Writing coursework can be a challenging task, especially when dealing with complex topics like

GCSE History, particularly the infamous Jack the Ripper case. This type of coursework requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and the ability to present information in a structured and
coherent manner. Students often face challenges in finding reliable sources, organizing their
thoughts, and meeting the specific requirements of the assignment.

However, it's important to emphasize the importance of academic integrity and ethical writing
practices. While seeking assistance or guidance is acceptable, promoting the use of external services,
such as ordering coursework from websites like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, may raise ethical concerns.
Academic institutions usually discourage or prohibit the use of such services as it undermines the
learning process and the development of essential skills.

Instead of outsourcing the entire coursework, students are encouraged to seek help from teachers,
classmates, or legitimate academic resources. This fosters a better understanding of the subject
matter and helps students develop crucial skills such as research, critical thinking, and effective
communication.

If students find the coursework challenging, it's advisable to break down the task into manageable
parts, create a detailed plan, and seek guidance when needed. Many educational institutions offer
support services, including writing centers and academic advisors, to help students navigate
coursework challenges.

In conclusion, while writing coursework on topics like GCSE History Jack the Ripper can be
demanding, it's essential to approach it with academic integrity and a commitment to personal
growth. Encourage students to seek assistance within the educational framework to enhance their
learning experience rather than resorting to external services.
Source B and C are official reports written by professionals whose job it was to investigate murders.
This was a major mistake as this could have been vital evidence that would have helped solve the
case. I can infer that this would conjure up a gruesome image in the reader’s mind of the murderer
enjoying killing the victims. Another inference I can make from this source is that the killings in
Whitechapel not only shocked the local community, but also the whole of London as it states in the
text, “startled London”. I believe this because there was a lack of police at the time as quoted in
source A1 but also we found from source A6 that fingerprinting and police photographing was
appointed after the 1900’s. If you believe there are any errors, please email me directly in the first
instance to resolve the issue. Also, the police failed to hand out a reward for any information or
encourage the public to help them in any way, although in doing so, avoided even more hoaxes. Our
customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.99 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY
NOW Save for later ?7.99 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 20 March
2022 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through
facebook Share through pinterest Robert Redfield 4.68 33 reviews Not the right resource. The
description of the Ripper given by William Hutchinson was taken very seriously by Inspector
Abberline. He had dark eyes, a slight moustache curled u at the end, and dark hair. The murders were
put to the forefront of Londoners’ minds by the press. Many people pretended to be Jack the Ripper
so they could get food and somewhere to sleep overnight, which meant the police had no idea who
was lying and who was telling the truth. Were the police to blame for Jack the Ripper not being
caught. Source B1, B2 and B6 were written by middle class visitors to Whitechapel. From her
pockets a piece of cloth, and to combs were found next to her body. The doctors who did the
autopsies of the bodies often disagreed about some things, such as if it was likely that the Ripper
had any anatomical knowledge. They let the bloodhounds loose and regrettably they never returned.
Evidence suggested the Ripper was a lunatic, so lunatics were rounded from all corners but to no
avail. He then called to a second man, who was on the other side of the road. The police were most
definitely accountable for the lose of these lives. The cases that were normally heard in the Old
Bailey last a matter of minutes. I hope they will be useful for many years to come and make a
worthwhile investment. Sylvester77 9 months ago report 5 Fab resource - well worth every penny
Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel chloewestie1992 4 years
ago report 5 Show replies RAResources 4 years ago Thank-you for taking the time to review this
lesson pack, I love receiving such positive feedback. On Friday 31 August 1888, a woman named
Polly Nicholls was found dead in Buck’s Row by a man named Charles Cross. He was a man over
forty as far as I could tell.” From Ms. Long’s quotation it’s clear that the man she saw was unknown
in the area. As if the press didn't have exclusive coverage over the murders, they had to create false
letters and signed them from 'Jack'. This should have indicated to the police that this person was
probably local and knew his way about without any problem even in the dark. There wasn't that many
witnesses but they didn't know what the Ripper looked like because there was no street lights and it
was dark and they didn't know what he was wearing because it looked dark but they wasn't certain,
and they reckon her possibly worked alone of a night. Dr Bond was the only medical expert who
believed this. Therefore we can assume the police were becoming stronger. They worked up to
fourteen hours a day, seven days a week.
Mary Ann Cox, another prostitute, saw Mary Kelly going into Miller’s Court with a man at 11:45om.
Certain things the police do, like the CID work would find and even keep a close eye on the streets in
this aspect the police were good at this work with other aspects such as dressing up lady’s to go
undercover for work would prove completely useless and would be better off working on patrolling
the streets or distributing leaflets or making them better. A lot of small businesses in Whitechapel
were run by foreigners so there would have been a lot of people who fitted Elizabeth Long’s. In
addition to this the police would do house to house knockings to ask for any suspicious characters
seen. Often because of this motive, the police were attacked by mobs of the poorer classes and
severely injured with broken bones and often wounds from a knife or weapon. It shows that there are
houses all near this site, so some people must have seen or head something, when only 3 people came
forward with sightings. Only a skilled person could know where to find the organs and recognise
