NMK44403 Engineering Technologies In Society

ASSIGNMENT 1

Prepared by:
SOLEHIN AZRAIN BIN SULAIMAN
201302299
UR6523009
Title: Guru besar ditahan salah guna kuasa beli barang sekolah
Origin: Alor Setar, Kedah
Link: https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2022/09/881238/guru-besar-ditahan-salah-
guna-kuasa-beli-barang-sekolah

Analysis of misconduct:
The Headmaster in Alor Setar has been detained by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption
Commission (MACC) on allegations of misusing their position in school procurement
matters. The 58-year-old female headmaster, who was serving at a special education school,
was taken into custody while providing a statement at the MACC Office in Sungai Petani.
According to sources, the headmaster is suspected of making school procurement purchases
totalling RM22,646 through two companies registered under the names of her two adult sons,
aged 33 and 31. The headmaster allegedly abused her position to engage in these transactions.
Legal implications:
The headmaster's actions may have legal consequences. Misusing one's position for personal
gain or engaging in fraudulent activities, such as channelling funds through family-owned
companies, could potentially violate Malaysian laws related to corruption, embezzlement, or
abuse of power. The investigation being conducted by the MACC under Section 23 of the
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 indicates that the authorities are examining
the case for potential legal violations.
Code of conduct violation:
As an educational leader and headmaster, the individual has a responsibility to maintain the
highest standards of integrity and ethics. Misusing their position for personal gain,
particularly in the procurement process, is a clear violation of professional conduct.
Headmasters are expected to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in managing
school resources. By favouring family-owned companies and potentially manipulating
procurement procedures, the headmaster violated the code of conduct expected of educational
administrators.
Professional responsibility:
As a headmaster, the individual holds a position of trust and influence within the education
system. They are entrusted with the responsibility of managing resources, including
procurement, in a fair and transparent manner. By allegedly misusing their position and
engaging in fraudulent practices, the headmaster demonstrated a lack of professional
responsibility. It is the duty of educational leaders to uphold the highest standards of honesty,
integrity, and ethical conduct to ensure the proper use of resources and to set a positive
example for students, teachers, and the broader school community.
It is important for educational institutions to have clear guidelines, policies, and oversight
mechanisms in place to prevent and detect misconduct. By enforcing strict codes of conduct
and providing regular training and awareness programs, schools can foster a culture of
integrity and ethical behavior among their staff members.
Title: Samsung engineers make crucial mistake using ChatGPT, leaking sensitive information
Origin: South Korea
Link: https://www.samaaenglish.tv/news/40031090

Analysis of misconduct:
The incidents described involving Samsung engineers leaking sensitive information while
using ChatGPT can be considered as instances of misconduct. The employees inadvertently
shared confidential source code, code optimization requests, and meeting recordings, which
breached the company's data security and privacy policies. The accidental nature of the leaks
does not absolve the employees from the responsibility of safeguarding confidential
information.
Legal implications:
The leaks of sensitive information through ChatGPT raise significant legal concerns.
Depending on the jurisdiction and applicable laws, the unauthorized disclosure of
confidential information could potentially lead to legal consequences. In this case, the
incidents may be in violation of data protection regulations, such as the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. GDPR requires organizations to
implement adequate measures to protect personal and sensitive data, and the leaks may be
seen as a breach of those obligations.
Code of conduct violation:
The actions of the Samsung engineers can be seen as a violation of the company's code of
conduct. Most organizations have policies in place that dictate how employees should handle
confidential and proprietary information. By sharing confidential source code and meeting
recordings with ChatGPT, the employees failed to adhere to these policies, potentially
compromising the company's intellectual property and violating their professional
responsibilities.
Professional responsibility:
As professionals working in a highly technical and sensitive field, the Samsung engineers had
a responsibility to handle confidential information with the utmost care and caution. They
should have been aware of the risks associated with sharing such information with a third-
party AI model like ChatGPT. By failing to exercise due diligence in protecting confidential
data, they demonstrated a lack of professional responsibility.
It is essential for organizations like Samsung to have clear policies, training programs, and
controls in place to educate their employees about data security, privacy, and professional
conduct. Such incidents should serve as a reminder to individuals and organizations to be
cautious when using AI models and to take appropriate measures to protect sensitive
information.