Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/342362672
Article in International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports · June 2020
DOI: 10.34256/ijpefs2029
CITATIONS READS
0 348
1 author:
Amit Bandyopadhyay
University of Calcutta
117 PUBLICATIONS 1,363 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Amit Bandyopadhyay on 06 July 2021.
International Journal of
PHYSICAL EDUCATION, FITNESS AND SPORTS
Abstract: Cooper’s 12-minute run test (CRT) for prediction of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) has not yet been
explored in Indian sportspersons. Present investigation was conducted to evaluate the applicability of CRT in Indian
cricketers. 75 male and 45 female cricket players were randomly recruited from reputed cricket academies of
Kolkata, India and were randomly assigned into the study group (male = 45, female = 25) and confirmatory group
(male = 30, female = 20). Incremental cycle ergometer exercise was used for direct estimation of VO2max by
expired gas analysis and the indirect prediction of VO 2max (PVO2max) was performed by CRT method. The current
protocol of CRT was found to be inapplicable in both the genders of Cricketers due to a significant difference
between PVO2max and VO2max and a large limit of agreement between PVO 2max and VO2max in the study groups. A
significant correlation (r = 0.76 in males and r = 0.79 in females, p<0.001) was depicted between VO2max and
distance covered in CRT. Regression equations were computed based on the significant correlation. The application
of these equations in the confirmatory groups revealed an insignificant difference between PVO 2max and VO2max and
narrow limits of agreement. Standard errors of the estimate of the regression norms were also minimal. Therefore,
modified equations are recommended for CRT application for valid and precise evaluation of cardiorespiratory
fitness in terms of VO2max in male and female Indian cricketers.
Table 1 Physical and physiological parameters of the male and female cricketers.
Mean
16 Mean ± 2SD
Difference between PVO2max and VO2max
14
12
(ml.kg-1.min-1)
10
0
45 50 55 60 65
Average of PVO2max and VO2max obtained from
direct method and CRT method (ml.kg-1.min-1)
Figure 1 Representation of difference between PVO 2max and VO2max in the study group of male cricketers
by plotting the data against their mean values.
18 Mean
Mean ± 2D
Difference between PVO2max and VO2max
16
14
(ml.kg-1.min-1)
12
10
4
40 45 50 55 60
Figure 2 Representation of difference between PVO2max and VO2max in the study group of female cricketers by
plotting the data against their mean values.
60
58
56
VO2max (ml.kg-1.min-1)
54
52
50
48
46 Y = 8.75 X + 21.85
r = 0.76, p<0.001
44 SEE = 2.69 ml.kg-1.min
42
2.7 3.2 3.7 4.2
Distance covered in CRT (km)
Figure 3 Results of correlation and regression analysis in the study group of male cricketers.
55 Y = 19.99 X – 13.74
r = 0.79, p<0.001
53 SEE = 2.62 ml.kg-1.min
51
VO2max (ml.kg--1.min-1)
49
47
45
43
41
39
37
35
2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4
Distance covered in CRT (km)
Figure 4 Results of correlation and regression analysis in the study group of female cricketers.
Acknowledgement
Author is indebted to the players who had
participated in the study.
Informed consent
All participants gave written informed consents to
participate in this study.
Funding
Departmental contingency grant of Budget Head
BI92(7) of University of Calcutta was used for the
study
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest
to declare.