Current status of Re; ‘Trader QUESTIONNAIRE gulated Markets of Odisha (through secondary data) Name of RMC y 2. | Name of Firm 3. | Name of the Person 4. | Contact No. 5. | Major commodities you deal in Pak 6. | District 2. General information on RMC Sr. No. | Commodity ‘Approximate ‘Months of arrival in mandiin | arrival MT Approximate %age traded in mandi of the total production Boro NT _[Novtoret £0,000 Bie. _| Pacloln. Fad ces e] a] oxy 3. Presence of Market Functionaries Particulars Nos, ‘Commission agent lo : Traders 0 Brokers Oo Transporters 10 Processors O 4. Fee & Charges (For top 3 crops) Particular Charged from Buyer | %orFixed | C1 or Seller (Farmer) in INR 2 [ey Page 1 of 10Mandi Entry fee Unloading Sorting/Grading Bagging Weighing Loading Buyer commission Seller commission ‘Mandi Fee dd pode) Page 2 of 10Observation: 5. Commodity flow in the RMC Crop Name Paty [oy ‘Auction timing AU tob Pm Auction System & Den i Open ii. One to one ill. e NAM iv Any Other Mandi Tax ‘Commission from farmer Commission from buyers ‘Mandi entry fees Payment Terms i.e. cash or credit & if credit then how many days. cw i oy € hes 4 Page 3 of 10Crop 1 S. | Month | Arrival Source [Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate No. Quantity | Place from % of total Market. distance (in MT) Mandi Production (in KM) ra Sn Yon dan fh © 2 Feb |lowon | ole 6 3, | March April May July ‘Aug a. 5. 6. [June 7. 8. 9. Sep 10. | Oct 11. [Nov [Tomojon [eto 0 12. [Dec [azo fon | Lo © Note = Please collect last five years monthly arrival data and average price data Crop-2 $. | Month | Arrival | Source | Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate No Quantity | Place | from % of total Market distance (in mT) Mandi_—_| production (in km) 13. | Jan 14. | Feb 15. | March 16. | April a7. | May 18. | June 19. [July Page 4 of 1020. | Aug 21. | Sep 22. | Oct 23. | Nov 24. | Dec Crop-3 3 Month —s eae Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate lace | from % of total Market distance (in mT) Mandi | produ (in kM) 25. [Jan 26. | Feb 27. | March 28. | April 23. | May 30. | June 31. | July 32. | Aug 33. | Sep 34, | Oct 35. | Nov 36. | Dec 6. Reason for lower arrival in mandi ( Plz Tick) Reason a Higher price realization outside mandi Unfair practices in mandi ‘Auction not conducted timely Poor assaying facilities Poor labour availability Poor road connectivity Page 5 of 10Pickup facilities by traders 7. Infrastructure Assessment S.No Particulars Actual Required Why itis needed a& 1. | Electricity availability Ay ee aE 2.__| Water availability 0 ‘gu NO 3. | Shed @.__ | Platform ts mus = apt | 6. Chambers ed 7,__ [Sorting & Grading faciities | Apoe 8, | Weighing Bridge of ee yor 9. | Canteen 10. _| Parking fa wot 11. | Bank ats 12. | Toilet U 13. | Testing Facilities a 14. | E-Nam facility ONO aged 15. | internet Facility ‘ed 16. | Staying facility for farmer Yped 17._| Dry Warehouse facility yh 18. | Cold Storage Facility No yal Weafobh. 19. | Truck availal aed Uv v 20. | Rail availability 4 “No No Page 6 of 10S.N i io Particulars Actual Required | Why itis needed a& wee for which Commodity 22. | Availability of labour pe Alo 23. | Other “pe Ne 24. | Other 25. | Others 26. | Othera 27. | Observations Lappe are Come’ from Chhaarogeds oa} Parapet tendeb hegre Comusing Grew 1 do D Raw ki'ffance . Cold storage availability? ee a) Ifcold storage not available, i eed for it? (yes/No) b) Ifyes, then for which commodity? c) What capacity of cold storage will suffice? 