You are on page 1of 1

/1 continuing mandamus sec 1 rule 8

/2 writ of kalikasan Sec 1 rule 7 writ of kaliaksan


/3 72 hours
/4 summary hearing sec 8 rule 2
/5 enforced disappearance
/6 writ of habeas corpus lucena v elago
/7 after trial sec 18 am masbate v relucio
/8 informational privacy vivares v st therese college
/9 12 months sec 2 rule 86
/10 1 month
/11 deficiency judgement sec 7 rule 86
12 residue
13 ordinary cases
/14 bond sec 1 rule 90
/15 2 years sec5 rule 88
/16 judicially sec 1 rule 97
/17 3 months sec 7 rule 96
/18 incompetent sec 2 rule 92
/19 5 years sec 4 rule 91
/20 beneficial sec 4 rule 89
/21 heir sec 1 rule 89
/22 10 thousand sec 2 rule 74
/23 liquidated sec 2rule 73
24 expectancy sec 6 rule 93
/25 compulsory heirs sec 4 rule 76
26 no. the PEtitioner was correct in filing his case under rule 103 of the rules of
court.

Rule 103 pertains to correction of name, which covers change in first name, which
is not a substantial correction.
In petitioners case what he was seeking to change was his first and middle name
which doesnt require judicial proceedings for correction since it isnt a sbstantial
correction.

You might also like