide 54
Finite Length Line Source
• incoherent sources spaced b apart
x2
W ρc
p =
2
dx
x1
b 4 r 2
x1=r0 tan L , x2=r0 tan u ,
r =r0 / cos , x=r0 tan ,
dx=r0 dα sec 2
au
W cos 2 α
p =c d
2 2
2
r0 sec
or aL
b 4 πr0
𝑊
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 𝛼 𝛼ℓ ENC5 p188
4𝜋𝑟 𝑏
valid if no. of sources > 3 and 𝑟 𝑏⁄2 cos 𝛼ℓ
University of Adelaide 55
In General
• infinite number of incoherent sources in length D,
the total power, Wt
𝑊
𝑝 𝜌𝑐 𝛼 𝛼ℓ ENC5 p188
4𝜋𝑟 𝐷
• coherent source of length D
– sound pressure level will be the same as for an incoherent source
for large distances away compared with the source length.
– At distances less than D/2 away, the sound pressure level
(normal to the centre of the source) will be the same as for an
infinite coherent source.
– In between, the sound pressure level will be between the two
levels
University of Adelaide 56
Baffled Piston
y
p(r, )
Infinite
plane
baffle r Circular piston
of radius a
x
University of Adelaide 57
Baffled Piston
– Loudspeakers
University of Adelaide 58
Baffled Piston
Low frequency (ka<1) 𝑘 2𝜋𝑓 ⁄𝑐, hence 𝑘𝑎 𝑎
Radiates equally in all directions –
“omni-directional”
http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/demos/baffledpiston/baffledpiston.html
University of Adelaide 59
Baffled Piston
Medium frequency (ka>1)
Starts to become directional
University of Adelaide 60
Baffled Piston
High frequency (ka>>1)
Very directional, side lobes start to appear.
University of Adelaide 61
Baffled Piston
Axial pressure for a baffled circular piston ka=8
• If you were to
University of Adelaide 62
Baffled Piston
-20
o
-60 60o
-30
-40
-90o 90o
Directivity Pattern
Pressure Nulls
University of Adelaide 63
Piston in an Infinite Plane Baffle
• constructed as an integral
of in-phase simple
sources
A jωt -kr
φ= e
r
ENC5 p189
University of Adelaide 64
Piston Radiation (Cont.)
φ A jωt kr jkA jωt kr
u= = 2e e
r r r
φ j ck A j ωt kr
p= ρ = e
t r
Using previous simple source analysis and for kr << 1,
𝑄
𝐴
4𝜋
let r = ai be the radius of the spherical source and assume
kai < < 1
1 j𝑘𝑎 𝑄 j 𝑄
𝑢 e ej
𝑎 4𝜋 4𝜋𝑎
j𝜌𝑐𝑘𝑄 j
𝑝 𝑒
• . 4𝜋𝑟
University of Adelaide 65
Piston Radiation (Cont.)
• incremental pressure contribution from each infinitesimally
small source at observation point r0 (remembering that
Q0 2U d d ), the 2 being there due to an image source in
the baffle and rigid piston
j𝜌𝑐𝑘𝑈
d𝑝 𝜎 d𝜎 d𝜓 ej
2𝜋𝑟′
where U is the piston velocity amplitude
• Distance 𝑟 ⁄
𝑟 𝑟 𝜎 2𝑟𝜎 sin𝜃 cos𝜓
- for r >> a (far field)
𝑟′ 𝑟 𝜎sin𝜃cos𝜓
j𝜌𝑐𝑘 j
. 𝑝 𝑈e 𝜎d𝜎 𝑒j d𝜓
2𝜋𝑟
University of Adelaide 66
Piston Radiation (Cont.)
j𝜌𝑐𝑘
𝑝 𝐹 𝑤 𝑒j ENC5 p191
2𝜋𝑟
where 𝑤 𝑘𝑎 sin𝜃
J 𝑤
𝐹 𝑤 𝑈𝜋𝑎 J 𝑤 J 𝑤 𝑈𝜋𝑎 2
𝑤
and 𝐹 𝑤 ⁄ 𝑈𝜋𝑎 is plotted on the following page.
𝑝 = pressure at distance 𝑟 from piston (Pa)
𝜌 = density of medium ( kg / m3)
𝑐 = speed of sound (m / s )
𝑘 = wavenumber 𝜔⁄𝑐 2𝜋𝑓/𝑐 (rad /s)
𝑎 = radius of piston (m)
𝑟 = distance from piston to measurement loc’n (m)
𝑈 = velocity of piston (m / s)
𝜃 = angle from axis of piston to measurement loc’n (rad)
J , J , J = Bessel Function of the first kind of order 0,1,2
University of Adelaide 67
Piston Radiation
1.0
F(w)/Ua2
0.5
0
1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
w
ENC5 p192
University of Adelaide 68
Piston Radiation
• acoustic intensity in the far field is:
ka=4
ENC5 p191
ka=
The directivity plot shows
the change in radiation
pattern as the ka value
ka=/4
increases.
University of Adelaide 69
Piston Radiation
• Radiation pattern changes from
– omni-directional ka = 1
– first lobe appears about ka = 3.8
Beam Pattern of a Baffled Circular Piston
0o
0 dB
-30o 30o
-10
-20
-60o 60o
-30
-40
-90o 90o
University of Adelaide 70
Piston Near Field On-axis Sound Pressure
1
Remember previously we Theory: Pressure
said that there are pressure 0.5 Theory: Zeros
nulls on axis. 𝑘𝑎 2𝜋
0
On-axis sound pressure nulls 0 2 4 6 8
j𝜌𝑐𝑘𝑈𝑒 j𝜔 𝑡 𝑒 j𝑘 ℎ
𝐹 𝑝 𝑑𝑆 𝑟𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝜙 𝜎𝑑𝜎 𝑑𝜓
2𝜋 h
𝐹
𝑍 𝜌𝑐𝜋𝑎 𝑅 2𝑘𝑎 j𝑋 2𝑘𝑎
𝑈𝑒 ENC5 p194
University of Adelaide 72
Piston Radiation (Cont.)
rd
dr
dS
h
r a
d dS’
dy
ENC5 p194
University of Adelaide 73
Piston Radiation Impedance (Cont.)
• where 𝑧 2𝑘𝑎
𝑧 𝑧 𝑧
𝑅 𝑧 ...
2 4 2 4 6 2 4 6 8
4 𝑧 𝑧 𝑧
𝑋 𝑧 ...
𝜋 3 3 5 3 5 7
• or see graph on next page for value of 𝑅 , 𝑋
• Radiated power
1 1
𝑊 Re 𝑍 𝑈 𝜌𝑐 𝑅 𝜋𝑎 𝑈 ENC5 p194
2 2
University of Adelaide 74
Piston Radiation Impedance (Cont.)
Plotted on a
log‐log scale
𝑘 = wavenumber in rad/s
𝑎 = radius of piston in m
Solid line:
piston in an infinite baffle
(i.e. a large wall)
Dashed line:
piston at end of long tube
ENC5 p195
University of Adelaide 75
Baffled Piston
Non-dimensional Impedance
result as 1
previous page
only plotted 0.8 Real
on a linear Imaginary
scale 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Frequency Parameter (2ka)
University of Adelaide 76
Example
• Exhaust pipe with an expansion chamber silencer
radiates into an open field
Example
• Can model acoustics using ANSYS
Hemi‐anechoic domain
[should really use full sphere anechoic domain]
Straight pipe
Expansion Chamber
Acoustic source
160
140
120
100
80
60
90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Frequency [Hz]
Far Field SPL [dB] Last Mic [dB]
Incoherent Plane Radiator ENC5 p195
University of Adelaide 80
Incoherent Plane Radiator (Cont.)
• sound power Wi of each source in terms of total power,
W
𝑊 𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑧
𝑊 ENC5 p197
𝐻𝐿
University of Adelaide 81
Incoherent Plane Radiator (Cont.)
𝜌𝑐𝑊 tan 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2
𝑝
2π𝐻𝐿
𝛾 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛾
𝛾 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛾 𝛾 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛾
tan 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2
𝛾 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛾
University of Adelaide 82
Incoherent Plane Radiator (Cont.)
ENC5 p198
5
5 –1 0 1
10 10 10
r
Normalised Distance, √H L
University of Adelaide 83
Sound Radiated From Walls Of A Building
University of Adelaide 84
Source Directivity ENC5 p199
𝑊 𝐼 d𝑆
𝑊
• Mean intensity 𝐼
4𝜋𝑟
𝐼
• Directivity factor in direction (θ,ψ) 𝐷 ENC5 p199
𝐼
University of Adelaide 85
Directivity – Reflection from Surfaces
• Centre large plane
• Free Space
D=2
D=1
DI=3dB
DI=0dB
• Three Planes
• Two planes
D=8
D=4
DI=9dB
DI=6dB
University of Adelaide 88
Directivity – Reflection from Surfaces
• constant power source
Situation D DI (dB)
free space 1 0
centred in a large flat surface 2 3
centred at the edge formed by the 4 6
junction of two large flat surfaces
at the corner formed by the junction of 8 9
three large flat surfaces
𝑊 4𝜋𝑟 𝐼 ⁄𝐷
ENC5 p201
University of Adelaide 89
Source Near A Reflecting Plane
• for a simple, constant power source within 𝜆/10 of
surface or 𝑎 ≪ 𝑏
4𝜋𝑟 4𝜋𝑟 ENC5 p200
𝑊 𝐼 𝑝
𝐷 𝜌𝑐𝐷
University of Adelaide 90
Observer and Source Near a Reflecting Plane
University of Adelaide 91
Reflection and Transmission
at Interface Between 2 Media
• choice of 3 assumptions re interface
- locally reactive if f < 10-3R1
- extended reactive
- modally reactive not usually used for porous surfaces
ENC5 p228
University of Adelaide 93
• at y = 0, continuity of pressure requires that 𝑝 𝑝 𝑝
– thus, 𝐴𝑒 𝐴 𝑒 𝐴 𝑒
– and, 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴
– so, 𝐴 𝐴 𝑒 𝑒 0
– and thus, 𝑘 𝑘
𝑐 𝑘 sin 𝜓
• above result leads to Snell's Law 𝑛
𝑐 𝑘 sin 𝜃
• continuity at particle velocity at y = 0 𝑝 𝑝 𝑝
cos 𝜃 cos 𝜓
𝑍 𝑍
• use of preceding equations gives
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜓 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜓
. 𝐴 𝐴
𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍
University of Adelaide 94
• for air / earth interface
Z1 = ρc
Z2 = Zm 𝐴 𝑍 cos 𝜃 𝜌𝑐 cos 𝜓
• Reflection coefficient, Rp given by 𝑅
𝐴 𝑍 cos 𝜃 𝜌𝑐 cos 𝜓
• when , 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑍 cos𝜃 𝜌𝑐
ψ tends to zero 𝑅 ENC5 p230
𝑍 cos𝜃 𝜌𝑐
which is for a locally reactive surface
University of Adelaide 95
Representative
flow resistivity
Ground surface description
R1 (kPa s/m2)
(Harmonoise)
Very soft (snow or moss) 12.5
Soft forest floor 31.5
Uncompacted, loose ground 80
Normal uncompacted ground
200
(pastures, forest floors)
Compacted fields, lawns and gravel 500
Compacted dense ground
2,000
(gravel road, parking lot)
Asphalt, concrete 20,000
Water 200,000 ENC5 p228
University of Adelaide 96
Summary
Covered LOTS of acoustic sources types…
I bet you are surprised by the number of acoustic source types.
University of Adelaide 98
Carl Howard
Sound Power
Course Content – How it fits
We know a bit
about sound TOPIC
sources.
Now we need to positive
a
pdipole
about
d/2
Sound Power
negative
Receiver
• Outdoor sound
propagation Outdoor
University of Adelaide 2
Contents
• Effects of nearby surfaces on radiated sound power.
• Near Field, Far Field
• Sound Intensity Measurements
• Methods of Determining Sound Power Level
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
• Understand the acoustic regions of near field and
far field are based on characteristic dimensions,
frequency, and distance from the source.
University of Adelaide 4
Sound Power
• We’ve already seen sound power many times in the
course.
• There is a bit more we need to know…
• See Chapter 6 of text book.
University of Adelaide 5
Sound Power
• Allows comparison between machines.
University of Adelaide 6
Sound Power
𝐷𝑊
𝐼
• Constant Power Source (omnidirectional) 4𝜋 𝑟
𝜌𝑐
𝐿 𝐿 10log 𝐷 10log 4𝜋𝑟 10log
400
𝐿 = sound pressure level (dB re 20Pa) ENC5 p204
𝐿 = sound power level (dB re 10‐12W)
𝐷 = directivity ( no units )
𝑟 = distance from source (m)
𝜌 = density (kg / m3)
𝑐 = speed of sound (m/s)
𝐼 = intensity (W/m2)
𝑊 = sound power (W)
• with one plane surface - same power radiated into
½ area so 3dB increase in Lp.
University of Adelaide 7
Sound Power
𝐷 𝑊 ENC5 p203
𝐼
• Constant Volume Velocity Source 4𝜋 𝑟
𝜌𝑐
𝐿 𝐿 20log 𝐷 10log 4𝜋𝑟 10log
400
ENC5 p204
𝐿 = sound pressure level (dB re 20Pa)
𝐿 = sound power level (dB re 10‐12W)
𝐷 = directivity ( no units )
𝑟 = distance from source (m)
𝜌 = density (kg / m3)
𝑐 = speed of sound (m/s)
𝐼 = intensity (W/m2)
𝑊 = sound power radiated in free field (W)
• with one plane surface, get pressure doubling so 6dB
increase in Lp.
University of Adelaide 8
Sound Power
𝑊
• Constant Pressure Source 𝐼
4𝜋 𝑟
Above 2 Eqs. only hold if source < λ/10 from reflecting surface.
Effect reduces to constant power source equation at λ/2 for a band of
noise and 2λ for a tone.
University of Adelaide 9
Sound Power
Free space 1 0 0 0
Flat plane 2 3 6 0
Junction of 2 planes 4 6 12 0
Corner of 3 planes 8 9 18 0
University of Adelaide 10
Acoustic Regions
Classified based on
30
• wavelength 20
Far field
• r distance from object
n
tio
10
= nsi
Tr
• ℓ characteristic
a
an
Tr
5 si
6
= 2r / R
dimension of object tio
=
n Transition
3
1/
(typically the largest
6
= 2
2
dimension) Geometric
1 near field
• 𝜅 𝜋ℓ/𝜆 ; 𝛾 2𝑟⁄ℓ Hydrodynamic
• Some sources do not 0.5 near field
have hydrodynamic 0.3
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 3 5 10 20 30
near field. 6 = BR / 8
ENC5 p206
University of Adelaide 11
Acoustic Regions
• The sound field radiated by a source in a free field may
be divided into three regions:
– hydrodynamic near field,
– geometric near field,
– far field.
University of Adelaide 12
Hydrodynamic
Near Field
University of Adelaide 13
Hydrodynamic
Near Field
14
University of Adelaide
Geometric
Near Field
• The geometric near field is the region where interference
between contributing waves from various parts of the
sound source lead to sound pressure levels that do not
decrease monotonically at a rate of 6dB per doubling of
the distance from the source.
• Local maxima and minima are common. This effect is
greater for pure tones than for bands of noise.
• Particle velocity and pressure are in phase which means
that a sufficient number of sound pressure level
measurements in the geometric near field will enable the
sound power to be determined.
University of Adelaide 16
Far Field
• The far field is the region beyond the geometric near field
where there are no reflecting surfaces and sound
pressure level decreases monotonically at 6dB per
doubling of the distance from the source.
• Far field characterised by:
𝑟 ≫ 𝜆⁄ 2 𝜋 ; 𝛾 ≫ 1⁄𝜅
FARFIELD: 𝑟≫ℓ ; 𝛾≫2
𝑟 ≫ 𝜋ℓ ⁄ 2𝜆 ; 𝛾 ≫ 𝜅
where 𝜅 𝜋ℓ/𝜆 ; 𝛾 2𝑟⁄ℓ
ENC5 p206
University of Adelaide 17
Sound Intensity Measurement
• In order to measure the sound power of an object, we
need to measure the sound intensity, and then integrate
over an imaginary surface.
• Interested in determining magnitude and direction of
acoustic energy flow.
• See text, Ch. 3 and Ch. 1 for details and definitions of
intensity.
• Measurements can be made in near field of machine.
• Sound power determined by averaging sound intensity
over an imaginary surface surrounding the source
• Nearby reflecting surfaces cause no problems
University of Adelaide 18
Sound Intensity Measurement
• Sound power determined by integrating sound intensity
over an imaginary surface
𝑊 𝐼 ⋅ 𝑛 𝑑𝐴
Sound source
Imaginary grid created
around device
Sound intensity probe
Why is it pointing this way?
