You are on page 1of 12

Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome 2021;30:81-92

https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes21022 CROSSMARK_logo_3_Test 1/1

pISSN 2508-6235
Review eISSN 2508-7576
https://crossmark-cdn.crossref.org/widget/v2.0/logos/CROSSMARK_Color_square.svg 2017-03-16

2020 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity


Guidelines for the Management of Obesity in Korea
Bo-Yeon Kim1, Seon Mee Kang2, Jee-Hyun Kang3, Seo Young Kang4, Kyoung Kon Kim5, Kyoung-Bae Kim6, Bomtaeck Kim7,
Seung Jun Kim8, Yang-Hyun Kim9, Jung-Hwan Kim10, Jae Hyun Kim11, Eun Mi Kim12, Ga Eun Nam9, Ji Yeon Park13,
Jang Won Son14, Yun-A Shin15, Hye-Jung Shin16, Tae Jung Oh17, Hyug Lee18, Eon-Ju Jeon19, Sochung Chung20, Yong Hee Hong21,
Chong Hwa Kim22,*; Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Korean Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO)
1
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of
Medicine, Bucheon; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan; 3Department of Family Medicine, Konyang
University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon; 4International Healthcare Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul; 5Department of Family Medicine,
Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon; 6Department of Physical Education, Korea Military Academy, Seoul; 7Department of Family
Practice and Community Health, Ajou University School of Medicine (AUSOM); 8Department of Psychiatry, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon;
9
Department of Family Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul; 10Department of Family Medicine, Eulji Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine,
Seoul; 11Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam; 12Department of Dietetics,
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul; 13Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University,
Daegu; 14Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of
Korea, Bucheon; 15Department of Prescription and Rehabilitation of Exercise, College of Sport Science, Dankook University, Cheonan; 16Department of Pediatrics,
National Medical Center, Seoul; 17Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine,
Seongnam; 18Central St’ Mary’s Clinic Internal Medicine, Seoul; 19Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of
Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu; 20Department of Pediatrics, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul; 21Department of
Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon; 22Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism,
Department of Internal Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

Obesity is a prevalent and complex disease. The prevalence of obesity in Korea increased from 29.7% in 2010 to
Received February 28, 2021
35.7% in 2018, with the prevalence of abdominal obesity being 23.8% in 2018. Obesity contributes to medical Reviewed April 13, 2021
costs and socioeconomic burden due to associated comorbidities. The treatment and management of obesity is Accepted April 15, 2021
changing based on new clinical evidence. The 2020 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the
*Corresponding author
Management of Obesity in Korea summarizes evidence-based recommendations and treatment guidelines.
Chong Hwa Kim

Key words: Obesity, Clinical practice guidelines, Korea


https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4563-7772

Division of Endocrinology and


Metabolism, Department of Internal
Medicine, Sejong General Hospital,
28 Hohyeon-ro 489beon-gil, Sosa-gu,
Bucheon 14754, Korea
Tel: +82-32-340-1116
Fax: +82-32-340-1236
E-mail: drangelkr@hanmail.net

INTRODUCTION Health Insurance Service, which stated that the prevalence of obe-
sity in Korea increased from 29.7% in 2010 to 35.7% in 2018. The
The Korean Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO) published prevalence of abdominal obesity among Korean adults in 2018 was
a 2019 Obesity Fact Sheet based on data from the Korean National 23.8% (28.1% for men and 18.2% for women), indicating a steady

Copyright © 2021 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity


This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 81


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

increase from 19.0% in 2009.1 Obesity is associated with metabolic mendation Assessments, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)
abnormalities such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, insulin resis- method3 and the grades were divided into classes I, IIa, IIb, and III.
tance, metabolic syndrome, gallbladder disease, coronary artery Recommendations with low levels of evidence, but clear benefits
disease, hypertension, and cancer. There is an increased risk of co- or high utilization rates in treatment according to user opinion sur-
morbidities (directly linked with obesity) such as arthritis, back vey results, were partially upgraded with the agreement of the treat-
pain, and sleep apnea. Therefore, obesity is associated with medical ment guidelines committee. In order to determine the strengths of
and socio-economic burdens due to comorbidities. In addition, the recommendations, factors such as the level of evidence, the level of
treatment and management of obesity is changing, reflecting new use at primary care sites reflecting benefits and risks, practicability,
clinical evidence. and acceptance were comprehensively considered (Table 1).
The revised 2020 Obesity Treatment Guidelines (7th edition) In this article, we introduce and briefly describe the 2020 Korean
was based on the previous 2018 Obesity Treatment Guidelines Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO) Guideline for the Man-
(6th edition), and included the latest research results. Levels of evi-
2
agement of Obesity in Korea.
dence and a variety of clinical situations were taken into account
when formulating the recommended grades. In addition, changes RECOMMENDATIONS
and developments in the 2019 anti-obesity drug market were re-
flected in the revised guidelines. This clinical practice guideline informs the arc of the patient
This treatment guideline was organized into questions divided journey and the approach for clinical management of obesity in the
into nine major topics with the goal of increasing utilization in clin- primary care setting. The guideline recommendations are shown in
ical practice among primary care physicians treating obese patients. Table 2 and include nine major themes: evaluation before obesity
The new revised guidelines summarize evidence-based recommen- treatment, behavioral therapy, physical activity, nutrition therapy,
dations and treatment guidelines. The levels of evidence were clas- pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, obesity in the elderly, obesity in
sified into A, B, C, and D (Table 1). The standards of the recom- children and adolescents, and metabolic syndrome. The purpose
mended grade were presented using a modified Grading of Recom- of the guideline is as follows. First, it helps practitioners, who are

