SOVEREIGNTY MANIFESTO

How to think and feel clearly during the Covid pandemic

W W W. C H R I S TO F. LO V E
Freedom From
External Control

Executive Overview
This manifesto was created to
help numerous people examine
the coordinated global response
to COVID-19.
I will do this by leading you through a series of questions that
require you to think critically and independently so you can
trust that your decisions are authentic in alignment with your
values.

This will require you to consider the ramifications of

humanity’s current direction and how this trajectory
resonates with your vision of our collective future.

This manifesto will ask you to consider and possibly even

question your current thoughts and beliefs across a number
of topics. Finding your truth now will help deepen your
commitment and guide a course of actions that may be
tested in the times ahead.

Above all, I write this manifesto as a contemplation,

somewhere for you to direct your consciousness, which is
towards the overall direction your individual family is taking
as well as humanity as a whole.

I honor you for having the courage to take a critical look

at these matters and a situation that is affecting us all. The
decisions we make today will shape us individually and
collectively for generations to come.

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 1
 The Essence
A way of life that we have perhaps taken for granted but
nonetheless cherish is currently being threatened.
What is at stake is our sovereignty, our freedom of
movement, freedom of choice and freedom of speech.
There are long-term health and economic consequences
to this centrally dictated enforcement by governments
around the world.
This is not a question of whether you are for or against the
government’s responses to the virus or vaccination rollout
for COVID-19 or not.
BUT RATHER A QUESTION OF
WHETHER YOU FEEL IT IS JUST
AND APPROPRIATE FOR A
CENTRALIZED AUTHORITY TO:
• Tell you what you must put into your
body
• Tell you who you can socialize with
• Tell you if you can travel or not based on
your medical decisions
• Tell you if you can open for business
• Censor opposing views
• Close down an entire country or
economy at will
• Discriminate against you based upon
your medical decisions
Where do we draw the line between what is in the public’s
best interest and personal sovereignty? If people elect a
government to serve the people, why is the government
telling us what to do instead of asking us what should be
done?
To find the answers is easy, if you boil it down to one thing:
THE ESSENCE
Do governments and politicians have the right to:
Dictate and mandate what goes into your body?
Determine where you can visit, or if you can travel?
Decide who you can socialize with?
...Soley based on whether you decide to put something
potentially harmful and completely untested into your body
or not.
Do you believe in biological sovereignty?
Do you believe in freedom of movement sovereignty?
Do you believe in economic sovereignty?
These potent questions are worth considering, especially
as we navigate these next important steps.
If you believe at your core that you and ONLY YOU should
decide what diet and lifestyle are best for you, or what
medical treatment and health philosophy are correct for
you, or where you go and with whom are for you alone to
choose, then you believe in sovereignty.
You believe in our inalienable rights as human beings to
choose for ourselves, to exercise free will, without harming
others.
We are collectively facing a moral dilemma.
What is the dynamic relationship between public health,
personal sovereignty and freedom?
And where do you stand? Where do you draw your line in
the sand?
This manifesto wasn’t written in an attempt to answer all the
questions or tell you what to do. Its purpose is to guide your
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 2
 critical thinking mind towards evidence-based data, so you This is a movement with no central leader. It is a Distributed
can ask yourself if the path governments around the world Leadership movement based on Clear Intention:
are taking us down is the right path, collectively.
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND
To answer that question for yourself, all you need to do is
BIOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY AS AN
consider how important freedom and biological sovereignty
are to you. If you see these as inalienable rights being
INALIENABLE RIGHT
jeopardized, then perhaps it’s time to take a stand.
This means that those elected to represent us DO NOT
have the authority to take away these rights if we maintain
There is a simple yet powerful saying:
the non-aggression principle of ‘do no harm’ to others.

“If you don’t stand for something, Every country and territory has its own legal framework and
you’ll fall for anything.” legislation that provides direction and a moral compass for
its citizens. The founding fathers of the United States of
Right now, more than ever, we are being called to stand, America said it most eloquently when they wrote:
and this needs to be done en masse; otherwise, we will
not be proud of the world we bequeath to our children and
“We hold these truths to be self-evident,
grandchildren.
that all men are created equal, that they
What kind of world will our children inherit if we do not are endowed by their Creator with certain
stand up for fundamental human rights, including biological unalienable Rights, that among these are
sovereignty? What physical wars and personal battles will Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
they face in the future if we continue to let our personal
freedoms erode? Regardless of what country you live in, how we respond
to Covid-19 and its various mutations is a global concern.
This urgent conversation is much bigger than the question However, what concerns me the most right now, is that we
of whether or not to take the injection. Although I will are setting the stage for a new kind of discrimination. One
present some statistics and provide links that document the not based on religion, ethnicity or skin color, but on medical
effectiveness of this approach, the more pertinent question decisions.
is:
We have much to discuss and question.
“Should individuals have the right and
the freedom to choose their own health Let’s dive in….
directive and medical strategy?”
Our grandfathers fought for freedom and sovereignty
in the Second World War so that we could enjoy those
unalienable rights. Now we are being called to carry the
baton of freedom and sovereignty for ourselves and future
generations. If we do not stand here now, where will we
fall?

Collectively, we need to take a deep breath, expand our

consciousness and align ourselves with a clear heart-mind
before taking the next step.

Please remember, you are powerful beyond measure,

you are not alone, and all significant change comes from
grassroots movements centered around an idea whose
time has come.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 3
 Embodying the Sociological Imagination
This manifesto aims to cut through the noise of the mainstream
media narrative and asks you to question everything being
presented with a wider lens of perception.
It asks you to lean into your resistance, get cozy with your
shadows, and be open to topics and views you may not
have previously considered.
It will stretch you, press you, and guide you on how to think
with Sociological Imagination, a term coined by Sociologist
C. Wright Mills.
The concept of Sociological Imagination suggests that
who you are and how you think is shaped by your cultural
environment, including your family, friends, country, media,
and events.
However, to implement Sociological Imagination, we need
to be able to pull away from the immediate situation and
view things from a new perspective. If we can remove our
personal self from the picture and look through the lens of
pure detachment, we can see things as they are.
From the seat of passenger consciousness, we can look
down at the situation without any personal biases, beliefs
or conditioning.
To clearly and objectively observe society, you must see it
without the distortions created within that field. To do that,
you must look through a wider lens of perception.
After all, if you view life through a narrow lens, you will
only see what is in the perimeters of that limited view.
It’s like looking at the world through a straw. For many
people, that narrow view is the one the mainstream media
provides. Their influence is far-reaching, insidious and has
a tremendous influence on how most people think and feel.
As part of this manifesto, I will share with you how to widen
your perspective - to see beyond the media’s narrative and
then see how this fits into the context of the bigger picture.
The first step, however, is to take a look at the big picture
of your life. A happy, fulfilled life begins by getting clear and
establishing your values and then aligning your life to these
anchor points.
Values are the moral compass that direct critical decisions
in life. Aligning with your true north may require careful
consideration at times since to veer off course would
disturb the cornerstone of your personal foundation.
Values are often shaped by our life experiences or inherited
from the beliefs of our family of origin. If, for example, you
grew up in a Catholic household, then your current spiritual
affiliation will have been influenced one way or another by
those rituals, traditions and concepts.
However, until you examine your current beliefs and
become aware of your family and religion’s influence on
you, you’ll never notice what an impact they had in shaping
your perceptions.
It’s valuable to consider that any current belief you have
was created at some point in time through conditioning. If
you had different experiences, you would most likely have
different beliefs.
For example, if you grew up in India as a Hindu, your idea
of spirituality will include karma and reincarnation. You will
accept God as having many forms and faces. God will be
accessible to you personally through many vehicles. So
something as simple as your geographical location will
have a significant influence on your beliefs and worldview.
In my experience, all core beliefs can be examined and
explored with loving, compassionate detachment. This
allows you to test your current beliefs to see if they align
with your moral compass and still point towards your core
values.
Beliefs are what create and maintain your version of reality.
They engage your brain’s reticular activating system to
generalize, distort or delete data, so only information that
supports and confirms your personal narrative is allowed in.
Therefore, your brain is immediately presented with
something called belief bias. That’s information that only
confirms your set of beliefs, which you inherited through
conditioning.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 4
 So what I am going to ask you to do for the sake of this The mind is a valuable tool and has its role, but if we
exercise is to put aside all preconceived notions and beliefs rely solely on it to make decisions, we will find ourselves
so that we can engage your intellect without interference enslaved rather than in service.
from the mind.

The Value - Belief - Idea - Action Matrix

The first thing you need to do is anchor in your cornerstone of values.
This establishes your foundation and secures your life direction.

