0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 206 views104 pagesAnnotations All Lessons
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
LESSON - 1
ADIVCE TO A YOUNG MAN INTERESTED
IN GOING To LAW
BY
FELIX FRANKFURTER
See
Annotations
| 1. Annotate the following
if | were you, | would forget all about any technical prepara-
tion for the law. . (May, 2012)
This line is taken from the letter, written by Felix
Frankfurter to Master [Link] Claussan, Jr. In the lesson
“Advice to a young man interested in going to the law”. In
this letter, the author advises the young man to forget all
about any technical preparation for studying law. He stresses
the point that a lawyer should forget all about his future
career and he must cultivate his imaginative faculties by
reading poetry, seeing paintings and listening to music, in
addition to studying law. Hence the author makes it clear
that a prospective lawyer-should prepare himself for a truly
liberal education.
Scanned with anScanner4
2.
English -|
(May, 2011)
Anno! /
The best way to prepare for the law is to come to the study
son.
tate the following
of law as well-read pe!
r to the prospective lawyer Master [Link]
In his lette! f
asks him to come
Claussan .Jr, the author Felix Frankfurte
to study law as a person with a thorough knowledge of us-
age of English. He advises him to study poetry and litera-
ture of English well before actually becoming a lawyer. He
also asks him to be compassionate towards others and em-
pathies with clients when he practises law.
Annotate the following
No less important for a lawyer is the cultivation of the imagi-
native faculties by reading poetry, seeing great paintings in
the original or in the easily available reproductions, and lis-
tening to great music.
This is taken from the letter written by Felix Frankfurter
to Master [Link] Claussan, Jr. The author, in this letter,
asks this student of law, to cultivate imaginative faculties by
reading Not just law alone but also by reading poems, see-
ing paintings and listening to music. So, he advises the
Prospective lawyers to fill their minds with imaginative ideas
to broaden their experiences.
Scanned ith anScannerLesson-1
5
980 A
4.
Annotate the following
Stock your mind with the deposit of much good reading,
and wider and deeper your feelings by experiencing vicari-
ously as much as possible the wonderful mysteries of the
universe, and forget all about your future career.
(Nov, 2011)
In his letter to Paul Claussan .Jr, Felix Frankfurter ad-
vises the prospective lawyer to deepen his feelings by stock-
ing his mind with much reading of literature of English. He
also wants him to develop good feelings by watchings indi-
rectly the good feelings of others. Actually vicarious feel-
ings, empathizes with the experiences of others. Thus a
lawyer should have fellow feelings, and should be kind-
hearted.
OO IK
‘Seannad ith CamcannerAnnotations 2nd Lesson
Annotate the following
“For the ability of the lawyer to confuse others by the use of
words has long been the subject of proverbs”.
This is taken from the lesson ‘The language of the law’
by Urban A. Lavery. The author explains that the usage of
words by the lawyer to argue a legal points is the subject of16
English +1
many people. The words used by lawyers confuse the lay,
men. The author adds that this is due to the fact that they
have been trained SO, and also due to the work they are
called upon to do. Even if the lawyers confuse others by
their words, the author says, they are the last resource of
the common man in case of legal remedy.
Annotate the following
“Why is it that the lawyer, who thinks and speaks King’s
English better than his fellows, falls below them when he
writes it?
This is taken from “The language of the law” by Urban
A. Lavery. The author says that most of the lawy
good English, but when they write, their Englis!
Their writings confuse the ordinary man. They ai
for Prolixity and overuse of words. Lawyers writi
the very Purpose of conveying the message to tl
ers speak
h is poor,
Ings defeat
he people.
Annotate the following
Why may not this be the Skull of a lawyer? Where now be
his quiddities, his quillets, his ca,
ses, his tenures, and his
tricks?
‘Seannad th CamcannerLesson - 2 17
quotation from Hamlet and these words of Shakespeare
explains the language used by lawyers. The lawyers, even
in the period of Shakespeare, were able to express his cases
intelligently. They were good in speaking good English even
in the age of Shakespeare, but poor in writing.
4, Annotate the following
For it is an ancient charge that the lawyer, as compared to
other writers, is prolix and muddy in his literary style and is
unduly given to the overuse of words.
This is taken from the lesson ‘The language of the law’.
The author Urban A. Lavery says that people from every
walks of life complain that the lawyers’ writings are confus-
ing and they use more words even to explain a simple thing.
Their language is rather confusing and it is difficult to read.
The lawyers lose their mastery of words when they write
and their judicial opinions are familiar for prolixity.
5. Annotate the following
Moreover, he who undertakes the task is likely to be marked
down as an egoist for his pains; he runs the risk of being
called a pedantic preacher.