Table 1. Levels of evidence and recommended grades


Definition
Level of evidence
A There is good research-based evidence to support the recommendation.
Data derived from at least 1 randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis or systematic review
B There is fair research-based evidence to support the recommendation.
Data derived from at least 1 well designed cohort or case-control study without randomization
C There is fair evidence but it is insufficient to support the recommendation.
Data derived from case series or observational studies
D The recommendation is based on expert opinion and panel consensus.
Consensus of expert opinions based on experience
Recommended grade
Class I The recommendation is supported by level of evidence A. Is recommended
Clinically important outcomes and the study population is representative of the population in the recommendation.
Class IIa The recommendation is supported by level of evidence B. Should be considered
Clinically important or validated surrogate outcomes.
Class IIb The recommendation is supported by level of evidence C or D. May be considered
The outcome is an unvalidated surrogate condition but clinically important outcomes.
Class III The recommendation is supported by level of evidence C or D. Is not recommended
Outcome is an unvalidated surrogate for clinically important population, or the applicability of the study is irrelevant.
Data from Schünemann et al.3

82 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Table 2. Recommendations for the management of obesity


Category of evidence and
Recommendation
strength of recommendation
Evaluation before obesity treatment
1. The definition for obesity in adults is BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. Abdominal obesity is detected by measuring the waist circumference and is defined B, Class IIa
as ≥ 90 cm and ≥ 85 cm for adult men and women, respectively.
2. Obesity is classified into primary obesity, commonly known as simple obesity, and secondary obesity, which can be caused by genetics, B
endocrine diseases, and drugs.
3. Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome, and increases A
total mortality, cancer mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.
4. It is recommended that treatment is determined through sufficient discussion between the patient and physician about the benefits and C, Class I
risks associated with weight loss. While recommending treatments for obesity to patients, doctors must ensure that patients are ready
to participate in weight loss.
5. It is recommended to lose 5%–10% of body weight within 6 months after starting treatment as the primary goal of weight loss. A, Class I
Nutrition therapy in obesity management
6. In order to lose weight, it is recommended that energy intake should be reduced, and the degree of energy restriction should be A, Class I
individualized according to individual characteristics and medical conditions.
7. Various dietary methods (low calorie diet, low carb diet, low fat diet, high protein diet) can be selected, but energy intake can be reduced, A, Class I
and nutritionally appropriate methods are recommended.
8. It is recommended to individualize the composition of macronutrients (carbohydrates, fats, proteins) according to individual characteristics C, Class I
and medical conditions.
9. Very-low calorie diet should be implemented only in limited circumstances, and intensive interventions are recommended to be carried out A, Class I
to improve lifestyles along with medical monitoring.
Physical activity in obesity management
10. It is recommended to assess participation in physical activity and conduct health status evaluation before physical activity. In patients with A, Class I
symptoms of cardiovascular, metabolic, or kidney disease, it is recommended to start physical activity after consulting the patient’s doctor.
Otherwise, low to moderate intensity of physical activity is recommended initially.
11. For weight loss, it is recommended to perform aerobic exercise for at least 150 minutes per week or 3–5 times a week. A, Class I
Additional resistance training 2–4 times a week using large muscle groups should be considered to lose weight. A, Class IIa
12. Physical activity alone does not have a great effect on weight loss, so we recommend physical activity combined with nutrition therapy. A, Class I
13. For weight loss, a combination of aerobic exercise and resistance exercise should be considered because it is more effective than aerobic A, Class IIa
exercise alone and resistance exercise alone. There is no significant difference between high-intensity exercise and moderate-intensity
exercise in terms of weight loss effect.
Behavior therapy in obesity management
14. For weight loss, it is recommended to improve lifestyle through interventions such as reducing food intake and increasing physical activity. A, Class I
15. For effective weight loss, it is recommended that a trained therapist performs behavior therapy for more than 6 months. A, Class I
16. For effective weight maintenance, it is recommended that a trained therapist performs behavioral therapy for at least 1 year. A, Class I
17. It is recommended that obese people be suspected to have eating disorders if they are observed with excessive weight or body type in A, Class I
self-assessment, various weight control behaviors to offset the effects of binge eating, or binge eating.
18. In the case of behavioral therapy for weight loss, smoking cessation counseling should be performed. B, Class IIa
19. In the case of behavioral therapy for weight loss, we recommend alcohol counseling. A, Class I
20. For the treatment of sleep apnea, it is recommended to lose weight through behavioral therapy. A, Class I
Pharmacotherapy in obesity management
21. The basic treatments for obesity include nutrition therapy, physical activity, and behavior therapy, and we recommend pharmacotherapy as A, Class I
an additional treatment alongside comprehensive lifestyle intervention.
22. In cases of failure to lose weight through lifestyle intervention in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, pharmacotherapy should be considered. B, Class IIa
23. For long-term weight management, it is recommended that drugs approved based on the large-scaled clinical trials should be used. B, Class I
24. It is recommended that the pharmacotherapy be changed or discontinued if weight loss is not greater than 5% within 3 months of A, Class I
pharmacotherapy.
Bariatric surgery
25. Bariatric surgery should be considered to maintain weight loss and for weight loss in patients with severe obesity and to improve A, Class IIa
accompanying diseases related to obesity, including type 2 diabetes.
26. Bariatric surgery should be considered in patients with failure to lose weight despite optimal medical and behavioral management in whom B, Class IIa
with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and obesity-related comorbidities.
(Continued to the next page)

