PLDT vs. GRIN. $8404 pe RMN es 4 Franchise te establi ihe tn Oceanic telecommunicahiong. In 1164, the orpora eee chang ‘198, ETc filed an applica of a Certificate of Public Petal and mainhin «lola Hobie Teephine Cyn and on Alpha Numeric faging System in MeWo Manila and Soulhern luaen, PLOT opposed with a Motion ee legislative framchie does ro of FEMME pervice NTC overruled PLOT: 0 Should be consfyved liberal NTC granted ET CT's provisi denied reconsideration. enc and prohbrtn wder Rule 1ssue: Whether Fhe petition for cerhorari is the proper remedy fe assoil the stats of ETCI a Wa "eight fo the ¢ be eny sven privilege hag been GrFeitgl < af Dn 1ASY, RA 20490 we te Express Telecommunicartios Co, (ETCT yee ee: NIC Ocober 19, mi rol snag Fein Alero ia Stati 7 daenestic and How te name was ee in. fin with NTC fr the issvand Convenient? and Neascity ty conshuch fo Digmiss due fo the fact that iy coftt systemwide telephone or nehvark opesition ond declared that RA 2090 «ln an order issued on December (4%, z onal aviherity. Dn May 1484, NTC ¢, PLDT filed a petition for certo; | § agsailing the two orders. frapychise. ercige. ae : a fi ranch, the preyagatwe writ af qve worry.