8. E-NAM Assessment Registration Status | No Yes 1 Ing, then reason? aéom facility not available in mandi 2) donot want to register 3) complex registration process Page 7 of 104) NAM mandi is far 5) less farmer participation ©) Delay in transaction settlements 8.2 if Yes Sr. Major Annual No. | Commodities | Volume cece poprontmate No. of Remark traded eecery z 2 3 8.3 How do you rate E-Nam facility for farmers and traders 8.3.1 Farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam facility for farmers 8.3.2 Trader perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the participation of traders through E-NAM a) Further need for improving assaying and testing facilities b) Need better packaging facilities ©) Timely auctions d) Better management needed from enam officials e) Unfair practices should be monitored f) Others (Please Specify) Page 8 of 108.4 Which other commodities should be traded in E-Nam Sr. | Major Commodities | Ar nnual Volume No. | traded ati we)N]e 8.5 What are your views for E-Nam implementation from farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam facility for farmers 8.6 Trader perspective on implementation of E-Nam 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the participation of traders through E-NAM 9) Mandi readiness of integration 10) Reason for non-integration Pase af 1011) E-Nam Meeting requirements yes - seenee‘Trader QUESTIONNAIRE Current status of Regulated Markets of Odisha Name of RMC {through secondary data) Tomogede c Name of Firm Cares Cocet k SHG . | Name of the Person Prspa Putoe! ond Sroet Klytd Fa sb FO 5. | Major commodities you deal in pat ! 6. | District = colepheerct ( 4. | Contact No. 2. General information on RMC Sr.No. | Commodity Approximate Months of Approximate %age arrival in mandi in | arrival traded in mandi of the MT total production 1 paddy 4000 T Novo Feb] 2 7 3 4 5 3. Presence of Market Functionaries Particulars Nos ‘Commission agent Traders gz Brokers ° Transporters eS Processors © 4, Fee & Charges (For top 3 crops) [ Particular Charged from Buyer | %orFixed | C1 C2 CG or Seller (Farmer) in INR Page 1of 10Mandi Entry fee Unloading Sorting/Grading Bagging Weighing Loading Seller commission Mandi FeeObservation: Top frase hat peru ue bea? dona ae oe Atel rot Coopemete wh rope! 5. Commodity flow in the RMC Crop Name padaay cr a Ss Auction timing 2 Am do’ & rr ‘Auction System i. Open Al One to one . iii, e NAM iv Any Other a ‘Mandi Tax ‘Commission from farmer ‘Commission from buyers Mandi entry fees Payment Terms i.e. cash or credit & if credit then how many days.Crop1 Month i pi onc Source | Distance Approximate | Destination Approximate ity | Place | from % of total Market distance {in wr) Mandi Production ; (in KM) 7 Jan : Frodo iuragel 2 Km BI L. Feb Yooton, qo | Ap 3 March 4. April 5. May 6._| june 7. | iuly 8. Aug Ey Sep 10. | Oct LL. | Ne [Yom gens| alo | A:ky 12. | Dec Soeton | do}. 3 tm. Note— Please collect last five years monthly arrival data and average price data Crop-2 | Month | Arrival | Source | Distance | Approximate ‘Approximate No Quantity | Place | from | % of total distance (in MT) Mandi _| production (in kw) 13. [Jan 14. | Feb 15. | March 16. | April 17. | May 18. | June 39. | July Page 4 of 1020. | Aug 21. | Sep 22. | Oct | 23. | Nov 24. | Dec Crop-3 a Month ae Source | Distance | Approximate ] Destination | Approximate antity | Place | from % of total Market distance (nT) Mandi | production (in km) 25. [Jan 26. | Feb 27. | March 28. | April 29. | May 30. | June 31. | July 32. | Aug 33. | Sep 3a, | Oct 35. | Nov 36, | Dec 6. Reason for lower arrival in mandi ( Plz Tick) Gi a a Reason Higher price realization outside mandi Unfair practices in mandi ‘Auction not conducted timely Poor assaying facilities Poor labour availability Poor road connectivity Page 5 of 10Pickup facilities by traders see avaticenes Other Observations Prag Ach nod gone The claty trading Segond oy 7. Infrastructure Assessment S.No Particulars ‘Actual Required | Whyitisneeded a& for which Commodity 1. | Electricity availability no re) 2. | Water availability io nas 3. | Shed