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 83


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Table 2. Continued
Category of evidence and
Recommendation
strength of recommendation
27. Bariatric surgery should be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes with BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m2 or poorly controlled blood glucose despite B, Class IIa
optimal medical management.
28. Sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, adjustable gastric band surgery, and biliopancreatic diversion surgery are standard A, Class I
procedures with established effectiveness and safety.
29. Before surgery, it is recommended to obtain past medical and psychosocial history and perform physical examination and diagnostic test to A, Class I
evaluate the safety of the surgery.
30. Preoperative micronutrient examination is required, and follow-up examination is recommended according to the schedule after the surgery A, Class I
31. Multidisciplinary treatment should be considered before and after surgery to increase the treatment effectiveness and safety. C, Class IIa
Obesity in children and adolescents
32. It is recommended to prevent and treat childhood and adolescent obesity because they often develop into adult obesity and can cause A, Class I
accompanying diseases.
33. Treatment for childhood and adolescent obesity is recommended to provide the energy and nutrients needed for normal growth and main- A, Class I
tain appropriate weight with proper lifestyle modifications.
34. When diagnosing obesity in children and adolescents over the age of 2, BMI percentiles by sex and age are based on the 2017 Child and A, Class I
Adolescent Growth Chart. BMI ≥ the 85th percentile is defined as pre-obesity, and ≥ the 95th percentile is defined as obesity.
35. Individualized risk assessment should be considered in children and adolescents with pre-obesity or obesity. B, Class IIa
36. For the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents, comprehensive lifestyle interventions including nutrition therapy, physical activity, A, Class I
and behavior therapy are recommended.
37. When comprehensive lifestyle interventions including nutrition therapy, physical activity, and behavior therapy fail to result in appropriate B, Class IIa
weight loss and comorbidities are not controlled, pharmacotherapy by an experienced specialist should be considered.
Obesity in the elderly
38. For diagnosis of obesity in the elderly, it is recommended to evaluate waist circumference along with BMI. A, Class I
39. Weight loss in the elderly should be considered when the benefits of weight loss are greater than the status. B, Class IIa
40. In the treatment of obesity in the elderly, a protein-rich low-calorie diet and increased physical activity are recommended. A, Class I
41. In the treatment of obesity in the elderly, pharmacotherapy and surgical treatment may be considered with regard to individual B, Class IIb
comorbidities, other medications, and safety
Metabolic syndrome
42. As the severity of obesity increases, the incidence of metabolic syndrome increases. A
43. The clinical significance of metabolic syndrome can predict the occurrence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and increases morbidity A
and mortality caused by cardiovascular disease
44. Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in adults in Korea requires ≥ 3 of the five following criteria: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm (men) or D
≥ 85 cm (women), blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or taking anti-hypertensive medication, fasting blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or taking
anti-diabetic medication, triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (men), or 50 mg/dL (women), or taking anti-dyslipidemia
medication.
45. For the treatment of metabolic syndrome, lifestyle intervention and treatment of each component should be considered. A, Class IIa
BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

the main users of the guideline, to make safer and more effective is highly correlated with body fat mass, and because BMI can be
decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations with used to evaluate health risks such as morbidity and mortality of
clear evidence levels and benefits. Second, it provides high-quality obesity-associated diseases, BMI is the most commonly used index
evidence-based information for primary care physicians. to diagnose obesity. The World Health Organization (WHO) de-
fines obesity as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. However, East Asians, including
EVALUATION BEFORE OBESITY Koreans, have increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease
TREATMENT even below BMI of 25 kg/m2 and higher abdominal fat and body
fat percentages than Westerners at the same BMI.4 There is con-
Diagnosis of obesity is important in the evaluation stage before cern that the general WHO definition of obesity underestimates
obesity treatment. Body mass index (BMI), which is a value ob- health risks associated with obesity in East Asians. The classifica-
tained by dividing body weight (kg) by the square of height (m ), 2
tion of obesity into classes I, II, and III relies on adult BMI in accor-

