Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/346130318
Hydroponics – A Review
Article in International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · August 2020
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.908.206
CITATIONS READS
34 25,346
9 authors, including:
Abbas Naikoo
Govt. Motilal Vigyan Mahavidyalaya, Bhopal
3 PUBLICATIONS 45 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Abbas Naikoo on 21 March 2021.
Hydroponics – A Review
1
Division of Agronomy, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology
of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2
Dryland Agricultural Research Station, SKUAST-K, Jammu and Kashmir, India
3
Goverment degree college, Kulgam, Jammu and Kashmir, India
*Corresponding author
ABSTRACT
Soil based cultivation is now facing difficulties due to different man made reasons such as
Keywords industrialization and urbanization. Also, sudden natural disasters, climate change and
unrestricted utilization of chemicals for agriculture purposes cause the depletion of soil
Hydroponics, fertility and quality. That is why, scientists have developed a new alternative approach for
Industrialization,
cultivation system namely soil-less cultivation or hydroponics. Hydroponics is a method of
Eco-friendly, Soil
fertility, Nutrient growing plants in a water based, nutrient rich solution. Through hydroponics a large
rich solution number of plants and crops or vegetables can be grown. The quality of yield, taste and
nutritive value of end products produced through hydroponically is generally higher than
Article Info the natural soil based cultivation. This cultivation is cost effective, disease free, eco-
friendly and is gaining popularity all over the world, in both the developed and the
Accepted: developing countries. It has a great prospect in many countries along with high space
18 July 2020 research to fulfil the lack of arable land where proper cultivable land is not available. So,
Available Online: hydroponics would be a better technique to produce the different kinds of fruits, vegetables
10 August 2020 and fodder as well as meet the global nutrition demand with making advance future. In the
future, hydroponics could be emerging techniques for the supplying of food to the world
wide population.
1779
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
France, the Netherlands, and Spain are the can be seen in lettuce, the most
three top producers, followed by the United hydroponically cultivated crop in the world,
States of America and Asia-Pacific region. in which about 99% of their hydroponic
These systems are becoming increasingly leaves are valid and they can be sold to a
widespread over the world, and according to value approximately of 40% more expensive
the most recent report (Jensen and Collins, than a lettuce grown traditionally (Barbosa et
1985), it is expected to reach a world growth al., 2015). Moreover, with hydroponics, there
of 18.8% from 2017 to 2023, corresponding is a better opportunity to place the fresh
to a global hydroponic market USD 490.50 produces in the market since their average
Million by 2023.According to growers nutritional quality and consumer’s acceptance
continuous production is possible only are higher (Mehra et al., 2017). In addition,
through hydroponic systems i.e, production growers reported that with hydroponics, some
round the year and in a short growing period, of the negative impacts of conventional
requires less space, and plants can be agriculture are avoided including high and
produced anywhere, i.e., in a small spaces inefficient use of water, large land
with a controlled growth environment requirements, high concentrations of nutrients
(Hughes, 2017). Growers often reply that and pesticides, and soil degradation
hydroponics always allows them to have accompanied by erosion (Treftz and Omaye,
higher productivities and yields without any 2016; Horrigan et al., 2002). Worldwide
constrains of climate and weather conditions consumers are increasingly interested in
(Sarah, 2017). In addition, growers often having more environment-friendly fresh
claimed that quality of hydroponic produces vegetables due to the strong and well-
is superior because it uses a highly controlled established inverse relationship between
environment and enables a more vegetable consumption and the risk of many
homogeneous production without any loss of types of chronic and degenerative diseases
water and nutrients. Moreover, hydroponics is like cancer, cardiovascular, and neurological
not dependent on seasonality, and therefore, disorders (Kris et al., 2002). Due to this
their productivities are higher and increasing consumer interest, the content of
homogenous throughout the year (Okemwa, health-promoting compounds is becoming a
2015). Growers also often report that vital consideration for fruit and vegetable
hydroponic productions are easier, and since growers. These beneficial compounds can be
they do not require cultural operations such as influenced by several key factors including
ploughing, weeding, soil fertilization, and environmental conditions (light, temperature,
crop rotation, they are light and clean humidity, atmospheric CO2). Contrary to the
(Nguyen et al., 2016). conventional agricultural system, hydroponic
relies on the manipulation of nutrients, which
It is also necessary and effective to control according to different authors allows having
nutritional solutions and take daily produces with high accumulation of some
measurements of liquid nutrients to avoid beneficial nutrients (Sgherri et al., 2010;
excess salinization and control microbial Buchanan and Omaye, 2013) (Table 1).
