Professional Documents
Culture Documents
r.aguilera@curtin.edu.au
100
• Short run vs long run
95
85
monthly history
Elasticity of oil demand 80 monthly forecast
annual average
• How responsive is demand to price changes? 75
70
Intensity of oil use 65
2019 2020 2021 2022
Interactive time
Source: US EIA Short-term Energy Outlook, July 2021
• Session Q&A
• Case study: Unprecedented demand shock from COVID
Recent price developments
80
Averages (USD)
60
2018: ~65-70
$/barrel
2019: ~60-65
40
2020: ~35-45
Negative WTI Brent
20
2021: ?? WTI
0
Jan 01, 2017
-40
Source: US Energy Information Administration (EIA) Statistics
Recent price developments
80
Averages (USD)
60
2018: ~65-70
$/barrel
2019: ~60-65
40
2020: ~35-45
Negative WTI Brent
20
2021: ?? WTI
0
Jan 01, 2017
-40
Source: US Energy Information Administration (EIA) Statistics
Background
Past consumption
led initially by
wood & biomass,
followed by coal
and then oil
Natural gas to
take over? Straight
to renewables?
Source: Aguilera and Aguilera, Society of Petroleum Engineers 110215-MS (2007); updated in Mineral Economics (2018)
Primary Energy Mix (2000 - 2150)
Natural gas
share peaks
near 2050
Non-fossil
energy leads
market 2H
21st century
30
25 Demand led
20 by emerging
15
mboe / d
Asia
10
5
0 Renewables
-5 are fastest
-10 growing
-15
Oil Coal Gas Nuclear Hydro Biomass Other
renewables
OECD Non-OECD Total
Source: International
Energy Agency (2021),
Net Zero by 2050
1.0E+05
well with actual data
(red points 2007-2019)
8.0E+04
Source: Aguilera and Aguilera, SPE 110215-MS (2007); updated in Mineral Economics (2018)
Historical & future oil consumption
BP statistical data GEM Reference forecast
GEM Sensitivity 1 GEM Sensitivity 2 Oil use growing
BP (2020), data since 2007 steadily since 1960
WORLD OIL CONSUMPTION, PAST & FORECAST 2030
1.2E+05 Forecast compares
THOUSAND BPD
1.0E+05
well with actual data
(red points 2007-2019)
8.0E+04
Source: Aguilera and Aguilera, SPE 110215-MS (2007); updated in Mineral Economics (2018)
“Peak” demand prospects
China
100,000
India
Japan
Thousand b/d
60,000
Russian Federation
South Korea
40,000
Brazil
Canada 20,000
Germany
0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Thousand b/d North America S. & Cent. America Europe
CIS Middle East Africa
Asia Pacific
Consumer preferences
102
mb/d
101
100
2018
99
2019
98
Jan
Aug
Sep
Nov
Dec
Apr
Oct
Mar
May
Jun
Jul
Feb
Quantity of oil - -
demanded
+ + +/- +/-
Qd = f (Y)
+
Use historical sample data of Y and Qd
to determine effect of Y on Qd
Can then be used for forecasting
Qd = β0 + β1Y
When Y ↑ by 1 unit, Qd ↑ by β1 units (or when Y ↓ by 1 unit, Qd ↓ by β1 units)
Oil demand function – Income
When GDP ↑ by 1%, oil demand ↑ by β2%
Qd = f (Po, …)
-
Qd = f (Psb, Pcm)
+ -
Demand function – Qd = f (Psb, Pcm)
prices of substitutes & complements + -
8 1.2E+15
btu
6 1E+15
8E+14
4
6E+14
2
4E+14
- 2E+14
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Source: US EIA Statistics
Oil demand function – technological change
Qd = f (Tech)
+/-
Qd = f (Govt)
+/-
P Change in any
($/bbl) determinant other than
D (decrease)← oil price (e.g. GDP ↑ or
GDP ↓) causes shift
P
Change in oil price
=> movement along curve
Change in other determinants
=> shift of curve
D D (increase)→
Q Q Q Q (bbl/yr)
Oil demand curves – different periods
Long run
Long run (flatter curve)
Short run
Sufficient time to switch to alternatives,
improve efficiency
Q (bbl/yr)
• Price changes have greater effect on quantity of
oil demanded
Demand curves – short run
P
Short-run example: ($/l)
Petrol for road transport
P2
Steep demand curve
• Insufficient time to find substitute
P1
• Difficult to adjust lifestyle
Q2 Q1 Q (l/yr)
Demand elasticities – price
% 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞
𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑 =
% 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝
P
($/bbl)
Sensitivity (responsiveness) of oil
demand to price changes
Elastic
Oil price elasticity of demand: % change in
demand caused by 1% change in price
Inelastic