84 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Table 3. Definitions of obesity and risk of comorbidity according to obesity and ergy intake by 500–1,000 kcal, in which case a weight loss effect of
abdominal obesity in Koreans
0.5–1.0 kg per week is expected.9 Therefore, based on the results of
Risk of comorbidity according to abdominal obesity
several studies, a low-calorie diet that reduces energy intake by
Classification < 90 cm (men), ≥ 90 cm (men),
< 85 cm (women) ≥ 85 cm (women) 500–1,000 kcal per day can bring about weight loss without nega-
BMI (kg/m2) tive health effects and is also relatively easy to follow. Limiting total
Underweight (< 18.5) Low Average energy intake is important for the treatment of obesity, but there is
Normal (18.5–22.9) Average Increased
a continuing interest in the effects of dietary macronutrients, espe-
Pre-obesity (23.0–24.9) Increased High
Class I obesity (25.0–29.9) High Severe cially carbohydrate composition, on weight loss. In the early 2000s,
Class II obesity (30.0–34.9) Severe Very severe some randomized controlled studies reported that low-carb diets
Class III obesity (≥ 35.0) Very severe Very severe resulted in greater initial weight loss than traditionally recommend-
Pre-obesity may be defined as overweight or at-risk weight, and class III obesity may ed low-fat diets.10 The definition of a low-carbohydrate diet is not
be defined as extreme obesity.
BMI, body mass index. clear and varies according to researchers, but diets with daily carbo-
hydrate intake of more than 130 g and less than 45% of total energy
dance with WHO guidelines for the Asia-Pacific region. Class I 5
are classified as low-carbohydrate diets, while diets with a daily car-
obesity is defined as BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m , class II obesity is de-
2
bohydrate intake of less than 130 g are sometimes classified as very-
fined as BMI 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m , and class III obesity was newly
2
low carbohydrate diets.11 Several studies indicated that low carbo-
defined in 2018 as ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 (Table 3). hydrate diets resulted in significantly greater weight loss during the
Waist circumference (WC) is highly associated with intra-ab- initial 6 months compared to control diets.10,12,13 This difference
dominal fat.6 WC is measured in the horizontal plane midway be- from the control group persisted at 1 year, but compared to the ini-
tween the superior iliac crest and the lower margin of the last rib. 7
tial 6 months, the difference was reduced.14-16
According to the KSSO, abdominal obesity in Koreans is defined Increasing total fat intake through a very-low carbohydrate diet is
as WC ≥ 90 cm in men and ≥ 85 cm in women (Table 3). In the likely to be accompanied by increased intake of saturated fatty acids
case of abdominal obesity, the morbidity and mortality of metabol- and trans-fatty acids, and several studies report that such intake has
ic syndrome, diabetes, and coronary artery disease increase inde- negative effects on vasodilating capacity at the initiation of very-low
pendently of BMI, so it is necessary to increase the risk of comor- carb diets.17-19 Adhering to a low-carb diet can be considered a
bidities classified by BMI to the next level (Table 3). method of weight loss, but is not effective in the long term and may
In some obese patients, secondary obesity is caused by genetic negatively affect cardiovascular health, so it is necessary to pay spe-
and congenital disorders, drugs, neurological and endocrine disor- cial attention to fatty acid composition.
ders, and psychiatric disorders. In patients with secondary obesity,
8
Consistently limiting energy intake can help in losing weight, but
relatively effective weight loss can be expected after accurate identi- many individuals find it difficult to follow a strict energy-restricted
fication of the cause, so discerning secondary obesity is very impor- diet.19 Interest in intermittent fasting as an alternative to sustained
tant. Obesity causes metabolic abnormalities as well, and even if energy-restricted diets has increased. Intermittent fasting has many
metabolic abnormalities are not present, obesity itself causes com- forms. Meta-analyses of intermittent fasting and time-limited diets
plications. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the comorbidities suggest that these dietary methods can result in levels of weight loss
of obesity when treating obese patients. effect equivalent to those accomplished via continuous energy-re-
stricted diet, but related studies, especially regarding long-term ef-
MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY fects, are insufficient. There is limited evidence to include intermit-
tent fasting as a method of dietary treatment, and further studies
To lose weight, it is necessary to reduce energy intake. Many are needed. The KSSO guidelines summarize the characteristics of
weight control programs prescribe low-calorie diets that reduce en- each dietary treatment.20

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 85


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY Therefore, all obese people should undergo behavioral therapy,
along with nutrition therapy and increased physical activity. Specif-
Exercise and physical activity are important factors in lifestyle in- ic methods used in behavioral therapy include self-monitoring, re-
terventions for weight loss. The weight loss effect of exercise rarely inforcement, stimulus control, alternative behavior, and cognitive
exceeds 5%, but exercise and physical activity reduce the risks asso- reconstruction.
ciated with various metabolic factors such as weight, body fat per- When treating obesity, it is very important to diagnose and treat
centage, and visceral fat, and improves lean mass and functional any eating disorders that may exist. Eating disorders should be con-
ability.21,22 In addition, exercise with nutrition therapy has been sidered when binge eating, weight control behaviors to offset the
found to be more effective than nutrition therapy alone, or exercise effects of binge eating, and excessive emphasis on weight or body
without nutrition therapy.23 shape are observed in obese people. Obese people with eating dis-
In individuals with no cardiovascular, metabolic, or kidney dis- orders benefit from psychological therapies such as guided self-
ease, and no signs or symptoms, there is no need for medical per- help or cognitive behavior therapy focused on eating disorders.26
mission before prescribing exercise for either regular exercise par- When treating obesity, smoking and alcohol consumption must
ticipants or non-participants. In accordance with the exercise
24
be reduced. Obese people should be advised to quit smoking.27 Al-
guidelines, non-participants in regular exercise can start with low cohol has a high caloric content of about 7.1 kcal per gram, and the
and moderate intensity exercise, while regular exercise participants liver produces fat in trace amounts.28,29 In addition, most ingested
may begin with moderate and high intensity exercise and gradually alcohol is converted to acetate, which interferes with peripheral fat
increase exercise intensity. Regular exercise participants with un- breakdown and utilization. Clinically, alcohol raises blood pressure,
derlying cardiovascular (heart, peripheral artery, or cerebrovascu- and excessive drinking increases the risk of hypertriglyceridemia,
lar) disease, metabolic disease (type 1 or type 2 diabetes), or kid- insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and ab-
ney disease, but who are asymptomatic, do not need medical per- dominal obesity. Therefore, controlling excessive drinking is im-
mission to engage in moderate intensity exercise. Medical permis- portant for the prevention and control of obesity and metabolic
sion is recommended prior to high-intensity exercise. 24
syndrome.30
Aerobic exercise is an essential tool in weight loss programs ad-
dressing obesity. It is recommended to perform moderate-intensity PHARMACOTHERAPY
exercise at least 150 minutes per week, 3–5 times a week, starting
with low-intensity exercise and gradually increasing the intensity The basic treatments for obesity are nutrition therapy, physical
and amount of exercise according to individual fitness level. Resis- activity, and behavior therapy. We recommend pharmacotherapy
tance training should be prescribed in a weight loss exercise pro- as an additional treatment alongside comprehensive lifestyle inter-
gram to increase lean mass and promote body fat loss, and it is rec- vention. According to the KSSO guideline, pharmacotherapy should
ommended to perform exercise using large muscle groups 2–4 be considered when non-pharmacotherapy-treated patients with
times a week. 25
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 fail to lose weight (Fig. 1). Not all obese people
respond to obesity drugs, and there are a significant number of non-
BEHAVIOR THERAPY responders. A commonly used criterion for predicting treatment
response is weight loss of 5% or more within the initial 3 months. If
Behavior therapy can be applied not only as a programmed be- there is no weight loss of more than 5% within 3 months of initiat-
havior intervention for weight control, but also for the purpose of ing the drug, pharmacotherapy should be changed or discontinued.
changing behaviors related to food intake and physical activity. As of 2020, four types of obesity treatments have been approved
Treating obesity has long been known to be more effective when for long-term administration in Korea: orlistat (Xenical), naltrex-
lifestyle interventions including behavioral therapy are performed. one-bupropion (Contrave), liraglutide (Saxenda), and phenter-

