You are on page 1of 3

ITEM DESCRIPTOR MARKS

TOTAL AWARDE
D
Name of Student - -
Student Registration Number - -
Name of School - -
INTRODUCTION (6) Title of project - -
Start Date - -
Termination Date - -
Table of Contents - -
Provided a clear and accurate
Literature summary of literature reviewed 2
Review (3)
At least three reference cited in the 1
summary
Problem statement clearly written 1
Technical /technology related 1
objective addressing the production
Aim (2) and post-production levels
Income related 1
METHODOLOGY (11) Experimental Experimental design clearly 1
Design (2) described
Comparison of production 1
technology/ management practice/
value-addition technology
Materials 1
Materials and
Equipment (2) Tools and Equipment 1

Activities (production and processing) (4) 4

Data Collection- Data (at least 2 sets) and how it was 3


collected (3)
RESULTS (9) Presented and described data including performance 3
-PRODUCTION AND of value added products / comparison of value added
POST PRODUCTION and non-value added product where applicable (3)
VALUE ADDITION Interpreted results accurately (3) 3
(WHERE Presented results properly (2) 2
APPLICABLE) Labelled tables, charts (1) 1
DISCUSSION (8) How technical Provided a full discussion of results 1
results relate to
the issue (2) Relating results to literature 1
accurately with reference.
Effect of Discussed the effect of technology 2
technology used during production/post-
used during production as it relates to value
production /
after Addition as it relates to supporting
production/ for evidence and cited relevant
value addition literature
(2)
Effect of Fully discussed the effect of 2
technical / technical / technology on
technology on profitability and referring to
profitability (2) relevant data with supporting
evidence and cited relevant
literature
Overall findings Fully discussed the findings as it 2
as it relates to relates to the issue with supporting
the issue (2) evidence and cited relevant
literature
Conclusion, Based on outcomes with respect to 1
limitation & Conclusion (2) technical / technological aspects
Recommendations Based on outcomes and incomes 1
(4) aspect
Limitations (1) 1
Recommendations (1) 1
Presentation (2) Less than 5 spelling and grammatical errors contained 1
in the report (1)
At least 3 references properly cited (1) 1
TOTAL (Technical Report) 40 ÷ 2
= 20
Projected Income- 1
output, price, total
Complete Budget Projected Expenditure- 1
input, price, total

COST ANALYSIS Surplus/Shortfall 1


(10) correctly calculated
(Please tick which is
applicable) Income/sale of 1
produce- quantity,
price, total
1
(Production, post- Actual Income & Expenditure- quantity, 1
production) Expenditure price, total

Or Surplus/Shortfall 1
correctly calculated
2
(Production, Post-
production and value Provides a full and 4
Addition accurate comparison of
Comparison of all three parameters
Partially compares all 3 3
projected and actual parameters

-Income Correctly compares ant 2


two parameters
-Expenditure
Correctly compares 1
- Surplus/Shortfall only one parameter
Did not attempt to 0
compare any
parameter
TOTAL COST ANALYSIS 10

You might also like