Writing coursework can be a challenging task, requiring a significant amount of time, research, and

dedication. The difficulty level depends on various factors, such as the complexity of the topic, the
depth of research required, and the specific guidelines provided by the educational institution.

For a coursework topic like "Evacuation GCSE Coursework," you may need to delve into historical
events, analyze primary and secondary sources, and present your findings in a well-structured and
coherent manner. This can be time-consuming and may pose challenges for students, especially when
balancing coursework with other academic and personal commitments.

In such situations, seeking assistance from external sources can be a viable option. ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ is one such platform that offers professional writing services. They have
experienced writers who can help you with your coursework, ensuring high-quality and well-
researched content. By availing of their services, you can alleviate some of the stress associated with
coursework and focus on other aspects of your academic journey.

However, it's essential to approach such services with caution and use them ethically. It's important
to ensure that the assistance received is in line with your educational institution's policies and
guidelines. Always review and understand the content provided to you to be able to engage
meaningfully with your coursework.

In conclusion, while writing coursework can be challenging, seeking assistance from reputable
services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a practical solution for students who may need
additional support in completing their assignments.
AQA GCSE History B Coursework Evacuation Sources Request. However, this could be a good
thing as it gives the interviewee plenty of time to reflect, think and make a correct judgement. This
could prove the photo gave a misleading interpretation to the British public, which would mean that
the photo was taken of people forcibly smiling and laughing and waving. It was made by Bernard
Kops in 1963 this might mean it is reliable because Bernard Kops experience was good and he might
want to keep remembering his experience. This makes it a lot more reliable for a historian to retain
evidence from it and be able to use it effectively. I know from my own studies that this did indeed
happen and therefore the Source does support my own knowledge. Overall evacuation was a success
for parents because it saved their parents lives which were probably the most important thing for
them. The main bombing targets were docks, factories and air bases. The Halt order was a brilliant
chance for the BEF to defend Dunkirk before the Germans got there. To conclude source C is a more
useful source than source B because it is an actual description to a photograph for a newspaper. I
believe that evacuation wad a great success because it saved a lot of lives. From 1917 German
bombers killed over 1,000 people, destroyed houses and shops during air raids. It suggests most
children were evacuated from schools by trains. Explain your answer using the sources and
knowledge from your studies. For example, transportation and industrial accidents that take place
end up in releasing harmful substances at homes, places of work or along the water bodies, which
make people to leave their homes and even places of work. Some people stayed with foster carers for
2 to 3 moths and went back because there was no bombing however some people stayed with the
foster cares for a long time up to six years. This photograph is limited because there is no writing to
go with it. In the event of an emergency we, as adults, have a checklist in our heads of actions that
need to be taken. This would have a knock on effect to the countries war effort - meaning there
would be a shortage of equipment for the troops to fight with. Looking at the source we can see that
the teacher is remembering how she was feeling during evacuation and also we can see that it was
written. AQA GCSE History B Coursework Evacuation Sources Request. They would probably have
been even more traumatised if they had stayed in London during the Blitz and seen the horrific
aftermath of nightly bombing and many of them wouldn’t even have survived. The United Kingdom
was split up into three areas; Evacuation, meaning areas that heavy bombing was expected; Neutral,
meaning areas that would not send or receive any evacuees and Reception, which was the rural areas
where evacuees would be sent. Also women and their contribution to the war effort was a reason
why the children were evacuated because they would have more free time to work in the munitions
factories and provide the men with more weapons. The government should have made more careful
checks on foster parents or allowed or allowed mothers of children over the age 15 to go with them if
they chose to, for instance. It was made by a 10 year old girl in 1939 to her mother in Liverpool. It
was true that some children were looking forward to going away. This resource hasn't been reviewed
yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it
Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. I would say that source is
not reliable because it says things that were not true and also it never happened. Had these children
still been at their homes, and then went to an air raid shelter when there was a scare, they would have
been very safe.
Also the main German attack was well under way led by armoured divisions and Panzers (German
tanks) who now began to move through the Ardennes. However the biggest success was the way that
evacuation saved the children from the bombing, and the mental torment that so many adults
suffered in the citied when the Blitz eventually began in 1940 because caused such immense
devastation in London. By January 1940, an estimated one million evacuees had returned home this
shows that parents did not like evacuation and doubted the danger. Empty reply does not make any
sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel sinclairjen 5 years ago report 5 We really enjoyed this
PowerPoint. Children also had a good time in the country side as it was a very nice experience.