The author, Urban A. Lavery, in his paper titled ‘The
language of the law’, explains that the person who under-
takes the task of teaching writing is considered as an ego-
ist. The job of teaching writing, especially writing legal docu-
‘Seannad ith CamcannerEnglish . |
aL
t and boring. The person may be consig, —
nts, is difficul
= as a pedantic preacher. So, the author stresses the
° see
fact that teaching any person of law writing legal documents
is not an easy task.
Annotate the following
There are books on writing poetry, there are books on writ.
ing prose, there are books on writing scientific English, on t
writing orations, on writing plays, on writing every kind of
English except (so far as | know) on writing legal English.
The author, Urban A. Lavery, in his paper “The language
of the law” says that the lawyers are not well-versed in writ-
ing legal documents that are easy to read. In explaining his
Points by stressing the need for learning to write good legal
documents. For teaching or leaming good legal documents,
that are easy to read, there is not even a single book for a
Teady reference. The author asks the lawyers to read good
grammar books of English before writing a legal document.
‘Thus he stresses the need for a good book
on writing legal
English.
Annotate the following
And thus, between plain, rude and curious, | stand abashed.
(May, 2000)
, ome 'S taken from the lesson ‘The language of the law’
y Urban A. Lavery. Here, he Quotes the words of William
Scanned with anScannerLesson - 2 19
Caxton. Caxton felt that, even in those days, the communi-
cation between people of reputation was not clear and easy
to understand. He was ashamed of the fact that not even
great clerks did not write for an easy understanding. Thus
the people who drafted laws in those days did not justify
their job of writing legal documents.
8. Annotate the following
“With proviso and additions and many times of a sudden
penned or corrected by men of none or very little judgment
in the law”.
This is taken from the lesson written by Urban [Link].
The author explains the reason for the prolixity in the writ-
ings of lawyers. The people who draft laws write the laws
but it is corrected by the people who know nothing about
law. So, the additions and deletions and the afterthought
corrections while drafting laws, make them difficult to read.
9. Annotate the following
This matter of drafting laws is really a large part of our sub-
ject and it may well concern our thoughts.
In his paper ‘The language of the law’ Urban [Link]
explains that-the writings of lawyers are not easily under-
stood. He adds that this is due to the fact the drafting law
occupies major portion of writings of lawyers. So, they use
guarded words and write cautiously, Hence their style of
Scanned with anScannet10.
11.
Les:
writing and form of words differ from the writings of othe —
people. The form and style of our written laws confuse thy
laymen.
12.
Annotate the following
Yet, Strangely enough, itis in this matter of writing laws tha
ihe lawyer offen reaches and surpasses the limits of human
In the lesson ‘The language of the law’ Urban [Link]
Points out the defects in the style of writings. Lawyers con.
fuse other people by writing long-winded and complex sen.
tences. The laymen who read these sentences are not able
to understand them. The author Says that the lawyer often
reaches the limit of human Capacity of understanding the
laws drafted by some eminent lawyers. -
13
Annotate the following
For laws, like the Poor, are not always with us, they are
above us and around us and almost reach within us.
This line is taken from the lesson ‘The language of the
law’, by Urban A. Lavery. Lawyers are famous for writing
long sentences without a full stop. They use as many words
8 possible to draft a law and the use of many words con
fuses us. He compared it with the poor man who is not with
Us, but above us and around us. The poor is everywhere
‘Seannad ith CamcannerLesson - 2
12.
13.
21
and can not be understood. Hence the laws are not clear to
read and so the laymen are not able to follow them.
Annotate the following
It is notorious that English writers seldom look into a gram-
mar or composition book.
This sentence is taken from the lesson ‘The language
of the law’ by Urban A. Lavery. The author says that law-
yers often consult their law books. But they never consult a
good grammar book or a composition. He advised them to
consult a good grammar book before drafting laws or legal
documents. Since they consult only the law books written
many years ago, their style of writing and the form of words
are not clear to the ordinary people.
Annotate the following
Both words seem to have been in fairly common use three
hundred years ago.
In his paper ‘The language of the law’, the author Ur-
ban A. Lavery quotes from the Shakespeare drama ‘Hamelt'.
From this quotation he has taken two words ‘quiddity’ and
‘quillet’, and. says that these two words have been in use
. three hundred years ago. ‘Quiddity’ explains the nicety of
lawyers in arguing his case, and ‘quibble’ says about their
argument about something unimportant. Shakespeare used
Scanned with anScannet24
49,
20.
English -,
The author Urban A. Lavery in his paper on ‘The oa
guage of the law’ quotes professor a nee This
professor discussed the subject of prolixity in detail. He
advised the lawyers not to quote the ten commandments
before the audience in the court of law. He added that the
lawyers should not bore the audience with what they knew
already.
