Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/319241364
CITATIONS READS
0 4,133
1 author:
1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by The History Files www.historyfiles.co.uk on 23 August 2017.
Features: British Isles Europe Middle East Africa Far East Prehistory King Lists: British Isles Europe Middle East Africa Far East Americas
Central Asia
A History of Indo-Europeans, Migrations and Language
by Edward Dawson, 17 October 2015
Those peoples who are now known as Indo-Europeans (IEs) were the most widely FOLLOWING PAGES:
ranging ethnic group in ancient times. Due to their existence on the steppes as cattle The Rise of the Turkic Peoples
and horse raising people, they were quite mobile - a characteristic which they shared RULERS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD:
with other steppe nomads such as the Turkic and Hunic peoples. Indo-Europeans
Indo-Iranians
Background Uralics
Tocharians
Indo-European is proposed to be a member of a much older macro family called Arzawans (West Luwians)
Nostratic. Kizzuwatnans (East Luwians)
Persians
This includes the Uralic, Altaic and Kartvelian languages, and with a lower probability India
also languages spoken in India, North Africa, and the Arabian peninsula. Kartvelian- Celts
speaking tribes would have been close neighbours to the original Indo-Europeans in the Germanics
Latins
Caucasian Mountains - the apparent difference between them would be that Kartvelian
Sakas
speakers stayed home in the mountains, while Indo-European speakers expanded.
Cimmerians
This expansion was almost certainly caused by the adoption of horse-drawn wagons by EXTERNAL LINKS:
the Indo-Europeans. This led to led to the use of chariots in war, and finally to riding The United Sites of Indo-Europeans
horses for various purposes. Proto-Bulgarian Runic Inscriptions
Studies in the History and Language of
There are various theories about the precise location of their original homeland. A the Sarmatians
personal leaning is for the most probable theory, that they were originally located Linguistics Research Center, University of
Texas at Austin
somewhere on the northern edge of the Caucasus Mountains. These form a range of
Indo-European Chronology - Countries
peaks that sits between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea and which today is largely
and Peoples
within the borders of Georgia and the southern tip of Russia. The IEs then expanded Indo-European Etymological Dictionary (J
out from there, most of them going north into the steppes. Pokorny)
RELATED LINKS:
Maps of Indo-European Progression in
Central Asia
Indo-European Daughter Languages:
Anatolian
Map of proto-Anatolian migration
c.3000-2000 BC
Map 1: The northern edge of the Caucuses Mountains between the Black Sea and the
Caspian Sea is the most probable homeland for the proto-Indo-Europeans, cut off as
they would have been from their fellow Eurasiatic speakers (click on image to see full
sized)
Migrations
A full timeline of events can be seen in the accompanying list (see link in the sidebar,
right). But a brief recap here would be useful. The separation of the proto-
Indo-European (PIE) language from its parent Nostratic tongue took place
approximately at the 6000 BC mark (see the first map, above).
One can speculate that this occurred via isolation in a mountainous region (hence
favouring the Caucuses Mountains as a homeland). This would be prior to the 'Kurgan
Hypothesis' homeland. [1]
1 of 5
These early Indo-Europeans were identified by scholars with warrior pastoralists who
built kurgan (burial mounds - a Turkic loan word in Russian which is often used to
identify the Indo-Europeans prior to their expansion) in the steppes to the north of the
Black Sea and Caspian Sea in what is now southern Russia and Ukraine.
However, the core of this particular study focuses on the expansion as shown by
language shifts rather than other means.
Map 2: The initial expansion of Indo-Europeans took place around 4000 BC, with one
group heading southwards, while the main body expanded into the Pontic-Caspian
steppe, a vast stretch of plains to the north of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea (click on
image to see full sized)
South IEs
The Anatolian branch of Indo-European language appears to have separated from the
rest around 3500 BC; it retained many archaic features which were lost among the
other branches of Indo-European, indicating a clear separation between the two
branches at this time (south and north).
The ancestor tongue of Hatti (Hittite), Luwian (many sub-branches), Lydian, and Palaic
migrated from the Indo-European homeland and moved south through the mountains.
Eventually it reached the highlands of the Anatolian peninsula. From there the Hatti
speakers (Hittites) manage to form an empire that encompassed most of Anatolia
(although they were much later in establishing themselves than the Luwian-speakers).
Around 3000 BC, the remaining Indo-Europeans (now excluding the Anatolian branch)
probably began the process of separating into definite proto languages which were not
intelligible to each other. A western group would evolve into the Celtic, Italic, Venetic,
Illyrian, Ligurian, Vindelician/Liburnian and Raetic branches.