Success of evacuation - GCSE History - Marked by Teachers com. Many evacuees had bad
experiences and some had good experiences with the host families. Many of these children who were
too young to understand what was going on thought of it as a trip into the unknown, which really
excited them and gave them a chance to see the world more openly. This money was to pay for the
evacuees and the food and other essentials they would need, but the reality of it was that a lot of the
time this money was not spent on the evacuee. It is very instrumental to install the emergency
lighting system so as to provide enough light in the room in case of the event. However, the child
should also know other personal information that may not be readily known, depending on the age
of the child. The government done a pretty good job by evacuating one and a half million children
over a period of four days, this was done by the government taking over the whole transport system
and only transporting evacuee children out of the major cities. Within days, 1.5 million children,
pregnant women and the disabled had been evacuated from the cities and into the countryside. Some
hosts exploited the evacuees, making them work almost little slaves on their farms or as unpaid
domestic servants and there were even cases of neglect, cruelty and sexual abuse. There is a
reasonable explanation though for the lack of the children going to the countryside, some parents had
friends or relative in foreign countries such as Canada, USA, South Africa, Australia and the
Caribbean. Some children had a very bad time because they were sent to unsuitable foster parents
but most were well treated and ha an interesting new expensive of a experience of a different life
style which made them more independent and mature. To conclude source C is a more useful source
than source B because it is an actual description to a photograph for a newspaper. This essay will
examine the reasons why the government introduced evacuation. The interview was taken almost 50
years after the evacuation; hence some would say that the source is slightly unreliable as it is hard for
someone to recall incidents that took place 50 years ago. It suggests most children were evacuated
from schools by trains. Children should be prepared to assist and handle any situation that can come
up. The main concern of parents and teachers were that the children would not be happy away from
home or safe, and by producing material like sources B and D the government was trying to make
the public believe that these fears that they had were only fears and were not going to be a reality
when they evacuated their children. This source is an objective source because e in the source it does
state about the source being on time. My conclusion is that the evacuation didn’t run as smoothly as
the propaganda said it did. The source being a photograph has many uses; it provides one with a
virtual image of the happenings. This once again puts the British people on edge and the Government
must be prepared in the build up to war. In case the event is in form of weather condition, you might
have a day to ready. Maintenance of the equipments used is very vital since it helps in ensuring that
they are in good conditions always. This isn’t that useful as there is not writing to go with the
photographs and has obviously been used in a newspaper. From the early summer of 1939 the
government started publicising through the authorities by issuing posters, leaflets and messages to
the public.
By being released during the war, it is likely that it was used to encourage parents to send their
children away from danger or back from where they came from as many had been sent back home
due to the lack of bombing going on. However, some seemingly limited victories may foster
situations in which everyone wins. In the source you could see that two children holding tight to each
other and also the country behind them are being bombed. Also Dunkirk is on the coast so it would
be very easy for them to be evacuated back to Britain. In addition to this the children that were
evacuated had access to clean food and water, they were also provided wit medicine and schools.
Considering the short notice that evacuation would occur, the planning and organisation was felt by
many as a huge success. If evacuation was well planned they would not put up posters asking to look
after children. There are series of factors one should consider before installation. It is a useful source
but not in depth as some of the other sources. The were often shocked and appalled at the lifestyles
of the city children but in the long term it brought success because it made them keen to get the
government to pass laws to help the poor after the war was over, which was very helpful. In the
interview the father states how he believes that his child would be better off at home because the
place where they wanted to send him did not have enough resources to look after him. However the
Source is not reliable as it was used as propaganda and therefore it would be being used to influence
someone’s opinion, rather than represent the true facts. This would have a knock on effect to the
countries war effort - meaning there would be a shortage of equipment for the troops to fight with.
