Perceived Ease of Use

Table 4.1 shows the descriptive statistics of the perceived ease of use of

Computerized Accounting System (CAS) of the respondents. Based on the mean score

average of 2.86, the barangay officials perceived computerized accounting system as easy

to use. This implies that it is easy for the barangay officials to learn and become skillful

in using the computerized accounting system. Moreover, barangay officials find

completing their duties in the barangay and understanding financial information to be

easy with the use of Computerized Accounting System (CAS).

Mean distribution on the level of acceptability in the use of computerized accounting

system in terms of perceived ease of use
Table 4.1
Perceived Ease of Use Mean Interpretation

1. Information produced by CAS is easy to understand. 2.99 Easy to use

2. CAS user find it simple to complete duties utilizing

2.95 Easy to use
the computerized accounting information system.

3. Learning to use CAS will be easy for me. 2.81 Easy to use

4. It will be easy for me to become skillful at using

2.81 Easy to use
CAS.

5. CAS is easy for me to use. 2.76 Easy to use

MEAN 2.86 Easy to use

Perceived Usefulness

Table 4.2 presents the descriptive statistics of the perceived usefulness of

Computerized of Accounting System (CAS) to the respondents. It was revealed that

Computerized Accounting System (CAS) is useful in performing the duties of barangay

officials as evidenced by a mean score of 3.12. This specifically means that barangay

officials find Computerized Accounting System (CAS) useful in completing their job

efficiently, raising productivity, providing accurate financial results, and minimizing the

loss of relevant information in the barangay.

Mean distribution on the level of acceptability in the use of computerized accounting

system in terms of perceived usefulness
Table 4.2
Perceived Usefulness Mean Interpretation

1. I can get information quickly and easily from CAS

3.16 Useful
when I need it.

2. The use of CAS will provide accurate results. 3.14 Useful

3. The use of CAS will allow me to complete my job

3.11 Useful
faster.

4. The use of CAS will minimize the loss of

3.11 Useful
information.

5. The use of CAS will increase my productivity. 3.10 Useful

MEAN 3.12 Useful

Job Relevance
Table 4.3 presents the descriptive statistics of job relevance of the computerized

accounting system to the respondents. With a mean score of 3.09, the data reveals that

computerized accounting system is relevant to the overall fulfillment of their job as

barangay officials in their respective barangays. Specifically, computerized accounting

system fits with the work practices of the barangay officials and precisely match their

purpose as barangay officials. Additionally, computerized accounting system is relevant

to improving their job performance, standardizing their work routine, and performing

their job as barangay officials in a systematic manner.

Mean distribution on the level of acceptability of computerized accounting system in

terms of job relevance
Table 4.3
Job Relevance Mean Interpretation

1. CAS will improve my job performance 3.11 Relevant

2. CAS will be helpful in performing my job

3.10 Relevant
systematically.

3. CAS is accurate for my purpose 3.08 Relevant

4. CAS will standardize my work routine 3.08 Relevant

5. CAS is compatible with my work practices 3.07 Relevant

MEAN 3.09 Relevant

Output Quality

Table 4.4 shows the descriptive statistics of output quality produced by the

computerized accounting system. Based on the mean score of 3.34, the respondents

confirm that the quality of outputs generated by the computerized accounting system are
very good. Moreover, the presence of computerized accounting system increases the

quality of outputs as recording, summarizing, and recording are made promptly.

Likewise, relevant and accurate information are produced, reports are produced in

readable form, and errors are easily edited.

Mean distribution on the level of acceptability of computerized accounting system in

terms of output quality
Table 4.4
Output Quality Mean Interpretation

1. Timely recording, summarizing, and

3.38 Very Good
reporting will be made with CAS.

2. Relevant information will be produced using

3.34 Very Good
CAS.

3. Reports will be produced in readable form

3.34 Very Good
using CAS.

4. In case of errors, reports can be easily

3.32 Very Good
edited using CAS.

5. Accurate information will be produced using

3.31 Very Good
CAS.

MEAN 3.34 Very Good

Table 4.5 presents the summary of descriptive statistics of the level of acceptability of

computerized accounting system in terms of output quality, perceived usefulness, job

relevance, and perceived ease of use. It was revealed that computerized accounting
system is extremely acceptable among barangay officials in terms of output quality. This

signifies that the use of a computerized accounting system improves the output quality by

allowing quick recording, summarizing, and recording. Similar to this, reports are created

in understandable form with relevant and accurate information, and errors are simple to

correct. Moreover, computerized accounting system is acceptable among barangay

officials in terms of perceived usefulness as it is of great benefit in carrying out their

duties effectively, increasing productivity, giving accurate financial results, and

minimizing the loss of important information in the barangay. Likewise, computerized

accounting system is acceptable among barangay officials for it is compatible with the

barangay officials' working methods and suitably serves their intended function.

Furthermore, the results also convey that CAS is acceptable for barangay officials

computerized accounting system in terms of perceived ease of use as it easy for the

barangay officials to learn and master. Additionally, barangay officials feel that using the

Computerized Accounting System (CAS) makes it simple for them to carry out their

obligations in the barangay and comprehend financial data.

Level of acceptability of Computerized Accounting System(CAS)

Table 4.5

Mean Interpretation

1. Output Quality 3.34 Extremely

Acceptable
2. Perceived Usefulness 3.12
Acceptable
3. Job Relevance 3.09
Acceptable
4. Perceived Ease of Use
2.86 Acceptable
Level of Acceptability 3.10 Acceptable