Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
Belt friction refers to a type of friction force acting between
a surface layer and a belt.The frictional force on the belt
depends on the quantity of enclosed surface. It increases
with increase in wrap and reduces when the wrap is loose.
Belt friction can be modeled by the belt friction equation.In
practice ,the theoretical tension acting on the belt or rope
calculated by the belt friction equation can be compared to
the maximum tension that the belt can support.
Objectives:
1. To study about different types of friction for different belt
material cross-section.
2. To determine and compare co-efficient of friction for
flat,round and V- belt.
Theory:
The friction force develop between the belt and pulley or
drum results in a change in the belt tension as the belt
passes over the pulley or drum.
Fig. 1 Ratio of driving tensions for flat belt
+ ∑ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
∆Ɵ ∆Ɵ
∆N – (T+∆T)sin - Tsin =0
2 2
𝑑𝑇
Now, - µsT = 0
𝑑Ɵ
𝑑𝑇
= µs 𝑑Ɵ
𝑇
𝑇2 𝑑𝑇 𝛽
∫𝑇1 = ∫0 µs 𝑑Ɵ
𝑇
ln 𝑇2 - ln 𝑇1= µs 𝛽
Or noting that left-hand member is equal to the natural
logarithm of the quotient of T2 and T1,
𝑇2
ln = µs 𝛽
𝑇1
𝑇2
= 𝑒 µs 𝛽
𝑇1
This is the final equation of belt friction.
Apparatus:
1. A pulley mounted upon ball bearing.
2. Flat belt ,round belt and V-belt.
3. Weight.
Working Procedure:
1. At first angle and belt set up was put.
2. Then a constant weight was taken for motion impending.
3. This above process was repeated for V-belt ,round belt
and flat belt.
4. Data was calculated with the given equation
Data Table:
Equation:
1 𝐹1
µ= ln( ) ; [for flat and round belt]
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹
1 𝐹1 Ɵ
µ= ln( ) × sin ; [ for V-belt]
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 2
Calculation:
When α = 45°
1 𝐹1 1 10
For flat belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.207
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 0.785 10−1.5
1 𝐹1 1 10
For round belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.300
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 0.785 10−2.1
1 𝐹1 Ɵ
For V- belt, µ = ln( ) × sin
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 2
1 10 45
µ= ln( ) × sin = 0.338
0.785 10−2.1 2
1 𝐹1 1 15
For flat belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.1895
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 1.047 15−2.7
1 𝐹1 1 15
For round belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.270
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 1.047 15−3.7
1 𝐹1 Ɵ
For V- belt, µ = ln( ) × sin
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 2
1 15 60
µ= ln( ) × sin = 0.300
1.047 15−7 2
When α = 90°
1 𝐹1 1 20
For flat belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.175
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 1.571 20−4.8
1 𝐹1 1 20
For round belt, µ = ln( )=µ= ln( ) = 0.214
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 1.571 20−5.7
1 𝐹1 Ɵ
For V- belt, µ = ln( ) × sin
𝛼 𝐹1−𝐹 2
1 20 90
µ= ln( ) × sin = 0.385
1.571 20−11.5 2
Result:
The friction co-efficient for,
0.207+0.1895+0.175
Flat belt = = 0.1905
3
0.300+0.270+0.214
Round belt = = 0.261
3
0.338+0.300+0.385
V-belt = = 0.341
3
Discussion:
The experiment has been done successfully . From the
experiment we have known different types of belt friction
like flat ,round and V-belt. Differences between different
type of belt and their co-efficient was known . Experimental
data was taken very carefully .Though there was some error
during detecting initial impending . If some error avoid to
measure carefully ,then the result will be more accurate for
the experiment. Experiment error can be minimized by
taking care .
Conclusion:
This experiment bears a huge importance in engineering
section. As a engineer we have to know the use of different
types of belt friction in many purposes . An understanding
of belt friction is essential for sailing crews and mountain
climbers. Their professions require being able to
understand the amount of weight a rope with a certain
tension capacity can hold versus the amount of wraps
around a pulley. Too many revolutions around a pulley
make it inefficient to retract or release rope, and too few
may cause the rope to slip. Misjudging the ability of a rope
and capstan system to maintain the proper frictional forces
may lead to failure and injury.
