Title: Navigating the Complexity of Writing a Cuban Missile Crisis Thesis Paper

Embarking on the journey of writing a thesis paper on the Cuban Missile Crisis is akin to navigating
through a labyrinth of historical intricacies and geopolitical complexities. This pivotal event in
history, marked by the tense standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union, demands
meticulous research, critical analysis, and coherent argumentation. However, the daunting nature of
this task often leaves many students feeling overwhelmed and unsure of where to begin.

One of the primary challenges faced by students when writing a thesis on the Cuban Missile Crisis is
the sheer volume of information available. The event itself unfolded over a span of thirteen tense
days in October 1962, during which a series of clandestine actions, diplomatic maneuvers, and high-
stakes brinkmanship played out on the global stage. Navigating through this plethora of historical
data, primary sources, and scholarly interpretations requires a keen eye for detail and a discerning
mind to separate fact from conjecture.

Furthermore, crafting a compelling thesis statement that encapsulates the significance and
complexities of the Cuban Missile Crisis is no small feat. It requires a deep understanding of the
historical context, the underlying motivations of key players, and the broader implications of the
crisis on Cold War dynamics. Formulating a thesis that is both original and insightful requires hours
of contemplation and intellectual rigor.

Moreover, the process of conducting research for a Cuban Missile Crisis thesis paper can be arduous
and time-consuming. It involves scouring through countless books, scholarly articles, archival
documents, and multimedia sources to gather relevant information and evidence to support your
arguments. Analyzing and synthesizing this wealth of material into a coherent narrative that
advances your thesis requires patience, diligence, and meticulous attention to detail.

Given the challenges inherent in writing a thesis on the Cuban Missile Crisis, many students may
find themselves in need of expert assistance and guidance. That's where ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
comes in. With a team of experienced academic writers and researchers, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
offers custom thesis writing services tailored to your specific needs and requirements. Whether you
need assistance with topic selection, research methodology, or crafting a compelling argument, their
team of experts is here to help.

By entrusting your Cuban Missile Crisis thesis paper to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can rest assured
that you will receive a meticulously researched, well-written, and thoroughly documented paper that
meets the highest academic standards. Their commitment to excellence and dedication to customer
satisfaction ensure that you will receive a top-quality paper that is worthy of academic acclaim.

In conclusion, writing a thesis on the Cuban Missile Crisis is a challenging endeavor that requires a
comprehensive understanding of history, critical thinking skills, and the ability to communicate
complex ideas effectively. With the assistance of ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, however, this daunting
task can be made significantly more manageable. So why struggle alone when expert help is just a
click away? Order your Cuban Missile Crisis thesis paper from ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today and
take the first step towards academic success.
The 14,000 exiles landed at the Bay of Pigs and where annihilated by 20,000 Cuban troops with
more modern weapons. The invasion failed miserably and in the Communists eyes showed Kennedy
as a weak President who was not prepared. The Cold War was not a battle involving guns; in fact it
was more about power and competition between two groups. Many academics have aided and
abetted this unfortunate evolution of our misunderstanding of the crisis. Thank you for signing up for
The Nation ’s weekly newsletter. Nuclear weapons would surely be the method of warfare. In late
April 1962, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev conceived the idea of placing intermediate-range
missiles in Cuba. This shows that the President needed moral support, indicating that he was worried
about what the U2 photos showed. Hence, both powers played key roles prior and after the Cuban
Missile Crisis however, Kennedy and America superficially came out the crisis better whereas in
contrast to Soviet Premiere Khrushchev; things didn’t seem to come out with the result what he
exactly wanted. The Russians were not willing to fight to uphold it and could meet USA’s spending
on nuclear weapons. It is now known that there were 9 short, and 36 medium range nuclear missiles
all armed and ready in Cuba. An argument for Soviet victory is that Castro was still in power after
the crisis. It talks of how the crisis was a Soviet success as there was never a direct confrontation.
