Writing a coursework, especially in a subject like Maths, can be quite the brain-bender.

It's not just

about regurgitating formulas; you've got to showcase your problem-solving prowess and analytical
skills. For a C3 Maths Coursework, you're diving into the realms of differential equations, numerical
methods, and all that good stuff.

Now, if you find your brain doing mental gymnastics and the deadline looming like a storm cloud,
considering some help might not be a bad idea. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ could be a lifesaver. They've
got the brains for the technicalities and the finesse for the language, so you can focus on not pulling
your hair out.

Remember, it's okay to seek a helping hand. Whether it's unraveling the intricacies of calculus or
simply making sense of your own notes, getting a bit of support can make the journey through
coursework less of a headache.
When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new
point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. But among the three methods, I think
change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. There isn’t any iteration
and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel.
Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 20% A bundle is a package of resources grouped
together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. The reason is that it only
involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. This makes it particularly useful if
computer software is not available. However the need for much manual computation can make the
process quite laborious and time consuming. Because of this it is the most difficult method to use,
especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that
the function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. After finding the roots, we can leave
Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest of the change of signs method. If the gradient function is
zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. It is shown that the
root lies between -1.53407035 and -1.53407025. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson
method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods. This process is then
repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy.
Otherwise, it is possible for us to miss the other roots. This makes it much easier than excel but it is
again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to
as many decimal places as needed. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's
good to leave some feedback. So when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0
into the equation, I get the following results. Bundle As and A2 Mathematics resources for all topics
C1, C2, C3 and C4. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of
rearrangements fail. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is
very easy to enter all the information into Excel. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula,
it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5
decimal places. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. But after the 4 th iteration,
we have reached a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal
places. However, if we do the integer search, we can only get 1 change of sign. Compared to the
change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been
entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times. Join our team of reviewers and
help other students learn. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge
to the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. So using
the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555.
Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can
be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. This is because the tangent crosses the
asymptote, as shown below. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001. With the
use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient
function. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be
worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. If I only had a scientific calculator,
Newton Raphson will be the fastest way to find the roots. However the need for much manual
computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. Therefore, we might miss the
other two after finding the first one. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the
failure of the graph. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00
(no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later Last updated 17 January 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews
Not the right resource. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be
done using a computer. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first one. Some
methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more complex. If so, I
think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. But whichever bit of software
you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. To do this, we need to
find the gradient at that point. It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just involves one step.
The iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. So I used the formula to
work out the values in excel. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the
roots. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with
the use of the formula. Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use
as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many
times. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is
always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not
converge to the root but it will diverge away. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to
20% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of
lessons, in one place. Bundle As and A2 Mathematics resources for all topics C1, C2, C3 and C4.
When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new
point on the x-axis, called X 4, which is equal to -3.5273. It is shown that the root lies between -
1.53407035 and -1.53407025. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range
at the root which is found. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate
to the real solution but more easily. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as
it is not completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very
repetitive.
Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. If I only had a scientific
calculator, Newton Raphson will be the fastest way to find the roots. This makes it particularly useful
if computer software is not available. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s
denominator is the gradient function of f(x). When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and
extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 4, which is equal to -
3.5273. A change of sign will always indicate a root if the function is continuous. Otherwise, it is
possible for us to miss the other roots. It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just involves one
step. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required
level of accuracy. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. Then we look at where the
tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. This
repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough
significant levels). It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of
rearrangements fail. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest
of the change of signs method. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess and this
process is repeated to converge on the root. Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to
the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. The Decimal search method
enables you to get a very close approximate to the real solution but more easily. What is more? There
is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find out the
values that correct to 5 decimal places. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the
formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel. Writing the formula in a cell and
dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. Despite this, it is a
very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many
decimal places if the right software is used. Write a review Update existing review Submit review
Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. See
other similar resources ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in
one cell and dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very
easy to use. This will mean that the gradient function will equal to zero. With the use of excel, it can
be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub in the x values. The reason is that it only
involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. When the line met the curve, a tangent is
drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is
equal to -3.5566. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the
method to fail.
It’s very easy for us to use autograph and it just involves one step. The iterations are also wrong as
they diverge away from the point as well. However, if we do the integer search, we can only get 1
change of sign. But among the three methods, I think change of signs method should be chosen as
the easiest and quickest one. This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on
the root to the required level of accuracy. Also, if the too roots are too close together, we might miss
the other two a fter finding the first one. This makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of
the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. This is the only hard part of the
method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula. As the function
f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root. So using the Re- arrangement method
to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. What is more? There is a function of zooming in
the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find out the values that correct to 5
decimal places. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an
impossible fraction. But whichever bit of software you use, it is hands down the easier way of
finding the roots of an equation. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out
initially and then I will use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. This resource hasn't
been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this
resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. This
makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal
places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. Looking at the graph
you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. All resources include detailed definitions, diagrams
and activities. ?24.00 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your
happiness. This reason is that the two points are too close to each other. What is more? There is a
function of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find out the
values that correct to 5 decimal places. Bundle As and A2 Mathematics resources for all topics C1,
C2, C3 and C4. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub
in the x values. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more
complex. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the iterations for you, which, if
they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search. Taking x 0 as the first guess
at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. The
value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. Also, using change
of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it takes a bit
longer than other methods, though. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to
find the roots. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. Despite this, it is a very
effective method as failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many
decimal places if the right software is used.