Ne yd 4. | Platform a res 3. | Shops 7} me 6. _ | Ripening Chambers 7. _ | Sorting & Grading facilities | jo re 8. | Weighing Bridge 9. | Canteen xe 10. | Parking facilities Ne ai. _| Bank Ne 12. | Toilet No 13._| Testing Facilities Wo Op 14. | E-Nam facility Ne yo 15. _| Internet Facility ys 16. _| Staying facility for farmer NO ps 17._| Dry Warehouse facility WO YS 18. | Cold Storage Facility NO 5 19. | Truck availability NO 20. _| Rail availability (NS Page 6 of 10S.No Particulars ‘Actual Required | Whyitis needed a& ba hawkoue for which Commodity 22.” | Availability oF labour 23. | Other 24. | Othera 25. | Others 26.__| Othera 27. | Observations Cold storage availability? a) If cold storage not available, is there a need f tol b) Ifyes, then for which commodity? ©) What capacity of cold storage will suffice? 8. E-NAM Assessment Registration Status [ No 8.1 If no, then reason? 1) eNAM facility not available in mandi 2) donot want to register 3) complex registration process Page 7 of 104) eNAM mandiis far 5) less farmer participation 6) Delay in transaction settlements 8.2 if Yes St. | Major | Annual_[% of totalmandi | Approximate No. oF Remark No. | Commodities | Volume | arrivals beneficiary traded 1 2 3 8.3 How do you rate E-Nam facility for farmers and traders 8.3.1 Farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware ‘Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam facility for farmers 8.3.2 Trader perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware ‘Any suggestion for increasing the participation of traders through E-NAM a) Further need for improving assaying and testing facilities b) Need better packaging facilities ©) Timely auctions d) Better management needed from enam officials, ) Unfair practices should be monitored f} Others (Please Specify) Page 8 of 108.4 Which other commodities should be trade E-Nam St. | Major Commodities | Annual Volume Remark No. | traded 1 2 3 8.5 What are your views for E-Nam implementation from farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam facllity for farmers 8.6 Trader perspective on implementation of E-Nam Any suggestion for incre: 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware the participation of traders through E-NAM 9) Mandi readiness of integration 10) Reason for non-integration Page 9 of 1011) E-Nam Meeting requirements teeeen Page 10 of 10J._ Current status of Regulated Markets of Odi 1, | Name of RMC ‘Trader QUESTIONNAIRE isha (through secondary data) 2. | Name of Firm 3. | Name of the Person 4. | Contact No. BMIANCOSH 5. | Major commodities you de: Prrdy 6. | District Kololnwnatt 2. General information on RMC Particular Charged from Buyer or Seller (Farmer) in INR Sr.No. | Commodity ‘Approximate Months of | Approximate %age arrival in mandi in | arrival traded in mandi of the Mr total production 7 Paddy Yor toy [Nevde Rb] 1? 7 2 ‘ T 3 a 5 3. Presence of Market Functionaries Particulars Nos ‘Commission agent 3 Traders b Brokers ° Transporters 6 Processors ° 4, Fee & Charges (For top 3 crops) — ‘Gorfixed [C1 2 ro) Page Lof 10Mandi Entry fee NO Unloading No Sorting/Grading Ac Bagging Ne Weighing NO Loading Ag Buyer commission WY, Seller commission NO Mandi Fee a qe KO Page 2 of 10Observation: 5. Commodity flow in the RMC if credit then how many days. Crop Name Paty a 2S Auction timing Z_ Am 4o © >" ‘Auction System 1 Open open Ti. One to one iil. eNAM iv Any Other ‘Mandi Tax |e Commission from farmer he ‘Commission from buyers nO Mandi entry fees ne | Payment Terms Le. cash orcredit& [Jy Feonspar| Page 3 of 10Crop 1 S. [Month [Arrival [Source [Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate No Quantity | Place | from % of total Market distance {in MT) Mandi —_| production (in ky 1 [Jan vel 2ovoten ee 3k 2 [Feb i “(Boo alo ae 3. | March