Professional Documents
Culture Documents
If the promissory note is clear, it is not open to interpretation anymore. - not ambiguous
Promissory note
- maker (makes the check) -> payee = there is a maker-payee relationship (maker makes a
credit in favor of the payee; later on, the payee may negotiate it to pay somebody else -
because there is credit = negotiation by indorsement or by delivery) - Indorsement,
Indorsers
Bill of exchange
- drawer (draws the check) -> drawee -> payee
Is legal tender money? - YES. if the money is tendered into the right amount
Not all money is legal tender. Example: US Dollar - is it legal tender in the PH? No.
CHECK
“1,000 USD” - YES because of Section 1
(payable in sum certain of money)
CONTRACTS
- meeting of the minds (consent)
- binding
- consideration is also presumed under Section 24
THURSDAY - May 18, 2023
Obligor
- debtor (active subject); creditor (passive subject)
- obligation is to pay (obligation to give)
Obligee - transferee
PROMISSORY NOTE
- drawer (transferor)
- Payee (transferee)
- If the maker makes a PN, he promises to pay a sum certain of money to the payee
- Maker becomes the debtor (obligor)
- Payee becomes the holder of the instrument (obligee)
- Debtor-creditor relationship was created = resulting into a special contract (negotiable
instrument)
- Special contract
Negotiable instrument
- special contract
- because it has 3 requisites of a valid contract but there are also other requisites
Holder
- payee, bearer or indorsee
Check
- drawer, drawee, payee
PAYABLE TO BEARER
- Just delivery
Tangible
- something that can be touched
Where do you write a negotiable instrument? What material should a person write on?
- Durable Paper
- Can you write on a handkerchief? = If you write on a piece of cloth or leaves, it will not
be acceptable (It will create doubt.) - If doubt is created, the instrument you wrote on a
piece of cloth will not be accepted = destroys the essence of negotiability = prevent the
negotiation of the instrument
- Modern times - has to be written in paper now
- If we continue to write on clothes, it will just create doubt
The check is printed by the bank. You can either type the name of the payee or just write using a
pen, together with the amount and date. How would you sign if you were to sign as a drawer
of the check? How should a person sign?
- Name of the drawee is already printed - bank
- For bills of exchange, it should be signed
How should one sign?
- Sign using your customary signature (usual signature) - accustomed to/accustomed with
- Can a person sign with a “dot”? = Yes but you must (1) adopt the marking, initial as
your own & (2) you have the intention to be bound
- Adopting it as your own and accepting it
- Dots, Initials, Swastika Signs, Star, or any other marking
Example: Promissory Note by Nicole Bato
- Name is typed
- So how will Nicole sign? = She can sign using initials (N.B.)
❖ SECTION 2 - enumerates the instances where the sum will still be certain although it is
still to be paid in interest, stated installments, with costs of collection, or in a foreign
currency
- will not affect the certainty of the sum
A. With interest; or
Php 100,000 with interest beginning today until May 29, 2024.
- Why is the sum certain although it is to be paid with interest? = Even if there is still an
agreement to pay interest, the sum is still certain in money
RATES ON LOANS
If the parties agreed on an interest but there is no rate set, 6% (legal interest will be applied) -
originally, it was 12%
B. By stated installments; or
- Stated installment = Php 1,000 payable in 10 months, interest is Php 120.
- Installment is Php 10/month
- Why is it still certain? = You have to state the installment; as long as the installments
can be determined (Principal + Installment)
C. With acceleration clause
- The maturity will be accelerated
- Will it affect the negotiability of the instrument? = No, it is still certain because
- Acceleration clause takes place when the instrument is overdue
❖ SECTION 3
Statement of a consideration (for the issuance) in the instrument = it will not affect the
negotiability of the instrument
Example: In consideration of the bicycle I bought from you, I promise to pay to the order of Jose
Javier, the sum of Php 100,000
- Consideration— the purchase of the bicycle
- Consideration need not be stated (Sec 24 says that there is a presumption that the
instrument has a consideration)
- Even if there is a debit of the amount from the bank, it is still a negotiable instrument
Example of paragraph A, Section 3:
- “I promise to pay to the order of ….” specifying the amount to be reimbursed with
- I promise to pay to the order of Juan Dela Cruz the sum of Php 20,000.
