Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teemu Palosaari
Tampere Peace Research Institute TAPRI, University of Tampere, Finland
Abstract: The article uncovers factors that point towards continuing peaceful develop-
ment in the Arctic. Contrast to the grim visions of an Arctic Race to the resources, there
is a process where international law, UN conventions, environmental regimes and sci-
entiic guidelines are followed. Consequently, the main security challenges in the Arctic
are not related to traditional interstate security questions. Instead of issues like maritime
delimitation or cold water military capacities we should be more concerned about human
and environmental security. To this end, the article analyses the local dilemma between
traditional means of livelihood and modern hydrocarbon industry, global environmental
impacts of glacier melting, and moral issues related to the utilization of the new Arctic
oil and gas resources (the so-called Arctic paradox).
13
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
no “Wild North”, let alone new Cold War – A complex scientiic debate is ongoing
but rather a process where international law, on the impacts of climate change on the
UN conventions, environmental regimes Arctic ice melting. For the purposes of this
and scientific guidelines are followed. article the following mainstream indings are
Thus, what is amazing about the “Race” found suficient: the average temperature in
is that there actually are clear rules, which the region has risen and rises faster than in
are followed, and that peaceful change and any other area in the globe2 and the ice cap
territorial claims in resource-rich areas is shrinking3. The environmental impacts of
coexist. climate change are naturally more diverse
Furthermore, it is argued here that the and concern flora and fauna as well as
traditional, state-centred hard security traditional means of livelihood (see e.g.
concerns draw attention away from the ACIA 2004, 2005), but the sea-ice retreat
actual Arctic security problems, which relate alone has effects on international politics
to environmental and human security. Thus, – on which this article focuses.
the second key argument of the article is that The article is structured so that in order
the main security challenges in the Arctic are to provide background and context for
not related to traditional interstate security the analysis, a brief comparison of the
questions. Instead of issues like maritime 1990s and the current situation in the
delimitation or cold water military capacities Arctic is presented irst. That is followed
we should be more concerned about a) by an analysis of two main International
the local level: for instance the dilemma Relations interpretations of the Arctic (state
between traditional means of livelihood sovereignty and international governance
and modern hydrocarbon industry b) global perspectives). It is explained how both
environmental impacts of glacier melting, perspectives support the conclusion that
and c) moral issues related to the utilization peaceful change is likely to continue in the
of the new Arctic oil and gas resources (the Arctic. Final part of the article discusses
so-called Arctic paradox). topical environmental and human security
Concepts originating from Peace issues in the Arctic and explains how
Research are applied here on the Arctic case solving these problems could contribute
to give a general framework for analysis.1 A to the strengthening of positive peace in
purpose of the article is to point out that the area.
deeper transformation from negative peace
(absence of war/violence) into positive
peace (integration, cooperation) in the
Arctic still calls for solving dilemmas that
concern environmental and human security.
Although the Arctic is best described as a
case of continuing peaceful change, there
is no lack of environmental and human
security problems.
14
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
The comeback of the Arctic: international action in the Arctic during the
a comparison of 1990s and 1990s. The states utilized environmental is-
the current Arctic wave sues as “soft”, non-ideological, almost non-
political themes with which to start coop-
The irst Arctic wave: eration. The cooperation then materialised
post-Cold War euphoria as various initiatives and organizations in
the region: AEPS, Arctic Council, Barents
During the Cold War the Arctic region was Euroarctic Council, International Arctic
central from the military perspective, but Science Committee IASC, Arctic Military
otherwise marginal and peripheral (Pal- Environmental Cooperation AMEC, etc.
osaari & Möller 2004). The Arctic sea and The resulting international cooperation
land areas played an important role in the in environmental issues, culture, science,
strategies of the superpowers US and So- tourism and other soft themes played a
viet Union (Jalonen 1992, Heininen 1992). noteworthy role in the process where solu-
The international cooperation in the Arctic tions were sought for in order to mitigate
gained momentum in the early 1990s – in the Cold War tensions (see Åtland 2008).
