Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An X., Zhang W., Li Y., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Wei W., Chu C. - Adv. Eng. Mater. - 2023 - 10.1002GT549adem.202201601
An X., Zhang W., Li Y., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Wei W., Chu C. - Adv. Eng. Mater. - 2023 - 10.1002GT549adem.202201601
See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
RESEARCH ARTICLE
www.aem-journal.com
(110)
in the same group, but the orientation of eutectic structure group
300 is different.
The corresponding EDS mapping of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10
200 EMPEA is shown in Figure 4. It indicates that the large primary
(200)
phase is enriched with Fe, the eutectic phases are enriched with
(311)
100 (220)
Zr, and the distribution of Co and Ni is relatively homogeneous.
(222)
(200) (211) Eutectic transformation is also a process of nucleation and
0
growth. During nucleation, one of the phases is preferentially
nucleated as the primary phase. At the same time, due to the dif-
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 fusion and enrichment of elements, the nucleation of the other
2θ/° phase is induced. Then, the two phases grow alternately, forming
a eutectic group. In Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA, the primary phase
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 eutectic multi-
is an Fe-rich phase. At the beginning of solidification, this phase
principal element alloy (EMPEA).
is not a lamellar structure but irregular shaped. With the progress
of solidification, the irregular shape gradually changed into lamel-
lar structure, finally the eutectic structure of two-phase coexis-
stage, some fine grains nucleate from liquid phase at a lower tence was formed. In addition, the characters of various
undercooling. Those grains are growing gradually forming the phases in Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA are summarized in Table 1.
primary phase. When temperature is decreasing, the primary To further investigate the phase structure information, the
phase becomes the new nucleation core. Along the grain bound- eutectic structure in the as-cast Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA is ana-
ary of the primary phase, lamellar eutectic structure appears. The lyzed by TEM. The bright-field images in Figure 5a,b show that
two phases of eutectic structure grow continuously in a “bridg- eutectic morphology consists of thicker FCC (white regions
ing” way, resulting in the formation of regular and fine lamellar having average thickness 60 nm) and BCC (gray regions having
structure. In combination with XRD diffraction analysis average thickness 50 nm) lamellae. The selected area diffrac-
(Figure 1), it can be seen that the primary phase has BCC tion patterns (SADPs) obtained from the matrix FCC phase
Figure 2. OM images of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA with different magnification. a) 10, b) 20, c) 50, and d) 100.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA with different magnification. a) 12500, b) 40000, and c) 50000.
Figure 4. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) compositional maps acquired at primary phase and eutectic phases of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA. a) Fe
element, b) Co element, c) Ni element, and d) Zr element.
Table 1. The structure, compositions, and size of the various phases in structure of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA with a simple model by
Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA. studying the solidification structure of the MPEA. Figure 6 shows
the formation of eutectic structure in Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA.
Phase Crystal structure Compositions Size In the solidification process of the alloy, when the temperature
Fe Co Ni Zr reaches the eutectic transition point, eutectic reaction will
Primary phase FCC 41 34 25 0 2 20 3 μm occur. However, the primary phases will form first in the liquid
Eutectic phases FCC þ BCC 28 31 33 8 50 5 nm
phase, which was seldom remelted and retained to room
temperature.[17] So the primary phase will soon become the
nucleation point of the new phase. The primary phase is rich
and BCC phase are shown in Figure 5c. The lattice constant of in Fe and poor in Zr, indicating that some atoms will be excluded
FCC phase is about 3.59 Å. The lattice constant of BCC phase is during the formation of the primary phase, making the liquid
about 2.84 Å, which is consistent with the test results of XRD. In phase near the interface rich in Zr, which leads to the crystalli-
addition, the two phases of lamellar eutectic have the following ori- zation of another phase. Therefore, the eutectic phases nucleate
entation relationship: {111}FCC∥{110}BCC,<121>FCC∥<110>BCC. and grow attached to grain boundary of the primary phases. At
The eutectic microstructure formation process of MPEA is the same time, due to the diffusion of Zr element in the matrix,
complex, and there is still no reasonable model to describe lamellar eutectic clusters are formed by bridging connection. It
the formation process of multicomponent eutectic structure. can be seen that the lamellar eutectic structure is mainly com-
This paper attempts to analyze the formation process of eutectic posed of FCC phase and BCC phase, in which BCC is Zr-rich
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA: a,b) bright-field images, showing the lamellar eutectic structure;
c) diffraction pattern confirming the lamellar eutectic structure including face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) phases.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram showing the formation processing of primary phase and lamellar eutectic phase in Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA.
phase, and the lamellar layer has the same FCC phase structure as curve, it can be seen that the yield strength, compressive strength,
the matrix and primary phase. In addition, in the eutectic reac- and compression ratio of alloy are 700, 1000 MPa, and 24%,
tion, the two phases of the eutectic often have a certain orientation respectively. Some researches show that the eutectic interface
relationship, which can reduce the specific interface energy of the of BCC/FCC is semi-coherent, which belongs to the strong inter-
lamellar interface and make the lamellar eutectic structure stable. facial combination with a high interfacial bonding strength.[18,19]
Figure 7 shows compression engineering stress–strain curve
of Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA at room temperature. From the
3. Conclusions
1100
In summary, Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10 EMPEA cast by vacuum arc meta-
1000
ling and suction melting has been successfully designed and
investigated. The microstructure and solidification behavior of
900 the alloy have been systemically studied by means of OM,
Engineering stress/MPa
SEM, XRD, and TEM techniques. The results show that the alloy
800 is mainly composed of FCC and BCC phases. The XRD analysis
implies the grains of BCC growing mainly along the crystal plane
700 (110). The primary phase is rich in Fe and poor in Zr. The alloy
has good room-temperature properties, and its yield strength,
600 compressive strength, and compression ratio are 700, 1000,
and 22%, respectively.