Map 3: The Indo-Europeans of the Pontic-Caspian steppe began to migrate out of their
core territory around 3000 BC, while those who remained behind - the East IEs -
eventually integrated themselves into the Oxus Civilisation and probably then supplied
the Aryans of India and Iran (click on image to see full sized)
Early in this western group's expansion, one tribe apparently made a U-turn and
headed eastwards (which is easy enough to do when you are a steppe nomad!) to
evolve into the Tocharian branch of Indo-Europeans.
A north-western branch began the German ethnic group. A northern branch founded
what would become Baltic and Slavic peoples. Proto-Greeks formed a south-western
branch, probably along with Thracians, Dacians, and Phrygians, all of which seem to
have been related to the Armenians. An eastern, or 'stay at home' branch apparently
calling themselves Arya or something similar formed the ancestors of Indians, Kurds,
Iranians, Mannaeans, Medians, and related peoples.
There are two theories about the splitting of the proto-Indo-European language (PIE)
into divergent languages. One is the tree theory, which illustrates them separating like
the branches of a tree. The other is the wave theory, which indicates dialects in contact
2 of 5
influencing their neighbours. Both theories would seem to be correct to some degree.
In truth both would have happened depending on the degree of mutual contact and/or
isolation.
Furthermore, there is evidence that branches which split apart in the manner of the
tree model can adopt a linguistic trend or custom from each other. One of the most
glaring examples of this would be the shift from PIE's ancestral 'kw' sound to 'p' in both
Celtic and Italic tongues across a central area of Europe, something that was not
adopted by geographically-isolated Celts in Spain and Ireland, or those Italics to the
west of the Pennines.
Another is the satem/centum split. For convenience, and no other reason, the tree
model is used here. Whilst it is generally too simplistic for a complete explanation,
using a wave model would make the branches incoherent.
North-West IEs
The proto-Germans migrated into southern Scandinavia and the Jutland peninsula.
There appears to have been two conflicting groups of deities who were honoured by
early Indo-Europeans; these are best known by their Vedic names of Devas and
Asuras. Some cultures honoured both, but most chose one or the other as dominant
one. The proto-Germans seem to have chosen the Asuras as dominant, under their
dialectal variant 'Os', otherwise known as 'Aesir'.
West IEs
This language group dominated most of Europe in ancient times, and still does in
western Europe. Its member languages are Celtic, Italic, Venetic, Illyrian, Ligurian,
Vindelician/Liburnian, and Raetic branches. West Indo-Europeans are probably best These late Iron Age artefacts come from
known for their geographically wide-ranging group, the Celts, who in turn adopted a Lithuanian cremation burial -
Latin once they had been conquered by the Romans. descendants of North IEs
This group's most influential member language, however, is Latin, an Italic tongue that
was spread across Europe by the Roman empire. Celtic tribes have been associated
with Urnfield culture artefacts that began to appear around 1200 BC in central Europe,
with the later Hallstatt culture which started around 800 BC, and also with the La Tène
culture of around 450 BC.
Whilst these associations are not doubted here, readers should be cautious about
merely accepting these defining labels. Celtic-speaking tribes were not limited to the
regions within these material cultures and instead extended well beyond them. On the
other hand, the Hallstatt material culture was also found in the Illyrian area of eastern
Europe, showing a wide range of settlement.
Movement of this group appears to have been almost exactly west from the ancestral
homelands, with some bending of their path due to geography. A serious question
would be why they came west. Were they pushed by other nomads, and if so, who?
Peoples in the area might have been Iranian nomads or perhaps Thracians, such as the
Cimmerians who originated on the steppes before moving south into Iran and Anatolia.
West-South-West IEs
South-West IEs
This language group seems to include both Greeks and Armenians; whether they split
off from a more recent common ancestor than PIE, or were in close contact is
debatable.
Also in this area were the Thracians, but their origin is even more debatable because
they appear to have spoken a satem language rather than the centum one of their
neighbours. A tidy assignment of their origin is impossible due to the uncertainty of
their history. Were they a West IE people, perhaps Italics or Illyrians, who were taken
over by an eastern, satem-speaking military elite, with their languages subsequently
fusing? Also tentatively placed in this group are Dacians and Phrygians.
South IEs
These are the Anatolian languages, the first to split off from PIE. The best known is The 'Mask of Agamemnon' was so
Hittite, which also included Luwian, Palaic, Lydian, and Lycian. This is the group that named by Heinrich Schliemann, perhaps
appears to have abandoned the steppes at the earliest date, and yet historical records optimistically, but this is a prime example
of Mycenaean work - descendants of
indicate that they had the same highly mobile horse-borne habits as the other
South-West IEs
Indo-Europeans. They fought from chariots and attacked south from Anatolia into
Mesopotamia and Egypt.