Annotate the following
Another chief defect in the writing of lawyers is the fact that
they use circumlocution rather than, blunt-speech.
This line is taken from ‘The language of the law’ by Ur.
banA. Lavery. The author, while pointing out the defects in
the writing of lawyers, says that lawyers write their legal
documents using a roundabout way. They never use a
straight approach to explain a legal point using minimum
number of words. The use of circumlocution confuses the
reader, and this leads to misunderstanding. So, circumlo-
Cution is one of the chief defects in the writings of lawyers.
Annotate the following
Like charity, they cover a multitude of sins; and hence find
frequent use.
The author Urban A, Lavery in his Paper
‘The language
Of the law’ explains the reason for the con
fusion in under
Scanned with anScannetLesson - 2 25
standing the writings of lawyers. The words ‘case’, ‘instance’
or ‘character’ finds frequent use in the writings of the law-
yers. He says that, like charity these words cover a multi-
tude of sins and so they find frequent use. Hence the rep-
etition of these words in the legal documents confuses the
reader and so the readers are not able to understand them.
tO OK IK
‘Seannad ith Camcanneroo YY OUSITIS,
Annotations 3rd lesson
Annotate the followingLesson - 3 33
coughed nervously, but soon he understood the stillness of
the court and stopped coughing. The author humorously
noted that the stillness of the surroundings infected the pris-
oner.
2. Annotate the following
‘Here is Justitia, here is policia, here is Militia - a regular
boarding school of high-born young ladies’.
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The court proceedings were witnessed by the po-
lice, military people and judges. Among the audience were
young ladies who were from the high-born society. This
court was regularly visited by the rural board, the liquor board
and the military board for the sessional meetings. This cir-
cuit court was attended by many people and even with these
too many people the court proceedings were dull and mo-
notonous.
3: Annotate the following
The programme of the day was promptly entered upon, with
noticeable haste. The cases came on one after another
and ended quickly like a church service without a choir.
(June, 2003 & Nov. 2002)
These lines are taken from the lesson “In ihe Court” by
Anton Chekov. The author explains the court proceedings
by telling the fact that the cases are taken one after another
‘Seannadith CamscannertC ——
quickly like a chur
eMltahy 4
) gorvice, without any cholt. Ho alyg
ircuil court by saying that
able to form a complaty
ch
explains the happenings in this cl
the audience sitting thy
picture of the cases argu
by like a river in flood.
ere are Nol
ed there. SO, he says that all the
cases are all racing
Annotate the following
2009
“Bring in the prisoner”. (Juno, 2009)
“In the Court” by Anton
ordered the court to
This is taken from the lesson
Chekov. The president of the court
bring the prisoner, Nikolay Harlamov. The prisoner was a
peasant who was charged with the murder of his wife. Ex-
actly at 2 O'clock the presiding judge announced that this
case of Nikolay Harlamov would be heard.
Annotate the following
He was a tall, thick set peasant of about fifty five completely
. (May, 2004)
Nn Chekov, while describing the court Proceedings of
gs of
a circuit court in Russi in Ci
' Issia, explains t i a
— 7 he hearing of a case oi
‘Inth :
Was tall and about fi le court’. The man, Nikolay Harlamov
the murder of hi ify-five Year old. He was charged wi
for the hearin Swife. The police brought ti ged with
9 of his case, at 2 O'clock on th im to the cour
n that day.
‘Seannad th CamscannerLesson - 3
35
Lesson
6.
Annotate the following
“Are you putting up at Demyanav's, Matvey Petrovitch"?
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The author described the court proceedings of a
circuit court in Russia. The president of the court asked the
judge, Matvey Petrovitch whether he was putting up at
Demyanav’s. The judge answered that he was putting up at
Demyanav's.
Annotate the following
The charge of murder hung over him.
(June, 2002, may 2011)
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The prisoner Nikolay Harlamov was brought to the
court for hearing his case. The author brought out the court
proceedings by saying that, though he was charged with
murder, nobody pitied him, for his extraordinary fate. Thus
the people and the judge took this case as an ordinary one.
Annotate the following
The dingy windows and walls, the voice of the Secretary,
the attitude of the prosecutor were all saturated with official
indifference and produced an atmosphere of frigidity.
(May, 2007)
These line are taken from the lesson “In the Court” by
Scanned with anScannet—_—— |
English - |
3B
Anton Chekov. The author described the ee of the |
court officials and explained the court proceedings. The
dingy windows and walls, the voice of the coum the
attitude of the prosecutor were all full of official area
and indifference. The attitude of the official showed that the
murderer was the official property.
