Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Member-only story
14.9K 218
When Wellington Lytle checked into a Milwaukee hotel after the 1929 stock
market crash, he was down to his last four cents and emptied of hope.
But before he put a revolver to his head, he took out a pen and left the
following note:
Even in his last moments, Lytle wanted his corporeal remains and soul
utilized by the world he was leaving. A century later, men still carry this
burden — their self-worth is tied to their usefulness.
Today we call these utilitarian men "good providers." And while society ties
itself in knots, defining what it means to be a provider, for many men, it
comes down to feeling useful.
Unfortunately, when men are asked to lie down in this Procrustean bed,
many respond in one of two dangerous ways.
We should all know the statistics by now. Although depression rates are
higher in women, young men die by suicide at four times the rate of young
women.
Then there is the education gap. In his latest book, Of Boys and Men: Why the
Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do about It, Richard
Reeves outlines some alarming statistics. Women outnumber men in
colleges 4 to 3 and are more likely to graduate high school. This drop in
educated men spells trouble for their future employment options. 1 in 3 men
without a high school diploma has dropped out of the labor force. (Not
unemployed, not working.)
But what is truly frustrating about the education gap is it didn't happen
overnight. Men's education levels began dropping in the 1980s. Why are we
finally addressing it now?
Reeves' solution is to "red shirt" boys — have them enrolled in school a year
later to address developmental delays. When I first heard this solution, I
balked, but Reeves makes a valid point. We adjusted STEM programs to
attract more women but never changed the education system to address the
boys who lag in emotional intelligence. (Statistically, they catch up to girls.)
Reeves also points out that this "men as providers" belief endures despite the
closing wage gap within marriages. According to a 2021 U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics study, 30% of wives now earn more than their husbands. But as
Mad Men masculinity is left behind with poodle skirts and bullet bras, many
men are not rejoicing. Households in which the wife is the breadwinner are
50% more likely to end in divorce, and husbands who make less than their
wives are more likely to cheat.
Hardcore feminists scold men for not evolving fast enough. But why should
men’s beliefs change when society constantly reinforces anachronistic ideals
of masculinity? Case in point. A 2017 Pew Research Center study found that
71% of Americans believe "it is very important for a man to be able to
support a family financially to be a good husband or partner." (Only 32% felt
a woman's financial contribution defined her as a "good partner.”)
But another Pew Research Center study shines a harsher black light on
masculinity. Researchers asked women and men where they found meaning,
fulfillment, and satisfaction. They found women found happiness through
multiple sources, but men did not.
But here's the real problem. We dismantled masculinity and didn't leave a
blueprint to build the new digs. Or, to put a finer point on this debate,
therapist Jonathan Decker posited that "limiting masculinity," not toxic
masculinity, is to blame for this mess. In other words, how we define
masculinity is too narrow.
Trapped by these impossible ideologies, it's no wonder that young men turn
to harmful influencers like Andrew Tate, Joe Rogan, and Jordan Peterson.
These carnival barkers hock their version of masculinity as magical elixirs.
Or, even worse, they frame masculinity as aggression, risk-taking, violence,
and sexism.
Many of my friends shrugged off the question and gave evasive replies about
being gainfully employed and wearing clean underwear. But some of my
friends are deep thinkers.
Julius is such a man — a mass of paradoxes that would confuse most women.
He is artistic, poetic, sensitive, and composed. Silent at moments. Talkative
at others. He is what women would call the "dark and mysterious" type.
Julius also served in Iraq. Today, he is a suicide survivor who battles PTSD.
Julius smiles an insouciant grin when I ask him how he defines being a good
provider and replies;
“Men play this game of appearing confident, headstrong, and apathetic, while
women must appear the opposite — demure, vulnerable, and empathetic. It’s
ridiculous that society accepted this sexist way of thinking even though everyone
states on their dating profile…. ‘I’m looking for an honest, caring, intelligent
man’… these are qualities that we see in women, not in men, and yet the hypocrisy
lives on.”
Sadly, many men do not survive this hypocrisy. But if we don't teach our sons
that there is more than one way to be a good man, some may choose to be
bad men. Others will harm themselves.