fact, cooperation had started to evolve even At the same time the founding of various
before the end of the Cold War. Coopera- regional and subregional organizations,
tion started with environmental issues, they international treaties and other institutions
were perceived as “low politics” that were meant that new non-state international ac-
easier to cope with in the antagonist atmos- tors were introduced to the Arctic arena.
phere. The speech by Mikhail Gorbachev At irst this took place in terms that were
in Murmansk 1987 is often presented as a deined and controlled by the states, but the
milestone in a process that increased the regionalisation process eventually resulted
international interest towards the Arctic in broader political agenda and the forms
and eventually led to the establishment of of international cooperation in the North.
various international cooperation bodies. In the 1990s desecuritization and
The so-called Rovaniemi Process and Arctic disarmament took place and the military
Environmental Protection Strategy were importance of the Arctic declined to some
among the irst forms of international co- degree (Palosaari & Möller 2004). The
operation between the Cold War parties in Arctic cooperation agenda was increasingly
the Arctic. The Ottawa Declaration of 1996 deined by environmental security instead
established the Arctic Council as a intergov- of military security. In addition to the
ernmental forum to provide a means for actual concerns on the vulnerable Arctic
promoting cooperation, coordination and environment this was influenced by the
interaction in issues of sustainable develop- fact that technological advances in ice
ment and environmental protection. The breaking and underwater drilling enabled
Arctic Indigenous peoples’ organizations new multinational oil companies’ activities
were also involved in the Council’s work. in the region – which in turn called for
The way how the Arctic Council was international cooperation, economical and
launched describes tellingly the logic of scientiic (Archer 1992).
15
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
16
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
agenda to the political agenda. The impacts fuel and transit fees. Concerning natural
of the climate change are now more visible resources it can be noted irstly that ishing
and better documented. The securitisation leets are moving North as seas become
process related to climate change seems warmer and more navigable. Secondly,
like a textbook example of a securitisation new oil and gas resources available: Arctic
move in the environmental security sector: contains a substantial portion of the world’s
the public awareness of issues in the oil and gas reserves – the Shtokman gas
scientiic agenda increases and issues on field in the Barents Sea alone holds 113
the scientiic agenda become recognized trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves
by policymakers. This is followed by the (which equals about twice the known gas
acceptance of political responsibility and reserves of Canada) (Offerdal 2007, 139).
arising political management questions What is typical to the second Arctic wave is
concerning “international cooperation and that there is a growing interest towards the
institutionalization, the effectiveness of region from outside of it. Non-arctic actors
unilateral national initiatives, distribution such as China, India, Japan and Philippines
of costs and beneits, free-rider dilemmas, ind the region interesting particularly from
problems of enforcement, and so forth”. the viewpoint of isheries and transport.
Clearly, the presumed urgency of climate
change has become a political issue (cf.
Buzan et al. 1999, 72). Two basic interpretations of
Another significant change has been the current situation on the
that the Arctic has become exposed to Arctic
globalisation. New ways have emerged
in which the Arctic is becoming more The Arctic political puzzle contains a
integrated part of the global economy. variety of political actors: in addition
Arctic has, actually, for long been global to the Arctic states there are a number
in the sense that there has been Northern of active intergovernmental, regional,
fishing g rounds, whaling, fur trade, indigenous, environmental, scientific
mining which connected the Arctic to and non-governmental organizations. In
markets around the world (Heininen & the academic debate there appears to be
Southcott 2010, 1). But the new forces of two major, and somewhat competing,
globalization are boosted by the climate interpretations as regards to the near future
change. Obviously there is growing interest Arctic international politics. The irst of
towards the Arctic sea routes and natural them underlines the role of states and
resources that become available as the sovereignty and the relationship between
sea-ice melts. The numbers are telling: the eight Arctic states; whereas the second
the transport route Tokyo-Amsterdam via highlights international governance and
Panama is 23 000 km and via Suez 21 000 cooperation, UN Convention on the Law
km, but via Northwest Passage 15 500 km of the Sea (UNCLOS) and environmental
and via North-East 13 500 km. This means regimes. The former can be called state
significant savings in time (10-15 days), sovereignty perspective and the latter
17
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
18
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
include the “depletion of oil and gas in the Arctic Ocean. US National Security
more southerly ields of Arctic oil- and gas- Presidential Directive on Arctic Region
producing countries, continuing unstable Policy also contradicted Russia’s claim to
political developments in producing regions bigger portion of the Arctic (9.1.2009,
elsewhere, the need for greater security in Reuters 12.1.2009). Denmark called upon a
energy supplies, high oil and gas prices, meeting of the ive Arctic coastal states to
better technology and renewed interest in discuss i.a. ways in which territorial claims
the Arctic as an energy region on the part on the sea bed can be agreed on in line with
of political as well as industrial actors” the current law of the sea. This resulted in
(Offerdal 2007, 139). Lee finds that the the Ilulissat Declaration.