Heaven’s Light Is Our Guide
Introduction:
Objectives:
1.To about study of center of gravity and radius of gyration.
2.To determine the center of gravity for the wooden
pendulum.
3.To determine the total radius of gyration for the
pendulum.
Theory:
A compound pendulum at it’s simplest form ,consists of a
rigid body suspended vertically at a point which allows it to
oscillate in simple amplitude under the action of gravity ,A
bar is suspended at point O and is free to oscillate.
θ
O h
θ G
mgcosθ
mgsinθ
mg
O is the point of suspension .
G is the center of gravity.
m is the mass of the body.
θ is the angular displacement.
α is the angular displacement.
ȴ is the mass moment of inertia of the body.
When the body is given a small displacement θ,the restoring
moment about O to bring the body back to it’s equilibrium
position is given:
Restoring moment ,Mr =mghsinθ
Disturbing moment ,Md =ȴα
Since θ is small, sinθ=θ ,therefore;
mghθ=ȴα
so,α=mghθ/ȴ
Period,T=2π√(𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡/𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛)
=2π√𝜃/𝛼
=2π√ȴ/𝑚𝑔ℎ
Frequency of motion, n=1/T
𝑚𝑔ℎ
=1/(2π√( )
ȴ
Apparatus:
1.Wooden pendulum
2.Stop watch
3.Tri-squre
4.In key
Working Procedure:
1.The steel rod pendulum was removed from the cradle.
2.On the wooden pendulum ,adjustable mass was set to 0.3
from the pivot.
3.The edge of the wooden pendulum was gently rested on
the knife edge at the top of the cradle.
4.It was moved along until a position(h) of equal balance
was found. That position was recorded.
5.The wooden pendulum was hanged from the cradle.
6.It was pushed to one side by roughly 50mm and was
released to allow it to swing freely through a small angle.
7.A stop watch was used to measure how many seconds it
took to complete 20 complete swings.
8.The experiment were repeated for other distances(y).
Data table:
Data table for center of gravity and radius of gyration :
Distance Distance Time for Measured ( 𝑇 )2 Radius of
2𝜋
from from 20 period, T gyration2,
pivot to pivot to 0scillations (seconds) 𝑇
K2 =(2𝜋)2
mass , y center of gh (seconds) *gh – h2
(m) gravity, h
(m)
0.3 0.291 2.855 25.25 1.263 0.040 0.030
0.4 0.316 3.099 24.97 1.249 0.039 0.021
0.5 0.340 3.335 26.56 1.328 0.045 0.034
0.6 0.363 3.561 27.97 1.399 0.050 0.046
Calculation:
K0.32=.040*2.855 – 0.2912 =0.030 m2
K0.42=0.039*3.099 – 0.3162 = 0.021 m2
K0.52=0.045*3.335 – 0.3402 = 0.034 m2
K0.62=0.050*3.561 – 0.3632 = 0.046 m2
Radius of gyration,
K0.3=√0.030 = 0.173 m
K0.4=√0.021 = 0.144 m
K0.5=√0.034 = 0.184 m
K0.6=√0.046 = 0.214 m
Results:
For y = 0.3, radius of gyration, K0.3 = 0.173 m
For y = 0.4, radius of gyration, K0.3 = 0.144 m
For y = 0.5, radius of gyration, K0.3 = 0.184 m
For y = 0.6, radius of gyration, K0.3 = 0.214 m
For y = 0.3, Distance from pivot to center of gravity, h0.3=
0.291 m
For y = 0.4, Distance from pivot to center of gravity, h0.4=
0.316 m
For y = 0.5, Distance from pivot to center of gravity, h0.5 =
0.340 m
For y = 0.6, Distance from pivot to center of gravity, h0.6=
0.363 m
Discussion:
The experiment has been performed to determine the
centre of gravity for wooden pendulum. It has been seen
that, as the mass was placed further from the pivot the
center of gravity and radius of gyration also increased. It can
also be noticed that the period also increased with the
increase of distance of the mass from the pivot as period is
proportional to the square root of the effective length.