Please take this moment to write down all the things you value in life. Those things that
make life meaningful, fulfilling and worth living. These are your non-negotiables for a
beautiful life.

Now read through your list and see how many of those things were taken away and how many things were made possible by
the Covid-19 response. You must get clear now on what you value most so that if those values are challenged, you know where
your line in the sand is. In the not too distant future, you will be called to stand up for your core values, to stand and protect
those things you feel are fundamental to living a meaningful life.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 5
 How to Think Clearly
Now that you have established your personal values, I’ll show
you how to widen the diameter of your perception to include four
different styles of attention.

DEFINING ATTENTION: The direction of focus (narrow):

Attention is selective awareness. Our brains have a limited
capacity for processing information, so we have to focus on
what’s most important at any given moment and only take
that in consciously. This requires concentration and focus
on avoiding getting distracted.
DEFINING CONCENTRATION:
Concentration is the ability to hold attention or focus for the
time required or necessary to learn or attend to the task at
hand. It requires us to be present in the ‘now’ moment.
ATTENTION STYLES:
Attention can be viewed through directional analysis:
The breadth of focus (width):
• Broad versus narrow. This represents the amount of
information we give our attention to.
• External versus internal. This represents the object or
location of information we give our attention to.
FOUR MAJOR ATTENTIONAL STYLES:
We then move into four styles of thinking from these two
directions, based on what stage within the Idea - Belief -
Value matrix we’re in.
• Assess
• Analyze
• Attune
• Action
Here is a model that includes the two directions of breadth
and focus, with the four thinking styles. We will use this tool
to move you through the various stages to engage critical
thinking and establish your VALUE - BELIEF - IDEA - ACTION
plan. This can then be used in response to anything that
challenges your sovereignty.

LOCUS OF THOUGHT MODEL

EXTERNAL

Assess Action

BROAD NARROW

Analyse Attune

INTERNAL

As we jump into this process, remember that the intention is to bring you greater clarity and stability. After careful
examination of your conditioned beliefs and biases, you will be able to make decisions in line with your core values.

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 6
 The Four Attentional Styles Unpacked
EXTERNAL

ASSESS - BROAD - EXTERNAL Assess Action

Here you go wide with your attention, taking in as much
information and data as you can. The aim is to learn as BROAD NARROW
much as you can about a topic or situation from as many
perceptual positions (more on that later) or sources as you Analyse Attune
can find.
INTERNAL

EXTERNAL
ANALYZE - BROAD - INTERNAL
Here you begin to analyze all the external data and start Assess Action
to make a plan. You may develop tactics or anticipate a
future response, recall past information, trends or statistics BROAD NARROW
to formulate your ideas and shape your beliefs. All new
information must be stress-tested to see if it aligns with Analyse Attune
your inherited beliefs before deciding what information
you’ll accept and what to reject.
INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

ATTUNE - NARROW - INTERNAL

Assess Action
Here you begin to fine-tune and attune to your model of
reality through your VALUE - BELIEF - IDEA matrix. This BROAD NARROW
will open the doors to a new grounded, centered state of
being, where deep knowing establishes a new field and Analyse Attune
frequency of aligned intentionality.
INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

ACTION - NARROW - EXTERNAL

Assess Action
This is when you take your new vibrationally attuned state
of intentionality into the physical world, with a clear set of
BROAD NARROW
valued aligned behaviors and actions. When preceded by
the previous attentional styles inquiry, action at this level Analyse Attune
is completely aligned with all levels of your consciousness
and thus effortless.
INTERNAL

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 7
 Using Sociological Imagination Through the
Attentional Styles Model
Now that we have framed our process map of how to think
clearly and create a fresh set of values, beliefs, thoughts,
and actions, we will apply Sociological Imagination to the
current global COVID-19 response.
WE WILL MOVE THROUGH EACH OF THE
FOUR QUADRANTS:
• Assess • Attune
• Analyze • Action
To develop a framework for sovereign thinking. This may
take several days or even weeks before you feel confident
in the process and with your results.
The research links provided will require you to engage
your critical thinking muscle until you have the clarity and
confidence to see the whole constellation of sovereignty.
Sociological Imagination requires putting aside all
preconceived notions of what you think you know and what
you believe. It is common and even expected that along
the way, you will meet some internal resistance.
Acknowledge these and lean into them. See what else
is there for you to discover; otherwise, you are at risk of
remaining in an echo chamber of your own limiting beliefs
and preconditioned prejudices.
Let’s get started.

I suggest you read through the rest of this document first

and then return to each quadrant of the model with new
questions and considerations.

EXTERNAL

Assess Action

BROAD NARROW

Analyse Attune

INTERNAL

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 8
 Assess:
Broad External Attentional Style
This section is where you’ll need to go wide with your data collecting. Notice if you
lean more towards one view and away from another. This phase of the journey
requires diligence in your investigation of information and in your awareness of
personal biases. The other sections will move relatively faster once you have
completed this phase, which takes the most mental energy.

Firstly, you’ll need to perform an audit of your personal inbox to see if you are
permitting a broad range of information from various sources to enter. Then
you’ll need to closely examine who is presenting the information and what their
intentions or possible biases are.

How information is presented to you is also important. Recognize your response

to information, knowing it is based on conditioned beliefs you inherited and may
not have previously questioned.

Now is the time to question everything.

Through this ASSESS section, we will explore several
topics to help you shed more light on what’s critical
when gathering your research data.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 9
 Fear Factor

Fear affects your ability to take in information.

During the ASSES phase of the matrix, it’s necessary you FEAR OF VIRUS
expand your width, go broad and external in the search
for information and resources. Fear, however significantly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
narrows your bandwidth, so your attention capabilities
move from external and broad to internal and narrow.

Another thing fear does is drop your vibration. Viruses, like
every living organism, have their own frequency. When you
become fearful, mentally confuse or, physically exhausted,
this puts you into a lower vibration and makes you more
susceptible to illness.
Therefore, I believe the best protection against any virus is
love. Love raises your frequency and moves you out of the
lower vibration of dis-ease and illness.
Once you hit your fear threshold, your ability to receive
external information is greatly reduced. Then your brain
reverts to its default state of narrow and internal for the
sake of its own perception of safety.
This means you miss the opportunity of perceiving a broad,
external viewpoint or source of more information because
the opportunity for more options or possibilities has been
narrowed.

It’s worth taking a moment now to track how you’ve
responded to various aspects of this pandemic. Notice
what triggers brought you into a state of fear or panic and
what brought you peace.
Do you remember what thoughts or sensations were
present for you during lockdown or with the news of a
vaccination?
Tune in and ask yourself if you are honestly open, willing
and ready to consider other points of view or possibilities
about what is happening in the world right now?
If you’re not ready to hear another view or anything outside
your few trusted sources, then recognize that. There’s
nothing wrong with wanting to feel safe, but there is also
safety in knowing the truth.

Being able to hold love as a frequency set point, regardless The truth doesn’t have to be scary. However, if fear is
of external factors, requires spiritual maturity, but I’ve found present, and each of us has our own threshold for fear,
it’s worth the effort. it dramatically alters your receptivity to information and
narrows or limits the possibilities you’re willing to consider.

Fear has the effect of narrowing the breadth of perception, this decreases
your ability to explore more data points which skews your bias towards your
entrenched beliefs. These beliefs can be false narratives, placed into you from
external sources and or your childhood conditioning. Your brain’s reticular
activating system goes and generalises, deletes, and distorts information to
confirm your narrowed view of the world. This will often prevent new relevant
information from entering into your awareness.

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 10
 EXTERNAL

EXTERNAL
FEAR PRESSURES
Assess Action
Media

Government
BROAD NARROW
Pharmaceutical Industry

Authorities
Analyse Attune
Friends

Family
INTERNAL

FEAR HAS THE EFFECT OF NARROWING PERCEPTION

QUESTION:

• How is fear affecting your locus of attention?

• What information might you be missing out on receiving due to fear clouding your perceptions?