Between 0 and 1 is inelastic
>1 is elastic Q (bbl/yr)
Demand & price move in opposite directions
(so elasticity is %↓ in demand caused by 1%↑ in price,
or %↑ in demand cause by 1%↓ in price)
Price elasticity: Long run > short run (takes time to alter oil usage)
Demand elasticities – income
% 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞𝑞
𝐸𝐸𝑑𝑑 =
% 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
GDP
Peak
Sensitivity (responsiveness) of oil demand
to income; e.g. business cycle
3.3 2.8
Percent
Growing US-China trade tensions 2
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
COVID slows economic activity
Source: International Monetary Fund statistics
GDP growth 2010-2020
World GDP Growth vs. Oil Demand Growth
6 6
Oil use rises & falls with GDP 4 4
2 2
Transportation (road, air, sea);
Percent
mb/d
industry (e.g. petrochemicals); and 0 0
-8 -8
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
GDP (left) Oil demand (right)
Figure shows
strong correlation
over the past
decades
Suggests income
elasticity ~1
Source: Citi Research (2020)
Intensity of oil use (IU)
𝑄𝑄𝑑𝑑
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = IU
𝑌𝑌
Industrialization
𝑄𝑄𝑑𝑑 IU
𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = (bbls per
𝑌𝑌 $ of
GDP)
600
80 200
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
5,000
0
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
5,000
Longer-term factors
Changes in the oil price itself
Prices of substitutes
Advances in technology
Consumer preferences
Government policies
Structural GDP trends
Questions?
r.aguilera@curtin.edu.au
Recent developments & short-term prospects
80
Upside
60
Speedy vaccine
rollout
$/barrel
40
Downside Brent
20
More COVID WTI
waves; climate
0
policies
Jan 01, 2018
-40
Source: US Energy Information Administration (EIA) Statistics
Case study: Unprecedented oil demand shock
Due to COVID, global % Real GDP Growth
9
economy contracted
6
-3.3% in 2020
3
Devastating, yet not as 0
bad as anticipated
-3
-6
Trade, transport, travel &
-9
industry ground to a halt,
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
middle- & light-distillate
fuel consumption dried up Advanced Emerging & developing World
Last year, it was thought a 2nd COVID Oil demand was then expected to
wave could cause double dip for GDP ‘double dip’ also
Case study: Unprecedented oil demand shock
Global oil demand, mb/d
Two lost years of GDP growth Oil demand follows same pattern
Oil demand 2019: 100.9 mbd World liquid fuels consumption Components of annual change
million barrels per day million barrels per day
Oil demand 2020: 92.3 mbd 105 10
world change forecast
↓8.6% 100
8 Organization of
Economic
Cooperation and 5.3
GDP 2020: ↓3.3% 95
6
Development (OECD)
3.7
4 non-OECD
If we assume income elasticity 90 2 0.8
=1, GDP 2020 figure results in
↓3.3% oil demand 85 monthly history 0
monthly forecast
-2
But oil demand fell by more 80 annual average
than GDP -4
75
-6
Thus, other factors at play
70
-8
Government restrictions: -8.6
65 -10
2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 2020 2021 2022
• Shut down transport systems;
• Stay home –
no driving, no flying... Source: US EIA Short-term Energy Outlook, July 2021
Case study: Unprecedented oil demand shock
Oil demand 2020:
World liquid fuels consumption Components of annual change
92.3 mbd million barrels per day million barrels per day
105 10
world change forecast
Oil demand 2021 100
8 Organization of
Economic
6 Cooperation and 5.3
forecast: 97.6 mbd 95 Development (OECD)
3.7
4 non-OECD
↑5.7% 90 2 0.8
85 monthly history 0
GDP 2021 monthly forecast
-2
80
forecast: ↑6.0%
annual average
-4
75
-6
If we assume income 70
-8
-8.6
elasticity =1, GDP 65 -10
2019 2020 2021 2022 2019 2020 2021 2022
2021 forecast results
in ↑6.0% oil demand Source: US EIA Short-term Energy Outlook, July 2021
Case study: Unprecedented oil demand shock
Sharp recovery in
2021, but then oil
demand slows
Pandemic forces
changes in behavior
(work at home, less
travel…)
Highlights uncertainty
of the time