86 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

BMI 23.0–24.9 (overweight)


Measure weight, Yes Assess and treat CVD risk
Patient BMI 25.0–29.9 (class I obesity)
height; calculate factors and obesity-related
encounter BMI 30.0–34.9 (class II obesity) BMI ≥ 25.0
BMI (kg/m2) diseases
BMI ≥ 35.0 (class III obesity)

Comprehensive
lifestyle modification

Follow-up and maintenance of comprehensive Yes Weight loss ≥ 5% and sufficient


lifestyle modification improvement in health targets

No

Follow-up and maintenance of Yes Weight loss ≥ 5% and sufficient Intensive lifestyle intervention
comprehensive lifestyle
improvement in health targets and pharmacotherapy
modification

No

BMI ≥ 35.0 or ≥ 30.0 with obesity-related


diseases: consider bariatric/metabolic surgery

Figure 1. Treatment algorithm for the primary care of patients with obesity. BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

mine-topiramate (Qsymia).31 These drugs have been approved for cal treatment in patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
use in the treatment of obesity based on the results of clinical stud- and obesity-related comorbidities, and this indication is applied in
ies on long-term use. Lorcaserin (Belviq) was used as a treatment Korea. In Korea, from January 2019, the national health insurance
for obesity from February 2015 to February 2020, but due to in- plan has covered bariatric surgery performed for the purpose of
creased risk of cancer, it was voluntarily withdrawn from the mar- treatment in patients with severe obesity. In patients with BMI
ket in the Unites States and discontinued from sales in Korea. 32
≥ 35 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and obesity-related comorbidities,
These four drugs induce significant weight loss when administered health insurance benefits are applied.
together with lifestyle modifications, and result in improvement Types of bariatric surgery can be largely divided into restrictive
and prevention of various complications. Anti-obesity drugs must surgery, malabsorptive surgery, and combined surgery. Restrictive
be prescribed according to the characteristics of each patient, and surgeries include sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric band-
the presence of other comorbidities is important when choosing ing, and malabsorptive surgery is defined as biliopancreatic diver-
drugs. Table 4 guides the selection of anti-obesity drugs according sion/duodenal switch (Table 5). The typical combined surgery is
to comorbidities. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which results in both restriction and ab-
sorption inhibition (Table 5). These surgeries are standard proce-
BARIATRIC SURGERY dures that have already proven their effectiveness and safety,34 and
since each surgical method has advantages and disadvantages, it is
According to the International Federation for the Surgery of important to select an appropriate surgical method according to
Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Asian Pacific Chapter Consen- each patient’s situation. In addition, in order to secure the safety
sus statements 2011(IFSO-APC consensus statements), the indi- 33
and efficiency of patient management before and after surgery, col-
cations of bariatric surgery are failure to lose weight due to nonsurgi- laboration across various departments is essential.

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 87


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Table 4. Individualization of anti-obesity medications


Anti-obesity medication
Coexisting disease
Orlistat Naltrexone ER/bupropion ER Liraglutide 3 mg Phentermine/topiramate ER
Type 2 diabetes
Hypertension Monitor blood pressure and Monitor heart rate Monitor heart rate
heart rate
Contraindicated in uncontrolled
hypertension
Coronary arterial Monitor blood pressure and
disease heart rate
Chronic kidney Mild (50–79 mL/min)
disease
Moderate (30–49 mL/min) Do not exceed 8 mg/90 mg/day Do not exceed 7.5 mg/46 mg/day
Severe (< 30 mL/min) Watch for oxalate stone
Hepatic Mild–moderate (Child-Pugh 5–9) Watch for cholelithiasis Do not exceed 8 mg/90 mg/day Watch for cholelithiasis Do not exceed 7.5 mg/46 mg/day
impairment Severe (Child-Pugh > 9)
Glaucoma Contraindicated, may trigger Contraindicated, may trigger
angle closure angle closure
Pancreatitis Avoid if prior or current
disease
, preferred use; , use with caution; , avoid.
ER, extended release.