Write a list of alternative view points you might not have contemplated:

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 11
Fear has been injected into the collective psyche in several
ways. These include framing statistics and data to give the
appearance of a crisis situation and then enforcing globally
coordinated lockdowns that have weakened the global
economy.
Survival is a primal instinct for all humans; our brains are
wired to seek safety. In our modern world, many of us
equate safety and survival to our financial resilience.
So, when millions of people lose their jobs, businesses,
livelihoods and income, we have a collective, heightened
fear response. This immediately narrows our bandwidth,
preventing a wide range of information and possibilities
into our system.
What is the correlation between perceived risk and actual
risk?
One if false - illusory. The other is factual - true.
The perceived risk of Covid -19 is based on statistics
supplied to us by the mainstream media. The threat of the
virus has been determined using key metrics, such as the
number of infected people. This is called data distortion.
This happens when you focus on only one aspect (narrow)
without considering the (wider) whole picture.
This is why for my 45-49 age bracket, I consider the risks
associated with the injection to be higher than the effects
of the virus. For those under 30 years of age, the chances
of dying from the virus are .013, or less than a fraction of 1 %.
See the table below.
However, once you reach 65 years or older, the chances
of dying from Covid, if infected, are 1 in 100. “If infected” is
the critical factor. If you maintain good health and keep your
vibration high, the relative risk of dying from Covid is less.
Take a moment now to consider what your personal risk
tolerance is. Where is your line in the sand? It will be
different for each of you and yet all correct.
This is not a zero-sum question, with the only alternative
being an injection. As you will discover, when you widen
your lens, there are plenty of proven safe and effective
options available to you.
COVID INFECTION-FATALITY RATES BY
SEX AND AGE GROUP
(Numbers are shown as percentages)

The truth is that despite Covid, the World Population Clock

numbers continue to grow. Age Group Male Female Mean
0-4 0.003 0.003 0.003
VIEW CENSUS
5-9 0.001 0.001 0.001
The overall survival rate for those who have contracted 10-14 0.001 0.001 0.001
the virus is 99.6%. This number increases significantly 15-19 0.003 0.002 0.003
the further down the age brackets you go. Do your own
research. 20-24 0.008 0.005 0.006
25-29 0.017 0.009 0.013
As you move up the age brackets or include comorbidities, 30-34 0.033 0.015 0.024
there is no discounting that the relative risk of complications
or death from Covid increases. However, with a 99.6% 35-39 0.056 0.025 0.040
overall survival rate, including the aged and those with 40-44 0.106 0.044 0.075
preexisting conditions, the risks associated with the
45-49 0.168 0.073 0.121
injection seem far more concerning.
50-54 0.291 0.123 0.207
With so much controversy and concern around this hastily 55-59 0.448 0.197 0.323
approved and previously untested technology, mRNA is
60-64 0.595 0.318 0.456
not a vaccination by definition. There are no latent Covid-19
cells that your body can then respond to by creating 65-69 1.452 0.698 1.075
antibodies. That is why the injection does not prevent you 70-74 2.307 1.042 1.674
from getting or spreading the virus or its variants.
75-79 4.260 2.145 3.203
80+ 10.825 5.759 8.292

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 12
 Dissolving Fear of Death

The fear of dying is inherent. All life wants to continue its journey
of living. However, what makes humans an evolved species is
our ability to be aware of awareness. We are both instinctual and
contemplative.

Those who have contemplated life and death and have Increased fear means you cannot take in more information;
a strong foundation of faith or vast spiritual experiences your lens of perception is narrow and contracted. Do you
understand that consciousness is never born and never want to make important decisions about your health and
dies. You are pure consciousness inhabiting a body and will safety with limited information because fear narrows your
continue beyond the death of the body. This knowledge choices?
liberates you from the fear of death and gives you a broader
perspective on life. How much information and how many different perspectives
are you willing to explore?
Take a moment to gauge your fear of death on a scale from
1 - 10. One being no fear and 10 being extreme fear. Unless
you’ve faced real danger or had a near-death experience, QUANTITY OF DATA AND PERSPECTIVE
this isn’t easy to assess.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Once you have your number, realize that as your fear of

death increases your risk tolerance and bandwidth of
attention decreases.

FEAR OF DEATH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Belief Rigidity
Are your personal beliefs fixed, predetermined and rigid? Or are
you open and flexible enough to consider other perspectives and
evidence that may be contrary?

For this process to be helpful, we’ll include the Sociological BELIEF FLEXIBILITY
Imagination model, which requires you to take a bird’s eye
view and consider other possibilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

If you can do that, then let’s carry on.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 13
 The Trusted News Initiative
Unfortunately, in your attempt to make informed decisions,
you may not realize that some data is unavailable to the
average person. There is a coordinated effort to silence
concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the mRNA
vaccine.
However, thousands of independent career scientists,
reputable researchers, respected physicians, and
concerned health practitioners have questioned this one-
size-fits-all approach.
Moreover, their attempts to share patient outcomes and
research findings with colleagues and the public have
been systematically scrubbed from the news and social
media platforms.
May I suggest you look at The Trusted News Initiative - a
BBC-led organization censoring public health experts who
oppose the official narrative on COVID-19. Then consider
how crucial healthy debate and freedom of speech are
to you because these fundamental rights are rapidly
disappearing.
VIEW ARTICLE
A look back in history shows us that anytime the masses
have ceded to a singular authority as the undisputed
source of truth, the result is tyranny.
Today, we see dictatorial power, the forcible suppression
of opposition, and the strong regimentation of society and
the economy. That, by the way, is the definition of Fascism.
What is your scale of tolerance for forcible suppression?
Do you believe we still have the right to exercise freedom
of speech and have intelligent debates?
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND DEBATE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SOME CRITICAL QUESTIONS YOU
MAY NEED TO CONTEMPLATE:
• Why are world-renowned medical
authorities and respected scientists
being de-platformed from social
media and threatened with losing their
professional licenses?
• Do you think an open and respectable
debate is a reasonable strategy for
gaining information related to Covid-19?
• Do the characteristics of Fascism
resemble anything you are currently
witnessing in the world or personally
experiencing?
• Why is the high-risk lockdown
approach to Covid-19 universally
mandated rather than targeting specific
at-risk sectors of the population?
• Are you open to hearing the opinions
of some independent experts who,
despite having worthy credentials, have
been censored by tahe mainstream
media?
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 14
 Role of Media
The media is funded through advertising and sponsorship, Check those figures on the link or see the chart below:
primarily by their wealthiest patron, the pharmaceutical
industry. The multi-trillion dollar industry has pockets deep VIEW FIGURES
enough to control what is written and what’s not.

Therefore, it’s of no surprise that as the story of Covid-19 Pharmaceutical industry direct to consumer
was unfolding, the media neglected to publish reports of spending on traditional media in the
successful, early out-patient treatment protocols. United States from 2016 to 2020

Because treating symptoms was not within the guidelines

set out by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the
Center for Disease Control (CDC), their recommendations
were to stay home and not socialize.

Isolation is at the top of the Chart of Coercion, used

by Communists in their Coercive Methods for Eliciting
Individual Compliance.
6.32 6.17 6.45 6.52 5.78

You will notice many similarities between that chart and

your Covid lockdown experience, including isolation,
monopolization of perception and enforcing trivial
demands. For the complete list, go here:

VIEW CHART They also spend enormous amounts of money lobbying

politicians in the United States. With the experimental
If you would like to do your own research into this conflict- injection waiting in the wings during the arrival of Covid-19
of-interest relationship between the pharmaceutical in 2020, is it any surprise that the industry reached a record
industry and the media, you can start here: high of $3.48 billion in spending that year?

VIEW FACT SHEET VIEW SOURCE

The healthcare sector plays a massive role in the US

economy, which employs 36 ½ million Americans and

!
accounts for 24% of its government spending, which in
2019 was $1.2 trillion.

The Health Industry (an oxymoron)

spent $6.52 billion in 2019 and 5.78
billion in 2020 on direct consumer
advertising of pharmaceuticals, not
on healthy lifestyle or dietary options.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 15
HERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS TO
CONTEMPLATE:

• Do you think the media can remain

neutral with that much money at stake
from their premier client?

• Do you think this much political lobbying

and media money could have influenced
the coverage of the facts and data
around Covid -19?

• What does the pharmaceutical industry

stand to gain from a worldwide
vaccination program?

• If your primary source of information

comes from mainstream media, and Big
Pharma is their largest client, will your
exposure be wide and external or narrow
and internal?

• Have you ever considered who owns the

media publication you are reading?

• What their political viewpoints are, or

their social beliefs and biases?

• Would it surprise you to learn that there

are only six companies that own most of
the world’s media channels?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 16
 A list, developed 30 years ago, of the main strategies the
OWNER:
media uses to influence thinking is as relevant today as it
Summer Redstone
was then. These include:
$4.6 billion net worth
• Exaggerate the Problem - (remember the survival rate
CEO: among the infected in all age groups is approximately
Bob Iger 98%)
$44.9 million annual salary • Postpone Strategy - to convince people to make a hard
decision because it’s ‘necessary’. (Make the vaccination
available only after several prolonged lockdowns.)
CEO:

Jeff Bewkes • Make information more emotional and less logical -

$32.5 million annual salary
CEO:
Brian L. Roberts
$40.8 million annual salary
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN:
“Vaccinations are the only solution and required before
we can return to normal life.” (Even though masks will
still be required and the injection does not prevent you
from getting or spreading the virus.)
• Make people feel guilty - (Have you heard this
statement: “If you don’t get vaccinated, you are putting
others at risk.”)?

