You are on page 1of 151

Editorial Team

Chief Editor: Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan


Assistant Chief Editor: Ida Busnetty
Editorial Assistant: Willy Arafah

Editorial Board Members

Ganeshan Wignaraja (Asian Development Bank Institute, Philippines)


Jack Qingjie Xia (Peking University, China)
Mark Goh (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Greg Barton (Monash University, Australia)
Kyosuke Kurita (Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan)
Toshiro Nishizawa (University of Tokyo, Japan)
Larry Strange (Cambodian Development Research Institute, Cambodia)
Lee Saw Hoon (Malaysia Productivity Corporation, Malaysia)
Muhammad Ikmal Mohd Said (Centre for Poverty and Development Studies, Malaysia)
Remy Herrera (University of Paris, France)
Savita Shankar (Keio university, Japan)
Siew Mee Barton (Deakin University, Australia)
Yau Jr (Economic Development Bureau, Taiwan)
Kriengkrai Techakanont (Thammasat University, Thailand)
Anna Bakiewicz (University of Social Sciences, Poland)
Colin C Williams (University of Sheffield, UK)
Tomoko Oikawa (University of Limeric, Ireland)
Michael Schaper (Curtin University, Australia)
Sampa Banerjee (WASME, India)

Associate Editors

Bogdan Piasecki (University of Social Sciences, Poland)


Anna Rogut (the National Centre for Research and Development, Poland)
Nataliya Chukhray (Lviv Polytechnic, Ukraine)
Marcela Rebeca Contreras (Universidad de Occidente, México)
John Chetro-Shivos (Clark University, USA)
Suriyani BT. Dato' HJ. Muhamad (UMT, Malaysia)
Fachru Nofrian (University of Indonesia, Indonesia)

Advisory Members

Thoby Mutis (University of Trisakti, Indonesia)


Roman Patora (University of Social Sciences, Poland)
Kar-yiu (University of Washington, USA)
Lukasz Sulkowski(University of Social Sciences, Poland)
Asep Hermawan (University of Trisakti, Indonesia)
Andrzej Marjanski (University of Social Science, Poland)
Yuswar Z. Basri (University of Trisakti, Indonesia)
Farida Jasfar (University of Trisakti, Indonesia)

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016),
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
i
Guidelines for Contributors
1. All manuscripts should be typed on one side of A4 (8.27" x 11.69") and be double-
spaced, 2 centimeter margin with Times New Roman font type and size 12.
2. The length of the manuscript is approximately 6000-7.000 words or approximately 15-
25 pages (A4 paper).
3. All manuscripts should be sent by email to: ttambunan56@yahoo.com
4. To assure anonymous review, authors should not identify themselves directly or
indirectly in their papers.
5. In sending a manuscript, it should have a cover page which includes the title of the
paper, the author's full name, title and affiliation, mailing address, phone and fax
number, email address, and any acknowledge.
6. Together with the manuscript, the author (s) should attach his/her (their) biography of
50 words.
7. All pages, including tables, figures, diagrams, appendices and references should be
serially numbered
8. Spell out numbers from one to ten, except when used in tables, figures and lists, and
when used with mathematical, statistical, scientific or technical units and quantities,
such as distances, weights and measures. For example: two days, one week, 20 years, 4
meters. All other numbers are expressed numerically.
The systematically writing should cover the followings:
1. Title: it should be specific and effective with maximum 150 characteristics
2. Abstract: maximum 200 words and should concisely inform the readers of the
manuscript's topic, its objectives, its methods and its main findings.
3. Keywords: at least four keywords in alphabetical way.
4. JEL classifications: at least two codes
5. Introduction: it should cover systematically the paper's background, motivation,
purposes, and method.
6. Theoretical Framework/Literature Review: the author (s) should explain theoretical
framework used or previous key similar studies/literature
7. Methods: the author (s) should explain analysis method used, including sources of data,
data collection approach, measurements, and operational variable definition (if any).
8. Results and Discussion: the author (s) should elaborate clearly main research finding(s).
If the author (s) used an econometric or a statistical approach in his/her (their)
research, in this part (section) of the paper, he/she (they) should prevented from "too
mechanic" in explaining/discussing the results. Instead, the author (s) should answer
the question that most likely to be asked by the readers: "what the findings mean in
reality?"

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016),
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
ii
9. Conclusion: it should contain key research findings, meaning of the findings and
suggestion for the future research (if any).
10. Appendices: if any, it should contain further information (which can be in the form of a
table or a figure or a list, or others) directly related to information or data given in the
paper in which the author (s) considered it also important for the readers.
11. References: only references cited in the paper, and they should be stated with the
following order: author surname, publication year, title of the paper, journal name and
its volume and page number. Or if it is a chapter of a book, it should be added with
surname of the book's editor, title of the book, page number, name of publisher, and city
of the publisher.

Some examples:

-Research/working paper:

Abeberese, A.B (2012), "Electricity Cost and Firm Performance: Evidence from India", research
paper, August, Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY
(https://www.dartmouth. edu/~neudc2012/docs/paper_292.pdf).

-Report:

Anh, L.H, Nguyen T. and Nguyen T.T.P. (2013), "The Inflationary Impacts of Fossil Fuel and
Electricity Price Reform in Viet Nam", report of the UNDP project Fossil Fuel Fiscal
Policies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Viet Nam – Phase II-Developing a Roadmap
for Fossil Fuel Fiscal Policy Reform, Hanoi.

-Journal:

Jamal, M. and A. Ayarkwa (2014), "Fuel Price Adjustments and Growth of SMEs in the New
Juaben Municipality, Ghana", International Journal of Small Business and
Entrepreneurship Research, 2(3): 13-22.

-Book:

Tambunan, T.T.H. (2009b), Development of SMEs in ASEAN Countries, Readworthy


Publications, Ltd, New Delhi

-Seminar paper:

Tambunan, T.T.H. (2014b), "Government efforts to improve community access to health care
and education: a story from Indonesia", paper presented at the Second International
Conference on Social Security", 3-5 December 2014, Social Security Research Centre
(SSRC) and the Department of Development Studies and Institutions and Economies,
Faculty of Economics and Administrations, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

-Book chapter:

Tambunan, T.T.H. (2014), "Ongoing trade facilitation improvement: Its impact on export-
oriented small and medium-sized enterprises in Indonesia", in Ravi Ratnayake, et al.
(eds), Impacts of trade facilitation measures on poverty and inclusive growth: Case
studies from Asia, UN-ESCAP and ARNeT, Bangkok.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016),
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
iii
Submission
Please send your abstract not more than 200 words or full
papers not more than 5000 words including references. With
title of the paper, name(s), e-mail address of the authors(s) and
organization name to

Tulus Tambunan

Editor International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises


and Business Sustainability

Email: ttambunan56@yahoo.com

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016),
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
iv
Content
i Editorial Team
ii Author’s Guidelines
iv Submission
1 - 23 Textile Industry as a Smart Specialization of Lodz and the Region
of Cataloni
Makary Piasecki

24 - 49 Taxation of Farming Enterprises in Poland and the European


Union - a Comparative Analysis
Elżbieta Klamut

50 - 66 Human Capital and Productivity in the Sinaloa Commercial Family


Businesses
Fabiola Ponce Durán
Marcela Rebeca Contreras Loera

67 - 77 Sustainable Waste Management and Social Capitals: The


Experience from Landfill Community in Coverting of Waste into
Alternative Energy, in Kendari South East Sulawesi
Patta Hindi Asis
Ririn Syariani

78 - 113 Resilience of Firms to Economic and Climate Shocks Initial Insights


from Philippine SMEs
Jamil Paolo Francisco
Ailyn Lau
Ronald U. Mendoza

114 - 142 Impacts of Energy Price Subsidy Reform on MSMEs and Their
Adjustment Strategies: a Story from Indonesia
Tulus T.H. Tambunan

143 About The Authors

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016),
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
v
Textile Industry as a Smart Specialization of Lodz
and the Region of Catalonia
Makary Piasecki
Department of Entrepreneurship and Industrial Policy
Faculty of Management,
University of Lodz, Poland
Email: makarygielda@wp.pl
Abstract
The subject discussed in this paper concerns the situation of small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) in the textile and chemical treatment industries in Lodz and Catalonia. This paper refers
to the case of external environment factors that significantly impact these enterprises. It also
addresses problems of technology transfer, barriers and opportunities resulting from
partnership with public sector. This research is based on literature studies and empirical view
on the environment of these two industries. It employs a method of open interviews with
experts representing the private and public domain in order to identify key factors that
influence that segment of activity. This paper has a structure of an international comparison of
two similar regions in Poland and in Spain, which are pioneers of high technology textile
services and chemical treatment.
Key words: SME, textiles, smart specialization, RIS3
JEL codes: D22, D29, F59, F39

Introduction

Many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face the problem of being displaced

from the market by their big competitors. Such situation is especially visible in the

environment of local specializations of regions where SMEs have been the leaders for

decades, exporting services and manufactured goods. More often the sector of high

technology companies is dealing successfully with such issue, and the only possibility

for SMEs to achieve technology level of bigger companies is to cooperate with public

sector. However the European policy requires companies to contribute to project

budget, which very often involves the amount that the small businesses cannot afford.

To understand this thesis better, it is necessary to look deeper into this problem.

Such situation is the characteristic for the area of regional specialization. Criteria in

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
1
which a smart specialization is selected involve such factors as technology or

production supply in which one of the criteria is the market leader. This in turn creates

regional advantages in comparison to other parts of the country or even Europe. Sectors

which historically have been of top importance to economic development are always

more developed than others, even despite economic, historical, and technology-related

difficulties. The sector of textiles and design is one of the few European regional smart

specializations. According to the historical review of Lodz and Catalonia, for centuries

those regions have been leaders in textile production and processes of its treatment.

Foresight of this sector assumes that more than 60% of SMEs (which represent

more than 95% of companies operating in this sector) will not have survived the next

20 years due to growing prices of waste treatment, environmental protection

regulations, economies of scale, external competitors and a relatively outdated

technology. Support for SMEs operating in this sector is one of the solutions to this

problem is. The strategy of smart specialization for the regions of Lodz and Catalonia

could protect textile sector from that vision of market. Support for SMEs is a method to

upgrade the technology used in the process of textile treatment and enables to extend

the base of recipients from local companies (Piasecki, 2015).

History and Characteristic of the Selected Regions

For many centuries, the Lodz region used to be a center of textile production in

Poland and a very big competitor on the international markets. Its favorable localization

in the center of Europe, between the western and eastern countries provided it with a

logistic advantage. Textile industry developed in Lodz fast due to Russian superiority

and its outlet, which took place in the nineteenth and twentieth century, however the

factors which were the key drivers for its development were: very cheap labour force

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
2
migrating from neighboring areas, access to water supply, which is very important in

this type of activity, and development of railway in that part of the country. In a

relatively short period of time, the city of Lodz became a center of textile production.

Unfortunately after the World War Two textile sector was practically closed down. It

regained its prosperity after 3 decades under the communist policy of regional

development of textile industry. That time was crucial mostly as a result of

implementation of new textile materials. That significant change introduced numerous

items of new machinery as well as technologies of finishing. It impacted not only the

way of production but also the development of a textile institute which was providing

this sector with many new ideas and creative solutions which resulted in many of

patents and licenses, both at the domestic and international level. Research in that

sector facilitated development of several new technologies, such as the stationary

vortex spinning method, isotopic technique, melt blown nonwoven, electro-conductive

fibers or low-temperature plasma. After the period of sustainable growth, which took

place during the political and economic transformation at the turn of the 1980s and

1990s, textile industry was privatized, and that resulted in a complete destabilization of

that sector of economy. In 1989, light industry was the most successful sector of

regional development in the Lodz Region. In that year, Polish light industry sector

reached the level of 12.2% production sold, and it employed 15.6% of the whole

population in the processing industry (Central Statistical Office, 1990). In the mid-f

1990s, Poland was the biggest European market supplier of finishing of fibers provided

by Polish textile industry. In the second half of that decade, an increasing tendency of

lowering the production of materials as well as a significant decrease of companies

engaged in rendering services to finish them was observed. Poor management of

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
3
industries led to their decline, or forced the entrepreneurs to move their businesses

outside of the city. The economic situation in 1990s was unfavorable to most of big

companies. However, in the meantime it provided development-related opportunities

for SMEs, including microenterprises. Many of today’s successful finishing companies

were established during that time. Most of them are family businesses, which have been

created by people working previously at large textile companies. In 1996, the

production of textiles reached the level of 5.5 million running meters, which was the

level of Polish production from 19461(Kubiak, 2014). China’s accession to the World

Trade Organization had a significant impact on fibers treatment activity, and it also

affected the Region of Lodz in terms of higher destabilization and pushing away of local

products (Zielinska-Glebocka, 2000).

Catalonia as well as the adjacent areas, has a very similar historical background.

The first industrial advantage was achieved between 1815 and 1855, as a result of

establishing 2152 companies at that time, where most of them operated in the textile

industry (Miro, 2010). In that time this region was the main competitor in Spain related

to modernized textile industry. Meantime in Europe the regions which could be

comparable with Catalonia were Alsace, textile regions of Switzerland, Lombardy or

Lancashire. However textile industry in Catalonia suffered from a recession in the

period of 1885-1890. According to Carles Enrech, that situation resulted from

expansion of the town mill system, which started in 1870s, de-skilling technical change,

increase of female employment, and periodical overproduction crises. Angel Smith, who

studied conflicts in textile industry in the early twentieth century, also suggested that

the excess capacity and the change in technology used in the processes had led to

1In 1946 – after the World War Two (WW II) the whole sector was practically destroyed.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
4
irreversible shift in labour demand (Domenech, 2005). Additionally, the second

industrialization stage (characterized with electricity consumption) took place in the

twentieth century.

A possibility of developing textile industry nationwide was the main advantage

offered by electricity supply, which shifted economic background. The industrial capital

which ceased to be exclusively autochthonous (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2015b) was

another factor that fostered the development. By that time Catalan textile industry

achieved the position of national leader. However, possibility of selling abroad was very

limited due to the lack of competitive industrial structure and adequate financial

support (which was provided by industries from other countries). The war and the

governmental policy impacted this sector. In the late 1950s, Spain restarted the highest

economic growth in its history (after stagnation lasting a quarter of century). All the

industrial sectors were developing (e.g. automotive industry which was one of the

sectors that triggered development of technical education, i.e. universities, institutes,

research and development (R&D) centers) while the sector of textile industry was

slowly declining. Catalonia became an “industrial island” that produced large amount of

different products. Industrial diversification of regional specializations in the 1980s has

led to development of prospering science supply network. In the early 1990s the textile

and clothing sector was affected by the phenomenon of globalization. Environment of

this sector was always very absorbent in terms of knowledge and technology used in

other regions/countries. The Catalan textile clusters started to face aggressive

competition from developing countries (from Europe in particular) that combined low

labor costs with high-quality equipment and know-how imported from more

industrialized countries. The World Trade Organization (WTO) on textile and clothing

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
5
also posed a serious threat to companies operating in this sector. At the same time new

production technologies and information and communication technologies (ICTs) were

flooding the market. These technologies not only increased productivity, but also

provided new distribution opportunities to reach the final market.

Structure of Economies and Innovative Potential

Lodz Region

Lodz Voivodeship holds the 9th position in the country in terms of the surface,

the 6th in terms of the size of its population, where 64% of inhabitants live in the city.

City of Lodz is the capital of the region, and it houses 50% of industrial companies. More

than 30% are high and mid-high technological-based enterprises.

In comparison to other regions, Lodz region is well developed in terms of

economy and has a relatively low unemployment rate. In 2010, this region has provided

6% of the total value of the national gross domestic product (GDP). According to this

indicator, Lodz region is ranked as the 6th in relation to the other Polish regions.

However the GDP growth in the Voivodeship is faster than in other parts of the country,

thus it can be described as a “chasing region”. The service sector has 55 % share, while

agriculture stays at the level of 13%. The industry share is 32% of all employed

population in the region. From the total number of REGON business activities

registration, approx. 6% was provided by companies registered in Lodz.

The structure of industry and services indicates that most of companies

operating in the sectors are medium and lower technology based companies with

smaller knowledge absorption capacities, which contributes to the fact that their share

in the total profits from selling innovative products is relatively low.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
6
This region continues to develop historical and traditional branches, such as

textile industry, energy, construction, food processing, medical services, pharmacy, and

creative industries2. One of the most dynamically developing technologies is

biotechnology being supported by R&D projects, highly educated labour force and

research centers, and others such as nanotechnology, technology of functional

materials, modern design and information technology (IT).

The Lodz region is ranked high in terms of its attractiveness to investors3. Special

conditions for running a business are offered by 2 special economic zones (SEZs) 4. The

region’ localization on the crossroad of 2 of 4 trans-European transport corridors and in

a plan of development of the central transportation hub represents another key regional

advantage.

The supply of a wide network of research centers and universities cooperating

with the private sector also is a very important aspect of regional development in this

part of Poland. However R&D field is supported with insufficient funds for machinery

and technical equipment. Scientists often use outdated systems and equipment 5, which

tends to create barriers to scientific research activity in comparison to scientists from

more developed countries. However despite the problems with adequate and modern

equipment, Lodz research centers and their laboratories stand out in both Polish and

European arena of science. It results from the activities implemented in the field of

biotechnology, polymers, biopolymers, chemistry and physics as well as participation of

2Creative industries include advertising, fashion design, architecture, movie production and others.
3It was ranked as the 4th in 2010 in the category of attractiveness for technologically advanced activities.
4 Lodz SEZ and Starachowice SEZ. The Lodz SEZ covers an area of 1,277 hectares and 190 investors have

been authorized to run their business in the special zone . This area attracts entrepreneurs from different
industries: ceramic, plastics processing, household and consumer goods, IT, BPO, logistic, cosmetic,
medical and pharmaceuticals. A research by E&Y delivered in 2011 indicates that the total value of
investments has been estimated to reach the level of 12 billion PLN and the amount of work places that
have been established as a result of the SEZ operations reached 23,200.
5 Indicator of equipment usage which is in percentage relation of usage value to gross value of fixed assets

has increased in Lodz Region in the period 2007-2010 from the value of 76.7% to 81.7%.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
7
Lodz centers and institutes in international associations and projects. Lodz region has

been classified as a bioregion due to its dynamically developing sector of companies and

scientific supply in the area of biotechnology (Deloitte, 2013). Two centers of

technology transfer are located in this region, as well as two entrepreneurship

incubators and one technology park (Bakowski and Mazewska, 2014). The level of

innovation among companies varies due to the size of companies. 61% of large

enterprises, 25% of medium enterprise and 5% of small enterprises were classified as

innovative.

Catalonia

The region of Catalonia with the population of 7.5 million people and GDP of

209,282 euro (2015) (Table 1) has been identified as the region with the strongest

national (Spanish) identity with its own (regional) language and culture.

Table 1. Primary Indicators of Economic Activeness of Lodz and Other Selected


Regions

Lodz* Poland* Catalonia Spain


Professional activity rate 57.1% 55.8% 62.6% 59.6%
Employment rate 52.1% 60.0% 49.9% 45.0%
Unemployment Rate 14.1%** 11.9%** 19.1% 24.5%
GDP (millions Euros) 44.985 714.051 209.282 1203.520
GDP growth rate 3% 3.4% 3.2% 2.5%
R&D investment (% of GDP) 0.11% 1.5% 1.5% 1.2%

*The following data refers to the research from the end of 2014.
**According to BAEL6.
Sources: Raport o sytuacji spoleczno-gospodarczej województwa lodzkiego 2014 page 22, Statistical Office
2014, Registered unemployment 2015,Generalitat de Catalunya 2015, OECD 2015.

Catalonia is an important region in the European Union (EU). Catalonia’s GDP per

capita is substantially higher than the EU average level. In fact the level of growth for

this indicator is 3.2% per annum. However the forecast for 2016 shows a tendency of its

6Research of economic activeness of population – is delivered every 3 months and covers population of
rotating sample of 20 000 households.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
8
stable decreasing to the level of 2.9% by the end of that year7. The regional economy

began to grow in the final quarter of 2013, despite continuous financial difficulties and

the problem of the government’s radical readjustment of finance (Generalitat de

Catalunya, 2014).

Unemployment rate stays at the level of 19.1%, which contributes to the fact that

the region has a major employment issue. The school drop-out rate stands at 24.7%,

which is significantly higher than the average indicator in the EU (12%).

Catalonia has also successfully entered the global market. Strongly export-

oriented sectors include automotive industry, tourism, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and

food. The following activities represent traditional service sector activities: trade,

logistics-oriented services, catering and food, medical services, design and advertising.

Examples of export-oriented knowledge-intense activities: business services, ICTs,

biotechnology, sustainable mobility, cultural industries, audiovisual production, energy

saving and efficiency, renewable energy and environment-related activities.

The economic crisis has led to a reduction in R&D investments by companies and

public administration. In 2012, the R&D investment reached 1.51% in Catalonia, far

from both the EU average (2.06%) and the 2020 target. More than half of this

expenditure (56.2%) was focused on the private sector. In Catalonia, the number of

patents per million inhabitants is lower than in any other regions in Europe. However,

in terms of scientific publications, Catalonia is well above the EU average (2.9% of

scientific papers published in Europe, compared to 1.5% of the total EU population).

Catalan participation in the European R&D programs is more than double the number

that correspond to the region by population (Catalonia received 574 million euro from

7The forecast developed by the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
9
the 2007-2013 European Framework Program, and doubled the figure received from

the previous programs) (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2014). Innovation potential impacts

competitiveness of the business system and the creation of wealth and employment,

therefore it is crucial that companies should take part in public-private R&D initiatives.

Conception of RIS3 in the European Commission

The essence of the matter of RIS conception is well described in its summary and

indicates the main goals of this strategy: “The Europe 2020 Strategy for smart,

sustainable and inclusive growth sets out the targets that the EU is to meet by the year

2020 in the fields of research and innovation, climate change and energy, employment,

education and reducing poverty. The strategy also includes seven flagship initiatives

that form the framework in which the EU and its member states governments are to join

forces and mutually strengthen each other in areas related to the Europe 2020 strategy

priorities.

For the 2014-2020 period the European Commission (EC) has designed an

integrated focus that brings together all the cohesion policy funds in common strategic

framework, clearly establishing the priorities and the results to be achieved. Moreover,

the EC has made smart specialization a prior condition for investment in research and

innovation co-financed by European funds. The member states and the regions are

required to draw up research and innovation strategies for smart specialization (RIS3

strategies). In accordance with the methodology established by the European

Commission, these strategies should support those economic and knowledge

specializations that match the best to their potential innovation, based on the resources

and capabilities in the territory” (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2015a).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
10
Conceptions of Regional Strategy of Innovation RIS CAT and RIS LORIS

Experts’ responses and establishment of innovative position of Lodz region

through indicators such as RNSII8, REUSII9 were the key factors addressed to draft

strategy for RIS LORIS 2030 (Hollanders, 2006). Both the indicators connect many

important elements10 that show advantages in particular fields. Knowledge-intense

business services (KIBS) which includes wide range of activities provided commercially

and/or (co)financed from public funds, characterized by high knowledge intensity

(Rogut and Piasecki, 2008) is another key factor. The research was based on regional

input-output models and delivered to establish local specializations. However, some

scientists consider that insufficient data in intermodal flows creates an incomplete

model in order to understand factors that influence different sectors (Plich, 2011).

As regards the smart specializations in Poland, this initiative is supported by the

RPO (Regional Operational Program). Activities foreseen for implementation under

operational goals are adapted to recipients of the support under 3 key fields (priorities):

1. regional specialization – of companies and groups which will drive units that

support areas of specializations;

2. development of innovative potential – common use of innovations – companies,

people and external units out from the field of specializations, supporting activities

of increasing level of competitiveness and regional innovations; and

8The Regional National Summary Innovation Index which indicates the position of the region in the
country – index assumes relation to national average level.
9The Regional European Summary Innovation Index which indicates the position of region in European

Union – index assumes relation to EU25 (Methodology used in this indicator covers the period before the
last European Union enlargement).
10Human resources for science and technology, the number of participants in various forms of continuing

education, public and private expenditure on research and development, the number of employment in
medium and high technology industries, technologically advanced services, as well as the number of
European patents.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
11
3. management of innovations in the region – units and structures that create

opportunities to develop innovation and insure of support in stage of implementing

innovational projects.

Priority 1 (regional specialization): during an analysis of the potential of Lodz

region, which was supported by additional evaluation of branches, the following

branches, which have a special innovational potential and could become regional

motors of growth, were selected: (i) medicine, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics

(including health resort medicine); (ii) power industry (including renewable energy);

(iii) modern textile industry and design; (iv) advanced building materials (including

design in this sector); (v) innovative agriculture and food processing; and (vi)

information and telecommunication.

Companies operating in these sectors will be able to receive support under the

EU funding in the financial perspective of 2014-2020. The following priority fields of

technology were evaluated for these branches: (i) biotechnology; (ii) mechatronics; (iii)

nanotechnology; and (iv) ICTs.

The identified technologies are going to assist development of those branches of

local specialization in terms of support under Priority 1. It is quite possible that in the

future this number of branches and technologies will increase by new dynamic areas

(such as BPO, logistics, mechanical engineering, electromechanical industry or furniture

production).

Priority 2 (development of innovative potential): it assumes the need of using

potential of SMEs which are active outside of the key branches listed in Priority 1.

Adding areas that have been created naturally due to their features (expanse, internal

potential, concentration and development of specialized economic functions) and

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
12
should constitute centers of regional development should be highlighted: Lodz

metropolitan region, and touristic areas of Valleys of the Pilica, the Warta, and the Bzura

rivers.

In terms of Priority 2, apart from functional regions, the support should also

cover sub-regional centers of growth. Further development of functional areas and

particular sub-regions should take place by increasing innovativeness of local

companies, development of R&D centers and development under the network of

cooperation.

Priority 3 (management of innovations in the Region): the aim of this Priority

assumes improvement of regional innovation management. However this type of

activity requires preparation of institutional structures and tools that will support

implementation of initiatives listed in the two previous Priorities.

The proposed system of implementation for RIS LORIS 2030 Action Plan in Lodz

region assumes that the role of the institution which in cooperation with Innovation

Council will decide into which fields the support should be provided will be assigned to

the local government and the Marshall Office. In this plan, environment of public

technology institutions will be intermediary bodies that will be connected with the field

of businesses. The above-mentioned strategy assumes cooperation of public institutions

(such as Universities, CTTs, Technology Parks, Institutions related to R&D and others)

with the businesses from the key branches.

RIS3 CAT Priorities of Europe 2020 has been adopted through ECAT2020 11which

was its government roadmap for re-launching the economy and reorientation of

production sector towards smarter and more sustainable economic growth model. In

11Catalonian Strategy of 2020.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
13
result, ECAT 2020 increases level of employment and sets out public policies aimed at

improving regional competitiveness. Strategy of RIS focuses on particular pillars (areas

of priority): employment and training, social cohesion, innovation and knowledge,

entrepreneurism, internationalization and green economy. Based on that vision of

country towards 2020, RIS3CAT concentrates on (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2015a):

R&D as a driver for the economic transformation of the production system towards a

competitive and sustainable model that suits employment and social cohesion; and

cooperation among stakeholders to generate new opportunities for creation of wealth

and employment.

In order to develop local economy and promote cross-cutting vision that seeks

partnership actions between private and public sector, RIS3CAT has been established

through deep analysis of strengths, weaknesses opportunities of Catalonian economy

taking into consideration different sectors of economy and technologies. This analysis

assumes the main regional specializations due to its development, innovations and

technology used in the different sectors (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2014):

1. the legacy of the Catalan industrial tradition. In the 21 st century, the development of

the Catalan industry should place the emphasis on the key competitive factors such

as innovation, design and training;

2. the wellbeing of people in such spheres as food, health, leisure and lifestyle, in which

R&D generates economic opportunities and direct benefits for both individuals and

society as a whole; and

3. the global challenges posed by climate change, the impact of human activity and

shortages of natural resources.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
14
To make Vision 202012 a reality, RIS3CAT has established strategic objectives

and pillars of action, as shown in Table 2. Each of the above-mentioned pillars bonds the

strategic objectives together. Pillar 1 (leading sectors) refers to the historical view of

Catalan industry in order to identify the dominant sector from the diversified structure

of its economy. In comparison to other regions, Catalonia has a competitive advantage

in several sectors that are more developed and which play a significant role of added

value to smart specialization strategy (such as tourism, textile industry, health, and

culture). Catalonian advantages are measured through factors that have driven the

transformation of that region (industrial tradition, quality of life and green economy),

and implementation of the seven criteria which enable to identify the leading sectors:

 critical mass in different sectors – measured through the number of companies (in

the field of a particular sector), employment, gross added value;

 Internationalization – measured through export indicators, analysis of the presence

of foreign multinationals and potential for internationalization;

 sectors capacity – through existence of unique or competitive advantages in specific

sector (fairs, internationally prestigious activities and companies recognized

internationally for their successful strategies, etc.); and

 potential of generating new economic activities and employment, based on such

factors as intense use of labor and current growth of leading enterprises.