𝑊 𝐼 ⋅ 𝑛 𝑑𝐴
University of Adelaide 20
Sound Intensity Measurement
• Can obtain good measurements by manual or robotic
scanning of intensity probe over the measurement surface or
by taking stationary measurements at a number of fixed
locations on the measurement surface as described in
ISO 9614 standards.
• intensity is a vector quantity so only measures net energy flow
through surface
– thus measurements can be made in presence of other noise sources
but contribution of these other sources to Lp cannot be more than
10dB above source to be measured due to instrumentation
limitations.
• Measurement errors
– mainly associated with difficulty in accurately measuring u and p-u
phase.
University of Adelaide 21
Sound Intensity Measurement
• When measuring sound intensity, the best spacing
between the microphones depends on the frequency
range to be measured.
Harris, C.M., “Handbook of Acoustic Measurements and Noise Control: Third Edition”, Acoustical Society of America, New York, USA 1998.
University of Adelaide 22
Sound Power from SPL Measurements
Many ways to determine sound power:
• Laboratory measurements
– using anechoic or reverberant rooms
• Far field pressure measurements
– substitution method
– room absorption source
• reference sound source
• reverberation times
– two separate measurement surfaces
• Near field pressure measurements
• Surface vibration measurements
(not discussed here - see text book)
University of Adelaide 30
Sound Power from SPL Measurements
y 0.93
ANECHOIC ROOM z=0
7 0.36
(free and semi-free field) 0.58
0.58
• sound power determined 5 2
0.36
from far field 6
0.93
3
measurements in a grid 4 1 x
pattern.
12 11
10 9
ENC5 p210
University of Adelaide 31
Sound Power from SPL Measurements
Array of
mics
Sound
power
source
University of Adelaide 32
Measurement in a Diffuse Field
• required minimum room volume ENC5 p213
– 1.3 𝜆 if measuring in octave bands
– 4.6 𝜆 if measuring in 1/3 octave bands
where λ is the wavelength of sound corresponding to the lowest
band centre frequency.
– if measuring a discrete tone the minimum room volume is
2000
𝑉 𝑇
𝑓
• optimum room dimensions - 2:3:5
• required mean absorption coefficient
– When measuring mid to high frequencies, α 0.06
– When measuring low frequencies, advantageous to increase
room absorption to α 0.15, as this increases modal overlap.
University of Adelaide 33
Measurement in a Diffuse Field
Two measurement methods
1) reverberation time measurement in reverb chamber
– The absorption coefficient of the test room should be less than
α 0.06 in all test frequency bands,
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑉 10 log 𝑇
10 log 1 𝑆 𝜆⁄8 𝑉 13.9 dB re 10 W
ENC5 p214
𝐿 = sound power level ( dB re 10‐12 W )
𝐿 = sound pressure level ( dB re 20Pa )
𝑉 = volume of room ( m3 )
𝑇 = reverberation time ( seconds )
𝑆 = surface area of room in (m2 )
𝜆 = wavelength of sound ( m )
University of Adelaide 34
Measurement in a Diffuse Field
2) substitution method
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 ENC5 p214
University of Adelaide 35
METHOD 1: ROOM ABSORPTION MEASUREMENT
A. Reference Sound Source
• Placed in same room as equipment to be measured.
• measured on a test hemisphere of radius r
surrounding the reference source.
• Area of hemisphere, 𝑆 2𝜋 𝑟
• (value of 𝐿 in free field) calculated from reference
source power level
𝜌𝑐
𝐿 𝐿 20 log 𝑟 8 10 log
400
ENC5 p215
University of Adelaide 36
• 𝐿 in terms of 𝐿 is
𝐷 4 𝜌𝑐
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 10 log
4𝜋𝑟 𝑅 400
• substituting for 𝐿 gives
1 4
𝐿 10 log 𝑆 𝐿 10 log
𝑆 𝑅
• Rearranging gives 4 ⁄
10 1 𝑆 m ENC5 p216
𝑅
• R is the room constant proportional to the room
absorption.
• Sound power level of noise source is ENC5 p216
𝐷 4 𝜌𝑐
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 10 log dB re 10 W
4𝜋 𝑟 𝑅 400
University of Adelaide 37
B. Reverberation time
Room absorption, 4 / R determined using:
𝑅 = room constant in m2
4 4𝑐 𝑇 𝑇 = reverberation time in s
𝑐 = speed of sound in m/s
ENC5 p336 𝑅 55.25 𝑉
𝑉 = volume of room in m3
𝑆 = surface area of room in m2
𝑆α 𝑅 = room constant in m2
ENC5 p329 𝑅 α = average Sabine coeff of room
1 α
(See Chapter 6 for more information)
University of Adelaide 38
Substitution Method
METHOD 2. Substitution
• Measure 𝐿 on a test hemisphere surrounding the
machine.
• Replace machine with reference source of power 𝐿
and measure 𝐿 on the same test hemisphere.
• Machine sound power is then
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 dB ENC5 p216
University of Adelaide 39
Substitution Method
• This is clever in its simplicity …
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 dB
…. then we just add this delta in SPL to the sound power level of
the reference source…
and presto, that is the sound power level of the device under
test.
University of Adelaide 40
Reference Sound Sources
University of Adelaide 41
Application of Substitution Method
1. Put the reference sound power
source in the room and measure the
SPL. We measure LpR and know LwR .
𝐷 4 1 𝛼
𝐿 10log
4𝜋𝑟 𝑆𝛼
• Rearranging gives ENC5 p217
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑆 𝑆
⁄ 𝜌𝑐
10 log 10 1 10 log
400
University of Adelaide 43
ASSUMPTIONS FOR FAR FIELD DETERMINATION OF
SOUND POWER
• Background noise negligible or taken into account by
repeating measurements with machine and reference source
turned off.
• Power measurement will not be extrapolated to machine
located close to a different number of reflecting surfaces.
• Measurements made in far field (or geometric field) of sound
sources.
• Same number of measurements used as for a free field test.
• Measurements done in 1/3 or 1/1 octave bands 63Hz to 8kHz.
University of Adelaide 44
Near Field Measurements
• Measurement surface 1m from machine surface;
approximately same shape as machine surface;
usually parallelepiped (i.e. a rectangular box) .
• Sound absorbing material should be placed on nearby
reflective surfaces.
• 5-16 measurements needed on test surface, depending on
sound field uniformity
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑆 Δ Δ dB re 10 W
Rearranging gives
⁄ 𝑆
Δ 𝐿 𝐿 10 log 10 1 10 log 1
𝑆
ENC5 p220
University of Adelaide 46
1 Graphical Estimation
ENC5 p220
University of Adelaide 47
1 Estimation
2. From Surface Absorption Coefficients
4𝑆 1 α
Δ 10 log 1
𝑆 α ENC5 p220
University of Adelaide 48
Mean acoustic
absorption ENC5 p221
Coefficient α Description of room
0.05 nearly empty room with smooth hard walls made of concrete, bricks,
plaster or tile
0.1 partly empty room, room with smooth walls
0.15 room with furniture, rectangular machinery room, rectangular
industrial room
0.2 irregularly shaped room with furniture, irregularly shaped machinery
room or industrial room
0.25 room with upholstered furniture, machinery or industrial room with a
small amount of acoustical material, e.g., partially absorptive ceiling,
on ceiling or walls
0.35 room with acoustical materials on both ceiling and walls
0.5 room with large amounts of acoustical materials on ceiling and walls
University of Adelaide 49
1 Estimation
3. From Table Below ENC5 p219
University of Adelaide 50
2 Estimation
ENC5 p219
University of Adelaide 51
Summary
• Effects of nearby surfaces on radiated sound power.
• Definitions of Near Field, Far Field
• Sound Intensity Measurements
• Several methods for measuring Sound Power Level
University of Adelaide 52
Carl Howard
Sound Sources
d/2
we can look at …
d/2
negative
Sound Power
y Sound Source
Receiver
• Outdoor sound
propagation Outdoor
University of Adelaide 2
Contents
• Modal response of rooms.
• Diffuse sound field.
• Sabine rooms.
• Reverberation time.
• Panel absorbers.
• Response of long and flat rooms.
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
• Understand the acoustic response within a room due to
direct and reverberant field.
• Understand how to calculate the reverberation time.
• Understand how to design a panel absorber.
• Be able to calculate the change in SPL by installing
acoustic absorption.
University of Adelaide 4
www.socrative.com
Question … Room b069a2aa
University of Adelaide 5
Sound in Enclosed Spaces
• A sound field comprises
– Direct field and
– Reflected (Reverberant) field
Reverberant
field
Direct field
University of Adelaide 6
Sound absorption is used in enclosures to
“soak” up sound
University of Adelaide 8
Scale Model Testing
Measurement in a scale
model of a reverberation
Chamber
Miniature
omnidirectional
sound source
University of Adelaide 9
Scale Model Testing
• Walt Disney Concert Hall: one-tenth-scale model
http://wdch10.laphil.com/wdch10/wdch/acoustics.html
University of Adelaide 10
Absorption by Walls
• Each time an acoustic wave strikes an absorbing wall,
a little bit more of sound is absorbed
1st Reflection
2nd Reflection
3rd Reflection
University of Adelaide 11
Analogy of a Water Tank
Water flowing
into tank
SPL in room
Height of
Acoustic power
water in tank
into room
Acoustic power
absorbed by room
h
Water flowing
out of tank
• Power Balance:
“Power In” related to “Energy Stored” plus “Power Out”
University of Adelaide 12
Energy Balance
• In maths speak we could write that the sound power P
injected into the room during time Δ𝑡 must equal the
change of stored acoustic energy in the room Δ𝐸 plus the
sound power flowing out or absorbed by the room 𝑃
during time Δ𝑡.
Just like any other energy
balance for thermodynamics,
mass flow, electrical systems
etc.
University of Adelaide 13
Transient Response
Input 1 2 3 4
1. Sound power turned on. Power
Leads to discussion on
Time
reverberation time T60.
University of Adelaide 14
Transient Response
• Actual measured decay response of a room
Sound Pressure Level
[dB uncalibrated]
Time [milliseconds]
University of Adelaide 15
Sound In Enclosed Spaces
• Following analysis assumes that
coupling between enclosed
sound field and enclosing wall
vibration is small Lz
• Sabine rooms are close to cubic
such that no room dimension
exceeds either of the other two Ly
by more than a factor of 3.
• If room is not Sabine, z y
it is "flat" or "long"
x Lx
• Following modal analysis uses tiny source of
rectangular rooms for
mathematical convenience sound at x=y=z=0
– same principles apply to rooms of
any shape
University of Adelaide 16
Modal Response at Low Frequencies
• Low frequencies 90
– modal response 80
60
separated
50
010
100
001
101
020
120
200
210
121
201
002
030
110
011
111
Lp (dB re 20 Pa)
– sound field characterized by
20 25 31.5 40 50 63 80
nodes and antinodes
– SPL varies dramatically as a 90
function of location and 80
frequency 70
• High frequencies 60
ENC p292
University of Adelaide 17
Acoustic Modes of a Room
y Sound Source
Receiver
z
Modal Summation
• Individual modal responses can be summed to form the
total response of a system.
1 x P1
2 x P2
3 x P3
4 x P4
Theory …
PROBLEM: Derive expressions for modal resonance
frequencies and modal pressure distributions for a
rectangular cavity by solving the wave equation with
appropriate boundary conditions
SOLUTION:
1
2
Wave equation: 2 = 2 2
c t
Assume solution 𝜙 𝑋 𝑥 𝑌 𝑦 𝑍 𝑧 𝑒 j𝜔 𝑡
University of Adelaide 20
Rectangular Room
As k is constant for fixed ω, X ''
= k x2 ;
Y ''
= k y2 ;
Z ''
= k z2 ;
X Y Z
jk x x
𝑘 𝑘 𝑘 𝑘
Solutions: X Ax e Bx e
jk x x
jkxYZe j t Axe jk x x Bxe jk x x x 0,Lx 0
Using x = 0, gives Ax = Bx
Using x = Lx, and Ax = Bx gives:
e jk x Lx e-jk x Lx =2 jsink x Lx =0
n
Thus: k x = ;similar results apply for ky, ky
Lx
University of Adelaide 21
Rectangular Room
𝑛 𝜋 𝑛 𝜋 𝑛 𝜋 𝜔
Thus:
𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝑐
𝑓 , , = natural frequency in Hz
𝑐 = speed of sound in m/s
𝑛 = mode number in a particular axis 0 to ∞
𝐿 = length along a particular axis in m
University of Adelaide 22
Rectangular Room
𝒏𝒙 𝒏𝒚 𝒏𝒛 𝒇 [ Hz]
How to calculate the resonance frequencies …
0 0 0
0 0 1
• Write out a table with columns for 𝑛 , 𝑛 , 𝑛
0 0 2
with all combinations from 0 to N. For
example if N=2. 0 1 0
University of Adelaide 23
Rectangular Room
𝜕𝜙
Modal pressure distribution: 𝑝 𝜌
𝜕𝑡
𝑗𝜔𝜌 𝑋 𝑥 𝑌 𝑦 𝑍 𝑧 𝑒
University of Adelaide 24
Question …
A room 10 × 10 × 4m has an average Sabine absorption
coefficient = 0.1. The steady state reverberant field pressure
level is 60dB.
a) What is the lowest resonance frequency of the room
(excluding the 0,0,0 mode)?
b) At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on the
walls of the room?
c) What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of the
noise source producing this pressure level?
d) At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
(Assume that the noise source is on the floor in the centre of
the room).
e) Calculate the room reverberation time (seconds).
University of Adelaide 25
Question
On Socrative.com Room b069a2aa
A. 1715 Hz
B. 49.3 Hz
C. 24.25 Hz
D. 17.15 Hz
University of Adelaide 26
Cylindrical Room
𝑐 𝑛 𝜓 ,
𝑓 𝑛 , 𝑚, 𝑛 ENC5 p322
2 𝐿 𝑎
Values of ψm,n
m\n 0 1 2 3 4
0 0.0000 1.2197 2.2331 3.2383 4.2411
1 0.5861 1.6971 2.7172 3.7261 4.7312
2 0.9722 2.1346 3.1734 4.1923 5.2036
3 1.3373 2.5513 3.6115 4.6428 5.6623
4 1.6926 2.9547 4.0368 5.0815 6.1103
University of Adelaide 28
Cylindrical Room
The SpaceX Falcon 9 Payload
Fairing was successfully tested at
the NASA Glenn Research Center
Plum Brook Station’s
Reverberant Acoustic Test
Facility (RATF) during May-June
2013.
From Hozman, Hughes, “An Evaluation of the Additional Acoustic Power Needed
to Overcome the Effects of a Test‐Article’s Absorption during Reverberant
Chamber Acoustic Testing of Spaceflight Hardware”, Noise‐Con 2014, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida, September 8‐10, 2014
University of Adelaide 29
Modal Overlap
bandwidth
Room-response, LP (dB)
3 dB
a
b c
For this sketch
M=0.3
measurement band d
Frequency (Hz)
• in above figure, Modal Overlap M = (a+b+c)/d
𝑀 Δ𝑓 𝑑𝑁⁄𝑑𝑓
• Δ f = average modal bandwidth for modes in the measurement band
• 𝑑𝑁⁄𝑑𝑓 is the modal density (see next page …) ENC5 p324
University of Adelaide 30
Rectangular Room
• Number of modes with frequencies below f
4𝜋𝑓 𝑉 𝜋𝑓 𝑆 𝑓 𝐿 V = volume m3
𝑁 S = surface area m2
3𝑐 4𝑐 8𝑐 L = perimeter m
f = frequency Hz
• Modal Density c = speed of sound m/s
𝑑𝑁 4𝜋𝑓 𝑉 𝜋𝑓𝑆 𝐿
𝑑𝑓 𝑐 2𝑐 8𝑐
Q quality factor
η modal loss factor
• Modal Damping logarithmic decrement
ζ critical damping ratio
Δ𝑓 2.2 1 2𝜁 𝛿
𝜂 T 60 reverberation time
𝑓 𝑇 𝑓 𝑄 1 𝜁 𝜋 Δf bandwidth
f centre frequency
ENC5 p324
University of Adelaide 31
Cross-Over Frequency
From low to high frequency (statistical) behaviour
• 1/3 or octave band noise / analysis
– 3-6 modes must be resonant in frequency band
for high frequency analysis
• Single frequency
– Modal overlap M > 3 for high frequency analysis
University of Adelaide 32
Diffuse Sound Field
See ENC5 p325
• Intensity = 0
• Require Modal Overlap M 3
• does NOT imply uniform spatial pressure distribution
• p2 fluctuates in time and space
• Standard deviation of fluctuations
⁄
𝜎 ≅ 5.57 1 0.238 𝐵 𝑇 dB
University of Adelaide 33
Effective Intensity in a Diffuse Sound Field
z
• Intensity flowing in any one 2
particular direction such as
into a wall
dS (circular
section area)
spherical
region
y
2r
. x
N
ENC5 p326
University of Adelaide 34
• ratio of the volume of the spherical region to the cylindrical section of
column which just encompasses the spherical region is:
4r 3 1 2
=
3 2r 3 3
• Time for sound to travel through sphere = 2r/c
• Incremental contribution per unit area to the energy E in the spherical
region due to any beam is: 2 2r
E = I
3 c
• total energy is obtained by integrating the incremental energy contribution
per unit area of sphere over the area of the sphere. The incremental area of
sphere for use in integration is, d S r 2 sin d d
• Thus, 2
E E dS = E r d r sin d
S 0 0
2
4I 16I r 3
=
3c 0 d 0 r sin d = 3c
3
University of Adelaide 35
E 16I r 3 /3c
• Energy Density, =
V 4 r 3 /3
• Thus, I = c/4
• Would like to get diffuse field intensity (in a single
direction) defined in terms of the sound pressure
– Consider a plane wave of unit cross-sectional area travelling a
unit distance:
• Contribution of plane wave to the energy in the resulting unit
volume is E = I 1 1 /c
• Also, E = V = 1 1 1
• thus for a plane wave, = I/c
• However, for a plane wave, I = p 2 /c
• Thus, = p 2 /c 2
University of Adelaide 36
• In a diffuse field, ENC5 p327
University of Adelaide 37
Question …
A room 10 × 10 × 4m has an average Sabine absorption
coefficient = 0.1. The steady state reverberant field pressure
level is 60dB.
a) What is the lowest resonance frequency of the room
(excluding the 0,0,0 mode)?
b) At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on the
walls of the room?
c) What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of the
noise source producing this pressure level?
d) At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
(Assume that the noise source is on the floor in the centre of
the room).
e) Calculate the room reverberation time (seconds).