Annotate the following
The peasant, reassured, did not understand that a men
here were as accustomed to the dramas and tragedies of
life and were as blunted by the sight of the them as hospital
attendants are at the sight of death and that the whole hor-
rorand hopelessness of his position lay just in this mechani-
cal indifference.
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The peasant who was charged with murder did
not understand the men in the court. These men, the au-
thor said were all accustomed to the happenings in the court.
They were all as blunt as the hospital attendants were at
the sight of death. He added further that the prisoner's hor-
ror and the hopelessness were all in the mechanical indif-
ference of the officials.
Annotate the following
‘No, sir’, answered the pri
" © prisoner, getting up and holding hi
gown over his chest. ° ‘arare
‘Seannad ith CamcannerLesson - 3 37
This line is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The court official produced a peasant in the court
and charged him with murder of his wife. The president of
the circuit court asked this prisoner whether he killed his
wife and whether he wanted to plead guilty. The prisoner
said that he did not want to plead guilty.
11. Annotate the following
“| was frightened ....... | was afraid | might be judged guilty
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The judge asked the prisoner what he was doing during
those three days. The prisoner answered that he was fright-
ened and so he hid himself wandering in the field for three
days. He added also that he had been afraid that he might
have been judged guilty.
12. Annotate the following
“Prisoner’, said the president, addressing Harlamov, “Can-
not you explain to the court where you were during the three
days following the murder?”
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
Here, the author, described a court hearing of the case of
the prisoner Nikolay Harlamov. The Prisoner was charged
with the murder of his wife. During the interrogation the
‘Seannad ith Camcanner13.
14.
15.
her he could explain to the court
ent asked him whet
days following the murder
presid
hree
what he was doing the t
Annotate the following
| was wandering about the fields... Neither eating nor
drinking (Nov, 2011)
rt” by Anton
he lesson “In the Cou
described a court scene.
Nikolay Harlamov,
This is taken from t
Chekov. In this lesson the author
In the hearing of the case of the prisoner,
the president of the court asked him w!
after the murder. He said that he was wandering about the
fields and that he did not eat or drink during those three
hat he was doing
days.
Annotate the following
“Why did you hide yourself, if it was not you that committed
the murder?”
This question was asked by the president of the court to
the prisoner Nikolay Harlamoy, in the lesson “In the Court” by
Anton Chekov. The prisoner, Nikolay Harlamov was charged
with murder of his wife. He was produced before the judge
and the judge asked him that if he had not committed the
murder why he had hidden himself after the murder.
Annotate the following
"Next ti
lext time | shall probably put up there too. It is really im-
‘Seannad ith CamcannerLesson - 3 39
16.
17.
possible to put up at Tipyakov's! There’s noise and uproar
all night! Knocking, loughing, children crying ... It's impos-
sible!”
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The president of the court told the judge next to
him that he would probably could not put up the noise and
uproar all night. He also added that it was really impossible
to put up at Tipyakov's.
Annotate the following
His youthful face expressed nothing but the frigid, immov-
able boredom which is commonly seen on the face of school
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The author described a court scene in this lesson.
The assistant prosecutor was handsome and young, and
his youthful face expressed nothing. The author added that
this man was like a school boy who was bored with the
school. He never expressed any excitement in his speech.
Thus the court proceedings were dull and nobody in the
court took interest in the proceedings of the court.
Annotate the following
The last to be examined was the district doctor who had
Made a post-mortem on the old woman.
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
‘Seannad ith Camscanner40
18.
19.
in this lesson. The peas-
the accused and the charge was
e hearing the judge asked the
He was the last
The author described a court scene
ant Nikolay Harlamov was
the murder of his wife. Dur
court officials to examine th
man in this hearing. This doctor made the
was murdered three days before.
ing thi
e district doctor.
postmortem on the
‘old woman who
Annotate the following
Everyone wears 2 short jacket nowadays, why has he had
his made long? Why long and not short?
This is from the lesson “In the Court’ by Anton Chekovy,
The author described the court proceedings of a rural court,
In this court proceedings he described the hearing of the case
of Nikolay Harlamov. The president of the court examined
the district doctor who made the post-mortem on the old
woman. The old woman was the wife of the prisoner Nikolay
Harmalov. The president of the court took interest in the
oe of the doctor and thought why the doctor wore a lon
jacket instead of short one. "
Annotate the following
“Mihaie Viadimirovitch”. sai
ing dow pal " Said the assistant prosecutor bent
in to th i 1, °
le president's ear, “amazingly slovenly the wa)
that Koreisky cond Ir he priso
y lucted the investigatio| i :
brother was not examined .
‘Seannad ith Camcanner41
Lesson - 3
20.