Consequently, the following sectors have been selected: food, energy and

resources, industrial systems, design-based industries, industries linked to sustainable

mobility, health industries, cultural and experience-based industries.

12According to RIS3CAT from 2014, Catalonia is presented as “… a country with an industrial base and an
open, competitive and sustainable economy that combines talent, creativity, a diversified business fabric
and its own excellent research system within framework of dynamic, enterprising and inclusive society.
The country is home to both multinational enterprises and local companies, both consolidated industries
that have become international leaders and emerging technological sectors”.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
15
Table 2. Relationship between Strategic Objectives and Pillars
Strategic objectives Pillars
To modernize business fabric by improving the efficiency of Pillar 1 Leading sectors
production processes, internationalization and the
reorientation of consolidated sectors towards activities with
greater added value
To promote new emerging economic activities through Pillar 2 Emerging activities
research and innovation to create and develop new market
niches
To consolidate Catalonia as European knowledge hub and link Pillar 3 Cross-cutting enabling
technological and creative capacities to existing and emerging technologies
sectors in the territory
To improve the overall Catalan innovation system, improving Pillar 4 Innovation environment
the competitiveness of companies and steering public policies
towards promotion of innovative solutions,
internationalization and entrepreneurship.
Source: RIS3CAT (2014).

Pillar 2 (emerging activities) identifies and promotes new economic

opportunities in the emerging sectors based on technological capabilities, such as new

activities generated by the technological change and the latest innovations, as well as

synergy between related sectors, i.e. between the firmly established branch and new

branches which are staying still at the stage of development. The process of drawing up

RIS3CAT revealed several areas of emerging activity, such as mobile applications,

printed electronics and biomass.

Pillar 3 (cross-cutting enabling technologies) refers to RIS3CAT which focuses on

6 cross-cutting enabling technologies: ICTB, nanotechnology, advanced materials,

photonics, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Description of the Cross-Cutting Enabling Technologies


ICT Technologies used in digital processes,
transmitted store information
Nanotechnology Study design, creation and application of
materials, equipment and functional systems
through control at nanometric scale, use of
phenomena on properties that are generated in
this state
Advance materials Application of know-how and technology used to
produce new materials and matter that generate
new properties and reduces costs of production
and environmental impact

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
16
Photonics A multidisciplinary scientific field based on know-
how and applications related to the light,
generation, control, treatment and detection of
photons in the visible and non-visible ranges
Biotechnology Use of living organisms, biological systems or
their derivatives to create or modify products or
processes. Biotechnology is based on such
knowledge areas as microbiology, biochemistry
and genetics
Advanced manufacturing The application of innovative know-how and
technologies to optimize production systems in
order to obtain new products, reduce time,
energy, water and material costs in processes,
improve precision, quality, safety and reduce
environmental impact
Source: RIS3CAT (2014).
Pillar 4 (innovation environment) focuses on the competitiveness of companies

in the global market. Mainly in the field of SMEs which often lack the capacity to develop

their own R&D. The possibility and easiness to absorb, combine and apply know-how

and new technology solutions is a relevant key factor in this context. RIS3CAT identifies

and strengthens those public policies that most directly impact the quality of innovation

environment. This approach is well expressed in Catalonia strategy report which

indicates elements such as quality of training and education amongst the population,

the provision of infrastructure, organizational and company management capacity and

the existence of an institutional framework to support innovation and its dissemination

in the economic system are, therefore, key to the competitiveness of companies in given

territory.

Textile Industry as a Smart Specialization of the Regions

Local market of textile production and treatment is difficult to be investigated as

well from the point of the existing companies that are functioning in that sector as in the

field of future trends. In many available research publications the basic materials are

supported by statistical data. However in terms of the market structure of textile

industry we can mainly observe small and micro companies that operate in this sector.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
17
The statistical requirement concerns these companies that employ 50 and more

employees. The statistical methodology of estimating the demand and supply of

finished product involves selecting a sample of a particular type of companies and

comparing it to the macroeconomic view. Those statistical databases do not cover many

interesting factors, such as the level of technology and market share (in demand for

different kinds of services). This indicates difficult conditions in terms of finding new

market for textile products in services of finishing them, and in the branches which are

cooperating with them. The only way to investigate the market demand is to perform an

appropriate research based on experts responses as well as indicating of following

trends in that sector using international comparison to regions with similar structure

and specialization.

Opportunities for textile sector and the sector of chemical treatment mostly

depend on the size of company, ability to follow and adapt to trends and conditions of

the future market. In these circumstances, fast development of technology used by

companies to overtake local competition constitutes a very important task. These

opportunities are clearly available in both Lodz region and in Catalonia. The share of the

local market is hard to be fully measured, also due to the diversity in finishing of textile

materials by SMEs which represent more than 90% of whole capacity in this sector. The

lack of the statistical requirement for the companies results in insufficient data for such

research 13. Thus the following research could be carried out only by selecting a sample

of that sector with focus on interesting factors (such as production capacity, technology

used, machinery and their abilities, share of production, services rendered, material

exported, future trends, etc.).

It is necessary to get into the consideration that all of the materials that is going to be sold as a textile is
13

mentioned as a finished - in statistical data. There is no database with raw textile or knitwear.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
18
The opportunities are also facilitated by companies’ investments in new

technologies that will be important on the market. Creating supply for special niche of

recipients will provide competitive advantage, also on external market, not only to

bigger companies that finish textiles but also to small ones that are able to develop in

that trends. Supporting funds are of top importance in this context. They will enable

micro-sized companies to chase those bigger that can afford higher expenditures on

R&D due to several factors, such as savings in environmental expenditures, higher

creditability, higher income and lower cost per unit in point of economies of scale. A

strategy presented at the end of 2006 by the EU had a huge impact on textile industry,

however the concept of its future development and support was discussed much earlier

at the Conference of “The future is Textiles”, which took place in Brussels in June that

year. 9 experts from Poland who had participated thanks to project of Loristex

(Krucinska, 2007) were involved in drafting of that strategy. Full characteristic was

evaluated in the “Analysis of textile industry development trend”.

In order to understand the meaning of technology used in finishing textile

materials it is necessary to consider aspects of environment and capacity of the

company. The market competition does not only depend on the number of services

rendered for different companies. Technology used in the processes of finishing

materials provides benefits in two areas.

The first one is the field of environmental protection issues. The environmental

regulations lead to bigger spending on waste, which is an obvious outcome of finishing

textiles processes. The higher technology is used in the process of filtering the more

fresh water is going back into circuit, and as a result, expenditure on waste is

decreasing. SMEs constitute more than 90% of the companies rendering such services,

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
19
and they cannot afford the increasing prices. During implementation of the

environmental policy the European Commission, legislation will be more and more

restrictive, and as a consequence, the companies spending on wastes will increase.

Small companies will not be able to pay such amounts without raising prices for their

services (what also results in lack of competitiveness).

The other area covers benefits resulting from technology used in processes at

different stages. The higher level of technology indicates a bigger interest in material

after process of its finishing and as a result, the demand for a specific good (as a

favorable material for children or special material for military forces). The aim of

finished textile goods in high quality technology becomes very popular in East where

the standard of living has remarkably increased and as a result, the level of quality of

goods has increased as well. That situation precisely shows the future trends and needs

of textile market and its opportunities for European companies. Unfortunately they will

only be available for bigger companies that will be able to follow trends on a market

with increasing technology used in the process of finishing textile materials and

individual strategies for environment protection without increasing their costs per unit.

A solution for small companies lies in the European Policy which is an external factor

that has impact on the local microeconomy (Piasecki, 2015).

In this context, perceiving textile industry as one of the fields of regional

specialization in Lodz Region and Catalonia, represents one of the solutions that will

bring back possibility of development for sector of SMEs operating in this area of

economy. Support brought to textile industry will allow small companies not only to

survive but also to be competitive on the external market. A broad environment of

public institutions (universities of technology, institutes, SEZs, research centers,

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
20
technology parks and other centers that support innovation and technology

improvement) allow those regions to fully fulfill goals and aims of their regional

innovation strategies.

Conclusion and Policy Recommendation

EU policy opens a new way for SME’s to develop not only taking into

consideration policy of reindustrialization which will definitely have a positive impact

on the market structure through increasing level of innovativeness of light industry, but

also it will increase competitiveness in developed sectors through establishing a

strategy of regional specializations. In that circumstances companies related to textile

industry have great opportunities to increase their level of technology. However

possibilities mentioned above are focusing on big companies that could have a bigger

impact into projects budget.

One of the solutions for small companies to achieve higher technology level and

become good competitors on the market is the creation of consortiums focusing on

companies related to this sector and standing for projects specially directed to small

companies, such as “Bridge Alfa”. According to trends in the structure in that sector,

external supports from EU fund seem to be the only way for many small and micro

companies to stay on the market and have possibility to develop.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
21
References

Bąkowski, A. and M. Mażewska (2014), "Ośrodki innowacji w Polsce (z uwzględnieniem


inkubatorów przedsiębiorczości)”, Raport z badania 2014, PARP, Warsaw.

Central Statistical Office (1990), Statistical Yearbook, Warsaw.

Central Statistical Office (2015), Registered unemployment, Warsaw.

Deloitte Business Consulting S.A., Łódzka Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego S.A. (2013),
"Regionalna Strategia Innowacji dla Województwa Łódzkiego –LORIS 2030”, Urząd
Marszałkowski w Łodzi, Lodz

Domenech, J. (2005), “Labour Market Adjustment to Economic Downturns in the Catalan Textile
Industry, 1880-1910. Did employers Breach Implicit Contracts?”, Working Paper No. 88/05,
London School of Economics, London.

Generalitat de Catalunya (2014), “Catalonia 2020 Strategy 2012-2014 Report”, Government of


Catalonia. Ministry of Economy and Knowledge, Barcelona.

Generalitat de Catalunya, (2015a), “RIS3CAT Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart
Specialisation of Catalonia”, Government of Catalonia. Ministry of Economy and Knowledge,
Barcelona

Generalitat de Catalunya (2015b), “The MNACTEC and industrialization in Catalonia. 18th


Century AC – 21st Century AC”, Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia. Retrieved from: http://
gencat.cat/ culturcat/portal/site/culturacatalana/menuitem.

Hollanders, H., (2006), “European Regional Innovation Scoreboard (2006 RIS), European Trend
Chart on Innovation”. Retrieved from: http://trendchart.cordis.europa.eu/scoreboards/
scoreboards2006/pdf/eis_2006_regional_innovation_scoreboard_scoreboard.pdf.

Krucinska, I. (2007), Diagnoza potencjału jednostek badawczo-rozwojowych i procesu


komercjalizacji badan, Instytut Badan nad Przedsiębiorczością i Rozwojem Ekonomicznym
przy Społecznej Wyższej Szkole Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania, Lodz.

Kubiak, K. (2014), Rola organizacji przedsiębiorców w zarzadzaniu restrukturyzacja


przedsiębiorstw włókienniczych i odzieżowych, Lodz.

Miro M., Blasco Y., Lozano S, and Soler R. (2010), “Centrality and investment at the beginning of
industrialization in mid-nineteenth-century Catalonia”, Business History, 52(3): 493-515.

Piasecki, M. (2015), Small and Medium Enterprises in Regional Specialization, Firmy rodzinne –
doświadczenia i perspektywy zarządzania. Tom XVI, Zeszyt 7, Cześć 1, Przedsiębiorczość i
Zarządzanie, Łódź.

Plich, M. (2011), "Model ekonometryczny”, report of the project ”Rola bezpośrednich inwestycji
zagranicznych w kształtowaniu aktualnego i przyszłego profilu gospodarczego
województwa łódzkiego”, Lodz.

Rogut, A. and Piasecki, B. (2008), "Regional Innovation Strategy for Lodz Province, RSI LORIS
PLUS". 6th Framework Programme, Structuring the European Research Area, Regional

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
22
Innovational Policies Including New Tools and Approaches, Społeczna Wyższa Szkoła
Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania w Łodzi, Lodz.

Zielinska-Glebocka, A. (2000), "Konkurencyjność przemysłu Polski – analiza wskaźnikowa i


strukturalna. Implikacje dla polityki”, in Anna Zielinska-Glebocka, et al. (eds),
Konkurencyjność przemysłowa Polski w procesie integracji z Unia Europejska, Fundacja
Rozwoju Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdansk.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 1 - 23
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
23
Taxation of Farming Enterprises in Poland and the
European Union - a Comparative Analysis
Elżbieta Klamut
University of Social Sciences,
Warsaw, Poland
Email: eklamut@san.edu.pl

Abstract

Every state has the right to constitute its own burdens on economic activity. After Polish
accession to the European Union the part of tax burden is being customized to the requirements
of a community. Farm tax which is applied in taxation of Polish agriculture is an anachronism.
How far does taxation in Poland diverge from the solutions in other EU countries? Will
introduction of income tax in Polish agriculture impoverish the state budget or the opposite?
These are just a few issues contained in this study.
Key words: taxes, farming enterprises, farm tax, income tax
JEL codes: H25,H32,Q12,D31

Introduction

In the European Union countries existing taxation constructions serve primarily

the interests of general public. They are designed in order to achieve the objectives of

both fiscal and socio-general nature as well as secure selected sectors of the economy.

These sectors include, among others agriculture, particularly exposed to frequently

unpredictable effects of natural risks. There are different systems of agriculture’s

taxation in the EU countries.. Some of them use significant preferences in systems of

taxing agriculture, while, others use appropriate preferences, but to a limited extent.

Among the EU countries, there are those that do not introduce any special tax

concessions for agriculture.

The basis of the agricultural system in Poland is a family-run farming enterprise.

It is also one of the factors of a successful Polish agriculture as well as food industry. The

issues of these entities have become increasingly discussed in recent years. It begins to

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
24
appear more frequently in various types of scientific studies. The United Nations

Agricultural Organisation declared 2014 the year of farming enterprises having regard

to the prominence of the issue of functioning and development of the mentioned

entities. The European Commission (EC) is as interested in their functioning.

Undertaking the study of taxation of farming entities strikes the lack of treating

farms as family-run enterprises in some European countries. Most remain subject to

succession, in other words, they pass from father to son, thus being multigenerational.

Contemporary shape of agriculture of most European countries is the model based on

family-run enterprises. They not only produce and supply urban and also partly rural

areas, but by retaining younger generations in the latter, they renew and sustain their

'vitality' as well as create social welfare.

Poland is among those countries that treat taxation of farming enterprises

differently from taxing other business activities. Which of the systems used in Western

countries would be suitable for the taxation of agriculture in Poland? Or should Poland

develop its own separate system? According to farmers, the existing separate taxation of

the agricultural sector in Poland is right and just, but the remaining part of a society

considers it too liberal and unfair. The aim of the study is to compare systems of

taxation of the agricultural sector in Europe as well as indicate advisability of

converting the farm tax to income tax. An important point while examining applied

solutions of the taxation is the value of revenues from the taxation of agriculture. Will

the introduction of new solutions in Polish conditions increase budget revenues or

decrease them? One of the major issues of introducing changes in the taxation of family-

run farming enterprises is their impact on efficiency as well as their faster development

and increase in competitiveness. Tax systems should adequately stimulate

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
25
entrepreneurial activities; unfortunately, the farm tax in Poland in its present form does

not motivate to increase efficiency or entrepreneurial activities. Will the proposed

changes of tax in agriculture contribute to the growth of entrepreneurship in rural

areas?

Faming Enterprises in Poland

From the 2010 Agricultural Census (2010), it reveals that in comparison with the

previous census (2002) the number of farming enterprises has decreased by

approximately 22.4%, i.e. about 656 thousand units (Central Statistical Office of

Poland’s Report 2011). While conducting the census there were 2,278 thousand farming

enterprises in Poland, including as many as 1,563 thousand of those with an area of

agricultural land exceeding 1 ha. About 1,559 thousand enterprises are the individual

ones.

Considering the number of farming enterprises in terms of volume, it can be

noted that among all households the most constitute small entities up to 1 ha (31.4% of

overall) (Martin and Jacob, 2012) and those with an area of slightly above 5 -10 ha –

about 15.4 %. Within this range, a refinement can be made and thus starting from 1-2 ha

there are approximately 15% of households from 2 to 3 ha – 10.3%, and from 3-5 ha –

12.7%. The most enterprises (regardless of size) operate in the following regions:

Malopolskie (12.4%), Mazowieckie (12.2), Podkarpackie (11.5), Lubelskie (11.3), while

the fewest in Lubuskie (1.9), Opolskie (2.0), Zachodniopomorskie (2.1) and Pomorskie

(2.7) (Central Statistical Office of Poland, 2011). Looking at this data from the other

angle, i.e. taking into account the size of the farm, it is in these last provinces that we

find the largest farming enterprises in terms of area. And the following provinces:

Zachodniopomorskie–here the average farming area amounted to 23.36 ha,

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
26
Warmińsko–Mazurskie had 18.94 ha and Pomorskie-15.87 ha. Households with the

least acreage are located in the south - eastern Poland: Małopolskie with the average of

2.80 ha, Podkarpackie-2.88 ha and Śląskie with 4.23 ha of farmland.

According to a report from Martin and Jacob (2012), main barriers to the

development of farming enterprises are perceived by farmers in high-costs of means of

production and its lack of profitability (low products prices) as well as unfavourable

climatic and soil conditions and lack of opportunities to expand the acreage. Along the

abovementioned there would also be high competitiveness, sources of financing

investments in agriculture, and lack of employees as well as tax system and limits in

production introduced by the Common Agricultural Policy. Among the opportunities

they report are the following: investments increasing labour productivity, making

production more profitable as well as purchasing additional acreage and joining

producers' groups as well as a better use of resources available.

Polish agriculture, like the majority in the EU benefits from direct farming

subsidies. Allocation of these obtained subsidies (Martin and Jacob, 2012) may be

slightly different than in other countries. In Poland, vast majority of farmers allocate

these payments on purchasing means of production (fertilizers, pesticides), machinery

and equipment which occupy the 3rd place, followed by modernisation or expansion of

farm buildings (located on the 6th), while purchasing land, in turn, is located on the 7th.

Such an allocation of subsidies testifies to wearing for their operational activity.

Taxes in the Economy and Optimisation

In general definitions tax is a special form of a compulsory burden that taxpayers

provide to certain entities. The theory of optimal taxation considers its core subject

such defining a tax system that allows the realization of a maximum level of social

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
27
welfare under certain tax revenues. That realization usually is carried out by minimizing

adverse and negative effects of taxation, taking into account some limitations. Nearly

always there is a difficulty with defining such a tax structure that enables achieving a

desired tax income. This issue remains precisely in the circle of interest of the optimal

taxation theory. Furthermore, the subject of interest of this concept is the impact of

taxes on the basic elements of functioning markets, and thus on economic growth as

well as workforce mobility or taking up business activity 1.

For ages there has been a conflict of interest between two parties in the issue of

taxation. On the one hand, there are taxpayers whose earned incomes are reduced by

taxes (economic category), while on the other, a state for which taxes are the most

effective source of budget revenues. The state wanting to draw revenues continuously

must partly protect this source, while increasing cost-effectiveness of taxpayer's

activities. The taxpayers, in turn, may benefit from the freedom of choice of different

forms of taxation and simplification of tax returns as well as various deductions,

concessions, expenses, etc.

According to taxpayers the tax system will neither be fair nor stable. Simplicity of

systems, small number of taxes as well as changes to the regulations are symptoms of

transparency and stability of the system. However, fulfilling certain conditions

necessary for a good tax system does not result in satisfying all taxpayers. There will

always be a taxpayer dissatisfied with the existing system of collected taxes. It should be

cited here:‘since tax was introduced the taxpayers have demanded reforms. A tax reform is

a kind of myth. Like alchemists seeking the philosophers’ stone, political parties, pressure

1See study on the impact of taxes on economic activity in: J. B. Cullen, R. H. Gordon, Taxes and Entrepreneurial
Activity: Theory and Evidence for the U.S., National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 9015, Cambridge
2002, page 36.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
28
groups as well as lone researchers and those inspired look for an ideal tax system (…)

without finding it, obviously (…)’ (Rivoli,1965).

One of the important objectives of the state is to maximise the social welfare

function as well as budget revenues. The main criterion of optimisation is the

minimization of any negative consequences of income redistribution by the state. It is

therefore necessary for the tax system to be economically efficient. (Grądalski, 2006).

The assumption of the tax optimisation theory is an already mentioned maximisation of

social welfare while relevant tax revenues to the budget and cost minimisation of tax

execution are maintained at the same time.

Tax Burdens on Farming Enterprises in Poland – Current State

Farm tax remains one of many elements of the taxation of business entities'

activity, including farms. Introduced by the Farm Tax Act (Journal of Laws, 1993) it

replaced a progressive land tax existing from 1946. The basis for calculating farm tax is

the amount of a value in use of certain land, which is determined by valorisation (using

conversion factors) into calculation hectares (tax) (Gruziel, 2008). Consequently, a land

with an appropriate classification contained in the land register can be taxed. The base

of taxation in this tax is the number of physical or calculative hectares that are included

in this register. This means that the farm tax is imposed on all agricultural land, as well

as land covered with trees and bushes, regardless of their surface, profitability or

location (Journal of Laws, 2002).

The basic criteria of assessing the farm tax are the following:

 the area of lands that are subject to taxation;

 settlement of farm (tax regions);

 the type and quality of agricultural land;

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
29
 hectare norms;

 exemptions and concessions;

 fixed tax rates;

In turn, the economic criteria of that tax dimension (Podstawka, 2000) are the

following: value in use, hectare standards, standards defining the value in use, tax

regions, tax rates as well as tax concessions and exemptions. Agricultural lands, which

are subject to taxation and which are separated in the records are called arable lands,

permanent pastures and meadows, built-up agricultural lands, orchards as well as lands

under ponds and ditches.

Each year the farm tax rate varies and depends on the price of a 1q of rye

established in the announcement of the President of the Central Statistical Office of

Poland.

The disadvantage of this solution is treating the farm tax as a universal tax.

Unfortunately, it opens the possibilities of speculation to people wishing to take

advantage of a low tax burden. This practice is carried out by acquiring land by people

who do not perform any agricultural activities either for speculative purposes or to

benefit from subsidies or other preferences laid for farmers. A separate way is an

'artificial' increase of agricultural areas owned in order to reduce the amount of farm

tax paid.

Among Polish farmers the majority say that the current farm tax rate is generally

fair, although some of them propose changes to the rules determining conversion

factors. Some respondents also propose a change to inadequately selected tax districts.

Farmers, especially of older age, remain afraid of the changes, especially of the duty of

additional records or settlements.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
30
Taxes in Farming Enterprises in Selected EU Countries

There are numerous changes and reforms occurring in the economies of EU

countries, however, each member state of the community builds its own, separate tax

system. The substrate characteristics of these systems are seen primarily in:

 the role of the state in the economy;

 tax mentality among the population;

 the standard of living of the society;

 consumer habits, etc.

In countries such as France, Spain, Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Greece and

Poland one observes a relatively high share of consumption taxes in the revenues of the

state, and a low share of personal income taxes. The reverse situation is observed in

Finland, Ireland, Belgium, Denmark or the UK, where incomes of individuals are subject

to a high taxation.

The majority of the EU countries introduce various kinds of concessions or

preferences for specific sectors of the economy. Undoubtedly, in every country this

particular branch is agriculture. Most of the European countries do not create a separate

tax regime for the sector, but introduce provisions dealing with revenues from it

somewhat differently. This treating agriculture with special consideration is often

referred to as agricultural tax expenditures.

In tax systems of European countries there can be derived two solutions of

agriculture’s taxation. First group of countries comprises those where agriculture

remains subject to generally binding tax regulations with no exceptions (Finland) or by

introducing preferences or concessions which enable the development of agriculture

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
31
(north-west European countries and Slovakia). Second group consists of countries that

created a separated (specific) tax system for agriculture in order to support this sector.

These are countries such as Poland (farm tax), Germany, Austria, France or Italy. An

abridged description of taxation rules are demonstrated in Table 1.

Table 1. Legal Forms of Farms and Taxation Principles in the EU Countries


Country Type of legal form Tax solutions in agriculture
Belgium sole proprietorships Privileged taxation of the EU subsidies and for those resigning from
agriculture. There are refinanced loans and accelerated depreciation is
allowed. One of the options is the estimated form of calculating income, but
only until aligning with an actual income.
France sole proprietorships Lunp-sum or estimate forms of calculating income, and simplified
and partnerships accounting. Possibilities: deducting costs on investment by young farmers,
loss settlement, applying small income from 3 consecutive years.
The sole proprietorships Optionally applied: loss settlement, determining incomes on the basis of an
Netherlands and partnerships average income from 3 years, investment concessions, accelerated
depreciation.
Luksemburg sole proprietorships Simplified accounting. Possibility of loss settlement.
Germany sole proprietorships Lump-sum or estimate forms of calculating income, and simplified
and partnerships accounting. Possibilities: loss settlement, applying average income from 3
years, creating investment reserves as well as accelerated depreciation.
Italy sole proprietorships Lump-sum income.
Great Britain Partnerships Determining income based on the average from 2 years ( one of the options).
Investment fund deducted from the tax base, additional depreciation.

Ireland sole proprietorships Introduced preferences for ecological agriculture. Income determined on the
basis of the average from 3 years.
Denmark sole proprietorships Income determined on the basis of a project scheme. Small farms taxed non-
normative. Possibility of further deductions on R+D in farming entities.
Greece no data Taxation based on general principles.
Spain sole proprietorships Small farms evaluate income by estimates (vast majority)
Tax concessions: Loans on ecological investments, on B+R as well as
exporting activity.
Austria sole proprietorships Income determined by the forms of flat fee and estimates. Simplified form of
accounting. Fiscal year chosen individually.
Czech Republic 11% of farms – legal persons, Taxation based on general principles.
the remaining - family-run
farms
Estonia sole proprietorships Small farms (income up to 45 000 krona) exempt from tax. Higher income
taxed on general principles.
Lithuania sole proprietorships Small farms exempt from taxation with income tax, the remaining use
variable tax rate.
Latvia no data Small farms exempt from taxation as well as rural agro-tourism entities and
partly gardening activity with low income. Subsidies for agricultural
production exempt from taxation.
Poland family-run farms They are subject to agriculture tax only.
Slovakia ole proprietorships Taxation based on general principles.
Hungary no data Taxation based on general principles.
Source: own study based on (Ogrodnik, 2009).

The majority of given tax systems is based on the principle of justice in

burdening citizens. Is Polish system, which as the only one has a separate system of

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
32
taxation of some of its citizens fair? Depending on the area of research approach differs

slightly. Some citizens claim that the system is unfair and farmers should be treated in

the same way as all other citizens. On the other hand, another group believes that

agriculture is an important sector of the economy and should be treated with

distinction.

More and more frequently the diminishing role of land as a factor shaping

agricultural income is mentioned while productive factors such as labour and capital are

highlighted. In Poland, the income approach dominates in the construction of farm tax

as opposed to the 'old EU countries', in which income from agricultural activity is

excluded from taxation. As it has already been explained taxation systems vary widely.

Therefore, it is needed to look at the tax burdens of EU farmers. The main tax obligation

imposed on farmers in the EU member states is income tax, whose construction is

supposed to support an applied agricultural model. Additional taxes remain the value

added tax and property wealth tax. With regard to agriculture, there are various

preferences (e.g. rates) and estimate methods of calculating income as well as

concessions and exemptions applied to the income tax.

Table 2. Tax Rates on Personal Income in Agriculture in Selected EU Countries in


2012
Country Tax rate
Minimum Maximum
Austria 23 50
Belgium 25 50
France 5.5 40
Germany 0 45
Poland Farm tax Farm tax
Ireland 20 42
Great Britain 20 40
Denmark 25.6 55.38
Source:http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/pages/individual-
income-tax-ratestable.aspx, oraz Fiscalite et securite social: Le sector agricole (OECD, 2005, page 37).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
33
The solutions used in Poland can also be found in Romania, and until recently in

Bulgaria too. Taxation in Bulgaria was based on the principle of a flat-rate tax (rate at

10%), but by the end of 2009 revenues from agricultural activities were almost entirely

excluded from taxation with the income tax (Monel-Mugrurel, 2010). Since 2011,

farmers have been taxed based on the principle of taxation of income on business

activity. In Romania, just as in Poland, part of the agricultural activity is exempted from

taxation with income tax, but some of the revenues remain subject to taxation.

Revenues from these agricultural activities are determined with the use of appropriate

income standards, defined for the tax year or on the basis of an actual net income

determined on the basis of simplified accounting (Monel-Mugrurel, 2010).

Agriculture treated specifically in terms of taxation occurs in nearly all EU

countries. In most countries taxation is based on actual data obtained from accounting

systems (usually simplified), but the estimate systems of revenue or income also apply.

It should be noted that European standards comprise the taxation of Polish

special branches of the agricultural production, as similar exist in many countries.

However, this is only a small segment of the Polish agricultural taxation system based

on agricultural tax.