Arctic together with the Antarctic forms Canada has announced funding for new
a “Polar Tension Belt”, that is to say an Arctic patrol vessels, deep-water port and
area with the most climate change which cold weather training center (Arctic Council
thus “will have the potential for the most News Service, 16 July 2008, 5 March 2008).
dramatic swings in conlict likelihood” (Lee Canada inds that the Northwest Passage
2009, 11). is part of its internal waters, rather than
From the viewpoint of traditional an international strait open to vessels from
security politics the key actors in the region every country without constraint (as for
are the Arctic states: Canada, US, Denmark, instance US considers it). So far Canada has
Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland and not turned away vessels from the Passage,
Russia. Additionally, NATO and EU have even if they had not sought for Canada’s
to some extent enhanced their Arctic consent for the voyage. Up until now the
profiles (de Hoop Scheffer 2009, CNN. Northwest Passage has not been navigable
com 29.1.2009, European Commission twelve months a year, but that is likely to
2008). In addition to China and Japan change in the coming years. The Canadian
there are other Asian states that have domestic debate has touched upon Canada’s
shown interest towards the Arctic. South- ability to prevent unauthorized crossings
Korea, for instance, participates in the by foreign vessels, maritime surveillance,
activities of the Arctic Council as an ad and the related alleged “silent” threat to
hoc-observer. The current Russian security Canadian sovereignty (Byers 2009). Also
strategy emphasizes the significance of the dispute between Canada and Denmark
the Arctic. Some Russian activities have on the ownership of the tiny Hans Island
lately aimed at showing global military stretch has played a role on the Canadian politics.
in the Arctic: strategic bombers ly over The Northwest Passage is seen to have
the Arctic, Northern Fleet naval ships and noteworthy strategic signiicance to Canada
submarines conduct patrols in the Arctic, and there has been concern on US, Russian,
and military capabilities in the Arctic are British and French submarines operating
increased (BaretsObserver 13.2.2009, in the area.6
4.10.2010). US, Canada, Denmark and It has been argued that in the 21st century
Norway have responded for instance regionalism has been replaced by more
by participating in military exercises in “statist” and “modern” international
19
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
politics in the North. Borders are no environmental security threats are global
longer fuzzy but more securitized and and cannot be tackled with military policy or
divisive again. Military capacity, internal traditional security politics of single states.
and homeland security and territoriality Consequently it is seen that international
have found their way into the discourse institutions and regimes play an important
(Browning 2005). A silent remilitarization role in the Arctic. The sovereignty of
has perhaps started in the Arctic (Palosaari states turns out to be relative: the actions
& Möller 2004). Indeed, already in the of states are delimited by the norms of
early 1990s Jalonen pointed out that “it international law. In this interpretation the
would be premature to conclude that the regionalisation that started in the 1990s has
assumptions of traditional naval thought been complemented with mechanisms of
will be discarded now that the Cold War Arctic governance. The existing international
is over. Naval thought is not a product law contains extensive rules on the utilization
of the East-West conlict but a far more of the sea areas which concern both
fundamental expression of the economic, military and commercial vessels navigation
military, and geographical foundations rights as well as the rights of coastal states.