Hershberg and part of it was translated into English by Julio B. In this way, due to his ignorance of
Washington and the absolute certainty with which he held his convictions, Castro’s behavior during
the 18 months before the missile crisis raised the odds sky-high of exactly the catastrophe he
wrongly assumed was inevitable. If the same quality or size of the premises relate to the cover letter
explaining the switches: First we then sat under the title of a long and illustrious career of public
school began to give the impression that you are truly represented, then the economy have on angelo
imposed the office; who may be surprised by the economic model. U-2 surveillance plane flying over
the island, resulting in the first, and only, death of the. F. Kennedy coincide to the American people
and the evolution of fear throughout the. Cuba. Regardless, Americans did not find Cuba to be an
area of concern, especially to the. Then in April 1961, 1400 Cuban exiles trained by the CIA invaded
Cuba at the Bay of Pigs invasion. Naturally we would hope matter could be handled by Brazilians
with greatest discretion. In all, 162 nuclear warheads were shipped, delivered, stored, and made
ready to fire by Soviet technicians in Cuba. After a long pause, McNamara responded, “No, Mr.
President. We were absolutely not interested in invading Cuba. This treaty was to slow down or even
stop the arms race which made the superpowers relations better. Decades of living in a hyper
paranoid state where every day was potentially the last were ultimately rewarded by the end of the
Cold ar without a single shot ever having been fired. Several other polls conducted by NORC give
further evidence that the daily. Did Communism threaten America's internal security after World War
2. Kennedy and Premier Nikita Khrushchev, war was averted. Arthur Lundahl, the key direction of
the operation. The blockade would hopefully mean no more missiles could get into Cuba, unless the
USSR decided to break the blockade with force, or by retaliating in Berlin, a sensitive area for both
Khrushchev and Kennedy.
Doves believed that negotiations held during a blockade could lead to the removal of the nuclear
threat in Cuba. The two sites I found the most interesting are 14 Days in October and The Cuban
Missile Crisis. The materials include papers, memorandums, correspondence, reports, notes, doodles,
hand written material, accounts of Executive Committee meetings, and notes on private meetings
with President Kennedy. Even though pre-determined plans were in place for a. However Robert
Kennedy's special relationship as both the brother of and special advisor to President Kennedy made
him the closest man to JFK during the Cuban Missile Crisis. First: that talk about “the end of the
world as we know it” was and is just hyperbole. Small, independent countries that feel cornered by
big powers cannot afford to bluff. At 8:00 A.M. on October 16th, McGeorge Bundy approached the
President of the. In the poll comparing common concerns in the spring of 1962 to the Cuban. What
other scholarly work fails to accomplish is reflecting on fear during the. This is a biased view, as a
US historian wrote the source. This is because the writer was an important minister at the time, and it
was published in the same year that communist control was collapsing in Russia. Others who deny
the danger of the crisis simply feel a lack of urgency about the nuclear threat then, and now.
However there would definitely be a Soviet response which could involve protecting Cuba or taking
over Berlin. Franqui. Upon hearing the news, Castro grew furious. Both sources take the view that
their own country won the crisis, although the truth is somewhere between what the two sources
said. 5ii. Source 1 states that Kennedy and the US 'won' the Cuban Missile Crisis, and effectively
beat the USSR. Despite the fact that Batista was about as crooked a character as was around at the
time, the US took it as a personal insult that communism had taken hold just 90 miles from its
borders. Thanks to the bravery of two men, President John F. During this crisis US imposed the
Naval blockade in Cuban waters and US did not allowed any ship to passed through the blocked
without being checked by US Navy. Here is what he told McNamara at the 1992 Havana conference.
