Crafting a thesis is a formidable task that demands dedication, time, and a deep understanding of the

subject matter. Students pursuing an LLD thesis in Malta often find themselves grappling with the
complexity of this academic endeavor. The challenges involved in producing a high-quality thesis are
numerous, ranging from extensive research and critical analysis to the meticulous organization of
thoughts and ideas.

Writing a thesis requires not only academic proficiency but also the ability to synthesize information
coherently. The process involves delving into existing literature, conducting thorough research, and
presenting original insights that contribute to the field of study. The pressure to meet academic
standards and produce a document that adds value to the academic community can be overwhelming.

Given the intricacies of thesis writing, many students seek external assistance to ensure the success
of their academic pursuits. Amid the myriad of options available, one platform stands out—⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔. This service specializes in providing support to students tackling the challenges
of LLD theses in Malta. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
offers comprehensive assistance tailored to the unique requirements of each thesis.

By choosing ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, students can benefit from the expertise of professionals who
understand the nuances of LLD thesis writing. The service is committed to delivering top-notch
content that meets academic standards while alleviating the burden on students. From developing a
compelling thesis statement to ensuring the seamless flow of arguments, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
offers a holistic approach to thesis writing.

In conclusion, the journey of writing an LLD thesis in Malta is undoubtedly demanding. For those
navigating the complexities of this academic task, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ emerges as a reliable
companion, providing expert assistance and guidance. Trust in their services to enhance the quality of
your thesis and pave the way for academic success.
You can download the paper by clicking the button above. In my view we need a culture of bottom-
up participatory planning, which involves a wide spectrum of individuals and involves communities
in the creation and design of quality public open space. Registered Office: Standard House,
Birkirkara Hill, St. My aim was to determine their possible relationship and provide
recommendations to stimulate a rethinking of planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. There are
virtually no typographical errors and the referencing and appendices are exemplary. In 2005, he
obtained a Masters with Distinction in planning and urban design from University College London,
pursuing this area, professionally and academically, locally and overseas. Some people whose rights
have been cancelled believe that they should be able to rely on the property clause in section 25 of
the Constitution of 1996 to either have the legislation declared unconstitutional or to demand
compensation. The water use entitlement may be regarded as constitutional property because section
22(7) of the National Water Act prescribes the payment of compensation for the infringement of a
water use entitlement in certain circumstances. Significant changes were made to South Africa’s
water law in the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. It
implies that the water use entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as
constitutional property. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much confusion as
clarity before it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or
not. In the article it is investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in
property or has merely become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. Dr Zammit graduated in
2002 with first class honours from the University of Malta as an architect and civil engineer, and has
been practising since. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely,
please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. A water use entitlement existing in terms of the
act is a water use right like its predecessor. The mechanism involves that water use rights that were
unexercised in the two years before the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998 are not
defined as existing lawful water uses. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information
through the use of cookies. It is concluded that any water use entitlement is limited by constraints
found throughout the act. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement” to mean a right to
use water in terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued under the act. The
amount of the compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution.
This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence of the candidate's intellectual capabilities and
commitment and the thesis makes an important contribution to knowledge both in terms of our
understanding of planning in Malta, the role played by the development control process in delivering
urban design quality and the use of research tools to gain this understanding”. These constraints
developed because the concept of custodianship that underlies the concept of public trusteeship
involves that a holder of a water use entitlement is in the position of a caretaker when exercising his
water use entitlement. The Maltese planning system is currently experiencing very interesting times
because now is the time to emphasise quality in our built environment. Antoine Zammit, full-time
lecturer within the Department of Spatial Planning and Infrastructure at the University of Malta has
just been awarded a PhD with no corrections for his final thesis entitled Urban design quality
through development control: the case of Malta. It forms the foundation of the mechanism to make
water use rights available for the reform of the allocation of water use entitlements. In his thesis, Dr
Zammit takes Malta as a case study and questions the role of development control in delivering urban
design quality. “Authors have acknowledged the significance of this relationship, however, few
studies have tried to assess both sides of the story, focusing instead on the study of either the
planning process or final design outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. Too much is at stake and
we cannot afford to repeat some past mistakes. We also need to give more attention to our streets
and to the sustainable conservation and reuse of vacant dwellings,” concluded Dr Zammit. Section
25 of the Constitution of 1996 prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of property and states that property
may only be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to comp.