University of Adelaide 38
Question
• On Socrative.com
• At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on
the walls of the room?
A. 1.21 10 W/m2
B. 2.41 10 W/m2
C. 9.64 10 W/m2
D. 4.15 10 W/m2
University of Adelaide 39
Sound Absorption In Rooms
• Assume walls locally reactive
– walls characterized by impedance (surface property)
– local wall response independent of response at other locations
• locally reactive assumption invalid in:
– vehicles, planes
– very low frequencies in rooms
• Surface absorption
– fraction of incident energy absorbed by room surfaces,
University of Adelaide 41
Air Absorption
a = 4m 'V/S
• Air absorption,
– mean free path in empty room =4V/S
– 𝛼 4𝑚′ 𝑉 ⁄𝑆
where m’ is the energy attenuation constant defined using:
2 2
p 1 = p 0 e - m x
x
10 m ' log 10 e = 10 log 10 p 0 / p1 =
1 2
m
1000
Where m is the attenuation in air in dB per 1000 metres
University of Adelaide 42
Air Absorption
4
– Thus: 4m' 9.21 10 m
where m is in dB/1000 metres;
see ENC5 p240 table 5.3 for values based on temperature,
relative humidity and frequency.
• Total absorption coefficient
𝛼 = absorption by walls
𝛼 = absorption by air
𝑚 = attenuation in air dB/1000 metres
𝑉 = volume of room (m3)
𝑆 = room surface area (m2)
University of Adelaide 43
Absorption by Walls
• Every time a sound wave strikes the wall
some energy is absorbed.
Sound power incident on material
𝑊 Sound power absorbed
𝑊𝛼 by first reflection
𝑊 𝑊 1 𝛼
Sound power remaining
in reverberant field Sound absorbing material
Sanity check:
Incident Absorbed Reflected Transmitted
𝑊⏞ 𝑊𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 ⏞
0 𝑊𝛼 𝑊 𝑊𝛼 𝑊
University of Adelaide 44
Absorption by Walls
• … and this continues on and on and on ….
𝑊𝛼
1st Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼
𝑊 2nd Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼
𝑊 1 𝛼
3rd Reflection
𝑊𝛼 1 𝛼
University of Adelaide 45
Absorption by Walls …
• Derivation
Incident Absorbed Reflected
1st Reflection 𝑊⏞ 𝑊𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
2nd Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 1 𝛼
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
3rd Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 1 𝛼
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
University of Adelaide 46
Absorption by Walls …
• Just look at the power absorbed
Incident Absorbed Reflected
1st Reflection 𝑊⏞ 𝑊𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
2nd Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 1 𝛼
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
3rd Reflection
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼 1 𝛼
𝑊 1 𝛼 𝛼 𝑊 1 𝛼
University of Adelaide 47
Absorption by Walls …
• Just look at the power absorbed by the walls
1st Reflection 2nd Reflection 3rd Reflection
𝑊 𝑊𝛼 𝑊𝛼 1 𝛼 𝑊𝛼 1 𝛼 ⋯
1
𝑊 𝑊𝛼 1 𝛼 𝑥 for 𝑥 1
1 𝑥
1 1
𝑊 𝑊𝛼 𝑊𝛼 𝑊
1 1 𝛼 𝛼
• What was that all about??
– We just proved that the power absorbed must equal
the power injected into the room. 𝑊 𝑊
University of Adelaide 48
Steady State Response
• What we want is an equation for the sound pressure level
in an enclosure with absorbing materials on the walls,
when there is a sound power source in the enclosure.
p2 p 2R + p 2D
s ,t s ,t t
direct
Direct field
reverberant
University of Adelaide 49
Steady State Response
• Direct field
𝐷
𝑝 𝑊𝜌𝑐
4𝜋𝑟
Direct field
𝐷 = directivity factor (no units)
𝑟 = distance from source in m
𝑊 = sound power of source in Watts
𝜌 = density in kg / m3
𝑐 = speed of sound in m/s
ENC5 p328
University of Adelaide 50
Steady State Response
• Reverberant field Reverberant
field
University of Adelaide 52
Absorption by Walls
• We can say that the power injected into the reverberant
field is everything after the first strike with the wall
(which is due the direct field)
𝑊 𝑊 1 𝛼
Sound power remaining
in reverberant field Sound
absorbing
material
University of Adelaide 53
Absorption by Walls …
• Power absorbed, Wa, by surfaces and air is rate of energy
absorbed, given by:
Wa = S [intensity in direction of absorbing surface]
p2
Wa S
4 c
Height of
Sound pressure water in tank
squared in room Sound Power
𝑝̅ h absorbed by walls
p2
R
Wa S
4 c
4𝜌𝑐𝑊 1 𝛼 Water flowing
𝑝
𝑆𝛼 out of tank
University of Adelaide 55
Steady State Response
• Total sound pressure is
𝑝 𝑝 𝑝
𝐷 4 1 α
𝑊𝜌𝑐
4𝜋𝑟 𝑆α
ENC5 p328
University of Adelaide 56
Steady-State Response
• The sound pressure in an enclosed space due to a sound
power source is
University of Adelaide 59
Steady-State Response
Direct field
SPL ‐6 dB per doubling of distance
[dB]
Reverberant field
University of Adelaide 60
Question …
A room 10 × 10 × 4m has an average Sabine absorption
coefficient = 0.1. The steady state reverberant field pressure
level is 60dB.
a) What is the lowest resonance frequency of the room
(excluding the 0,0,0 mode)?
b) At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on the
walls of the room?
c) What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of the
noise source producing this pressure level?
d) At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
(Assume that the noise source is on the floor in the centre of
the room).
e) Calculate the room reverberation time (seconds).
University of Adelaide 61
Answer ….
What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of
the noise source producing this pressure level?
2
pR
s ,t
4Wc 1 /S 10
10
p2R S
W
4
4 ρc 1 α
𝑆 2 10 10 2 10 4 2 10 4 360 m
p2R S
4 104 360 0.1
9.637W
W
4 ρc 1 α 4 1.21 343 1 0.1
Lw 10log10 9.637 106 120 69.8 dB re 10-12 W
University of Adelaide 62
Question …
A room 10 × 10 × 4m has an average Sabine absorption
coefficient = 0.1. The steady state reverberant field pressure
level is 60dB.
a) What is the lowest resonance frequency of the room
(excluding the 0,0,0 mode)?
b) At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on the
walls of the room?
c) What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of the
noise source producing this pressure level?
d) At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
(Assume that the noise source is on the floor in the centre of
the room).
e) Calculate the room reverberation time (seconds).
University of Adelaide 63
Answer ….
At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
4𝜌𝑐𝑊 1 𝛼 𝐷
𝑝 𝑝 𝑊𝜌𝑐
𝑆𝛼 4𝜋𝑟
4𝑊𝜌𝑐 1 𝛼 𝑊𝜌𝑐𝐷
𝑆𝛼 4𝜋𝑟
⁄ ⁄
𝐷 𝑆𝛼 2 360 0.1
𝑟 1.26 m
16𝜋 1 𝛼 16𝜋 1 0.1
University of Adelaide 64
Critical Distance
• This is an important result… It tells us the distance that
the reverberant field is equal to the direct field.
⁄
𝐷 𝑆α
𝑟critical
16𝜋 1 α
𝑟critical = distance that direct field = reverb in m
𝐷 = directivity factor (no units)
𝑆 = surface area of room with absorption m2
α = average sound absorption coeff (no units)
University of Adelaide 65
Transient Response (Classical Desc.)
PROBLEM: Relate room absorption S , to room reverberation time,
T60 (time for sound field to decay by 60 dB when sound is turned off)
SOLUTION
• Rate of change of energy, W, in the room = rate of supply, Wo minus
rate of absorption, Wa W V /t = W W W Sc /4
0 a 0
• Introduce X 4W 0 /Sc
then: dX
= 1
ψ 1
dt
= W 0 ψS αc/ 4
t V
1
X
=
Sc
4
W 0 Sc /4 -1
Thus, 1 dX
Scα
X dt 4V
Integrate: X
dX
t
S ac
=
X 0 4V
dt
X0
University of Adelaide 66
Transient Response (Cont.)
Thus, log e X log e X 0 = S αct/ 4V
and X = X 0 e - S ct/ 4V
• Relate the preceding analysis to reverberation time
– shut off power at time, t = 0. That is,
W0 t 0 = 0 X 0 0
– At time , t, =
4W0
X=
4W0
+ 0 e S ct/ 4V
Sc S c
– As p 2 p = p 0 e Sc t/ 4 V
2 2
L p 0 L p=1.086 Sc αt/V
1 1 1
60=1.086 S αcT60 /V where
𝑇 𝑁 𝑇
Thus, 55.25 𝑉
𝑇
𝑆𝑐𝛼 ENC5 p330
University of Adelaide 67
Question …
A room 10 × 10 × 4m has an average Sabine absorption
coefficient = 0.1. The steady state reverberant field pressure
level is 60dB.
a) What is the lowest resonance frequency of the room
(excluding the 0,0,0 mode)?
b) At what rate (in W/m2 ) is the sound energy incident on the
walls of the room?
c) What is the acoustic power output level (dB re 10-12 W) of the
noise source producing this pressure level?
d) At what distance from the noise source is the reverberant
field pressure level equal to the direct field pressure level?
(Assume that the noise source is on the floor in the centre of
the room).
e) Calculate the room reverberation time (seconds).
University of Adelaide 68
Question
• On Socrative.com Room b069a2aa
A. 0.107 s
B. 1.79 s
C. 44.5 s
University of Adelaide 69
Determination of - Method 2
• Reference source of known sound power level, Lw
• Measurements taken remote from sound source so
reverberant field dominates
4 1 𝛼
𝐿 𝐿 10 log
𝑆α
𝑆α ⁄
• Thus, 𝑅 4 10 ENC5 p335
1 α
and
1 ⁄
𝐿 10 log 10
𝑁
University of Adelaide 71
Transient Response - Modal Description
See text book for a detailed explanation of this.
• This analysis leads to the following reverberation time
equation: 55.25 𝑉
𝑇 ENC5 p331
𝑆𝑐 log 1 α
– Norris-Eyring equation
– used in architectural acoustics
– air absorption must be included in st
• If α < 0.4, error < 0.5 dB if we set st = loge 1 st
– Setting st ,
– gives the previous Sabine equation:
55.25V
T60 =
Sc
University of Adelaide 72
• If 1 st is replaced with st in Norris-Eyring equation,
then the equation of Millington and Sette is obtained:
55.25 𝑉
𝑇 ENC5 p332
𝑆𝑐 log 𝛽̅
• where
⁄
𝛽̅ 𝛽
University of Adelaide 73
Empirical Expressions
• Previous equations based on assumptions:
– room dimensions satisfy the conditions for Sabine rooms
– absorption is reasonably well distributed over the room surfaces
• for rooms which do not meet this criterion, the Sabine
expression for reverberation time is used with
replaced with which is defined as follows:
n
βi β i 1 α st S i2
log e 1 st 1+ 0 .5 2 log e 1 st i= 1
2
S 1 α st 2
xst , yst and zst are the average statistical absorption coefficients of
a pair of opposite room surfaces
S is the total room surface area.
University of Adelaide 76
Images from Pyrotek
Sound Absorbers
University of Adelaide 77
Example Products
• Micro-perforated panels and films
University of Adelaide 78
Sound Absorbers
• If the noise level in a room is too loud,
what options have you got ????
University of Adelaide 79
Sound Absorbers - Examples
University of Adelaide 80
Helmut Fuch (2013), “Applied Acoustics: Concepts, Absorbers, and Silencers for Acoustical Comfort and Noise
Control” Springer, ISBN 978‐3‐642‐29366‐5, page vii.
University of Adelaide 81
Sound Absorbers
• characterised by absorption coefficients ENC5 p336
• Sabine absorption coefficient, α
– measured in reverberant room
– measured values up to 1.2 𝑆α 55.3𝑉 1 𝑆′ 𝑆
m
𝑐 𝑇 𝑆′𝑇′
S’ =total area of walls, floor and ceiling and the sample material under test
S = sample material area (10‐12 m2)
𝑇 reverberation time of the room without the sample (s).
𝑇 reverberation time of the room with the sample (s).
University of Adelaide 82
1.0
0.9
R1 l /c = 3
0.8
4
5
0.7 10
20
st 0.5
0.6 50
100
200
500
0.4 1000
10000
0.3 100000
0.2
0.1
0
-3 -2 -1 0 1
10 10 10 10 10
f l/ c ENC5 p341
University of Adelaide 83
• Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC)
α α α α
NRC ENC5 p337
4
University of Adelaide 84
Porous Absorbers (Cont.)
B C
A: Perforated steel or Aluminium
panel D
– mechanical protection A
– > 20% open, with less open area
increasing low frequency
E
absorption and decreasing high
frequency absorption
B: spacer (12 mm mesh2mm thick
is OK)
C: Plastic wrapping
duct
– moisture barrier inner
– dust, oil and chemical protection wall
– 20 - 30 µm thick polyester OK
– thicker materials increase low
frequency absorption and
decrease high frequency
absorption
D: porous material absorber plus
backing cavity
E: solid backing wall
University of Adelaide 85
Porous Absorbers (Cont.)
• frequency of maximum absorption calculated using:
⁄
𝑐 𝑃⁄100
𝑓
2𝜋 𝐿 𝑡 0.85 𝑑 1 0.22 𝑑⁄𝑞
– P = % open area
– L = depth of porous material plus backing cavity (between
perforated facing and solid backing wall)
– d = diameter of holes in perforated panel
– q = distance between centres of holes in perforated panel
– t = thickness of perforated panel
ENC5 p342
University of Adelaide 86
Example – Measured Responses
Panel surface weight 2.5kg / m^2, l = 50mm, R=5 c
1.0 >25% open area
0.8
0.4
University of Adelaide 88
Panel Absorber Design
• Perforated panel
– surface weight = 2.5 kg/m2
– thickness = 3mm
• Porous liner
– 50 mm thick
– flow resistance = 5 ρc
University of Adelaide 89
Panel Absorber Design
DESIGN PROCEDURE L
• choose desired absorption curve (on figure with
“hills”, next page)
– Panel supports L > 0.4m
– Solid line represents porous material in cavity
– Dashed line represents bare cavity
• Choose fundamental resonance of panel f0
– (should be the same as frequency trying to attenuate)
• Select cavity depth, D, and panel mass per unit area,
m (on figure with criss-cross pattern)
1 𝜌𝑐 m = surface density of panel (kg / m2)
𝑓 D = depth backing cavity
2𝜋 𝑚𝐷
University of Adelaide 90
1.2
A
1.0
B
L
0.8 C
D
0.6
E
0.4 F
G
0.2 H
I
J
0.0
0.15 0.2 0.5 1.0 2 4 6 8 10
f/f0
ENC5 p344
University of Adelaide 91
Panel Absorber Design
10.0
f
J
(H
5.0 40
z)
Surface density (kg m- 2)
F
50
I
60
E
3.0 70
H
85
10
D
2.0
G
0
12
5
15
C
17 0
20 5
1.0 0
25
B
30 0
35 0
40 0
A
0.5 0
0.3
25 30 50 100 200 500 1000 1500
Cavity depth, D (mm) ENC5 p345
University of Adelaide 92
Combining Sound Absorption Coefficients
University of Adelaide 93
Flat Rooms
• Flat rooms are large in width and length compared to
their height a
– specularly reflecting floor and ceiling with energy reflection
coefficients 𝛽 , 𝛽 .
