Rubric for Crop and Broiler Production Investigations
ITEM DESCRIPTOR Marks
Total Awarded Name of Student - - Student Registration Number - - Name of School - - Title of Project - - Start Date - - Termination Date - - Table of Contents - - Provided a clear and accurate INTRODUCTION (6) Literature summary of literature reviewed 2 Review (3) At least 3 references cited in 1 summary Problem statement clearly written 1 Technical /technology related Aim (2) objective addressing production 1 and post-production levels Income related 1 Experimental design clearly 1 Experimental Described Design (2) Comparison of production technology / management practice 1 / value-addition technology METHODOLOGY (11) Materials and Materials 1 Equipment (2) Tools and Equipment 1 Activities (production and processing) (4) 4
Data Collection - Data (at least 2 sets) and how it was 3
collected (3) RESULTS (9) Presented and described data including performance of Production and Post- value added products / comparison of value added 3 Production and non-value added product where applicable (3) Value Addition (where Interpreted results accurately (3) 3 applicable) Presented results properly (2) 2 Labelled tables, charts (1) 1 How technical Provided a full discussion of 1 results relate to results” the issue (2) Relating results to literature 1 DISCUSSION (8) accurately with reference Effect of the discussed the effect of technology technology used used during production/post- 2 during production as it relates to value production/ CSEC® Agricultural Science – DOUBLE AWARD Rubric for Crop and Broiler Production Investigations
after production / addition with supporting evidence
for value addition and cited relevant literature (2) Fully discussed the effect of technical Effect of technical / technology on profitability and / technology on referring to relevant data with 2 profitability (2) supporting evidence and cited relevant Literature Overall findings Fully discussed the findings as it as it relates to relates to issue with supporting 2 the issue (2) evidence and cited relevant Literature Based on outcomes with respect to 1 CONCLUSION, Conclusion (2) technical / technological aspects LIMITATION & Based on outcomes and income 1 RECOMMENDATIONS Aspect (4) Limitations (1) 1 Recommendations (1) 1 Less than 5 spelling and grammatical errors contained 1 PRESENTATION (2) in the report (1) At least 3 references properly cited (1) 1
TOTAL (Technical Report) 40 ÷ 2 …… ÷ 2
= 20 = ………
Projected Income – output, price, 1
COST ANALYSIS Total (10) Complete Budget Projected Expenditure – inputs, 1 (Please tick √ price, total which is Surplus/Shortfall correctly calculated 1 applicable) Income/Sale of Produce – quantity, 1 Actual Income & price, total 1 Expenditure Expenditure – quantity, price, total 1 (Production, Post- Surplus/Shortfall correctly calculated 1 Production) Provides a full and accurate 4 or Comparison of comparison of all 3 parameters 2 Projected and Actual Partially compares all 3 parameters 3 (Production, Post- - Income Correctly compares any 2 2 Production and - Expenditure Parameters Value Addition) - Surplus/shortfall Correctly compares any 1 parameter 1 Did not attempt to compare any 0 Parameter TOTAL COST ANALYSIS 10