a._[Aprit 5. | May 6. [June 7. [auly &. | Aug 9. | Sep 10. | Oct 1 [Nv [gonten | do_| clo 2 [Pec [lowten | ap | ds Note = Please collect last five years monthly arrival data and average price data Crop-2 S| Month | Arrival | Source | Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate No Quantity | Place | from | %oftotal —_| Market distance (in wr) Mandi | production (in kr) 33. [tan 14. | Feb 15. | March 76. | April a7. | May 38. | June 19. | July Page 4 of 1020. [Aug 21. [Sep 22. | Oct | 23. | Nov 24. | Dec Crop-3 S. [Month [Arrival | Source | Distance | Approximate | Destination | Approximate No Quantity | Place | from | %oftotal —_| Market distance (in wr) Mandi | production (ink) 25. [Jan 26. | Feb 27. | March 28. | April 29. | May 30. | June lr 31, [suly 32. | Aug 33, | Sep 34. | Oct 35. | Nov 36, | Dec 6. Reason for lower arrival in mandi ( Plz Tick) [Reason ca a a Higher price realization outside mandi Unfair practices in mandi ‘Auction not conducted timely Poor assaying facilities Poor labour availability Poor road connectivity Page 5 of 10Pickup facilities by traders | Other Observations cet gene et 7. Infrastructure Assessment S.No Particulars Actual Required Why itis needed a& for which Commodity 1. | Electricity availability ee 2. | Water availa = 3. | Shed AG T Rey) 4. | Platform 5. | Shops 4 1 Repend 6. _ | Ripening Chambers 7. _ | Sorting & Grading facilities | No & | Weighing Bridge 9. | Canteen NO : 10. | Parking facilities ys 11. | Bank yes 12. | Toilet yes 13. _| Testing Facilities yes 14. | E-Nam facility Nb 2) 15. | Internet Facility ys 16. _| Staying facility for farmer Med 17. _| Dry Warehouse facility yet 18. | Cold Storage Facility Ne 19,__| Truck availability ‘Ne 20. | Rail availability ye Page 6 of 10S.No Particulars Actual Required Why itis needed a& for which Commodity 21.” | Law & Order yu 22. | Availability of labour 23. | Other 24. | Other2 25. | Other3 26. | Other4 27. | Observations Cold storage availability? a) If.cold storage not available, is there a need for it? (ves/No) \~ b) Ifyes, then for which commodity? c) What capacity of cold storage will suffice? 8. E-NAM Assessment Registration Status [No ~~ Yes 8.1 Ifno, then reason? 2) eNAM facility not available in mandi 2) do not want to register 3) complex registration process Page 7 of 104) eNAM mandiis far 5) ‘less farmer participation 6) Delay in transaction settlements 8.2 if Yes ‘Sr. | Major Annual | % of total mandi | Approximate No. of | Remark No. | Comms Volume | arrivals beneficiary traded 1 2 3 8.3 How do you rate E-Nam facility for farmers and traders 8.3.1 Farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam facility for farmers 8.3.2 Trader perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware ‘Any suggestion for increasing the participation of traders through E-NAM a) Further need for improving assaying and testing faci b) Need better packaging facilities c) Timely auctions d) Better management needed from enam officials e) Unfair practices should be monitored f)_ Others (Please Specify) Page 8 of 108.4 Which other commodities should be traded in E-Nam St. | Major Commodities | Annual Volume Remark No. | traded 1 2 3 8.5 What are your views for E-Nam implementation from farmers perspective 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the E-Nam fa lity for farmers 8.6 Trader perspective on implementation of E-Nam 1)Helpful 2) Not Helpful 3) Not Aware Any suggestion for increasing the participation of traders through E-NAM 9) Mandi readiness of integration 10) Reason for non-integration Page 9 of 1011) E-Nam Meeting requirements Page 10 of 10iteslagal Bone SUNAGARH PAGS Lt 201748 2nte-19 a0 | eo m2 No | Quantity! No | Quentity Quanity | No | Quantty No Cotnbty | | : [Be T : 726} 6116897} 1314) 100187,7 wes 7 BHR | 0388 |