OBESITY IN CHILDREN AND strategy for maintaining appropriate weight and avoiding uncondi-
ADOLESCENTS tional weight loss.36-41 The key to the treatment of obesity in chil-
dren and adolescents is to maintain an appropriate weight by in-
Obesity in children and adolescents is rapidly increasing due to ducing and continuing lifestyle modifications. Orlistat is the only
changes in diet, living environment, and decreases in physical activ- drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for us-
ity. Obesity in children and adolescents is a chronic disease that is age by those over 12 years of age.42,43
difficult to treat. It easily develops into adult obesity and requires a
healthy diet and active lifestyle throughout life. Therefore, a policy OBESITY IN THE ELDERLY
of early detection and treatment should be established.
For the evaluation of obesity in children and adolescents, it is im- Body weight is gained naturally with age and in the elderly, mor-
portant to continuously evaluate obesity trends according to growth tality does not increase with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The mortality rate
and development status through regular check-ups.35 The most in the elderly population is influenced not only by weight but also
widely used indicator is BMI. Percentile of BMI by sex and age is by other variables such as comorbidities.44 Therefore, for the diag-
used to evaluate obesity in children and adolescents aged 2 years or nosis of obesity in the elderly, it is recommended to measure WC
older. In addition, since the growth and development period and together with BMI, and indicators such as the WC to height ratio
body composition may differ depending on ancestry, standard val- and the WC to hip circumference ratio can also be utilized.45
ues for Korean children and adolescents are applied. Age is calcu- Weight loss is recommended for elderly patients when it is
lated in months. Children or adolescents with BMI above the
35
judged that the benefits gained through weight loss during obesity
85th percentile are considered overweight, those above the 95th treatment are greater than the harms. Even in the elderly, weight
percentile are obese, and those below the 85–95th percentile are loss through lifestyle modifications such as diet control and physi-
regarded as pre-obesity. 35
cal activity is first considered and positive effects can be expected
Considering the effects of obesity and obesity treatment on such as improving physical function and cardiovascular index.46
growth and development, it is important to prepare a treatment Well-designed studies of the effectiveness and safety of anti-obe-

88 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

Table 5. Types of bariatric surgery


Type of surgery
Biliopancreatic diversion/
Adjustable gastric banding Sleeve gastrectomy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
duodenal switch
Schematic diagram

History (yr) 30 10–15 50 (Most historical) 20


Surgical technique Placement of an adjustable band Longitudinal resection of the Creation of small gastric pouch Sleeve gastrectomy with
to retain a small amount of stomach to achieve about 80% (about 30 mL) with diversion of duodenal-ileal anastomosis
gastric reservoir (15–20 mL) gastric volume reduction digestive pathway (bypassing (bypassing the entire jejunum
the residual stomach and upper and proximal part of ileum)
gastro-intestinal tract)
Mechanism of weight loss Intake restriction Intake restriction Intake restriction (+absorption Intake restriction+absorption
restriction) restriction
Reversibility Reversible Irreversible Partially reversible Partially reversible
Effect of weight loss 2 yr: 50% 2 yr: 60% 2 yr: 70% 2 yr: 70%–80%
(mid- to long-term %EWL*) 10 yr: 40% 10 yr: 50%–55%† 10 yr: 60% 10 yr: 70%
Advantages and The frequency of implementation Occurrence or deterioration of Difficulties in endoscopic screening Depletion of protein and trace
disadvantages, is decreasing because of gastro-esophageal reflux after of the bypassed stomach elements occurs frequently
Complications relatively high incidence of surgery Risk of dumping syndrome and Life-long supplementation of
visceral complications related to Relatively high incidence of weight marginal ulcer deficient nutrients is needed
foreign material (30%–40% of regain at long-term follow-up Regular checkup and appropriate
band removal or revisional supplementation is required for
surgery is required within prevention of trace element
10 years). deficiency
*Percentage of EWL: the rate of loss of excess weight based on body mass index of 25 kg/m²; †Long-term follow-up data for more than 10 years is not yet sufficient.
EWL, excess weight loss.

sity medications in the elderly are insufficient. Among drugs for obe- dominal obesity is an essential requirement for diagnosing meta-
sity treatment approved for long-term use, orlistat can be safely used bolic syndrome. In addition, one of the main features is that it is
for elderly patients. Bariatric surgery in the elderly seems to be
47
recommended to use WC measurements suitable for different groups
helpful for treating weight loss or diabetes, 48,49
but caution is neces- in recognition that the diagnostic criteria for abdominal obesity may
sary because the risk of complications after surgery may increase. 50
differ by ancestry. In 2007, based on the results of the National Health
and Nutrition Survey, Korea recognized abdominal obesity when
METABOLIC SYNDROME the WC was more than 90 cm for men and 85 cm for women,52 and
a recent study found that this criterion was appropriate for Koreans.
Metabolic syndrome is the term for a combination of metabolic Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in Korean adults requires ≥ 3 of
abnormalities such as hyperglycemia, high blood pressure (hyper- the following five criteria: WC of ≥ 90 cm (men) or ≥ 85 cm (wom-
tension) and obesity. Diagnosis criteria for metabolic syndrome
51
en), blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or taking anti-hypertensive
are in the process of being integrated, as different organizations medication, fasting blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or taking anti-dia-
have different criteria. International Diabetes Federation criteria for betic medication, triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, and high-density li-
diagnosing metabolic syndrome begin with the recognition of ab- poprotein cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (men) or 50 mg/dL (women)
dominal obesity as the most important etiology, and therefore, ab- or taking anti-dyslipidemia medication.