In 2005, he obtained a Masters with Distinction in planning and urban design from University
College London, pursuing this area, professionally and academically, locally and overseas. This is a
praise worthy study and clear evidence of the candidate's intellectual capabilities and commitment
and the thesis makes an important contribution to knowledge both in terms of our understanding of
planning in Malta, the role played by the development control process in delivering urban design
quality and the use of research tools to gain this understanding”. It is concluded that any water use
entitlement is limited by constraints found throughout the act. Section 25 of the Constitution of 1996
prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of property and states that property may only be expropriated for a
public purpose or in the public interest, subject to comp. Dr Zammit’s PhD, which was partly funded
by the Malta Government Scholarships Scheme, was primarily supervised by Professor Matthew
Carmona, an internationally-acclaimed and best-selling author in urban design and his examiners
were Professor John Punter from Cardiff University, one of the most eminent scholars in the field of
urban design and Professor TanerOc, editor of the Journal of Urban Design. The Maltese planning
system is currently experiencing very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality
in our built environment. Too much is at stake and we cannot afford to repeat some past mistakes.
Registered Office: Standard House, Birkirkara Hill, St. It implies that the water use entitlement,
limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as constitutional property. Antoine Zammit,
full-time lecturer within the Department of Spatial Planning and Infrastructure at the University of
Malta has just been awarded a PhD with no corrections for his final thesis entitled Urban design
quality through development control: the case of Malta. The mechanism involves that water use
rights that were unexercised in the two years before the promulgation of the National Water Act 36
of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses. Some people whose rights have been cancelled
believe that they should be able to rely on the property clause in section 25 of the Constitution of
1996 to either have the legislation declared unconstitutional or to demand compensation. To browse
Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade
your browser. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of
cookies. The intense residential development that characterised the past decades occurred at the
expense of broader qualitative considerations. These constraints developed because the concept of
custodianship that underlies the concept of public trusteeship involves that a holder of a water use
entitlement is in the position of a caretaker when exercising his water use entitlement. It forms the
foundation of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the reform of the allocation of
water use entitlements. Dr Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from the University of
Malta as an architect and civil engineer, and has been practising since. In the article it is investigated
whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in property or has merely become an
authorisation that may be revoked at will. My aim was to determine their possible relationship and
provide recommendations to stimulate a rethinking of planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. A water
use entitlement existing in terms of the act is a water use right like its predecessor. In my view we
need a culture of bottom-up participatory planning, which involves a wide spectrum of individuals
and involves communities in the creation and design of quality public open space. In terms of this
Act a Water Tribunal was created which ought to have enhanced water security and to have provided
a settled forum to adjudicate disputes and to assist in developing the jurisprudence of water law. The
amount of the compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution.
You can download the paper by clicking the button above. Significant changes were made to South
Africa’s water law in the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of
1998. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement” to mean a right to use water in terms
of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued under the act. Instead the Tribunal
appears to have created almost as much confusion as clarity before it was dissolved in much
uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or not. A water use entitlement must thus be
seen as more than a mere authorisation to use water.
My aim was to determine their possible relationship and provide recommendations to stimulate a
rethinking of planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. Registered Office: Standard House, Birkirkara
Hill, St. We also need to give more attention to our streets and to the sustainable conservation and
reuse of vacant dwellings,” concluded Dr Zammit. Too much is at stake and we cannot afford to
repeat some past mistakes. A water use entitlement existing in terms of the act is a water use right
like its predecessor. Significant changes were made to South Africa’s water law in the 1990s,
especially with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. In his thesis, Dr Zammit
takes Malta as a case study and questions the role of development control in delivering urban design
quality. “Authors have acknowledged the significance of this relationship, however, few studies have
tried to assess both sides of the story, focusing instead on the study of either the planning process or
final design outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. The mechanism involves that water use
rights that were unexercised in the two years before the promulgation of the National Water Act 36
of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses. By using our site, you agree to our collection
of information through the use of cookies. There are virtually no typographical errors and the
referencing and appendices are exemplary. Some people whose rights have been cancelled believe
that they should be able to rely on the property clause in section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 to
either have the legislation declared unconstitutional or to demand compensation. Section 25 of the
Constitution of 1996 prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of property and states that property may only
be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to comp. It forms the
foundation of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the reform of the allocation of
water use entitlements. These constraints developed because the concept of custodianship that
underlies the concept of public trusteeship involves that a holder of a water use entitlement is in the
position of a caretaker when exercising his water use entitlement. The Maltese planning system is
currently experiencing very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality in our
built environment. Antoine Zammit, full-time lecturer within the Department of Spatial Planning and
Infrastructure at the University of Malta has just been awarded a PhD with no corrections for his
final thesis entitled Urban design quality through development control: the case of Malta. In the
article it is investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in property or has
merely become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. The water use entitlement may be
regarded as constitutional property because section 22(7) of the National Water Act prescribes the
payment of compensation for the infringement of a water use entitlement in certain circumstances.