Rupert Murdoch • Be kind - (They are offering the vaccines for free...
$22.3 million annual salary NO, you will pay with your tax dollars and the
pharmaceutical industry will make billions of dollars.)

PRESIDENT / CEO:

Kazuo Hirai
$4.9 million annual salary

• With the mainstream media consolidated

into just a few hands and funded primarily
For a deeper investigation, follow this link: by the pharmaceutical industry, is it
possible they have enough power to
VIEW INFOGRAPHIC influence a unified global narrative?

No matter how you look at it, that is a massive consolidation

of potential propaganda power. The term propaganda
simply means information with an agenda.
All media sources have an overt agenda to get your
attention. To do that, they use sensationalism.
Regardless of your personal opinion, the media loved
Donald Trump. He was an easy target who grabbed
people’s attention.
• Have you ever wondered why the media
message worldwide delivers just one
narrative (global vaccination) as the only
undebatable viable solution?
• Do you think it’s at all possible their
wealthiest client may have influenced the
media in developing this narrative?

Within the industry itself, there are left-leaning and right-

rating publications, each serving the interests of its
shareholders and owners.

If you look closely, you’ll see how the mainstream media

uses all sorts of techniques to manipulate perception. This
includes misleading headlines, which are sometimes the
only thing people read.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 17
 Controlling The Narrative

So, since we are still in our ASSESS phase, we need to examine the
global pandemic narrative to ascertain the agenda behind it.

A narrative is simply a description or account of a series of Do you think it has anything to do with the close relationship
events linked together to create a story. The media loves to between the media and the pharmaceutical industries?
tell stories to make sense of what’s happening. Remember,
sensational stories get more attention. This leads into the next question you are probably asking:

How do politics and governments fit into this?

Remember how much money the pharmaceutical industry

USING SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION
spends on lobbying?
(OBJECTIVE, DETACHED VIEWING),
ASK YOURSELF THE FOLLOWING I’d like to share my perception of the direction the media
QUESTIONS: is steering the psychology of people. But please do not
accept my observations as your truth. Dig deeper and
• How many solutions to treating Covid does explore for yourself, formulate your own opinions and ideas
the media provide? based upon your own research.

• Why are alternative health strategies being
ignored or invalidated?
• What is the predominant emotion the
media is anchoring?
• What is the emotional effect on the
consciousness of the masses?
• What and how are they framing events?
Just remember, you need to go wide and external. Turn
over every rock until you feel you have a comprehensive
analysis of the big picture.
YOUR OPINION OF THE MEDIA’S
PERCEPTION-SHAPING DIRECTION
Now that you’ve done some research, and hopefully you
applied Sociological Imagination to your investigation, let
me ask you this.

• How is the framing of these events In your own words, how do you feel the mainstream media
determining future responses? is shaping perception?

• What is the unified narrative of the

mainstream media?

The media uses synchronized and coordinated reporting

to move public thinking and decision-making towards only
one acceptable course of action.

What do you think this course of action is?

Why is any debate about the pros and cons of this course
of action simply not allowed to take place?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 18
 Creation of Vaccination Narrative
What emerged from the Covid-19 virus is a narrative that
has driven the psychology of society down a singular route
with little pause or contemplation in consideration of the
long-term consequences:
“COVID-19 is very dangerous and the only
way out for our society is to get everyone
vaccinated.”
The mainstream media, including the large internet mega-
giants responsible for controlling search results, participate
in widespread censorship of any narrative outside of, or
opposition to, the vaccination narrative.
In an open, free society, the ability to enter into intelligent
debate on any topic is essential. When the ability or right to
a discussion is removed, a couple of things happen.
First, no friction is applied to the narrative. To truly stress
test an idea, it must be explored from different angles to
see if it still stacks up after coming under scrutiny.
Absence of Health Narrative
• Have you noticed a complete absence
in the mainstream media about the
importance of maintaining good health?
About the importance of fresh air, exercise
and community?
• Why do some people get the virus and
others don’t?
• Is the virus only visiting certain people and
avoiding others?
Of course not.
Because it’s not the virus that determines the outcome,
it’s the host. If the host is healthy, the virus can’t survive
because the body protects itself. That’s its primary function
- to stay alive.
W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E
Censorship eliminates the conversations that are necessary
to elevate the best ideas to the top.
So-called, Free Thinkers like to question everything; only
those with rigid agendas or something to hide isn’t open
to debate. Free Thinkers also tend to look for information
beyond primary sources and often come to conclusions
outside popular opinions.
Without Free Thinkers or those who question the singular
Covid narrative, we wouldn’t have another opinion to
consider on this topic. However, our ability to hear from
some of these other voices, including some of the world’s
leading medical scientists, virologists, immunologists and
victims of adverse reactions, is being limited. They are
deliberately being silenced.
Freedom of Speech is a fundamental human right that
should be protected by law, not eliminated by powerful
tech companies and media moguls.
A healthy body operates at a higher vibration, which makes
it incompatible with the lower vibration of rogue viruses. I
say rogue because our body has its own supply of naturally
occurring viruses and bacteria that are beneficial and help
maintain a healthy ecosystem in our bodies.
However, if a body is run down from stress, poor sleep, lack
of exercise, a poor diet, excessive fear or anxiety, then the
immune system is compromised and more susceptible to
viral attacks.
So why isn’t the media promoting proven, natural strategies
to increase the immune system?
Why is the media promoting only one solution that neither
protects the body from the virus but possibly weakens it?
When something isn’t logical - when something just doesn’t
make any sense, one road to reality is found by following
the money trail.
Who stands to gain the most, monetarily, through the
singular vaccination narrative?
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 19
 Narrative Contemplations
CONSIDER:
• Why can’t the scientific and medical
community have an open and intelligent
debate about the efficacy and
effectiveness of the vaccine?
• Is the media creating pressure to take the
vaccination?
• What role is the government playing in
upholding your right to make personal
health decisions?
• Why are your once private medical decisions
and health preferences now up for public
review?
• Would restrictions to your essential freedom
of movement rights, affecting your ability
to travel, go shopping, visit restaurants, or
attend concerts, motivate you to take the
injection?
• Without the media narrative, would you
otherwise voluntarily take a hastily made,
experimental, untested vaccination (mRNA)
for a virus that has an overall death rate of
less than 1%?
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 20
 COVID INFECTION-FATALITY RATES BY SEX AND AGE GROUP
(Numbers are shown as percentages)

Age Group Male Female Mean

0-4 0.003 0.003 0.003
5-9 0.001 0.001 0.001
10-14 0.001 0.001 0.001
15-19 0.003 0.002 0.003
20-24 0.008 0.005 0.006
25-29 0.017 0.009 0.013
30-34 0.033 0.015 0.024
35-39 0.056 0.025 0.040
40-44 0.106 0.044 0.075
45-49 0.168 0.073 0.121
50-54 0.291 0.123 0.207
55-59 0.448 0.197 0.323
60-64 0.595 0.318 0.456
65-69 1.452 0.698 1.075
70-74 2.307 1.042 1.674
75-79 4.260 2.145 3.203
80+ 10.825 5.759 8.292

Another way to look at this data is by looking at recovery rates:

COVID-19 Recovery Rates By Age - Thru August 23rd

Age August 23rd August 16th August 9th August 2nd

Age 0 - 19 99.982% 99.981% 99.980% 99.978%

Age 20 - 49 99.72% 99.72% 99.72% 99.71%

Age 50 - 69 97.31% 97.31% 97.28% 97.29%

Age 70+ 82.43 82.43% 82.15% 80.95%

The data here shows that you are extremely unlikely to
die of Covid-19 if you are under the age of 70, regardless
of your health! However, on WHO’s website, they estimate
290 - 650 thousand deaths occur each year from
seasonal influenza - aka the common cold.
Note: Recovery rates among Covid patients rise even
higher if the methods for recording the cause of death
aren’t based on the March 24, 2020, COVID-19 Alert No. 2
guidelines, which are proven to have violated the PRA and
IQA standards for testing. (See skewed statistics below.)
Is the closure of millions of businesses, the loss
of billions of livelihoods and trillions the best
way to deal with a virus that is statistically most
problematic for those over 70?
Why are small businesses being asked to close
while big companies are allowed to remain open?
Why aren’t the increased number of suicides,
growing abuse of children, and increased family
violence being reported?