University of Adelaide 94
10
0.7
0.5
0.3
-10
0.1
ENC5 p349
-20
-30
0.1 1 10 100
r/a
University of Adelaide 95
FLAT ROOMS
• Diffusely reflecting floor and ceiling
– E.g. Furnished offices, factories with machinery or objects
causing scattering of sound.
Wc e z
p r
J0 r z/a zdz
2
R a2 1 z K1z
0
University of Adelaide 96
10
0.1
-10
-20
-30
0.1 1 10 100
r/a
University of Adelaide 97
LONG ROOMS
• Rectangular cross section dimensions 𝑎 𝑏,
specularly reflecting walls,
point source
Wc 1
4 m n
p r = 2
2
University of Adelaide 98
10
-20
-30
0.1 1 10 100
r/a
University of Adelaide 99
LONG ROOM
Rectangular cross section, specularly reflecting walls,
line source
n
W c 1 2
p2 r =
4 r
n1 na r
2
2 1/ 2
-10
0.1
-20
-30
0.1 1 10 100
r/a
University of Adelaide 101
Will Sound Absorbing Material Reduce
Noise Levels At A Particular Location In A
Room?
• Sound absorbing material only reduces reverberant field
levels
– to determine potential effectiveness, compare existing values of
4 Dθ
and
R 4πr 2
⁄
𝑇 𝐾 0.0118 𝑉 0.1070
a pdipole
Sound Sources
d/2 r
d/2
negative
Outdoor
Barriers
Mufflers
University of Adelaide 2
Contents
• Geometric spreading factors.
• Standard prediction schemes.
• Factors affecting transmission and attenuation over long
distances.
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
• Be able to calculate the sound pressure level from an
acoustic source due to propagation outdoors.
• Understand the factors that affect sound propagation
outdoors.
University of Adelaide 4
Noise Control Methods
• Noise and vibration can be reduced at the
University of Adelaide 6
What is important?
• Source
– Sound power
– Spreading: Hemispherical, Line Source, Incoherent Plane
– Directivity
University of Adelaide 7
What is important?
• Path
– Attenuation from reflection off ground
– Losses from transmission through air
– Meteorological: wind, temperature gradients, turbulence
– Trees and foliage
University of Adelaide 8
What is important?
• Path
– Barriers (discussed in separate lecture)
University of Adelaide 9
Question …
A sound power source 3m above ground level radiates of 2 watts
out the side of a building in the 2000 Hz octave band. The closest
community location is at a distance of 150m from the building in
a direction normal to the plane of the opening. The ground
between the opening and the community is grass covered. The
following questions refer only to the 2000Hz octave band.
a) Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the source.
b) Calculate the excess attenuation Ag due to ground reflection
for sound travelling from the opening to the nearest
community location (1.5m above ground)
(use Fig on ENC5 p231, R1= 2.25 × 105).
c) Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
d) Ignoring all other losses not mentioned above, calculate the
sound pressure level at the community location of (b) above.
University of Adelaide 10
Question ….
150m
x y
Receiver
3m
1.5 m
University of Adelaide 11
Outdoor Sound Propagation
• Determine power levels Lw of all sources.
University of Adelaide 12
Question …
A sound power source 3m above ground level radiates of 2 watts
out the side of a building in the 2000 Hz octave band. The closest
community location is at a distance of 150m from the building in
a direction normal to the plane of the opening. The ground
between the opening and the community is grass covered. The
following questions refer only to the 2000Hz octave band.
a) Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the source.
b) Calculate the excess attenuation Ag due to ground reflection
for sound travelling from the opening to the nearest
community location (1.5m above ground)
(use Fig. 5.20 in your text, R1= 2.25 × 105).
c) Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
d) Ignoring all other losses not mentioned above, calculate the
sound pressure level at the community location of (b) above.
University of Adelaide 13
Answer…
Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the
source.
𝐿 10 log 𝑊 120
10 log 2 120
123 dB re 10 12 W
University of Adelaide 14
Prediction Accuracy Influences
• accuracy of Lw and DIM
• variability in weather
- calculate Leq, L10, L90
University of Adelaide 15
Calculating Lpi From Lwi
• for a single source 𝐿 𝐿 𝐴 𝐷𝐼 𝐴 ENC5 p237
University of Adelaide 18
Calculating Lpi From Lwi
• For a single source
ENC5 p237
• geometrical spreading factor, 𝐴
- simple source 𝐴 10 log 4𝜋 20 log 𝑑 ENC5 p238
University of Adelaide 19
Calculating Lpi From Lwi
• geometrical spreading factor, 𝐴 (cont.)
incoherent plane source (wall)
where
𝛾 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2
𝐹 tan tan
𝛼 𝛾 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1 ⁄2 𝛾 𝛾 𝛽 𝛿 1 ⁄2 𝛾
𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛽 𝛿 1 ⁄2
tan tan
𝛾 𝛼 𝛽 𝛿 1⁄2 𝛾 𝛾 𝛽 𝛿 1 ⁄2 𝛾
University of Adelaide 20
Calculating Lpi From Lwi
• directivity index, DIM
– accounts for source directivity
– excludes ground reflection
- includes effect of other reflecting surfaces
𝐴 = excess attenuation in dB
𝐴 = atten due to air absorption in dB
𝐴 = atten due to barriers, houses, process equipment in dB
𝐴 = atten due to forests in dB
𝐴 = atten due to ground reflection in dB
𝐴 = atten due to meteorological effects in dB
University of Adelaide 21
Calculating Lpi From Lwi
• excess attenuation effects, AE, calculated individually and
decibels are added arithmetically (except barrier, wind and
temperature gradient, and ground effects are combined)
• atmospheric absorption,
ENC5 p239
- see ENC5 p240 for values of m
- function of temperature and RH
• shielding by barriers, Ab - see separate topic, ENC5 p264
• attenuation due to forests and foliage
• meteorological influences
– turbulence (usually included in ground effect)
– wind gradients
– temperature gradients
• ground effects
University of Adelaide 22
Atmospheric Absorption
ENC5 p240
University of Adelaide 23
Question …
A sound power source 3m above ground level radiates of 2 watts
out the side of a building in the 2000 Hz octave band. The closest
community location is at a distance of 150m from the building in
a direction normal to the plane of the opening. The ground
between the opening and the community is grass covered. The
following questions refer only to the 2000Hz octave band.
a) Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the source.
b) Calculate the excess attenuation Ag due to ground reflection
for sound travelling from the opening to the nearest
community location (1.5m above ground)
(use Fig. 5.20 in your text, R1= 2.25 × 105).
c) Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
d) Ignoring all other losses not mentioned above, calculate the
sound pressure level at the community location of (b) above.
University of Adelaide 24
Answer …
Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
atmospheric absorption, 𝐴 𝑚𝑑
150
𝐴 15.5 2.3 dB
1000
University of Adelaide 25
Trees And Foliage Attenuation
For a heavily wooded area (Hoover, 1961) obtained:
Other work has produced the following conclusions:
A f =0.01r f 1/ 3 ENC4 p241
University of Adelaide 26
Trees And Foliage Attenuation (Cont.)
• psychological effect of vegetation as a barrier is important - in many cases if the
noise source is not visible, it is less noticeable and annoying, even if the level is
not significantly changed.
• ISO 9613-2 (1996) gives the attenuation values in Table 5.4 for sound
propagation through dense foliage. For distances of less than 20 m, the values
given are absolute dB. For distances between 20 and 200 m, the values given are
dB/m and for distances greater than 200 m, the value for 200 m is used.
ENC5 p285
University of Adelaide 27
Trees And Foliage Attenuation (Cont.)
• The distance of travel through the foliage is not equal to
the extent of the foliage between the source and receiver
- depends on the height of the source and receiver and the radius
of curvature of the propagating wave as a result of wind and
temperature gradients - see figure
r1
r2
Source Receiver
ENC5 p285
University of Adelaide 28
Shielding By Barriers
Abhp = Ab + Ah + A p ENC4 p237
University of Adelaide 29
Shielding By Barriers (Cont.)
• The excess attenuation due to process equipment (Ap)
may be calculated using the values in line 1 of the table in
the foliage section
– The distance (r1) to be used for the calculation is only that part of
the curved sound ray (close to the source) that travels through
the process equipment and the maximum attenuation that is
expected is 10dB.
University of Adelaide 30
Ground Effects - 5 Methods
• SIMPLE METHOD
– Hard ground, 𝐴 3 dB ENC5 p240
– Soft ground, 𝐴 3 dB
• CONCAWE method (CONservation of Clean Air and Water in Europe)
• PLANE WAVE REFLECTION METHOD
• ISO 9613 METHOD
• SPHERICAL WAVE REFLECTION METHOD INCLUDING EFFECTS OF
TURBULENCE (not covered here but discussed in text book) receiver
r
source
r2 hr
r1
hs
air
ground L
image
source
University of Adelaide 31
CONCAWE Method
• Based on experimental data taken in vicinity of
3 processing plants in Europe.
15
250
10
500
Attenuation (dB)
125
5 1000
2000
4000
0
63
-5
100 500 1000 2000
Distance from source (m)
ENC5 p276
University of Adelaide 32
Plane Wave Reflection Method For Ground
Attenuation Calculations
• assumes incoherent combination of direct and reflected
waves, attenuation is ARL = -20log10|Rp| dB
𝐴 𝑍 cos𝜃 𝜌𝑐 cos𝜓
𝑅 ENC5 p230
𝐴 𝑍 cos𝜃 𝜌𝑐 cos𝜓
𝐴 , 𝐴 = amplitude of incident and reflected pressure wave
2
Ag = 10 log 10 1+| R p | = 10 log 10 1+10 A R / 10
ENC4 p244
University of Adelaide 33
0
less than 0.001
0.01
Reflection loss A rf (dB)
0.02
0.05
10
0.1
0.2
f / R1=1
20
1 10 100 1000 10,000
1/2
Reflection parameter, [R1 /f ] (degrees)
ENC5 p231
University of Adelaide 34
Question …
A sound power source 3m above ground level radiates of 2 watts
out the side of a building in the 2000 Hz octave band. The closest
community location is at a distance of 150m from the building in
a direction normal to the plane of the opening. The ground
between the opening and the community is grass covered. The
following questions refer only to the 2000Hz octave band.
a) Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the source.
b) Calculate the excess attenuation Ag due to ground reflection
for sound travelling from the opening to the nearest
community location (1.5m above ground)
(use Fig. 5.20 in your text, R1= 2.25 × 105).
c) Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
d) Ignoring all other losses not mentioned above, calculate the
sound pressure level at the community location of (b) above.
University of Adelaide 35
150m
Answer …. x y
Receiver
3m
1.5 m
𝜌𝑓 1.21 2000
0.01075
𝑅 2.25 10
/ /
𝑅 1
𝛽 1.72 16.6
𝜌𝑓 0.01075
University of Adelaide 36
0
AR=1.3 dB less than 0.001
0.01
Reflection loss Arf (dB)
0.02
0.05
10
0.1
0.2
rf /R1=1
20
1 10 16.6 100 1000 10,000
1/2
Reflection parameter, b [R1 /rf ] (degrees)
ENC5 p231
University of Adelaide 37
Answer ….
Ag = 10 log 10 1+10 AR / 10
10 log 10 1+10 1 . 3 / 10
2.4 dB
Thus the effect of the ground is to increase the level at the
receiver by 2.4dB.
AE = Aa Ab + A f + Ag + Am
𝐿 𝐿 𝐴 𝐷𝐼 𝐴
University of Adelaide 38
Question …
A sound power source 3m above ground level radiates of 2 watts
out the side of a building in the 2000 Hz octave band. The closest
community location is at a distance of 150m from the building in
a direction normal to the plane of the opening. The ground
between the opening and the community is grass covered. The
following questions refer only to the 2000Hz octave band.
a) Calculate the sound power level Lw radiated from the source.
b) Calculate the excess attenuation Ag due to ground reflection
for sound travelling from the opening to the nearest
community location (1.5m above ground)
(use Fig. 5.20 in your text, R1= 2.25 × 105).
c) Calculate the loss due to atmospheric absorption (in dB).
Assume RH = 25%, and a temperature of 20°C.
d) Ignoring all other losses not mentioned above, calculate the
sound pressure level at the community location of (b) above.
University of Adelaide 39
Answer …
5.87 10
𝐿 10 log 71.66 dB
20 10
AE = Aa Ab + A f + A g + Am
= Aa A g 2.3 ( 2.4) 0.1 dB
𝐿 𝐿 𝐴 𝐷𝐼 𝐴
71.7 0.1 71.8 dB
University of Adelaide 40
ISO 9613 Method For Ground Attenuation
• moderately complex and yields results of moderate accuracy.
• space between the source and receiver is divided into three zones
– source zone extends a distance of 30hs from the source towards the receiver
– receiver zone extends 30hr from the receiver towards the source.
– middle zone includes the remainder of the path between the source and
receiver
• will not exist if the source / receiver separation is less than r = 30hs + 30hr.
• The total excess attenuation due to the ground is the sum of the
excess attenuations for each of the three zones. That is:
Ag = As + Amid + Ar
• Values for each of the three quantities on the right hand side of Ag
may be calculated using the table on the next page
ENC5 p282
University of Adelaide 41
ISO 9613 Method For Ground Attenuation
Amid
3q ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm) ‐3q(1‐Gm)
(dB)
as , ar=1.5+3.0e
- 0.12( hs,r - 5 )2
1 e r / 50
+5.7e - 0.9 hs2,r
1 e
2.810 6 r 2
b s ,b r 1.5+8.6e
0.09 hs2,r
1 e r / 50
cs ,cr 1.5+14.0e
0.46 hs2,r
1 e r / 50
d s ,d r 1.5+5.0e
0.09 hs2,r
1 e r / 50
ENC5 p283
University of Adelaide 43
ISO 9613 Method For Ground Attenuation
30 ℎ ℎ
𝑞 1 ENC5 p282
𝑑
University of Adelaide 44
Meteorological Influences
Excess attenuation Amet (dB) due to wind and temperature
gradients at two distances, 110 m and 616 m.
Total
vertical Octave band centre frequency (Hz)
gradient
(s‐1) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000
110 meters
+0.075 ‐2 ‐2 ‐0.5 3 ‐2 ‐5 ‐2 ‐2 ‐2 ‐2
‐0.075 1 1 2.5 0 2 6 10 6 6 6
616 meters
+0.075 ‐5 ‐5 ‐2 0 ‐9 ‐9 ‐6 ‐7 ‐7 ‐7
‐0.075 5 5 6 4 7 7 7 6 6 6
ENC5 p262
University of Adelaide 45
Meteorological Influences
• total sonic gradient due to wind and temp.
d c dU c
d h d h h T
dU U(h)
where, =
dh h
U(h)=U 0 h ; h= 10 m and ξ= 0 .15
U(h) is wind speed at height h
𝜕𝑐 𝑑𝑇 ⁄
𝐴 10.3 𝑇 273
𝜕ℎ 𝑑ℎ
T0 is temperature at 1m height
ENC5 p246
University of Adelaide 46
Meteorological Influences
1
• radius of curvature of sound waves dc
R=c0 ENC5 p245
dh
– c0 = speed of sound at sea level and 0C (331m/sec)
– if r +ve, rays curve down
– if r -ve, rays curve up
University of Adelaide 47
Alternative Calculation of
Meteorological Influences
• 6 categories based on total sonic gradient
Pasquill Stability Category
Meteor‐
ological A,B C,D,E
Category wind speed, F,G
v (ms‐1)
1 v < ‐ 3.0 ‐ ‐
2 ‐3.0 < v < ‐0.5 v < ‐ 3.0 ‐
3 ‐0.5 < v < +0.5 ‐3.0 < v < ‐0.5 v < ‐3.0
4* +0.5 < v < +3.0 ‐0.5 < v < +0.5 ‐3.0 < v < +0.5
5 v > +3.0 +0.5 < v < +3.0 ‐0.5 < v < +0.5
6 ‐ v > + 3.0 +5.0 < v < +3.0
Attenuation Curves 10
CAT 1
Attenuation (dB)
5
CAT 2
CAT 3
63 Hz 0 CAT 5
CAT 6
-5
-15
(a)
100 500 1000 2000
Distance from source (m)
15
10
Attenuation (dB)
CAT 1
5
CAT 2
CAT 3
125 Hz 0
CAT 5
CAT 6
-5
-10
-15
100 500 1000 2000
(b) Distance from source (m)
15
10
CAT 1
Attenuation (dB)
CAT 2
5
CAT 3
250 Hz 0
-5 CAT 5
CAT 6
-10
-15
100 500 1000 2000
(c) Distance from source (m)
University of Adelaide 59
Meteorological Influences
• Variability in sound level predictions due to
meteorological influences.