The amount of the compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the
constitution. It implies that the water use entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the
legislature as constitutional property. This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence of the
candidate's intellectual capabilities and commitment and the thesis makes an important contribution
to knowledge both in terms of our understanding of planning in Malta, the role played by the
development control process in delivering urban design quality and the use of research tools to gain
this understanding”. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement” to mean a right to use
water in terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued under the act. In my
view we need a culture of bottom-up participatory planning, which involves a wide spectrum of
individuals and involves communities in the creation and design of quality public open space. It is
concluded that any water use entitlement is limited by constraints found throughout the act. A water
use entitlement must thus be seen as more than a mere authorisation to use water. You can download
the paper by clicking the button above. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much
confusion as clarity before it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in
existence or not. Dr Zammit’s PhD, which was partly funded by the Malta Government Scholarships
Scheme, was primarily supervised by Professor Matthew Carmona, an internationally-acclaimed and
best-selling author in urban design and his examiners were Professor John Punter from Cardiff
University, one of the most eminent scholars in the field of urban design and Professor TanerOc,
editor of the Journal of Urban Design. Dr Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from
the University of Malta as an architect and civil engineer, and has been practising since.
The water use entitlement may be regarded as constitutional property because section 22(7) of the
National Water Act prescribes the payment of compensation for the infringement of a water use
entitlement in certain circumstances. Significant changes were made to South Africa’s water law in
the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. In his thesis, Dr
Zammit takes Malta as a case study and questions the role of development control in delivering urban
design quality. “Authors have acknowledged the significance of this relationship, however, few
studies have tried to assess both sides of the story, focusing instead on the study of either the
planning process or final design outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. It forms the foundation
of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the reform of the allocation of water use
entitlements. A water use entitlement existing in terms of the act is a water use right like its
predecessor. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much confusion as clarity before
it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or not. It implies
that the water use entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as constitutional
property. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement” to mean a right to use water in
terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued under the act. These constraints
developed because the concept of custodianship that underlies the concept of public trusteeship
involves that a holder of a water use entitlement is in the position of a caretaker when exercising his
water use entitlement. In terms of this Act a Water Tribunal was created which ought to have
enhanced water security and to have provided a settled forum to adjudicate disputes and to assist in
developing the jurisprudence of water law. Too much is at stake and we cannot afford to repeat some
past mistakes. In the article it is investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a
right in property or has merely become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. Registered
Office: Standard House, Birkirkara Hill, St. In my view we need a culture of bottom-up
participatory planning, which involves a wide spectrum of individuals and involves communities in
the creation and design of quality public open space. We also need to give more attention to our
streets and to the sustainable conservation and reuse of vacant dwellings,” concluded Dr Zammit.
You can download the paper by clicking the button above. The intense residential development that
characterised the past decades occurred at the expense of broader qualitative considerations. Some
people whose rights have been cancelled believe that they should be able to rely on the property
clause in section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 to either have the legislation declared
unconstitutional or to demand compensation. The amount of the compensation is to be determined in
accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution. In 2005, he obtained a Masters with Distinction in
planning and urban design from University College London, pursuing this area, professionally and
academically, locally and overseas. Antoine Zammit, full-time lecturer within the Department of
Spatial Planning and Infrastructure at the University of Malta has just been awarded a PhD with no
corrections for his final thesis entitled Urban design quality through development control: the case of
Malta. Dr Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from the University of Malta as an
architect and civil engineer, and has been practising since. Section 25 of the Constitution of 1996
prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of property and states that property may only be expropriated for a
public purpose or in the public interest, subject to comp. It is concluded that any water use
entitlement is limited by constraints found throughout the act. Dr Zammit’s PhD, which was partly
funded by the Malta Government Scholarships Scheme, was primarily supervised by Professor
Matthew Carmona, an internationally-acclaimed and best-selling author in urban design and his
examiners were Professor John Punter from Cardiff University, one of the most eminent scholars in
the field of urban design and Professor TanerOc, editor of the Journal of Urban Design. The
mechanism involves that water use rights that were unexercised in the two years before the
promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses.
This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence of the candidate's intellectual capabilities and
commitment and the thesis makes an important contribution to knowledge both in terms of our
understanding of planning in Malta, the role played by the development control process in delivering
urban design quality and the use of research tools to gain this understanding”. By using our site, you
agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. The Maltese planning system is
currently experiencing very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality in our built
environment.