The primary source for the disharmony was the ideologies ingrained within either side. Both leaders
were keen to avoid conflict, as it would be costly, impractical and unpopular, yet neither leader
wanted to back. ExComm and their negotiations with the Soviets, it becomes more and more evident
just. Are you absolutely certain that Israel will never feel so threatened by an Islamic neighbor (or
neighbors) that it will launch a preemptive nuclear attack. The policy of containment had been shown
not to be working, thus proved a failure when the thousand paratroopers where massacred by the
guerrilla army at the Bay of Pigs. Frankly the software is less than what most hardcore gamblers
would expect. He worried about a Russian move against West Berlin. Dobbs, and the complexity of
the events missing from George, and effectively combine. A few days later a U-2 is shot down and
another is seen in Soviet airspace. George, Alice L. Awaiting Armageddon: How Americans Faced
the Cuban Missile.
The charge was meant to signal the submarine to come up but instead hit the vessel. Thank you for
signing up for The Nation ’s weekly newsletter. What other scholarly work fails to accomplish is
reflecting on fear during the. Whether it is losing family or the environmental impact, there were. As
a result it appeared to the world that Kennedy had. Before the Cuban Missile Crisis, there was an
evident lack of concern over the. As they spoke, the pupils in their eyes dilated, their voices cracked,
heavy with barely managed emotion. One option is for a direct meeting between Khrushchev and
President Kennedy. Every important foreign-policy decision Castro made in the 18 months
following the abortive, CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 was based on this
assumption: Cuba is toast; Kennedy must destroy us in order to preserve his political life; and any
attack by the United States against Cuba will involve the use of US nuclear weapons, because of
Kennedy’s desperation to destroy the Cuban regime. By the time of their deaths— McNamara in
July 2009, and Castro in November 2016—both men had become full-throated, take-no-prisoners
nuclear abolitionists, a view directly traceable to their pivotal exchange in Havana in January 1992.
However, as time went on, the fear of nuclear war quickly dissipated. When. Kennedy kept the
discovery under his hat and met with advisors for a few days. However, for Khrushchev personally,
this crisis did not go good. Even In that scenario United State of America used their maritime power
as vital weapon in order to counter the enemy threat. The major events in the Cuban Missile Crisis
presented are exceedingly significant when analyzing the strategic calculated costs and benefits of
the crisis that lead to a deterring end. Source E gives the reader the impression that the USSR was
the victim in the crisis, because the writer was the Soviet Foreign Minister at the time. Robert
McNamara later revealed, “We’d concluded that no. Franqui. Upon hearing the news, Castro grew
furious. As the thumb and forefinger nearly touch, a voice says, “We came that close to nuclear war
in the Cuban missile crisis.”. Such views not just manifestly untrue: Still worse, they are bullshit
because the assertions have nothing to do with the real Cuban missile crisis. For Kennedy too was
wary of starting war with the USSR. This pushed the relationship between the countries downhill,
until in January 1961, the USA broke of all diplomatic relations with Cuba. Then in April 1961, 1400
Cuban exiles trained by the CIA invaded Cuba at the Bay of Pigs invasion. In all, 162 nuclear
warheads were shipped, delivered, stored, and made ready to fire by Soviet technicians in Cuba. On
October 28th, 2962, Nikita Khrushchev announced that he decided to. This then backfired again as
when Castro waiting at the bay already and vastly outnumbering these exiles, defeated them and
stopped an invasion, he was shown to be a hero and made more popular in Cuba. While many surely
feared for their lives in this trying time. This collection also includes telegrams, cables, and reports
sent by the CIA, State Department, and FBI related to the Cuban Missile Crisis and its aftermath.
United States would not invade Cuba as a resolution to removing the missiles. Tensions. Normally
loquacious, McNamara was rendered temporarily speechless.
The good side of this is that it would show the USA were serious and put pressure on Khrushchev
and also the USA had a strong navy and could fall back on other options if necessary. However, it is
no secret that some, like President Kennedy and those close to him (and. Initially it was decided that
Vietnam would be occupied by Chinese and British troops and that they would supervise the
surrender of Japan. That’s the truth. You are here today because three leaders, and the rest of the
human race, got lucky in October 1962. In the end, Kennedy decided on a naval blockade of Cuba.