21.
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
Here the author narrated a‘court trial of the prisoner Nikolay
Harlamov. The prisoner was charged with the murder of his
wife. During the hearing the assistant prosecutor whispered
to the president's ear and said that Koreisky did not con-
duct the investigation properly and he did not examine the
prisoner's brother and village elder. So, the president said
that the trial was not proper.
Annotate the following
“Really? You wouldn't guess it from his appearance...”
In the narration of the court proceedings of a rural court,
the author Anton Chekov described the hearing of the case
of Nikolay Harlamov. The assistant prosecutor said to the
president that in the audience a wealthy man was sitting
and added that man had a property of fifty thousand. The
president wondered that he did not guess it from his
appearance.
Annotate the following
The president raised his eyes to the doctor. “So you con-
sider that death was instantaneous?”
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The author narrated the hearing of the. case of Nikolay
Harlamov. The doctor was the last witness of this case. He
made the post-mortem on the woman who was murdered.
Scanned ith anScannet22.
23.
"aman.
The president asked the doctor whether the death y,
mean ny
stantaneous.
Annotate the following
“Have you any question to ask?" (May, 2008)
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The author while describing a court proceeding narrated
the case of Nikolay Harlamov. He was charged with the
murder of his wife. During the hearing the doctor who made
the post-mortem on the woman was examined. After the
examination, the president asked the defense lawyer
whether he had any question to ask the doctor.
Annotate the following
“Tell me, doctor, can you from the dimensions
.... as to the mental condition of the
of the wound
form any theory as to ...
criminal?”
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton
Chekov. The author narrated the court proceedings ofa
rural court and the case was the murder of a woman by her
husband Nikolay Harlamov. The last witness of this hear-
ing of this case was the doctor who made the post-mortem
on the woman. The defense lawyer asked the doctor
whether he could tell the mental condition of the murderer
from the dimensions of the wound.
‘Scanned ith CamcannerLesson - 3 43
{ 24. Annotate the following
“Three days before my old woman's death Penkov bled his
horse”.
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
In his narration of the proceedings of the rural court the
author narrated the hearing of the case of Nikolay Harlamov.
He was charged with the murder of his wife. In the exami-
nation-of the material evidence, the prosecutor questioned
him about the blood stain in his coat. He explained that the
blood stain was due to the bleeding of his horse three days
before the murder. He was present when Penkov, the man
who bled his horse and so the stain was due to the bleeding
of his horse.
Annotate the following
And your neighbor Ivan Timofeyitch, with whom you mended
a sledge, has given evidence that it is your axe. “I can’t say
that, but | swear before God ....”
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The author narrated a court scene in this piece of writing,
and he described the case of Nikolay Harlamov. The case
of the murder of his wife. During the material evidence of
this case the prisoner declared that the axe used for killing
the woman was not his axe. But the prosecutor questioned
that the prisoner neighbor Ivan Timofeyitch said that he had
™mended his axe. The prisoner said that he could not say
‘Seannad ith Camcannera4
a bogie 1
aout that but he & ould swear before Gad that
eal amen vary rie
his.
26. Annotate the following '
“if you don't believe me, be pleased to ask my son Probar
Proshka what did you do wilh the axe ?"
9 Court” by ANION & shekov,
ceedings nariated
He was Ae
This is from the Josson “In th
The author while presenting a court pre
the hearing of the case of Nikolay Harlamov.
cused of murdering his wifo with his
rt, the proseculo
Tho prisoner proter
5 AXO During the mate
rial evidence in the coul 1, showed the blood
stained axe to the prisoner. stad that
was not his axe. He said that if the
lieve him, he could be pleased to ask hi
name. The prisoner turned towards the guare
nat he had done with the axe.
prosoautar did not bo.
on Prohar by
{and asked
him wl
27. Annotate the following
ent! Everyone seemed to winco and
It was a painful mom
(Nov, 2010)
as it were shrink together.
This is taken from the lesson “In the Court" by Anton
Chekov. The author narrated the hearing of the case of
Nikolay Harlamov. He was accused of murdering his wife
The material evidences were the last of this hearing. The
prosecutor showed the prisoner an axe that was used for
the is
murder, The prisoner did not accept the axe as his
‘Seannad th CamscannerLesson -3 45
28.
29.
Then he asked the soldier who was standing as a guard in
the court what he had done with the axe. The audience in
the court felt a painful moment and all of them winced be-
cause of this pain.
Annotate the following
“prisoner, conversation with the guards is forbidden ....... ”
the president made haste to say. (Nov., 2000)
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The author narrated the hearing of the case of Nikolay
Harlamov. He was charged with the murder of his wife.
