1. "Is India's caste system still relevant in the 21st century?

"
For:
• The caste system continues to perpetuate discrimination and inequality in India.
• It hampers social mobility and limits opportunities for individuals from lower castes.
• Despite legal measures, caste-based violence and discrimination persist.
• Abolishing the caste system can promote true equality and unity among Indians.
Against:
• The caste system has evolved over time and now includes affirmative action for lower
castes.
• It serves as a social structure that provides identity and community for many.
• Some argue that caste-based reservations in education and employment have resulted in
reverse discrimination.
• Abolishing it could lead to cultural and identity crises among some communities.

2. "Should India prioritize economic development over environmental

conservation?"
For:
• Economic development can lift millions out of poverty and provide a better quality of
life.
• Investments in infrastructure, industry, and technology are essential for progress.
• Balancing economic growth and environmental conservation is possible through
sustainable practices.
• A stronger economy can fund environmental initiatives.
Against:
• Rapid industrialization and unchecked development harm ecosystems and public health.
• Climate change poses a severe threat, and environmental degradation affects the poorest
communities the most.
• A focus on growth without environmental safeguards could lead to irreversible damage.
• India can pursue green initiatives that create jobs and ensure long-term prosperity.
 3. "Is social media more harmful than beneficial for society?"
For:
• Social media can perpetuate misinformation and polarize society.
• It often contributes to cyberbullying, mental health issues, and addiction.
• Privacy breaches and data exploitation are widespread concerns.
• Excessive screen time can harm physical and mental well-being.
Against:
• Social media connects people globally, fostering communication and awareness.
• It empowers individuals to share their voices and mobilize for social causes.
• Businesses and entrepreneurs use it as a vital tool for marketing and growth.
• Responsible use can mitigate many of the negative effects.

4. "Should governments regulate the use of facial recognition technology?"

For:
• Facial recognition poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties.
• It can be used for mass surveillance and tracking of individuals without consent.
• The technology is prone to bias, leading to discrimination, especially against minorities.
• Government regulations can ensure responsible and ethical use.
Against:
• Facial recognition can enhance security measures, helping in crime prevention and
identification.
• Regulating it too strictly may hinder law enforcement's ability to protect citizens.
• Properly implemented, facial recognition can expedite processes like airport security and
criminal investigations.
• Balancing regulation with legitimate security concerns is essential.
 5. "Is automation and AI a threat to traditional employment?"
For:
• Automation and AI can lead to job displacement, especially in routine and repetitive
industries.
• The shift towards automation may exacerbate income inequality.
• Retraining and reskilling workers may not be feasible for everyone affected.
• A thoughtful approach to automation is essential to address these challenges.
Against:
• Automation and AI can create new job opportunities in emerging industries.
• They can enhance worker productivity and reduce dangerous or monotonous tasks.
• Historical technological advancements have not led to widespread unemployment.
• Governments and businesses can invest in education and training to adapt to the changing
job landscape.

6. "Is the future of energy production solely dependent on renewable sources?"

For:
• Fossil fuels are finite and contribute significantly to climate change.
• Renewable energy sources, like solar and wind, are sustainable and eco-friendly.
• Transitioning to renewables reduces dependence on unstable global energy markets.
• Clean energy can create jobs and boost the economy.
Against:
• Renewable energy sources alone may not meet the growing global energy demand.
• Energy storage and distribution issues need to be addressed for renewables to be fully
viable.
• Fossil fuels remain essential for certain industries and are more reliable in some regions.
• A diverse energy mix, including nuclear and clean fossil fuels, is necessary for stability.

7. "Should there be a universal basic income for all citizens?"

For:
 • Universal basic income can alleviate poverty and reduce income inequality.
• It provides a safety net in times of economic uncertainty and job displacement.
• UBI can simplify welfare systems and reduce administrative costs.
• It enables individuals to pursue entrepreneurial or creative endeavors without financial
risk.
Against:
• Funding a universal basic income program can be prohibitively expensive.
• There is a concern that UBI might discourage people from working or pursuing higher
education.
• It may not address the root causes of poverty and inequality effectively.
• Implementing UBI requires careful consideration of its economic impact.