diseases and pests to avoid any loss of
production (Barbosa et al., 2015). Hydroponics for vegetable and fruit
Nonetheless, growers often argue that this production
technique allows the possibility to grow
healthier food and helps in the reduction of Food security started to be more important as
wastes. An example of this waste reduction witnessed by higher demand of hygienic food
1780
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
than production. Global warming and climate Crops grown on soil-less or hydroponics
change like drought, heavy rain, flood, high culture
temperature, pests etc. cause many impacts on
plants. Determination of natural resource, soil It is practically feasible to grow any kinds of
fertility and quality of water induce vegetables, fruits, fodder or crops using this
hydroponic vegetable production more than technique. Flowers give a better bloom and
traditional soil grown. For certain crops such colour when grown hydroponically.
as temperate lettuce and herbs that are Hydroponics system might be automated, that
normally imported and for some other popular is why it is well controlled and better for end
food crops, farmers prefer hydroponic product collection. Several plants including
technique to conventional cultivation method vegetables, fruits, flowers, medicinal crops
(Wattanapreechanon and Sukprasert, 2016). can be grown using soil-less or hydroponics
culture (Sardare and Shraddha, 2013).
Quality improved by hydroponics
Fodder production under hydroponics
Consumption of Fruits and vegetables highly
decrease the rate of risk of many types of Growing of plants without soil but in water or
chronic disease in human (Giovannucci et al., nutrient solution in a greenhouse (hi-tech or
2002; Dorais et al., 2008). Several bioactive low cost devices) for a short duration(approx.
compounds or nutrients like beta-carotene, 7-8 days) is hydroponics fodder Production.
antioxidants present in the vegetables have In India, maize grain is preferred over other
beneficial effects for health status. So, it is cereal grains for hydroponics fodder
possible to increase the health promoting production. The hydroponics fodder has more
compounds and improve the quality of fruits health benefits due to its palatability, easily
and vegetables by using green technique such digestibility and nutritious. Hydroponics
as hydroponics. It is intensively used to fodder can be produced by the farmers for
control the environment and to avoid feeding their dairy animals using low cost
uncertainties in the water and nutrient status devices in those situations where conventional
of the soil in the protected agriculture. The green fodder cannot be grown successfully
controlled light and temperature can also (Ramteke et al., 2019).As per the 19th
change the nutritional quality of fruits and Livestock census 2012, the livestock
vegetables. population of the country is 529.70 million
including 199.08 million (37.59%) cattle,
A significant difference has been seen in 108.7 million (19.89%) buffaloes, 71.56
quality of yield between hydroponically and million (13.51%) sheep, 140.54 million
conventionally grown lettuces (Murphy et al., (26.54%) goats and 11.00 million Pigs. The
2011). The taste and acidity, carotenoids and growth rate during last 56 years (1951-2007)
vitamins in tomatoes were better in shows increasing trend in cattle (28.19%),
hydroponic systems (Gruda, 2009). It was buffaloes (142.72%), sheep (83.02%) and
found that thirty percent more yield of goat (197.76%) and the overall growth rate in
tomatoes in a mixture of 80% pumice + 10% livestock is 80.91% (GOI, 2012). The
perlite + 10% peat medium in comparison to increase in the livestock population along
the soil (Mastouri et al., 2005). Tomatoes with the intensive rearing system has resulted
grown hydroponically were considered softer in the increase demands for feeds and fodder
and tastier than the traditional cultivation. in the country.
1781
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
Table.1 Main types of hydroponic systems and their respective characteristics, according to
growers, farmers and researchers (Okemwa, 2015; Nguyen et al., 2016; Lopes et al., 2008)
1782
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
The feed scarcity has been the main limiting Farming at heights: Farming at heights
factor in improving the livestock productivity means that less space is used to generate a
(Brithal and Jha, 2005). The land allocation high amount of outputs. This is possible via
for cultivation of green fodder is limited to the fact that hydro farms extended vertically
only 5% of the gross cropped area; but at in even places such as marginal lands, inside
present, India would require a total 526, 855 warehouses, water scarce areas. This is not
and 56 million tons of dry matter, green possible with geoponics for obvious reasons
fodder and concentrates. The unavailability of and thus if comparing both the situations then
quality green fodder adversely affects the it can be evident that per cubic feet of
productive and reproductive efficiency of the hydroponics generates more output turning
livestock. The less availability of land, more out to be more profitable and fruitful
time for harvesting, more labour for (Goenka, 2018).
cultivation, non-availability of same quality
around the year, requirement of manure and Pesticide free: In geoponics, farmers
fertilizer; the uncertainty of rain fall, water generally use fertilizers and pesticides for
scarcity and natural calamities due to climate improving the crop quality that makes the
change are the major constraints for green produce un-organic, medicated and not of the
fodder production encountered by the best quality. In hydroponics, this problem
livestock farmers. Due to the above does not pop up. This is because there is no
constraints the hydroponics technology is need for the farmer to add any kind of
coming up as an alternative to grow fodder fertilizer to the nutrient-rich water the crop
for farm animals and is an effective solution extracts the required minerals, also it has been
for fodder scarcity and is a very promising proven that hydroponically greens are better
technology for sustainable livestock to taste. Thus, it is another aspect in which
production in different regions of india (Naik, hydroponics wins over geoponics (Goenka,
2012; Naik et al., 2013). 2018).