As CIA agents were caught and killed with the exiles in this attack at the Bay of Pigs, it was clear
that it was USA's hand behind this. George, on the other hand, goes into great detail about. And if
I’d been a bit more aware when I was two years old, I’d have been up all night, just like much of the
rest of the world was in 1962. If Castro had been crazy, the only lesson would be the common-sense
injunction—easy to state, less easy to implement—to try to keep crazy people from becoming
leaders of countries. In that same month, Gallup also polled the American. Mendelsohn grimly
stated, “I myself now accept the probability of a nuclear holocaust. The blockade did not destroy the
threat of the missiles on Cuba, but it did stop more from getting there. The blockade would hopefully
mean no more missiles could get into Cuba, unless the USSR decided to break the blockade with
force, or by retaliating in Berlin, a sensitive area for both Khrushchev and Kennedy. Missile Crisis
Concise ed. (New York: Norton, 2002), 45. However, it was proved to be a U-2 that simply drifted
off course. Authors who write on the Cuban Missile Crisis focus mostly on the big names. The clear
evidence missiles pointed at American cities and an estimated 80 million people shook the
government. There was an inadequate supply of shelters in major cities. The subject of the Cuban
Missile Crisis is one that has been researched and. Here is what he told McNamara at the 1992
Havana conference. The major events in the Cuban Missile Crisis presented are exceedingly
significant when analyzing the strategic calculated costs and benefits of the crisis that lead to a
deterring end. Robert McNamara later revealed, “We’d concluded that no. Crisis. While “fear” was
apparent and rampant during those thirteen days, such high. One option is for a direct meeting
between Khrushchev and President Kennedy. Gallup asked participants of a February 1965 survey if
they believed that in twenty years. Kennedy seemed weak because he could do nothing to stop the
building of the wall, despite his best efforts. It suggests that Cuba was another case of the
'containment' of communism, like the US did in Korea. The United States was not a victim of the
deployment; its threats to Cuba were an important cause of it. Lisagor highlights the negligence of
the American public and their fears during the Crisis. To many professors, the crisis is best
understood as a game, like some combination of chess and American football—an interesting game,
but in the end only a game, with no great relevance to us in the 21st century.
The USSR were seriously behind in the arms race and at that time only had missiles that could only
strike the west coast of America. However, for Khrushchev personally, this crisis did not go good.
Whether it is losing family or the environmental impact, there were. The USA could still destroy the
USSR so the Russians wouldn’t use their missiles. It also seems clear that they can only be operated
by Soviet Military, not Cubans. 2. Their presence raises grave issues of national security for the US
and the Western Hemisphere as a whole as the President and the Congress have made clear. Hence,
both powers played key roles prior and after the Cuban Missile Crisis however, Kennedy and
America superficially came out the crisis better whereas in contrast to Soviet Premiere Khrushchev;
things didn’t seem to come out with the result what he exactly wanted. In the Bay of Pigs some
landing craft were wrecked by the coral reefs; the initial CIA air strike failed to destroy all the
Cuban planes; contrary to intelligence reports the local population did not flock to support the
invasion; those troops not killed in the assault were quickly rounded up by the 20,000 strong Cuban
army. May and Philip D. Zelikow. In their most notable pieces of work6. If either of these scenarios
had materialized, a nuclear US counterattack would have followed immediately, killing millions of
Cubans and thousands of Russians on the island. ExComm and their negotiations with the Soviets, it
becomes more and more evident just. This meant that the United States was no longer threatened by
the possibility of missiles launched from Cuba. This made USA more suspicious of Castro's
intentions as his nationalizing of companies move was a very communist move and that now he was
trading with communists.USA once again overreacted to the situation by burning all the crops
bought by USSR from Cuba, which meant that if there was nothing to trade then they shouldn't trade
and no. Luckily, US intelligence discovered this provocative plan before its completion—in fact,
before any nuclear warheads had arrived in Cuba, rendering their delivery vehicles (missiles, planes,
and boats) useless. Reputations were already weakened after the events in Berlin, where both leaders
had come out worse after the building of the Berlin wall. Khrushchev had the nuclear weapons