During the material evidence, the prosecutor showed an
axe to the prisoner but the prisoner did not accept the axe
as his. Then the prisoner turned towards the soldier who
was standing there and asked him what he had done with
the axe. Now the president said that the prisoner was not
allowed to talk with the guards.
Annotate the following
All raised their head and, trying to look as though nothing
had happened, went on with their work.
This is from the lesson “In the Court” by Anton Chekov.
The author narrated the proceedings of the court and he
showed the court scene of a case of Nikolay Harlamov.
Harlamov was accused of murdering his wife. During the
Scanned with anScanneree |
English -!
material evidences Harlamov, the prisoner asked the sol- |
g in the court as his guard what he had !
‘ected to that the pris-
ident obj
Ik to the guards. Then the offi-
Finally all the officials and the
that they had hung before. The
h the work as if nothing had
|
dier who was standin:
done with the axe- The presi
oner was not allowed to tal
cials changed the guard.
ir heads
audience raised theii
court officials proceeded witl
happened.
Fok IItions In society. Much of the knowledge gained in the legal
relation from the day-to-day experience of the bar 9,
the le hould include the experiences of the prac
tising lawyers in thoir curriculum.
Ath lesson
Annotations
Annotate the following
These changes roflect not moroly growth and development
in our law and society, but also, | boliove, a marked change
in the nature of the work done by lawyors, or al loast by
many lawyers.
This is from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a chang-
ing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The author in this paper
noted the changes made in the legal education of America.
He said that the program of instruction of the law schools
had been changed materially today. These changes, he
believed that, were reflected in the nature of the work done
by lawyers.
Annotate the following
One cannot become a great scholar by accumulating notes
Even more than in the older courses, what must be sought
is understanding of process and social and economic forces
and factors rather than specific content - although the con-
tent can by no means be ignored.
‘Seannadith Camcanner—
Enguan 1
ating lawyers for
‘are from the lesson “Educ:
The author
N. Griswold
These lines
rs to concentrate more
a changing world” by Erwin
emphasised the need of the lawye!
on the understanding of legal process
nomic forces and factors, than the specific content of the
at nobody could become
dies. He also cautioned th
g notes alone and so every.
and social and eco.
legal stu
a great scholar by accumiatin,
ntrate on the process and social and eco,
body should conce
nomic forces and factors for teaching a law course. He
e the content of legay
also stressed that we should not ignor
studies.
Annotate the following
jools have been trying (0 learn
3.
For a generation the law sch
how to teach these subjects.
This is taken from the lesson “Educating lawyers: fora
changing world” by Erwin N. Griswold The author Says
that the law schools have been trying to learn how to teach
public law, labour law, administrative law, etc. He explains
that the law schools have 4 good background for this prob-
lem in the method of teaching these subjects.
4. Annotate the following
In many ways the newer subjects are more demanding of
Law teachers. (Dec, 2001)
_ Inhis speech on “Educating lawyers for a changi"9
‘Scanned ith Camscanner53
;
1 Erwin N. Griswold makes it clear that the
world” the autho!
‘ects taught in the law school demand much effort
new subj
rs must devote time
m the law teachers. The law teache
frot
5 to their students in the
and energy in teaching new subject:
law schools.
Annotate the following
We must always keep working at the task of improving our
teaching job.
In his speech on “Educating lawyers for a changing
world” the speaker Erwin N. Griswold says that the law
schools are lagging in meeting some of the problems in
teaching new subjects. He adds that we must always keep
working at the task of improving our methodology in teach-
ing laws in the law schools.
Annotate the following
Our knowledge of the facts underlying most problems is
sketchy in the extreme or non-existent. (Nov., 2007)
This is from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a chang-
ing world” the author Erwin N. Griswold says that our knowl-
edge of the facts that are underlying most problems of legal
relations is incomplete and in some areas the knowledge is
nonexistant.
‘Seannadith Camscanner54
Annotate the following
Indeed, much of the knowledge to be gained lies in the day.
to-day experience of the Bar. (June, 2002)
This is taken from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a
changing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The author explains
that the knowledge gained in the legal relationship is actu-
ally from the day-to-day experience of the lawyers who are
practising law. This knowledge must be made use of in
teaching these subjects in the law schools.
Annotate the following
But practising lawyers have their own problem too. They
have their living to make.
These two lines are taken from the lesson “Educating
lawyers for a changing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The
author says that the practising lawyers gain more know
edge about legal relations than the law teachers. He ad-
vises the practising lawyers to devote time to improve the
teaching of these subjects. But he adds that they have ther
living to make. They can concentrate only on their clients
Annotate the following
Within the legal profession, it is, | believe, peculiarly thé
opportunity of the law schools to meet this need.