Octave band
Distance from source (m)
centre
frequency (Hz) 100 200 500 1,000
(dB)
63 ±1 +4, ‐2 +7, ‐2 +8, ‐2
125 ±1 +4, ‐2 +6, ‐4 +7, ‐4
250 +3, ‐1 +5, ‐3 +6, ‐5 +7, ‐6
500 +3, ‐1 +6, ‐3 +7, ‐5 +9, ‐7
1,000 +7, ‐1 +11, ‐3 +12, ‐5 +12, ‐5
2,000 +2, ‐3 +5, ‐4 +7, ‐5 +7, ‐5
4,000 +2, ‐1 +6, ‐4 +8, ‐6 +9, ‐7
8,000 +2, ‐1 +6, ‐4 +8, ‐6 +9, ‐7
ENC5 p244
University of Adelaide 60
Subjective Assessment of Change in SPL
University of Adelaide 61
• Combined ray tracing
– recent work in this area is focussed on the use of ray tracing of all
reflected sound paths to determine the combined effect of
ground, barriers, meteorological influences (turbulence, wind
and temperature gradients) and air absorption. Too complex to
be practical.
University of Adelaide 62
Accuracy?
• Can expect ± 3 dB for A-weighted levels if all the
procedures discussed are followed.
• The most important effect is the meteorological effect -
this causes ± 10 dB fluctuations in level at distances
greater than 500 m from the noise source.
University of Adelaide 63
Acoustic Enclosures &
Transmission Loss of Panels Carl Howard
Contents of Module
• General TL features and coincidence frequency
• How TL is measured
• STC and RW ratings
• Impact Isolation Class
• How to predict TL of panels
– (isotropic, orthotropic, double wall)
• Composite TL
• Flanking TL
• Use TL to predict the NR of an enclosure
• Enclosure leakage causing reduction of TL
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
Be able to:
• calculate sound transmission loss of single and double
walls
• measure the sound transmission loss of a panel
• calculate STC and Rw rating of a panel
• design an acoustic enclosure
University of Adelaide 4
Typical Enclosures
University of Adelaide 5
Typical Enclosures
University of Adelaide 9
Question …
Consider the steel panel with the cross-section shown in the
figure, having E = 207 GPa and Poisson's ratio < = 0.3.
a) Calculate the bending stiffness in two directions: across the
ribs and along the ribs. The panel thickness is 1.2mm.
b) Calculate the bending wave speed in both directions for the
panel at a frequency of 1000Hz.
c) Calculate the range of critical frequencies for the panel.
d) If the panel is one wall of an enclosure and has dimensions
2m × 2m, calculate its lowest resonance frequency.
e) Calculate the transmission loss for the panel in octave bands
from 63Hz to 8000Hz.
University of Adelaide 11
A Typical Enclosure
Door Seals
Pipe
penetrations
Window
Source Receiver
Side Side
Thin Panel
University of Adelaide 13
Transmission Mechanisms of an
Acoustic Enclosure
Leaks
Structure‐borne flanking
Forced Radiation Total
Bending by Forced Power
Direct Radiated
Sound Response Waves
Sound Interior Enclosure into
Source Sound Wall Receiver
𝑊 Field Reverberant Response Free Radiation Room
Sound Bending by Free 𝑊
1 𝛼 Response Waves
Dissipation Dissipation
in Lining in
𝛼 Structure
University of Adelaide 15
Typical Transmission Loss of a Panel
Coincidence
Region
Mass
Law Damping
Stiffness Controlled
Controlled
Transmission
Loss
First Panel
Resonance
Critical Frequency
Frequency
University of Adelaide 20
A single wall has poor insulation around a
certain frequency
• Near the coincidence frequency, the transmission loss of
a wall is reduced. At 1000Hz, a 1.5mm thick steel plate
has better insulation than a 10mm thick plate.
Thickness (mm)
TL (dB) Steel, Glass, Aluminium
200
60 Concrete
50 100
Plaster, brick,
40 50 chipboard
30
30 20 Lead
20 10
10 5
3
6700 (Hz)
200
500
1000
2000
5000
125 1000 Coincidence
Frequency
University of Adelaide 21
Acoustic Enclosures
• See ENC5 Chapter 7 , p363
• form of path control
• sound is transmitted through wall by bending waves in the wall
– excited by incident pressure field
– propagate parallel to surface
– characterised by displacements normal to surface
– propagation speed, cB frequency dependent
Bending Wavelength
in Panel
University of Adelaide 32
Sound Transmission Loss
• wall critical frequency fc (frequency of poor sound
insulation)
– bending wavelength = acoustic wavelength in air:
𝜆 𝜆 :𝑐 𝑐
𝑐 𝑚 0.55 𝑐
𝑓
2𝜋 𝐵 𝑐 ℎ ENC5 p364
University of Adelaide 33
Coincidence Frequency /
𝐵𝜔
Wavespeed
Speed of bending waves in panel 𝑐
𝑚
Speed of sound
cB c in air c
Frequency
Critical Frequency f
c
= B
University of Adelaide 34
Flat Panel
• Bending stiffness B
– isotropic (flat) panels
𝐸𝐼′ 𝐸ℎ
𝐵
1 𝑣 12 1 𝑣
ENC5 p364
University of Adelaide 35
Orthotropic Panel
• Bending stiffness B
– corrugated panels (orthotropic)
• characterised by a range of bending stiffnesses depending on
direction of bending wave travel in panel
• results in a range of critical frequencies. Thus good sound
transmission over wide frequency range. This is undesirable for
noise control.
ENC5 p367
Reference
A typical cross‐ axis
b1 x2 = x4
section of a h
ribbed panel. zn z1 q2 x3 q4
z2 z4
z3
q2 q4 Neutral
b2 b4
b3 axis
University of Adelaide 36
Orthotropic Panel
• Bending stiffness B
– corrugated panels (orthotropic)
𝐸ℎ ℎ 𝑏 ℎ 𝑏
𝐵 𝑏 𝑧 cos2𝜃 kg m2 s
1 𝑣 ℓ 24 24
University of Adelaide 37
Orthotropic Panel
Neutral axis: bn zn = 0
or if we choose an arbitrary reference axis, then the
distance from the reference axis to the neutral axis, zn, is:
N
xbh
i=1
i i i
zn = N
b h
i=1
i i
University of Adelaide 38
Answer …
a) Calculate the bending stiffness in two directions: across the ribs
and along the ribs. The panel thickness is 1.2mm.
University of Adelaide 39
Answer …
Thus the neutral axis is (30/2 - 2.6=) 12.4mm from the
centre of the top of the section.
The section thickness, h = 1.2mm and the horizontal length,
l, before repeating itself is 250 + 60mm = 0.31m.
The bending stiffness in the direction along the ribs may be
calculated with E = 207GPa and = 0.3 using
𝐸ℎ ℎ 𝑏 ℎ 𝑏
𝐵 𝑏 𝑧 cos2𝜃 kg m2 s
1 𝑣 ℓ 24 24
University of Adelaide 40
Answer …
University of Adelaide 41
Answer …
The bending stiffness per unit width in the direction across
the ribs may be calculated using
Eh3
bn
B=
12 1 v 2 l n
l=0.31m
bn 0.385 m
n
University of Adelaide 42
Answer …
b) Calculate the bending wave speed in both directions for
the panel at a frequency of 1000Hz.
/
𝐵𝜔
The bending wave speed is 𝑐
𝑚
University of Adelaide 43
Thus the lower and upper bending wave speeds
corresponding to waves propagating parallel and
perpendicular to the ribs respectively are:
University of Adelaide 44
Answer …
c) Calculate the range of critical frequencies for the panel.
𝑐 𝑚
𝑓
2𝜋 𝐵
University of Adelaide 45
Transmission Coefficient
transmitted energy
Transmission Coefficient, 𝜏
incident energy
University of Adelaide 46
How is TL measured?
• Measure the SPL in the Source Room Receiver Room
ENC5 p369
University of Adelaide 47
How is TL measured?
• Transmission Loss TL is
ENC5 p369
where
NR is the noise reduction
is the area of the test panel
is the surface area of the room
is the average receiver room absorption
coefficient
Also see Australian Standard AS 1191‐2002 Acoustics – Method for
laboratory measurement of airborne sound insulation of building elements
University of Adelaide 48
Measurement of TL (1/1 or 1/3 octaves)
• panel placed in cavity between Source Receiver
Room
Room
two reverberation chambers
L p1 L p2
• sound introduced in source room 𝐿
measured in receiver room 𝐿
NR (Noise Reduction) 𝐿 𝐿
(frequency dependent)
University of Adelaide 50
Measurement of TL (1/1 or 1/3 octaves)
Source Receiver
Room Room
The power transmitted by panel
L p1 L p2
𝑝 = Av. Incident pressure squared (Pa2)
𝐴 = Area of the panel (m2)
𝜌 = density air (kg/m3)
𝑐 = speed of sound (m/s)
𝜏 = Transmission coefficient (no units)
4𝑊 𝜌 𝑐 1 𝛼 𝑝 𝐴 4𝜌 𝑐 1 𝛼 𝑝 𝐴𝜏 1 𝛼
𝑝 𝜏
𝑆𝛼 4𝜌𝑐 𝑆𝛼 𝑆𝛼
University of Adelaide 52
Measurement of TL (1/1 or 1/3 octaves)
𝑝
𝑁𝑅 10 log
𝑝 𝐴𝜏 1 𝛼
𝑆𝛼
1 1
10 log 10 log
𝐴 1 𝛼 𝜏
𝑆𝛼
𝐴 1 𝛼
10 log 10 log 𝜏
𝑆𝛼
𝐴 1 𝛼
𝑁𝑅 10 log 𝑇𝐿
𝑆𝛼
𝐴 1 𝛼
𝑇𝐿 𝑁𝑅 10 log
𝑆𝛼
University of Adelaide 53
Measurement of TL
Source Receiver
• For testing in acoustic reverberation Room Room
𝐴 1 𝛼
• So we can approximate 𝑇𝐿 𝑁𝑅 10 log
𝑆𝛼
as …
𝐴 TL = Transmission Loss (dB)
𝑇𝐿 𝑁𝑅 10 log NR = Noise Reduction (dB)
𝑆𝛼 A = area of panel (m2)
S = surface area of receiver room (m2)
𝛼 = average receiver room
absorption coefficient (no units)
University of Adelaide 55
Sound Transmission Class (STC)
• single number descriptor of
transmission loss
• horizontal segment from
1250 Hz to 4000 Hz
• middle segment increasing by 5dB
from 400 Hz to 1250 Hz
• low frequency segment increasing by
15 dB from 125 Hz to 400 Hz
• STC rating determined by plotting
1/3 octave band TL vs frequency
• STC contour shifted vertically in
1 dB increments until
– TL curve never more than 8dB below
STC contour
– sum of deficiencies in TL below STC
contour over the 16 1/3-octave bands
does not exceed 32 dB
• STC = value of contour at 500 Hz.
ENC5 p370
University of Adelaide 56
Weighted Sound Reduction Index, Rw
• ISO uses Weighted Sound Reduction Index, Rw
instead of STC
– ISO uses correction terms to account for different types of
incident sound (ENC5 p371).
– the 8 dB criterion (see previous page) does not apply
– Measurements are rounded to nearest 0.1 dB when calculating
deficiencies compared to 1 dB for STC
– standard frequency range for Rw classification is
100 Hz to 3150 Hz (16 – 1/3 octave bands),
compared to
125 Hz to 4000 Hz (16 – 1/3 octave bands) for STC.
See Australian Standard AS/NZS ISO 717.1:2004, (or ISO 717‐1:1996) Acoustics—
Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements. Part 1: Airborne
sound insulation
University of Adelaide 57
Weighted Sound Reduction Index, Rw
AS/NZS ISO 717.1:2004, Figure 1 – Curve of reference values for airborne sound, one‐third octave bands
University of Adelaide 58
Impact Isolation
• Measure of the ability of a construction such as a floor or
ceiling to prevent transmission of impact noise such as
foot steps
– measured using a standard tapping machine
University of Adelaide 59
Lab Testing Using a Tapping Machine
University of Adelaide 60
How is TL Measured?
• TL Test Facilities at EMPA, Zurich, Switzerland
for measuring TL + Flanking in wooden construction
buildings.
Source Room
Wooden Floor
Receiver
Room
University of Adelaide 61
Impact Isolation
• Normalised impact sound
level for each 1/3 octave 65 45
measurement band is:
60
𝑆 α⁄10
50
L n (dB)
calculated from Ln
50 60
– IIC contour shifted
vertically until
45 65
• Ln curve never more than
8dB above IIC contour 1
3
• sum of deficiencies in Ln 40
125 250 500 1k 2k 4k
70
above IIC contour over the 1/3 octave band centre frequency
16 octave bands does not
exceed 32 dB
– IIC = value of contour
at 500 Hz.
ENC5 p373
University of Adelaide 62
Impact Isolation
• ISO has a similar procedure
– terminology is Ln,w instead of IIC
– an additional quantity LnT,w is also defined and based on the
measurements of T60 in the receiving room instead of S
(see ENC p374)
– 8 dB criterion is ignored in both cases
– dB measurements are rounded to the nearest 0.1 dB when
calculating deficiencies instead of 1 dB used for IIC
University of Adelaide 63
Sound Transmission Loss Estimation
• So far we’ve seen:
– the general trends in sound transmission loss,
– how to calculate some important frequencies,
– how to measure the TL,
– how to categorise the TL of a panel using standard curves.
University of Adelaide 64
Sound Transmission Loss Estimation
a) Isotropic b) Orthotropic
(b) orthotropic
(a) Isotropic ve
e
ta
av
mass law c
ro
Transmission loss (dB)
ct
stiffness mass
ro
pe controlled law
pe
stiffness B
d damping damping
dB
controlled e 9 controlled 9
t av controlled
per oc
6 dB
coincidence
coincidence region
region
frequency of first first panel
panel resonance resonance
Frequency (Hz)
Frequency (Hz)
𝜋 𝐵 𝑖 𝑛
𝑓, Hz
2 𝑚 𝑎 𝑏
𝑖, 𝑛 1,2,3, … 𝑓 , = resonance frequency of
panel for mode i,n (Hz)
or 𝐵 = bending stiffness of panel ( kg.m2.s‐2)
𝑚 = mass per unit area of panel ( kg.m‐2)
𝑖 𝑛 𝑖, 𝑛 = modal indices (1,2,3,… N)
𝑓, 0.453 𝑐 ℎ
𝑎 𝑏 𝑎, 𝑏 = side lengths of panel (m)
𝐸 = Young's modulus ( Pa )
𝐼′ = second moment of area per unit width. (m4)
𝐸𝐼′ 𝐸ℎ ℎ = plate thickness (m)
𝐵 𝜈 = Poisson's ratio ( no units)
1 𝑣 12 1 𝑣
ENC5 p376
University of Adelaide 67
Mode shapes of a plate
University of Adelaide 68
Panel Resonance Frequencies
Process of how to calculate panel resonance frequencies
• Write out a table of i,n from 1 to N and calculate 𝑓 ,
𝒊 𝒏 𝒇𝒊,𝒏 ( Hz )
𝜋 𝐵 𝑖 𝑛
1 1 𝑓, Hz
2 𝑚 𝑎 𝑏
2 1
3 1 𝐸ℎ
𝐵
…N 1 12 1 𝑣
1 2 𝐵 = bending stiffness of panel ( kg.m2.s‐2)
2 2 𝐸 = Young's modulus ( Pa )
𝐼′ = second moment of area per unit width. (m4)
3 2
ℎ = plate thickness (m)
…N 2 𝜈 = Poisson's ratio ( no units)
University of Adelaide 72
Transmission Coefficient
• The transmission coefficient depends on the
angle of incidence of the incoming sound wave.