In majority of countries agriculture is taxed generally, but with the use of

preferential solutions. In taxation systems are used hidden mechanisms commonly

supporting agriculture in the form of modern tools. The most frequently are various

solutions in the income tax which allow applying the policy as low tax burden on

agriculture occurs. Polish solutions of taxing agriculture should be amended, and

procrastinating these reforms may become very expensive.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
34
It is worth examining for comparison the taxation of agriculture in countries

outside the EU. And so, in the US income taxes on federal level do not exclude

agriculture from taxation. Frequently, there are three types of taxes on agriculture.

These include: an 'ordinary' tax (ordinary income tax to pay), a tax for self-employed

(self-employment tax) and tax on capital gains (capital gains tax). According to the

American law the farmer is a person engaged in agricultural activity for gaining profit.

The regulations, however, contain special restrictions on enjoying preferences of special

benefits for some farmers. In turn, Canadian agriculture is treated like any other

business, except that the tax law contains special conditions for agricultural activity

(Canada Revenue Agency, 2013). Agricultural activity should be conducted as a sole

proprietorship or agricultural partnership. Income obtained from outside of the

agricultural industry (e.g. running a wild nature reserve, production of maple syrup),

but connected with it is also recognized when applying preferential taxation on

agriculture. In order to determine the amount of income there are allowed cash basis as

well as accrual basis, however, with certain restrictions; e.g. a farmer is not allowed to

decide on switching from one basis to another.

Applying public burdens to the income from special branches of the economy in

the same amount as the income from non-agricultural activities should be considered as

legitimate and compatible with the principle of fair taxation (Gomułowicz,2003), whose

basic postulates are equality and universality of taxation. However, a question should be

posed whether equating the taxation on agricultural activities and non-agricultural

business activities will be reflected in increased budget revenues and what impact will it

have on the profitability of farming enterprises. The overall share of personal income

taxes in tax revenues of the states is varied, but on average it amounts to about 20%.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
35
There are states where the share remains substantial (Denmark-50%, Finland and

England-30%), but there are also those in which it remains low (Czech Republic-10%,

Poland-14%, Greece-15%;Table 3).

Table 3. Share of Personal Income Taxes in Overall Tax Revenues in Selected EU


States in 2005-2011 (%)
Country/ 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
years Personal income tax (%)
Anglia 28.8 28.6 29.7 28.5 30.0 28.3 27.9
Austria 22.7 23.2 23.6 24.4 23.4 23.2 23.2
Belgia 28.8 27.9 27.8 28.4 28.0 28.1 28.2
Czechy 12.4 11.8 11.9 10.7 10.8 10.3 10.8
Dania 49.0 50.01 51.8 52.6 55.2 51.2 50.9
Finlandia 30.7 30.3 30.3 30.9 31.2 29.7 29.4
Francja 18.4 17.9 17.5 18.1 18.0 17.8 17.9
Grecja 14.5 14.6 14.8 15.0 16.3 14.0 14.6
Hiszpania 18.6 19.5 21.1 22.3 23.0 22.9 23,7
Holandia 17.5 17.8 19.1 18.4 22.4 21.8 20.9
Irlandia 27.2 27.3 28.1 27.8 27.8 26.9 32.0
Niemcy 20.8 21.3 22.2 23.2 23.1 21.9 21.8
Polska 12.0 13.6 15.0 15.6 14.6 14.0 13.8
Włochy 26.1 26.2 26.4 27.4 27.2 27.5 27.1
Source: own study based on data from Eurostat 2013, Taxation trends in the European Union

Based on the data from Table 3 it can be concluded that the low share of personal

income taxes in countries such as Czech Republic or Poland is caused, among other

things by a slightly different taxation manner of agriculture.

There are about 1.5 million farms functioning in Poland. The majority of farmers

pay the farm tax, but around 35-40 thousand are subject to income tax on special

branches of the agricultural production. Due to the fact that most frequently their

incomes do not exceed the amount free from taxation, they are not obliged to pay this

tax. Over 62% of these taxpayers did not exceed the amount of income free from

taxation (www.mf.gov.pl).

Taking into consideration the year 2012 for instance, income on farm tax

amounted to PLN 1 545.8 million. Unfortunately, this tax falls dependable on rye prices

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
36
which frequently results in a considerable loss in the income of the state (read: local

government units). And so, in 2012 due to a decrease in rye prices the budget lost

around 691.9 million, while various concessions and exemptions amounted to the loss

of nearly PLN 3.6 m. Decisions on concessions and exemptions or decreasing rye prices

are made by the municipal council pursuant to Art. 6 (3) as well as Art.13e of the Act on

farm tax of 15 November 1984.

The Ministry of Finance claims that it is difficult to state what types of

concessions are practised by the council and what the results are, but according to

estimates the biggest share in the income loss is attributed to the exemptions on lands

of inferior quality (class V, VI and VI z) and within the period of 2009 and 2011 they

amounted to respectively PLN 183, 112 and 124 million. Concessions on investments

depleted budget by about respectively PLN 53, 33 and 36 million. A significant share can

also be attributed to exemptions of buildings and structures for agricultural producers

from fees and local taxes, which according to estimates amounted to PLN 40 million in

2010, while in 2011 it was around 42 million. Grounds for exemptions are included in

the Act on farm tax and local taxes and fees.

The introduction of income tax on agriculture in the tax system should not affect

increasing tax burdens on farmers and therefore would be irrelevant for the budget. Let

us look at the data. In 2012 farm tax brought the budget PLN 1,545.8 million, while the

revenues from personal income tax are already PLN 70,622 million, and corporate–PLN

31.950 million. The largest share in budget revenues has the value added tax – PLN

120,001 million. It clearly proves that at present it has no significance to the budget.

However, freeing this tax from changes in rye prices and reducing concessions may

become vital.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
37
Propositions for Changes in the Taxation of Farming Enterprises in
Poland

In the proposed project of encompassing farmers with the income tax the

Ministry of Finance has made distinctions between two groups of farmers - poorer and

wealthier, i.e. those whose achieved revenues exceeded PLN 100 thousand in a given

business year. The first group will be exempted from income tax, but would fall under

taxation with the real estate tax. It has been proposed to use twice the rate of that tax

for the undeveloped areas. Such a solution would force cultivation of wastelands. The

second group of farmers would be taxed similarly as business activity but in two

different options. The first is an option based on an already functioning lump-sum tax

on registered revenues. The limit of this form, however, is restricted to the amount of

150 thousand euro with a proposed tax rate at 4%. The second option is taxation on

general principles, applicable to revenues higher than 150 thousand euro.

The proposed project provides including as farms revenues the revenues on

agro-tourism and sales of agricultural products as well as revenues of farmers

conducting small processing activity. Surely, any subsidies to agricultural insurance or

fuel as well as any direct subsidies will not be included as revenues.

Farmers, similarly to income tax payers of the SME sector would obtain the

possibility to deduct social security contributions; in addition, they could use

deductions and concessions provided to the latter individuals.

In order to mitigate the effects of income tax the project envisages applying

income limits to determine the manner of calculating taxes. The proposals of the

transitional period for farmers assume the limit of income, and so, in 2015 it amounts to

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
38
PLN 200 thousand, while in 2016–PLN 150 thousand. The basis for determining those

limits should be recognized revenues from the previous business year.

In Poland currently operate nearly 1.5 million farming enterprises with an area

exceeding 1ha. Average farming area amounts to 11.2 hectares (ha). As many as 862

thousand are small farms whose land area does not exceed 5 ha. Half of the enterprises

in Poland (56% of total households) annually create the agricultural output value of no

more than 4 thousand euros (up to PLN 16 thousand). Unfortunately, only one in four

farming enterprises (26%) achieves output value of over 8 thousand euros (around PLN

32 thousand). As many as 1.36 million households enjoy the use of direct subsidies

(Central Statistical Office of Poland, 2014).

Looking at these figures it is not difficult to imagine that burdening income from

agriculture with personal income tax may not bring revenues such as those from farm

tax, which is paid by fairly all farmers. A study conducted in 2008 (Wasilewski and

Gruziel, 2008) showed that within the mentioned period the farm tax accounted for

nearly 5% of net output of the average farming enterprise. Unfortunately, smaller farms

ended up with over 5%, while, larger ones (richer) with less than 2%. This means that

the taxation in the form of farm tax, not only does not reduce income disparities of

farms, but deepens them, as small enterprises all the more do not have the resources to

invest and modernize.

In his publications Hanusz (1996) argues that a properly structured farm tax is

the one whose rate falls within 6% and 8% and does not exceed 10% of the average

income per hectare. According to the study in Poland, it is much lower. He also

underlines that due to the fact that production in agriculture is becoming increasingly

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
39
specialized, thus the ratio of rye production to overall production is declining, and

hence the fiscal role of farm tax also is.

Amendments in taxation of farming enterprises in Poland have been postponed

repeatedly. Lately, from 2014 farmers were supposed to remain subject to income tax,

but pressure from agricultural backgrounds resulted in putting reforms off for another

period. According to the survey of recent years (Gance and Wise, 2011) which

concerned introducing the taxation of agriculture with income tax, the majority of

farmers are not interested in changing the tax system, and according to them (35.5% of

respondents), the currently binding one is adequate. However, they have reservations

about the methods of determining the conversion factors, as well as the selection of tax

regions. Some of the farmers (27.7%) agree with the thesis that the tax should be linked

to the achieved income, but should also take into account deductions of labour costs of

the farmer and his family, as well as climatic and soil conditions, and the agricultural

area (25.3 % of respondents).

Farm tax in its current form (linear) primarily serves large and medium-sized

farming enterprises. The amount of tax burden is disproportionate to the income (see

above). Small farms are loaded to a greater degree and less richer, hence the

introduction of income tax would be fairer.

Taxation of income from special branches of agricultural production has already

been functioning in Poland and it poses no major problems. The entities are generally

high-yield farming enterprises, where simplified accounting records as well as tax

returns are not a problem. This implies that applying such rules to all farmers would be

possible.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
40
Economists increasingly criticize procrastinating reforms of the tax system, as

the farm tax does not motivate to develop. Polish agriculture at the present stage of

development needs the introduction of income tax, the more that aside from Romania

all other European countries already changed the rules of taxation many years ago.

Polish farmers' resistance is associated primarily with the lack of ability to keep

records of agricultural activities as well as fears of higher tax burdens, fears of the

unknown. The introduction of income tax would surely increase the burdens on farmers

with high income. Small farming enterprises in vast majority would pay no income tax,

due to very low income. The legislator intends to introduce a simplified form of records

for taxation purposes, and tax in the form of lump-sum or general principles is left to be

chosen by farmers.

According to European countries, where taxation of agriculture has been

functioning for years, the agriculture should be encumbered with the aforementioned

taxes: income tax, value added tax and property wealth tax. Both the economists and the

Ministry of Finance are of the opinion that burdening income from agricultural activities

with income tax should not result in an increased fiscal burdens. Looking at the

experience of taxation in special branches of agricultural production, one can

confidently say that the introduction of income tax in the remaining agricultural

industry should pose major problems neither with records (usually simplified) nor tax

deduction.

It is obvious that the tax system which binds the volume of taxes with the size of

income is considered to be more equitable among the society. There are proposals to

introduce various categories of farming enterprises. The first comprises small farms

producing for own needs, which should remain tax exempt (most frequently they lack

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
41
revenue). The second group comprises already larger, family-run entities of a

marketable production. Such enterprises are based to a small degree on wage labour

and in majority on the work of family members. It would therefore be appropriate to

introduce a flat-rate income tax with simplified records. The third group would include

farming entities with a large scale of output based on wage labour. Such farms should be

taxed in the same way as the remaining business activity, as usually they are individuals

achieving very high income.

The taxation of agriculture applying income tax should comply with the

principles of universality and fairness of fiscal burdens. Taking over the part of income

by the state and its redistribution for common weal are the objectives for which the tax

is introduced. The state should realize various objectives from these incomings which

comprises income tax, such as supporting investments and family-run farming

enterprises or a family policy and many others.

The Risk of Introducing Income Tax on Farming Enterprises

The introduction of income tax on Polish farming enterprises on the one hand

will attempt to organize and unify the tax system, and on the other endeavour to treat

this sector of the economy on the very same principles as other business activities. The

income tax should stimulate agricultural activities to modernization and development.

Unfortunately, the mere change in tax regulations may not result in an appropriate

development and growth of investments in agriculture, especially in smallest farms; it is

therefore necessary to obtain support from the state as well as various agricultural

associations or the EU institutions.

As shown in Table 4, investments in provinces with high fragmentation and

predominance of small farms are minor (Małopolskie, Podkarpackie, Świętokrzyskie),

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
42
hence the need to support these agricultural areas. In provinces with predominantly

large farming enterprises (western regions of Poland - Lubuskie, Zachodniopomorskie,

Opolskie, Wielkopolskie) the expenditure on investments in development is several

times higher. Eliminating disparities in development and modernization of the

agriculture in Poland is the objective of numerous programmes of not only state

authorities, but also the authorities of the European Community. Joint actions have

already delivered certain results in the form of increasing the competitiveness of Polish

agriculture on global markets, however, they should intensify through aiding mainly

small farms.

Table 4. Investment Expenditure in Farms in Poland per Province (million PLN)


Investment expenditure
Province Per 1 ha of agricultural Per farming enterprise Per working
land person
dolnośląskie 271.4 2,580.5 3,081.8
kujawsko - pomorskie 257.5 3,179.0 2,583.1
lubelskie 225.3 1,302.4 1,070.5
lubuskie 237.6 2,729.2 3,616.6
łódzkie 268.0 1,584.7 1,505.3
małopolskie 243.6 565.3 615.0
mazowieckie 357.8 2,698.1 2,488.9
opolskie 369.1 5,131.3 4,050.2
podkarpackie 201.9 515.9 544.2
podlaskie 258.8 2,642.9 2,215.8
pomorskie 299.2 4,046.1 3,616.9
śląskie 314.8 915.0 1,408.8
świętokrzyskie 211.7 816.0 764.6
warmińsko - mazurskie 210.3 3,355.6 3,414.2
wielkopolskie 358.8 3,952.9 3,100.1
zachodniopomorskie 206.8 3,859.9 4,133.1
Source: own study based on GUS (2012).

One of the methods to support small farms is the Rural Development Plan 2014 -

2020. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development provides farmers with

activities in the form of financial assistance, through which can benefit those possessing

enterprises of low income and scant production capacity. These numerous activities

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
43
comprise restructuring small farms and modernization of farming enterprises, creating

agricultural producers groups alongside organic farming and bonuses for start-ups in

non-agricultural activity; others would include agricultural program dedicated for

environment and climate, consulting and quality schemes for agricultural products and

foodstuffs as well as transfer of knowledge and innovation and the LEADER approach.

Increasingly, small farms create or join producers groups, as it offers them an

ability to sell their crops at sufficiently high prices and make purchases of the means of

production for the whole group at relatively low prices. In some Polish regions farmers

as parts of these groups have been making collective purchases for some years, which

results in real savings and increases profitability that, in turn, accumulates funds for

investment. These groups assist one another in lowering production costs, reducing

business risk in case of sudden drop in demand2.

Another type of support is the system of direct payments. In 2015, under the

direct support, owners of small farms can benefit from direct subsidies in the new

system called 'payments for small farms ". The maximum amount of all payments must

not exceed 1,250 Euros per farm. Payments usually occur in the form of a lump-sum.

Under the framework of Cohesion Policy (within the Regional Operational

Programmes) there are also obtained funds to support small farms. These actions

comprise co-financing the reorientation of farmworkers and their family members in

order to include hidden labour resources in rural areas in non-agricultural labour

market. This action is aimed at reducing social exclusion of rural residents, as well as

2The statutory purpose of GPR activity is a joint organization of sales in order to enter the market and achieve better
conditions of collaboration with customers. The number of groups is still growing - in 2002 there were 70, while in
2012 - 985. They achieve better results and quality of production, and also easier overcome the difficulties of
production sales as well as receive public financial aid. They can count on support under the Rural Development Plan.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
44
expediting structural changes in agriculture and increasing the competitiveness of

Polish agriculture.

'The strategy of sustainable rural development, agriculture and fisheries for the

years 2012 - 2020' as a general objective indicates the improvement of life quality in

rural areas, and also the efficient use of rural resources for a sustainable development of

the country. Specific objectives of this programme include employment and

entrepreneurship, the quality of human capital and the increase in productivity and

competitiveness of the agro-food sector as well as food security and protection of the

environment.

Supporting small-scale farmers will reduce the risk attached to conducting

farming activities, while on the other hand the risk of lack of tax collection from these

farms. Better operating farms as well as greater production value mean the opportunity

to reduce hazards of activity, particularly those connected with nature and climate, as

farms will possess the funds to insure against climatic conditions, which, in

consequence reduce the need for state aid in the occurrence of adverse conditions to

farms such as flooding, drought, hail, diseases of farm animals, etc., which in recent

years are increasing in Poland.

Supporting small-scale farmers will reduce the risk attached to conducting farm

activities, while on the other hand the risk of lack of tax collection from these farms.

Better operating farms as well as greater production value means the opportunity to

reduce hazards of activity, particularly those connected with nature and climate, as

farms will possess the funds to insure against climatic conditions and thus it will reduce

the need for state aid in the occurrence of adverse conditions to farms such as flooding,

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
45
drought, hail, diseases of farm animals, etc. which are increasing in Poland in recent

years.

State supports, however, ought to be prudent and thoughtful, because farmers

can transfer most of the risk of activity on it, as often is the case at present. Just over 80

out of 1.5 million farms insured in 2015 against drought, which had devastating effects

on many farming enterprises during last summer. The state budget has to allocate

around PLN 400 million to eliminate the consequences. These are not the means

obtained from farm tax, as it feeds the income of local government units and the units, in

turn, exempt many farmers from this tax; hence an absurd situation arises because the

budget (local government units) not only does not have any income, but it still has to

pay out significant amounts of aid.

Summary

Family-run farming enterprises in the European Union are the most common

form of agriculture activity. Each country should strive to ensure that they are primarily

modern, competitive and environmentally friendly, and also that the youth remain in

rural areas and run the enterprises in order for the rural communities to prosper.

Family-run entities are subject to the same regulations as all family companies. They

remain subject to succession and various risks as well as achieve revenues and incur

costs, hence they should also remain subject to a similar taxation.

The vast majority of farms in Poland are small, family-run entities which face

difficulty with modernization and development. A functioning simplified tax system

does not affect the social and economic development of Polish agriculture. The system

requires concerted and fundamental reforms, as it does not fulfil the fiscal function.

Proposals to introduce new principles of taxation should take into account the

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
46
specificity of businesses and stimulate farming enterprises to development and

investment. The principles of the EU Common Agricultural Policy prohibit the state

granting additional support for agriculture.

Farm tax in Poland neither provides great means to local government units, nor

remains an instrument that could boost the development of farming entities. There are

no built-in incentives to invest in development and modernization of farms. This tax

does not foster entrepreneurship of farmers, as the vast majority of enterprises are

heavily burdened with taxation. Lack of binding income with taxation produces

excessive burden on small farming enterprises that do not have resources necessary to

develop and increase competitiveness; this badly motivates the development of

entrepreneurship in rural areas too. Currently, factors such as land and production

increasingly concentrate in farming enterprises larger in terms of area. These are

developing farms that are run by young farmers and possess the characteristics of

enterprises. A display of entrepreneurship in agriculture is also producers' groups that

not only reduce costs, but increase the competitiveness of enterprises at the same time.

Besides an individual one appears also a team entrepreneurship in agriculture. The

introduction of income tax may be an incentive for farmers to increase it, which in the

final result increase their income, as is in the case of the special sectors of agriculture

which remain subject to income tax.

Analyzing tax systems of the EU countries, it can be concluded that the majority

of countries applied income tax to agriculture, as with other types of business activities,

yet using preferential tax treatment for this sector of the economy. These preferences

are directed primarily to small farms in order to support their growth and increase

competitiveness. Only Poland has a different tax system for agriculture in the form of

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
47
farm tax, which does not make the amount of tax burdens conditional on profitability.

The exception is the special sectors of agriculture, which are taxed on the basis of

income tax. This also remains a different solution from existing in the EU countries.

Taxation of units operating within the special branches of agricultural

production is based on entirely different principles than taxation of the remaining

agricultural activity. These units remain subject to income tax. Particularly noteworthy

is the settlement of entities that remain subject to personal income tax. In this case, the

right solution is the facility to choose the way of settlement. Due to favourable estimate

standards tax settlement on general basis remains less popular - less than 1% of

taxpayers choose this possibility 3.

References

Canada Revenue Agency (2013), Farming Income 2013. Retrieved from:


http://www.craarc.gc.ca/E/ pub/tg/t4003/-e.html.

EU (2013), "Taxation trends in the European Union", Eurostat 2013.

Ganc M. and Mądra M. (2011), Sprawiedliwość opodatkowania rolnictwa oraz możliwości zmian
w tym zakresie w opinii rolników indywidualnych, Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie,
"Ekonomika i Organizacja Go-spodarki Żywnościowej”, No. 89, SGGW, Warszawa.

Gomułowicz, A. (2003), Zasada sprawiedliwości podatkowej w orzecznictwie Trybunału


Konstytucyjnego, Warszawa.

Grądalski, F. (2006), System podatkowy w świetle teorii optymalnego opodatkowania, Szkoła


Główna Handlowa, Warszawa.

Gruziel, K. (2008), Stan i kierunki zmian w opodatkowaniu gospodarstw rolniczych,


wydawnictwo SGGW Warszawa.

GUS (2007), "Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2007", i Obszarów Wiejskich, Warszawa: Główny
Urząd Statystyczny,

3See writing of the Minister of Finance of the 6 April 2011 addressed to the Speaker of the Senate (ref. PK3/0602/7/
20/ JPC/ BMI9/3244/11) on the draft on amendments to the Act on Income Tax on individuals, www.senat.pl.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
48
GUS (2011a), "Raport z wyników Powszechnego Spisu Rolnego 2010", Warszawa: Główny
Urząd Statystyczny.

GUS (2011b), "Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2011", Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

GUS (2012), "Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2012", Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

GUS (2014), "Rocznik Statystyczny 2014", Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

Hanusz, A. (1996), Polityka podatkowa w zakresie różnicowania obciążeń dochodów rolniczych,


Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin. Retrieved from:
http://www.kpmg. com/global/en/services/tax/tax-tools-and-
resources/pages/individual-income-tax-ratestable.aspx,

Martin and Jacob (2012), Agro pod lupą, raport, dla EFL

Monel-Mugurel, Jitea (2010), "Personal Agricultural Income Taxation. A Comparative Analysis


between Several New Member States", Bulletin UASVM Horticulture, No 67( 2):142.

OECD (2005), Le sector agricole, Fiscalite et securite social, Paris: Organization of Economic
Cooperation and Development.

Ogrodnik, D. (2009), "Podatek rolny w krajach europejskich", ZER, No 3/2009:108, Warzawa.

Podstawka, M. (2000), "System podatkowy w rolnictwie", wyd. SGGW: 52-53.

Rivoli, J. (1965), "Niech żyje podatek", Paryż: 45, Warszawa.

Wasilewski, M. and Gruziel K. (2008), "Podatek rolny a podatek dochodowy w gospodarstwach


rolniczych – konsekwencje zmian dla gospodarstw rolnych", tom 94, Wieś i Rolnictwo
No.2, Warszawa.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 24 - 49
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
49
Human Capital and Productivity in the Sinaloa
Commercial Family Businesses
Fabiola Ponce Durán
Universidad de Occidente
Culiacán, Sinaloa, México
Email: fabiolaponceduran@gmail.com
Marcela Rebeca Contreras Loera
Universidad de Occidente
Culiacán, Sinaloa, México
Email: marcelac25@hotmail.com
Abstract
Commercial family businesses are part of an open system that establish an ongoing relationship
between the structure of the organization, objectives, people, environment and resources,
adapting to changing needs which is required in the competitive environment. The paper shows
results of the study that seeks to identify human factors that affect the level of productivity of
family businesses in Sinaloa. It proposed a model that reflects relationships between these
factors and productivity. Data collection was carried out with 209 respondents, and analyzed
with a special constructed structural equation model. The results show that in a model of
human factors that affect the level of productivity, behavior involves psychological and
psychosocial processes that influence the performance of individuals and groups, increasing or
decreasing the level of productivity of individuals, group of individuals and own organization.
Three levels of analysis have been adopted that reflect the continuous interaction and mutual
influence between each dimension. Based on the structural equation model, the paper concludes
that among the three factors, individual factors have the highest correlation.

Key words: family business, human capital, human factors, productivity.


JEL codes: M10, M12

Introduction

Given the current economic situation facing the new competitive environment,

companies must optimize their operations by focusing their efforts on activities and

practices which constitute the essence of their value. This is also valid for family

businesses since business efficiency can only be achieved by maximizing the value

added in each of these activities, and by finding the best way to combine and select their

resources.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
50
In this regard, in recent decades, the concern of employers has been to obtain a

useful advantage, identifying, developing and protecting organizational resources, and

thereby, to develop sustainable advantages over their competitors. Not all enterprise

resources are likely to bring such sustainability, but only those that are highly valuable

and scarce (Barney, 1991; Grant, 1996) and last in time (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993).

The company's resources must include intangibles assets, especially the human

resource, as it is the most critical and important factor for the success of the company.

Despite the importance of human resource (HR) for the competitiveness of the

company, few studies have been done specifically on the analysis of human factors, e.g.

human capital management, affecting the level of productivity of family businesses.

Most studies have been mainly conducted on large companies.

Since there are organizations where ownership and involvement of the family in

the business are important, HR practices are developed in a particular way (De Kok, et

al., 2006). The orientation of HR practices can range broadly from a clear inclination

towards family members in selection decisions, promotion, compensation and

succession, to the detriment of employees without family ties, to a search for fairness in

the application of human resource practices to equalize rights and obligations to

employees of the company.

Efficiency in the utilization of HR in the family business depends, therefore, on

the balance in the direction of such practices, which will determine, in general,

satisfaction, motivation and involvement of employees (relatives or not), in the

business. If this balance exists, the family business will have the opportunity to leverage

their human capital from considering it as a cost to make it as a source of sustainable

competitive advantage.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
51
The study has two main objectives, namely to identify human factors that from

the perspective of the store managers and assistant managers which affect the level of

productivity of commercial family business in Sinaloa, and to propose a model that

reflects the relationships between these factors and the level of productivity.

Theoretical Framework

Human capital has been recognized as an important factor that adds value to

business organizations/companies. The business organizations must know the

resources and capabilities they have and they must learn how to use their resources.

The companies should be able to identify or to develop their skills and knowledge in

such a way that differentiates them from their competitors and they also should

highlight the distinctive characters of the people who work in their companies. All these

are needed to form their competitive advantages. Stewart (1998: 9-10) defines

intellectual capital as “the sum of all the knowledge possessed by all employees of a

company and give it a competitive advantage..is intellectual material –knowledge,

information, experience– you can leverage to create wealth“.

Recent studies suggest that the attributes of human capital such as education,

experience and skills of employees and managers, positively affect firm performance

(Hitt, et al., 2001). In modern organizations, human capital provides distinctive features

that make it valuable for organizations. Therefore, human capital is regarded as firms'

main intangible asset value generator (Hatch and Dyer, 2004). The knowledge,

capacities, attitudes, skills, individual psychological and psychosocial aspects are

important features for productive activity and they interact with other assets and the

environment, which manifest their influence on the level of productivity. Currently,

business organizations or companies recognize human resources as a source of

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
52
competitive advantage and the main concern now is how to measure their influence on

the level of productivity.

A simple definition of productivity adopted in this study is the indicator of how

well resources are being used in an organization in the process of production of goods

and services. Therefore, productivity refers to the relationship between the resources

used and the products obtained and indicate the efficiency with which resources are

being used to produce goods and services for the market.

When it comes to measure the level of productivity of the HR, it refers to

subjective aspects, which make its measurement more complex, and this has led several

authors to use variables based on the perception of the people involved. This subjective

method to measure the level of productivity has been used primarily for non-parametric

indicators based on the appreciation of the participants in the production process.

Mexico has undergone major transformations in economic structure from the

mid to late nineties. The global process of market liberalization and especially the

signing of the trade agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the United States of

America (USA), were among other factors the trigger for a strong performance across

the country's economy, especially in the retail sector. The sector is of a great importance

for the Mexican economy, not only in the form of its contribution to gross domestic

products (GDP), but as an important source of employment generation, thereby having

a multiplier effects in the form of increasing welfare in the country.

When speaking of productivity in the retail sector, it becomes more complex in

its calculation due to the particular characteristics of the sector: the heterogeneity of

products produced and/or services offered; concentration in one area of various

products; little contribution to value added; low or marginal productivity of labor that

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
53
resulting in lower real wages (e.g Achabal, 1984; Mishra, 2011). This problem led many

researchers to use different methods and indicators to measure more objectively the

results of the operations performed by area and activity. Such studies mainly aimed at

measuring tangible aspects such as sales per square meter, waste reduction, rotation of

merchandise, gross margin, among others, without delving into those human factors

that make possible the achievement of the objectives.