This is from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a chang
‘Seannad th CamcannerLesson -4 55
ing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The author says that the
law schools should produce research works on legal rela-
tionship. In addition to this they must act as effective teach-
ing agencies. The author adds that this is possible within
the legal profession and the law schools would meet this
need.
Annotate the following
That is an appropriate question, but | think it can be readily
answered.
This is from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a chang-
ing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The author informs that
law professors have been turning out good books and ar-
ticles. He adds further by asking what the need was much
more research works when we have already so much. Then
he answers that the need of hour is the legal research works
of different sorts.
Annotate the following
We have become accustomed to our scientific schools and
our medical schools being great centers of research. In
many of these schools, teaching as such has become a
secondary activity. (Nov., 2004)
This is from the lesson “Educating lawyers for a chang-
ing world” by Erwin N. Griswold. The author explains to the
readers that we, people are accustomed to the research
‘Seannad vith Camscanner58
16.
17.
Engish-!
Annotate the following
while Hertzian waves were
The telephone was in daily use
Maxwell's book. (Dec., 2006)
sson “Educating lawyers for a changing
Id. The author advises that it may
not be possible to find final answers to all questions in human
relations. But, he adds, the final results are not necessary to
progress. He also gives example of the invention of telephone.
In the invention of telephone the electromagnetic wave called
Hertzian wave js used in the telephone. The properties of the
Hertzian waves were not trully understood at that time when
nted by Graham Bell. So, it is evident
arch work may not be neces-
still equations in
This is from the le
world” by Erwin N. Griswo!
the telephone was invet
that the final results of the rese:
sary for the progress in human relationship.
Annotate the following
hope that you, and many others,
For the sake of all of us,
(June, 1999)
can goon much farther.
This is the concluding line of the article by Erwin N.
Griswold in the lesson “Educating lawyers for a changin
world”. The author encourages Dean storey of Southwe .
em Legal Foundation for more research works on la} na
legal relationship. He envisions that Dean Storey san go “
n
much farther in the field of law and legal relationship.
tok KK
fB
Scanned with anscannet64 English -!
Annotations 5 thlesson
} 4. Annotate the following
‘Talking about newspapers " said Mr. Beran,
this Most people turn first of all to the police reports.
from the lesson [Link] VER-
ek. The author talks about news items
what I think is
These lines are
DICT” by Karel Caps
in newspapers. [Link], says that most people look for
police reports in the newspaper. He sayS further that itis
hard to say whether people are keenon reading these news
suppressed desire to col
crease their knowledge
items because ofa mmit crime or
for their moral satisfication and to in
of law.
2. Annotate the following
I know all about it, pecause | used 10 share diggings with a
police-news reporter,
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT" by
Karel Capek. [Link] says that he knows that he himself
shares diggings with a police-news reporter. This news giver,
_ Haviena, fond of drinks and he was a lazy person. The
X police-news reporters informed [Link] that this person
was a law school drop-out and was fond of giving imagine
tive news to the police-news reporters.
‘Seannad th CamscannerLesson - 5 65
3, Annotate the following
This loafer was quite well up in criminal or legal matters.
(Dec., 2009)
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. [Link] informs us that the press reporters
approach Havlena, a loafer and get imaginary news from
him. [Link] knew that Haviena was interested in legal
matters and he gave news for cigars and some beer. He
would close his eyes and begin to give details of the finest
and strongest criminal cases that one could imagine.
4. Annotate the following
Then he'd open his eyes as if he had just woken up and
f grow! “lend me five crowns”. (Nov., 2008)
This is taken from the lesson “[Link]'S VER-
DICT’ by Karel Capek. Haviena would open his eyes, as if
he had just woken up and demanded five crowns for him
from the press reporters. Haviena imagined stories of crimi-
nal cases and passed judgments in the name of the Repub-
lic.
Annotate the following
At one sitting he invented twenty-one criminal cases each
‘one better than the one before it.
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT by
Karel Capek. Haviena invented twenty-one criminal cases
‘Seannad ith Camscanner66 . _ ————E
: and each case was better than the previcis
in one-sitting
one, These cases were
chief points in the defense and quote the public pt
6 sentence in the Narn,
strange and he would mention the,
fovecutor’s
speech in reply. Then he would pas
of the Republic.
6. Annotate the following
When the reporters discovered Havle
cases he supplied them with were not so hackneyed and duy
rts.
as those which actually came up before the cou!
This is taken from the lesson “[Link]'S VER.
porters approached
ina and saw that the
DICT” by Karel Capek. The news re|
Havlena because the news Haviena supplied to therm were
strange and interesting and the people actually develope
an interest in these police-news. People found these news
items were more interesting than those cases that actually
came up before the courts.