Although every person is in a different category of risk,
according to age, preexisting health concerns and
economic status, several questions arise:
Is the best approach to shut down the economies
of the world?
Is the implementation of mass vaccinations
benefiting anyone? Follow the money.
Are vaccines that are causing immediate adverse
reactions and even death acceptable?

Why not simply isolate and protect the vulnerable

and keep everything else open?

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 21
 Skewed Statistics
Data manipulation was a necessary strategy health
organizations, governments and the media used to
engender fear and convince people to accept the
lockdown.
Statistics can be presented to support any agenda.
With that in mind, I would still like to share some peer-
reviewed conducted research papers that confirm the CDC
manipulated statistical data to support the global narrative.
These provide further information about the changes in
reporting that happened just as COVID-19 hit and the
subsequent influence on the data.
This is critical information to consider in your ASSESS
process because statistics frame government policies
and public response. If the data is skewed or faulty, the
decisions we make will be built on false premises.
In March 2020, legislation was passed
that allowed doctors to change how the
cause of death was reported on death
certificates. Rather than listing COVID-19
as a contributing cause in cases where
people died from other conditions, it was
listed as the primary cause.
I encourage you to do your own research on COVID-19
statistical manipulation, but the title of this peer-reviewed
research paper says it all:
COVID-19: CDC Violates Federal Law to
Enable Corruption of Fatality-Reporting Data
VIEW ARTICLE
RESEARCH PAPER BACKGROUND
The research team, led by Dr. Henry Ealy, ND, BCHN,
accumulated approximately 10,000 hours of collective
team research into this paper. It’s been reviewed by nine
attorneys and a judge for accuracy. It’s also gone through
the peer-review process before being published.
I will do my best to summarize its findings, but please go to
the original paper (link above) for a thorough understanding.
Summary
Special Rules For COVID-19 fatalities were implemented.
Importantly, in March 2020, a significant change was made
to the definition of what a COVID-19 fatality was.
As Dr. Henry Ealy (known as Dr. Henele) explained, there’s a
handbook on death reporting, which has been in use since
2003. There are two critical sections on a death certificate.
In the first part, the cause of death is detailed. In the second
part, contributing factors are listed.
Contributing factors are not necessarily statistically
recorded. The first part, the actual cause of death, is most
important for statistical accounting. On March 24, 2020,
the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) updated its
guidelines. Henele explains:
“What was really concerning about this
document was that it specifically stated
that any preexisting conditions should be
moved from Part 1, where it has been put
for 17 years, [and put] into Part 2.”
“So, it was creating new data reporting
rules exclusively for COVID-19. The big
problem with that,” Henele explains, is
that now you remove the ability for a
medical examiner, a coroner, a physician
to accurately interpret [the cause of death]
based upon the collective health history of
that patient.”
“You remove their expertise, and you say,
‘You have to count this as COVID-19.‘ That
takes on an added measure when you
incentivize it financially, and that’s what
we saw with some of the Medicare and
Medicaid payouts …”
As of August 23, 2020, the CDC reported 161,392 fatalities
caused by COVID-19. Had the long-standing, original
guidelines for death reporting been used, there would
have only been 9,684 total fatalities due to COVID-19.
That’s a difference of as much as 96%.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 22
 !
“An admission by the CDC in late August 2020 was that only 6% of the total death
count had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had
an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to
their deaths.”

COMPARISION OF TOTAL COVID-19 FATALITIES

BASED UPON DIFFERENT REPORTING GUIDELINES
THRU AUGUST 23RD DATA SOURCE TABLE 3

0.06%

4.7% US FATALITIES BY AGE

DATA SOURCES - EACH US HEALTH
22.3% DEPARTMENT THRU AUG 23RD (N=164,531)

161,392
Fatalities 0 to 19

72.9% Fatalities 20 to 49
Fatalities 50 to 69
TOTAL FATALITIES
Fatalities 70 +
USING GUIDELINES
PUBLISHED BY THE TOTAL FATALITIES
CDC ON MARCH USING CDC
24TH, 2020
EXCLUSIVELY FOR GUIDELINES IN USE
COVID-19 FOR 17 YEARS PRIOR
TO MARCH 24TH,
2020 FOR COVID-19
Note: The age 70+ demographic makes up the largest
9,684 percentage of fatalities (72.9%).

1.7%
9.2%
12.7% US CASES BY AGE US HOSPITALIZATIONS BY AGE
DATA SOURCES - EACH US HEALTH 9.2% DATA SOURCES - EACH US HEALTH
DEPARTMENT THRU AUG 23RD (N=5,365,759) DEPARTMENT THRU AUG 23RD (N=239,843)

43.3%
25.4% Cases 0 to 19 Hospitalizations 0 to 19
Cases 20 to 49 Hospitalizations 20 to 49
52.6% Cases 50 to 69 Hospitalizations 50 to 69
Cases 70 +
33.9% Hospitalizations 70 +

Note: Although the age 70+ demographic makes up a small Note: The age 70+ demographic makes up the largest
percentage of cases (12.7%), the age 70+ demographic makes up percentage of hospitalizations (43.3%) yet makes up a small
a disproportionate percentage of hospitalizations and fatalities. percentage of cases (12.7%).

This is alarmingly disproportionate to their relatively small
percentage of cases (12.7%) and thus defines them as a
high-risk population.
The opposite is true for the age 0 to 19 demographic, which
makes up a small percentage of fatalities (0.0554%)
What is the cost mentally, emotionally, financially,
and morally of continuing to follow this strategy of
lockdowns and experimental injections?
What benefits are gained by the government’s so-
called health organizations, technology giants and
pharmaceutical industry by pushing the vaccination
rollout?
Possible answers to some of those questions can be found
below, including links to more in-depth information.
VIEW DOCUMENT

Doesn’t it seem more logical to protect those who

are vulnerable or most at risk rather than enforcing
a treatment protocol that is already having
devastating effects?

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 23
 Informed Consent Versus Psychological Pressure

As we navigate the meaning, importance, and personal claim to

our biological, mental, and emotional sovereignty, we must also
consider the role of consent, especially what it means to give
informed consent.

All of the pressure applied in the direction of a global
vaccination is that of the mind and emotions. The perception
is that you must take this medical treatment to survive or
participate in society.
Informed consent is the process of talking and asking
questions until you have enough information to decide on
your healthcare options. This includes the option of saying
no to having a treatment (such as medicine) or a procedure
(such as a vaccination).
Have you ever wondered why governments would need to
market a Vaccine Lottery and incentive prizes if the vaccine
was unequivocally safe and effective?
VIEW ARTICLE
Both incentivization and strict limitations are employed
as psychological tactics to manipulate human behavior,
knowing that the fear of pain and the promise of pleasure
are inherent biological reactions.

According to the US Department of Health and Human Why do you think these coercive measures are all
Services (HHS), informed consent includes: being undertaken by governments worldwide?

“Promoting the voluntariness of the If the vaccination is so effective, why do they need
decision about whether or not to to resort to these measures?
participate in the research.” VIEW ARTICLE VIEW ARTICLE

You have a right under the law to make an informed choice

about your health care. You also have the right to say no to
a proposed treatment or procedure or change your mind
about wanting to go ahead with it.

Is it really to keep you safe, given a

99.71% survival rate for 20-49 year
olds and 99.29% for 50-69?

Or is it about something else?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 24
 WHAT MIGHT THAT SOMETHING ELSE BE?

• Do you think your health decisions • Do Governments have the authority to

should determine whether or not you can choose what is best for our bodies and
participate in society? health?

• If most of the world’s population is • What is the difference between

hesitant to take an experimental injection, discrimination based on skin color and
is it ethical to use coercive tactics, threats discrimination based upon biological and
and even mandates to persuade them? health status?

The imminent questions we all need to be
asking ourselves is this:
• Do governments, whose decisions are
heavily influenced by pharmaceutical and
technology industries, have the right to
mandate an injection that has not gone
through the usual pathway to market?
• Should Governments limit our freedoms
to work, socialize or travel based on our
health status?
• With a door being opened of vaccine
passports, where will centralized tracking
of our location and health status stop?
• If the vaccination does not stop catching
and transmitting the virus, why the
restrictions for the unvaccinated?
• Are we participating in the creation of
more polarizing issues to further weaken
our shared humanity?