In this research, human factors affecting the level of productivity of business

ventures and the relationships that exist between the factors were analyzed and a

structural equation model was developed to explain these relationships. The concern of

this study was to seek other ways to measure the performance of the store managers to

contemplate perceptions of those aspects of human factor affecting the current level of

productivity. It is not the measurement of productivity in the conventional way, but the

study looks for other ways that consider the human factor as a variable in the

measurement, assuming that as people contribute to improving the level of productivity

either individually or in groups, will increase the organization's productivity as a whole.

The aim of the study then is to present an alternative way of measuring productivity by

taking into account subjective aspects based on perception of HR (in this case, the

respondents).

For family businesses, it is a big challenge to understand human behavior in

order to incorporate strategies, to understand and address the psychological and

psychosocial dimensions of the individuals within them, as well as to improve the

organization-individual relationship.

There were two main reasons that this study chose store manager and assistant

manager as the human factors. First, the increasing dynamism of the retail trade in

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
54
recent decades, which has increased significantly its contributions to the country's GDP

and job creation. Second, the lack of studies on the performance of human resources

systematically and objectively, and on indicators which are more tied to the

characteristics of the human being relating to their production activities to achieve

specific measurement purposes. This lack presents an area of interest in the existing

literature on generating new ways in measuring the level of productivity of human

factor.

The heterogeneous nature of the products and services in the retail sector and

the need to use various easily measurable indicators that show the achievement of

objectives that the company is set per area and per unit, has led to the need to create

market-based indicators and mostly financial returns, leaving aside the measurement of

the performance who manages the production unit.

On the other hand, the increase interest that is now being given to human capital

as a component of intangible assets with distinctive features that has high value has

made businesses to put more attention and emphasis on the conservation of HR capital

as its most valuable resource.

Finally, the shortage of methods for measuring productivity that

comprehensively consider the subjective aspects of the human factor is one of the

reasons to undertake this study.

Consider the business organization as a set of carefully sorted items with mutual

interactions between them gives the impression of a whole system working for a

specific purpose (e.g. generating profit), which is susceptible to what happens in its

environment. Therefore, doing this research with the mentioned approach, based on the

idea initiated by Bertanlanfy (1986), was considered as a set of interacting elements.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
55
This idea is reinforced by the opinion of Katz and Kahn (1986) that the organization is

considered as a composition of elements that keeps each other in a reciprocal

relationship where humans and other organizational elements interact with each other

within the organization social system and, with the external environment, to realize

certain predetermined objectives.

In this sense, the relationships involve socio-psychological variables of behaviors

at the individual and group, and between groups where end results depend on the

activities of people organized for that purpose.

Method

To achieve the objectives of the study, methodologically, the study was based on

quantitative, descriptive and transversal approaches. Due to the subjective nature of the

research variables, the main instrument to obtain information was a survey using a

semi-structured questionnaire with total respondents: 209 store managers and

assistant managers from two companies owned by two different families. In order to

ensure the reliability and suitability of data collected from the survey in the Sinaloa

context, the used instrument was validated in content with the own opinions of local

experts and processed with the technique of matching Kendall.

As measuring the level of productivity is a complex process when it comes to

assess many subjective aspects of the human being, the use of nonparametric methods

in the measurement was then justified in this research. For the selection of indicators of

productivity of manager and assistant managers, the respondents were asked about

their own opinions or perceptions about the management processes in their companies

and related aspects that they consider very important, in order to evaluate their

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
56
productivity in relation to their human factors. The selected indicators were: turnover,

inventory turnover and growth in stores.

From the review of existing key literature, it was found that many researchers

have studied the impact of human factors on the level of productivity, and they

proposed a range of human variables. For instance, Fernandez-Rivers and Sánchez

(1997) and Cequea (2012) gave a list of 35 variables. For this study, based on the

literature, a list of human variables affecting productivity was selected and compiled,

and underwent expert judgments for the adequacy of these variables to the local

context.

For the analysis of data collected from the survey, a system of structural

equations was used as a statistical tool to develop a model using the software Lisrel. The

model incorporates elements of productivity based on own perception of the

respondents on issues that affect their performance. The used structural equation

model is the methodological contribution of this study which relates variables that deal

with human behavior in the workplace and productivity.

Sinaloa’s Family Businesses

As explained before, a field research/survey was conducted on 209 store

managers and assistant managers of two different family retail businesses (A and B)

located in the state of Sinaloa, Mexico, with the following profile: male (74%), level of

education degree (76%), age between 30 and 50 years old (55%) and seniority of 2-5

years (43%). Companies “A” and “B, are family businesses whose principal activity is the

marketing of products in supermarkets. The firms have been operating for over twenty

years in the local market in the Sinaloa with a stable economy. After a long period of

being unique in the format of grocery stores in its beginnings, and then became

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
57
supermarkets, both companies “A” and “B” lay the foundations for growth and meeting

the challenge of globalization.

Company A was established in 1943 as a grocery and later it became a rapid

expanding company. In 1948 it started business diversification with the opening of a

specialized store for selling construction materials, furniture and electrical appliances

business. The first retail store was opened in the sixties, introducing models forefront of

customer service, and expanded at different strategic points to be closer to the

consumer. In the seventies in Sinaloa, the company consolidated its presence in the field

of construction, livestock and supermarkets. In the eighties and nineties it resumed

growth strategy by adopting new and modern store formats, as sustainable growth

became the formula for progress and survival in the highly competitive context, in 1999

the company associated with the Sacramento group to sell its 50% shares. With this, it

allowed the company to start its expansion throughout the state of Sinaloa. In 2007, the

company had an annual growth of 18% through establishing stores with 1,800 square

meters in locations with 25,000 inhabitants on average, earned $200 million US dollars

a year and employed 3,300 people.

Today, this family company has become one of the most important regional

companies in the form of creating decent and secure jobs. The company is managed by

three generations of directors who have called equal (Alfonso Zaragoza III). In 2014 the

company has 43 supermarkets, 7 furniture stores and 3 companies in the construction

field in the state of Sinaloa.

The origin of company B was back in 1954 when the patriarch of a family from

Asian immigrants and their children, established a distribution business of butter in the

city of Culiacan, Sinaloa. The company was founded as a small wholesale and grain

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
58
stores selling groceries and supplies to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and final

consumer goods at affordable prices to the working class. This was the basis for the

emergence in years later of company B (Contreras, 2007). By 1967, the company

opened two branches in Guamuchil, another municipality of Sinaloa and one more in

Culiacan. On the death of the founder in 1969, his six sons took over the company; who

driven growth through a self-service system which was already implemented by

company A, and opened its first store in 1970.

By 1978 company B has already 18 stores located in the state of Sinaloa and two

in Sonora. The late eighties gave the basis for the company's growth strategy and

consolidation. In 1981 it associated with Safeway Stores (a big supermarket chain in the

United States), marking a watershed in the history of the company. As a result of this

alliance, the company has grown significantly and now it has around 200

establishments in various formats, distributed in 12 states of the northwest and

western Mexico.

The company has also ventured into other activities such as agriculture, food

industry, vehicle trade, restaurants and real estate developments; forming a

consolidated corporate group which together generated 2600 million dollars a year and

about 30,000 jobs. Another important feature of the company is that it uses a variety of

formats for its supermarkets characterized by the size and customer orientation

(hypermarket, express, super, super wholesale).

For more than four decades the company has been a family business with the

most brand value and strong market position The company B is currently managed by

the third generation of the family, who owned around 51% of family capital in the

company. With respect to the succession, the company is prepared to move successfully

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
59
through generational change by providing training and advices on how to carry it the

succession, and by helping define how to organize properly the succession process in

the company. This is considered very important because the core family who

established the company has many sons, and each of them has his own family and each

family has its own needs for work and many of them have developed their own family

businesses

Both company B and A represent a symbol of family company characterized by

work and values identified in Culiacan culture. They are suppliers of products and

services for family consumption and they generate jobs in different ranges. Their logos

are part of the urban culture of the region, and they are highly respected by the local

population especially by the elders.

At present, both company A and company B are immersed in a heavy market

competition, which has led them to implement strategies in order to compete in an

aggressive market. These two local companies have managed to transform themselves

to modern commerce companies by changing market demand driven by global forces.

Both companies have managed successfully to adapt to increasing competition through

partnerships that enable them to face challenges from large market participants, both

foreign and Mexican.

Results and Discussion

According to the findings of literature review on human factors affecting

productivity, a theoretical model that shows the relationships that occur in the context

of a product organization of actions of people in their interactions at work.

The model was based on the theory of organizational behavior on human

behavior in organization, its nature and processes to improve the performance of

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
60
organizations. This behavior involves psychological and psychosocial processes that

influence the performance of individuals and groups, and productivity of individual,

group and organization (Robbins and Judge 2009). Three levels of analysis, according to

different authors, was adopted to reflect the continuous interactions and mutual

influences that exist between each dimension. Each level represents the impact that

individuals exercise in the productivity of the three factors, i.e. individual, group and

organization.

The propose for this research a theoretical model suggests that there is a direct

and positive relationship on productivity, and it was compared statistically with the

system of structural equations by simultaneous analysis of selected variables in order to

demonstrate that the proposed theoretical model is consistent with the data obtained

from the field survey. Figure 1 shows the structural model that resulted from the

empirical evaluation, which indicates that the correlations between the variables

analyzed are positive.

Regarding specific results of the structural model, significant arrows between the

model variables suggest the following relationships: in individual factors, motivation,

job satisfaction and competence are issues with individual dimension; that directly

affect the level of productivity (0.32). In the group factors, participation, teamwork and

conflict management are classified in group size and directly influence the level of

productivity (0.21). In organizational factors, organizational culture, leadership and

organizational climate correspond to the organizational dimension and indirectly

influence the level of productivity (0.31).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
61
Figure 1. Results of the Constructed Structural Model

Source: author’s own elaboration.

With these results, it can be said that the proposed theoretical model is valid in

that individual, group and organizational factors have positive correlations with the

level of productivity. Furthermore, covariances among these factors are equal

significantly positively.

Using a structural equation system through LISREL 8.8 software enabled the

development of a model of productivity of human factors in the commercial sector. The

estimates of the equation are shown in Table 1. The first line corresponding to the

productivity equation, presents a linear combination of the individual, group and

organizational factors, in which each multiplied by the estimated regression coefficients

(0.322) (0.213) and (0.308) respectively, and associated with a measurement error. The

second line corresponds to each of the latent variables standard error. The third line

shows the t statistic (coefficient/standard error of each factor) that allows the null

hypothesis that the parameter is null.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
62
Table 1. Estimates of the Constructed Structural Equation Model
Estimated Equation Error variance R²
Productivity = 0.322*X1 + 0.213*X2 + 0.308*X3 0.170 0.749
Standard error (0.247) (0.131) (0.172) (0.0509) 3.344
t 1.301 1.625 1.790

Note: X1,X2 and X3 are resp. individual, group and organizational factors

Source: author’s own elaboration.

With respect to the individual factors, the obtained measurement indicates that a

positive change in individual factors leads to an increase in the level of productivity by

0.322. A positive change in the group factors has the least positive impact on the level of

productivity with 0.213, whereas, an increase in the organizational factors will increase

the level of productivity by 0.308. The standard error, shown in the second line (e.g.

0.247 for the individual factors), indicates the accuracy of the estimated coefficient: the

smaller is the estimated coefficient, the more accurate is the measurement. The third

line shows the value of t obtained by dividing the value of the estimated coefficients by

the standard errors. For instance, with respect to the individual factors: 0.322/0.247 =

1.301, which is greater than 2.57 for a significance of p = 0.01, (or confidence level of

99%; Z  = 2.57); so the variables are significantly associated with proposed

constructs.

According to the above results, it appears that individual factors have the

greatest influence on the level of productivity of commercial companies studied.

Variables such as motivation, job satisfaction and competence acquire meaning in the

context of corporate self.

To determine to what extent the assumed model fits the sample data, the model

was evaluated on the quality of global adjustment (Goodness-of-fit Test). Three types of

test are used in this study, namely absolute fit, incremental fit index and parsimony

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
63
adjustment index (Manzano and Zamora, 2009; Arias, 2008; Ruiz, 2008; Cea (2004).

Figure 2 shows the path diagram tested with LISREL 8.8 software model.

The main results of the model are shown in Table 2 with absolute fit indices

RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Aproximation): 0.049; SRMR (Standardized Root

Mean Square Residual): 0.0559; GFI (Goodness of Fit Index): 0.886; NFI (Normed Fit

Index): 0.955; and CN (Critical N): 191,885; all tests indicate a reasonable fit of the

model. Incremental fit indexes show favorable values, i.e. NNFI (Nonnormed Fit Index):

0.981; CFI (Comparative Fit Index): 0984; and IFI (Incremental Fit Index): 0.984; all

suggest that the model is accepted. Regarding rates acceptance model parsimony, the

test results suggest some reservations, with indicators AGFI (Adjusted Goodness of Fit

Index): 0.883, and PGFI (Parsimony GFI): 0.682. A model is perfectly fit when an exact

correspondence between the matrix reproduced by the model and observations matrix

is given. For this purpose, the two most commonly used measures are the chi statistical

( 2) and likelihood ratio index and the index of goodness of fit (GFI)

Figure 2 Solution of the proposed model

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
64
Table 2. Fit Indicators of the Proposed Model
Type of Acceptance
Statistical Model values Criterion
Adjustment value
 = 318.551
2
Absolutes (Satorra-Bentler) p > 0.05 No acceptance
(p=0.000)
SRMR < 0.05 0.0559 Poor adjustment
GFI > 0.90 0.886 Regular adjustment
NFI > 0.90 0.955 Correct estimation
Incremental

NNFI > 0.90 0.981 Correct estimation


CFI > 0.90 0.984 Correct estimation
IFI > 0.90 0.984 Correct estimation
 = 318.551
22
Ratio / gl 1 < / gl < 2 Acceptance
gl = 211 =1.509
Parsimony

AGFI > 0.90 0.883 Poor adjustment


Adjustment
PGFI > 0.90 0.682
mediocre
RMSEA < 0.05 0.0495 Acceptance
CN > 200 191.885 Poor adjustment
Source: own calculation

Summary

The main aim of this research is to identify human factors of commercial family

business that influence the level of productivity, and to propose a model of productivity

measurement. The study was conducted in two family-owned commercial companies in

the state of Sinaloa, Mexico, with store managers and assistant managers as the

respondents. Three different dimensions of analysis (individual, group and

organizational factors) were adopted to identify the human factor and it obeyed the

psychological and psychosocial processes that form the interaction of the individual at

work.

The results of this study confirm of the important of the human factors in

influencing the level of productivity. Factors such as motivation, job satisfaction,

cohesion, training and development, teamwork, participation, leadership, organizational

culture and environment were found as the important determinants of productivity..

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
65
The structural equation model developed for this study in order to measure the

productivity of store manager and assistant managers indicates a positive and direct

relationship between human factors, identified and classified in individual, group and

organizational dimension. The highest correlation was found from the individual factor

with 32% impact on productivity, followed by the organizational factors with a

correlation of 31%.

References

Achabal, D., Heineke, J., and McIntyre, S. (1984), "Issues and Perspectives on Retail
Productivity", Journal of Retailing, 60(3). Fall.

Amit, R., and Schoemaker P.J.H. (1993), "Strategic assets and organizational rent", Strategic
Management Journal, 14(1): 33-46.

Barney, J. (1991), "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of


Management, 17(1): 99-120.

Bertalanffy, L. (1986), "Teoría General de los sistemas", Fundamentos, desarrollos, aplicaciones.


FCE, México.

Cequea, M.M. (2012), "Modelo multifactorial para optimización de la productividad en el


proceso de generación de energía eléctrica: aplicación al caso de las centrales
hidroeléctricas venezolanas", unpublished PhD dissertation, E.T.S.I. Industriales (UPM).
Madrid.

Contreras, M.R. (2007), "La transformación de pequeña a gran empresa: El caso de la


organización sinaloense", unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma
Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa. México.

Fernández-Rios M., and Sánchez J. (1997), Eficacia Organizacional. Concepto, desarrollo y


evaluación. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.

Hatch N., and Dyer J. (2004), "Human Capital and Learning as a Source of Sustainable
Competitive Advantage", Strategic Management Journal, 25:.1155-1178.

Hitt M., Bierman L., Shimizu K., and Kochhar R. (2001), "Direct and Moderating Effects of Human
Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based
Perspective", Academy of Management Journal”, 44: 13-28.

Katz D., and Kahn R.L.(1986), Psicología Social de las Organizaciones, México, Trillas.

Mishra A. (2011), "Retail Productivity: Concept and Analysis for an Emerging Retail Sector",
Working paper No. 336, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.

Robbins S., and Judge T. (2009), Comportamiento Organizacional, Pearson Editores, México City.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 50 - 66
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
66
Sustainable Waste Management and Social Capitals:
The Experience from Landfill Community in
Converting of Waste into Alternative Energy, in
Kendari South East Sulawesi 1
Patta Hindi Asis
Social and Political Science Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Kendari
Kendari Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
E-mail: pattahindi@gmail.com
Ririn Syariani
English Department, Muhammadiyah University of Kendari
Kendari Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
E-mail: ririnsyahriani@yahoo.com
Abstract
Management of waste into alternative energy that blends environmental capital and social
capital has conducted by Independent Community Energy Landfill (TPA) Puwatu District
Kendari South East Sulawesi. In this community, waste can be managed properly because the
cooperation between by local Government and community and mutual trust among the
members.
The qualitative methods through case study approach this study is done that explore the data
with study of literature/libraries, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussion (FGD) in TPA
as partners in waste management activities into energy alternative.
The result shows that waste management into alternative energy has run well because of the
structure is supported by good relation between government as facilitator and the members of
community. Social capitals such as personal interaction, trust and powerful networking in this
community make the program of waste management sustainable that producing methane
brings benefit to community as expected, and has become a pilot project.
As recommendation, it is important to maintain the sustainability of waste management. Since
the program leads to also maintaining social capitals of community; increasing skill of life,
increasing leadership capability, finance skill and networking. Therefore the establishment of
independent energy can be reached and continued as the way of people empowerment. Here the
government should support by making regulation which assure its sustainability without
influenced by leaders changing.
Key words: social capital, landfill community, alternative energy
JEL codes: L44, L50, Q2

1 The article has presented on Bandung Spirit International Conference 30th October 2015 held at Trisakti University
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
67
Background

Environmental discourse always is a trending topic as global climate change

continues happen, which requires human to be aware critically. To maintain the

environmental harmony, sustainable Is crucial since it balances both natural and human

life. This equilibrium can be done by maintaining natural and social capitals. The entity

Will be run well in the form of environment management such as turning waste

(environmental capital) into alternative energy that is supported by social capital due to

maintain human existence. To understand the work of both environmental and social

capitals, it will be described by the landfill community which using the waste to support

their daily lives. For the members of community, waste is a gift and they depend on its.

The waste converted into energy is known as methane, which could be utilized

for lighting and cooking, garbage could contribute some benefits to this community.

This endeavor is a part of the strategy to overcome the lack of fuel as well as the

strengthening of social capital that is changing gradually. Society in Puwatu landfill gets

together to initiate The effort of energy distribution in order to fulfill their daily needs.

Creative works of converting garbages into energy are conducted by the community and

by the lead to positive effects. The energy procurement has helped the society to

overcome their problems due to fuel crisis. The cooperation between government and

society in energy provision is real evidence of the strength of social capital in

community. Garbage management initiated by the society then become an important

part of the relationship between environmental capital and social capital.

Moreover, in the Puwatu landfill community, social activities are tightly

integrated with social networking, trust built among them and social norms. That is also

shown in the way they manage the garbages into alternative energies. Values/norms,

trust and networking abilities either internal or external (with government) has enable
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
68
them to: (1) access more information, (2) coordinate the activities in the best ways and

(3) the continuity of activities.

Social Capital

Discourse on social capital is not a new concept in social sciences. The debate has

already existed over a century, at least if it refers to the early writings in 1916 in the

United States (OECD Insight, undated). Over times, the development of social capital

then becomes hot topic discussed by social scientists, especially in developing countries.

Robert Putnams considers that there is no exact definition of social capital (see

Putnam, Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences). However, Putnam limits the

definition based on his research experiences in the United States as following:

The central idea of social capital, in my view, is that networks and the associated norms
of reciprocity have value. They have value for the people who are in them, and they
have, at least in some instances, demonstrable externalities, so that there are both public
and private faces of social capital…(Putnam, 1)
Social capital relates to networking and mutual reciprocity norm in society.

There is a bond between their values as outlined in both the private space and public

space. In the social space, one definitely has capitals that can be utilized in interaction.

These capitals are then used in interconnected reciprocity. Social capital is joint

network in which norms, values and understanding are shared in the cooperation

among individuals and groups. This definition explains that individual or groups

cooperate. The cooperation can take place in families, colleagues, and other groups by

regarding empathy, understanding, and norms. Klipatrik (2003), quotes the concept of

OECD (2001), he identifies that social capital aims to improve human capital by sharing

knowledge and information through trust and networks. In this respect, Klipatrik agrees

with some previous social capital concepts such as Bourdieu, Putnam and Fukuyama

about the importance of networks and trust.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
69
Similar to Klipatrik, Derek Bacon says that there is no single definitions about

social capital as well as there is no single measurement of it. Yet, it can be formulated in

the form of trust (trust) within an organization or society, social norms, social network

availability, and the combination of all these factors (Bacon 2002: 4-6). In line with

Bacon, Zimmer argues that social capital can be seen in the form of faiths, norms and

social networks. However, he emphasizes more on individual aspects in the groups.

Supporting Putnam’s theory, Zimmer says that face-to-face contact in a group is

significant. Explanation of the capital itself cannot be separated from the contribution of

Marx in his historical dialectic. Marx emphasizes on the structure and economic bases.

Not like Pierre Bourdieu, who does not limit it to the economic capital only but also

social capital, cultural and symbolic. According to him, capital is social relationships.

Capital is social energy that only exists and will only fruitful in struggle condition, where

capital produces and reproduces (Asis 2012, 12). Capital has an energy that is important

in the social arena. Pierre Bourdieu, who sees a more comprehensive social capital,

defines social capital as:

“actual or potential resources which are linked to possession of durable of network of more
or less institutionalized of relationships of mutual acquitance and recognition, or ihen the
other word to membership in a group (Dale dan Newman, 2008).

Common threads that can be drawn from the debates mentioned previously is

that social capital is an actual or potential sources. It can be concluded that social capital

is potential sources own by the society as can be seen from networks, norms, bond, and

trust amongst them either individually or groups. To see to what extend the In line with

it to see how far the influence of success in managing waste in landfill Powatu will be

more focus on the aspects of trust, social networks, norms prevailing in society and

aspects of the more personal the relationship between individuals within the group but

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
70
does not close well in the aspect others will be seen at the time of the study such as the

ability to network, influence elite, etc.

Networks and Trust

The community experience in Puwatu landfill in managing waste is closely

associated with the ability of networking between them and the government. Besides,

the trust built between them and the government also significantly contributed to the

success of the program. According to Sue Kilpatrik, who studies social capital in some

villages in Australia, sees that interactions within and outside the community plays a

role in building a network in the community. Sue recognizes that informal relationships

such as drink tea together, meetings, and discussions are very helpful in shaping

networks (Kilpatrick, 2003).

The ability to build networks is really crucial in the social capital concept.

Bourdieu (Schaefer-McDaniel, 2004) says that social capital consists of two dimensions.

First, social networks and connection/relationship. Second, sociability. Dimensions of

social networking, connections and social skills become adhesive in forming social

capital. In terms of networking, capabilities will form a tighter social capital in the

community. Social networks are constructed by capital ownership of each actor. This

capital can be in the form of economic capital, social capital, cultural capital and

symbolic capital.

In addition to capital networks, friendships and social relationships, the

cornerstone of social capital is the confidence (trust). Francis Yukuyama emphasizes the

importance of confidence in achieving social prosperity and economic progress

(Fukuyama, 2007). Furthermore, according to Fukuyama, social capital is very

important in a society even in a smaller community scale. For Fukuyama, the

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
71
confidence (trust) may be present in the community in a way behave honestly and could

working together according to the values agreed on in the community. He explains:

…trust, thus the hope that arises within a community that behave normal, honest, and
cooperative norms based on shared, in the interests of the other members in the
community. (Fukuyama, 2007)

Trust in society is very important in both the small-scale community and society

on a large scale such as the State. Countries that have a high level of trust tend to be

more advanced and able to survive in the competitive global economy and social.

Fukuyama explains that trust is as important as economic and cultural. According to

him:

Social capital is a capability that arises from the common belief in a society or certain
parts of it. He can be institutionalized in a social group is the smallest and most
fundamental, as well as community groups the most, the State and all other groups that
exist.. (Fukuyama, 2007: 37)

An explanation of social capital is closely related to networking and confidence at

community level, in both the small and the level in the larger society. It is a very

valuable capital in the community to be able to integrate a common goal so that what is

aspired to be realized.

Characteristics of Puuwatu Landfill

Landfill Puuwatu or commonly known as Kampung Mandiri Energi Puuwatu is a

central area of waste collection in Kendari city. This location is the region's largest

garbage disposal and a pilot project of the city government in making use of waste to be

processed into energy. Puuwatu landfill has been build for long time ago but not until in

2009 the program utilization of waste that is processed into methane gas.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
72
Table 1. Charateristics of Puuwatu Landfill
No Items Descriptions
1 Total area 18 ha
2 Number of residents 100 household
3 Occupations Scavenger & Honorary employee of Sanitation
Department
4 Garbage volume/day 120 ton
5 Number of managers 6 persons, 2 of them are honorary employees
Sources: Research result, 2014

Ineraction among individuals and networks

The community in Puwatu landfills, most of which are scavengers and sanitary

service employees, has a high intensity of the meeting so that communication between

neighbors goes well. This is possible to happen because the community has adjancent

houses and are only separated by wood partitions supervisioned by the government

and Asian Central Bank of Kendari. Moreover, intense social interactive also emerge in

religious social activities, such as recitation and community services. Society in this

community mostly has common field of jobs, which are scavengers and staff in sanitary

departments, which enable them to meet every time. It can be said that interpersonal

communication goes well among them.

In general, the community in Puwatu landfill is willing to engage in activities

organized by the government or charity organizations as their main activity is only

scavenging so that they become more active in social activities such as community

services, patrolling, recitation, wedding party, infrastructure building, etc.

The community uses gas for cooking only in the morning, starting at 8:00 to

10:00 am. Afer that, most people spend their time in other activities such as in early

childhood education and group recitation. The most obvious network in the community

is house wifes groups that are really active in participating in their children’s education

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
73
programs. To support learning activities in early childhood education at the landfill, the

government asks house wifes in PKK activities.

Trust Capital

Trust among the community in Puwatu landfill is interwoven even though they

originate from several tribes including Munanesse, Tolakinesse, Buginesse and

Javanese. Communications between them are good because of mutual trust and respect

between people. TPA community Puwatu agrees that trust is important in waste

management.

As the result of rust among them, there have been no conflicts in the use of gas

and social facilties provided by the government. They put common interest in the top

priority than individual interest that results in strong trust among them.

The interesting finding in trust among the Puuwatu landfill community is that

they trust more on banker, garbage manager, volunteers such as teachers and students

rather than on politicians. They would negatively respond to political communities,

especially politics parties. They assume that politicians are egoistic. However, they

show different attitudes to non-government organization (NGO). To these

organizations, they show positive reactions. This indicates that he community still has

trust on government and other NGOs rather than politics parties.

Table 1. Description on Trust in Puuwatu Landfill Community


Trust Yes No
Trust on neighbourhoods 
Trust on government 
Trust on NGOs/volunteers 
Trust on political parties 
Source: Research Finding, 2014

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
74
The importance of alternative energies for local business
sustainability

The utilization of alternative energies is one of ways to deal with the limited

fossil energies. This problem can be solved only if stakeholders, along with the society,

actively participate in building alternative energies resources to support social-

economic activities. According to Prof. Tulus Tambunan from the Center for Industry,

SMEs and Business Competition Studies University of Trisakti, the availability of

alternative energies is crucial for the continuity of activities or businesses of local

community. With the existence of alternative energies, society can be more independent

in terms of energy supply for local economy, therefore they are not depending anymore

on gasoline or others conventional energies (correspondency via email, 2015). Hence,

the use of alternative energies in Kendari should be developed to support and

encourage micro business doers (UKM) so that they can be more independent and not

to merely rely on gasoline supply from outside Kendari.

Conclusion

Community management utilizing social capital plays an important role in

converting waste into alternative energy, although this program was initiated by the

government. The role of government is significant in managing waste in Puuwatu

landfill community. Apart from this, social capital such as networking and trust are

strong among community, marked by how they cooperate and trust each other in the

management of gas from waste.

The Puwatu landfill community emphasizes more on trust and cooperation in

daily interaction and other social activities such as community service, recitation and

involvement in early childhood education. The lack of community building and

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
75
empowerment from the stakeholders in terms of financial management, leadership and

managerial training should be improved in the near future.

Moreover, active participation from the community is needed to convert waste

into alternative energies. It is important to maintain social capital among them.