Sound
strikes
Sound panel at
strikes panel 45°
at 90°
𝑓= frequency (Hz)
𝑓 = critical frequency (Hz)
𝑚 = panel surface density (kg/m2)
𝜂 = loss factor of panel (see later)
𝜃 = angle of arrival of plane wave
University of Adelaide 74
Transmission Coefficient
• for an infinite orthotropic panel ENC5 p377
𝑓 𝑓
𝑍 j 2𝜋 𝑓 𝑚 1 cos 𝜗 sin 𝜗 1 j𝜂 sin 𝜃
𝑓 𝑓
𝑓= frequency (Hz)
𝑓 , 𝑓 = critical frequency (Hz)
𝑚 = panel surface density (kg/m2)
𝜂 = loss factor of panel (see later)
𝜃 = angle of arrival of plane wave
𝜐 = angle of arrival of plane wave
University of Adelaide 75
Transmission Coefficient
• Once we have the transmission coefficient for a particular
angle, we need to calculate the overall transmission coefficient
over ALL angles….. Integrate over all angles
1
• for isotropic panels d d sin 2
0
⁄
2
• for orthotropic panels 𝜏 𝑑𝜗 𝜏 𝜃, 𝜗 d sin 𝜃
𝜋
ENC5 p377
University of Adelaide 76
Field Transmission Coefficient, τF
(for panels of finite size)
sin 2 L
• isotropic panels F d sin 2
0
⁄
2
• orthotropic panels 𝜏
𝜋
𝑑𝜗 𝜏 𝜃, 𝜗 𝑑 sin 𝜃
• limiting angle 𝜆
𝜃 cos
2𝜋 𝐴
𝜏= transmission coefficient
𝜃 = angle of arrival of plane wave
𝜗= angle of arrival of plane wave
𝐴 = area of panel (m2)
𝜆 = wavelength of sound (m)
ENC5 p378
University of Adelaide 77
Mass Law Transmission Loss
• for f < fc/2 or fc1/2 (mass law) 𝑍 𝑗2𝜋 𝑓 𝑚
𝜋𝑓𝑚
𝑇𝐿 10 log 1 cos𝜃
𝜌𝑐
– to obtain TLN, set 𝜃 0
University of Adelaide 79
Isotropic Panel Transmission Loss
Point A: ( f/fc = 0.5)
𝑇𝐿 20 log 𝑓 𝑚 54 dB
ve
ve Point B: ( f/fc = 1.0)
ta
cta
oc
o
TL (db)
r er
pe A 𝑇𝐿 20log 𝑓 𝑚 10log 𝜂 44 dB
Bp
dB
6
9d
Point A:
t a er
TL 20 log 𝑓 𝑚 54 dB
oc B p
ve
6d
D Point B:
C
TL (db)
TL 10 log 𝑓 𝑚 16 dB
A B Between B and C:
ta er
oc B p
University of Adelaide 82
Answer …
e) Calculate the transmission loss for the panel in octave
bands from 63Hz to 8000Hz.
t a er
oc B p
ve
6d
D
C
TL (db)
A B
ta er
oc B p
ve
6d
A= 139 Hz, 16.2dB 0.5fC1 fC1 0.5f C2 2f C2
f (Log scale)
University of Adelaide 83
Answer …
At point B (278Hz), the TL is:
t a er
oc B p
ve
6d
D
C
TL (db)
A B
B = 278 Hz, 19.1 dB
ta er
oc B p
ve
6d
0.5fC1 fC1 0.5f C2 2f C2
f (Log scale)
University of Adelaide 84
Answer …
At point C (5,000Hz), the TL is:
t a er
oc B p
ve
6d
D
C
TL (db)
A B
C = 5,000 Hz, 34.4 dB
ta er
oc B p
ve
6d
0.5fC1 fC1 0.5f C2 2f C2
f (Log scale)
University of Adelaide 85
Answer …
At point D (20,000Hz), the TL is:
t a er
oc B p
ve
6d
D
D = 20,000 Hz, 41.4 dB C
TL (db)
A B
ta er
oc B p
ve
6d
0.5fC1 fC1 0.5f C2 2f C2
f (Log scale)
University of Adelaide 86
Answer …
• These points are plotted on the following graph and
interpolation is used to find the octave band TL values.
45
40 TL
35 Point A
Point B
30
Point C
TL [dB]
25 Point D
20
15
10
5
0
10 100 1000 10000
Frequency [Hz]
University of Adelaide 87
Answer …
• Strictly speaking, the curve should only be used to find
1/3 octave values and the octave band levels must then
be calculated from the following equation:
1 / / /
TL 10 log 10 10 10
3
• However, for most practical purposes, the results
obtained that way are little different to the results
obtained by reading the octave band levels directly from
the figure. However, in the case of isotropic panels, care
should be taken to avoid errors near the dip in the curve
corresponding to the critical frequency. Following the
figure, the octave band results are summarised in a table.
ENC5 p380
University of Adelaide 88
Answer …
University of Adelaide 89
Panel Loss Factor η
• See ENC5 App C for values of loss factor η
• Very dependent on panel boundary conditions
• Can be calculated from time for panel vibrations to decay
by 60 dB after cessation of excitation ( T60)
2.2
𝜂
𝑓𝑇
University of Adelaide 90
Double Walls
University of Adelaide 91
Light double walls provide good sound
insulation
• Two lightweight walls separated by an air gap provide
good transmission loss. The TL increases as the spacing
increases. Double walls can provide the same TL as a
single wall that is 5x to 10x as heavy.
TL TL TL
37dB 47dB 55dB
University of Adelaide 92
Double walls should have few connections
University of Adelaide 93
Double Walls
• Double glazed windows are another example.
University of Adelaide 94
Double Wall TL
• Double wall construction is perhaps the most common
building construction.
• Top down view
𝑚 , 𝑚 = surface densities in kg / m2
d = gap width in m
L = longest cavity dimension in m
• Limiting Frequency 𝑓ℓ 𝑐 ⁄2 𝜋𝑑
TL 𝑀 𝑚 𝑚 𝑓 𝑓
TL TL TL 20 log 𝑓𝑑 29 𝑓 𝑓 𝑓ℓ
TL TL 6 𝑓 𝑓ℓ
TL 10log 1 𝜋 𝑓 𝑚⁄ 𝜌𝑐 5.5 dB
TL 20 log 𝜋 𝑓 𝑚⁄ 𝜌𝑐 10 log 2𝜂 𝑓 ⁄ 𝜋𝑓 dB
• Acoustical isolation
Fibreglass or rockwool in cavity
• Mechanical isolation
Difficult to achieve especially at edges
Panels usually attached to studs - point or line support.
B
C
f0 f f 0.5 fc1 fc 2
Frequency (Hz) (log scale)
ENC4 p379, ENC5 p389
University of Adelaide 98
Design Chart For TL of a Double Panel Wall
Panels are numbered so that 𝑓 is
always less than or equal to 𝑓
m1 and m2 (kg m-2) are the
respective panel surface densities
d(m) is the spacing between panels
b(m) is the spacing between line
supports
oct . e(m) is the spacing of an assumed
/
dB rectangular grid between point
.
ct
f c 1 < fc 2 12 12 dB/oct.
/o
supports
D dB
15
TL (dB)
/o c
speed of sound in air and
/ oct
6 dB
6 dB
/o ct. h is the panel thickness
A
η1 and η2 are the loss factors
f0 fR fR 0.5 fc1 fc 2 respectively for panels 1 and 2.
Frequency (Hz) (log scale)
ENC4 p379, ENC5 p389
University of Adelaide 99
Double Wall TL
• POINT A: f 0 = 80 m1 m2 /dm1 m2 (Hz)
TLA 20 log10 m1 m2 + 20 log10 f 0 48 (dB)
• POINT C:
(a) f c f c ,
2 1 f c 2
TLc TLB 6 10 log10 2 20 log10 (dB)
f c1
(b) fc fc ,
2 1
TLc TLB 6 10 log10 2 5 log101 (dB)
• POINT D: f = 55 /d
ENC4 p379, ENC5 p389
University of Adelaide 100
Double Wall TL: Point B:
The transmission loss, TLB, at Point B is:
– equal to TLB1 if no sound absorptive material is placed in the
cavity between the two panels;
TLB1 = TLA 20 log10 f c1 / f 0 20 log10 f c1 / f 22 (dB)
– otherwise TLB = TLB2
(a) Line-line support:
TLB2 20 log10 m1 10 log10 b 20 log10 f c1 10 log10 f c2
m f1 2
2 c1
+ 20 log10 1 78 (dB)
m1 f 1 2
c2
Davy does allow for the use of flexible steel studs as well whereas
Sharp only considers rigid wooden studs.
t.
B
oc
3.0m 2.44m 0.1m
/
dB
60
15
t.
Transmission loss (dB)
/o c
50
6d
B
C
spacing
m1 = m2 = 12.67 kg/m2
t.
/o c
40
dB
f c1 f c2 2500 Hz
18
.
30 / oct measured
B
6d calculated
STAGGERED STUDS
Panels only connected at edges but performance not as good as edge supported with
no studs. In this case add 2dB to TLB of the design chart.
If panels are well damped, adding 4dB to TLB will give conservative predictions.
Through door
Through walls
Air vents
University of Adelaide 114
Composite Transmission Loss See p395 in textbook
τ1 = 10-30/10 = 0.001
τ2 = 10-20/10= 0.01
τ3 = 10-15/10= 0.0316
0.001 30 0.01 1 0.0316 2
0.00313
. 33
TL 10 log10 τ=25 dB
ENC5 p398
University of Adelaide 115
Flanking Transmission Loss
• where 10
TL flank Dn. f 10 log10
A
Sα
Dn. f L1 L2 10 log10
10
If the field arrangement is different to the laboratory set up,
then the value of Dn,f must be adjusted as illustrated for a
suspended ceiling on page 397 of the text.
ENC5 p406
University of Adelaide 117
Checkpoint ….
So far we have covered:
• How to calculate the TL of single and double wall panels.
• How to experimentally measure the TL of a panel.
• How to calculate the composite TL from multiple paths
to determine the overall TL.
1 2
3 4
ENC5 p408
University of Adelaide 123
Enclosure Noise Reduction
• sound pressure, p2, at some distance from enclosure
– enclosure outdoors in free space
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑆 10 log 𝐷 ⁄4 𝜋𝑟 dB
Normally for an enclosure located outdoors, on hard ground 𝐷 2
– enclosure indoors
𝐷 4 1 α
𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑆 10 log dB
4𝜋𝑟 𝑆α
• no enclosure 𝐷 4 1 α
𝐿 𝐿 10 log dB
4𝜋𝑟 𝑆α
• enclosure noise reduction
NR 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 10 log 𝑆 dB
TL 𝐶 dB ENC5 p410
University of Adelaide 124
Enclosure Noise Reduction
• Values of constant C (dB) to account for enclosure
internal acoustic conditions.
Enclosure internal
acoustic conditions 63 125 250 500 1,000 2,000 4,000 8,000
live* 18 16 15 14 12 12 12 12
fairly live 13 12 11 12 12 12 12 12
average 13 11 9 7 5 4 3 3
dead 11 9 7 6 5 4 3 3
ENC5 408
University of Adelaide 125
Enclosure Noise Reduction
Use the following criteria to determine the appropriate acoustical
conditions inside the enclosure:
% sound absorbent 10 20 30 50 70
Performance reduction (dB) -10 -7 -5 -3 -1.5
Pipe
penetrations
need seals
Air Intake
ENC p406
University of Adelaide 130
Practical Matters for Enclosures
See ENC p414 in textbook
• Vibration Isolation:
– Classic mistakes made here.
– Need to vibration isolate pipes from walls.
– Need to isolate machinery from walls.
ENC5 p414
University of Adelaide 131
Practical Matters for Enclosures
• Enclosure Resonances:
– Panel Resonances
• vary mass or stiffness
– Acoustic Resonances
• add porous acoustic absorbent
Engineering Acoustics
Barriers and Pipe Wrapping
Contents
• Design of acoustic barriers
• Pipe Wrapping
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
Be able to:
• design an acoustic barrier
• determine the IL of a pipe wrapping
University of Adelaide 4
Examples of Barriers – Traffic Noise
From: http://www.connecteast.com.au
University of Adelaide 5
Examples of Barriers – Traffic Noise
• Freeways - Melbourne
University of Adelaide 6
Examples of Barriers – Traffic Noise
• Roads – South Rd & ANZAC Highway intersection
University of Adelaide 7
Noise Barriers in U.S.A.
• According to the US Federal Highway Administration,
as of 2010, there were 4424 linear kilometres (!!)
of noise barriers built in the U.S., at a total cost of
$5.44 billion in 2010 dollars.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/noise_barriers/inventory/summary/sintro7.cfm
https://medium.com/re‐form/muting‐
the‐freeway‐e18ee195bd38
University of Adelaide 9
Examples of Barriers – Train Noise
• Barrier next to train line
University of Adelaide 10
Examples of Barriers – Plant Noise
• Roof top barrier
University of Adelaide 11
Examples of Indoor Barriers See ENC5 p419
• Indoor barrier
University of Adelaide 12
Examples of Indoor Barriers
• Cube farm – Indoor barrier
University of Adelaide 13
Numerical Modelling
SoundPlan software used to model effect of noise barrier
University of Adelaide 18
Numerical Modelling
SoundPlan software used to model effect of noise barrier
University of Adelaide 19
Numerical Modelling
SoundPlan software used to model effect of noise barrier
Cross sectional noise control plot showing noise “shadow” behind
the barrier, which reduces noise on the nearby house.
University of Adelaide 20
Sound Barriers
See ENC5 p265
Barrier of
Source at height, hb
(XS ,YS ,hS ) A
B
d Receiver at
hb (XR ,YR ,hR )
YS
YR
Y
XS XR
X
University of Adelaide 21
Sound Barriers
Diffraction over a thin sheet (ENC5 p265)
Fresnel Number N:
𝑁 2⁄𝜆 𝐴 𝐵 𝑑
⁄
𝑑 𝑋 𝑌 ℎ ℎ
⁄
𝐴 𝑋 𝑌 ℎ ℎ
⁄
𝐵 𝑋 𝑌 ℎ ℎ
𝑋
𝑌 𝑌
𝑋
𝑋
𝑌 𝑌
𝑋
University of Adelaide 22
See ENC5 p266, Fig 5.16
Sound Barriers
University of Adelaide 24
Sound Barriers
• Then use ENC5 p265
University of Adelaide 25
Sound Barriers
• Alternative calculation to preceding graph.
𝐴 IL IL IL IL 𝐷 𝐷
where
2𝜋𝑁
𝐼𝐿 20log 1
tanh 2𝜋𝑁
𝐼𝐿 6tanh 𝑁 2 𝐼𝐿 1 tanh 10𝑁
𝑁
𝐼𝐿 20log 1 tanh 0.6log
𝑁
ENC5 p266
University of Adelaide 26
Sound Barriers
where
N2 =Fresnel number for a wave travelling from the image source to
the receiver where the image source is generated by reflection from
the barrier (not the ground).
ENC p414
University of Adelaide 27
Sound Barriers
ENC5 p266
University of Adelaide 28
Outdoor Barriers
• Assume incoherent combination of sound fields arriving from all
propagation paths.
Barrier source - receiver paths
• No Barrier
– 2 possible paths
• Infinite Length Barrier
– 4 possible paths
• Finite Length Barrier
– 8 possible paths
Barrier lined with acoustically porous material
• Some beneficial effect, dependent on:
– barrier height
– barrier distance from source
– barrier distance from receiver
University of Adelaide 29
Sound Paths Over And Around Barriers
• over top
See ENC5 p267
bar r i
er
• around sides R
S O
See ENC5 p268 A B
O B
gr ou O
nd A
h
nd
gro u
University of Adelaide 30
hb = height of point O above the ground
X R hs X S hr
hb
XS XR
nA
Ab 10 log10 1 10 ARw 10 10 log10 10 Abi ARi 10
i=1
AR 20 log10 R p
ENC5 p269
University of Adelaide 32
Correction in 4th edition of textbook, on page 415,
it has written:
When paths involving one or more ground reflections are
considered, the straight line distance, d, used in Equation (8.101) is the
same as for non-reflected waves as the Fresnel number and associated
noise reduction are relative to the straight line propagation from S to R.
University of Adelaide 33
Extract from journal paper… Maekawa, Z. (1968), “Noise Reductions by Screens”,
Applied Acoustics, vol 1, p157‐173.
University of Adelaide 35
Sound Barriers
See ENC5 p273
Illustration of acoustic path for a positive
• effects of wind and vertical sonic gradient
temperature gradients Curved sound
Wind Top of barrier
ray trace
– radius of curvature of Effective
source position
sound wave
r c0 Gs (m) Hb
h'S A
RS
Source R'S
where the total sonic
Rc
gradient, Gs is
Gs 0.015U 10.29 Tg 10Tg T0 273 1 2
University of Adelaide 36
Sound Barriers
University of Adelaide 37
ISO Approach To Barrier Insertion Loss
Assumptions
• Obstacle mass must be greater than 10 kg/m
• No large cracks or gaps
• Obstacle length normal to the line between source and
receiver should be greater than a wavelength.
University of Adelaide 38
ISO Approach To Barrier Insertion Loss
• Normally only propagation path over the top of the
barrier is considered.
• Octave band excess attenuation for diffraction over the
top edge of the barrier
𝐴 𝐷 𝐴 0 dB 𝑖 1
and for diffraction around the two vertical ends of the
barrier
𝐴 𝐷 0 dB 𝑖 2, 3
where 𝐴 is ground attenuation in the absence of the
barrier.