By the World Health Organization’s own admission, those vaccinated

can still catch the virus and be a transmitter into the community.
READ MORE GO TO ARTiCLE

!
Moreover, following the money trail…

The Global Vaccines Market Size is projected to reach USD 104.87 billion by 2027,
exhibiting a CAGR of 10.7% during the forecast period [2020-2027]

READ MORE GO TO ARTICLE

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 25
 mRNA Technology and Vaccine Safety
To really understand our vaccine choices so that we can
make a truly informed consent, we need to look at what’s
available.
Currently, the Covid vaccinations are using a new-to-market
technology that was rushed into approval by the FDA for
use on humans because of the ‘deadly pandemic.’
Background of mRNA Technology
“mRNA technology is a synthetic genetic messenger that
provides a recipe to make a spike protein that the
SARs-COVID uses to enter the cells that stimulate the
production of antibodies.”
Instead of introducing an inactivated or weakened version
of a virus or piece of virus to the body, like previous
generations of vaccines, these vaccinations temporarily
turn the body’s cells into tiny spike protein-making factories.
The pharmaceutical industry is excited about this
technology because theoretically, mRNA could produce
any protein, enzyme, or growth agent. This would have
profound implications for many diseases if proven to be
safe and effective over the long term.
However, the operative words to consider here are ‘safe
and effective over the long term.’ We must deeply consider
the inherent implications of injecting an inorganic genetic
messenger with external instructions into the body.
TRADITIONAL VACCINES
Traditional vaccines work by introducing a small quantity
of inactive or attenuated viruses into the body to create
an immune response. This response activates the body’s
ability to make antibodies that can respond to the actual
virus in the future if encountered.
However, people can still contract a disease against which
they have previously been vaccinated.
Genetic manipulation has never been used in a vaccination.
So the experiment takes a two-pronged approach, with
Pfizer and Moderna using messenger-RNA (mRNA)
while AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson are using
adenoviral DNA.
Using the body’s natural immune system:
The same process happens naturally, whereby the body
makes antibodies to any foreign virus, bacteria, or other
potential toxins that enter the system.
So, given that our bodies are already equipped with an
immune system designed to protect us, why don’t we trust
it to do its job?
Suppose we are in a thoughtful relationship with our
bodies and provide them with proper nutrients, sufficient
rest, regular exercise, mental and emotional outlets and
spiritual practices. In that case, we are looking after the
vehicle of our Soul.
Proponents of mRNA technology believe a pre-
programmed, artificially created messenger system
is better equipped at organizing your immune system
response than your innate, God-given system.
Taking the vaccine is in silent agreement with that
assumption.
Therefore, the immune system your body came with isn’t
good enough and needs to be manipulated artificially.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 26
 Transcription and Translation
DNA is a blueprint or code of stored information. When that
information is converted into instructions to make a protein,
it’s called gene expression.
This tightly regulated process ensures the cells can respond
to an ever-changing environment. This also gives each cell
the ability to act as both an on/off switch, to control when
or how many proteins are made, and volume control, to
increase or decrease the number of proteins made.
The two primary steps involved in making a protein are
called transcription and translation.
Transcription is when the DNA inside a gene is copied to
produce an RNA transcript, called messenger RNA (mRNA).
This process uses bases from the cell’s nucleus to form
W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E
mRNA, making RNA and DNA chemically similar in structure
and properties.
Translation occurs after messenger RNA (mRNA) has taken
the instructions from the DNA over to the protein-making
factories in the cell, called ribosomes.
In the case of this new mRNA vaccine technology, what’s
happening is that rather than the DNA naturally producing
mRNA in response to a pathogenic invasion, synthetic
mRNA is being delivered directly into the system with its
own instructions on what kind of proteins to make.
In the case of these Covid-19 injections, the body is actually
being instructed to make spike proteins.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 27
 Spike Proteins
The synthetic mRNA forcibly opens the cell and tells it what
to do, which is not only to produce more spike proteins but
essentially turns the immune system against itself.
If you think of our DNA as a cookbook with instructions
for each cell on how to make proteins, then mRNA is like
a single recipe. Transcription is the process of copying the
recipe, while translation is a chef using the recipe to make
a dish.
When mRNA is translated into a functional protein, such as
antibodies, they respond to a virus or other toxins invading
the system.
However, rather than allowing the body to function
naturally by producing antibodies in response to a virus
(spike proteins), we inject the body with a request or
recipe to make spike proteins rather than antibodies to
spike proteins.
VIEW ARTICLE
However, when this process is initiated externally by
inserting a synthetic mRNA into the body, there are a lot of
questions that naturally arise.

QUESTONS TO CONSIDER:

• After the administration of the mRNA vaccine, how long will the body continue to make spike
proteins? Does this mechanism have an off switch?

• Does the transcription/translation process happen in reverse? Can the injected, synthetic mRNA
affect the building blocks of life, our genetic blueprint, the DNA?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 28
 QUESTION ONE:
How long will the body continue
to make spike proteins?
This first question is particularly important when considering switch this on again? Since we cut out key steps in getting
how problematic the spike proteins are on their own without this vaccine to market, we simply do not know any longer-
any virus attached. term implications of this new technologies deployment.

The research summarized below shows a direct link
between spike proteins and their harmful effects on the
vascular system, particularly blood vessels.
SARS-COV-2 SPIKE PROTEIN IMPAIRS
ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION VIA
DOWNREGULATION OF ACE 2
The researchers created a pseudovirus – a protein shell
with spike proteins but no viral RNA inside. Therefore these
pseudoviruses infect cells or replicate. The point was to
isolate the effects of the spike proteins on the body alone
as much as possible.
We know for certain that we see a much higher incidence
of vascular inflammation, as reported by the Center for
Disease (CDC) own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS).
So not only are spike proteins seemingly wreaking havoc
on the vascular system, the number of adverse events from
the injection is higher than any other vaccine in recorded
history.
Despite the alarming numbers of hospitalizations,
permanent injury and even death following the injection,
governments worldwide continue to support the rollout of
this experimental technology in the name of public safety.

They found:

SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome

coronavirus 2) infection relies on the binding of S protein
(Spike glycoprotein) to ACE (angiotensin-converting
enzyme) 2 in the host cells. Vascular endothelium can
be infected by SARS-CoV-2, which triggers mitochondrial
reactive oxygen species production and glycolytic shift.

Paradoxically, ACE2 is protective in the cardiovascular

system, and SARS-CoV-1 S protein promotes lung injury by
decreasing the level of ACE2 in the infected lungs.

In the current study, we show that S protein alone can

damage vascular endothelial cells (ECs) by downregulating
ACE2 and consequently inhibiting mitochondrial function.

VIEW ARTICLE

The injection triggers spike protein production, which has

been shown to create inflammation, a natural immune
response. This is problematic for those whose systems are
already under immune system stress.

There are unanswered questions about our inherent ‘off

switch’; when does the body turn off the ability to make
spike proteins? Are there any potential triggers that could