Therefore, concrete endeavor is required to maintain the social capital to face

globalization. The involvement of religious, educational, and political leaders is

important to continue to build social capital in the community. Furthermore, political

education is also crucial so that there will be no clash or misperception about politics as

happens all the time. This is important to raise community’s awareness of the

importance of politics in achieving common welfare. In overall, the portrait of the

Puuwatu landfill community has been real example of the importance of social capital

building in supporting better environment.

References

Asis, P. H. (2012), "Dominasi Simbolik Karaeng" (dominance of Karaeng symbolic), unpublhed


research paper, University of Gadjah Mada (UGM), D.I. Yogyakarta.

Bacon, D. (2002), "Revitalising Civil Society Through Social Capital Formation in Faith Based
Organisations: Research Finding From Notrhern Ireland, Center for Voluntary Action
Studies, University of Ulster, Coleraine.

Fukuyama, F. (2007). Trust (Edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Qalam.

Kilpatrick, S. (2003), "The Role of VET in Building Social Capital for Rural Community
Development in Australia", CLARA Discussion Paper Series, Launceston, Tasmania.

Newman and Ann Dale. (2008), Social Capital: A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for
Suistainable Community Development? Oxford University Press and Community
Development, Greet Clarendon Street, Oxford,

Matthias, A. Z. (2008), "Bringing Society Back in: Civil Society, Social Capital and Third Sector",
in William A Maloney and Jan W. van Deth (eds.), Civil Society and Governance in Europe,
Edwar Elgar, Cheltenham.

OECD. (2001), Social Capital. The Well Being of Nation; The Role of Human and Social Capital,
Rosewood Drive, Denver.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
76
Putnam, R. (2001), "Social Capital: Measurment and Concequences", Isuma, Canadian Journal of
Policy Research.

Schaefer-McDaniel, N. J. (2004), "Conceptualizing Social Capital among Young People:Towards a


New Theory", Retrieved
from.http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye/14_1/articles/article6full.html .

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 67 - 77
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
77
Resilience of Firms to Economic and Climate Shocks

Initial Insights from Philippine SMEs


Jamil Paolo Francisco
AIM RSN Policy Center for Competitiveness
The Asian Institute of Management
Makati, 1260 Metro Manila, Philippines
Email: JFrancisco@aim.edu
Ailyn Lau
AIM RSN Policy Center for Competitiveness
The Asian Institute of Management
Makati, 1260 Metro Manila, Philippines
Email: alau@aim.edu
Ronald U. Mendoza
AIM RSN Policy Center for Competitiveness
The Asian Institute of Management
Makati, 1260 Metro Manila, Philippines
Email: ronmendoza@post.harvard.edu
Abstract
Households and businesses need to cope and thrive in an increasingly shock-prone world.
Development and poverty reduction strategies need to take careful account of efforts to
promote not just more resilient households and communities; but also more resilient firms on
which many jobs and livelihoods depend on. Public sector and donor support for disaster- and
crisis-hit communities is critical; but it is only when firms get back up that the community is
able to recover fully. Once firms are able to start operating again, then workers are able to
return to their jobs and the domestic economy is able to return to normal. Stronger resilience
over time is also expected to reflect more robust economic competitiveness and yield more
robust investments. The goal of this study is to assess the resilience of the Philippines’ small and
medium scale enterprises (SMEs) during economic and environmental shocks. The main focus
here is on firms’ resilience during the global financial crisis and economic slowdown in 2008-
2010 and the major floods that hit the country in 2009 and 2011. These climate-related shocks
affected cities such as Marikina, Iligan, and Cagayan de Oro. SMEs in these cities will be the main
focus of this study.

Key words: aggregate shocks; crisis resilience; SMEs; consumption and investment smoothing
JEL codes: D20, H41, O12, O43, P48

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
78
Introduction

The world is increasingly becoming shock prone and families and businesses

need to cope and thrive despite the rising number of crises and aggregate economic and

climactic disturbances. The Asian region is among the most vulnerable to natural

hazards in the world—home to about 1 death per 1,000 square kilometers from natural

hazards (double the global average of 0.5 deaths per 1,000 square kilometers) and

accounting for about 50% of the world’s estimated economic cost of disasters over the

past 20 years. The estimated average loss incurred by the ASEAN from disasters is more

than $19 billion every 100 years, and yet less than 5% of disaster losses in developing

Asia are insured as compared to the 40% in developing countries (ADB, 2013).

In the Philippines, a single typhoon, Ondoy, caused an estimated damage of US $

254 million (The Philippine Star, 2011). On the other hand, the 2011 flood in Thailand

resulted in an estimated cumulative damage of US $ 45 billion (AON Benfield, 2012).

Unless measures to reduce disaster risk and improve preparedness are put in place, the

increasing frequency of disasters has the ability to disrupt the region's economic growth

and poverty reduction efforts.

Albeit temporary, these crises still tend to have persistent consequences,

depending on the resilience of the individuals, households, firms and other entities in a

community or country. This helps to establish the main rationale for public action in

this area – to preserve and promote economic and social returns through substantial

reduction of risk and vulnerability (Fuentes-Nieva and Seck, 2010). It is a known fact

that the poor are the most vulnerable to various types of crises, as they have less

capability to cope with risks (Lokshin and Yemtsov, 2004), so that policies to reduce

risk should be at the core of poverty reduction efforts (e.g. Harper et al, 2012; Fuentes-

Nieva and Seck, 2010; Mendoza, 2009a; Skoufias, 2003).


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
79
Thus promoting more resilient firms and production chains could also be part of

strategies to strengthen the resilience of communities. The implicit rationale here is

simple. Public sector and donor support support for disaster- and crisis-hit

communities is critical; but it is only when firms get back up that the community is able

to recover fully. Once firms are able to start operating again, then workers are able to

return to their jobs and the domestic economy is able to return to normal. Stronger

resilience over time is also expected to reflect more robust economic competitiveness

and yield more robust investments.

The goal of this study is to assess the resilience of the Philippines’ small and

medium scale enterprises (SMEs) during economic and environmental shocks. The main

focus here is on firms’ resilience during the global financial crisis and economic

slowdown in 2008-2010 and the major floods that hit the country in 2009 and 2011.

These climate-related shocks affected cities such as Marikina, Iligan, and Cagayan de

Oro. SMEs in these cities will be the main focus of this study.

A second objective is to empirically examine crisis coping behavior of SMEs and

its possible implication on economic competitiveness and the resilience of households.

The key questions to be answered by this study are the following:

1. How are firms affected by economic or environmental shocks?

2. What mechanisms were adopted by firms to cope with the crisis or disaster?

(What were the effects after these mechanisms were adopted?)

3. What policies could help to lower firms’ risks over time and boost resilience

in the immediate aftermath of shocks?

4. What characteristics of firms and the jurisdictions they operate in, and which

coping strategies, seem to be associated with stronger crisis resilience?

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
80
In what follows, section 1 provides a review of related literature, while section 2

develops the analytical framework for this study. Section 3 then describes the empirical

methodology and data. Section 4 contains the main analysis of findings, and a final

section revisits initial findings for policymakers.

Review of Literature

Most of the literature on crisis resilience examined household-level data in order

to better understand how families and individuals cope with aggregate shocks. Very few

studies have focused on firm-level data, and the ways in which firms and entrepreneurs

adjust to these same shocks.

Household Resilience

Studies of household coping behavior provided evidence that the types of coping

pursued by households tend to vary with their characteristics—and often types

households that are poorer tend to cope in harsher ways. Lokshin and Yemtsov (2004),

for instance, explored the coping strategies that respondents adopted during the

Russian financial crisis of August 1998. Their study found evidence that the level of

human capital was a major factor behind the choice of survival strategies. That study

established clusters of different coping activities:

 (C1) Active strategies or relying on household resources (e.g. increase home

production, change in place of residence, finding supplementary work, renting

out an apartment);

 (C2) Relying on social networks (e.g. turning to friends and relatives or

government for assistance), and;

 (C3) Passive or cuts in household expenditures (e.g. cutting on spending or

taking fewer holidays).


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
81
The study identified the passive cluster (C3) as akin to marginalization during a

crisis; and it focused on identifying the households that only chose activities in this

cluster. The most widely used coping mechanisms were also the least effective (i.e. the

questionnaire also asked the respondent to rate the helpfulness of each mechanism). A

cross tabulation of expenditure deciles vs. coping strategies showed that the poor are

doubly constrained—they face a limited set of coping alternatives and these alternatives

also tend to be least effective and likely to impact their human capabilities in the longer

run (e.g. cutting on human capital spending).

The study also estimated three regression equations with three different

dependent variables by using maximum likelihood method. This system of equations

was estimated by the following explanatory variables: household-specific factors (e.g.

household size, age of head, level of education of head, etc.), locality factors (e.g. local

unemployment rate and level of inequality), and previous working history of the

household head. The two main findings of the study were that: a) welfare or

consumption before the crisis had positive correlation with C1 and negative correlation

with C2 implying that poorer households rely more on soliciting help, and b) those who

turned to C3 types of coping strategies were mostly pensioners in urban households.

The results also showed that the households with the following characteristics

were more at risk: household head was a pensioner, smaller household, household head

with high school diploma only, and higher level of unemployment in the locality. There

was also a negative effect of land ownership on the probability of relying on passive

response. In short, they were predominantly urban pensioners and poorly educated

pre-retirement individuals.

Similarly, del Ninno et al (2001) examined the impacts of the 1998 floods that

occurred in Bangladesh which caused severe damage to rice crops and threatened the
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
82
food security of tens of millions of households. That study analyzed the adjustments of

households to the shock which typically included: reducing expenditures, selling assets,

and borrowing. A majority of the households (60% of the sample) coped by borrowing,

resulting in a rise in average household debt of 1.5 months of typical consumption

(compared with a small percentage of monthly consumption about eight months before

floods). The borrowing was able to keep the value of household expenditures at the pre-

flood levels. But higher prices forced flood-affected poor households to consume fewer

calories per capita, per day when compared to non-flood-exposed households. This

finding implied that targeted cash transfers and credit programs could have been an

effective complement to direct food distribution (del Ninno et al, 2001). Thus,

information on poor and vulnerable households could help sharpen crisis response

policies.

In addition, Datt and Hoogeveen (1999) used household survey data for 1998 to

analyze the effect of the financial crisis in the Philippines and found that in terms of the

impact on poverty, the relatively greater shock was caused by the El Niño weather

phenomenon. The labor market shock was progressive (reducing inequality). However,

the El Niño shock turned out to be more regressive (increasing inequality). Certain

community and household characteristics mitigated the impact of the shocks. For

example, landowners were much more affected by El Niño shocks. Nevertheless,

households with higher levels of education were affected more by wage and

employment shocks. Predictably, more commercially developed communities were

much more affected by the financial crisis. Yet, occupational diversity within a

household helped mitigate the adverse impact, suggesting that household resilience

could be strengthened through better diversification of income sources. While some

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
83
better-off households were able to smooth consumption, the poor were less able to

protect their consumption (Datt and Hoogeveen, 1999).

Fuentes-Nieva and Seck (2010) also found that in the absence of credit or

insurance markets, short-term survival was often chosen over a longer-term

perspective of welfare in most crisis situations (e.g. lessening of food intake of children

or dropping out of school which affects their future chances). Uninsured risk changes

investment behavior where for example, asset-poor households devoted a larger share

of land to safer traditional varieties of rice and castor than to riskier but higher-return

varieties. Such events occurred in a very short time period but permanently diminished

the set of choices that people have. One-time shocks not only created immediate

consequences, but might also result in lifetime consequences or by changing the life-

paths of their victims. The two authors also distinguished between risk management

strategies (before the shock occurs) and risk-coping strategies (once the shock occurs).

Skoufias (2003) also summarized studies by the International Food Policy

Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB),

concluding that poorer households have less ability to deal with shocks and may choose

coping strategies that keep them poor (e.g. selling productive assets like draft animals,

decreasing human capital of their children) or transmitting poverty from the current

generation to the next. Hence, through these two channels, a short-lived shock might

have adverse effects in the long run.

What did we take away from all these studies? Governments should provide

safety nets during shocks, but these programs must also contribute to poverty

alleviation in the long run. With regards to public actions to minimize exposure to and

impact of shocks, there were several instruments to be used (e.g. cash transfer and

public work programs, unemployment assistance, wage and commodity price subsidies,
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
84
targeted human development or cash transfer programs conditioned on school

attendance and regular visits to health centers, service fee waiver, food and nutrition

programs, micro-finance and social fund programs, etc.), but predictably each

demonstrated its own advantages and disadvantages. It appeared that ex-ante risk

reduction programs put in place before a crisis occurs tended to be more effective and

give more value for money as compared to ex-post mitigation and coping programs as

they seemed to enhance welfare as well as reduce poverty at the same time (Skoufias,

2003).

Resilience of Enterprises

Few studies covered the vulnerability of firms to aggregate economic shocks,

including the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 and the global financial crisis that

erupted in 2008.

The Asian crisis was rooted in the involvement of major conglomerates in

banking and investment, and therefore relatively large firms are affected more severely

(as smaller firms rely on self-finance and do not rely as much on formal financial

institutions) (Berry et al, 2001). In Indonesia, where the crisis peaked in 1998, causing

its GDP to contract by 13%, the most common coping strategies of firms included

decreasing the number of workers and using cheaper inputs instead of imported

materials (Berry et al, 2001).

In the Republic of Korea where policies were skewed towards large firms, the

government played a major role in helping SMEs survive the crisis by restructuring the

financial sector with a focus on providing financing for SMEs that are knowledge and

technology intensive companies. This policy helped to increase loans to SMEs, boosting

the investment of SMEs notably in R&D to reinforce their technological competitiveness.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
85
The assistance of government policies helped SMEs fight their vulnerability and even

compete internationally. Arguably, such a strategy contributed to the inclusiveness of

the recovery process in Korea, perhaps even contributing to its v-shaped economic

recovery from the Asian crisis (Gregory et al, 2002).

Some studies called for size-neutral policies rather than size-specific ones. In

Indonesia, the effect of the Asian Financial Crisis is known to be an industry and location

specific crisis as shown by the data that the manufacturing and other urban-centered

sectors registered a double digit negative growth in 1998 (Sato, 2000). The

metalworking and machinery industries were hit the hardest, recording a decline of

52%. However, looking at the data closely showed that small firms in the manufacturing

sector recorded a positive value added despite the crisis (Sato, 2000).

Sato (2000) hypothesized that the performance of SMEs varied even in the same

industry and location. Using data from 50 enterprises in Java from 1997-1999, his study

showed that 65% of the firms in sector were affected negatively, but performance

varied. Some enjoyed a turnover that was higher than their pre-crisis level. No

correlation was found between size and performance during crisis, thus generalizations

for SMEs did not appear cogent (Sato, 2000).

Using firm-level data in Indonesia, Narjoko and Hill (2007) also found that firm

location, foreign ownership and prior export orientation were significant determinants

of firm survival and recovery during the crisis of 1997-1998. Similar to Sato, that study

found that firm size was found to be an ambiguous factor for firm survival and recovery.

Further, Wengel and Rodriguez (2006) used the Annual Manufacturing Survey

of 1996 and 2000 of 20,000 Indonesian industrial enterprises and discovered that the

Asian financial crisis caused 6,100 firms to shut down, but 5,277 new firms started

during the same period—possible proof that the response of SMEs varied. While most
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
86
closed down, a number still took advantage of new opportunities. Post-crisis firms also

seemed to be more export-oriented than pre-crisis ones (Wengel and Rodriguez, 2006).

While there could be a number of factors behind this, it is likely also connected to the

much more competitive currencies in the aftermath of the Asian crisis.

As regards the global financial crisis that erupted in 2008, Balisacan et al (2010)

traced its impact on Philippine national output using regression and decomposition

techniques and constructed an augmented panel data from national household surveys

to simulate the differential effects of the crisis across population and social groups. The

study found evidence that the global financial crisis pushed down the GDP growth rate

from its long-term trend by 1.0 percentage points in 2008 and 3.8 percentage points in

2009. The industry sector was hit the hardest. The study also talked about several

government programs such as the Economic Resiliency Plan (ERP), which aimed to

stimulate the economy through tax cuts, increased government spending, and public-

private sector projects that could cushion the impact of future upturns in the global

economy. Their study emphasized the importance of building productive assets that

would form the foundation for a faster but more inclusive recovery and growth.

Furthermore, Tambunan (2009) drew from survey data of Japanese export-

oriented firms and found evidence that the major adjustment measures adopted by

firms included: (1) seeking out new customers or markets since the slowdown was a

demand crisis; and (2) labor-related adjustments such as reducing working time,

developing alternative work arrangement and laying-off workers. The study also

conveyed that females are included in the most retrenched workers. In Japan, the global

economic slowdown rapidly deteriorated the business climate mainly through a plunge

in exports. The government responded through an allotment of ¥30 trillion in SME

financing-related measures for those more vulnerable to decrease in sales particularly


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
87
subcontractors (JSBRI, 2009). Apparently, not only export-oriented manufacturers have

been hurt. In countries heavy on tourism, the economic slowdown was expected to hurt

travel and tourism enterprises (ADB, 2009). This underscored the importance of

understanding crisis transmission mechanisms so that firms connected most to the

sources of the crisis shock could be expected to be affected the most.

In Cambodia, the global financial crisis affected key industries, such as garments,

tourism, construction and agriculture, which drove the growth of the Cambodian

economy. A survey of 120 SMEs in the construction and tourism sector in the provinces

of Phnom Penh and Siam Reap conducted in 2011 showed that the most common coping

mechanisms used by SMEs during the crisis included reducing staff (28.3%), saving

costs (13.3%), and reducing utilities expense (11.7%) (Ngin, 2012).

In addition, a multi-country study covering some Asian economies analyzed the

WBES data and found that the global crisis resulted in more severe employment

reduction among skill-intensive firms, larger contraction in sales in younger firms, and

decline in sales among innovative firms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (Correa and

Iooty, 2010). More than a third of firms in some countries in Eastern and Central Europe

considered reducing their workforce within six months (Ramalho et al., 2009). In the

same region, another study showed that in four out of six countries surveyed, the

percentage of firms with overdue financial obligations rose from 2009 to 2010 (Correa

et al., 2010).

Guimbert and Oostendorp (2012) focused on the risk coping behavior that

required smoothing of inputs (labor, raw materials, or capital). The data used comes

from a panel of Cambodian firms from 2008 to 2009. Using a theoretical framework that

analyzed the responsiveness of inputs to demand shocks, the study found that although

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
88
the degree to which firms adjusted inputs differ, firms without credit constraints were

more able to smooth their use of inputs when shocks are perceived as temporary.

The ability to smooth or hoard inputs was based on liquidity constraints, thus

credit-constrained firms dealt with incomplete smoothing or sub-optimal smoothing or

imperfect smoothing, i.e. reducing inputs (reduce hiring, increase firing, reduce

inventory of raw materials and reduce production capacity) significantly even if they

expected the downward shock to be temporary, and leading to a welfare loss due to

incomplete risk coping. The study found that credit constrained firms were less able to

maintain their productive capacity, thus incurring higher adjustment costs in the future.

(The study estimated the loss at 44.4 times the adjustment costs of the firms without

credit constraints.)

Adjustment of inputs was based on the presence of credit constraints and

expectations on duration of the negative shock, but the size of the adjustment depends

on adjustment costs, the price of inputs, the size of the demand shock, the persistence of

the shock, and the availability of finance. The desire to smooth when there is a negative

shock was due to adjustments costs. For example, the study found that the reduction of

unskilled and non-production workers were greater because adjustment cost was

higher for firing or hiring skilled workers. The study concluded with three policy

implications:

 Contagion Effect: The higher response of the labor market to the demand shock (by

sub-optimal smoothing) reflected a constraint on the capital market. The relevant

policy to adjust was therefore financial policy. By reducing credit during crises,

capital markets may tend to exacerbate shocks.

 Role of policies to absorb sub-optimal smoothing: This emphasized the role of social

safety nets. Emerging sectors will not be able to provide full smoothing for
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
89
temporary shocks; and therefore public policy could play a key role notably in

preventing harm to human development and human capital.

 Macroeconomic policy: If all firms perceived the shock as permanent, there could be

a negative demand feedback loop or their combined reaction of smoothing inputs

will make the shock more permanent. Thus, to the extent possible, there was a role

for the public sector to help assure that the shock is quickly mitigated, and also send

a credible signal that the shock was temporary in nature.

Environmental Crises

Even fewer studies examined how firms cope with natural disasters. Those that

focused on the recent disaster events do not specifically use firm-level data. For

instance, Lempert et al (2013) saw that the recent flood risk reduction efforts of Ho Chi

Minh City may be insufficient as climate and socio-economic conditions deviate from

projections made during the initial planning of those efforts. To help the city develop a

better risk management strategy in the face of an unpredictable future, the study used

robust decision making (RMD) to analyze flood risk management in Ho Chi Minh City’s

Nhieu Loc-Thi Nghe canal catchment area. RMD is “an iterative, quantitative, decision

support methodology designed to help policy makers identify strategies that are robust,

that is, satisfying decision makers’ objectives in many plausible futures, rather than

being optimal in any single estimate of the future” by running models thousands of

times to estimate the performance of proposed plans over different combinations of

uncertainties. The results showed that the soon-to-be-completed infrastructure may

reduce risk in best estimates of future conditions, but was not as effective in many other

plausible futures (Lempert et al, 2013).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
90
There were also studies of country-specific crises. Ando and Kimura (2012), for

example, studied the similarities and differences of the responses of Japanese

machinery exporters to two major crises: the global financial crisis, described as a

demand shock and the East Japan earthquake, a supply shock. The reaction to the global

financial crisis, whose negative effects were larger and more prolonged, were

permanent, such as the shrinkage of the basis of the Japanese exports and the

realization of the increasing importance of trade with other East Asian countries. The

East Japan earthquake also influenced structural reforms but corporate activities

quickly returned to the original production in a shorter span of time (Ando and Kimura,

2012).

Moving forward, further studies on the vulnerability of firms in times of crisis or

on the coping strategies of Asian firms during crisis is much needed. The likely lasting

consequences of these coping strategies to crisis can be further examined, as well as

possible implications as far as public policy and business strategy (e.g. retrenchment of

skilled workers during the crisis, and implication for innovation and R&D during the

recovery). Job creation during the recovery and the link between democracy and

business reforms can also form part of the thematic focus of these proposals.

Analytical Framework

While there were many approaches to define and operationalize the concept of

resilience, Frankenberger et al (2012) provided a useful starting point, which states that

resilience is “the ability of countries, communities, and households to anticipate, adapt

to, and/or recover from the effects of potentially hazardous occurrences (natural

disasters, economic instability, conflict) in a manner that protects livelihoods,

accelerates and sustains recovery, and supports economic and social development”.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
91
Different resilience assessment frameworks developed first with the “system of

interest” or “unit of analysis”—identifying who or what is adapting (Smit and Pilifosova,

2001; Frankenberger et al, 2012). The units of analysis in this paper were micro, small

and medium scale enterprises. Hence, following the approach in the literature, the

resilience of the unit of analysis depended on context (environmental, political, social,

economic, historical, demographic, religious, conflict and policy conditions, etc.), the

disturbance itself (form, magnitude, frequency, and duration of shocks), and adaptive

capacity (nature and extent of access to and use of resources in order to deal with

disturbance in the form of livelihood assets, structures and processes, and livelihood

strategies) (Frankenberger et al, 2012).

The relations of firms with other stakeholders (customers, suppliers,

competitors, partners, investors, etc.), capital, labor, product markets in which firms

operate, and the quantity and quality of support from the government and other

institutions, also affected the way firms cope with the crisis and their performance

(Kitching et al, 2009).

Smit and Pilifosova further expounded on adaptive capacity, which they explain

was affected by:

 Economic resources – wealth and poverty were rough indicators of the ability

to cope;

 Technology – the unit’s level of technology and ability to develop new ones

affected the range of possible responses to risk;

 Information and skills – Among other examples, this included “lack of trained

and skilled personnel, lack of systems for dissemination of information, lack

of forums for discussion can limit adaption options”;

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
92
 Infrastructure – This mitigated the flexibility to deal with risks (e.g.

alternative source of energy or drainage system to accommodate flood);

 Institutions - Inadequate institutional support was frequently cited in the

literature as a hindrance to adaptation; in developed countries, they

facilitated management of risks and provide capacity to deal with future

risks;

 Equity - Some researchers regarded the adaptive capacity of a system as a

function of availability of and access to resources by decision-makers and

vulnerable subsectors of a population; differentiation in demographic

variables (age, gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, health, etc) were

related to the ability to cope with risks as they may prevent access to finance

or infrastructure.

Most resilience frameworks used households as their unit of analysis. There

were studies that focused on competitiveness of firms that can also be used in a crisis

context. Kumar and Chadee (2002), for example, combined elements from different

theoretical perspectives to develop a conceptual model for the competitiveness for

firms in Asian developing countries, which are on average small, technologically

underdeveloped with unskilled workers, and operate within an underdeveloped

financial sector. Their model identified three factors internal to the firm that can

enhance competitiveness: (i) flexibility and cooperation with outside organizations, (ii)

innovation, and (iii) human resource orientation.

Arguing that external factors that firms face were also important, the model also

included the role of government in supporting business and industrial development.

The authors cited the lack of access to finance after the Asian financial crisis as an

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
93
example to support the fact that access to capital and other financial resources, which

the government can control, was necessary for firm growth and survival.

How units cope with the shock was often measured by sensitivity (i.e. the degree

to which the unit will be affected by a given shock or stress), resilience, and livelihood

outcome (i.e. needs and objectives the unit is trying to realize) (Frankenberger et al,

2012). Most frameworks viewed resilience as a process rather than a static state (Smit

and Pilifosova, 2001; Frankenberger, 2012).

Combining the different studies on assessing the resilience of households and

firms, this paper used the framework below:

Figure 1. Theoretical Framework on Crisis Resilience

External
Conditions

Coping
Shock Productivity of SMEs Strategies

Firm
Characteristics

Source: Authors’ own elaboration, drawing on the review of literature.

Put simply, when an aggregate shock takes place, firms were already in a certain

context and possessed a set of specific characteristics that will moderate its effects. Both

external conditions and firm characteristics affected firm productivity and the coping

strategies that they will choose. Productivity was also affected by the shock, but it could

also act as a mitigating factor for the shock itself. An over-all assessment of these

various factors could therefore provide a sense of how resilient the firms were; and to

what extent this resilience was moderated by various factors that matter to its

competitiveness.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
94
Data and Methodology

As a contribution to the scant literature in this area, this study examined data on

firms’ crisis coping strategies, drawn from the 2012 AIM-ADB Enterprise Survey

conducted from July 16 to December 8, 2012.

Table 2. Cities Included in the Survey


Luzon (17 cities) Region
Baguio CAR
Dagupan I
San Fernando, La Union I
Santiago II
Tuguegarao II
Angeles III
Olongapo III
Lucena IV
Batangas IV
Puerto Princesa IV
Naga V
Legazpi V
Marikina NCR
Pasay NCR
Quezon City NCR
Taguig NCR
Valenzuela NCR
Visayas (7 cities) Region
Iloilo VI
Bacolod VI
Cebu VII
Mandaue VII
Lapu-Lapu VII
Tacloban VIII
Ormoc VIII
Mindanao (10 cities) Region
Zamboanga IX
Pagadian IX
Cagayan de Oro X
Iligan X
Davao XI
Tagum XI
General Santos XII
Cotabato XII
Butuan CARAGA
Surigao CARAGA
Source: AIM Policy Center.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
95
The survey covered 2,040 MSMEs in 34 cities in the Philippines. A total of 60

business enterprises were surveyed in each city. The cities included in the survey are

listed in Table 1.

We used stratified random sampling using firm size. We also adopted the

definition of firm size used in the Philippine Magna Carta on MSMEs. Hence, the

grouping was based on asset values:

 Micro: Php3M and below

 Small: more than Php3M to Php15M

 Medium: more than Php15M to Php100M

The strata distribution was comprised of 30 Micro, 15 Small and 15 Medium per

city. A floor on asset value and employment, Php1M and 5 employees respectively, was

also introduced to filter the sample. The survey contains several modules:

 Baseline module (contains the characteristics of the entrepreneur that

can serve as possible correlates for analyzing other issues)

 Public goods provision and economic governance

 Innovation

 Finance

 Crisis resilience

Using statistical and econometric analysis, the study focused on the crisis

resilience module and used the baseline module when needed.

Descriptive Analysis

Three observations were dropped out of the 2,040 firms because the asset values

of the firms were beyond the Php 100M, which placed them in the large size category.

There were 838 out of 2,037 firms that experienced at least one form of economic or

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
96
environmental shock as outlined in the questionnaire. This number was based on the

firms that responded that the global financial crisis had moderate to very high effect on

their businesses, or that that they experienced any form of disaster or calamity. The

dataset included various industries affected by economic or environmental shocks

(Table 2).