Worksheets and practice exam questions are included as well as a fact sheet which means you do not
need the use of text book. The actual figure was that only 60,595 people died throughout the whole
of the war. I asked my granddad about his experience and he told me, “Living in the countryside in
Lancashire was very enjoyable. From my own knowledge I know that some evacuees were treated
fairly well and some treated badly. This Source once again represents evacuation in a negative way
and it tells us about the social differences between town and country people. I don’t think Source B
was good evidence because it was only one picture of people being evacuated, there were probably
many other images of evacuees, but being unhappy, not the opposite. It suggests that a small number
of children were filthy. The interview took place in 1988 making it a secondary source because it was
written after evacuation took place. This bombing was not purpose though, instead of dropping
bombs on a military target they drifted off course and dropped them in the centre of London,
Destroying a few houses and a few civilians. The father’s view is very against evacuation, as he
believes that the children are best off with their own parents. The photograph could have been staged
just to show the workers that there children were safe and happy. From my own knowledge I know
that the government evacuated children out of cities to country sides because there is bombings’
taking place in cities. Even though there were many negatives about evacuation I still believe that the
life of children is far more precious than the bonding of two different classes. Scholars can use them
for free to gain inspiration and new creative ideas for their writing assignments. The main purpose of
the source was to show that most aspects of evacuation were a failure. This source is not biased
because its fives positive and negative sides. Some even sent their own children there on holidays,
for the country people who took in the evacuees the successful contacts came from.
Furthermore, it can also be seen in Source B that the evacuees were very well supervised as they
were being evacuated. This therefore means that the Source is unlikely to be a use of propaganda and
it is more likely to be used as a way of teaching people about the evacuation in the Second World
War. With over a decade of experience in animal welfare, Becky lends her expertise to Simple Family
Preparedness through insightful info about pets, livestock, bee keeping, and the practicalities of
homesteading. However the Source is not reliable as it was used as propaganda and therefore it
would be being used to influence someone’s opinion, rather than represent the true facts. All the
information they had had was posters and campaigns to persuade the public to agree with
evacuation. The ships that were used at first for the evacuation were the Barges and the cross
Channel Ferries. It was to reassure then that their children were safe and well. The same goes for the
parents, how could they concentrate on the war effort if they were too worried about how their
children were. Michael Carney 10 TT History Coursework (2) How Successful was Evacuation?The
thought of evacuation for many will result in a divided opinion. Source F is an interview where the
old “evacuee” is trying to get rid of the stereotypes about the evacuation. Overall I believe that some
aspects of evacuation were a success, as the government achieved its aim of keeping children safe
from the bombs, however, their were allot of negatives and therefore I believe that evacuation was
not a complete success. It also important to have the hard hats and the safety shoes for head and foot
protection. This makes it a lot more reliable for a historian to retain evidence from it and be able to
use it effectively. The country people could not the attitude and deprivation of the town children.
This might mean it is reliable because I know that evacuees got separated because their parents had to
stay at vital cities and their children had to be sent to the countryside. Source B shows evacuees
going to a train station in London ready with their belongings to be evacuated to the countryside.
Also a lot of money was spent on evacuation and hence some of the money was not able to be spent
on the war. This is a very useful source as it is an interview with the mother of a host family. To
conclude source C is a more useful source than source B because it is an actual description to a
photograph for a newspaper. For example, being separated in a store, as an adult, isn’t as big of a
concern as it is with a small child. It was made by a teacher in 1940 to show how children were
evacuated. The Source shows fostering in a good light and it therefore shows evacuation in a good
light. It also showed that the government cared about the future generations and this made people
more confident.The next positive thing to be said about evacuation was the amount of lives that
were saved. Source C contradicts Source B because it says how many children were very afraid
about the prospect of being evacuated. History Evacuation Coursework - GCSE History - Marked by
Teachers. Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. Teaching Your
Children to be Prepared in Case of Emergencies. This include 827 thousand school children under
school age, 13 thousand expectants mothers, 103 thousand. Normally the groups were children from
babies to teenagers, but the problem was that the babies and small children needed their older
counterparts for protection and comfort. Source C suggests that the children were afraid of
evacuating and this is totally opposite to source B.
Evidence such as “”you will be doing a real service for the nation”. This source may be unreliable
because it is a secondary source and it is one persons view. I believe that evacuation was a great
success because they managed to evacuate masses of people within a short space of time. It is most
probable that it was used to reassure parents that their children were healthy and eating properly.
When the evacuees had reached their destinations they were taken to reception areas, these varied
from being a local school, village hall or church. On French soil there were minor, local skirmishes
with the maginoline on the border of France. However the negatives about evacuation are children
being treated badly by their foster carers and children having difficulty bonding with the foster
carers. If evacuation was well planned they would not put up posters asking to look after children. It
was made by a 10 year old girl in 1939 to her mother in Liverpool. On the other hand it might mean
it is unreliable because the girl has just got there and she is just telling her first thoughts about the
host families and she hasn’t had much experience with the host family. Foster carers were paid 10
shillings and 6d a week for fostering the first child, this was a lot of money and many people took
advantage of it. Parents now were desperate to get their children out of target areas and between
September 1940 and December 1941, over 1,250,000 were helped by the government to leave the
cities. The source wanted to make people think that children were happy and also to show that
evacuation was very successful. I believe that evacuation was a great success because it removed the
potential target of civilians from the Nazi’s. Therefore women and children were evacuated to the
countryside because it was dangerous for people to stay in cities while the bombing was taking place.