Some people whose rights have been cancelled believe that they should be able to rely on the
property clause in section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 to either have the legislation declared
unconstitutional or to demand compensation. The Maltese planning system is currently experiencing
very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality in our built environment. Section
25 of the Constitution of 1996 prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of property and states that property
may only be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to comp. It implies
that the water use entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as constitutional
property. In his thesis, Dr Zammit takes Malta as a case study and questions the role of development
control in delivering urban design quality. “Authors have acknowledged the significance of this
relationship, however, few studies have tried to assess both sides of the story, focusing instead on the
study of either the planning process or final design outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. The
amount of the compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution.
There are virtually no typographical errors and the referencing and appendices are exemplary. It
forms the foundation of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the reform of the
allocation of water use entitlements. In terms of this Act a Water Tribunal was created which ought
to have enhanced water security and to have provided a settled forum to adjudicate disputes and to
assist in developing the jurisprudence of water law. This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence
of the candidate's intellectual capabilities and commitment and the thesis makes an important
contribution to knowledge both in terms of our understanding of planning in Malta, the role played
by the development control process in delivering urban design quality and the use of research tools to
gain this understanding”. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much confusion as
clarity before it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or
not. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few
seconds to upgrade your browser. You can download the paper by clicking the button above. In the
article it is investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in property or has
merely become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. Antoine Zammit, full-time lecturer
within the Department of Spatial Planning and Infrastructure at the University of Malta has just
been awarded a PhD with no corrections for his final thesis entitled Urban design quality through
development control: the case of Malta. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement” to
mean a right to use water in terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued
under the act. The intense residential development that characterised the past decades occurred at the
expense of broader qualitative considerations. The water use entitlement may be regarded as
constitutional property because section 22(7) of the National Water Act prescribes the payment of
compensation for the infringement of a water use entitlement in certain circumstances. Too much is
at stake and we cannot afford to repeat some past mistakes. By using our site, you agree to our
collection of information through the use of cookies. Dr Zammit’s PhD, which was partly funded by
the Malta Government Scholarships Scheme, was primarily supervised by Professor Matthew
Carmona, an internationally-acclaimed and best-selling author in urban design and his examiners
were Professor John Punter from Cardiff University, one of the most eminent scholars in the field of
urban design and Professor TanerOc, editor of the Journal of Urban Design. My aim was to
determine their possible relationship and provide recommendations to stimulate a rethinking of
planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. A water use entitlement must thus be seen as more than a
mere authorisation to use water. Registered Office: Standard House, Birkirkara Hill, St. The
mechanism involves that water use rights that were unexercised in the two years before the
promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses. Dr
Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from the University of Malta as an architect and
civil engineer, and has been practising since. We also need to give more attention to our streets and to
the sustainable conservation and reuse of vacant dwellings,” concluded Dr Zammit. A water use
entitlement existing in terms of the act is a water use right like its predecessor. In 2005, he obtained
a Masters with Distinction in planning and urban design from University College London, pursuing
this area, professionally and academically, locally and overseas.
Instead the Tribunal appears to have created almost as much confusion as clarity before it was
dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it would continue in existence or not. A water use
entitlement must thus be seen as more than a mere authorisation to use water. Registered Office:
Standard House, Birkirkara Hill, St. In my view we need a culture of bottom-up participatory
planning, which involves a wide spectrum of individuals and involves communities in the creation
and design of quality public open space. It is concluded that any water use entitlement is limited by
constraints found throughout the act. In his thesis, Dr Zammit takes Malta as a case study and
questions the role of development control in delivering urban design quality. “Authors have
acknowledged the significance of this relationship, however, few studies have tried to assess both
sides of the story, focusing instead on the study of either the planning process or final design
outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. In 2005, he obtained a Masters with Distinction in
planning and urban design from University College London, pursuing this area, professionally and
academically, locally and overseas. Some people whose rights have been cancelled believe that they
should be able to rely on the property clause in section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 to either have
the legislation declared unconstitutional or to demand compensation. The amount of the
compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution. In terms of
this Act a Water Tribunal was created which ought to have enhanced water security and to have
provided a settled forum to adjudicate disputes and to assist in developing the jurisprudence of
water law. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a
few seconds to upgrade your browser. You can download the paper by clicking the button above. The
mechanism involves that water use rights that were unexercised in the two years before the
promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses. Dr
Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from the University of Malta as an architect and
civil engineer, and has been practising since. The Maltese planning system is currently experiencing
very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality in our built environment. It
implies that the water use entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as
constitutional property. Section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of
property and states that property may only be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public
interest, subject to comp. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the
use of cookies. The intense residential development that characterised the past decades occurred at
the expense of broader qualitative considerations. These constraints developed because the concept
of custodianship that underlies the concept of public trusteeship involves that a holder of a water use
entitlement is in the position of a caretaker when exercising his water use entitlement. Significant
changes were made to South Africa’s water law in the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the
National Water Act 36 of 1998. Too much is at stake and we cannot afford to repeat some past
mistakes. This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence of the candidate's intellectual capabilities
and commitment and the thesis makes an important contribution to knowledge both in terms of our
understanding of planning in Malta, the role played by the development control process in delivering
urban design quality and the use of research tools to gain this understanding”. In the article it is
investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in property or has merely
become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. However, the National Water Act defines
“entitlement” to mean a right to use water in terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an
instrument issued under the act. My aim was to determine their possible relationship and provide
recommendations to stimulate a rethinking of planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. It forms the
foundation of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the reform of the allocation of
water use entitlements. There are virtually no typographical errors and the referencing and
appendices are exemplary. The water use entitlement may be regarded as constitutional property
because section 22(7) of the National Water Act prescribes the payment of compensation for the
infringement of a water use entitlement in certain circumstances.