- Then reimburse yourself out of the funds you have in your possession = SUM IS STILL
CERTAIN
Does the law require that the sum payable is in legal tender?
- No, the law simply says sum certain in money
Section 4
When is an instrument payable on demand?
- Check Section 7
- An instrument is payable on demand:
a. Where it is expressed to be payable on demand, or at sight, or on presentation; or
b. In which no time for payment is expressed
FIXED TIME
- You cannot sabay “on demand” and “on a fixed time” — only either of the two
Pure Obligation
When you are making a negotiable instrument, you are making a sentence - “I promise to pay to
the order of…”
- it is important you know the sequence = period to pay
“I promise to pay to the order of Juan Dela Cruz Php 100,000 on or before”
DAY CERTAIN
- not a certain day
- something to be determined (since it is determinable)
- Example: death (event which will certainly occur but you do not know when)
Example:
I promise to pay to Juan Dela Cruz or order the sum of Php 100,000 on the death of the dog of
*insert name*.
❖ 10 days after the death of the dog of Juan Dela Cruz, I promise to pay Juan Dela Cruz the
sum of Php 50,000.
❖ IS THIS NEGOTIABLE? “I promise to the order of Juan dela cruz the sum of Php
100,000 10 days before the death of his dog.”
- The law says fixed period after death, not before
“I promise to pay the sum of Php 10,000 to Juan Dela Cruz on May 30, 2023”
Section 6
◆ Section 6 Paragraph A - Refer to Section 17 Paragraph C
◆ Section 3 Paragraph B - About Consideration
◆ Section 6 Paragraph B - Refer to Section 24
Section 6: Seal
● Seal has different kinds: dry seal or wet seal ex: notary seal
● Dry Seal: proof of authenticity; genuineness
● Seal is a proof of authenticity and the notary public do this
● When the document is notarized it is a public document
❖ A promissory notes indicate a foreign currency the instrument is still negotiable but
payable in Philippine Peso
● Section 5 Paragraph A
○ Collateral Security - to secure or ensure the payment of money you put up as
collateral. If you fail to do the promissory note the holder will have the right to
bring you to court
○ If you borrow in the bank and the borrower cannot pay the collateral can be sold
in a auction and the money would be used as a payment
○ Pawnshops: Moveable (can be auctioned)
● Section 5 Paragraph B
○ Confession of a judgment - it admits liability and deprives you of due process
○ Due Process - notice and hearing; gives you a chance to explain
● Section 5 Paragraph C
○ Notice of dishonor being waved and this will not affect
○ It will only affect if the instrument is not due
○ Example of benefit given to the maker of the instrument - giving of notice of
dishonor; there should be a notice that the maker did not pay and the holder will
make this notice
○ The holder has the obligation to do the notice of dishonor
○ Person secondary liable can also receive this notice of dishonor as they are
discharged from liability
○ Example - the giving of notice to you (the person secondary liable)
Words of Negotiability
- Order or bearer (no substitute words yet)
Drawer
- draws the bill, check
- Drawer draws the check against the payee
Prima Facie
- latin phrase meaning "on the face"
Check
- Always payable on demand
- If you draw a check, and you date it 3 months advance, the check that you issued is not
payable on demand
- When a check is issued, it should be dated today
- Is a bill of exchange drawn against the bank and payable on demand
Ante-dating
- Date appearing on the instrument is earlier than the actual date of issuance
- Sometimes used to charge more interest (usurious interest)
- Usurious interest is not recoverable (invalid)
- Lawful rates (maximum rates of interest that are recoverable)
- BSP allow interest rates to flow depending on the law of supply and demand
- Usury law has already become a dead law