of the foreign policies of the western There are also established rules in place
maritime powers. Therefore, he argued, it for solving cases of overlapping maritime
is reasonable to expect that especially in claims. These mechanisms also tend to
the case of the United States the navy’s reinforce themselves in the course of time:
capability for overseas deployments will as the increasing number of territorial
be maintained (Jalonen 1992, 12). In this claims are handled via the UNCLOS, the
light the current showcasing of military prestige of international law in maritime
stretch and lag waving in the Arctic is not issues increases.
a new issue caused by the climate change, Furthermore, the environmental protection
but rather a phenomenon that has longer of the seas deines national and international
historical roots. rules actions against pollution. For instance the
International Maritime Organization (IMO)
has developed security instructions for ships
2. Arctic governance and cooperation operating in the Arctic ice-covered waters.
There are also treaties that limit pollution from
In addition to the national interest and ships and ocean dumping. The Arctic Council
state-oriented perspective, the current has produced Arctic offshore oil and gas
Arctic development is often be perceived guidelines (Arctic Council 2009). Despite the
from a viewpoint that highlights the global, sea ice retreat UNCLOS continues to apply
transborder nature of threats that relate to in the Arctic and regulates and manages
ice melt and the role of international law coastal states claims in the Arctic Sea. In
in solving disputes. In this perception it the light of this the planting of the Russian
is a question of a broader security threat flag under the North Pole, for instance,
that goes beyond the threats on territorial carries no legal signiicance. (Corell 2008,
integrity or sovereignty of the states. The Gahr Støre 2008, Arctic Council News
20
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
21
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
”new Cold War” in the Arctic. There is wide security agenda, and crossborder
no ideological antagonism, and the Arctic cooperation have gained a recognized
is far from being a military theatre similar role in the Arctic politics. Consequently,
to the 1970s and 1980s – when it served the mechanisms of Arctic governance are
as a main military theatre in the arms race already in place. From the viewpoint of
between US and Soviet Union. The strategic international governance, polar ice melt and
situation that unfolded there after the late other environmental impacts of the climate
1960s provided a ”good example of a change can be perceived as a common,
classic security dilemma” (Jalonen 1992, global threat which calls for cooperation
6). Military expansion started in the 1970s between all Arctic actors. Thus, rather than
when the Soviet Union and US appeared in causing tensions between the states, climate
the Northern seas to maintain ”the global change can give a boost to international
balance of power” (Käkönen 1992, 67). cooperation and further strengthen the
In the 1980s the strategic development institutions of multilevel Arctic governance.
(Soviet Northern Fleet, US Naval strategy, This also challenges the narrow views on
submarines, missiles) further increased the national sovereignty, interest and presents
strategic importance of the Arctic (Archer a broader view on security. The global
1992, 100). attention on the melting of the North Pole
In such historical perspective it becomes and Greenland’s glaciers will also bring the
clear that the 1990s witnessed a change Arctic issues into the international agenda
from confrontation to cooperation. Stability defined as environmental and human
and peaceful institutionalized cooperation security issues, rather than as traditional
was achieved, and continues to be valued national security issues.
by all the key actors in the region. The Summing up, it can be stated that
value of international law is also widely although often reported otherwise, the
acknowledged, as manifested, for instance, scramble for the Arctic’s minerals is unlikely
by the Ilulissat Declaration: “the law of to lead to conflicts that would threaten
the sea provides for important rights and the peaceful development in the region
obligations concerning the delineation of (Table 1). Moreover, it is dificult to see any
the outer limits of the continental shelf, concrete evidence of an ”emerging Polar
the protection of the marine environment, Tension Belt”, as suggested by Lee (2009),
including ice-covered areas, freedom of where ”populations will move on large
navigation, marine scientiic research, and scale” and ”arms race in terms of Cold
other uses of the sea. We remain committed Water military capabilities” will take place
to this legal framework and to the orderly (Lee 2009, 119-122).
settlement of any possible overlapping Consequently, it can be asked where does
claims.” (Ilulissat Declaration 2008; US, the biased conlict-centred Arctic vision
Russia, Denmark, Norway, Canada.) then stem from? The Arctic resources and
Since the 1990s various international seabed mapping have been in the headlines
and regional organizations have emerged in and repeatedly in a way that highlights the
the Arctic region. Environmental regimes, perceived conlict potential.7 A reason for
22
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30
Table 1. Two interpretations of the current situation in the Arctic and the elements supporting peaceful development.