removed from Cuba, and the missile installations were destroyed, in return for a US promise not to
invade Cuba and the ending of the blockade. Several other polls conducted by NORC give further
evidence that the daily. Nuclear war had been avoided, at least for the time. I’ve gotten over it since
then, perhaps to an excessive degree, but back then, it didn’t take much to fill me with fear. Are you
sure that India will never feel so apprehensive about China along the nations’ shared 2,170-mile
border that it resorts to its large and growing nuclear arsenal. Billions, however, will feel the impact,
as the world gets cold, crops fail, starvation is rampant, and the infrastructure of civilized life
unravels. They could pepper Europe, but most of the US mainland was out of their reach. This
formerly classified cable documents the work to establish back-channel negotiations with Cuba. The
fear was prominent, however, in a grand scheme, the thirteen days acted as simply an. This is because
the writer was an important minister at the time, and it was published in the same year that
communist control was collapsing in Russia. Readjusting the narrative of fear during the Cuban
Missile Crisis also allows for it. The Cuban Missile Crisis brought on a wave of concern and paranoia
for the. Each paragraph in the body of the essay should contain. On October 26, 1962, McNamara
imagined that such a US attack might be required within 24 hours, never dreaming that such an
action would have been the penultimate move toward a catastrophic nuclear war that would begin in
Cuba. The question has gained particular relevance in light of the international protests that consider
the Cuban Five as antiterrorists and not criminals. On October 16th 1962, it was made clear to the
President of the United States.
Union, led by Nikita Khrushchev, was able to deceive Kennedy and place missiles in. Cuban Missile
Crisis and comparing it to the entire duration of the Cold War. I find the. This treaty was to slow
down or even stop the arms race which made the superpowers relations better. Kennedy and
Khrushchev rightly ignored the ranting of Cuban leader Fidel Castro, since his views were irrelevant
to both the deployment and removal of the missiles. This is further shown by the fact that in 1963 a
teleprinter link was set up between Washington and Moscow, allowing for more direct and speedy
contact between the leaders of the US and the USSR. 5i. Source I talks about how Kennedy beat
Khrushchev in the crisis, although it does admit that the US removed its missiles from Turkey and
Italy three months later. Dobbs, and the complexity of the events missing from George, and
effectively combine. Both allowed their opponents to retreat without too much loss of face. It is
because of this that the source is of certain use. It is interesting to note that in a Gallup conducted
poll in February of 1963, 60%. However, those who he served for, the people of the. Listed under
Blockade are: Secretary of Defense Robert S. There was an inadequate supply of shelters in major
cities. To many professors, the crisis is best understood as a game, like some combination of chess
and American football—an interesting game, but in the end only a game, with no great relevance to
us in the 21st century. This would prevent Soviet ships, known to be carrying missiles, from reaching
Cuba. Are you willing to bet the fate of this planet that Pakistan, feeling that India has pushed its
back against the wall over Kashmir, will never go nuclear. However, while the American public
realized the threat that a nuclear war creates. The USA could still destroy the USSR so the Russians
wouldn’t use their missiles. This was retaliation for the US having missiles in Italy and Turkey, so
again both sides are to blame. On October 16th 1962, it was made clear to the President of the
United States. While many surely feared for their lives in this trying time. In this way, due to his
ignorance of Washington and the absolute certainty with which he held his convictions, Castro’s
behavior during the 18 months before the missile crisis raised the odds sky-high of exactly the
catastrophe he wrongly assumed was inevitable. Thank you for signing up for The Nation ’s weekly
newsletter. Henceforth the invention of Cruise and Pershing nuclear missiles and the SDI or Star
Wars was created in the USA. Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF
Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. This would have doubled the effectiveness
of a Soviet nuclear attack upon 1 USA but at limited expense. Letter to Fidel Castro from the
Department of State drafted at the beginning of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Meanwhile, the
atmosphere of the ExComm meeting planned for 11:10 a.m. had. When trying to measure “fear”, or
any emotion for that matter, one of the most. Kennedy, while acting in his role as an advisor to
President John F.