- Usury Law = the unlawful act of charging interest on a debt (including discount points,
fees and other charges) at a rate greater than what is permitted under any applicable law
or exemption from a law
Post-dating
- date appearing on the instrument is later than the actual date of issuance
Section 13
- The holder in due course can insert the true date
- But if the wrong date is inserted and the holder in due course has it, it will be marked as
the true date
Promissory Note
● Maker and Payee - principal parties
Bill of Exchange
● Drawer, Drawee, Payee - principal parties
Section 17
● Will only be applied if the instruments are ambiguous
● It is the duty of the lawyers to write clearly worded contracts
● Amount in words - shows the clear intention of the parties
● Interest can only be recovered if there is a written agreement to that effect
● When will the interest begin to run? - Will begin on the date specified in the body of the
instrument
● The interest will begin to run from the date stipulated in the instrument (agreed upon by
the parties)
● If there is no date, the date of issuance will be considered as the date to when the interest
will be running
● Written provisions clearly show the intention of the parties
● Why indorser? - The liability of the maker - principal; indorsers are secondarily liable
Section 18
● No signature; no liability
● As a general rule, only persons whose signatures appear on an instrument are liable
● Exceptions: (1) where a person signs in a trade/assumed name; (2) principal is liable if a
duly authorized agent signs on his own behalf; (3) in case of forgery, the forger is liable
even if his signature does not appear on the instrument; (4) where the acceptor makes his
acceptance of a bill on a separate paper; and (5) where a person makes a written promise
to accept a bill before it is drawn
Example:
● Signed Cardo Dalisay - example of an assumed name/alias
● On the due date, you demanded payment from Mr. Cardo Dalisay the amount of the PM -
Cardo says he is not liable because he is not Cardo, he is Coco Martin.
● He will be liable as if he signed his own name
Section 21
● If the agent signs on behalf of the principal, near his signature is seen “per proc” =
limited liability of the agent
Sections 22 and 23 will be tackled when we reach Holder in Due Course.
Section 24
● Every instrument is deemed to have valuable consideration (there is a presumption)
● Prima facie = on the face of the instrument
● Statement of the transaction = valuable consideration
Section 25
● Valuable Consideration = any consideration; need not be adequate
● Each contract has 3 elements: Consent, Object, Consideration
● What was the reason why the instrument was issued? What was the reason why the
maker promises to pay Php 10,000?
Section 26
● Holder for Value = somebody who has issued a valuable consideration
● Holder in Due Course = holder in good faith; every holder is supposed to be a holder for
valuable consideration
Section 27
● Lien on Instrument = lien means interest/claim
● If a person has a lien on the instrument, he is a claimant
● Lien = interest/reason/consideration
Section 28
● Absence = no consideration
● Failure = there is consideration but it failed
● Lack of consideration = personal defense
Example: Mr. Marzan would like to borrow from the bank but he is not allowed to borrow
money. He goes to Vince Florencio and asks. Can you ask somebody to make a promissory note
to guarantee you?
● Mr. Marzan would look for Breanna Melencio “Breanna can you accommodate me?”
● Breanna says that she does not know Vince.
● Let Breanna execute a promissory note
● Promising to pay to Ramon Marzan
● Payee - Marzan; Payee - Breanna Melencio
● “Can I indorse it to you?” Marzan asks Vince. Vince will give him the sum of money
required
● On the due date, Vince can get the money from Breanna but Breanna says that the one
liable is Marzan.