3 of 5
Easternmost IEs
The Tocharians appear to have a very odd history. Their language shows elements of
both eastern and western influences, which raises the question of whether they began
as a Western IE group (or a conquering core of Western IE warriors) that went
eastwards and either assimilated another tribe or other tribes, or were in heavy
contact with them. A case could even be made for them being an Anatolian language
group or being in heavy contact with the Anatolian group.
So this gives us two possibilities: either the satem (eastern) pronunciation was adopted
in the old homeland of Indo-Europeans after the mass departure of peoples to the west
into Europe who became Celts and Germans, and to the far east by the proto-
Tocharians; or the centum/satem split is a west/east split and the west-speaking
Tocharians performed a u-turn.
The former seems to be the prevailing argument currently. However, the latter is
favoured here because Anatolian was the first group to detach itself from the main core
of Indo-Europeans and this seems to be a satem group.
This would mean that PIE was originally satem. What is certain is that Tocharians did
borrow heavily from other languages because we find Sanskrit words they adopted due
to their Buddhist religion. Could Tocharian be heavily hybridised in the manner of
English with its large French vocabulary, and religious-adopted Latin vocabulary?
This group is perhaps the least studied in all [of the] Indo-European macro-family. It
consists of two dead languages, Tocharian A (or Agnean) and Tocharian B (or Kuchanian),
spoken in the first millennium AD in East Turkestan, in several [oases in which]
inscriptions and texts written in [these languages] were found.
The [routes and methods used in] Tocharic migrations from [the] Middle East to East Asia
are still unknown. The languages show many borrowings from early Iranian languages,
archaic Finno-Ugric, and even Tibetan-like forms, but the structure itself shows much
similarity first of all with Germanic and Balto-Slavic languages. Linguists think Tocharians
moved through Central Asia from west to east and, on their way, had many linguistic
contacts reflected in their tongue. Before these migrations, [it] being a dialect in [the]
proto-Indo-European community, Tocharians must have communicated closely with future
Anatolians and Italo-Celts. [4]
As nomads they were quite mobile, ranging as far as China in the east where they
were known as eastern Saka (Scythians), to Spain in the west where they were known
as Alans (the word is an altered form of Arya).
Some of these Alans accompanied the Vandals into North Africa, settling with them in
Tunisia. Their language fragmented into dialects just like all the others, but in this case
there is evidence of heavy contact with non-IE languages, particularly from other
nomads. There appears to have been heavy contact between Alans and proto-
Bulgarians. For instance, the ruler of the Alans bore the proto-Bulgarian (originally
Mongol language) title of 'khan' (see the link for Proto-Bulgarian Runic Inscriptions in
the sidebar).
As settled farmers, the Indian group moved into modern Pakistan and India; and the
settled Iranians moved into modern Iran, eastern Turkey and nearby areas.
One tribe, or dialect group seem actually to have stayed close to the original
homeland, and are today's Ossetians.
4 of 5
Professor Gennady Zdanovich has recently (2010) made fresh discoveries on the modern
Kazakhstan steppe of Bronze Age 'spiral' cities which exhibit many signs of having been
built and used by Indo-Europeans, having been built around 2000 BC
Bear in mind the fact that the timelines given above are conjectural in most cases; the
farther back in time one goes, the fewer written records can be used. By necessity the
estimates used above are rough - they may be right or they may be wrong - and in
either case exact dates seem impossible to prove beyond doubt.
What seems certain is that the Indo-Europeans started out as a numerically small
group, possibly or even probably in some sort of isolation, who then entered the
steppes and at some point became nomadic via horse-drawn wheeled vehicles. From
that action alone, the Indo-Europeans can be regarded as possibly the first militarily
aggressive nomadic people on the Eurasian continent, and certainly the first successful
one.
As such they had a terrible advantage over the isolated tribes and organised
civilisations that they encountered: they could appear out of apparently nowhere and
attack, and if they didn't win could simply roll away in their chariots and carts, out of
reach of sedentary peoples to attack again somewhere else or later at the same spot.
Not until other nomads such as Huns and Mongols developed and expanded was this
advantage duplicated. The Indo-Europeans had mixed success in Asia; but in Europe,
with no steppes, they took almost everything they encountered.
Online Sources
Proto-Bulgarian Runic Inscriptions:
http://www.kroraina.com/pb_lang/pbl_2_4.html
Studies in the History and Language of the Sarmatians:
http://www.kroraina.com/sarm/jh/jh3_4.html
Linguistics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin:
http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/general/IE.html
Indo-European Chronology - Countries and Peoples
http://tied.verbix.com/project/chron/chronn.html
Indo-European Etymological Dictionary (J Pokorny):
http://dnghu.org/indoeuropean.html
49
Find us on Facebook
Contact us Terms of use About Archives Help with King Lists Help Pages