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 29
 QUESTION TWO:
Does the transcription/translation process happen
in reverse? Can the inserted synthetic mRNA start
to affect the actual DNA?
Proponents of mRNA technology state that because these
vaccines work outside the nucleus (in a space called the
cytoplasm), they don’t interact with the nucleus. The cell
breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it’s
finished reading the (recipe) instructions. Proponents also
insist the DNA itself is not affected.
However, because lipid nanotechnology is being used
in this injection, which is known to pass the blood-brain
barrier, perhaps the immune system isn’t picking up the
signs of an intruder. So how can we be certain some of
these spike proteins aren’t floating around, waiting for a
trigger response?
One topic of general consensus is that spike proteins are
not a welcome long-term guest, so how long they remain
in the body is of genuine concern. However, because this
vaccine technology is so new, no one truly knows the long-
term effects.
Even though experts assert that this process of DNA to
RNA to mRNA doesn’t work in reverse, there is something
called reverse transcriptase, which has been investigated
and is therefore possible.
VIEW ARTICLE
Although I can find numerous scientific studies to support
either side of this debate, my objective is really to present
questions for consideration that are perhaps outside the
standard narrative.
On a purely factual basis, this technology is so new we
have no studies of its long-term implications yet sufficient
evidence of its immediate harmful effects.
We also have a long history of vaccine safety standards that
require 5-10 years before public release, but this injection
has been approved without safety or efficacy trials in less
than two years.
This begs the question, what happened to the ethics of
our scientific community? Why are once reputable and
respected doctors threatened with losing their license for
speaking out against this vaccine based on their direct
patient experience?
Why is Nobel Prize-winning virologist Luc Montagnier being
criticized and shamed for voicing his concerns about the
origins of this virus and sharing information from his vast
knowledge on the subject of viruses?
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram
Bridle, Ph.D., is one such doctor who is receiving
widespread criticism from inside the medical community for
his outspoken concerns and public warnings.
Although a pro-vaccine doctor, he recently came out to say,
“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize
it until now… We thought the spike protein
was a great target antigen; we never knew
the spike protein itself was a toxin and was
a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating
people, we are inadvertently inoculating
them with a toxin.”
Bridle adds,
“What has been discovered by the
scientific community is that the spike
protein on its own is almost entirely
responsible for the damage to the
cardiovascular system if it gets into
circulation.”
Bridle says they thought the COVID injections would behave
like other vaccines, which remain mainly in the vaccination
site at the shoulder muscle. New evidence shows that the
vaccine and the protein that causes the production of spike
proteins get into the blood circulation. Bridle goes on to
detail why this is concerning.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 30
 “Once in circulation, the spike protein can
attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are
on blood platelets and the cells that line
blood vessels. When that happens, it can
cause platelets to clump, and that can
lead to clotting.”
A few data points can lead to this conclusion, both in
terms of scientific inquiry and research studies, and on the
consumer end through the VAERS reporting system, which
picks up early trends in vaccine deployment. (More on this
later.)
The following link is a press release by the Association of
American Physicians outlining their concerns about spike
protein production and blood clotting and vascular damage.
VIEW PRESS RELEASE
Here is a slide presentation by Dr. Bridle that explains
the damage being caused to the body by spike protein
production.
VIEW SLIDES
Medical Professionals
Meta-Data
Although I have chosen to highlight just two doctors
and their findings here, a growing number of medical
professionals are deeply concerned with the current
direction of the global vaccination program using
mRNA technology.
You can find more information and hear from other
doctors seeking Covid ethics in this link below.
DOCTORS FOR COVID ETHICS
W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E
This article from The Defender links to the various studies
referred to by Dr. Bridle. Here are those studies:
• A study published by the Clinical and Infectious
Diseases, which involved recipients of the Moderna
vaccine, shows that 11 out of the 13 study participants
had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein in their
plasma as early as one day after vaccination.
• A study published by Nature Neuroscience shows
that lab animals injected with purified spike protein
developed cardiovascular problems. The spike protein
also crossed the blood-brain barrier and caused
damage to the brain.
Dr. J. Patrick Whelan’s training from Harvard, Texas
Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine earned
him degrees in biochemistry, medicine, and rheumatology.
He spent 20 years as a pediatric rheumatologist.
When the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked Dr.
Whelan for comments on the vaccine, in preparation for a
meeting to review Pfizer/BioNTech’s request for emergency
use authorization in December 2020, Whelan cautioned
the agency by saying the vaccine has the “potential to
cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and
kidneys.”
VIEW LETTER
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 31
 Great Barrington Declaration
Around the world, thousands of physicians are gathering in online
forums to honor the Hippocratic Oath they swore to uphold during
their tenure as a doctor. That oath is to “First, do no harm.”
Another noteworthy group accumulating enormous traction consists of infectious disease epidemiologists and public health
scientists, with over 800,000 concerned global citizens. They are creating The Great Barrington Declaration.

VIEW SOURCE

TOTAL SIGNATURES CONCERNED CITIZENS MEDICAL & PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENTISTS MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS

864,303 805,155 14,981 44,167

THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION:

“As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have grave
concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing
COVID-19 policies and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.”

You can read the declaration by thousands of
independent experts in infectious diseases here:
VIEW ARTICLE
This is just one example of independent professional
medical experts sharing their knowledge and concerns
of the current direction of what appears to be a global
strategy to rush a new biological technology.
Their statement of Focused Protection seems a sensible
approach that honors the oath of not harming others.
“The most compassionate approach [one] that balances
the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity is to
allow those at minimal risk of death to live their lives
normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural
infection while better protecting those at high risk. We
call this Focused Protection.“
After reading this, how does your heart feel? Does this
seem like a reasonable and compassionate approach,
given the low risk of death due to the virus and the
statistics showing high rates of permanent harm or death
from the vaccination?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 32
 Scientific Ethics
Scientific ethics are an important part of drug development
in the pharmaceutical industry. They have boards and
advisory groups that lay out the parameters of bringing a
new drug to the market. Typically before Covid, it looked
like this:
Pre-clinical Trials: This is when the hypothesis is tested on
animals.
Phase 1: Relatively small trials, usually around 100
volunteers. The primary objective is to confirm the safety
on humans based on those results from animal studies.
Phase 2: Still focused on safety but now include 1000 to
2000 subjects.
Phase 3: Trials that typically include tens of thousands of
people. These are the pivotal final trials before a vaccine
is approved for widespread use.
While safety remains a focus, these trials are primarily
about showing that people who have received the
vaccine have significantly lower actual infection rates than
those who have not.
Phase 4: Once a vaccine is in widespread use, data
collection on its safety, as well as how well it is working,
continues to be collected.
SOURCE
W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E
Most countries have legally approved the current mRNA
vaccine due to the Medical Emergency Acts in the
respective territories. This allowed the vaccinations to
be fast-tracked and implemented at phase three before
widespread safety data were available.
Those who take the mRNA vaccination are basically
volunteering in phase three clinical trials, while those who
choose not to be vaccinated are the control group.
However, rather than allowing the unvaccinated to remain
the control group, governments claim it’s ‘unethical’ to
allow a control group to remain unvaccinated.
In your opinion, what is more unethical, enforcing mandatory
injections of an experimental new technology that doesn’t
prevent contraction or transmission of the virus or letting
people make their own health care decisions?
Without a control group or an unvaccinated percentage
of the population, we’ll have no data to compare the
effectiveness of this vaccine. Moreover, by ignoring
essential safety protocols, we set a new standard for future
fast-tracking pharmaceuticals without control groups or
standards of care.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 33
 Vaers Self Reporting
The FDA and CDC created the Vaccine Adverse Events
Reporting System (VARES) as a platform for public and
professional reporting of any adverse effects from vaccines.
The website is difficult to navigate, so electronic support
has been created, and yet still, fewer than 1% of adverse
events are reported.
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse
Event Reporting System (ESP: VAERS)
VIEW REPORT
!
A key quote from this finding:
“Adverse events from drugs
and vaccines are common but
underreported. Although 25% of
ambulatory patients experience an
adverse drug event, less than 0.3%
of all adverse drug events and 1–13%
of serious events are reported to the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine
adverse events are reported.”
Pre-Covid, VAERS issued a black box warning if a vaccine
was suspected to be the cause of death. Likewise, drugs
were pulled off the market after as few as 50 deaths.
However, even though VAERS has had more reported
vaccine-related deaths in the last two years than in the
previous 20 years (that’s with all other vaccines combined),
the Covid vaccine continues not only to be recommended
but enforced.
Although the VAERS only flagged a pattern and did not
suggest any causation, it’s worth investigating.
At the time of my latest search on September 21, 2021,
there were 6756 deaths on the VAERS system attributed
to COVID vaccinations. If that number is typical of the 1%
of reporting, we can conclude that the actual number is
significantly higher, at 675,600 in the US alone!
You can see the most recent numbers on the link below by
going to ‘Search VAERS DATA,’ then click ‘I have read the
disclaimer’ on the menu-driven tool, then type COVID into
the box. Scroll down and click ‘I agree,’ then click ‘Search
VAERS DATA.’
If you click ‘group results by vaccine’ on the drop-down
menu and by ‘VAERS ID,’ before scrolling down to select
‘Other event characteristics’ and choose ‘Death,’ then hit
‘Send,’ and you will get the latest data on deaths from this
vaccination.
GO TO VAERS.HHS.GOV
A summary below shows you the numbers, but just to clarify,
for all 70 previously available vaccines, there are typically
around 16,000 total safety reports each year. However, for
the COVID vaccine alone, there are already over 358,379
verified safety reports from the CDC, with over 20,000
hospitalizations, including 100,000 urgent care emergency
room visits.
These numbers certainly indicate a strong pattern of
concerning data, yet this is not the information most of us
are receiving. Why?
Dr. Jessica Rose analyzed the VAERS numbers for the past
decade in an easy-to-read chart below. These show the
tremendous increase in both vaccine-related reports and
deaths since the COVID vaccine rollout.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 34
 TOTAL VAERS COUNTS AND DEATH COUNTS FOR THE PAST DECADE

She also identified massive increases in CV and neurological issues seeking treatment from
Accident and Emergency (AE) services.

CARDIOVASCULAR, NEUROLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL AEs ARE

ALL BEING REPORTED AT RATES NOT SEEN BEFORE...

CARDIOVASCULAR, NEUROLOGICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL AE REPORTS ARE EXPLODING*

The rates of AEs are also increasing

for Cardiovascular, Neurological and
Immunological Categories

Dr. Rose’s research also shows that approximately

50% of deaths occur within 48 hours of receiving the
injection, while 80% occur within a week.