● Marzan is indeed the one liable
Negotiation
● To make the transferee the holder of the instrument
● How is the instrument negotiated? = Check Section 30
● Payable to order - indorsement completed by delivery
● Bearer instrument - you have to deliver it; no need for indorsement
● When is the instrument payable to order? - Section 8
● When is the instrument payable to bearer? - Section 9
● What constitutes indorsement? - Section 31
● Indorsement must be signed and on a separate paper - Section 32
● How is an indorsement? - must be in writing and signed by the indorser
● Indorsement must be of the entire instrument
● Requisites of indorsement - writing, signed by the indorser; entire instrument must be
turned over
● Kinds of indorsements - Sections 33-35
Special Indorsement
- specifies the indorsee
Blank Indorsement
- just the signature is present
- instrument is converted to a bearer instrument (Section 9)
Restrictive Indorsement
a. Prohibits the further negotiation - will affect the negotiability of the instrument
b. Constitutes the indorsee the agent of the indorser - no effect on negotiability
c. Vests the title in the indorsee in trust for or to the use of some other person - no effect on
negotiability
Section 37
- explanation why the instrument will not be affected
- gives the indorsee the right to transfer
Sections 65 & 66
- qualities of the qualified indorser
- taking your own risk = limited liability
Section 40.
Example: Payable to Danica Alcantara or Bearer
- Bearer instrument
- how will she negotiate/transfer it? = delivery (ex: grab, uber, lyft, etc.)
Example: Transfer to Simone Ledesma
- Deliver
- Special indorsement to Vince Florencio (not needed)
- Vince Florencio indorsed it to Thomas Estanislao
- they will have the liability of the indorser
- Thomas Estanislao may strike out any indorsement
- effect: the preceding indorsers/bearers will be striked out also (except Mr. Paras)
Can Mr. Paras go to Danica and demand payment from her at night?
- Yes because Danica is still the Payee
The holder in due course cannot collect from the person whose signature was forged
Section 23 - Signature is inoperative and does not give any right to retain or recover
Section 51 & 57 - both rights of Holder in Due Course (has 5 rights in total) but if only a holder,
only Section 51
Section 51 - Holder has two rights (right to sue and receive payment)
- Payment to him discharges the instrument
Section 56
What constitutes notice?
- It is when you have actual or substantial knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the
instrument
- Knowledge of some facts but it may not be the whole set (substantial knowledge is
enough)
- It has to be actual knowledge
Section 53
- When the instrument is payable on demand and it has been circulating for the whole time,
the holder will not be the holder in due course
- If later on you come across a NI that has already been in circulation for an unreasonable
amount of time, then you are not a holder in due course
- The check becomes useless 6 months after it has been issued (Definition of a check—
drawn on a bank, payable on demand)
Section 54
Notice for whole amount is paid
- When the holder in due course receives notice for infirmity, if there is partial payment,
then it is alright
Section 58
When the instrument is in the hands other than the holder in due course
Section 59
- Presumption that when an instrument is received by a party to the instrument, he is
deemed to be a holder in due course, the burden is on the holder to prove that he acquired
the instrument as the holder in due course
- Every holder is a holder in due course but if the maker questions your right, the burden
proof is on you (holder)
DEFENSES
1. Personal Defense
- Cannot be used against a holder in due course
- Cannot be used to defeat the right against the holder in due course
2. Real Defense
- can be used against a holder in due course
- Against the whole world
Section 28 - is a personal defense only can be used to defeat the right of a person not a holder in
due course
Unlike in Section 23
EXAMPLE OF A REAL DEFENSE: Forgery
● Defense that can be used against any holder including a holder in due course
Example: Suppose Alejandro issued a check. Suppose somebody forged his signature to make it
appear that Alejandro issued a check to Vince (payee of the check).
● A forged signature - signature made without the authority of the person
Forgery
- Deceiving somebody
Section 125
- Time of payment - Due date
Material Alteration
- Changing any of the items in Section 1
- Section 1 deals with material details
Section 124
- Materially altered
- The effect is that it is avoided
Example: A maker issued a promissory note promising to pay the payee. When Danica (payee)
received it, she changed the amount Php 1M before she negotiated it to Simone. Let’s let Vince
pay Php 2M. Simone gave consent. The instrument is now passed to Jolyne but she does not
know that there was alteration. On the due date, Jolyne presents the instrument that has been
altered by Danica and consented by Simone. IT IS AVOIDED = Vince has no liability because
there is alteration. Can Jolyne recover from Vince? Yes but only up to the original tenor
(amount).
