CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Pressure ulcers are a skin malady which is brought about by precisely prompted ischemia.

Pressure ulcers are related with torment, diminished self-rule, social separation, and decreased

personal satisfaction, prompting huge expenses for the medicinal services framework.

In Germany in 2005 12.5% of all patients inside facilities and 6.6% in nursing homes have been

influenced by pressure ulcers. Concentrates in the Netherlands in 2005 even indicated 16.9% in

facility, 25.5% for nursing homes, and 12.6% for home consideration patients [1]. An ongoing

audit of pressure ulcer commonness and frequency crosswise over Scandinavia, Iceland, and

Ireland indicated pervasiveness paces of 8.9 to 25%. Mean occurrence fluctuated in the middle of

1.8 and 20%[2].The absolute riskof a unique individual to build up a pressure ulcer can be

evaluated by various scales (e.g., Braden scale), which depend on a few hazard factors, for

example, low movement, diminished versatility, temperature and skin dampness (e.g., because of

incontinence), sustenance and drinking conduct, and extra infections, for example, diabetes

mellitus and decreased circulatory strain [3]. Lack of healthy sustenance and drained slender

pressure are an indicator of unfavorable occasions among the older and those in danger for

pressure ulcers [4]. More insights about pressure ulcer anticipation and treatment can be found in

late rules [5].

Appropriately, the American pressure ulcer rule suggests twelve preventive exercises: execution

of measures to diminish pressure ulcer chance; no high angles of the leader of the bed

(counteractive action of shear-powers); customary repositioning; exceptional consideration if

there should arise an occurrence of sitting situating; mend insurance by complete offload; bolster
surfaces, pressure circulating gadgets and surfaces for high-chance people and in working rooms;

no utilization of froth rings, froth patterns, or doughnut type gadgets; skin protectant for people

with visit fecal incontinence or twofold urinary and fecal incontinence; adequate nourishment

and liquid admission and patient instruction [6].

Cutting edge Pressure Ulcer Risk Monitoring. There are various kinds of uncommon dynamic or

detached pressure ulcer sleeping cushions. Detached sleeping pads are made of materials (froth,

gel, air-filled, and so on.) which adjust to the geometry of their heap and accordingly appropriate

the pressure to a bigger surface.

Dynamic sleeping cushions typically contain different air chamberswhose pressure is naturally

changed after some time. Albeit such sleeping cushions are generally utilized and fundamentally

decrease the pressure ulcer hazard, they have three significant burdens: (a) they have significant

expenses and (b) clamor during expansion and emptying which can be irritating and upsetting [7]

and (c) they effectsly affect persistent portability and autonomy [7].

In this manner, they are typically utilized for patients at very hig chance, while there is an

absence of minimal effort anticipation frameworks for patients with medium hazard. Different

methodologies for pressure ulcer avoidance center around discovery of long haul strain to

specific skin areas.

The most clear kind of finder is a pressure sensor, since pressure is a definitive purpose behind

pressure ulcers. There are a few gatherings around the world, who are presently investigating the

utilization of pressure sensor tangles that can distinguish long haul strain to specific skin districts

[8]. Smith and Cooper [9] proposed a framework comprising of different sensors, for example,

cameras, pressure sensors, and accelerometers. Sensors depicted in this patent could be pressure

touchy mats, optical sensors, pressure detecting cushions underneath every leg of the bed, and
vertical accelerometers mounted to the bed's springs. Murakami et al. created novel capacitive

power sensors for estimation of skin interface power [10]. Zimlichman et al. utilized

piezoelectric sensorsmounted underneath the sleeping pad to identify bed developments and

exercises [11]. Chenu et al. depicted a material sensor thatmounted on a wheelchair, comprising

of three layers and dependent on the piezoresistive impact [12].

Every single such framework have a few hindrances. One is their significant expenses. Another

vital point is the area of the sensor framework in the bed, which can be underneath or over the

sleeping pad. Despite the fact that sensors underneath the bedding are less prominent, they are

reasonable preferably to the area of the bed's slatted edge over to the checked individual. On the

otherhand, area of the sensormat over the sleeping cushion prompts diminished air course,

helplessness as far as liquids, and decreased solace. Along these lines, pressure based sensor

mats are right now utilized for different applications like individual adaption of wheel seats [13],

however up to now, aside from research facility settings, their application for pressure ulcer

avoidance is constrained up until now.