Here is a slide presentation of Dr. Rose’s research,

which may help you decide.

VIEW SLIDES

*As of August 27th, 2021

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 35
 Other Treatment Approaches
Returning to our Sociological Imagination lens and viewing
this situation from a broader perspective, you may wonder
why only one solution is being considered?
Given the CDC’s statistical data that shows the fatality rate
due to COVID infection is less than 1% for everyone under
65 years, why aren’t people encouraged to boost their
immune system rather than weaken it?
Lockdowns, isolation, social distancing, stress from
financial uncertainty and fear are all extremely harmful
to the human organism. Many documented reports
show increased anxiety, depression, suicide, domestic
violence, child abuse, and death from preventable, early
treatment diseases, such as diabetes, certain cancers, and
cardiovascular abnormalities.
Although governments and the media aren’t widely
promoting immune therapies to fortify the body, many case
studies show favorable results using supplements such as
Selenium, which helps curb viral replication. Essential fats,
such as omega-3 EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA
(docosahexaenoic acid), Vitamins C and D, and Zinc are
also part of the protocol.
Additionally, doctors on the front lines around the world
were obtaining good results using anti-inflammatory drugs
like Hydroxychloroquine, Corticosteroids and Colchicine,
as well as antiviral Ivermectin. However, their attempts to
share their successful treatments were met with criticism,
hostility and even threats of medical license revocation.
Time and again, doctors with a conscience, who still believe
in upholding their Hippocratic Oath, were ostracized or
de-platformed after sharing their findings on social media
platforms.
Perhaps equally alarming was the advice Covid patients
were being given early on, which was to ‘do nothing’ until
symptoms worsened. Once hospitalized, many of these
patients were put on ventilators, which actually worsened
their condition. Reports from China and the UK in March
of 2020 showed a 90% mortality rate among ventilated
patients.
If the information provided in this
document raises more questions
than answers, I can recommend
a book by Dr. Peter Breggin
entitled COVID-19 and the Global
Predators - We are the Prey.
Doctor Breggin includes over
2,000 references to support his
data and succinctly puts the pieces
of this alarming puzzle together.
Once you have a complete picture of this global event, we
can move on to the next quadrant in our system of analysis.
Until then, here are a few other big-picture questions you
may want to contemplate.
S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 36
 Key Covid
Global Response • Why were big brand food chain stores allowed
to stay open while small family-run stores had to
Questions close?

• Why do you have to wear a mask on a plane at

HERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS all times, unless you are eating or drinking? Or in
a restaurant, while walking to your table, but not
ABOUT THE GLOBAL once seated? Is the virus not present when your
RESPONSE TO COVID YOU mouth is open?
MAY NOT HAVE CONSIDERED.
• If we are amid a deadly pandemic, why were
the Olympics allowed to continue and athletes
allowed travel exemptions while families were
prevented from personally comforting a dying
relative?

• Why would some doctors, scientists, and

professors risk their careers, reputations and
livelihoods to voice concerns over what they are
experiencing and witnessing in their areas of
expertise? And more importantly, why are they
being de-platformed by social media giants for
exercising their right to free speech?

• Why are vaccines required if they don’t prevent

infection or transmission of the virus?

• Why are vaccine passports required to travel if the

vaccine doesn’t protect us or others?

• Why are those who make a different health

decision being publically discriminated against?

• Why are our personal health decisions now on

public display?

• Why is coercion necessary for compliance?

• Why not isolate and protect the small minority of

vulnerable citizens rather than increase physical,
social, mental, emotional vulnerability?

• What are the consequences of an unfortunate

global vaccine experiment?

• According to expert virologists, why are we being

vaccinated during a pandemic when this is what
causes variants?

• What happens to an immune system that

undergoes multiple injections and never exercises
its own natural response?

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 37
 Analyze:
Broad Internal Attentional Style
EXTERNAL ALIGN YOUR COMPASS AND TUNE INTO
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
Assess Action
• What is greater, the real risk or the perceived risk?
BROAD NARROW • How safe does mRNA technology feel?
• Why are pharmaceutical companies immune from
Analyse Attune lawsuits and liabilities?
• Do you trust the information from the mainstream
INTERNAL
media?
• Are you prepared to face ridicule, disappointment,
to stand in your sovereignty even if it goes against
Our journey through the ASSESS phase of Attentional Styles
authority?
was a big one, but now that you have this information, you
can start to make a plan for the future. • Do you believe your immune system is faulty and
needs technological interventions to work correctly?
The ANALYZE phase is where you will begin thinking about • What’s more harmful, the virus or the consequences of
your sovereignty and independence and how to develop lockdowns and mandates?
an overarching strategy for you and your family, based on • What are your ideological beliefs for or against:
all the information we’ve covered thus far. » Socialism
» Totalitarianism
In ANALYZE, we go broad and internal, which means you » Technological data harvesting and tracking
now take what you’ve learned and apply it to your value
• What are your beliefs and values around:
compass, your instrument of truth and personal true north.
» Freedom of Speech
» Biological Sovereignty
Perhaps the actual questions you need to ponder aren’t
» Medical Discrimination
about the vaccination or the virus, but rather the global
» Privacy
response and the loss of your civil liberties.
» Civil Liberties
» Informed consent
Where do you stand on the inalienable rights of free
» Censorship
speech, freedom of movement, freedom of biological
choice? Unless you know where you stand now, you may
find yourself wondering when you fell down or when you
inadvertently gave away those things that are actually the
most precious.
“Your freedom can’t be taken
away - you must give it away.”

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 38
 Attune:
Narrow Internal Attentional Style
EXTERNAL This is called Attuning and it lays the foundation so you can
make some bold declarations.

Assess Action
MY VALUES ARE GROUNDED IN THE
BROAD NARROW FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES:

Analyse Attune • Health Values

• Vaccine Values
• Freedom and Sovereignty Values
INTERNAL

No one can give you a road map In these challenging times

The questions above were designed to ‘stress test’ your
because the terrain is changing so quickly. However, what
values. Now that you know where you stand, you can align
you do have are your unwavering values as a compass
yourself with your highest values and behave according to
through the storm.
those values.

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 39
 Action:
Narrow External Attentional Style
This is where you put together your action plan of how you will
respond given specific parameters.
EXTERNAL

Assess Action

BROAD NARROW

Analyse Attune

INTERNAL

HERE ARE SOME EXCELLENT SCENARIOS AND

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER TO PREPARE YOUR
RESPONSE ACCORDING TO YOUR VALUES.

• What will I do if I have to get the vaccination to travel?

• What will I do if my employer makes the vaccination

mandatory?

• What am I prepared to do to protect my right to freedom?

• What am I prepared to do to protect my sovereignty?

• Where is my line in the sand?

• How am I prepared to stand up to invasive authority?

• What actions am I prepared to take to secure my biological

sovereignty for my family and me?

• Would I get vaccinated if the loss of my civil liberties were

not being threatened?

• How will I respond if officials come knocking on my door?

• Do I know my legal rights?

S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 40
 Closing Thoughts
Once you’ve answered these questions, they will help you establish your position.
You will feel more grounded and confident in an unwavering alignment with your
values and truth.

Your values and truth will be your guide, the compass that keeps you steady in
the storm. This storm will pass. While on this journey, however, don’t lose sight of
the destination.

This is a journey of awakening - for the planet and humanity. You are here now,
on Earth and part of this community, because you are ready to be a new leader.
The captain of a ship destined for the light, the light of freedom and sovereignty,
which is our birthright.

Remember, you have free will; you always have a choice. Just as you exercise
your right to choose, grant others that same right without judgment. You are only
responsible for your Soul journey and truth. Everything else is just an invitation.

Continue to research widely with an open mind. Find all options and avenues
available to you that protect and uphold your inalienable rights to freedom and
sovereignty. Your heart will resonate with the truth when you find it.

This manifesto is an attempt to help you feel empowered. Be prepared, and know
that alternatives to the mRNA vaccine are coming soon. The Novavax Covid
vaccine uses traditional vaccine technology and appears biologically safer for
the body. This is an option that will reopen our freedom to travel if the vaccine
passports become mandatory.

Be vigilant in your quest for unbiased information. Be cautious of news that comes
from mainstream media channels. Stay alert for any attempt to take you off course;
that takes you away from your values or violates your God-given rights to freedom
in all its forms.

Trust your knowing heart and stay true to your path.

With all my love,

W W W.C H R I S TO F.LOV E S OV E R E I G N T Y M A N I F E S TO | 41