Teemu Palosaari
follow the rules.
23
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
this biased media hype can be located in the Environmental and human security
ongoing securitization process concerning
the climate change. Climate change is In the above-presented analysis it was shown
becoming an increasingly weighty topic in that from the viewpoint of negative peace
international security politics. According to the conclusion is that world peace is not
the logic of securitization this means that threatened by Arctic issues, and that there is
climate change is constructed as an issue no real potential for military conlict in the
that is beyond normal politics, a question area currently. The Arctic is characterized
that calls for exceptional measures. When by absence of direct violence and there is
the related securitisation move is successful, very low likelihood that such would occur.
climate change is socially constructed However, from the perspective of positive
as a global emergency that threatens the peace the picture is more complex. The
whole biosphere and humankind. As a remaining of the article is motivated by the
by-product of this process, when Arctic question: Is there “indirect” or “structural”
issues are discussed in the context of global violence in the Arctic?8 It is argued that
climate change it is the conlict scenarios, the key security challenges in the Arctic
rather than the continuation of peaceful are related to environmental security, and
development, that get highlighted. that in addition to the vulnerability of the
Secondly, what also might explain the Arctic nature more wide-ranging issues are
attraction of Arctic conlict scenarios are at stake.
the romantic historical visions that concern
the polar expeditions in North and South.
The heroic and patriotic races to conquer The Arctic paradox
the white spots on the map (such as the
epic race Amundsen vs. Scott), naming The faster we use fossil fuels, the sooner
new geographical areas in the honor of we get access to new oil and gas resources.
the motherland and struggles against the This is the Arctic paradox: hydrocarbon use
forces of nature still resonate with the contributes to the climate warming, which
public consciousness when it comes to the makes the Arctic sea-ice melt and new oil
Arctic. Similarly, the history of the Cold and gas resources become available. Using
War has left a persistent mark on how Arctic those resources then further accelerates
affairs are perceived in the media: far too climate warming.
often the situation is understood simply So far this paradox has not had signiicant
as a rivalry between US and Russia, West impact on the national Arctic strategies
and East over the control of the Arctic. of the Arctic states, despite the global
As a result the complexity of the Arctic climate debate surrounding the UN climate
case is oversimpliied and seen merely as a talks. The moral dilemma regarding the
question of military security. Arctic energy resources has not really
yet been grasped by the state sovereignty
perspective or international governance
viewpoint. Nevertheless, the first calls
24
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
25
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
Council and other Arctic environmental in the Arctic environmental thinking and
actors. Issues like persistent organic cooperation. Also the local level dilemma
contaminants, heavy metals, radiation, between traditional livelihood and modern
military waste, acidiication, biodiversity hydrocarbon industry, and even the above-
conservation, sources and pathways of mentioned moral issues, should ind their
pollutants, their impact on lora and fauna, way to the established Arctic cooperation
long range pollution, protection of marine agenda, both in the form of interstate
environment, etc. have become integrated cooperation and international governance.
in the well-established Arctic international This would further strengthen the peaceful
cooperation. Lately the risks related to development towards more positive peace
growing oil and gas transportation and in the Arctic.
extraction have also steadily made their
way to the international awareness and
to the agenda of Arctic governance and End notes
cooperation. As the Emergency Prevention,
1
Preparedness and Response working Peace Research is seen here as ”an intel-
group of the Arctic Council (EPPR) states lectual enterprise devoted to answering
the “harsh conditions and the lack of a simple – or is it a complex – question:
infrastructure in much of the Arctic create what are the causes of war and conlict and
a higher vulnerability to emergencies than what are the conditions of peace?” (Dunn
in more temperate climates.”11 The recent 2005, 7).