𝐷 10 log 3 𝐶 ⁄𝜆 𝐶 𝐾 Δ𝑧 dB
University of Adelaide 39
ISO Approach To Barrier Insertion Loss
where
𝐴 = ground attenuation in the absence of the barrier (dB)
𝐶 = 20 for diffraction over the top 𝑖 1 ,
𝐶 = 40 for diffraction around the ends of the barrier 𝑖 2, 3
𝐶 = 1 for single edge diffraction
𝜆 = wavelength of sound at the octave band centre frequency (Hz)
Δ𝑧 𝐴 𝐵 𝑑 = difference between line‐of‐sight distance between source
and receiver and the path length over the top or around the side of the barrier
(m)
𝐾 = meteorological correction factor for downwind propagation.
University of Adelaide 40
ISO Approach To Barrier Insertion Loss
For multiple paths
nA
Ab 10 log10 10 Abi ARi 10
i=1
ENC5 p283
University of Adelaide 41
Double Barriers
See ENC5 p271
double edge
barrier of
height h
b
source at
(XS,YS,ZS) A e
B
d
receiver at
hb (XR,YR,ZR)
YS
a ZR = hr
Y YR
XS b XR
University of Adelaide 42
ISO Approach To Barrier Insertion Loss
See ENC5 p285
University of Adelaide 43
Indoor Barriers See ENC5 p419
D 4
IL 10 log10 original room ASSUMPTIONS
4 πr 2
S
o o
• TL through barrier ignored
DF 4 K1 K 2
10 log10 new room • Lw radiated by source not
4πr
2
S 1 K1 K 2
affected by barrier
1 • Receiver is in shadow zone
F , i edges of barrier
i 3+10 N i
• Incoherent combination of
sound from all propagation
K1
S
; S is open area around barrier paths.
S S11
S
K2 ; S11 , S 2 2 include barrier MULTIPLE BARRIERS
S S2 2
• See qualitative statements
ENC5 p419.
University of Adelaide 44
Example Barrier Design
8.22: Calculate the noise reduction (in dB(A)) due to
inserting a 4m high thin barrier, 15m in length midway
between a noisy refrigeration unit and a residence located
50m from the unit across an asphalt covered lot.
Assume that the acoustic centre of the refrigeration unit is
0.5m above the ground and the community location is 1.5m
above ground level.
University of Adelaide 45
Example Barrier Design ….cont’d
Without the barrier the noise levels due to the refrigeration
unit in the octave bands between 63Hz and 8kHz were
measured respectively as:
70, 75, 72, 60, 58, 56, 50, 52dB.
Use Fig. 5.2 in ENC5 to calculate the ground reflection
loss, assuming that no wind or temperature gradients exist
and that sound from all paths combines incoherently at the
receiver.
University of Adelaide 46
Solution
• Step 1 --- draw some diagrams of the situation
University of Adelaide 47
Solution
• Step 1 --- draw some diagrams of the situation
University of Adelaide 48
Solution
• Step 2: Calculate the angles
University of Adelaide 49
Solution
• Step 3: Calculate the loss from the ground reflection.
University of Adelaide 50
Solution
• Step 4: Calculate angles for all paths.
University of Adelaide 51
Solution
University of Adelaide 52
Solution
University of Adelaide 53
University of Adelaide 54
University of Adelaide 55
Solution
University of Adelaide 56
Pipe Wrappings
University of Adelaide 57
Pipe Wrappings
• Sound insulation for waste pipes
University of Adelaide 58
Pipe Wrappings
University of Adelaide 59
Pipe Lagging Insertion Loss Prediction
See ENC5 p420 in textbook
• calculate fc and fr
𝑓 0.53𝑐 ⁄𝑐 ℎ critical frequency
𝑓 𝑐 ⁄𝜋𝑑 ring frequency
University of Adelaide 60
Pipe Lagging Insertion Loss Prediction
• Low frequency range below jacket ring 𝑓 ENC5 p422
IL 10 log 1 0.012𝑋 sin 2𝐶 0.012𝑋 sin 𝐶
where
𝑋 1000 𝑚⁄𝑑 ⁄ 𝜁 𝜁 ⁄ 2𝑑⁄ ℓ𝜁
30𝜁 ℓ
𝐶
𝑑
𝑓 = octave or 1/3 octave band centre frequency (Hz)
𝑓 = ring frequency (Hz)
𝜁 𝑓 ⁄𝑓
𝑑 = diameter of the jacket ( m )
𝑚 = jacket surface density (kg m‐2)
ℓ = absorptive material thickness (m)
𝑐 = longitudinal wave speed (thin panel) in jacket material (m/s)
University of Adelaide 61
Pipe Lagging Insertion Loss Prediction
• Mid frequency range between 𝑓 and 𝑓 ENC5 p422
IL 10 log 1 0.012𝑋 sin 2𝐶 0.012𝑋 sin 𝐶
where
𝑋 226 𝑚⁄ℎ ⁄ 𝜁 1 𝜁 258ℎ⁄ ℓ𝜁
0.232𝜁 ℓ
𝐶
ℎ
𝑓 = octave or 1/3 octave band centre frequency (Hz)
𝑓 = jacket critical frequency (Hz)
𝜁 𝑓 ⁄𝑓
ℎ = jacket thickness ( m )
𝑚 = jacket surface density (kg m‐2)
ℓ = absorptive material thickness (m)
University of Adelaide 62
Pipe Lagging Insertion Loss Prediction
• High frequency range above critical frequency 𝑓 ENC5 p422
IL 10 log 1 0.012𝑋 sin 2𝐶 0.012𝑋 sin 𝐶
where
⁄ ⁄
𝑋 41.6 𝑚⁄ℎ 𝜁 1 1/𝜁 258ℎ⁄ ℓ𝜁
0.232𝜁 ℓ
𝐶
ℎ
𝑓 = octave or 1/3 octave band centre frequency (Hz)
𝑓 = jacket critical frequency (Hz)
𝜁 𝑓 ⁄𝑓
ℎ = jacket thickness ( m )
𝑚 = jacket surface density (kg m‐2)
ℓ = absorptive material thickness (m)
University of Adelaide 63
Pipe Lagging Insertion Loss Prediction
• A simpler formula, provides an upper bound to the
expected insertion loss at 𝑓 300 Hz
40 𝑓 𝑚ℓ
𝐼𝐿 log
1 0.12/𝐷 132
ENC5 p422
University of Adelaide 64
Pipe Lagging
Typical pipe lagging 50
insertion loss for 50
70 - 90 kg/m2 with a
30
lead aluminium jacket
of 6 kg/m2 surface
20
density. The I symbols
represent experimental 10
variation for 3 pipe
diameters (75, 150 and 0
300 mm). 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Octave band centre frequency (Hz)
ENC5 p421
University of Adelaide 65
Example
• 8.28 Calculate the insertion loss in octave bands between
63Hz and 8kHz due to wrapping a 200mm diameter steel
pipe with a 100mm layer of 90kgm-3 glass fibre covered
with an aluminium jacket weighing 6kgm-2.
University of Adelaide 66
Solution
• Follow the procedure on ENC5 p421-422.
• Step 1: Draw a diagram
University of Adelaide 67
Solution
• Step 2:
University of Adelaide 68
Solution
• Calculate the ring frequency
University of Adelaide 69
Solution
• For the Insertion Loss calculations, we use ENC5 p422,
Eq. 7.124, or ENC4 p430 Eq. 8.136 for octave bands of
4000Hz and below and ENC5 Eq. 7.127, ENC4 Eq. 8.139,
for the 8000Hz octave band.
• The results of the calculations are summarised in the
table below at octave band centre frequencies.
Of course, if three 1/3 octave bands are averaged, then
the result would be slightly different.
• In addition, ENC5 Eq 7.132 has also been used to
generate an alternative set of Insertion Loss predictions.
University of Adelaide 70
Solution
University of Adelaide 71
Solution
• With ENC5 p422 Eq 7.132, the Insertion Loss is given by:
University of Adelaide 72
Summary
• Theory for barrier design, NR and SPL predictions.
• Example of barrier calculation.
• Theory for IL of Pipe lagging.
• Example of pipe lagging problem.
University of Adelaide 73
Carl Howard
Mufflers
Contents
• Examples of silencers
• How do they work?
• Classification: reactive vs dissipative
• Noise Reduction NR, Transmission Loss TL, Insertion
Loss IL
• Acoustic impedance analysis of reactive mufflers
• Lined duct silencers
• Pressure drop calculations
• Exhaust stack directivity
University of Adelaide 3
Learning Outcomes
Be able to:
• Define IL, TL, NR
• Classify a muffler as reactive, dissipative, or combination
• Estimate the IL, TL, NR of reactive and dissipative
mufflers
University of Adelaide 4
References
• Engineering Noise Control 5th ed, Ch. 8, p423
• Munjal (2014), Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers
• Jacobsen Moller-Juhl, Fundamentals of General Linear
Acoustics, Ch. 7 Duct acoustics, p. 75
• Ver and Beranek, Noise and Vibration Control
Engineering, Ch. 9, p. 279
• Physclips:
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/sound-
impedance-intensity.htm
University of Adelaide 5
Automotive
• Mufflers
University of Adelaide 6
Automotive
• Intake silencers
University of Adelaide 7
Industrial
University of Adelaide 9
Architectural
University of Adelaide 10
Architectural
University of Adelaide 11
Air-Conditioning
https://nringabet.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/
duct_connected_01.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RJWXUEmmvTk/maxresdefault.jpg
http://hpac.com/site‐files/hpac.com/files/archive/hpac.com/fastrack/Terzigni_Fig_2.gif
University of Adelaide 12
Aerospace
• Boeing 787 Dreamliner http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZRKm6PG918
https://engineering.purdue.edu/~propulsi/propulsion/jets/basics/noise.html
University of Adelaide 13
From lecture on Noise Control
Application
• Equipment room West of The Hub
University of Adelaide 15
Research Facilities
• KTH University Stockholm, Sweden
No reflections
Reflection when
area increases
Reflection at
branch in duct
University of Adelaide 17
From lecture on Noise Control
Lined Duct
Expansion
Chamber
Contraction
Helmholtz
Resonator
Spring
Mass
University of Adelaide 18
From lecture on Noise Control
Dissipative mufflers are effective over a
broad range of frequencies
• The thickness and spacing of absorptive material effects
the frequencies that are absorbed. The thicker the
material, the lower the frequency that is absorbed.
Smaller spacing is used for higher frequencies.
Thick absorptive
Thick material, small
absorptive spacing
material,
large spacing
University of Adelaide 19
Classification of Muffling Devices ENC5 p.428
• REACTIVE
– expansion chambers and small holes
– suppress noise generation by modifying impedance seen by
source
– low frequency devices
• DISSIPATIVE
– Uses sound absorbing material (fuzz)
– Attenuates mid- to high- frequency noise
University of Adelaide 20
Classification of Muffling Devices ENC5 p. 428
Table 8.1
University of Adelaide 21
Measures of Performance ENC5 p. 424
Insertion Loss IL
– defined as the reduction (in decibels) in sound power
transmitted through a duct compared to that transmitted with
no muffler in place.
– Provided that the duct outlet remains at a fixed point in space,
the insertion loss will be equal to the noise reduction that would
be expected at a reference point external to the duct outlet as a
result of installing the muffler.
University of Adelaide 22
Measures of Performance ENC5 p. 424
• Insertion Loss IL
– same as noise reduction at a location near duct exit,
provided muffler does not cause exit to move.
– defined as difference in sound pressure at a location in the duct
downstream from the muffler before and after insertion of the
muffler.
– used to describe performance of reactive devices whose
performance is dependent on impedances of source and duct
termination.
University of Adelaide 23
Measures of Performance
• Insertion Loss IL
: :
𝐿 : = sound power level at distance from exit without muffler (dB re 1pW)
𝐿 : = sound power level at distance from exit with muffler (dB re 1pW)
, ,
University of Adelaide 24
Measures of Performance ENC5 p. 424
University of Adelaide 25
Transmission Loss TL
Pincident Ptransmitted
• Straight duct
– Waves unaffected
Anechoic termination
Pincident Ptransmitted
• Duct with muffler
– Sound is reflected
at impedance change
+ Anechoic termination
University of Adelaide 26
Transmission Loss TL
• Transmission Loss (TL)
– TL can be used to describe dissipative mufflers for which
IL TL provided TL>5 dB as these do not affect source radiated
power.
: :
𝐿 : = sound power incident on muffler (dB re 1pW)
𝐿 : = sound power transmitted at exit of muffler (dB re 1pW)
University of Adelaide 27
Transmission Loss TL
Question:
How can one separate the incident and reflected wave
power as a microphone will only measure the total sound
pressure?
Answer:
A microphone placed upstream would measure the total
pressure (incident + reflected).
University of Adelaide 28
Two Microphone Method
• Described in standard:
ASTM E1050 (1998). Standard test method for impedance and absorption of
acoustical materials using a tube, two microphones, and a digital frequency analysis
system.
Ai
Ar
University of Adelaide 29
Measures of Performance
• Noise Reduction NR (or Level Difference LD) ENC5 p. 425
– Difference in SPL measured upstream and downstream of the
silencer.
: :
𝐿 : = sound pressure level upstream of muffler (dB re 20Pa)
𝐿 : = sound pressure level downstream of muffler (dB re 20Pa)
𝐿 : 𝐿 :
University of Adelaide 30
Noise Reduction NR
• Noise Reduction NR (or Level Difference LD) ENC5 p. 425
– The measurement of NR does not require anechoic duct
terminations and does not require knowledge of the source
impedance.
– It is the easiest of the three metric to measure in practice.
University of Adelaide 31
Measures of Performance
• The performance of reactive devices is dependent on the
impedances of the source and termination (outlet).
In general, a reactive device will strongly affect the
generation of sound at the source. This has the effect that
the TL and IL of reactive devices may be very different.
• The performance of dissipative devices, on the other
hand, by the very nature of the mode of operation, tends
to be independent of the effects of source and
termination impedance.
• Provided that the TL of a dissipative muffler is at least
5 dB, it may be assumed that the IL and the TL are the
same.
University of Adelaide 32
From lecture on Fundamentals
Impedance
𝐹 𝑝𝐴
• MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE 𝑍
𝑢 𝑢
used to describe sound radiation from a vibrating structure
𝑝
• SPECIFIC ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE 𝑍
𝑢
used to describe propagation of sound in free space, reflection and
transmission of sound at interfaces between media.
𝑝 𝑝
• ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE 𝑍
𝑢𝑆 𝑣
used to describe propagation in ducts and mufflers.
ENC5 p. 45
University of Adelaide 33
Impedance
• where
𝐹 = force (N, Units 𝑀𝐿𝑇 )
𝑢 = acoustic particle velocity (m/s, Units 𝐿𝑇 )
𝑝 = pressure (Pa, Units 𝑀𝑇 𝐿 )
𝑣 = acoustic volume velocity (m3/s, Units 𝐿 𝑇 )
𝑆 = area (m2, Units 𝐿 )
University of Adelaide 34
Reactive Muffler Examples
S
LQWT V
Sduct L S Sduct
u d u d
Quarter Wavelength Tube Helmholtz Resonator Contraction
L S1
Duct 1 u d
Lu Ld Duct 2
Ød1
Double Tuned Ød2 Perforated tube
Expansion Chamber Concentric Tube Resonator
University of Adelaide 35
Reactive Mufflers: Analysis
• Two common methods
– Impedance method
– 4-pole transmission line (not covered in this course,
see Munjal [2014] Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers, ENC 5th ed )
University of Adelaide 36
Reactive Mufflers: Analysis
• Acoustical to Electrical Analogies
Acoustical Electrical
Pressure Voltage
Mass Inductance
Compliance Capacitance
Resistance Resistance
University of Adelaide 37
Reactive Mufflers: Analysis
• Acoustic Analogies of Kirchhoff’s Laws ENC5 p.438
– Acoustic volume velocity inflow at a point must equal the
outflow.
– Acoustic pressure drops around any closed loop must add up to
zero.
University of Adelaide 39
Reactive Mufflers: Analysis
• Example of an “electrical” circuit analogy of an
(side-branch) acoustic muffler. ENC5 Fig 8.7, p. 439
(b)
Zu
(a) Volume V
Area S, length R
p,v v1 Zs Zd
v2
Sound
University of Adelaide 40
Resonator Insertion Loss Analysis
*1
University of Adelaide 41
Resonator Insertion Loss Analysis
• Insertion Loss (IL)
acoustic power flow through
system into load before
IL 10log insertion of device
acoustic power flow after
insertion of device
𝑣 𝑍
IL 20log 20log 1 dB ENC5 p. 442
𝑣 𝑍
* for a constant volume velocity source
𝑍 = downstream duct impedance (Pa s / m3)
𝑍 = side‐branch duct impedance (Pa s / m3)
𝑣 = acoustic volume velocity (m3/s, Units 𝐿 𝑇 )
University of Adelaide 42
Resonator Insertion Loss Analysis
• Constant pressure source
– Fan, centrifugal pump
• Insertion Loss
𝑍𝑍 𝑍𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍
IL 20 log 20 log 1
𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍
ENC5 p.442
University of Adelaide 43
Transmission Loss Due to Side-Branch
ENC5 p.443
• TL is defined as
power flow into device
TL 10 log dB
power flow out of device
University of Adelaide 44
Transmission Loss Due to Side-Branch
• When considering only plane-waves in a duct,
TL of side-branch is
𝜌𝑐
TL 20 log 1 dB
2𝑆 𝑍 ENC5 p.444
University of Adelaide 45
Side-Branch Resonator
• Examples of side-branch resonator types:
S
LQWT
Sduct
u d
Quarter Wavelength Tube
V
L S Sduct
u d
Helmholtz Resonator
University of Adelaide 46
Quarter-Wavelength Tube
Description Parameter Value Units
• Question:
At what frequency would you expect the maximum
attenuation to occur for the QUARTER WAVELENGTH
tube?