8. "Is universal healthcare a fundamental human right?"

For:
• Access to healthcare is essential for the well-being and dignity of every individual.
• Universal healthcare can lead to better health outcomes and reduced mortality rates.
• It promotes social equality by ensuring everyone has access to medical services.
• Universal healthcare systems in other countries have proven successful.
Against:
• Universal healthcare can strain government budgets and lead to increased taxes.
• It may result in longer wait times for medical procedures and reduced choice for patients.
• Some argue that healthcare should be a personal responsibility rather than a right.
• Achieving universal healthcare requires a complex overhaul of existing systems.

9. "Should governments have access to citizens' private data for security

purposes?"
For:
• Access to private data can help prevent and investigate crimes and terrorism.
• National security often relies on the ability to gather intelligence from various sources.
 • Proper safeguards and oversight can protect against abuse.
• In some cases, sacrificing a degree of privacy may be necessary for collective security.
Against:
• Privacy is a fundamental right, and unwarranted government access can lead to abuses of
power.
• Mass surveillance can create a chilling effect on free speech and expression.
• Trust in government is eroded when citizens feel their privacy is violated.
• Alternate methods of security, such as targeted surveillance, can be more effective
without sacrificing privacy.

10."Is nuclear energy a safe and sustainable solution for our energy needs?"
For:
• Nuclear energy produces low greenhouse gas emissions and can help combat climate
change.
• Modern nuclear reactor designs are safer and more efficient.
• It provides a reliable source of baseload power, unlike some renewables.
• Nuclear energy can reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
Against:
• Nuclear accidents, like Chernobyl and Fukushima, highlight the catastrophic risks.
• The long-term storage and disposal of nuclear waste remain unresolved issues.
• Nuclear proliferation and the risk of nuclear weapons development are concerns.
• Investing in renewables and energy efficiency may be a safer and more sustainable path.

11."Should the death penalty be abolished worldwide?"

For:
• The death penalty violates the right to life and is irreversible in cases of wrongful
conviction.
• Its application is often racially biased and discriminatory.
• Many countries have abolished it, indicating a global trend towards its rejection.
 • Rehabilitation and life imprisonment offer a more humane approach to justice.
Against:
• The death penalty serves as a deterrent against heinous crimes.
• It provides closure and justice for victims' families.
• In some cases, life imprisonment can lead to the release of dangerous criminals.
• The choice to retain or abolish the death penalty should be a sovereign decision.

12."Is cryptocurrency a viable alternative to traditional currencies?"

For:
• Cryptocurrency offers financial inclusion to those without access to traditional banking.
• It can reduce the fees and delays associated with cross-border transactions.
• Blockchain technology has various applications beyond cryptocurrencies.
• Cryptocurrencies may provide a hedge against inflation.
Against:
• Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and can be speculative.
• They lack regulation and consumer protection, leading to scams and fraud.
• Illicit activities, such as money laundering and tax evasion, are associated with
cryptocurrencies.
• Traditional currencies are stable and backed by governments, providing security.

13."Should genetic engineering be used to create designer babies?"

For:
• Genetic engineering can eliminate genetic diseases and disorders.
• It allows parents to have healthier children and avoid hereditary health issues.
• It can enhance human traits and intelligence, potentially improving the overall gene pool.
• It empowers parents with more control over the genetic characteristics of their offspring.
Against:
 • Genetic engineering for designer babies raises ethical concerns about playing "God."
• It could exacerbate social inequalities, as only the wealthy might access such technology.
• There is potential for unintended consequences and unforeseen genetic issues.
• It may undermine the value of human diversity and individuality.

14."Is climate change primarily caused by human activities?"

