Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEY INSIGHT #2
A pivotal role for renewable methanol
As a platform for chemicals, fuels and food.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Renewable methanol holds great potential
for closing the carbon loop. VoltaChem
researchers conducted an analysis of the
potential of renewable methanol as a
circular carbon platform in the production
of fuels, plastics and proteins in the
Netherlands. It shows that production of
renewable methanol from various sources
is chemically feasible in a cost-effective
manner. When applied across the three
value chains, renewable methanol can
result in a significant reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions. It also provides
Figure 1: The left of this figure shows the production for renewable methanol that is synthesized
the prospect of outcompeting fossil-based
from syngas containing renewable hydrogen (generated through water electrolysis) and renewable
fuels, plastics and proteins in the CO2 (obtained from various sources). Renewable methanol can play a pivotal role in the key value
foreseeable future. chains at the right: fuels, polymers and proteins.
INTRODUCTION hydrogen (generated through water The drawn horizontal lines provide an
If the world wants to mitigate rising global electrolysis with 100% renewable indication of the cost development of
temperatures, it is imperative to reduce electricity) and renewable CO2 (obtained fossil-based methanol - of which the 2022
greenhouse gas emissions as soon as from various sources). The right part level was established before the steep rise
possible. With worldwide emissions depicts three major value chains: fuels (e.g. of natural gas prices in Europe. The
amounting to some 50 billion tons kerosene), polymers (produced from analysis shows that methanol from
annually, a tipping point in global warming olefins) and proteins. The first two replace alternative feedstocks such as waste and
is nearing. The latest IPCC report (released current value chains based upon fossil biobased sources are already becoming
April 2022) shows that urgent and drastic resources, the third replaces the current competitive with methanol produced from
action is needed to keep the increase soy-based value chain which also comes natural gas. For CCU methanol, using CO2
below 1.5 degree Celsius, as was agreed with substantial CO2 emissions. Our study and H2 as feedstock, this is not yet the
upon in the Paris Agreement. A crucial part benchmarks the carbon footprint and case. However, it is expected that in the
of the solution is to move away from economics of these three renewable future green energy mix the costs of CCU
fossil-based energy production and methanol based value chains against the methanol will evolve towards those of bio
achieve carbon circularity in the current commercial references. and waste methanol. In particular the cost
production of materials. Regarding the of green hydrogen will decrease due to the
latter, the use of methanol provides great METHANOL PRODUCTION COST growing availability of renewable energy,
opportunities. The first analysis concerns the production more efficient electrolysis, and increasing
When produced in a renewable way, cost for renewable methanol based on economies of scale.
methanol can be at the pivot of a various feedstocks. As represented in
sustainable and circular economy. This is Figure 2, cost ranges were established EMISSIONS IN THE VALUE CHAINS
depicted in Figure 1. The left part shows both for the current (2020) fossil energy For the subsequent value chain analysis of
the production of renewable methanol cost (blue bars) and the forecasted (future) fuels, plastics and proteins, CCU methanol
from syngas derived from renewable costs for renewable energy (green bars). based on Direct Air Capture and green
€/ton
proteins production the reduction can be 1200
more than tenfold. Producing protein from 1000
8
proteins for various CCU methanol
feedstock prices. The comparison with
6
current price levels indicates that the costs
of fuels and proteins resulting from a CCU
4
methanol based value chain can be
competitive with current price levels,
2
depending on the cost of the CCU
methanol. For CCU based olefins, the price 0
level of the CCU methanol should develop Coal based CCU Fossil CCU Soy Single cell
Olefins Olefins Kerosene Kerosene protein* protein
towards the lowest range of the predicted
future price.
Figure 3: Comparison of Cradle to Cradle greenhouse gas emissions between by CCU methanol
based products and their current fossil-based counterparts. * For soy-based protein (imported from
A PERSPECTIVE ON THE NUMBERS Brazil), the figure includes emissions resulting from land use.
To further place the above analysis into
perspective, the availability aspect needs
Cost of product
to be considered. For the Netherlands,
3500
approximately 122 Mton of CCU methanol €300/ton