Advantages of hydroponics over the Better growth rate: If you give a plant
traditional farming method exactly what it needs and when it needs, the
plant is likely to grow as healthy as
Surplus and scarcity: With more and more genetically possible. In hydroponics, this is
urbanization, the already scarce land is getting exactly the case as it is very much possible to
scarcer. People are not getting an adequate create an artificial environment with the
amount of space to stay in the city. addition of a light or air conditioning in an
Additionally, as the population of cities is area enclosed between four walls. As the
increasing day by day the demand for food is environment created will be suited best
growing. Mike Segar from Reuters has even according to the different plant's needs, they
termed this as “People are hungry will give better results in terms of turning out
everywhere.” This clearly signifies the gap to be fresher, greener and tastier to eat
between the demand and supply for food and (Qureshi, 2017).
brings out the most important fact of
arranging for more food. In such an instance, Conservation of water: it requires just 2- 3
geoponics, i.e. farming with lots of lands does litres of water to produce one kg of lush green
not seem a viable option. Thus, to curb these fodder, as compared to 60-80 litres to
people are trying to shift to hydroponics with conventional system of fodder production.
the advantage of growing crops in a
comparatively smaller space.
1783
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
1784
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
lifestyle of people and enhance the economic Cuddeford, D. 1989. Hydroponic grass in
growth of a country. In India, the hydroponic Practice. Open Journal of Animal
industry is expected to grow exponentially in Science, 11 (5): 211-214.
near future. To encourage commercial Domingues, D.S., Takahashi, H.W., Camara,
hydroponic farm, it is important to develop C.A.P. and Nixdorf, S.L. 2012.
low cost hydroponic technologies that reduce Automated system developed to control
dependence on human labour and lower pH and concentration of nutrient
overall start up and operational costs. solution evaluated in hydroponic lettuce
production. Computers and Electronics
References in Agriculture, 84: 53-61.
Dorais, M., Ehret, D.L. and Papadopoulos,
Abdullah, A. 2001. Nutritive value of barley A.P. 2008. Tomato (Solanum
fodder grown in a hydroponics system. lycopersicum) Health Components from
Bakshi, M. P. S., Wadhwa, M., and Makkar, Seed to the Consumer. Phytochemistry
H. 2017. Hydroponic fodder production, Reviews, 7(2): 231-250.
a critical assessment. Broadening Douglas, J.S. 1975.Hydroponics. Bombay
horizons. Oxford: 1-3.
Barbosa, G.L., Gadelha, F.D.A., Kublik, N., Fazaeli, H., Golmoihammadi, H.A.,
Proctor, A., Reichelm, L., Weissinger, Tabatabayee, S.N. and Tabrizi, A. M.
E., Wohlleb, G.M. and Halden, R.U. 2012. Productivity and nutritive value
2015. Comparison of land, water, and of barley green fodder yield in
energy requirements of lettuce grown hydroponic system. World Applied
using hydroponic vs. conventional Sciences Journal, 16: 531-539.
agricultural methods. International Finney, P.L. 1982. Effect of germination on
Journal of Environmental Research and cereal and legume nutrient changes and
Public Health, 12:6879-6891. food or feed value. Recent Advances in
Bhise V., Chavan, J., Kadam, S. 1988. Effects Phytochemistry, 17: 229–305.
of malting on proximate composition Giovannucci, E., Rimm, E., Liu, Y.,
and in vitro protein and starch Stampfer, M. and Willet, W.A. 2002. A
digestibilities of grain sorghum. Journal Prospective Study of Tomato Products,
of Food Science and Technology,25: Lycopene, and Prostate Cancer Risk.
327-329. Journal of the National Cancer
Brithal, P.S. and Jha, A.K. 2005.Economic Institute, 94(5): 391-398.
losses due to various constraints in dairy Goenka, A.G. 2018. Hydroponics v/s
production in India. Indian Journal of Geoponics. International Journal of
Animal Sciences, 75(12): 1470-1475. Emerging Research and Development,
Buchanan, D. N. and Omaye, S.T. 2013. 1(5): 12-34.