oil accident in the Gulf of Mexico has
2
caused discussion on the risks of “BPing” In 2000-2007 the spring temperature
the Arctic. The cleanup work in the Arctic has been on the average 4 degrees higher
conditions would be extremely difficult: than between 1970-1999 (US National
“Industry representatives acknowledge Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
that they still have no effective way to clean NOAA).
up oil under ice. (…) Recent experiments
3
conducted by a coalition of oil companies In September 2007 the amount of ice
fall far short of the needed proof that was 50% smaller than in the 1950s and
oil spills can be contained in arctic ice.” 1970s (National Snow and Ice data Center,
(Norlen & Gordon, The Circle No.1 2010) University of Colorado 2008). According
Moreover, the environmental impact of to NASA the permanent ice cap around
the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska still the North Pole has thinned 40% between
continues.12 2004 and 2008 (NASA 2009). The satellite
What this conventional view on Arctic pictures too indicate a signiicant change
environment has so far largely missed, (see e.g. NASA Earth Observatory, http://
however, are the global dimensions of earthobservatory.nasa.gov).
Arctic environmental change. The link
between Arctic glacier melting and global
sea-level rise ought to be better incorporated
26
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
4
Cf. Heininen 2010. 10
h t t p : / / w w w. g u a r d i a n . c o . u k /
environment/2010/oct/15/eu-greenland-
5
For the debate on the Arctic Treaty see e.g. stewardship-arctic
Koivurova 2008, Koivurova & Molenaar
2009. EPPR, http://arctic-council.org/
11
working_group/eppr
6
On the Canadian Arctic sovereignty debate
12
see e.g The Ottawa Citizen (November 15 2100 km of shoreline fouled, 250000
2009): Cold Call; The Globe and the Mail seabirds killed, nearly 4000 sea otters killed,
(Nov 12 2009): Arctic Sovereignty: Lets’ 300 harbor seals killed, 250 bald eagles
join the Texan and St.Nick; Riddell-Dixon killed, more than 20 orcas killed, billions
2008. On Northwest Passage, US and of salmon and herring eggs destroyed.
Canada relations and law of the sea see e.g. $20 billion in subsistence harvest losses,
Sale 2009, 142-154. $19 million in lost visitor spending in the
year following the spill, at least $286.8
7
E.g. “An Arctic War is Getting Closer” million in losses to local ishermen (WWF
(Arctic Council News March 5, 2008), International Arctic Programme 2010).
“Arctic Oil Rush Sparks Battles Over
Seafloor” (National Geographic News
August 23, 2007), References
“Climate Change as Threat to U.S.
Security” (New York Times 9.8. 2009), ACIA (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
“Europe’s Arctic Adventure – The new cold
Archer, C. (1992). Arctic Cooperation. In
rush for resources” (euobserver 7.11.2008), Käkönen, J. (ed.): Vulnerable Arctic -Need
“Are the Russians Coming? (see Byers for an Alternative Orientation, 87–106.
2009, 1), “Cold Call” (The Ottawa Citizen Tampere Peace Research Institute.
November 15 2009), “Arctic Sovereignty” Arctic Council (2009). Arctic Offshore Oil
and Gas Guidelines. 29.4.2009. http://
(The Globe and Mail November 12 2009), arctic-council.org/filearchive/Arctic%20
“Arctic Meltdown. The Economic and Offhsore%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20
Security Implications of Global Warming” Guidelines%202009.pdf
(Borgersson 2008). Bellinger, J. (2008). Treaty on Ice. The New
York Times, June 23.
8
Browning, C. (2005). Remaking Europe in
On negative peace and structural violence the Margins. Northern Europe after the
see e.g. Galtung 1969. Enlargements. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Borgerson, S. (2008). Arctic Meltdown. The
9
Greenpeace International in the Arctic Economic and Security Implications of
Global Warming. Foreign Affairs, March/
Frontiers conference, Tromsø 26.1.2010. April 2008. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/
articles/63222/scott-g-borgerson/arctic-
meltdown
27
The Amazing Race. On resources, conlict and... NGP Yearbook 2011
Buzan, B.; Wæver, O. & de Wilde, J. (1998). Kleist, K. (2011). Speech by Greenland’s
Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Prime Minister. Oslo 10.1.2011.http://www.