HINT: Look at lecture on fundamentals for formula.
University of Adelaide 47
Quarter-Wavelength Tube
• QWT (side-branch) impedance is
j𝜌𝑐 𝜌 = density of gas (kg / m3)
𝑍 cot𝑘ℓ 𝑅 𝑐 = speed of sound (m / s)
𝑆 𝑘 = wavenumber ( 2𝜋𝑓/𝑐
ENC5 p. 438 𝑆 = cross‐sectional area of QWT (m2)
ℓ = effective length of QWT (m)
𝑅 = acoustic resistance
University of Adelaide 49
Quarter-Wavelength Tube
• Look at the circuit diagram again.
University of Adelaide 50
Acoustic Resistance
• Consider a blob of air moving through a small orifice
University of Adelaide 52
Acoustic Resistance
• For an orifice or tube of length w ENC5 p. 435
𝜌𝑐 𝑘𝑡𝐷𝑤 5 4𝑆 𝑆𝑘
𝑅 1 𝛾 1 0.288𝑘𝑡 log 𝜀 0.7𝑀
𝑆 2𝑆 3𝛾 𝜋ℎ 2𝜋
University of Adelaide 54
Helmholtz Resonator
• Resonance Frequency 𝜔 𝑐 𝑆 ⁄ℓ 𝑉 ENC5 p. 439
3ℓ 𝑆 ℓ 𝑆 3ℓ 𝑆 ℓ 𝑆 3𝑆
𝜔 𝑐 ENC5 p. 439
2ℓ 𝑆 2ℓ 𝑆 ℓ 𝑆 ℓ
University of Adelaide 55
Quarter-Wavelength Tube
• Complicated configurations can be analysed using FEA
Finite Element Analysis
Howard and Cazzolato (2014), Acoustic Analyses Using Matlab and Ansys, p. 183
University of Adelaide 58
Quarter-Wavelength Tube
𝑍 𝑍 𝑍 𝑍
University of Adelaide 67
Termination Impedance
• long pipe downstream 𝐿 ≫ 𝜆 c
Zd ZL
(no flow), is near anechoic S
University of Adelaide 69
Optimum Location of Resonator
• Place the side-branch resonator at a pressure maximum
in the duct. ENC p. 452
• where Zd is maximum:
2𝑛 1
– odd multiple of λ/4 from end of duct ℓ 𝜆
4
University of Adelaide 70
Resonator Silencers
• Multiple Helmholtz and Quarter-
Wavelength resonator silencers of
varying dimensions can be resonator splitter
(a)
airway
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 23 26 29 31
20 22 24 25 27 30 32
8 13 21 28
38 48 51 52 55
36 41 42 44 46 58
33 34 37 49 53 54 56
35 39 40 43 45 47
50 57
Exhaust stack silencer design using finite element analysis , Carl Q. Howard, Ben S. Cazzolato,
Colin H. Hansen (2000), Noise Control Engineering Journal, 48 (4), p113‐120.
University of Adelaide 71
From lecture on Noise Control
Industrial
• Reactive Silencer for Power Station
Exhaust stack silencer design using finite element analysis , Carl Q. Howard, Ben S. Cazzolato,
Colin H. Hansen (2000), Noise Control Engineering Journal, 48 (4), p113‐120.
University of Adelaide 72
Resonator Silencers
• Two types
– no sound absorbing material
– sound absorbing material in each resonator
University of Adelaide 73
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
ENC5 p.448
L
• Very common muffler is
simple expansion chamber.
• Assume 𝐿 𝜆/2 Sduct Sduct
Sexpansion
(a) x y
where lengths 𝑥 𝑦 0 b
b
(b)
Za
University of Adelaide 74
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
𝑍 𝑍
• constant volume velocity source IL 20 log 1
𝑍
ENC5 p. 449
University of Adelaide 75
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
• short tail pipe, length ℓ 𝜆/4
– constant volume velocity source
Zc + ZL j V
R R j
c
tan k
Zb c 2 c L
A
e
j c 2
Zb
V
0 c A e V
c
Q e AV
RA
2
Zc + ZL j
0Q
Zb 0
IL = 10 log10 1 0 Q
2 2 2
0 2
IL 0 20 log10 Q negative
University of Adelaide 76
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
• Example of performance
loudspeaker microphone
11 cm
V
50 cm 20 cm 35 cm
20
U = 70 ms-1
Insertion loss, IL (dB)
10
0
-1
U = 30 ms
-10
U=0
-20
University of Adelaide
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
L
• Transmission loss
( Assume 𝐿 𝜆/2 )
S duct S duct
S expansion
1 𝑆 𝑆
TL 10 log 1 sin 𝑘𝐿
4 𝑆 𝑆
ENC5 p. 453
University of Adelaide 78
Simple Expansion Chamber Silencer
L
La Lb
Lc
Sduct Sduct
Sexpansion
ENC5 p. 471
University of Adelaide 80
Double Tuned Expansion Chamber
Not covered in this course
Low SPL
University of Adelaide 81
Concentric Tube Resonator
Not covered in this course
L
Lupstream La Lc Lb Ldownstream
Duct 1 u d
Ø d1 Duct 2
Ø d2 Perforated tube
ENC5 p. 472
University of Adelaide 82
Pressure Drop Estimates ENC5 p. 502
• Discontinuities P (1 / 2) U K
2
University of Adelaide 83
Dissipative Mufflers
University of Adelaide 84
Dissipative Mufflers (Lined ducts)
B C
A =perforated sheet steel or Al D
B = spacer (wire mesh) A
E
C = plastic covering
(approx 20 μm thick)
D = rockwool or fibreglass
duct
E = duct wall inner
wall
• Extent of protection needed
depends on air flow speed.
• Regularly spaced holes in
perforated sheet can whistle
at high flow speeds.
ENC5 p.485
University of Adelaide 85
Duct Liner Design
𝜎′ = mass/unit area of plastic membrane.
University of Adelaide 86
Design Curves
• Assume two opposite sides lined.
• For four sides lined, add results for each of the two pairs
of opposite sides.
• For circular ducts, double the result for the rectangular
duct with two sides lined, using the rectangular duct
height equal to circular duct diameter.
University of Adelaide 87
Liner Design Curves
3.5
3.0
2.5
curve
no
L
h
R1L
rc = 1 2h
R1L
rc = 2 Predicted OCTAVE
2.0
1
2
3
0.25
0.5
L L
band attenuation
1
1.5
1.0
4
5
2
4 rates.
3 2 1
Attenuation rate (dB per h duct length)
3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5
3.0
R1L
rc = 4
R1L
rc = 8
Bulk reacting liner;
2.5
2.0 σ/ρh = 0. M = 0
1.5
1.0
5 4 3 2 1
See text for
5 4 3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5
3.0 R1L R1L additional curves
rc = 12 rc = 16
2.5
2.0
1.5
5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2
1.0
1 1
0.5
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 .01 0.1 1 10 ENC5 p. 487
2h/l
University of Adelaide 88
89
3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5
3.0 R 1R R 1R
c =4 c =8
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
5 4 3 2 1 5
0.5 4 3 2 1
0.0
3.5
3.0 R 1R R 1R
c = 12 c = 16
2.5
University of Adelaide
2.0
1.5
5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2
1.0
1 1
0.5
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 .01 0.1 1 10
2 h /
Lined Duct Design Procedure
• Assumes only plane waves propagate:
0.5𝑐 𝑓 = cut‐on frequency (Hz)
𝑓 𝑓 ; 𝑓 𝑑 = diameter of duct (m)
𝑑 𝑐 = speed of sound (m/s)
University of Adelaide 90
Lined Duct Design Procedure
• Flow effects
- Sound and flow in opposite directions increases attenuation and
vice versa
University of Adelaide 91
Duct Cut On Frequencies
• Higher order mode propagation
Rectangular section ducts Circular section ducts,
c c
f co f co 0.586 ENC5 p. 494
2Ly d
c n y
2
nz
2
c m ,n
f ny ,nz
L
f m,n ENC5 p. 495
2 Ly z 2a
University of Adelaide 93
Duct Cut On Frequencies
University of Adelaide 94
Above Cut-On Frequency
• Above cut-on frequency, cross modes can exist in the
duct.
• If there is a side-branch absorber installed, acoustic
waves can by-pass the absorber (i.e. silencer useless).
University of Adelaide 95
Cross Sectional Discontinuity
• Usually the absorptive material is placed recessed in the
duct, so that the air-flow is smooth, which results in a
sudden expansion in the cross-sectional area.
Sound absorbing material
H1 H2 Main duct
University of Adelaide 96
Cross Sectional Discontinuity
30
Expansion ratio m = 9
The transmission loss (TL)
25
6
of a lined expansion
chamber as a function of the
Transmission loss (dB)
4
3
20 2 area expansion ratio m and
1
the total attenuation of the
m =
15 lining. The solid curves
9
show TL for kle = 0, , ... .n
10 6
and the dashed curves show
4
TL for kle = /2, 3/2,...,
3
5
2 (2n+1)/2.
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Total attentuation of lining (dB)
ENC5 p.498
University of Adelaide 97
Unwanted Flow Noise at Bends ENC5 p.509
University of Adelaide 98
Duct Bends or Elbows
Correction for attenuation at a duct bend with no turning vanes: A, rectangular lined
duct and axial plane wave input; B, rectangular lined duct and diffuse input; C,
rectangular unlined duct and axial plane wave input; D, rectangular unlined duct
and diffuse input; E, circular unlined duct 0.2 m in diameter and diffuse input; F,
circular unlined duct 1.5 m in diameter and diffuse input. S is the duct cross-
sectional area, and is the sound wavelength. The circular duct curves are based on
data from ASHRAE-1984 Systems.
ENC p. 496
University of Adelaide 99
Unlined Ducts
ENC p. 497
For 𝑓 𝑓
TL TL 3
University of Adelaide 107
Lined Plenum Attenuator ENC5 p. 515
In q
H
h
L
(a) (b)
L L
University of Adelaide 112
Cross Sectional Discontinuity
• Usually the absorptive material is placed recessed in the
duct, so that the air-flow is smooth, which results in a
sudden expansion in the cross-sectional area.
Sound absorbing material
H1 H2 Main duct
Expansion ratio m = 9
The transmission loss (TL)
25
6
of a lined expansion
chamber as a function of the
Transmission loss (dB)
4
3
20 2 area expansion ratio m and
1
the total attenuation of the
m =
15 lining. The solid curves
9
show TL for kle = 0, , ... .n
10 6
and the dashed curves show
4
TL for kle = /2, 3/2,...,
3
5
2 (2n+1)/2.
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Total attentuation of lining (dB)
3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5
3.0
R1L
rc = 4
R1L
rc = 8 Calculate 2ℎ/𝜆 to
2.5
2.0 determine x-axis
1.5
1.0
5
coordinate
4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5
R1L R1L
3.0
2.5
rc = 12 rc = 16 Calculate L/h to
2.0
determine which
1.5
curve 1-5.
5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2
1.0
1 1
0.5
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 .01 0.1 1 10
2h/l
University of Adelaide 117
Design Curves
• Assume two opposite sides lined.
3 2 1
0.5
0.0
3.5 2 0.1 100⁄343
R1L R1L
3.0
2.5
rc = 4 rc = 8 0.058
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
Which curve on all the
0.0
3.5
graphs has the highest
3.0 R1L
rc = 12
R1L
rc = 16 attention dB /m?
2.5
2.0
1.5
4, Curve 5.
5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2
1.0
1 1
0.5
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 .01 0.1 1 10
2h/l
University of Adelaide 119
Liner Design Curves ENC p. 483
3.5
3.0 curve
no
L
h
R1L
rc = 1 2h
R1L
rc = 2 4, Curve 5.
2.5
1 0.25 3.5
2.0 2 0.5 curve L
3 1 L L 3.0
1.5 no h
4 2 2.5
1.0 5 4 1 0.25
3 2 1 2.0 2 0.5
Attenuation rate (dB per h duct length)
3 2 1
0.5 3 1
1.5 4 2
0.0 5 4
3.5 1.0
3
)
R1L R1L
3.0
rc = 4 rc = 8
2.5 Curve 5 means 𝐿⁄ℎ 4
2.0
1.5 Which means the duct is
1.0
5 4 3 2 1 5
going to be really BIG.
4 3 2 1
0.5
0.0
Is there enough space?
3.5
3.0 R1L
rc = 12
R1L
rc = 16
This is the age-old problem
2.5 of attenuating low-frequency
2.0
1.5
noise: need really thick
1.0
5 4 3 2
1
5 4 3 2 sound absorptive material.
1
0.5
0.0
0.01 0.1 1 10 .01 0.1 1 10
2h/l
University of Adelaide 120
Attenuating Low Frequency Noise
• For jet engines, you
want to minimise the
frontal area because
you want to minimise
the form drag.
http://hpac.com/site‐files/hpac.com/files/archive/hpac.com/fastrack/Terzigni_Fig_2.gif
H1 H2 Main duct
Expansion ratio m = 9
The transmission loss (TL)
25
6
of a lined expansion
chamber as a function of the
Transmission loss (dB)
4
3
20 2 area expansion ratio m and
1
the total attenuation of the
m =
15 lining. The solid curves
9
show TL for kle = 0, , ... .n
10 6
and the dashed curves show
4
TL for kle = /2, 3/2,...,
3
5
2 (2n+1)/2.
0
Where le is the length of the
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Total attentuation of lining (dB)
expansion.
ENC5 p. 498
4
3 where S1 /S2 is the ratio of
20 2
1
total duct cross-sectional
m =
area to open duct cross-
15
9
sectional area.
Say le = 1.0m for starters.
6
10
Calculate
4
3
𝑘𝑙 1 1.83
5
2 to see if need to use solid or
0
dashed curves – does not
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Total attentuation of lining (dB)
matter in this case, see over.
ENC5 p. 498
University of Adelaide 127
Cross Sectional Discontinuity
30
𝑆 2ℎ 2𝐿 1
Expansion ratio m = 9
𝑚
25
6
𝑆 2ℎ 1
Transmission loss (dB)
4
3 We are using Curve 5,
20 2
1
which means 𝐿⁄ℎ 4, or
m =
𝐿 4ℎ, where ℎ 0.1m
15
9 𝑆 2ℎ 2 4ℎ
𝑚
10 6 𝑆 2ℎ
4 𝑆 10ℎ
3 𝑚 5
5
2
𝑆 2ℎ
Want 15dB of TL -- hence
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Total attentuation of lining (dB) need 10 dB of liner atten.
ENC5 p. 498
University of Adelaide 128
Summary
• Need 10 dB of liner attenuation.
• Summary:
1.0m long, 1.0m high, 1.0m deep,
thickness of absorptive material on each face 0.4m
open cross-sectional area 0.2m x 1.0m
• Good!
• Had 10 dB from
theory estimate
• Click Close
when finished
30
40
0.2 1.0 10 100
ka
ENC 4 p.508 Fig 9.30; ENC5 p520 Fig 8.46
University of Adelaide 140
Exhaust Stack Directivity
20
10
-10
-40
20
-10
10
-10
-20
90 degrees 120 degrees
-30
-40
0.2 1.0 10 100 0.2 1.0 10 100
ka ka
Scatter in the directivity Index data measured in the field and reported by Day
(2008).
ENC5 p.525 Fig 8.50
University of Adelaide 141
Exhaust Stack Directivity
Sound power level, Lw, radiated by duct outlet: ENC5 p. 524
400
𝐿 𝐿 𝐷𝐼 10log 4𝜋𝑟 10log 𝐴
𝜌𝑐
Directivity index, DIθ , may be obtained from Figures
Excess attenuation, AE , may be calculated as in Ch. 5.
Noise reduction due to exhaust stack addition:
NR IL 𝐴 𝐴 20 log 𝑟 ⁄𝑟 𝐷𝐼 𝐷𝐼
subscript, s, refers to quantities with the stack in place.
Sound pressure level, Lps , at location rs with the stack in place is given
by:
400
𝐿 𝐿 IL DI 10log 4𝜋𝑟 10log 𝐴
𝜌𝑐
where DIs is the directivity of the exhaust stack in the direction of the
receiver obtained from the directivity figures.