A1: Whether people are getting smarter is a complex question.

The Flynn Effect shows

an increase in IQ scores over time, but it doesn't necessarily mean that people are
inherently more intelligent. It could be that people are better prepared for these tests
due to better education, test-taking strategies, or other environmental factors.
Furthermore, IQ tests may not fully capture all aspects of intelligence.
A2: I accept that a combination of factors could be explaining the Flynn Effect. Improved
education, greater familiarity with testing, and changes in family size could all contribute
to higher IQ scores. However, I think it's unlikely that genetics alone can explain this
trend, as it would not account for the same effect being observed across different
cultures and nations.
A3: The Flynn Effect could have both societal advantages and disadvantages. On the
positive side, higher IQ scores could lead to a more educated, innovative, and problem-
solving society. However, it could also lead to increased pressure to perform
academically, or to a widening gap between those who score well on IQ tests and those
who don't. Furthermore, if IQ tests are used to make important decisions (like job
placements or educational opportunities), the Flynn Effect could lead to unfair
advantages or disadvantages if not properly accounted for.