Table 3. Industries Affected by Economic or Environmental Shocks


Current Primary Economic Activity
(PSIC) Firms affected by any shock Firms not affected Total number of firms
Agriculture, Hunting & Forestry 7 4 11
Manufacturing 66 117 183
Electricity, Gas, and Water 6 19 25
Construction 4 7 11
Wholesale, Retail, Trade 455 637 1,092
Hotel and Restaurants 136 137 273
Transportation, Storage,
Communication 14 28 42
Finance 5 11 16
Real Estate, Renting & Business 51 73 124
Education 14 24 38
Human Health & Social Work 16 24 40
Other Social & Personal Activities 64 118 182
Total 838 1,199 2,037
Source: AIM Policy Center.
To go into specific details, the two kinds of shocks were scrutinized separately.

More than half of the respondents (68.34%) reported that the global financial crisis had

“no impact” to “minimal impact” on their business. Of the firms that reported “moderate

impact” to “very high impact”, the majority was on the micro and small scale in terms of

firm size (see Table 3). The proportion of firms per size affected by the GFC is as follows:

30.92% of micro, 30.21% of small and 36.7% of medium. This suggested that the sample

contained firms affected in some way by aggregate shocks despite their relative size

differences.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
97
Table 4. Effect of the Global Financial Crisis
Total of Very Total of
Firm No Negligible Minimal No to Moderate High High Moderate to
Size Impact Impact Impact Minimal Impact Impact Impact Very High Total Firms
Micro 602 46 145 793 132 191 32 355 1,148
Small 272 23 70 365 54 94 10 158 523
Medium 181 14 39 234 69 55 8 132 366
Total 1,055 83 254 1392 255 340 50 645 2,037
Source: AIM Policy Center.

The study also examined environmental shocks, measured by the number of

respondents who answered that they were hit by any disaster or calamity. The

calamities listed in the questionnaire include typhoon, flood, drought, earthquake,

volcanic eruption, armed conflict, fire, and others. However, of the 348 respondents

affected by any form of disaster or calamity, 297 (85.34%) said they were affected by

typhoons, 288 (82.76%) were affected by floods, and only 24 (6.9%) answered that they

were affected by other types of disasters listed.

The five cities that were most affected by calamities are Dagupan City, Iligan City,

Marikina City, Olongapo City and Pasay City. In terms of firm size, 55.46% of those affect

by calamities are micro, 25.29% are small, and 19.25% were medium (see Figure 2).

However, since 30 micro firms were interviewed per city, as compared to the 15 small

and 15 medium firms per city, it was more practical to combine the numbers of the

small and medium firms or to examine the proportion per firm size. Only 154 out of the

348 firms (44.25%) that were affected by climate shocks had disaster preparedness kits

in their workplace, suggesting a high degree of unpreparedness.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
98
Figure 2. Firms Affected by Calamities by City and Size

60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Tuguegarao City
Olongapo City
Bacolod City

Iligan City

San Fernando City


Batangas City
Butuan City

Naga City
Cebu City

Davao City

Pagadian City
Pasay City
General Santos City

Puerto Princesa City

Valenzuela City
Dagupan City

Surigao City
Iloilo City

Quezon City

Tagum City
Angeles City

Baguio City

Lucena City
Cotabato City

Legazpi City
Cagayan De Oro City

Lapu Lapu City

Santiago City

Zamboanga City
Marikina City
Micro Small Medium

Source: AIM Policy Center Enterprise Survey 2013.

As regards coping mechanisms (Figure 3), the most common were reducing R&D

spending (29.11%), asking suppliers for credits on transaction (25.45%), diversifying or

introducing new products or services (17.59%), stopping operations for a period

(17.23%) and laying off employees (14.11%). Clearly, these coping mechanisms varied

in their implications for over-all firm and community resilience (i.e. those that cut

investments in future competitiveness could suffer more lasting consequences form the

shock; and those that laid off workers could also contribute to the weaker resilience of

communities since many would be unemployed). Other coping mechanisms with similar

implications were also observed (Table 4).

The other coping mechanisms provided by the respondents included operations

cost-cutting (electricity/ water/ telephone), marketing or promotions, and giving

discounts to clients. For the 158 firms who laid-off employees to cope with the global

financial crisis or calamities, as much as 22 firms (13.92%) reduced the number of their

employees by half or more. Nevertheless, after adopting the adjustments, the majority

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
99
of the firms were able to sustain daily operations (97.14%), but some still incurred

serious losses in revenues (25.27%) and lost clients (18.57%). Furthermore, only 5 out

of the 838 crisis affected firms reported receiving any formal assistance (such as from

government or organizations other than friends or relatives).

Figure 3. Coping Mechanisms of Firms Affected by the Global Financial Crisis and
Calamities (%)

Source: AIM Policy Center Enterprise Survey 2013.

Empirical Specification

The paper will use an analogous regression framework based on different

household coping literature. For example, Loshkin (2004) who studied coping strategies

of households in Russia during a financial crisis uses the assumption that household

utility is a continuous function of three factors: consumption of a composite good,

leisure of its members, and household characteristics that act as taste shifters. To

achieve maximum utility, a household has the choice to apply one or more strategy

during shocks, where each strategy has its costs and benefits for the household. If the
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
100
benefits of a certain strategy outweigh its costs, the household chooses to employ the

strategy.

As Loshkin (2004) argues, assuming that the unobserved gain G ij associated with

the choice of strategy set j by household i can be approximated by a linear combination

of the exogenous variables, the observed choice of the particular set of strategies can be

presented as:

and Corr for

= an indicator variable of the choice of the set of strategies j by household i


= vector of unknown coefficients
Xi = vector of exogenous variables
= an error term
where is an indicator variable of the choice of the set of strategies j by

household i, is a vector of unknown coefficients, Xi is a vector of exogenous variables,

is an error term, 1 indicates the state with a strategy implemented, and 0 indicates the

state where a strategy is not used.

In this paper, 20 binary probit equations are used with the 20 coping mechanisms as
the dependent variable in each equation:

The independent variables include important factors that influence firm

performance such as firm characteristics and characteristics of the city where the firm is

located. The 20 coping mechanisms are also grouped into their possible implications on

competitiveness or productivity of the firm. The summary of the variables used are

presented in Table 4 below. The objective here is to create meaningful categories of

coping so as to help reveal possible patterns that could be useful in interpreting over-all

(and sustained) resilience of firms.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
101
Table 5. Variables Used
Dependent Variables
Coping Increases competitiveness Invited an investor
mechanisms
Diversified or introduced new products / services
Sought new markets
Neutral mechanisms Acquired a loan from a financial institution
Acquired multiple loans from different financial institution
Borrowed funds from relatives / friends
Borrowed funds from usurer /loan sharks
Asked clients for advances
Asked suppliers for credits on transactions
Buying second-hand equipment instead of new
Shifted to cheaper brands
Sold some assets or amenities
Decreases competitiveness Reduced R&D spending

Postponement of tax payment


Postponement of payment for services
Postponement of wages payment
Laid-off some employees
Reduce benefits such as paid leaves and bonuses
Stopped operation for a period
Discontinued/closed some products/offices
Explanatory variables
Firm log_bus_assetval Natural log of present business asset value (Php) basis for firm
characteristics size
corporation Type of ownership: 1 if corporation; 0 if otherwise (single
proprietorship/ partnership)
bus_age_yr business age in years
log_productivity0 Natural log of (total sales in 2009/ total employees in 2009)
collgrad_empl_prop percentage of employees who finished at least a four year degree
course
resp_wexp_yr Years of related work experience of respondent

tot_amenities Total amenities (computer, printer, telephone, tv, stove, etc.)


export Geographical markets served : 1 if international; 0 if local
bus_insur Has any type of insurance for business related purposes
City infracty_goodnot City’s infrastructure rating: good vs. not good
characteristics log_tot_cityincome Natural log of total city income
populationdensity Population density per city
higher_educinst Number of higher education institution in the city
tot_bank Total number of banks in the city
dynastym Presence of dynasty in the mayor level
Source: AIM Policy Center.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
102
Analysis of Empirical Results

Using binary probit, the results are shown in Table 5 below. Table 6 is a

summary of the results, showing only variables that are significant. A plus sign (+)

signifies the direct relationship of the dependent variable (specific coping mechanism)

and the independent variable, while a minus sign (-) signifies an inverse relationship.

The coping mechanisms are also grouped where the three leftmost columns enclosed in

a blue border are coping mechanisms that increase competitiveness, the middle group is

composed of coping mechanisms that neither increase nor decrease competitiveness,

and the ten rightmost columns enclosed in a red border are coping mechanisms that

decrease competitiveness.

Table 6. Regression Results


(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Acquired loan Acquired multiple Borrowed from Borrowed Invited a
from financial loans from financial relatives and from new
Variables inst inst friends usurers investor
business asset value (log) -0.006 0.073 -0.120* -0.123* 0.103
[0.060] [0.054] [0.073] [0.071] [0.067]
corporation -0.229 0.353 -1.161*** 0 -0.592*
[0.313] [0.454] [0.389] omitted [0.347]
business age (years) -0.004 0.000 -0.004 0.024*** -0.029**
[0.006] [0.006] [0.011] [0.009] [0.013]
productivity in 2009 (log) -0.030 -0.004 0.192* -0.016 0.149**
[0.032] [0.030] [0.100] [0.050] [0.066]
prop of employees who graduated
college -0.005* -0.004 -0.010** -0.001 0.007**
[0.002] [0.003] [0.004] [0.005] [0.003]
work experience of respondent
(years) 0.001 -0.007 0.019 0.030 0.028*
[0.015] [0.018] [0.015] [0.020] [0.015]
total no. of amenities 0.004 -0.018 0.002 -0.103** -0.007
[0.004] [0.012] [0.004] [0.052] [0.007]
export -0.109 -0.393 -0.177 0.073 0.337
[0.322] [0.390] [0.398] [0.439] [0.507]
business insurance -0.313* -0.703** -0.289 -0.501 0.017
[0.187] [0.303] [0.290] [0.321] [0.264]
rating of city infrastructure: good or
not good -0.150 -0.033 -0.144 -0.043 -0.307
[0.184] [0.217] [0.255] [0.229] [0.303]
total city income (log) -0.452** -0.339 -0.447* -1.151*** -0.197
[0.217] [0.307] [0.257] [0.272] [0.234]
population density 0.000 -0.000* 0.000** 0.000 0.000
[0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
103
no. of higher education institutions 0.003 -0.019 0.066** 0.005 0.039
[0.019] [0.014] [0.027] [0.022] [0.026]
no. of banks 0.001 0.005* -0.007* 0.006* -0.005
[0.003] [0.003] [0.004] [0.003] [0.004]
dynasty (mayor level) 0.021 0.005 0.381* 0.402 0.822**
[0.170] [0.294] [0.218] [0.296] [0.321]
Constant 9.093** 4.988 6.821 23.784*** -1.151
[4.354] [6.324] [5.470] [5.816] [5.046]
Observation 859 859 859 667 859
Robust standard errors in brackets
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
(6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Postponed
Asked advance Asked credit Postponed services
Variables Reduced R&D from clients from suppliers tax payment payment
business asset value (log) 0.092 0.091 0.142*** 0.143** 0.061
[0.056] [0.056] [0.049] [0.058] [0.085]
corporation -0.568** -0.304 -0.662** -0.972** -1.174*
[0.249] [0.327] [0.327] [0.466] [0.614]
business age (years) 0.000 -0.013* 0.000 -0.016** 0.016*
[0.007] [0.007] [0.007] [0.006] [0.009]
productivity in 2009 (log) 0.001 0.057* 0.072** -0.038 -0.115***
[0.028] [0.034] [0.036] [0.028] [0.043]
prop of employees who graduated
college 0.003 0.003 -0.006*** -0.002 -0.013***
[0.002] [0.003] [0.002] [0.004] [0.005]
work experience of respondent
(years) -0.002 0.015 -0.002 0.032 0.011
[0.011] [0.013] [0.011] [0.020] [0.011]
total no. of amenities 0.004 -0.009 -0.007 -0.004 0.003
[0.003] [0.006] [0.005] [0.006] [0.006]
export 0.303 0.904*** 0.297 -1.110* 1.333***
[0.343] [0.344] [0.314] [0.593] [0.464]
business insurance 0.051 0.202 0.228 -0.203 -0.258
[0.200] [0.238] [0.212] [0.353] [0.439]
rating of city infrastructure: good or
not good -0.147 -0.077 -0.260 0.656** -0.709***
[0.184] [0.226] [0.183] [0.320] [0.265]
total city income (log) 0.295 0.063 0.428** -0.170 -0.661*
[0.196] [0.228] [0.210] [0.329] [0.348]
population density 0.000* 0.000 -0.000*** 0.000 0.000
[0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
no. of higher education institutions 0.013 0.025 -0.029 -0.026 -0.069***
[0.018] [0.024] [0.019] [0.020] [0.025]
no. of banks -0.003 -0.005 0.003 0.002 0.012***
[0.002] [0.003] [0.002] [0.004] [0.005]
dynasty (mayor level) -0.029 0.304 -0.047 0.449 1.375***
[0.163] [0.220] [0.174] [0.343] [0.433]
Constant -8.374** -4.718 -11.906*** -0.171 11.105
[4.064] [4.830] [4.446] [6.932] [7.600]
Observation 859 859 859 859 859

Robust standard errors in brackets


*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
104
(11) (12) (13) (14) (15)
Bought second Reduced
Postponed hand Laid-off benefits of Stopped
Variables wages equipment employees employees operations
business asset value (log) 0.086 0.007 0.072 -0.041 -0.178***
[0.063] [0.060] [0.071] [0.073] [0.054]
corporation -0.561 -0.160 -0.240 0.034 0.281
[0.372] [0.362] [0.290] [0.310] [0.307]
business age (years) 0.006 -0.008 0.016*** -0.020** -0.005
[0.007] [0.008] [0.006] [0.009] [0.006]
productivity in 2009 (log) -0.079** 0.001 0.013 0.107** -0.013
[0.036] [0.035] [0.031] [0.048] [0.029]
prop of employees who graduated
college -0.003 -0.006*** -0.004 -0.001 0.000
[0.004] [0.002] [0.003] [0.003] [0.002]
work experience of respondent
(years) -0.003 -0.025* 0.005 -0.025 -0.011
[0.010] [0.015] [0.013] [0.017] [0.013]
total no. of amenities 0.002 0.002 0.005* 0.001 0.007**
[0.003] [0.003] [0.003] [0.003] [0.003]
export 0.716* 0.417 -0.244 0.785** -0.450
[0.374] [0.389] [0.410] [0.394] [0.356]
business insurance -0.529* 0.324 -0.459* -0.168 0.132
[0.299] [0.241] [0.265] [0.316] [0.230]
rating of city infrastructure: good or
not good -0.484** -0.138 -0.202 0.376* -0.474**
[0.230] [0.216] [0.220] [0.218] [0.195]
total city income (log) -0.352 0.187 0.646** -0.095 -0.240
[0.246] [0.200] [0.321] [0.228] [0.205]
population density 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000***
[0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
no. of higher education institutions -0.041** -0.021 0.074*** -0.020 0.034*
[0.017] [0.021] [0.020] [0.014] [0.019]
no. of banks 0.007*** 0.002 -0.011*** 0.004* -0.004
[0.003] [0.003] [0.003] [0.002] [0.003]
dynasty (mayor level) 0.223 0.048 0.262 -0.765*** 0.251
[0.283] [0.191] [0.231] [0.276] [0.172]
Constant 5.390 -4.654 -16.630** -0.016 6.149
[5.189] [4.212] [6.724] [4.845] [4.194]
Observation 859 859 859 859 859
Robust standard errors in brackets
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
105
(16) (17) (18) (19) (20)
Discontinued Diversified
product/ Shifted to Sold assets/ products/ Sought new
Variables service cheaper brands amenities services markets
business asset value (log) 0.012 -0.095 0.105 -0.021 0.090*
[0.055] [0.079] [0.095] [0.048] [0.054]
corporation -0.521** -0.604 -0.103 -0.282 -0.489*
[0.241] [0.369] [0.410] [0.244] [0.270]
business age (years) 0.005 -0.014 -0.003 0.000 0.006
[0.006] [0.009] [0.011] [0.007] [0.008]
productivity in 2009 (log) -0.032 0.111 -0.056 0.005 0.068*
[0.034] [0.072] [0.038] [0.032] [0.038]
prop of employees who graduated
college 0.003 -0.006* -0.001 0.002 -0.005*
[0.003] [0.003] [0.004] [0.003] [0.003]
work experience of respondent
(years) -0.004 0.029** 0.048*** 0.026* 0.023**
[0.011] [0.014] [0.014] [0.015] [0.010]
total no. of amenities 0.001 0.009*** -0.056** -0.009* -0.017***
[0.003] [0.003] [0.023] [0.005] [0.006]
export -0.088 -0.631 -1.591*** 0.655* 0.570
[0.383] [0.433] [0.500] [0.355] [0.375]
business insurance 0.147 -0.157 0.258 0.222 0.580**
[0.246] [0.235] [0.342] [0.181] [0.264]
rating of city infrastructure: good or
not good -0.389** -0.108 0.436* -0.206 -0.027
[0.174] [0.217] [0.255] [0.165] [0.236]
total city income (log) -0.649*** 0.029 0.056 0.340 0.378
[0.232] [0.222] [0.326] [0.231] [0.252]
population density 0.000** 0.000*** 0.000 0.000** 0.000
[0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
no. of higher education institutions -0.012 0.051** 0.035 -0.038** -0.011
[0.018] [0.023] [0.028] [0.016] [0.025]
no. of banks 0.002 -0.010*** -0.004 0.003 0.000
[0.002] [0.004] [0.004] [0.002] [0.003]
dynasty (mayor level) -0.281 -0.305 0.090 -0.536** -0.553**
[0.194] [0.188] [0.242] [0.208] [0.237]
Constant 12.577*** -2.107 -3.840 -7.573 -10.879**
[4.603] [4.590] [6.889] [4.684] [5.206]
Observation 859 859 859 859 857
Robust standard errors in brackets
*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
106
Table 7. Summary of Results

cheaper brands
Borrowed from

Borrowed from

Bought second
financial inst…

Postponed tax
Advance from

Reduced R&D
Invited a new

Discontinued
Sold assets…
Sought new

Credit from
Diversified

equipment

operations
employees

employees
Postponed

Postponed
products…

benefits of
relatives…
Loan from

product…
Shifted to
suppliers

payment

payment

Reduced
Multiple
investor

Laid- off
markets

Stopped
services
usurers
loans…

clients

wages
hand
Variables
business asset value (log) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (-)
corporation (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-)
business age (years) (-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (-)
productivity in 2009 (log) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) (-) (+)
prop of employees – college
graduate (+) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-)
work experience of
respondent (years) (+) (+) (+) (-) (+) (+)
total no. of amenities (-) (-) (-) (+) (-) (+) (+)
export (+) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+)
business insurance (+) (-) (-) (-) (-)
rating of city infra: good or
not good (+) (+) (-) (-) (+) (-) (-)
total city income (log) (-) (-) (-) (+) (-) (+) (-)
population density (+) (-) (+) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+)
no. of higher educ institutions (-) (+) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+)
no. of banks (+) (-) (+) (+) (+) (-) (+)
dynasty (mayor level) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (-)

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
107
With 20 different coping mechanisms, the results vary greatly. Some of the

notable patterns suggest that firm characteristics considered to be “good” result in

higher probability of choosing coping mechanisms that increase competitiveness and

lower probability of choosing coping mechanisms that decrease competitiveness. One

example is the business asset value variable, which shows that the bigger the firm size,

the more likely the firm will choose to seek new markets as an adjustment response;

and the less likely it will choose to stop operations. Another example is the productivity

variable, where the results show that the higher the productivity of a firm in 2009 (i.e.

pre-crisis), the higher the probability it will choose to invite a new investor and seek

new markets, and the lower the probability that it will postpone payments to services

and wages of employees. A third example is the variable related to the number of years

of work experience related to the business of the respondent (the survey only

interviews employees who are decision makers in the firm), where the results show

that the more experienced the respondent is, the higher the probability that the firm

will choose to use all three coping mechanisms that could be seen as contributing to

competitiveness.

These findings suggest that the coping of firms could be bifurcated – larger and

more productive firms are better able to cope, and might even see crises as

opportunities for expansion and finding new markets. However, firms that are smaller

and less productive may face additional challenges to survive, and they may turn to

crisis coping mechanisms that have negative implications on their long run

competitiveness. Nevertheless, these are very initial findings, given there is much noise

in the dataset, and the patterns of coping are still far from definitive.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
108
Directions for Policy and Research

In lieu of more definitive findings, we can only discuss directions for further

inquiry and policy action here. Much of firms’ crisis coping and adjustment is still little

understood, notably as these interact with policy variables and available risk

management tools. It is likely that policies could be vastly improved with more evidence

on how to strengthen firm level competitiveness and resilience over time. Nevertheless,

based on international experiences, the available literature, and our own initial findings,

here is a first set of points to consider for policymakers:

1. Resilience is key to competitiveness in the new policy environment. Resilience can

be measured by the typologies of the crisis coping mechanisms. The analysis can be

similar to resilience of households, where the choice of which strategy to adopt may

depend on how they see the future (e.g. If they believe that the effect of the shock is

short term, they may choose coping strategies such as delaying some forms of

spending which could have very minimal and only temporary effects; as compared

to strategies that may have more long-lived effects like selling their livestock or

permanently pulling children out of school and sending them to work).

2. Without broad based resilience, shocks can exacerbate inequality. If shocks hit

countries with greater frequency and severity, as predicted by scientists, then

smaller and more informal firms will tend to be affected more adversely, based on

this study and also on the existing international experiences. Once this becomes

broadly known and is the norm, then informal and smaller firms may also opt for

strategies that no longer enhance their productivity (such as by delaying or stopping

investments that enhance productivity but are vulnerable to shocks). Markets may

also marginalize them further, when these smaller firms are forced to choose more

flood prone areas because they are cheaper.


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
109
3. Stronger urban planning is necessary and it should not discriminate across firms.

For instance, in the city of Hanoi, planners located leisure areas like parks in more

flood prone areas. The logic is that these areas will have very little impact on the

economy if affected adversely by flooding. In the Philippines, the opposite is

typically true, manufacturing firms and key residential and business districts are

often near the river. Rivers are also sometimes over-run by informal settlers.

4. Financing mechanisms to invest in resilience and innovative risk management

mechanisms could be useful. An example is the People’s Survival Fund or Republic

Act 10174 is a law that amended the Climate Change Act of 2009 by establishing the

country’s first legislated climate change funding mechanism. The fund is dedicated

to supporting climate change adaptation and resilience-building programs of local

governments and communities. A law, enacted in August 2012, stipulates the

allocation and maintenance of at least P1 billion for the Fund every year,

appropriated through the General Appropriations Act. As regards risk management,

there are several possible approaches, including publicly provided or guaranteed

mechanisms (such as those typically provided by central governments to local

governments in industrialized countries), as well as privately provided options. As

for the latter, an example is weather derivatives like snow derivatives in the US. A

typical arrangement here is that buyers and sellers of snow insurance will agree on a

pre-specified trigger for pay out—usually a fixed number of inches of snowfall which

could then be independently measured. If the accumulated snow is greater than the

trigger, then the seller of the insurance product has to pay out. With thriving snow

insurance markets, these types of contracts could vary in price depending on

historical payouts and scientific evidence on possible precipitation. And since it is an

index-based insurance, there is less information asymmetry thus less moral hazard
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
110
because the trigger (flood or snow) cannot be controlled by any of the parties

involved.1

References

Almeda, Steve (2011), “Proposal on an International Forum on Enterprise Performance in Asia”,


in AIM-IDRC Enterprise Performance in Asia Project, Manila: the Asian Institute of
Management.

Ando, Mitsuyo and Fukunari Kimura (2012), “How Did the Japanese Exports Respond to Two
Crises in the International Production Network?. The Global Financial Crisis and the East
Japan Earthquake.”, ERIA Discussion Paper Series, Economic Research Institute for
ASEAN and the East Asia, Jakarta.

AON Benfield (2012), “2011 Thailand Floods Event Recap Report”. Retrieved from: http:/
/thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20120314_impact_forecasting_thailan
d_flood_event_recap.pdf)

ADB (2009), Enterprises in Asia : Fostering Dynamism in SMEs. Key Indicators for Asia and the
Pacific 2009, Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from:
http://www.adb.org/documents/books/key_indicators/2009/pdf/Special-Chapter-
02.pdf

ADB (2013), “Disaster Risk Management in Asia by the Numbers”, Manila: Asian Development
Bank. Retrieved from: http://www.adb.org/features/disaster-risk-management-asia-
numbers

Balicasan, Aresenio, Sharon Piza, Dennis Mapa, Carlos Abad Santos, and Donna Odra (2010),
“The Philippine economy and poverty during the global economic crisis”, The Philippine
Review of Economics, 47(1):1-37.

Berry, Albert, Edgard Rodriguez and Henry Sandee (2001), “Small and Medium Enterprise
Dynamics in Indonesia”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(3): 363-84.

Correa, P. and Iooty, M. (2010), "The impact of the Global Economic crisis on the corporate
sector in Europe and Central Asia: Evidence from a Firm-level survey", World Bank
Enterprise Note Series No. 9, Washingto, DC. Retrieved from:
http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/FinancialCrisis.

Datt, Gaurav and Hans Hoogeveen (1999), “El Niño or El Peso? Crisis, Poverty and Income
Distribution in the Philippines”, Washington D.C.: World Bank.

del Ninno, Carlo, Paul A. Dorosh, Lisa C. Smith and Dilip K. Roy (2001), “The 1998 Floods in
Bangladesh: Disaster Impacts, Household Coping Strategies, and Response”,
Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

1
See for example: http://business.time.com/2012/01/24/no-snow-no-problem-how-wall-street-profits-from-
weird-weather/ #ixzz2XD21iEsb. Innovative financing and insurance mechanisms to manage risks of various
types are now available in many countries. The interested reader may wish to turn to Kaul and Conceicao (2006)
and Mendoza (2009b) for analyses in this area.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
111
DTI (2011), "Statistics of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)", Manila: Department
of Trade and Industry. Retrieved from: http://www.dti.gov.ph/dti/index.php?p=321.

Frankenberger, Tim, Tom Spangler, Suzanne Nelson and Mark Langworthy (2012), “Enhancing
Resilience to Food Security Shocks in Africa,” TANGO International Discussion Paper,
TANGO International Inc.

Fuentes-Nieva, Ricardo and Papa A. Seck (2010), Risk, Shocks, and Human Development on the
Brink, United Nations Development Programme. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gregory, Gary, Charles Harvie, and Hyun-Hoon Lee (2002), “Korean SMEs in the Wake of the
Financial Crisis: Strategies, Constraints, and Performance in a Global Economy”,
Department of Economics Working Paper Series, University of Wollongong,
Wollongong NSW.

Guimbert, Stephane and Remco Oostendorp (2012), “Weathering the Storm: Responses by
Cambodian Firms to the Global Financial Crisis”, World Bank Policy Research Working
Paper No. 6220, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Harper, Caroline, Nicola Jones, David Stewart and Erika Strand (2012) (eds.), Children in Crisis:
Protecting the Vulnerable and Promoting Recovery for All, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Hodorogel, Roxana Gabriela (2011), “German SMEs Affected by World Crisis”, Theoretical and
Applied Economics 18(9): 139-148.

JSBRI (2009), 2009 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan: Finding Vitality
through Innovation and Human Resources, September 2009, Tokyo: Japan Small Business
Research Institute. Retrieved from:
http://www.chusho.meti.go.jp/pamflet/hakusyo/h21/h21_1/2009hakusho_eng.pdf.

Kaul, I and Pedro Conceicao (2006), The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges.
New York: Oxford University Press.

Kitching, John, Smallbone, David and Xheneti, Mirela (2009), “Have small businesses beaten the
recession?”, paper presented at the 32nd Institute for Small Business and
Entrepreneurship (ISBE) Conference: Celebrating 3 decades of excellence in education,
research and practice: at the cutting edge of international entrepreneurship, 3-6
November, Liverpool.

Kumar, Rajiv and Doren Chadee (2002), “International Competitiveness of Asian Firms: An
Analytical Framework”, Economic and Research Department Working Paper Series No.
4, Manila: Asian Development Bank.

Lempert, Robert, Nidhi Kalra, Suzanne Peyraud, Zhimin Mao, Sinh Bach Tan, Dean Cira and
Alexander Lotsch (2013), “Ensuring Robust Flood Risk Management in Ho Chi Minh
City”, Policy Research Working Paper 6465, Washington, DC.: World Bank.

Lokshin, Michael M. and Ruslan Yemtsov (2004), “Household Strategies of Coping with Shocks in
Post-crisis Russia”, Review of Development Economics, 8 (1): 15-32.

Mendoza, Ronald U. (2009a), “Aggregate shocks, poor households and children: Transmission
channels and policy responses”, Global Social Policy 9(1):55-78.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
112
Mendoza, Ronald U. (2009b), “A Compendium of Policy Instruments to Enhance Financial
Stability and Debt Management in Emerging Market Economies.” CESIfo Economic
Studies, 55(2):353-397.