For:
• The overwhelming consensus among scientists is that human activities, such as burning
fossil fuels and deforestation, are the primary drivers of climate change.
• The increase in greenhouse gases, like carbon dioxide, correlates with rising global
temperatures.
• Human-induced climate change has severe consequences for the environment, including
more frequent and intense weather events.
• Mitigating human-induced factors is essential to combat climate change effectively.
Against:
• Climate change is a natural process, and the Earth's climate has fluctuated throughout
history.
• Human activities contribute only a small fraction of greenhouse gases compared to
natural sources.
• Climate models are imperfect and subject to uncertainties.
• Economic and technological development is essential for addressing climate change, and
total cessation of human activities is unrealistic.

15."Should the voting age be lowered to 16?"

For:
• Sixteen-year-olds are impacted by government decisions and should have a say in their
future.
• Lowering the voting age can promote civic engagement and political awareness from an
early age.
• Many 16-year-olds work, pay taxes, and can be directly affected by policies related to
education and employment.
 • Several countries have successfully lowered the voting age without adverse
consequences.
Against:
• Sixteen-year-olds may lack the life experience and maturity necessary to make informed
political decisions.
• Voting is a significant responsibility, and individuals should be of a certain age to
exercise this right.
• Lowering the voting age might lead to increased political manipulation and pressure on
younger voters.
• The current age of 18 is a reasonable threshold for voting eligibility.

16."Is capitalism the best economic system for fostering innovation?"

For:
• Capitalism rewards innovation with financial incentives and competition.
• The profit motive drives entrepreneurs and businesses to create new products and
services.
• Capitalist economies have a history of technological advancements and prosperity.
• Competition in the market encourages continuous improvement and innovation.
Against:
• Capitalism can prioritize profit over social and environmental concerns.
• It can lead to income inequality and concentrate wealth in the hands of a few.
• Innovation is often driven by short-term gains, which may neglect long-term
sustainability.
• Alternative economic models, like socialism, can also foster innovation while addressing
inequality.

17."Should hate speech be protected as free speech?"

For:
• Protecting hate speech under free speech principles preserves individual liberties.
 • Defining hate speech is subjective and may lead to censorship and suppression of dissent.
• Allowing hate speech in the open allows society to confront and challenge such ideas
openly.
• Limiting hate speech could set a dangerous precedent for restricting other forms of
speech.
Against:
• Hate speech can incite violence, discrimination, and harm to marginalized communities.
• It creates a hostile and unsafe environment for those targeted by hate speech.
• Many democratic countries place reasonable limits on free speech to protect public safety
and well-being.
• Protecting hate speech can normalize and perpetuate harmful ideologies.

18."Is the education system failing to prepare students for the future?"
For:
• Traditional education often focuses on memorization rather than critical thinking and
problem-solving.
• Rapid technological advancements require adaptable skills that traditional education may
not provide.
• High-stakes testing can lead to a narrow focus on exam preparation rather than holistic
learning.
• The changing job landscape demands skills like creativity, emotional intelligence, and
digital literacy.
Against:
• The education system provides a foundational knowledge base and essential skills.
• It equips students with the ability to learn, adapt, and acquire new skills throughout their
lives.
• Some aspects of traditional education, such as discipline and structure, are valuable for
personal development.
• Education has evolved to incorporate technology and adapt to changing needs.

19."Should the government provide free internet access to all citizens?"

For:
• Access to the internet is increasingly crucial for education, employment, and civic
engagement.
• The digital divide disproportionately affects marginalized communities, exacerbating
inequality.
• Free internet access can stimulate economic growth, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
• It can enhance access to government services and information, promoting transparency.
Against:
• Providing free internet access may strain government budgets and resources.
• Market competition and innovation may be hindered if the government becomes the sole
provider.
• Free internet may not address the root causes of digital inequality, such as device
availability and digital literacy.
• Some argue that affordable access is a more sustainable solution than entirely free access.

20."Is privacy a luxury we can no longer afford in the digital age?"

