Revising Essays

Crafting an essay on the intricacies of "Revising Essays" proves to be a challenging endeavor, one
that requires a delicate balance of analytical prowess, linguistic finesse, and a keen eye for detail. The
difficulty arises not only from the need to convey a comprehensive understanding of the revision
process but also to do so in a manner that engages and educates the reader.

To begin with, delving into the world of revising essays necessitates a profound grasp of the nuances
involved in refining written work. It's not merely about correcting grammatical errors or polishing the
prose; it involves a deeper exploration of structural coherence, logical flow, and the overall impact of
the message being communicated. This demands a meticulous examination of each sentence,
paragraph, and the essay as a whole.

Furthermore, addressing the complexity of revising essays requires an acute awareness of one's own
writing style and tendencies. Recognizing and rectifying personal biases, overuse of certain words,
or repetitive patterns is a formidable task that requires both self-reflection and a willingness to accept
constructive criticism. The process of revising an essay thus becomes an exercise in humility and
continuous improvement.

In addition, the challenge lies in navigating the fine line between preserving the author's voice and
making necessary enhancements. Striking the right balance between maintaining authenticity and
implementing improvements without diluting the essence of the piece is a delicate dance that
demands a profound understanding of the writer's intentions.

Moreover, the challenge extends to effectively communicating the importance of revision to the
audience. Convincing readers of the transformative power of revising essays and its role in elevating
the quality of written expression requires a persuasive and compelling argument. It's not just about
instructing on the technical aspects but also about instilling a sense of appreciation for the iterative
nature of the writing process.

In conclusion, undertaking the task of crafting an essay on the topic of "Revising Essays" is
undeniably formidable. It involves navigating the complexities of language, embracing vulnerability
in self-evaluation, and persuading others of the value in refining one's written work. It's a challenge
that demands not only skill in writing but also a deep understanding of the iterative and
transformative nature of the writing process.

And as a final note, for those seeking assistance with similar essays or any writing challenges, a
variety of resources are available, including online platforms like HelpWriting.net , where expert
guidance and support can be found.
Revising Essays Revising Essays
 According To Singer s Argument For Animal Rights
Singer brings a new set of thought to the common belief about equality. He alludes to
how the white slave owners once believed that the black slaves did not deserve equal
treatment. The fundamental doctrine of equality for a period has been tested on human
beings. The equality for a long period was vested in the treatment of women and blacks.
Racism and gender prejudice have always been the ground for the argument for equality.
However, according to what Singer posits, there is major concern that stipulates the need
to expand the thoughts towards other species. Additionally, humanbeings are supposed to
extend this thoughtto other nonhuman organisms. Grounded on the primary argument
that the doctrine of equality was set, things should not... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He claims that animals are not a part and parcel of a society of moral agents that have
the capacity to respond to any moral claim. Cohen in his fierce arguments claims that
animal experiment is justifiable, and this is a way that would help in reducing pain and
sufferings to human beings. According to him, human beings deserve better treatment
than other animals. He claims that using animals in the experiments would help in
improving the welfare of human beings (Miller 90). Cohen tries to justify his claims by
saying that we do not have any direct obligation not to inflict pain and suffering on the
animals. He further says that when animals are used in experiments, we do not violate
any of their rights since they do not have any right to be violated.
3.Explain whether or not you think the Silver Spring monkey experiments were ethically
justified. Why or why not?
The Silver Spring monkey experiments were ethically justified. To support this claim, I
would like us to relate the death of an animal and that of a human being. It would be
prudent even to kill two animals in research rather than to let a whole generation be
affected with a disease. For instance, by keeping the animals in the lab with open wounds
is a way of scientifically executing the research and by bandaging the wounds, they
would go against the intention of the research. I tend to believe that the Silver Spring
monkey experiment was ethical and justifiable.
4.Explain whether you think the brain development experiments were ethically justified.
Why or why
 Medical Case Summary Injury
DOI: 12/5/2013. The patient is a 57 year old female precertification technician who
sustained a work related injury to her head, neck, lumbar spine, and right knee after
slipping and falling on icy sidewalk. As per OMNI entry, she was diagnosed with head
/scalp injury, status post concussion, cervical strain, headaches, and right knee medial
meniscal tear status post surgery on 06/04/2014.
Based on the progress report dated 03/02/16 by Dr. Ozaeta, the patient has had a right
knee corticosteroid injection one week ago. She had to take a Norco yesterday for right
knee pain. She saw Dr. Cantrell, who requested 8 additional physical therapy sessions.
She has low back discomfort, notable when sitting. She takes nortriptyline and an
antihypertensive. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Assessments are major depressive disorder, right knee medial meniscal tear post
arthroscopy with recurrent tear and repeat arthroscopy, headache (concussion, cervical
strain), lumbar strain and cervical degenerative disc disease.
It was opined that her physical conditions are improving and nearing MMI. Her
psychological state could benefit from further counseling. She is very apprehensive about
returning to any type of modified work.
She was given a refill prescription for nortriptyline.
Treatment plan includes follow up with orthopedics, follow up with psychology, Dr.
Gandolfo for additional treatments for major depressive disorder, additional PT 2 x 3
sessions to treat the lumbar spine, additional PT for vestibular rehabilitation, follow up
with neurologist, referral for psychology and follow up with primary care physician
(PCP).

Per verification to the provider s office IW has had 13 PT visits for the back from 10/13
/15 through 12/31/15. Requested for recent PT notes, however, no medical records
received at the time of submission of the review to PA.

Current request is for 6 Physical Therapy Visits for the Lumbar Spine between 3/8/2016
and