There are different methodologies, observing the quantity of developments of the patient while

lying in bed rather than pressure on discrete skin regions.This number intently connects with

long haul pressure exposure.Motion screens are utilized for rest organize following and can be

helpful for pressure ulcer hazard estimation too [14]. Sensors can be optical sensors,

accelerometers, acoustic sensors, etc. For the most part, sensors are mounted on the bed (e.g.,

[15, 16]) or the patient himself [17]. Alqassim et al. [18] depict the utilization of a cell phone's

accelerometer for rest checking. Hoque et al. [19] appended remote 3D accelerometers to a

bedding so as to screen dozing conduct. Be that as it may, existing Affected methodologies just

have sensors underneath the sleeping pad (e.g., [20]), since sensors situated right underneath the
patient can decrease solace and breathability. Taking everything into account, none of the current

items for pressure ulcer hazard avoidance satisfies the accompanying essential prerequisites:

(I) adequate unwavering quality,

(ii) unpretentiousness,

(iii) long haul use,

(iv) low expenses,

(v) simple mounting at different sorts of beds.

Also, practicality of such a sensor framework must be approved by testing it for long occasions,

at the patient's home, tending to individuals of the objective gathering (older or debilitated

individuals with need of care). By and by, no longterm examinations of utilization of such a

framework in a home consideration situation are accessible up until this point.

It was the point of the present investigation to build up a pressure ulcer chance evaluation

framework dependent on accelerometer and pressure information which can satisfy the

necessities recorded previously. Since the pace of repositioning while at the same time lying in

bed is firmly identified with the pressure on single skin areas [14] and since repositioning

sensors are far simpler to actualize in an appropriate manner for consistent consideration, we

chose not to recognize the immediate reason for pressure ulcers, that is, long haul strain to single

skin locales, yet just one single purpose behind this immediate reason, specifically, the quantity

of repositionings during lying in bed. The framework's practicality ought to be assessed in a

longterm test at the homes of individuals of the objective gathering.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

As a patient becomes confined to bed for an all-encompassing term of time, huge and consistent

strain to the heel can cause narrow impediment, inevitably prompting the improvement of tissue
ischemia and a PU. The heel is at a higher danger of impediment because of the slight insurance

layers between the skin surface and calcaneus noticeable quality and diminished resting blood

perfusion levels [1]. Also the calcaneus has a little surface zone with a largepressure bearing hard

noticeable quality, which brings about higher than typical pressure. VanGilder, Amlung,

Harrison, and Meyer [2] examined 450,000 patients and discovered heel ulcers represented 41%

all things considered. Pressure ulceration in medicinal offices are named never occasions and the

frequency of a PU is regularly utilized as a marker for nature of care. Actually, the US

government refers to the advancement of PUs a "genuine nature of-care issue in all settings" [3].

The hugeness of patients obtaining PUs while hospitalized is multi-dimensional. Patients who

create PUs experience a one of a kind arrangement of results that remembers an expanded length

of remain for the emergency clinic, diminished personal satisfaction, expanded grimness and

death rates, and expanded medical clinic costs. The motivation behind this examination was to

explore the adequacy of six off-stacking strategies normally utilized in clinical settings to

diminish heel contact pressure and subsequently the arrangement of heel PUs.

1.3 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The investigations remembered for the writing survey show the adequacy of heel off-stacking

gadgets for forestalling heel PU development; in any case, heel off-stacking can be accomplished

through various systems. The inquiry emerges on the off chance that one strategy or gadget is

prevalent as far as diminishing the pressure on the heel when contrasted with different gadgets.

To address this inquiry, we used constrain mapping innovation to evaluate and think about the

contact pressures showed on the heel in a model leg by 6 techniques off-stacking strategies as of

now utilized in the facility. Our invalid theory was that there would be no distinction in the
measure of contact pressure applied on the heel when different clinical philosophies and off-

stacking gadgets were analyzed.