Narjoko, D. and H. Hill (2007), "Winners and Losers during a Deep Economic crisis: Firm-level
Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing", Asian Economic Journal, 21(4):343-68.

Ngin, Chanrith (2012),“Impact of the Global Financial and Economic Crisis on Employment in
SMEs in Cambodia,” Cambodia Policy Brief No. 04, Cambodia Development Resource
Institute, Phnom Penh.

Ozar, Semsa, Gokhan Ozertan, and Zeynep Burcu Irfanoglu (2008), "Micro and Small enterprise
Growth in Turkey: Under the Shadow of Financial Crisis", The Developing Economies,
XLV(4): 331-62.

The Philippine Star (2011), "World Bank says floods cost Thailand $ 45B", updated 26
November. Retrieved from:
http://www.philstar.com/article.aspx?articleid=752381&publicationsubcategoryid=20
0.

Ramalho,R., Rodriguez-Meza, J., and Yang,J. (2009), How Are Firms in Eastern and Central Europe
Reacting to the Financial Crisis?, World Bank Enterprise Note Series No. 8, Washington,
DC: World Bank. Retrieved from: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/FinancialCrisis.

Sato, Yuri (2000), “How did the Crisis Affect Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises? From a Field
of the metal-Working Industry in Java”, The Developing Economies, 38(4): 572-595.

Skoufias, Emmanuel (2003), “Economic Crises and Natural Disasters: Coping Strategies and
Policy Implications”, World Development, 31(7):1087–1102.

Smit, Barry and Olga Pilifosova (2001), “Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of
Sustainable Development and Equity”, in J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canzianni, N.A. Leary, D.J.
Dokken and K.S. White (eds), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and
Vulnerability - Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.

Tambunan, Tulus Tahi Hamonangan (2009), "Crisis-Adjustment Strategies Adopted by SMEs in


Coping with the 2008-2009 Global Economic Crisis: The Case of Indonesia", Center for
Industry, SME & Business Competition Studies, University of Trisakti. Retrieved from:
http://www.apeaweb.org/ confer/hk10/papers/tambunan.pdf.

Varum, Celeste Amorim and Vera Catarina Barros Rocha (2011), “Do foreign and domestic firms
behave any different during economic slowdowns?”, International Business Review,
20(1): 48–59.

Varum, Celeste Amorim and Vera Catarina Barros Rocha (2013), “Employment and SMEs during
Crises.”, Small Business Economics, 40(1): 9-25. Retrieved from:
http://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007%2 Fs11187-011-9343-6.

ter Wengel, Jan and Edgard Rodriguez (2006), “SME Export Performance in Indonesia after the
Crisis”, Small Business Economics, 26: 25-37.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 78 - 113
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
113
Impacts of Energy Price Subsidy Reform on MSMEs
and Their Adjustment Strategies: a Story from
Indonesia
Tulus T.H. Tambunan
Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies
University of Trisakti
Grogol, West-Jakarta, Indonesia
Email: ttambunan56@yahoo.com
Abstract
This is an exploratory study at the micro level which tried to explore the impacts of energy price
increases on micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. More specifically, it
aimed to answer the following research question: what was the impact of energy price increases
occurred before on MSMEs, and which measures they have taken to cope with the impact? For
that purpose, it has adopted a qualitative approach with three methods of analysis: i) desk
study; (ii) a series of surveys of a total of 193 respondents (owners/managers of MSMEs) in
various cities in Java and West Sumatera, and (iii) focus group discussions (FGDs). Findings of
the study suggest that the overall impacts of energy price increases on MSMEs depend on their
current capacity to mitigate the impact. However, the type of mitigation varies across MSMEs,
depending various factor, including the current availability of financial resources and current
market condition which determines to what extent the MSMEs can increase their selling prices
or reduce the size of their made goods without losing their customers or market shares.
Key words: MSMEs, energy price subsidies, Jakarta, Semarang, Padang, Solo
JEL codes:D22,D24,E62,H32,L25

Introduction

The Indonesian government has been subsidizing energy for more than 30

years1, since the 'new order' era. Windfall profits from rising oil prices in the

international market, together with low levels of oil domestic consumption, have

allowed the government to provide these energy subsidies. Although net profits from oil

production started to decrease (as oil production costs increased) from 1975, the

government kept subsidizing energy with the intention of maintaining the purchasing

power of the poor. However, as domestic demand for energy (especially gasoline)

1
See, e.g. Beaton and Lontoh (2010), Braithwaite, et al. (2012), Casier and Beaton (2015), IMF (2013).
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
114
continued to increase, the government’s budgeted amounts for energy subsidies rose

significantly. In response, the government started to reassess the public benefits of

energy subsidies and showed its willingness to eliminate energy subsidy and to reform

its energy policy in general (Adam and Lestari, 2008). In the aftermath of the 1997–

1998 Asian financial crisis, as part of a supported adjustment program from the

International Monetary Fund (IMF), on May 5, 1998 the government announced an

increase in the price of kerosene by 25%, of diesel fuel by 60%, and of gasoline by 71%.

This drastic increase triggered protests in the two weeks after the announcement and,

along with a complex range of other factors including dissatisfaction with the

government, eventually led to the end of President Suharto‘s rule (Beaton and Lontoh,

2010; IMF, 2013).

Since then, reforming energy price subsidies has been a persistent policy

challenge for the Indonesian government. The subsidized energy price in the country

has fluctuated considerably over time (Figure 1), reflecting changes in international

prices for oil, the exchange rate, and the subsidy regime. The first two factors have

become key determinants since 2004, when Indonesia became a net importer of oil for

the first time2. The fiscal cost, especially for the fuel subsidy (in Indonesia known as

BBM or bahan bakar minyak) has been large. In 2008 it reached 2.8% of gross domestic

product (GDP) (IMF, 2013), and, based on data from state budget 2014, total subsidies

for energy in 2014 reached Rp350.3 trillion (Indonesian rupiah) (or approximately US$

28 billion at current exchange rate) including Rp246.5 trillion (US$ 19.72 billion) for

fossil fuels (kerosene, diesel and gasoline), or about 16.2% of GDP fourth quarter 2014

(based on constant market price) (Ministry of Finance, 2014; BPS, 2015). This fiscal
2
Since Indonesia became a net oil importer, current domestic market prices for oil (in rupiah) and hence current
amount of oil price subsidy have been strongly influenced by current international prices for oil as well as
current exchange rate of the rupiah against the US dollar. Especially since Jokowi became the new President, he
has decided that domestic prices for oil should be fully link to international prices for oil.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
115
burden has crowded out core expenditures for the country’s development, including

infrastructure, education and health care, especially for the poor.

Figure 1. Prices of Gasoline (Premium) and Diesel (Solar) in Indonesia, 1993 to


2014 (Rp/liter)
Rp/liter

Period
Source: Kompas Newspaper (2014a).

The new government under President Joko Widodo is determined to continue

with energy price reform. In November 2014 the government increased the price of

gasoline (premium) by Rp3,000 (US$0.24) per liter and in January 2015 the government

implemented a new pricing mechanism for fuel prices that allowed the government to

set prices in accordance with international oil prices. Additionally, subsidies for

premium were removed entirely and the subsidies for diesel were capped at Rp1,000

(US$0.08). As a direct consequence of this new, more market-based pricing mechanism

the prices of diesel and gasoline decreased in line with international oil prices (Casier

and Beaton, 2015).

The Indonesian government is determined to continue with energy subsidy

reform and to eliminate subsidies on all energy items (i.e. BBM, 12kg-cylinder LPG, and

electricity) not only because of the fiscal burden, but also no evidence that energy

subsidies do benefit the poor and low-income households, the group at which they were

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
116
aimed. Energy subsidy reform combined with volatile international oil prices and

exchange rate fluctuations of the Indonesian rupiah against the U.S. dollar, is worrying

both final consumers as well as producers and business owners, including those in

micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). In general, these enterprises are

less energy-intensive than large enterprises (LEs) but they are also more vulnerable.

While the direct financial impacts of fuel subsidy reform and the consecutive energy

price increases may not be as serious as those experienced by LEs, the capacity of

MSMEs to cope with any negative impact is likely to be much lower, and the actual

impact may be much more severe (Tambunan, 2014). Energy price subsidy reform has

become one of the most politically sensitive issues in the country. The main reason is

simply because the majority of the Indonesian population is still from the low income

group, and poverty, though declining (at least based on official data), is still a serious

issue. The majority of this part of the country's population has income sources from

low-income generating activities including micro and small enterprises (MSEs) and in

the informal sector. No doubt, energy or fossil-fuel subsidies do really matter for them.

That is why every time the government reduces energy price subsidies, it is generally

expected that many of these activities will collapse and poverty will increase3.

Based on the above background, this study provides an analysis of the impacts of

energy price increases caused by subsidy removal on MSMEs in Indonesia 4. It surveys

193 MSMEs in two groups of manufacturing industries (i.e. the food and beverages

industry and textile and garment industry), and in several other sectors, i.e. retail, food

3See discussions on this issue in e.g. Adam and Lestari (2008), APSN (2008), Citra Indonesia (2013),
Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (2013), Kompas (2012), Purwanto (2013), and Rizal (2007).
4Although the prices of gasoline, kerosene and diesel fuel (solar) differ for industrial and individual

buyers, this paper does not discuss industrial customer prices.


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
117
and drink stalls, and services. The aim of this study is to answer the following two key

questions:

1) What was the impact of previous energy price increases due to subsidy removal on

businesses?

2) Which measures have MSMEs taken to cope with the impacts, and what was the

result?

Given that the nature of this study is an exploratory study at the micro level, it

has adopted a qualitative approach. Three methods of analysis were used: i) desk study

on available key literature (both theoretical and empirical) on the impact of energy

price increases on MSMEs in Indonesia and other (mainly) developing countries; (ii)

field surveys and in-depth interviews; and (iii) focus group discussions (FGDs) with key

stakeholders5. A total of 193 MSMEs were selected randomly in four locations: Solo city

and Semarang city in the Province of Central Java, DKI Jakarta and its surrounding areas,

and Padang city and its surrounding areas in the Province of West Sumatera. The

respondents were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire.

Table 1 gives an overview of number of respondents per location, sector, and

time of the survey and FGD. The random selection of respondents in these cities was

conducted based on various sources of information: (i) membership lists provided by

the regional Chamber of Commerce (Kadin) in Solo, Semarang, and DKI Jakarta, (ii) lists

of MSMEs from regional offices of the Ministry for Cooperative and SME (Kantor Dinas

Koperasi & UKM), (iii) Directory of MSMEs by industry, province and city in Indonesia

5From the government, they were officials from the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Trade, and the
Ministry of Cooperative and Small and Medium Enterprises. The levels of officials were such as directors
or vice ministries. From the private sector they were directors, heads or chairmen of regional/local
chamber of commerce and industry (Kadin), Indonesian Association of Food and Beverages Producers,
Indonesian Association of Textile Industry (API), Indonesian Association of Entrepreneurs (APINDO),
non-government organizations (NGOs) , and other relevant/related business associations. Also some
researchers from local universities were participated.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
118
from the Ministry for Cooperative and SME in Jakarta, and (iv) most recent unpublished

list of some clusters provided by the Ministry. Based on these lists, initially, invitation

letters were sent randomly to more than the actual number of respondents. For

instance, in Solo, more than 25 MSMEs were invited to come to an introduction meeting

in the office of Kadin Solo. But, only 25 owners of MSMEs came. Except in Padang, many

of the 40 respondents were selected on the spot during the survey.

Table 1. Samples and the Process of The Surveys and FGDs


Location Sample (MSMEs) Sector Period of Survey Period of FGD
Solo 25 Textile & garment industries November 2014 November 2014
Semarang 29 Food & beverages industries December 2014 –
Jakarta 99 Trade (retail, shop, boutique); January 2015 December 2014
food, beverages, garment & February 2015
furniture industries; food and
drink stalls; restaurants;
publishers; services
Padang 40 Food & garment industries, January-February –
restaurant 2015

The selection of the cities was mainly based on opportunities to collaborate with

local institutions (i.e. regional chamber of commerce and industry, and regional office of

the Ministry for Cooperative and SME) in conducting the surveys and the FGDs. The

selection of the sectors is based on the fact that these are among key sectors of MSMEs 6.

The structure of the questionnaire and the analytical framework are based on

the hypothesis that the impact on firms of the cutting of energy subsidies and their

responsiveness or their adopted adjustment measures are influenced by various

internal factors including fender of owners or producers or managers of the firms, their

current business performance, their recent level of energy consumption, their past

experiences with the effects of energy price changes on their businesses and hence their

6Although it is generally expected that both the type of energy and the intensity of energy consumption
(or the share of energy cost in total production cost) varies by sector or group of industry, and this fact
may have a serious implication for the study, due to limited time and fund available for doing the study,
only these sectors and groups of industry were selected for the survey.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
119
adopted mitigation strategies, their opinions or perception and their own assessment of

energy prices, their expectations of future prices of energy, and their past experience

with government support programs to mitigate impact of energy subsidy reform.

The above approach is based on various similar studies conducted by

researchers such as Braithwaite et al. (2012) for the case of Indonesia, and probably

most recently Hoai and Tran (2013) for the case of Viet Nam, which both assessed the

possible strategies of firms to cope with energy subsidy removal. Hoai and Tran’s

(2013) study includes the following salient observations: First, many firms interviewed

never assessed their current energy efficiency (they might also have had no idea about

the price of energy in their country and the extent of energy subsidization). Second,

firms of different sizes, with different ownership structures, and of different energy

intensities have different understandings of energy prices and different expectations of

energy price increases. Third, as generally expected, the increase of energy prices does

affect firms, but the extent of the impact is not significant. Finally, three types of coping

measures are most frequently chosen by firms faced with any given energy price

increase, namely raising their selling price, using energy more efficiently, and improving

their current technology in order to make their production process less energyintensive

(Hoai and Tran, 2013).

Braithwaite et al. (2012) found that firms in Indonesia with different energy

intensities have different opinions about the energy subsidy reform policy because the

impact also differs. For instance, car manufacturers are among those who are strongly

against the policy as it may have a negative effect on market demand for new cars.

However, oil importers (though not for the Indonesian state-owned oil company,

Pertamina) are among those who are in favor of the policy, as it may increase local

demand for non-subsidized oil products.


International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
120
Overview of MSMEs in Indonesia and Their Main Constraints

As in many developing countries, MSMEs in Indonesia are very numerous,

amounting to almost 58 million in 2013 (Table 2). They have always been the main

drivers of domestic economic activity in Indonesia, accounting for more than 99% of all

existing firms across sectors. They provide employment opportunities for over 90% of

the country’s workforce. Especially MSEs generate a significant amount of not only

primary but also in many cases, secondary income sources for low-income households.

For instance, in many small or poor farm households, men (husband) work in the field

while women (their wives) own small businesses at home making simple handicraft

items or food products, or running small shops selling basic need items. Indonesian

MSEs (as in developing countries in general) look very different, however, than MSEs in

more developed economies. Indonesian MSEs, which are about 99% of total MSMEs in

the country have the following key characteristics (Tambunan, 2009a,b, 2014): (i) they

are unregistered and operate in the informal sector; (ii) they do not employ modern

systems of organization, management and accounting; (iii) they are dominated by self-

employment businesses using unpaid family members as helpers; (iv) they are

scattered widely throughout rural areas, and, therefore, are likely to play an important

role in helping villagers, particularly women, to develop their entrepreneur skills; (v)

most of them are established by poor households or individuals who could not find

better job opportunities elsewhere. Because of these characteristics, most of the

enterprises have low productivity, produce comparatively inferior goods and have

difficulties accessing necessary inputs, including capital, high-quality labor, technology

and information; (vi) because their made products are mainly inferior, they can only sell

their product locally, while the majority of them lack access to regional or national

market and also more difficult in marketing their products abroad; and (vii) most MSEs
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
121
are found in rural areas and owned by farm households. So, this sub-category of MSMEs

plays an important role in stimulating rural economic development.

Table 2. Total enterprises by size in all economic sectors in Indonesia, 2009-2013


(units)
Size category 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
MIEs 52,176,795 53,207,500 54,559,969 55,856,176 57,189,393
SEs 546,675 573,601 602,195 629,418 654,222
MEs 41,133 42,631 44,280 48,997 52,106
LEs 4,677 4,838 4,952 4,968 5,066
Total 52,769, 280 53,828,570 55,211,396 56,539,559 57,900,787
Sources: Tambunan (2014); BPS (2010, 2013).

Further, Table 3 provides an overview of the business development constraints

that MSEs in the manufacturing industry often face. It shows that only a very small

proportion of the surveyed respondents indicated that high energy prices or short

supply of energy as a serious constraint. However, the proportion of those considering

high price or short supply of fuel/energy as their most serious problem has been found

to vary by groups of industry.

Table 3. Total MSEs in the Manufacturing Industry by Main Constraints in


Indonesia, 2010 and 2013
2010 2013
Status Total units % Total units %
Have no serious obstacles 599,591 21.94 839,903 24.57
Have serious obstacles 2,133,133 78.06 2,578,463 75.43
Total respondents 2,732,724 100.00 3,418,366 100.00
Serious obstacles: Total units % Total units %
Lack of capital 806,538 37.81 957,339 37.13
Marketing difficulties 495,100 23.21 535,176 20.76
Lack or high prices of raw materials 483,581 22.67 629,542 24.42
Other main constraints 184,516 8.65 267,612 10.38
High labour costs or lack of skilled workers 88,952 4.17 102,611 3.98
Transportation / distribution obstacles 39,676 1.86 39,255 1.52
High price or short supply of energy 34,770 1.63 46,928 1.82
Total respondents 2,133,133 100.00 2,578,463 100.00
Sources: Tambunan (2008a,b) and BPS (2010a, 2013)

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
122
The Importance of Energy in the Cost Structures of MSMEs

Although it is generally known that MSMEs, particularly MSEs, are much less

energy-intensive than LEs, energy costs are still significant, running from around 10%

to more than 65% of the total cost of production for many of them (USAID, 2008). For

MSEs, BPS surveys do not provide data on detailed cost structures or composition of

inputs used. There are, however, some case studies based on field surveys which show

that energy costs are not the largest component of total production costs for MSEs in

Indonesia, although the percentage share varies by industry group. For instance,

findings from a field survey conducted by BI and PS-IUKMPU (2010) show that

operation costs are just a small component of total production costs for MSEs in wood

processing, food and beverages, textile and footwear industries in some regions in the

country, including in West Sumatera and West and East Java (Table 4). Operation costs

include energy costs, but energy is not necessarily the dominant component. For

example, in the wood-processing industry, the share of energy costs in total operation

costs is about 13.55%. In other industries the share is much higher, such as the food and

beverages industry, where fuel costs represent 42.4% of operations costs (BI and PS-

IUKMPU, 2010). MSMEs in the latter industry use boilers as the source of steam for their

production processes. Coal, diesel, and oil are the common fuels for operating the

boilers, which result in high production cost for the MSMEs (BI and PS-IUKMPU, 2010).

Thus, the variety of proportion of fuel or energy costs to production costs across

industries is due to two main factors: (i) type of good produced, which determines the

nature of production process and hence energy intensity (i.e., whether they are labour-,

capital- or energy-intensive), and (ii) level of efficiency in using energy relative to that

in using raw materials and production factors (e.g. labor).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
123
Table 4. Cost Structure of MSEs in Selected Group of Industry, 2010
Selected Group of industry % share
Key raw materials Supporting materials Labour Operational Capital
Wood processing 64.07 4.42 26.40 4.48 0.63
Food and beverages 69.9 11.6 11.2 5.9 1.4
Textile 63.2 7.69 21.51 5.78 1.82
Footwear 56.6 10.3 27.0 4.1 2.0
Source: BI & PS-IUKMPU (2010).

For MEs in the manufacturing industry, there are national data presented by BPS

in its annual publication Statistics for Medium and Large Industry. It reveals that the

energy is not the largest component of MEs’ total production costs, although energy cost

share varies by industry group. Figure 2 shows that the largest component of total

production costs in this category of manufacturing enterprises is for buying raw

materials, which averages around 81%, compared to energy costs of only around 8.8%.

This might be attributable to the fact that, on one hand, fuel has been so cheap, and on

the other, raw materials are often more costly than energy, not only because prices of

raw materials are not subsidized but also most of them are imported. However, when

the price of energy increases drastically, it might still have an important impact given

the quantity of fuel that is necessary for the production processes. Or, if energy price

increases have a significant impact on prices of raw materials, the cost of energy might

still have a serious impact even on firms with a low share of energy in their total costs.

Figure 2. Cost Structure of MEs in the Manufacturing Industry, 2010


Percentage share of inputs costs in total costs

Cost components
Source: BPS (2010b).

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
124
Literature Review: Impact of energy price increases on MSMEs

Theoretical Framework

An increase in energy prices will have both direct and indirect effects on firms

(Figure 3). Direct effects occur when an increase in energy prices directly impacts a

firm’s energy costs (i.e. energy cost paid increases). Indirect effects are the ones that

affect a firm's production costs through increases in the prices of raw materials costs,

transportation costs, capital costs and other costs. It also affects negatively consumer's

real income (e.g. Rizal, 2007; Casier and Beaton, 2015; Sinaga, 2013; APSN, 2008;

Widodo et al., 2012; Ayarkwa, 2014). More explanations are given below.

Figure 3. Main Channels of the Impact of the Increase in Fuel Price on MSMEs

Fuel price

Consumers’
Direct impacts

Other Transportation Raw material Capital


real income
costs ↑ costs ↑ costs ↑ costs ↑

MSMEs

Some Evidence from Indonesia

Table 4 on cost structure of MSEs in certain industries and Figure 2 on cost

structure of MEs in the manufacturing industry suggests that the direct effects of an

increase in energy prices on these enterprises may not be significant, especially if the

increase is only small. Indirect effects on MSMEs, on the other hand, are generally
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
125
expected to be more significant than direct effects. Only one case study in North

Sumatra in 2007 indicated that the business performance of local MSMEs was not

significantly affected by the increase in fuel price in 2005 (Rizal, 2007).

Direct Effects

The degree of an increase in energy cost on a firm caused directly by an increase

in energy price will of course vary by industry, according to the amount used (e.g. heavy

industries using many machines use more electricity than small producers of

handicrafts), and the type of energy used (e.g. if electricity price increases, only those

enterprises using electricity as their main energy will suffer higher cost of energy).

Braithwaite et al. (2012) conducted a study that assessed the possible responses

of firms to cope with energy subsidy removal in Indonesia. Specifically, sectors such as

the transportation or fisheries sector (vessels for inter-island transport and for fishing

use a significant amount of subsidized fuel) are against the reduction of subsidy as it

will certainly increase their operational cost. Also car producers and assemblers,

although they use electricity as their main source of power, are against the removal of

oil subsidy because they are concerned that, as an indirect effect, their car sales are

likely to decline as potential buyers may postpone buying new cars when fuel is

expensive.

As mentioned in Tambunan (2013, 2014), in the East Java city of Malang, at least

10,000 local MSMEs faced bankruptcy due to the sharp rise in operating costs

(especially transportation costs) that followed the fuel price change. Although the

resulting increase in production costs in 2013 was not as bad as when fuel prices were

increased in 2005, it has still created significant problems for many MSMEs.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
126
According to Purwanto (2013), the BPS and the State Ministry for Cooperatives

and SMEs have estimated that the impact of the fuel price reform has generated

financial problems for many MSMEs in Indonesia.

MSMEs making bread in Indonesia are very dependent on LPG. Energy costs

represent 7% to 8% of the total cost of bread production. The 35% price rise of 12 kg

cylinder LPG in March 2013 caused an increase of 2% in the cost of bread production.

Total energy costs, which included increases in the cost of electricity, rose by 10% (Citra

Indonesia, 2013). The price of 12 kg-cyclinder LPG rose in January 2015, which pushed

entrepreneurs in the food sector to raise their output prices, which may lead to a higher

inflation rate (Tempo Online, 2014). Other producers shifted from 12 kg to 3 kg

cylinder LPG to avoid a price increase in their end product (Tempo Online, 2015).

This demonstrates that the increase in energy cost also depends on the

adjustment measures taken by producers in terms of energy efficiency or seeking

cheaper alternatives.

Indirect effects

A) Transportation fare price increases


Indirect impacts occur through the knock-on effects that fuel price rises have on

other aspects of MSME businesses. When the government decided to increase fuel

prices in July 2013, transportation fares went up. According to the Organisation of Land

Transportation, transportation fares could have increased up to 35%, but the

government capped the increase at a maximum of 20% (Republika Online, 2013a). The

November 2014 reforms led to an increase in public transportation fares by Rp1,000

(US$ 0.08) (Kompas, 2014b). Recently, the government reduced the price of fuels but

transportation fares did not decline. This does not come as a surprise given the long

experience showing that prices of many basic consumption goods always went up along
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
127
with the increase in energy prices, but when the fuel prices returned to their previous

levels, not all the prices of these goods declined. This phenomenon is also known as

price stickiness or asymmetric pricing (Casier and Beaton, 2015).

B) Raw material price increases, inflation and less disposable real income
An increase in transportation fares caused by an increase in fuel price usually

causes the prices of raw materials and various food items to rise too, though the

increase varies by region, depending on many factors including location from the supply

source of energy, local transportation system and facilities, local distribution system of

energy, and level of local market distortion. A survey conducted by the Ministry for

Cooperatives and SMEs in 2006 (cited in Sinaga, 2013), shows that product costs and

business incomes were affected considerably by the increase of fuel prices. The survey

covered 37,950 MSMEs in over 33 provinces that use kerosene, solar oil and gasoline in

a range of businesses, including food processing, rice milling, fishery, food stalls, batik

(Indonesian traditional cloth), industries making simple building materials like tiles and

brick, and city transportation. It found that production costs increased by an average of

28.1% (in MIEs by 34%; in SEs by 24.6%; and in MEs by 29.6%) and that net income

dropped by 18.37% (Sinaga, 2013). About 76.8% of the total number of MSMEs

surveyed increased their sales prices; 45.4% reduced the size or quantity of their

products; 63.6% reduced quality of their products; 39.7% reduced their profit margins;

39.7% had increased production cost efficiency; and 6.11% pursued “other” strategies

in addition to the above (Sinaga, 2013).

In 2008, Tempo Magazine announced that the increase in the price of fuel in late

May 2008 resulted in the collapse of thousands of MSMEs in the Tangerang regency in

the Province of Banten (APSN, 2008) Around 50% of the 17,353 MSMEs in the region

had closed down due to bankruptcy, which included food stall traders, handicraft
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
128
industries, and cottage industries, especially those producing kerupuk (chips made of

flour flavored with fish or shrimp), tempe and tofu. Many of the MSMEs had closed down

because of increases in the price of raw materials, public transport fares and production

costs caused by the increase in the price of fuel in that May 2008, while the remaining

businesses were struggling to survive, with dim prospects for the future (APSN, 2008).

According to Kompas newspaper (2012) many producers of tahu and tempe in

two districts, (Banyumas and Kebumen) in the Province of Central Java were expected

to go bankrupt as a consequence of the increase in fuel price, indirectly due to the

higher price they had to pay for their key imported raw material (soybean) caused by

higher transportation costs, as it had to be brought from the harbor in Jakarta.

Based on calculations by the Ministry of Trade, as a consequence of the increase

in fuel price in July 2013 prices of necessity goods and services would increase by a

minimum of 5% to a maximum of 10% or, on average, around 8.2%. In reality, however,

it was even higher (Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, 2013). The direct and indirect impact of

the July 2013 decision on fuel price increase on inflation was 2.45% with the following

specification: the indirect effects on public transportation fares and commodities (food

and other core items) was, respectively, 0.82% and 0.40%, and the direct impact

estimated at 1.23%. According to the Indonesian Central Bank, Bank Indonesia (BI), the

impact would last for three months notably in the public transport cost (B2B, 2013).

Increases in fuel prices also lead to a rise in general prices that reduces the real

disposable income of employees or workers, which in turn generates pressure on firms

to increase wages (UNDP, 2014). In November 2014, workers from many factories took

to the streets in Jakarta and some other cities in Java demanding higher wages (Kompas,

2014a)

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
129
In 2013, BI said that, as a result of the rise in the price of fuel, inflation that year

could surge to as high as 7.9%, exceeding the government’s estimate of 7.2%. The actual

inflation rate in December 2013 reached 8.38% and in December 2014 8.36% (BPS,

2015). The Indonesia Economic Quarterly report issued by the World Bank in December

2014 stated that the 2014 and 2015 projected annual average Consumption Price Index

(CPI) inflation rate has been revised up to 6.3% and 7.3% (year-on-year), respectively,

to account for the effect of the increase in subsidized fuel prices. Moreover, in

November 2014, BI announced a 25 basis points increase in its policy rate, as a signal to

restrain inflation expectations (World Bank, 2014).