them when they were found. Many people pretended to be Jack the Ripper so they could get food
and somewhere to sleep overnight, which meant the police had no idea who was lying and who was
telling the truth. Hide replies Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply
Cancel boycekatherine 7 years ago report 5 These look really great thank you so much you have
saved me a ton of work. It shows that the murder sites were close together which should have helped
the police to catch Jack the Ripper, as they would have known the areas to patrol and search, but the
place where he killed where random. Jack the Ripper could very well have held regular employment,
and even had a wife and children. But this evidence could have been really important to the case, as
in identifying the Ripper’s handwriting. The source describes how people demanded that the police
force be strengthened to try and create some kind of order on the streets at night, and to try and put
a stop to the murders. Then again, it was written near the time of the murders and they got the times
correct so it could be reliable. In my opinion, this was a pathetic fault in their enquiry and the
evidence was used as a weak excuse to target the working class foreigners. He was wearing a black
coat and carrying a black bag about a foot long. They worked up to fourteen hours a day, seven days
a week. The source says “my informant was referred from one police office to another, but without
making any impression”. In my opinion, I think the main reason why he was never caught was
because in Victorian times, forensic science was still at its infancy. Most of the local residents
mistrusted the police anyway, and would refuse to tell them anything to cover up their own petty
crimes. He believed that he lived in the neighbourhood and he saw him around one day. The only
limitation would be there wouldn’t have been any forensic evidence to support it. Source J is a
photograph of the site where Annie Chapman died. From the dead victims known to the police they
were all prostitutes, and with 1 in 5 women being prostitutes in North London, quite alot women
were at great risk of falling to be his next victim. Like the other victims, her throat had been slashed
and her windpipe cut in two. Source C talks about the incision which cut the windpipe 'completely in
two' which shows that this was a planned and not frenzied like the one described in source A,
because if this would have been the case the windpipe would not have been cut completely in two
because it would have been done much quicker. Everyone apparently containing some headquarters
of infamy. However, Source E is only a part of an article published in a local newspaper and does not
provide any facts to consolidate the reasons regarding the escape of the Ripper. However, it is a
primary source so includes some reliability. People warned that the murders would continue if the
police did not take some kind of action.
The media made it possible for the Whitechapel murders and Jack the ripper to attract all the
attention in 1888. He then called to a second man, who was on the other side of the road. The main
victim’s names were: Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and
Mary Jane Kelly. I can trust is as it is facts and therefore can’t be biased. It’s also limited because it
doesn’t tell us the purpose why they were written. Sources B and C are about how the Ripper had
'Anatomical skill' and how he planned each murder, this would have narrowed the search to people
like doctors but if the Ripper planned each murder there would have been harder for the police to
catch him because he knew exactly what he was doing. This was a major mistake as this could have
been vital evidence that would have helped solve the case. The press wanted to make it seem as if
they were communicating with him. In many market towns the police collected tolls from traders
and in larger towns they inspected tramcars. But not all the body's were disturbed in the same way.
Watkins had passed through the square at 1:30am, but when he returned at 1:44am, he found a body
lying in the corner. Source A connects Martha Tabrams murder with Polly Nicholls murder, with
Martha Tabram’s murder including 39 stabs on the body showing no skill whereas Polly Nicholls
windpipe was slashed twice and shows some anatomical skill for the body hitting precise areas,
contradicting Martha Tabram’s murder. This was because in Elizabeth Long’s statement she said that
the man who was talking to Annie Chapman looked like a foreigner and partly from simple Anti-
Semitism. Due to the hazy evidence provided, Long failed to narrow the police search, and may have
potentially misled them in their search to capture the Ripper. The cases that were normally heard in
the Old Bailey last a matter of minutes. Write a review Update existing review Submit review
Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. One reason for this is because the commissioner, of the
metropolitan police, ordered that the message written by chalk at the death place of Catherine Edows
to be wiped away. Additionally, it states he was a foreigner, this report was taken extremely
seriously and the police acted immediately to track down a foreigner that matched this uncertain
description. Source C is the report of Dr. Fredrick Blackwell on the corpse of Elizabeth Stride. The
only limitation would be there wouldn’t have been any forensic evidence to support it. If this advice
was taken the murders that were to come may have been stopped. However, it is a primary source so
includes some reliability. And also at this time, more people were becoming literate and the cheap
papers were accessible to all classes However the local paranoia, and lack of protection and security
was becoming unnerving in 1888, how would the police react to a so-called, “psycho serial killer!”.
However, the fact remains that every victim was a prostitute, killed in Whitechapel, with their throats
cut, and slice open in perhaps a surgical manner. With Source F being a leaflet that was handed out at
a time it purposes was to tell people to inform the police if they see any suspicious characters. The
Bow Street Runners had been set up in 1749, and the River Police in 1798. There was a lack of
witnesses dur to street lighting and the places of where he met these ladies. Source D is a description
of Jack the Ripper, the description is very vague and not very clear, there are lots of words like 'I
think' in there. Source F shows that the police did send out many leaflets to try and get some
information, the leaflet needs more information on it like a description but this was probably the first
time they have done this. If Jack the Ripper was here now, in modern day London and did the same
thing, we could be sure that he would’ve been caught in a few weeks, or even days.