1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The point and goals of this examination study are as per the following;

 To utilize a pressure foot tangle to analyze foot ulcer inside the majority

 To help my insight into comprehension about my course of study

 To improve my commonsense useful abilities and to make me progressively acquainted

with the research center utensils

1.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The essential limitation of this seat side examination is that it was performed on a model leg and

not in human subjects. While the model leg was seen as a sufficient surrogate for the human leg,

certain constraints and innate blunder existed with the model. The essential constraint was the

failure to stack the leg with a similar pressure appropriation in the leg from preliminary to

preliminary because of development of the pressureing components inside the leg when the

model was moved. A slight change in the conveyance of pressureing components likely added to

changeability found in the information. Idle powers due to setting the sensor cushion on the foot

were expelled by subtracting out introductory readings with the leg and boot suspended

noticeable all around. While we see this revision as satisfactory, it is conceivable that every

single inactive power were not expelled from the examination or dormant powers were applied

during the adjustment stage while the leg was held noticeable all around. A subsequent

confinement lies in the qualities of the off-stacking gadget itself.

While the cushion created satisfactory outcomes, diverse pad compressibility or leg loads can

make the heel interact with the supporting surface, discrediting the motivation behind the off-
stacking gadget. Additionally, for gadgets with lower leg contact, especially Off-stacking Device

An, off-stacking the heel makes a critical resultant pressure on the lower leg divide that could

create skin scraped spot and pressure bruises. Additionally, the model didn't take into account the

investigation of leg portability and outside pressureing that would be available in a clinical

setting. Foot turn, leg development, and extra covers and supports can all adversely influence

off-stacking gadget execution, especially with pad strategies [8]. These confinements propel the

requirement for a clinical report using people of various BMI to affirm the pressure mapping

consequences of this investigation.

 REFERENCES

[1] K. Agrawal and N. Chauhan, "Pressure ulcers: Back to the basics," Indian Journal of Plastic

Surgery, vol. 45, pp. 244-254, 2012.

[2] N. Bergstrom, S. D. Horn, M. Rapp, A. Stern, R. Barrett, M. Watkiss, et al., "Preventing

Pressure Ulcers: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial in Nursing Homes," Ontario Health

Technology Assessment Series,

vol. 14, pp. 1-32, 10/01 2014.

[3] (2017, 10-Oct). The M.A.P.™ System | Pressure Assessment. Available:

http://www.woundsource.com/product/map

[4] I. Leaf Healthcare, "Leaf Healthcare Wearable Patient Monitoring System Called ‘Gold

Standard’ of Patient Mobility Monitoring," in Frost & Sullivan recognizes Leaf with its 2016

Pressure Ulcer Prevention New Product Innovation Award., ed. Pleasanton, CA: Frost and

Sullivan, 2016.

[5] M. Reddy, S. S. Gill, and P. A. Rochon, "Preventing pressure ulcers: A systematic review,"

JAMA, vol. 296, pp. 974-984, 2006.

[6] D. Sen and M. Crivello, "Modeling of Force Sensor Nonlinearity for Time-Domain-Based

Pressure Measurement in Biomedical Sensors," NEBEC 2016, 2016.

[7] "Standard Test Method for Peel Adhesion of Pressure-Sensitive Tape," vol. D3330/D3330M-

04(2010), ed: ASTM International, 2010.

[8] "Standard Test Methods for Shear Adhesion of Pressure-Sensitive Tapes," ed: ASTM

International, 2011.

[9] "Standard Test Methods for Loop Tack," ed: ASTM International, 2011.
[10] "Standard Test Method for Determining the Water Vapor Resistance of Sheet Materials in

Contact with Liquid Water by the Dry Indicator Method," ed: ASTM International, 2016.

[11] "Standard Test Method for Young's Modulus, Tangent Modulus, and Chord Modulus," ed:

ASTM International, 2010.

[12] N. P. U. A. Panel. (2007). NPUAP Pressure Ulcer Stages/Categories. Available:

http://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NPUAP-Pressure-Ulcer-Stages-

Categories.pdf