Based on findings from studies in other countries, such as Widodo et al (2012)

and Jamal and Ayarkwa (2014), the channels through which a rise in fuel price affects

MSMEs indirectly can be categorized into two key linkages, namely consumption

linkages (i.e., local demand for MSMEs' products declines) and production linkages. The

latter consists further of two sub-linkages, i.e., backward linkages (raw materials

become more expensive) and forward linkages (more transport costs paid to distribute

MSMEs' products to the market).

C) Increase in interest rate and difficult access to credit


An increase in fuel price could also lead to an increase in interest rate as

normally the monetary authority increases interest rate in responding to the increase in

general prices (inflation) (Mishkin, 1992), which means higher capital costs for MSMEs

which finance their operations with loans. For instance, in response to the increase in

the inflation rate, and also to the continued depreciation of the rupiah, the Indonesian

monetary authority has decided to increase the BI interest rate from 6.0% in June 2013

(or 5.75% in May 2013) to 6.5%, making the cost of capital or credit more expensive

(BI, 2013)
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
130
This can have a serious indirect effect on bank loan dependent-MSMEs, though in

Indonesia as in other developing countries they are only a small percentage of total

MSMEs. However, MSMEs that are not dependent on capital from banks may also be

affected if they have business or production linkages with formal credit dependent-LEs

(e.g., trading companies and large-sized assembling cars producers). Theoretically, if

those firms have financial problems caused by higher interest rates, and therefore have

to reduce production or even go out of business, their subcontracted or business-related

MSMEs will also go down with them.

Field Survey: Findings ad Discussion

Profiles of Respondents

Table 5 provides information regarding four key profiles of the respondents,

namely gender, market orientation, changes in revenues and cost components of energy

in their total production costs.

With respect to their revenues in the past few years, in Solo, nine respondents

said that their revenues in 2014 compared to 2013 and 2012 were more or less stable,

and 11 respondents experienced an increase in their revenues. The remaining nine

respondents stated that their revenues in 2014 declined for various reasons, such as

tight market competition or a decline in demand caused by the reduction in consumer

purchasing power and increased prices for raw materials; a few of them also said higher

energy prices in the past two years also contributed to the decline in their production or

revenues. In Semarang, the majority of the respondents said that their revenues

increased in the past few years. For those whose revenues declined in the past few

years, the main causes indicated were more competitors, less market demand, change in

management, and fewer outlets.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
131
Table 5. Key Profiles of the Respondents in the Four Locations, 2014
Aspects Unit Solo Semarang Jakarta Padang
Ratio of females to males Number of respondents 11/18 16/9 35/64 28/12
Market orientation: Number of respondents
-Only domestic market 12 23 94 40
-Only foreign market 3 - - -
-both markets 14 2 5 -
Revenue during 2012–2013: Number of respondents
- relative stable 9 3 23 9
-increased 11 16 55 16
-declined 9 6 21 15
Cost components of Energy: Percentage
-Petroleum: -average per 2.6 3.2 5.8 9.4
respondent:
-maximum: 10.0 20 40 50
-minimum: 1.0 2 0.8 5
-LPG: -average per 1.5 12.4 8.99 9.1
respondent:
-maximum: 10 30 35 70
-minimum: 2 1 0.5 5

-Electricity: -average per 11.5 13.3 12.3 9.1


respondent:
-maximum: 25 30 60.0 80
-minimum 0.8 2 1.44 5
Source: field surveys November-December 2014, and January-February 2015

In Jakarta, the revenues of the majority of the respondents increased, at least in

2014 compared to 2013. Those who experienced a decline in their revenues said that

the drop in consumers' purchasing power was the main cause; while a few others said

that the increased prices of raw materials pushed them to reduce their production

volume. In Padang, 15 respondents experienced a decline in their revenues in 2014

compared to 2013 (although some of them experienced an increase in 2013 compared

to 2012), mainly caused by the deterioration of consumer purchasing power; only one

respondent said that the rise of prices of raw materials, which occurred almost yearly,

has been the main factor. The decline in market demand due to the decline in

consumers' purchasing power and the increase of prices of raw materials may reflect

the indirect effects of energy price increases. Some of the respondents in Semarang who

experienced a decline in their revenues in the past few years (as well as the participants

in the FGD in Semarang) support this assumption. One producer of Indonesian

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
132
traditional cake (lapis legit) said that when energy price increases, consumers,

especially from middle- to low-income groups, reduce their demand for unnecessary

items, including discretionary food purchases. Regarding the cost components of

energy, in Solo, petroleum cost on average per respondent is around 2.6%, higher than

LPG cost but much lower than electricity cost; in Semarang and Jakarta the average

electricity cost is higher than average cost of the other two energy items; and in Padang

the average costs for the three items are not significantly different.

Impact of Energy Price Increases

To assess the impact of energy price increases after energy subsidy reforms the

respondents were given two questions: (1) how would your businesses be affected if

energy prices increase in the near future, and (2) what were the actual impacts on your

businesses from energy price increases in previous years? The findings presented in

Table 6 suggest that, in general, an increase in energy price will have an impact on firms,

but not always be considered by the respondents as serious, at least not directly. Only a

small number of respondents (15 respondents for future increase and 24 respondents

for the past experiences) in all cities surveyed said no impact. They also expect that in

the future the impact will be small, at least with

respect to direct effects7.


The importance of indirect effects will depend, however, on the type of energy. In

Solo, the respondents are producers of textile or garments, and electricity is their most

important energy source. In Semarang, the respondents are food and beverages

industries, and LPG is their main energy. So, as also based on their past experiences

with price increases of energy, the survey does indicate a complementary/competitive

7Although their answers were based on a self-reporting procedure which means that they may not gave
the correct information, since the nature of this study is exploration, it may not be so problematic.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
133
effect between premium and electricity or LPG used in the production process of MSMEs

surveyed.

From their experiences with price increases of Premium that occurred several

times in the past, the impact was mainly through higher transportation costs that they

had to pay for bringing their products to their markets. Some also said that in the past

few years, prices of some materials they used also increased. Some of them commented

that the main reason for the decline in their production volume during the period of fuel

price increases was due to the increase in their production costs, not because market

demand declined. For other respondents, the decline in consumers' purchasing power,

which they attributed to energy subsidy reforms, was the main cause of the decline.

Table 6. The Experienced and Expected Impacts of Energy Price Increases on


Respondents' Businesses (# of respondents)
Solo Semarang Jakarta Padang Across the different
regions
Future Increase
-No impact - - 10 5 15
-Production volume would decline very 12 13 33 9 67
much 17 12 56 26 111
-Production volume would decline 29 25 99 40 193
slightly
Total
Past Experiences
No impact - 5 13 6 24
-Production volume declined very much 5 10 20 7 42
-Production volume declined slightly 24 10 66 27 127
Total 29 25 99 40 193
Source: Field survey, November–December 2014 and January–February 2015.

Many of the respondents said that their production will not be affected if the

price of energy increases less than 5%, as they have enough profit margins to cover the

price increases of energy. However, this figure drops sharply when the price increases

more than 5%. Only few producers said that there would be no impact even if the price

of fuel increases up to 20%. This may suggest that producers with larger profit margins

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
134
are more able to maintain their production volume than those with smaller profit

margins in the case of price increases of energy.

Overall, the findings from Solo, Semarang, Jakarta and Padang suggest that firms

are sensitive to the increase in the energy prices, although the extent of the impact may

vary by firm depending on many factors, including type of goods produce, profit margin,

and current level of efficiency in using energy, both of which determine the extent of

energy they consume, and their coping measures or their responsiveness to energy

price increases.

Reactions to Energy Price Increases

How a firm copes with the shock of a price increases is crucial, as it will

determine the extent or the level of seriousness of its impact on the firm. During the

survey, respondents were asked about their possible responses to different rates of

energy price increases. A multi-option question was designed, with a set of 10

alternative mitigation measures. In Solo case, it was found that for energy price

increases of less than 5%, the option mostly frequently chosen is "doing nothing." Thus,

a price increase of less than 5% does not seem to be considered as major problem and

therefore does not require special adjustment. If energy prices increase between 5%

and 10%, two options chosen by the majority are "raising the output price," and "using

energy more efficiently." These two options become less likely the higher the price

increase. Options such as "using other alternative energies" and "using alternative raw

materials" are more frequently chosen the higher the energy price increase becomes.

The case of Semarang shows a similar picture. However, many respondents tend to

increase their prices even if the price of energy increases less than 5%. The Jakarta case

shows that if energy prices increase less than 5% there is no need to make any

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
135
adjustment. However, one interesting fact from this case is that there are few

respondents who said that no special measures will be taken for any energy price

increases, as they have never done that in the past. In Padang all respondents said that if

the energy price increase is 5% or less no adjustment would be needed. For percentage

increases beyond that, an adjusted sales price is the more popular response. As in Solo,

a small number of respondents in Padang said that if energy prices increase beyond

20% they probably must close their business because that is a price level they cannot

adjust for. Table 7 gives an overall picture.

Table 7. Types of Coping Measures Selected by the Respondents with Different


Rates of Energy Price Increases Across the Different Regions (%).
Energy price increases by <5% 5-10% 10-15% 15-20% 20-30% >30%

Type of coping measures


Doing nothing 59 20.4 3.4 0.4 0.3 0.7
Raising output price 16.8 33.1 34.8 24.2 19.2 24.3
Fostering energy saving or using more efficiently 6.2 17.8 19.1 15.4 12.7 9.5
Using other alternative energies 1.3 7.3 12 11.9 10.2 3.5
Reducing production volume/scale 3.5 5.5 11.1 13.2 11.7 9.5
Using energy-saving technology 5.3 6.9 8.3 13.6 12.6 9.9
Producing other, less energy-intensive products 1.3 0.4 2.6 7.4 9.6 3.9
Reducing other cost components (e.g., fewer
workers) 4.4 4.4 4.3 8.9 12 9.9
Using alternative raw materials 3.1 4.4 5.1 5.2 11.2 6.7
Close operation - - - - 0.6 22.1
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: Field survey, February 2015

Raising the sale price is often chosen as the first or short-term coping

measure by firms in addressing price increases of not only energy but also raw

materials, due to energy subsidy reforms. It is the solution that is the easiest to put in

place, more than, for example focusing on energy efficiency measures.

However, raising the sales price has one important limitation: the price elasticity

of demand of the product. Rice, a staple food in Indonesia, has a very low degree of

substitution. Increasing prices will be noticeable. For meat, corn or fish, the

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
136
substitutability is much higher and consumers will shift more quickly to substitutes.

Also restaurant owners have limitations on price increases. At a certain price level

customers may decide not to have dinner any more in their restaurants, as has

happened with many owners of small food stalls in Jakarta and many other cities. When

the price of LPG-12 kg increased on January 2, 2015, they did not raise their prices

because they were afraid their consumers (mainly from middle to low income groups)

will go away; instead they moved to LPG-3 kg (Tempo Online, 2015). Indeed,

respondents in all three cities who did not choose raising the output price as their first

choice of strategy said that they were afraid their consumers will go elsewhere.

Producers were also asked whether they would be able to cope (or have no

serious difficulties coping) with volatile prices, and if not, what are the main reasons. As

can be seen in Table 8, the majority of total respondents in all cities (142) have no

difficulties coping with energy price increases. Of those who said that they would not be

able to cope with energy price increases, the main reason for most of them is difficulty

in raising their output prices, as they may risk losing their market competitiveness and

market share.

Table 8. Respondents' Capacity to Response (# of respondents)


Solo Semarang Jakarta Padang Across
the cities
Able to cope (have no difficulties) 19 22 67 34 142
Not able to cope (have difficulties) 10 3 32 6 51
Main Reasons:
- has no enough resources (especially capital) to cope with 2 3 5 4 14
-difficulty in making a price adjustment due to heavy 8 - 23 1 32
market competition - - 4 1 5
-has no other options left to make more efficient in using - - - - -
energy
-other reasons
Total 29 25 99 40 193
Source: Field survey, November–December 2014 and January–February 2015.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
137
Conclusion and Policy Recommendation

This study suggests that impact of energy price increases as a consequence of

energy subsidy reform on MSMEs varies not only by sector or industry and region, but

also by individual enterprises in the same industry and region. The variation of the

impact is due to a number of factors, including MSMEs' capacity to mitigate the impact

of subsidy and, consequently, price reforms, and the capacity to cope with the increases

also varies across individual MSMEs, depending on (1) availability of financial resources

to make internal adjustments in such things as production process, composition of raw

materials/inputs, types of machines or tools to be used, and (2) on the current level of

market competition, which determines to what extent the MSMEs can increase their

selling prices, reduce the size of the production of their goods, change the composition

of raw materials in their products, or shift to alternative energy sources, without losing

their customers or market shares.

Based on the data collected, this study may suggest that the indirect impacts of

energy price increases have the most serious effects on MSMEs: higher transportation

costs (especially land transportation), higher prices of raw materials, and higher

inflation all have a very significant impact. These three transmission channels are more

obvious in the case of fuel price increases than in the case of electricity fare increases.

With respect to inflationary impact, because MSMEs (especially MSEs) serve mainly

low-income market segments, higher inflation can be a serious problem for these

enterprises.

This study only focuses on selected groups of sectors and industries and only in

selected regions which are all in Java. So, as the implication of this, the findings

presented in this study may not tell the true story or not give a comprehensive picture

about the impact of energy price subsidy policy reform on MSMEs in Indonesia, as
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
138
generally expected that the type of energy and the intensity of energy consumption (or

the share of energy cost in total production cost) varies by sector or group of industry.

Therefore, It needs a further study on MSMEs in other sectors and also in regions

beyond Java especially in rather isolated many small islands given the fact that local

energy especially fuel prices are usually higher than in, for instance, Jakarta because of

many factors including transportation costs and distribution disruptions, especially in

rather isolated small islands in the eastern part of the country.

From the policy perspective, there are at least four important questions that

need first to be answered before the government makes the decision to reduce energy

price subsidy. First, when or in what economic condition the cut of energy price subsidy

is visible (which will result in minimum cost for businesses, especially MSMEs)? Second,

how much the subsidy should be cut each time? Third, what kind of compensation

measures or impact mitigation supports for MSMEs? Fourth, in what sectors MSMEs

should be given the first priority for the compensation measures or impact mitigation

supports? Besides these questions, indirect effects of subsidy cut on MSMEs should also

be taken into consideration, and they should be estimated before make the decision to

reduce subsidy.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the financial support of the Global Subsidies Initiative

(GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Finally, this

effort could not have been undertaken without the generous support of the Swedish

International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Norwegian Ministry of

Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The views

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
139
expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of these funders and should

not be attributed to them

References

Adam, L. and Lestari, E. (2008), "Ten years of reforms: The impacts of an increase in the price of
oil on welfare", Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 121–139. Retrieved
from http:// dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/39603.

APSN (2008), "50 percent of SMEs in Tangerang collapse following fuel price hikes",Jakarta:
Asia Pacific Solidarity Network, Tempo. Retrieved from http://www.asia-pacific-
solidarity.net/southeastasia/
indonesia/indoleft/2008/tempo_50percentsmescollapse_050608.htm.

B2B (2013), "Bank Indonesia: Inflation could rise to 7.9%", Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Retrieved
from http://berita2bahasa.com/berita/01/1862406-bank-indonesia-inflasi-2013-
diperkirakan-capai-7-9# sthash.gaq 4e6Pp.dpuf.

BI (2013), BI-rate raised by 50 bps to 6.50% (No.15/14/DKom), Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.


Retrieved from http://www.bi.go.id/en/ruang-media/siaran-
pers/Pages/sp_151413_dkom-1.aspx.

BI and PS-IUKMPU (2010), "Struktur Biaya Produksi Usaha Mikro dan Kecil" (Production cost
structure of micro and small enterprises), Research report, Jakarta: Bank Indonesia and
Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies.

Beaton, C., and Lontoh, L. (2010), Lessons learned from Indonesia‘s attempts to reform fossil-fuel
subsidies, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from
https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/lessons_indonesia_fossil_fuel_reform.pdf.

BPS (2010a), Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2010, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

BPS. (2010b), Statistik Industri Besar dan Sedang, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

BPS. (2013), Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2013, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

BPS. (2015), Data Sosial Ekonomi. Laporan Bulanan, Edisi. 57, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Braithwaite, D. Chandra, A., Prasetyaning Diah R. L., P., Indriyanto, A., Lang, K. Lontoh, L.
Siahaan, N., Vis-Dunbar, D., Wattimena, B.A., Widhiantoro, U., and Wooders, P. (2012),
Indonesia’s fuel subsidies: Action plan for reform, Research Report, Geneva/Winnipeg:
Global Subsidies Initiative/ International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved
from https://www.iisd.org/gsi/ sites/default/files/ffs_actionplan_indonesia.pdf.

Casier, L. and Beaton, C. (2015), Fossil-fuel subsidy reform and higher fuel prices in Indonesia:
Impacts and expectations, Geneva/Winnipeg: Global Subsidies Initiative/ International
Institute for Sustainable Development.

Citra Indonesia (2013), "Harga Gas 12kg Naik, UKM Roti Keberatan" (price of 12kg-gas
increases, bread making SMEs objection), February 21. Retrieved from
http://citraindonesia.com/harga-gas-12kg-naik-ukm-roti-keberatan/?lang=en.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
140
Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (2013), "Menaikkan Harga BBM: Menaikkan Angka Kemiskinan" (rising
fuel price: rising poverty). Retrieved from http://hizbut-
tahrir.or.id/2013/06/19/menaikkan-harga-bbm-menaikkan-angka-kemiskinan.

Hoai, D.T.T., and Tran, T.T. (2013). "Fossil-fuel fiscal policies and greenhouse gas emissions in
Vietnam – Phase II: Developing a roadmap for fossil-fuel fiscal policy reform", final draft
report, Hypothetical Impacts of Energy Subsidy Removal on Firms in Vietnam (Component
3), Hanoi: Central Institute for Economic Management.

IMF (2013), Case studies on energy subsidy reform: Lessons and implications, Washington, DC:
The International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from
http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/ 012813a.pdf.

Jamal, M., and Ayarkwa, A. (2014), "Fuel price adjustments and growth of SMEs in the New
Juaben Municipality, Ghana", International Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Research, 2(3): 13–22. Retrieved from
http://www.academia.edu/7986742/FUEL_PRICE_ADJUSTMENTS_AND_
GROWTH_OF_SMES_IN_THE_NEW_JUABEN_MUNICIPALITY_GHANA.

Kompas (2012), "Pengrajin Tahu Tempe Terancam Bangkrut" (soybean makers are threatened
to go bankruptcy), Nusantara, Friday, 30 March, page 21.

Kompas (2014a), "Kenaikan Harga BBM" (the increase of fuel price), Wednesday, 19 November,
page 1.

Kompas (2014b), "Dampak Bahan Bakar. Harga Bahan Kebutuhan Pokok Melonjak" (impact of
fuel, basic needs go up), Nusantara, Thursday, 20 November, page 22.

Ministry of Finance (2014), Budget in Brief APBN 2015, Jakarta. Retrieved from
http://www.kemenkeu. go.id/Publikasi/budget-brief-apbn-2015.

Mishkin, F. (1992), "Is the fisher effect for real? A reexamination of the relationship between
inflation and interest rates", Journal of Monetary Economics, 30(2): 195–215. Retrieved
from http://www.nber. org/papers/w3632.

Purwanto, D. (2013), "Harga BBM Naik, Jumlah Orang Miskin Naik Jadi 30 Juta" (the price of fuel
increased, total poor people raised to 30 million) May 27, Kompas, Jakarta.

Republika Online (2013), "Organda Palu Segera Bahas Kenaikan Tarif Angkot" (Organda Palu is
going to discuss the increase of angkot fee), 18 June. Retrieved from
http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/daerah/13/06/18/mol8bk-organda-palu-
segera-bahas-kenaikan-tarif-angkot.

Rizal, M. (2007), "Analisis Dampak Kenaikan Harga Bahan Bakar Minyak (BBM) Terhadap
Tingkat Inflasi dan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Sumatera Utara (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan
Kecil dan Menengah)" (Analysis of the impact of the increase in fuel (BBM) price on
inflation rate and poverty in the province of North Sumatra (empirical study on small and
medium enterprises)), Jakarta: Lembaga Riset Publik. Retrieved from
http://www.larispa.or.id/publikasi/artikel/138-penelitian-analisis-dampak-kenaikan-
harga-bahan-bakar-minyak-bbm-tingkat-inflasi-dan-kemiskinan-dipropinsi-sumatera-
utara-studi-empiris-pada-perusahaan-kecil-dan-menengah-.html.

Sinaga, P. (2013), "Harga BBM dan UKM" [BBM price and SMEs], Kolom Gagasan, Koran Jakara.
Retrieved from http://m.koran-jakarta.com/index.php?id=122522&mode_beritadetail=1.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
141
Tambunan, Tulus, T.H (2008a), "Trade liberalization effects on the development of small and
medium-sized enterprises in Indonesia: A case study", Asia-Pacific Development Journal,
15(2): 35-59.

Tambunan, Tulus, T.H (2008b), "Development of rural manufacturing SME clusters in a


developing country: The Indonesian case". Journal of Rural Development, 31(2): 123-146.

Tambunan, Tulus,T.H (2009a), SME in Asian developing countries, London: Palgrave Macmillan
Publisher.

Tambunan, Tulus, T.H (2009b), Development of SMEs in ASEAN countries, New Delhi:
Readworthy Publications, Ltd.

Tambunan, Tulus, T.H (2013), "Fossil-fuel subsidy reform and small and medium-sized
enterprises (SMEs): The impacts and possible responses", Briefing Note, Geneva/Winnipeg:
Global Subsidies Initiative, International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved
from https://www.iisd.org/ publications/fossil-fuel-subsidy-reform-and-small-and-
medium-sized-enterprises-smes-impacts-and.

Tambunan, Tulus, T.H (2014), "Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A key group to
consider for the welfare impacts of fossil-fuel subsidy reform", Part Two: Guest Analysis,
Indonesia Energy Subsidy Review, A Biannual Survey of Energy Subsidy Policies, 1(1): 10-15,
March, Geneva/Winnipeg: Global Subsidies Initiative, International Institute for
Sustainable Development.

Tempo Online (2014), "Harga Elpiji Naik Restoran Naikkan Harga" (price of LPG increased,
restaurants raised their prices). Retrieved from
http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2014/09/12/090606391/Harga-Elpiji-Naik-Restoran-
Naikkan-Harga.

Tempo Online (2015), "Konsumen Elpiji 12 Kg Diprediksi Beralih ke Gas Melon" (LPG
consumers are expected to shift to melon gas). Retrieved from
http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2015/01/05/ 090632895/Konsumen-Elpiji-12-Kg-
Diprediksi-Beralih-ke-Gas-Melon.

UNDP (2014), Green growth and fossil fuel fiscal policies in Viet Nam, Hanoi: the United Nations
Development Programme. Retrieved from
http://www.vn.undp.org/content/vietnam/en/home/ library/
environment_climate/green_growth_and_fossil_fuel_fiscal_policies_in_viet_nam.html.

USAID (2008), Energy and small and medium enterprises, Washington, DC: United States Agency
for International Development. Retrieved from
http://www.energyandsecurity.com/images/3._Small_ and_Medium_Enterprise.pdf.

Widodo, T., Sahadewo, G.A., Setiastuti, S.U., and Chaerriyah, M. (2012), "Cambodia’s electricity
sector in the context of regional electricity market integration", in Wu, Y., X. Shi and F.
Kimura (eds.), "Energy market Integration in East Asia: theories, electricity sector and
subsidies", ERIA Research Project Report 2011-17. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for
ASEAN and East Asia.

World Bank (2014), Indonesia Economic Quarterly: Delivering Change, Washington, D.C.: World
Bank. Retrieved from
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/12/08/Indonesia-economic-
quarterly-december-.
International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 114 - 142
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
142
About the Authors

Ailyn S. Lau is a researcher specializing in small and medium enterprises (SMEs), trade
policy, and competitiveness. She graduated magna cum laude from Ateneo de Manila
University in 2012 with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics (Honors Program). As a
research associate for the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) Policy Center, she co-
managed the Enterprise Performance in Asia project that supported evidence-based
research on SMEs in middle-income Asian countries. At the AIM Policy Center, she also co-
authored several papers with topics ranging from technology spillovers from trade and
investment to crisis resilience of SMEs and a book entitled The Asian Noodle Bowl: Free
Trade and Economic Integration in the Post-Crisis Era. She is currently studying in
University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia to obtain a Masters of Commerce (major in
Applied Finance and Accounting).

Elżbieta Klamut is currently deputy director of Institute of Economics, University of Social


Sciences in Poland and manager of direction Finances and Accounting, the department
head of Accounting as well as the coordinator of the postgraduate studies associated with
accounting, with internal audit, compliance in the organization and of the risk management
in the same university. Scientific interests connected with the outsourcing of services
financially - of accountants, with accounting of agricultural farm, managerial accounting,
financial management in an small economic entities. The author of over 50 scientific
publications and participant in over 10 national and international.

Fabiola Ponce Durán hold a PhD in Administrative Sciences. Her research areas of
interest are management and business strategy with the emphasis on organizational
behavior, government and organizations. She teaches at the Autonomous University of
Sinaloa, Mexico and TecMilenio University System Tecnológico de Monterrey. She has just
completed her study on the system of structural equations in Venezuela.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 144 - 146
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
143
Jamil Paolo S. Francisco is an Associate Professor of Economics at the Asian Institute of
Management (AIM), and the Executive Director of the AIM Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center
for Competitiveness. A former lecturer for the Ateneo de Manila University Economics
Department, Prof. Francisco is currently involved in a number of research projects on
ASEAN economic integration. He has worked on a broad range of topics including
household adaptations to disasters, post-disaster recovery, among others. He has also led
several research projects under the East Asian Development Network (EADN) and the
International Development Research Centre’s (IDRC) Economy and Environment Program
for South East Asia (EEPSEA). Dr. Francisco obtained his Ph.D and Master’s degree in
Economics from the Ateneo de Manila University.

Makary Piasecki graduated from Clark University. Currently, he is a PhD student at the
Department of Management, University of Lodz, focusing on technology transfer issues and
relation between public and private sector. Since 2015 he has been working at the Institute
of Biopolymers and Chemical Fibres, and he has also been involved with the Institute of
Research and Industrial Cooperation of Terrassa.

Marcela Rebeca Contreras Loera is a full time professor in Universidad de Occidente. She
holds a PhD in Organizational Studies and a postdoctoral title in Social Sciences. She is a
member of the National Research System Level 1; honorary member of the State Research
System of Sinaloa; preferred profile recognition of Prodep; leader of the consolidated
analysis and development academic body. She is a core member of the Doctorate in
Management and Tourism Management (PNPC-CONACYT). Member of the National
Research Network Conacyt Civil Society and Quality Democracy. She is also part of the
National Research Network Conacyt Poverty and Urban Development. She has published
books, book chapters, and articles in indexed journals. She is an evaluator of Conacyt,
Prodep, PROFOCIE and several universities.

Patta Hindi Asis hold M.A in Sociology at Gadjah Mada University. He is a lecturer and
researcher in the Faculty of Social and Political Science Faculty in University of
Muhammadiyah in Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. His research focus areas are in
community development, rural sociology and sociology of knowledge. Currently, he is going
to conduct more studies on the subject of livelihood strategy of survivor of Indonesian
Communist Party (PKI) in Nanga-nanga village in Kendari. His personal blog:
lumbungpadi@blogspot.com.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 144 - 146
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
144
Ririn Syahriani got her M.Ed from Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta with major
educational management as her major study and she has been accepted in University of
Bristol, UK to pursuit her doctoral study in 2016. She is an English lecturer in English
Department of Muhammadiyah University of Kendari. Her expertise is especially in
teaching English as foreign learner; however, leadership and community development has
also been her concern, especially when it comes to educate and to empower people. Her
focus project is to integrate education, leadership and society empowerment.

Ronald U. Mendoza, PhD is the incoming Dean of the Ateneo School of Government (June
2016). Previously, he served as Associate Professor of Economics at the Asian Institute of
Management, and Executive Director of the AIM Policy Center, a think tank engaged in
research on governance, competition policy and international development. Prior to AIM,
he was a senior economist with the United Nations, where he worked on international
development policy for almost a decade. Mendoza obtained his BA in Economics (Honors
Program) from the Ateneo de Manila University, his MPA in International Development
from Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and his MA and PhD in Economics from
Fordham University. Mendoza was named Young Global Leader by the World Economic
Forum in 2014, and Outstanding Young Scientist by the National Academy of Science and
Technology in 2013.

Tulus T.H. Tambunan, graduated and received PhD in economics from the Erasmus
University in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, is a lecturer in the Faculty of Economics,
University of Trisakti in Jakarta (Indonesia). Currently he is also the head and the main
researcher of the Center for Industry, Small and Medium Enterprises, and Business
Competition Studies in the same university. Since 1995 he has been the country researcher
representing Indonesia for the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Geneva, which publishes,
annually, The Global Competitiveness Report. He has done many studies on various issues
related to micro, small and medium enterprises, economic crises, regional trade, and
inclusive development.

International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability,Vol.1, No.3 (March 2016), pp 144 - 146
© 2015-2016 by Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, USAKTI
ISSN:2442-9368 electronic
145

You might also like