For:
• The digital age has seen unprecedented intrusions into personal privacy.
• Privacy is essential for protecting individuals from surveillance, identity theft, and
cyberattacks.
• Loss of privacy can lead to chilling effects on free speech and self-censorship.
• Strict privacy regulations, like GDPR, have been implemented globally to safeguard
individuals.
Against:
• In the digital age, privacy expectations should adapt to the changing landscape.
• Transparency and data sharing can lead to improved services and personalization.
• Individuals often willingly share personal information in exchange for convenience.
• Balancing privacy and security concerns is a complex task, and some information sharing
is necessary for public safety.
 21."Should the world transition to a cashless society?"
For:
• A cashless society reduces the risk of theft and fraud associated with physical cash.
• It can enhance financial transparency, making it harder for illegal activities to go
unnoticed.
• Digital transactions are more efficient, reducing the cost and time of handling physical
currency.
• A cashless system can promote financial inclusion, as more people gain access to digital
banking.
Against:
• Going cashless may exclude individuals who lack access to digital technology or bank
accounts.
• It poses privacy concerns, as digital transactions can be tracked and monitored.
• Some argue that it could lead to a loss of financial autonomy and increased dependence
on banks and technology companies.
• Cybersecurity risks may increase as reliance on digital payments grows.

22."Is the use of drones in warfare ethical?"

For:
• Drones can reduce the risk to soldiers' lives in combat.
• They provide precision in targeting, potentially minimizing civilian casualties.
• Drone technology can be used for reconnaissance and surveillance, aiding in intelligence
gathering.
• Ethical use of drones includes adhering to international laws and norms.
Against:
• Drone strikes have led to civilian casualties and collateral damage.
• Remote operators may become desensitized to the consequences of their actions.
• There are concerns about the lack of accountability and transparency in drone warfare.
• Drones can infringe upon a nation's sovereignty if used without consent.
 23."Should the United Nations have more authority in global affairs?"
For:
• The United Nations plays a critical role in promoting peace, diplomacy, and international
cooperation.
• Global challenges, such as climate change and pandemics, require collaborative efforts
beyond national borders.
• Strengthening the UN's authority can prevent unilateral actions that lead to conflict.
• It can enhance humanitarian efforts and provide a platform for resolving disputes
peacefully.
Against:
• Granting more authority to the UN may infringe on national sovereignty and
independence.
• The UN's bureaucracy and inefficiency have been criticized, raising concerns about its
effectiveness.
• Power imbalances among member states can hinder fair decision-making within the UN.
• Some argue that strengthening regional organizations may be more effective than
centralizing global authority.

24."Is space exploration a worthwhile investment for humanity?"

For:
• Space exploration has led to numerous technological advancements with practical
applications on Earth.
• It inspires scientific curiosity and encourages STEM education.
• Space may hold solutions to challenges on Earth, such as sustainable resource mining.
• The quest for knowledge and exploration is intrinsic to human nature.
Against:
• The cost of space exploration is exorbitant and could be better spent on pressing global
issues.
• Many space missions have not yielded immediate benefits for humanity.
• Earth's problems, like poverty and climate change, should take precedence over space
exploration.
 • Space exploration can contribute to space debris and environmental concerns.

25. "Should affirmative action policies be implemented in education and

employment?"
For:
• Affirmative action policies aim to address historical and systemic discrimination.
• They can increase diversity and representation in education and the workforce.
• Affirmative action is a temporary measure to level the playing field for marginalized
groups.
• Diverse perspectives and backgrounds can lead to better decision-making and innovation.
Against:
• Affirmative action may discriminate against individuals who do not belong to
underrepresented groups.
• It can lead to reverse discrimination and create resentment among certain populations.
• Merit-based selection should be the primary criterion for education and employment
opportunities.
• Socioeconomic factors should be considered instead of race or ethnicity.

26."Is there a moral obligation to address income inequality?"

For:
• Income inequality is linked to social problems, including reduced access to education and
healthcare.
• It can lead to social unrest and instability, affecting everyone in society.
• Addressing income inequality aligns with principles of fairness and justice.
• A more equal society can result in better overall well-being and opportunity for all.
Against:
• Income inequality can be a natural outcome of individual effort and achievement.
• Efforts to reduce income inequality may disincentivize hard work and entrepreneurship.
• Market forces, not government intervention, should determine income distribution.
• Addressing income inequality should focus on lifting the poor out of poverty rather than
redistributing wealth.