This is a praise worthy study and clear evidence of the candidate's intellectual capabilities and
commitment and the thesis makes an important contribution to knowledge both in terms of our
understanding of planning in Malta, the role played by the development control process in delivering
urban design quality and the use of research tools to gain this understanding”. The Maltese planning
system is currently experiencing very interesting times because now is the time to emphasise quality
in our built environment. Section 25 of the Constitution of 1996 prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of
property and states that property may only be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public
interest, subject to comp. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely,
please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. In his thesis, Dr Zammit takes Malta as a case
study and questions the role of development control in delivering urban design quality. “Authors
have acknowledged the significance of this relationship, however, few studies have tried to assess
both sides of the story, focusing instead on the study of either the planning process or final design
outcome in isolation,” explains Dr Zammit. However, the National Water Act defines “entitlement”
to mean a right to use water in terms of any provision of the act or in terms of an instrument issued
under the act. Registered Office: Standard House, Birkirkara Hill, St. The amount of the
compensation is to be determined in accordance with section 25(3) of the constitution. In the article
it is investigated whether the entitlement to use water has remained a right in property or has merely
become an authorisation that may be revoked at will. In terms of this Act a Water Tribunal was
created which ought to have enhanced water security and to have provided a settled forum to
adjudicate disputes and to assist in developing the jurisprudence of water law. It is concluded that
any water use entitlement is limited by constraints found throughout the act. We also need to give
more attention to our streets and to the sustainable conservation and reuse of vacant dwellings,”
concluded Dr Zammit. There are virtually no typographical errors and the referencing and
appendices are exemplary. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the
use of cookies. Dr Zammit graduated in 2002 with first class honours from the University of Malta
as an architect and civil engineer, and has been practising since. It implies that the water use
entitlement, limited as it is, has been recognised by the legislature as constitutional property. The
mechanism involves that water use rights that were unexercised in the two years before the
promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998 are not defined as existing lawful water uses.
Too much is at stake and we cannot afford to repeat some past mistakes. Dr Zammit’s PhD, which
was partly funded by the Malta Government Scholarships Scheme, was primarily supervised by
Professor Matthew Carmona, an internationally-acclaimed and best-selling author in urban design
and his examiners were Professor John Punter from Cardiff University, one of the most eminent
scholars in the field of urban design and Professor TanerOc, editor of the Journal of Urban Design.
In my view we need a culture of bottom-up participatory planning, which involves a wide spectrum
of individuals and involves communities in the creation and design of quality public open space. You
can download the paper by clicking the button above. Instead the Tribunal appears to have created
almost as much confusion as clarity before it was dissolved in much uncertainty over whether it
would continue in existence or not. My aim was to determine their possible relationship and provide
recommendations to stimulate a rethinking of planning practice,” added Dr Zammit. Significant
changes were made to South Africa’s water law in the 1990s, especially with the promulgation of the
National Water Act 36 of 1998. In 2005, he obtained a Masters with Distinction in planning and
urban design from University College London, pursuing this area, professionally and academically,
locally and overseas. A water use entitlement must thus be seen as more than a mere authorisation to
use water. It forms the foundation of the mechanism to make water use rights available for the
reform of the allocation of water use entitlements. These constraints developed because the concept
of custodianship that underlies the concept of public trusteeship involves that a holder of a water use
entitlement is in the position of a caretaker when exercising his water use entitlement. The water use
entitlement may be regarded as constitutional property because section 22(7) of the National Water
Act prescribes the payment of compensation for the infringement of a water use entitlement in
certain circumstances.