There were some differences between experimental data
and the theoretical data. Those differences occur due to
experimental error during the experiment.
Conclusion:
This experiment has a huge impact in everyday life .The
centre of mass will tell the general motion of a body. If a
force applies to the entire body, like gravity, the force can be
simplified to one acting at the centre of mass, and the
trajectory of the object can be described by the motion of
that centre . The radius of gyration is used to compare how
various structural shapes will behave under compression
along an axis. It is used to predict buckling in a compression
beam or member
Heaven’s Light Is Our Guide
Objective:
i. To observe the forward and backward stroke of a
slider crank.
ii. To observe the quick return mechanism.
Let,
l= Length of the connecting rod between the
centers.
r = Radius of crank or crank pin circle.
∅ =Inclination of connecting rod to the line of
stroke PO.
n= Ratio of length of connecting rod to the
𝑙
radius of crank = .
𝑟
We know that,
1
𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃 1
Cos ∅ = ( 1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅) = (1 -
2 2 )2
𝑛2
60
50
Displacement
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Angular position
Figure: Graph of slider position Vs crank angle for slider crank mechanism.
20 4 240 80
40 9 260 70
60 17 280 54
80 26 300 33
100 37 320 15
120 48 340 4
140 57 360 0
160 67
180 74
200 80
220 82
Displacement Vs Angular position
90
80
70
60
Displacement
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Angular position
Figure: Graph of the slider position Vs crank angle for Quick return mechanism.
Calculation:
For Ɵ= 90°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛90°)^2
X90 = 25×[(1-cos 90°)+ ] = 28.29 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 120°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛120°)^2
X120 = 25×[(1-cos 120°)+ ] = 39.96 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 150°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛150°)^2
X150 = 25×[(1-cos 150°)+ ] = 47.47 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 180°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛180°)^2
X180 = 25×[(1-cos 180°)+ ] = 50 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 210°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛210°)^2
X210 = 25×[(1-cos 210°)+ ] = 47.47 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 240°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛240°)^2
X240 = 25×[(1-cos 240°)+ ] = 39.96 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 270°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛270°)^2
X270 = 25×[(1-cos 270°)+ ] = 28.29 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 300°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛300°)^2
X300 = 25×[(1-cos 300°)+ ] = 14.96 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 330°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛330°)^2
X330 = 25×[(1-cos 330°)+ ] = 4.17 mm
2×3.8
For Ɵ= 360°
(𝑠𝑖𝑛360°)^2
X360 = 25×[(1-cos 360°)+ ] = 0 mm
2×3.8
Result:
The theoretical graph of the slider crank mechanism varies a
little from the practical ones obtained in the experiment .For
quick return mechanism ,the time required to both forward
and backward stroke was observed and the time required or
angle travelled for forward stroke was significantly greater
than the return stroke.
DISCUSSION:
The experiment data was taken for drawing a graph with
displacement and angular position of the crank mechanism.
Then data put into the graph and compared with theoretical
and practical values .The two graph are so much close with
each other .The quick return mechanism consist of a
forward stroke and backward stroke .The observation of
data indicate the forward stroke angle displacement is
greater than the backward stroke.
CONCLUTION:
In engineering field specially automobile sector this
experiment has huge applications.A slider–crank
mechanism is widely used in gasoline/diesel engines and
quick-returnmachinery. Research works in analysis of the
slider– crank mechanism has been investigated to date due
to them significant advantages such as low cost, reduced
number of parts, reduced weight and others
The quick return mechanism is a time saver. Shapers only
cut on the forward stroke and the speed of the cut is limited
by the type of metal being cut and cutter choices. On the
return stroke, no cutting is done, so returning as slow as the
forward stroke is time wasted and slows down the job. A
quick return mechanism speeds up the return stroke,
making the job go quicker, increasing profits and freeing up
the machine sooner for the next job.