The answers to these questions would help create a purpose for the source. The boy is smiling. This
suggests that the evacuees are having a good time. Practicing the plan made underway will ensure
that the problems and the weaknesses in the plans are identified at their primary stages and the
corrective measure taken before everything goes a mess. To conclude this source does have some use
to historian but cannot ever be as useful as an interview or some notes from a diary. Write a review
Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. Also the little boats
were getting used to picking up soldiers from the beaches. Moreover, the employees should be taken
to seminars and workshops and trained adequately on how to handle unexpected behavior as well as
providing necessary assistant to people with such problems. Additionally, they should be made aware
on how to handle mentally impaired persons and make good attempts to communicate with them
efficiently, in a loving and caring manner. Nevertheless, the source may be reliable as the author may
have based the book upon a true situation and facts and will have possibly done a fair bit of research
on evacuation before writing the novel. I would not say that this source is useful because it cannot be
proven that it is a reliable source. For this reason, the fact that there were such huge social
differences between town and country people shows that evacuation was not successful. This once
again puts the British people on edge and the Government must be prepared in the build up to war.
The natural reaction to a camera is to smile, and this could have been the case with this source. In
addition to this, we do not know the purpose of the interview, and therefore cannot test its reliability
as the teacher could be lying. On one hand I would say the source is reliable because it was taken at
1939 which was the time of evacuation. From my own knowledge I know that some children were
poor who couldn’t afford to get clothes for themselves.
The interview took place in 1988 making it a secondary source because it was written after
evacuation took place. This photograph was taken and published at the same time as when the war
broke out and the children were being evacuated. Protective kits and equipment must be based on
the likelihood of the hazard at work place and the ability of the workers to use them. I can see that
this source is a biased source because it only talks about negative things about evacuation. Lesson 10:
Developments in the Treatment of Infections, Broken Bones inc. The source being a photograph has
many uses; it provides one with a virtual image of the happenings. The sources that people had a
positive experience of evacuation because evacuees made new friends with host families. It was
made by a teacher in 1940 to show how children were evacuated. Any contingency plan is better
than failing to plan completely. However, I know from my own knowledge that many children were
not happy whilst living at their foster homes and many were bullied and abused by their foster
families. Some hosts exploited the evacuees, making them work almost little slaves on their farms or
as unpaid domestic servants and there were even cases of neglect, cruelty and sexual abuse. Overall,
this Source is extremely negative and therefore it does not support the opinion that evacuation was a
great success. The truth is that the emergencies and disasters can strike anyone, anytime and
anywhere and therefore preparing for them is very essential. Great visual primary sources and
information Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel SGA25 6
years ago report 5 Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel
annabelelliott 7 years ago report 4 A really effective way to introduce the topic - thank you. The
government wanted support for this campaign, and wanted to gain the public’s trust that their
children would be happy when evacuated. It was alright for the only children, but for the groups, it
was a disaster. Therefore, the effort put in to save these children was unnecessary as it was pretty
convincing evidence that they would have been ok in the cities. It is very important to alert the
family members or the workers on how to respond to the cyclone watches and warnings for it helps
them escape the danger within a short period of time. Many evacuees had bad experiences and some
had good experiences with the host families. It saved lives of the evacuees because they were away
from being targeted by Nazi’s as civilians. It is a photograph taken by the government so it could and
probably was used for propaganda. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.
Furthermore, if the photo was staged then it is also useful because it could show us that evacuation
was not a success because the government had to lie to the people just to prove to them that there
children were safe and happy and they would only have to lie if they had something to hide. Some of
it was bound to happen because any young child sent away from home for the first time was going to
be unhappy, but some of it could have been prevented. Living conditions were much more adequate
than my own house and the people there were nice people who treated my very respectfully. On the
other hand it might not be reliable because we don’t know what happen after they for home or
finished donkey riding. The photograph could have been staged just to show the workers that there
children were safe and happy. It would used to entertain children and this is what its main purpose
would be. The main purpose of the source is to show that the government was very bad at organising
evacuees with carers. The ships that were used at first for the evacuation were the Barges and the
cross Channel Ferries.