Comparative study of ascorbic acid and GOI. 2012. Basic animal husbandry statistics.
tocopherol concentrations in hydroponic Department of Animal Husbandry,
and soil grown lettuces. Food and Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of
Nutrition Sciences, 4:1047-1053. Agriculture. 1-133.
Chung, T.Y., Nwokolo, E.N. and Sim, J.S. Gruda, N. 2009. Do Soil-less Culture Systems
1989. Compositional and digestibility Have an Influence on Product Quality
changes in sprouted barley and canola of Vegetables. Journal of Applied
seeds. Plant Foods for Human Botany and Food Quality, 82(2):141–
Nutrition, 39: 267-278. 147.
1785
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R.S. and Walker, P. Compost on Growing Media and
2002. How sustainable agriculture can Greenhouse Lettuce Yield. Acta
address the environmental and human Horticulturae, 697: 153–158.
health harms of industrial agriculture. Mehra, S., Leng, T.W., Yamashita, Y. 2017.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Are Singaporeans Ready for
110:445-456. Hydroponics.
Hughes, A.J. 2017. Hydroponic Growing Mehta, M.P. and Sharma, A. 2016.
Offers Advantages, but won’t replace Hydroponic fodder production
the soil. technology. Think Grain Think Feed, 2:
Hydroponic vegetable cultivation 12-13.
development for extension at Luk Phra Murphy, M. T., Zhang,F., Nakamura, Y. K.
Dabos Agricultural Training and and Omaye, S.T. 2011. Comparison
Development Center, Samut Prakan between Hydroponically and
province. Conventionally and Organically Grown
Jensen, M.H and Collins, W.L. 1985. Lettuces for Taste, Odour, Visual
Hydroponic vegetable production. Quality and Texture. Food and
Horticultural Reviews, 7: 483-558. Nutrition Sciences, 2: 124-127.
Kide, W., Desai, B. and Kumar, S. 2015. Naik, P.K. Hydroponics technology for
Nutritional improvement and economic fodder production. 2012. 18: 4.
value of hydroponically sprouted maize Naik, P.K., Dhuri, R.B., Karunakaran, M.,
fodder. Life Sciences International Swain, B.K. and Singh, N.P. 2014.
Research Journal, 2: 76-79. Effect of feeding hydroponics maize
Kreij, C.D., W. Voogt and R. Baas.1999. fodder on digestibility of nutrients and
Nutrient solutions and water quality for milk production in lactating cows.
soil-less cultures. Research Station for Indian Journal of Animal Science, 84:
Floriculture and Glasshouse 880–883.
Vegetables, 196. Naik, P.K., Gaikwad, S.P., Gupta, M.J.,
Kris-Etherton, P.M., Hecker, K.D., Dhuri, R.B., Dhumal, G.M. and Singh,
Bonanome,A., Coval, S.M., Binkoski, N.P. 2013. Low cost devices for
A.E., Hilpert, K.F., Griel, A.E. and hydroponics fodder production. Indian
Etherton, T.D. 2002. Bioactive Dairyman, 65: 68-72.
compounds in foods: Their role in the Naik, P.K., Swain, B.K. and Singh, N.P.
prevention of cardiovascular disease 2015. Production and utilization of
and cancer. The American Journal of hydroponics fodder. Indian Journal of
Medicine, 113:71-88. Animal Nutrition, 32: 1-9.
Lopes, D.L.G., Petter, M. S., Manfron, P., Nguyen, N.T., Mcinturf, S.A., Mendoza-
Borcioni, E., Muller, L., Dischkaln, D. cózatl, D.G. 2016. Hydroponics: A
A. A., Pereira, M. K. 2008. Consumo de versatile system to study nutrient
energia elétrica e produção de alface allocation and plant responses to
hidropônica com três intervalos entre nutrient availability and exposure to
irrigações. Ciência Rural. 38:815-818. toxic elements. Journal of Visualized
Maharana, L. and Koul, D.N. 2011. The Experiments, 10: 3791-54317.
emergence of Hydroponics. 55: 39-40. Nielsen, C.J., Ferrin, D.M. and Stanghellini,
Mastouri, F., Hassandokht, M. R. and M.E. 2006. Efficacy of biosurfactants in
Dehkaei, M.N.P. 2005. The Effect of the management of Phytophthora
Application of Agricultural Waste capsici on pepper in recirculating
1786
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1779-1787
Seerat Jan, Zahida Rashid, Tanveer Ahmad Ahngar, Sadaf Iqbal, M. Abbass Naikoo, Shabina
Majeed, Tauseef Ahmad Bhat, Razia Gul and Insha Nazir. 2020. Hydroponics – A Review.
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(08): 1779-1787. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.908.206
1787