In this particular case, does Jolyne (holder in due course) have a right? Jolyne will give notice of
dishonor to all the parties of the instrument. - Simone (indorser), Danica (payee)
Notice of Dishonor
Presentment for Payment -> Dishonored -> Notice of dishonor
Can Jolyne recover from Danica? = Yes, Php 2M. Why will Danica be liable? The instrument
is avoided except as against a party who has himself
Can Jolyne recover from Simone? = Yes, she agreed/assented to the alteration. Subsequent
indorsers are liable because they are indorsers and they have warranties (Section 65)
- An indorser warrants that the instrument is genuine and it is what it appears to be (it is
what it is)
- Breach of warranty
- All indorsers are liable in the order in which they indorse?
Section 22
Can a minor indorse?
- Infant - minors
- Infant can indorse but they do not have a liability (Real defense)
- According to Obligations and Contracts, contracts entered into by minors are voidable
Section 198
- Published on March 4, 1911
- Took effect on June 2, 1911
Section 14
- Lacks material details of Section 1
Example: A promissory note was issued by Vince to Danica. Vince left the amount blank. Vince
told Danica “You’re my classmate. You na bahala with the amount” Danica indorses it to
Hannah, the holder. On the due date, can Hannah collect from Vince?
- In accordance with the authority given
- In section 14, there are 2 kinds of instruments - instrument in lacking material particulars
- It is valid, Hannah may reinforce it as if it was filled up
According to Section 14, if the instrument is in the hands of the holder in due course, it may be
reinforced as if it was filled up (PERSONAL DEFENSE).
If however Hannah is not the holder in due course, there is no presumption that it is valid.
Therefore, Vince is not liable to Hannah. She can also collect from the person secondarily liable.
Another instrument found in Section 14. A signature on a blank paper.
- There was no intent when he signed the paper; had no intention to convert it to a
negotiable instrument (REAL DEFENSE)
Section 15
Incomplete instrument not delivered
- Not a valid contract in the hands of any holder
- REAL DEFENSE
- When an instrument is not complete (kulang amount)
Section 16
- Opposite of Section 14
- Section 16 says that the instrument is complete but undelivered goes into the holder in
due course
- Holder in due course cannot collect
- Can be revoked
- PERSONAL DEFENSE
LIABILITIES OF PARTIES
Section 65 & 66
- Warranties of a general indorser
- While it is true a qualified indorser is not liable, he becomes liable only if he commits
any of the warranties (Sec. 65)
- Under Sec. 65, these are the warranties of the qualified indorser and the persons
negotiating
Section 67
- Instrument payable by delivery = bearer instrument
Section 68
- Liable in the order in which they indorse starting with the party nearest to the holder
Section 69
- Is the agent liable on the instrument? = No. Only through 3 things
- Not ordinarily liable
1.) He incurs only liability under Sec 65
2.) An agent becomes liable as an indorser following Section 65 unless he discloses the name
of his principal; he is only acting as an agent; he is authorized
THURSDAY - July 27, 2023
Notice of Dishonor
If it is a BOE, you have to present the instrument for acceptance
Is the drawee liable on the instrument?
If the instrument is payable on a special place - it is necessary to charge the maker (present for
payment)
Section 74
● When it is dishonored
● the holder has an immediate right of recourse to those secondarily liable (indorsers)
● If it is a bill of exchange, the drawer is kasama
Section 88
Section 89 & 81
Section 79
ACCEPTANCE
● Yes
● Section 142
● No, just like qualified indorsement it will not render the instrument non-negotiable
If notice of dishonor is sent my mail, it must be deposited in the post office following the day of
dishonor