REFLECTION WEEK 3

I finished the remaining few chapters of Chapter 1 in the third lesson.

Linguistics includes framework, contrastive analysis, macro linguistic analysis, and
micro linguistic analysis. Two facets of comparative analysis that are related are
the goals of psychology and the techniques used in language science. The
framework's levels, categories, and language models were also examined. The four
categories that make up the levels are morphological, syntactic, lexis, and
phonological. Language categories consist of the parts on grammar, structure,
class, and system. The structural or "taxonomic" model—which comes from the
scientific process of classifying things or the classification of items into classes and
subclasses—as well as transformational generative grammar, contrastive
generative grammar, and case grammar were examined as grammatical language
models for contrastive analysis. The examination of these language models
allowed for the analysis of linguistic variances and convergences. Classifying
language parts is the primary objective of the structural or "taxonomic" approach,
whereas transformational generative grammar delves into the rules and
transformations that produce sentences. Comparative generative grammar analyzes
the structures of several languages, while case grammar looks at the arrangement
of words and phrases according to their grammatical functions.

The following sections compare and contrast the ideas of macrolanguage and
micro language. Macro linguistic contrastive analysis examines language in its
broadest sense, encompassing linguistically related cultural and behavioral
elements, whereas micro linguistic contrastive analysis explores language systems
in the abstract without accounting for expression meaning. A few fundamental
techniques that are commonly applied in contrastive analysis are covered in the
concluding portion of this chapter. The first chapter is now complete.