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 89


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

The goal of metabolic syndrome treatment is to prevent cardio- CHK; critical revision of the manuscript: BYK, EMK, SMK, JHK
cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes. There are two major thera- (Jee-Hyun Kang), SYK, KKK, BK, SJK, YHK, JHK (Jung-Hwan
peutic approaches to metabolic syndrome. One is lifestyle modifi- Kim), JHK (Jae Hyun Kim), GEN, JYP, JWS, HJS, TJO, HL, EJJ,
cation to reduce insulin resistance, which is the cause of metabolic SC, YHH, YAS and CHK; statistical analysis: SJK, YHK, and JHK
syndrome, and the other is pharmacotherapy for each component (Jung-Hwan Kim); obtained funding: BYK and CHK; administra-
of metabolic syndrome. tive, technical, or material support: BYK and CHK; and study su-
pervision: CHK.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Obesity is a disease associated with increased socioeconomic
burden due to increased risk of obesity-related comorbidities. Since 1. Nam GE, Kim YH, Han K, Jung JH, Rhee EJ, Lee SS, et al.
obesity is multifactorial, treatments for obesity include comprehen- Obesity fact sheet in Korea, 2019: prevalence of obesity and
sive lifestyle interventions such as nutrition therapy, physical activi- abdominal obesity from 2009 to 2018 and social factors. J
ty, behavior therapy, and pharmacotherapy. The proper surgical Obes Metab Syndr 2020;29:124-32.
management of obesity requires a multidisciplinary treatment 2. Seo MH, Lee WY, Kim SS, Kang JH, Kang JH, Kim KK, et
team. This new guideline helps primary care physicians make safer al. 2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity guideline
and more effective decisions by providing evidence-based recom- for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr
mendations with clear evidence levels and high-quality evidence- 2019;28:40-5.
based information. More efforts are needed to improve the quality 3. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Brozek J, Etxeandia-Ikobaltze-
of obesity treatment and management in Korea. ta I, Mustafa RA, Manja V, et al. GRADE Evidence to Deci-
sion (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-
ADOLOPMENT. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;81:101-10.
Ga Eun Nam has worked as an Associate Editor of the journal 4. Seo MH, Kim YH, Han K, Jung JH, Park YG, Lee SS, et al.
since 2020. However, she was not involved in the peer reviewer se- Prevalence of obesity and incidence of obesity-related comor-
lection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. Otherwise, bidities in Koreans based on National Health Insurance Ser-
no other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were vice health checkup data 2006-2015. J Obes Metab Syndr
reported. 2018;27:46-52.
5. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. Asians are dif-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ferent from Caucasians and from each other in their body
mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev 2002;3:
This work was supported by the Korean Society for the Study of 141-6.
Obesity. 6. Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L, Micic D,
et al. European Guidelines for Obesity Management in Adults.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Obes Facts 2015;8:402-24.
7. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Re-
Study concept and design: BYK and CHK; acquisition of data: port of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep
SMK, JHK (Jee-Hyun Kang), SYK, KKK, and BK; analysis and Ser 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.
interpretation of data: SJK, YHK, JHK (Jae Hyun Kim), HL, EJJ, 8. Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Hirsch J. Obesity. N Engl J Med
SC, KBK, YAS and YHH; drafting of the manuscript: BYK and 1997;337:396-407.

90 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

9. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clin Invest 2009;39:339-47.


Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Obesity Expert Panel, 2013. 20. Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines; Korean Society
Expert Panel Report: Guidelines (2013) for the management for the Study of Obesity. 2020 Korean Society for the Study
of overweight and obesity in adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) of Obesity (KSSO) Guideline for the Management of Obesi-
2014;22 Suppl 2:S41-410. ty in Korea. Seoul: Korean Society for the Study of Obesity;
10. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, McGuckin BG, Brill C, Mo- 2020.
hammed BS, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate 21. Ashutosh K, Methrotra K, Fragale-Jackson J. Effects of sustained
diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082-90. weight loss and exercise on aerobic fitness in obese women. J
11. Hite AH, Berkowitz VG, Berkowitz K. Low-carbohydrate Sports Med Phys Fitness 1997;37:252-7.
diet review: shifting the paradigm. Nutr Clin Pract 2011;26: 22. Dengel DR, Hagberg JM, Coon PJ, Drinkwater DT, Goldberg
300-8. AP. Effects of weight loss by diet alone or combined with aer-
12. Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, Shahar DR, Witkow S, obic exercise on body composition in older obese men. Me-
Greenberg I, et al. Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Med- tabolism 1994;43:867-71.
iterranean, or low-fat diet. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-41. 23. Kim KB, Kim K, Kim C, Kang SJ, Kim HJ, Yoon S, et al. Ef-
13. Yancy WS Jr, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, Bakst RP, Westman EC. fects of exercise on the body composition and lipid profile of
A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to individuals with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analy-
treat obesity and hyperlipidemia: a randomized, controlled sis. J Obes Metab Syndr 2019;28:278-94.
trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:769-77. 24. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s exercise test-
14. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, Smith SR, Ryan DH, Anton ing and prescription. 10th. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott
SD, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different com- Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
positions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 25. Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, Manore MM, Rankin JW,
2009;360:859-73. Smith BK, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Posi-
15. Dong T, Guo M, Zhang P, Sun G, Chen B. The effects of tion Stand: appropriate physical activity intervention strate-
low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors: a meta- gies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults.
analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0225348. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:459-71.
16. Tobias DK, Chen M, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, Willett W, Hu 26. Bray GA, Heisel WE, Afshin A, Jensen MD, Dietz WH, Long
FB. Effect of low-fat diet interventions versus other diet inter- M, et al. The science of obesity management: an Endocrine
ventions on long-term weight change in adults: a systematic Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 2018;39:79-132.
review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 27. Chiolero A, Faeh D, Paccaud F, Cornuz J. Consequences of
3:968-79. smoking for body weight, body fat distribution, and insulin
17. Wekesa AL, Doyle LM, Fitzmaurice D, O’Donovan O, Phelan resistance. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:801-9.
JP, Ross MD, et al. Influence of a low-carbohydrate diet on 28. Suter PM, Häsler E, Vetter W. Effects of alcohol on energy
endothelial microvesicles in overweight women. Appl Physiol metabolism and body weight regulation: is alcohol a risk fac-
Nutr Metab 2016;41:522-7. tor for obesity? Nutr Rev 1997;55:157-71.
18. Phillips SA, Jurva JW, Syed AQ, Syed AQ, Kulinski JP, Pleuss J, 29. Yeomans MR. Alcohol, appetite and energy balance: is alcohol
et al. Benefit of low-fat over low-carbohydrate diet on endo- intake a risk factor for obesity? Physiol Behav 2010;100:82-9.
thelial health in obesity. Hypertension 2008;51:376-82. 30. Baliunas DO, Taylor BJ, Irving H, Roerecke M, Patra J, Mo-
19. Buscemi S, Verga S, Tranchina MR, Cottone S, Cerasola G. hapatra S, et al. Alcohol as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes: a
Effects of hypocaloric very-low-carbohydrate diet vs. Mediter- systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2009;32:
ranean diet on endothelial function in obese women. Eur J 2123-32.

