University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines

Department of Architecture
415: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE 3
Group 10 (Abonitalla, Eduave, Saluta, Tabamo)

GROUP 10: ACTIVITY

PENDING LAWS RELATING TO ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT

Name: Hynah Marie N. Caseres

Section: 4A

1. As an Architecture student, do you think the motives of HB 10234 promotes the prestige of
being an Architect or does it just undermine our course?

HB 10234 is a major legislative proposal that architecture students debate for its impact on
the profession's reputation. Investigation of its motives uncovers a complex story involving
legislation, norms, and architect value.

The bill's main goal in regulating architecture is to set standards for professionalism,
expertise, and licensure. This goal seems to connect with elevating the profession's prestige
by ensuring only qualified architects work. High standards may boost confidence in
architects, who are uniquely qualified to ensure the built environment's safety,
functionality, and aesthetics.

However, opinions on the bill's effects differ. Some say severe constraints limit architectural
innovation's creative freedom. Limiting creativity or restricting unique techniques could
dampen the course's vitality and adaptability.

As architecture students, we must analyze these benefits in order to understand how the
bill may affect our careers. Dialogues beyond support or opposition are possible. Instead, it
encourages constructive criticism and discussion.

HB 10234's complexity requires a thorough comprehension of its balance potential. A

delicate balance between professional standards and artistic expression is needed.
Accepting regulation change as part of the profession's progress empowers students to
actively shape the field.

The bill's goals may boost architects' prestige through strict standards but hinder
innovation and creative freedom. These conversations prepare young architects for future
challenges, creating a resilient and dynamic architectural world.

2. Would you agree of the changes to be made on HB 10234 such as; increasing the passing
average grade and decreasing the chances of taking the board exam?

The suggested modifications to HB 10234, particularly raising the passing grade average
and reducing board exam frequency, demand a reevaluation of architecture regulation.
Students and professionals argue over such changes, which aim to improve standards and
streamline the exam procedure.
 University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines
Department of Architecture
415: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE 3
Group 10 (Abonitalla, Eduave, Saluta, Tabamo)

Raising the passing average grade may improve architect quality. Advocates say this might
boost the profession's prestige by setting a higher standard for competence and
knowledge. A higher passing score may indicate a deeper understanding of architectural
concepts and a more skilled workforce.

This change raises worries about its effects. It may unintentionally hinder some prospective
architects, particularly those who thrive in practical applications but suffer with
standardized tests. This could limit diversity in the area, hindering intelligent people who
may have unique viewpoints but not fulfill high academic standards.

Reducing board test frequency may also simplify the process and give candidates more
time to prepare. Advocates say this might improve architectural practice by attracting
better-prepared experts.

However, fewer exams may put candidates under strain because failing them could
postpone or change career paths. It could also make it harder to fix mistakes or assess
readiness between examinations, compromising licensure fairness and inclusion.

These proposed changes must be discussed by students. Understanding the pros and cons
of these changes empowers us to shape our profession's future. In assessing these
proposed HB 10234 changes, balancing high standards with field accessibility for varied
talent is crucial.