Colorado, Lynne Rienner Publishers. businessweek.com/news/2011-01-11/
Chalecki, E. (2007). He Who Would Rule: greenland-steps-up-its-independence-calls-
Climate Change in the Arctic and its as-oil-ambitions-grow.html
Implications for U.S. National Security. Paper Koivurova, T. (2008). Alternatives for an Arctic
presented at the annual meeting of the Treaty – Evaluation and a New Proposal.
International Studies Association 48th RECIEL, vol. 17(1), 14-26.
Annual Convention, Chicago, Feb 28, K o i v u r o v a , T. & M o l e n a a r, E . ( 2 0 0 9 ) .
2007. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_ International Governance and Regulation of
mla_apa_research_citation/1/7/9/0/7/ the Marine Arctic. Oslo, WWF International
p179077_index.html Arctic Programme.
Correll, H. (2008). The North is not the Wild Käkönen, J. (ed.)(1992). Vulnerable Arctic
West. The Globe and Mail, 28.4.2008. http:// Need for an Alternative Orientation. Tampere
www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/ Peace Research Institute.
article682229.ece Lee, J.R. (2009). Climate Change and Armed
Durant, R. (2007). The Greening of the Conflict. Hot and Cold Wars. London,
U.S. Military. Washington: Georgetown Routledge.
University Press. Mariussen, Å.; Aalbu, H. & Brandt, M. (2000).
European Commission (2008). Communication Regional Organisations in the North. Report
from the Commission to the European 5:2000. Oslo, Royal Norwegian Ministry of
Parliament and the Council. The European Foreign Affairs.
Union and the Arctic Region. Brussels, NASA (2009). New NASA Satellite Survey
20.11.2008, COM(2008) 763, inal. Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2009/
Research. Journal of Peace Research, vol. jul/HQ_09-155_Thin_Sea_Ice.html
6(3), 167–191. NOOA (2009). Arctic Report Card: Atmosphere.
Heininen, L. (1991). Sotilaallisen läsnäolon http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/
ympäristöriskit Arktiksessa. Kohti Arktiksen atmosphere.html
säätelyjärjestelmää. Tampere: Rauhan- ja O ff e r d a l , K . ( 2 0 0 7 ) . O i l , g a s a n d t h e
konliktintutkimuslaitos TAPRI. environment. In Stokke, O. & Hønneland,
Heininen, L. (1992). National Approaches to the G. (eds.): International Cooperation and
Arctic. In Käkönen, J. (ed.): Vulnerable Arctic Arctic Governance. Regime effectiveness
Need for an Alternative Orientation, 35–65. and northern region building, 138–163.
Tampere Peace Research Institute. London & New York, Routledge.
Heininen, L. (2010). Geopolitics and security – Palosaari, T. & Möller, F. (2004). Security and
searching for a holistic picture. Presentation Marginality: Arctic Europe after the Double
in STETE Arctic Region seminar, Helsinki Enlargement. Cooperation & Conlict, vol.
17.12.2010. 39(3), 254–281.
Jalonen, O. (1992). Russian Naval Strategy: Palosaari, T. (2001). The Northern Dimension
The Feasibility of Non-Offensive Alternatives. – the Arctic Component. Conference on
In Käkönen, J. (ed.): Vulnerable Arctic the Swedish Initiative on the Barents
Need for an Alternative Orientation, 6–34. Euro-Arctic Co-operation and the Northern
Tampere Peace Research Institute. Dimension. Kiruna, Sweden, June 2001.
Joenniemi, P. (1997). Neo-nationalism or Riddell-Dixon, E. (2008). Canada’s Arctic
Regionalims. The Reconstucting of Political Continental Shelf Extension: Debunking
Space Around the Baltic Rim. Stockholm, Myths. Policy Options, September 2008.
NordREFO.
28
Nordia Geographical Publications 40: 4, 13–30 Teemu Palosaari
29