J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92 https://www.jomes.org | 91


Kim BY, et al. Obesity Management: A Clinical Practice Guideline

31. Kim BY, Kang SM, Kang JH, Kim KK, Kim B, Kim SJ, et al. 42. Chanoine JP, Hampl S, Jensen C, Boldrin M, Hauptman J.
Current long-term pharmacotherapies for the management of Effect of orlistat on weight and body composition in obese
obesity. J Obes Metab Syndr 2020;29:99-109. adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:
32. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA requests the with- 2873-83.
drawal of the weight-loss drug Belviq, Belviq XR (lorcaserin) 43. Matson KL, Fallon RM. Treatment of obesity in children and
from the market [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food adolescents. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2012;17:45-57.
and Drug Administration; 2020 [cited 2020 April 5]. Avail- 44. Jee SH, Sull JW, Park J, Lee SY, Ohrr H, Guallar E, et al. Body-
able from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-avail- mass index and mortality in Korean men and women. N Engl
ability/fda-requests-withdrawal-weight-loss-drug-belviq-bel- J Med 2006;355:779-87.
viq-xr-lorcaserin-market. 45. Zaslavsky O, Rillamas-Sun E, LaCroix AZ, Woods NF, Tinker
33. Kasama K, Mui W, Lee WJ, Lakdawala M, Naitoh T, Seki Y, LF, Zisberg A, et al. Association between anthropometric
et al. IFSO-APC consensus statements 2011. Obes Surg 2012; measures and long-term survival in frail older women: obser-
22:677-84. vations from the women’s health initiative study. J Am Geriatr
34. Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Birch D, Karmali S, Manns Soc 2016;64:277-84.
B, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network 46. Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP, Chmelo E, Rejeski JJ. Obesity, inten-
meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev 2011;12:602-21. tional weight loss and physical disability in older adults. Obes
35. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Growth charts Rev 2010;11:671-85.
for children and adolescents. Cheongju: Korea Disease Con- 47. Mathus-Vliegen EM; Obesity Management Task Force of the
trol and Prevention Agency; 2017. European Association for the Study of Obesity. Prevalence,
36. Styne DM, Arslanian SA, Connor EL, Farooqi IS, Murad MH, pathophysiology, health consequences and treatment op-
Silverstein JH, et al. Pediatric obesity-assessment, treatment, tions of obesity in the elderly: a guideline. Obes Facts 2012;5:
and prevention: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guide- 460-83.
line. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:709-57. 48. Daigle CR, Andalib A, Corcelles R, Cetin D, Schauer PR,
37. US Preventive Services Task Force, Barton M. Screening for Brethauer SA. Bariatric and metabolic outcomes in the super-
obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services obese elderly. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:132-7.
Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2010;125: 49. Yoon J, Sherman J, Argiroff A, Chin E, Herron D, Inabnet W,
361-7. et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for
38. Barlow SE; Expert Committee. Expert committee recommen- the aging population. Obes Surg 2016;26:2611-5.
dations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment 50. Marczuk P, Kubisa MJ, Święch M, Walędziak M, Kowalewski
of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary re- P, Major P, et al. Effectiveness and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric
port. Pediatrics 2007;120 Suppl 4:S164-92. bypass in elderly patients-systematic review and meta-analysis.
39. Speiser PW, Rudolf MC, Anhalt H, Camacho-Hubner C, Obes Surg 2019;29:361-8.
Chiarelli F, Eliakim A, et al. Childhood obesity. J Clin Endo- 51. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance: a multifaceted
crinol Metab 2005;90:1871-87. syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension,
40. Zwiauer KF. Prevention and treatment of overweight and dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dia-
obesity in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159 betes Care 1991;14:173-94.
Suppl 1:S56-68. 52. Lee SY, Park HS, Kim DJ, Han JH, Kim SM, Cho GJ, et al.
41. Chao AM, Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI. The safety of pharma- Appropriate waist circumference cutoff points for central
cologic treatment for pediatric obesity. Expert Opin Drug Saf obesity in Korean adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;75:
2018;17:379-85. 72-80.

92 | https://www.jomes.org J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30:81-92

You might also like