500
operating at 40 kV and 150 mA between 40° and 110° (2θ) at a scanning Received: November 7, 2022
rate of 2.5° min1 with step size 0.02° step1. Samples for XRD measure- Revised: December 31, 2022
ments were finished with colloidal silica suspension polishing. The micro- Published online:
structure was characterized using OM, scanning electron microscopy
(SEM, Sirion FEG), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, G20)
equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) operating with an [1] Y. Zhang, X. Yang, P. K. Liaw, JOM 2012, 64, 830.
accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Samples for SEM were prepared through
[2] D. B. Miracle, Acta Mater. 2017, 122, 448.
an initial polishing down to a 2000 grit SiC paper and finished with 1 μm
[3] P. Shi, R. Li, Y. Li, Y. Wen, Y. Zhong, W. Ren, Z. Shen, T. Zheng,
diamond suspension polishing, and etched by a solution containing 80 mL
H2O þ 20 mL aqua regia. The TEM specimens were first ground to about J. Peng, X. Liang, P. Hu, N. Min, Y. Zhang, Y. Ren, P. K. Liaw,
60 μm in thickness and followed by electro-polishing (temperature: D. Raabe, Y.-D. Wang, Science 2021, 373, 912.
20 °C, voltage: 20 V, electrolyte: 10% perchlorate ethanol). The compres- [4] C. Ai, F. He, M. Guo, J. Zhou, Z. Wang, Z. Yuan, Y. Guo, Y. Liu, L. Liu,
sion test was carried out on the GMT5105 universal testing machine with a J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 735, 2653.
compression rate of 1 mm min1. To ensure the accuracy of data, at least [5] Y. Lu, H. Jiang, S. Guo, T. Wang, Z. Cao, T. Li, Intermetallics 2017,
three samples shall be selected for samples in the same state. 91, 124.
[6] S. Muskeri, V. Hasannaeimi, R. Salloom, M. Sadeghilaridjani,
S. Mukherjee, Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2669.
Acknowledgements [7] Y. Lu, Y. Dong, S. Guo, L. Jiang, H. Kang, T. Wang, B. Wen, Z. Wang,
J. Jie, Z. Cao, H. Ruan, T. Li, Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6200.
This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation for Young [8] X. Chen, J. Q. Qi, Y. W. Sui, Y. Z. He, F. X. Wei, Q. K. Meng, Z. Sun,
Scholars of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. BK20220628), Scientific Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2017, 681, 25.
Research Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Education Department
[9] X. Jin, Y. Zhou, L. Zhang, X. Du, B. Li, Mater. Lett. 2018,
(Grant no. 21KJB430012), Changzhou Sci&Tech program (Grant no.
216, 144.
GJ20220153), and State Key Program of National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant no. 52231005). [10] T. Xiong, S. Zheng, J. Pang, X. Ma, Scr. Mater. 2020, 186, 336.
[11] I. S. Wani, T. Bhattacharjee, S. Sheikh, P. P. Bhattacharjee, S. Guo,
N. Tsuji, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2016, 675, 99.
[12] I. S. Wani, T. Bhattacharjee, S. Sheikh, Y. P. Lu, S. Chatterjee,
Conflict of Interest P. P. Bhattacharjee, S. Guo, N. Tsuji, Mater. Res. Lett. 2016,
The authors declare no conflict of interest. 4, 174.
[13] T. Bhattacharjee, I. S. Wani, S. Sheikh, I. T. Clark, T. Okawa, S. Guo,
P. P. Bhattacharjee, N. Tsuji, Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3276.
Data Availability Statement [14] P. Shi, W. Ren, T. Zheng, Z. Ren, X. Hou, J. Peng, P. Hu, Y. Gao,
Y. Zhong, P. K. Liaw, Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 489.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the cor- [15] C. Zhang, F. Zhang, S. Chen, W. Cao, JOM 2012, 64, 839.
responding author upon reasonable request. [16] C.-Y. Hsu, C.-C. Juan, S.-T. Chen, T.-S. Sheu, J.-W. Yeh, S.-K. Chen,
JOM 2013, 65, 1829.
[17] J. L. Kang, W. Xu, X. X. Wei, M. Ferry, J. F. Li, J. Alloys Compd. 2017,
695, 1498.
Keywords [18] M. Wang, Y. Lu, T. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Cao, T. Li, P. K. Liaw, Scr.
Co30Ni30Fe30Zr10, eutectic, microstructure and mechanical properties, Mater. 2021, 204, 114132.
multi-principal [19] H. E. Cline, J. L. Walter, Metall. Trans. A 1970, 1, 2907.