7. Annotate the following
Now one day Havlena thought out a case, which wasn't by
far one of his best.
This is from the lesson “[Link]’S VERDICT" by
to nee raven, who invented Police-news, one day
had a tov san sae case was like this An old bachelor
Pectable widow, So, he got a parrot
ili
‘Seannad ith Camscanner|
u esson 6
aed trained it to say insulting words whenever the lady ap-
peared on her balcony. This lady brought an action against
him for defamation of character. The court sentenced him
for fourteen days imprisonment and costs,
8. Annotate the following
“Eleven crowns and a cigar please”, said Haviena as a con-
clusion to the proceedings. (May, 2004)
This is taken from the lesson “[Link]’S VER-
DICT" by Karel Capek. Havlena imagined a case of an old
bachelor and a respectable widow. In this case, the old
bachelor insulted the lady by training a parrot to cry out abu-
sive words against her. Then he demanded eleven crowns
and a cigar, the fees for supplying this case to the police-
news reporters. »
Annotate the following
In another Landlord and Poor Widow’. (May, 2008)
This is from the lesson, “[Link]'S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. The police-news reporters reported the case
Supplied to them by Havlena in their newspaper under dif-
ferent captions. In one newspaper the reporter reported it
under the caption “Landlord and poor widow’.
‘Seannad ith Camscannero8
11.
Annotato the following
accordingly
) tho case.
"[Link]
ange c45'
aviena supplied a strange ©
w, and he also passed a sen-
old bachelor.
Tho Ministry of Justice
district court had doalt with ng VER-
This is taken from the jesson, cof
DICT" by Karel Capek, H
an old bachelor and a wido
tence of fourteen days imprisonment to a =
The newspapers reported this case under different
ings. This news item was brought to the notice of the ‘The
Ministry of Justice’. The Ministry of justice desired to know
which district court had dealt with the case.
Annotate the following
‘Good Lord, Haviena you haven't half landed us in a mess,
the reporters protested to their retailer.
This is from the lesson “[Link]’S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. The news reporters protested to Haviena and
asked him that he had landed them in a trouble. The Minis-
try of Justice asked them to inform it, the district court that
had dealt with this case. But the newspaper reporters did
not inform Havlena that the Ministry of Justice had asked
the reporters about this case and that it was the routine
work of the ministry of justice.
‘Scanned ith CamscannerLesson - 5
12.
13.
69
Annotate the following
‘Look here, that sentence you pass
legal.
sed in the parrot case is
(June, 2009)
This ts from the lesson, "MR HAVLENA'S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. The Newspaper reporters informed Haviena
that the sentence he passed in the parrot case was illegal.
The pressmen informed Haviena that the ministry of justice
enquired his case and asked them which district court passed
the sentence.
Annotate the following
Holy Moses, the Ministry of Justice has got the check to tell
me that. (Dec., 2001 & Now. 2005)
This is from the lesson “MR HAVLENA'S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. Haviena got angry when the newspaper re-
Porters told him that his verdict was illegal. He asked them
how insulting the ministry of Justice was to him He was
much offended by the remarks of the Ministry of Justice
Annotate the following
J will show them whether my Verdict is legal or not. Lam not
going to take this lying down. (June, 2002)
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT by
Capek. Haviena, the man who gave imaginary crimi-
to the news reporters passed judgments to the
‘Seannad ith Camscanner70
15,
16.
english =|
cases,
| Seles whens cas nese ome
in
In one such imag! nelor Who
: a
. against an old P® ity of
trained his parrot to say abusive words. TH? ™
‘lustice told the reporters that the sentence Passed by
Havlena in this parrot case was illegal. 5% Haviena got
angry and shouted that he would show the ministry of Jus. |
tice who he was and whether his verdict was illegal OF not,
Havlena Passed sentence
Annotate the following
/am not going to give any more judgments. | must get
satisfaction first. (Nov. 2002)
This is from the lesson “[Link]’S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. Havlena, the person who supplied false sto-
ries of criminal cases to Police-news reporters, once he sup-
plied an imaginery case of an old bachelor and his parrot.
In this parrot case, Haviena Passed the sentence of four-
teen days imprisonment to the old bachelor. The reporters
reported this case in their newspapers. The ministry of Jus-
tice got the news item. The reporters informed this to
Havlena. Havlena got angry and shouted that he was not
going to give any more judgments and he had to get satis-
faction first.
Annotate the following
You see, | bought a parrot and taught it to say, “You slut!”
“You wicked old geezer!”.
‘Seannad ith CamScanner71
MRHAVLENA'S VERDICT by Karel Capek. Havlena was
the supplier of false stories of criminal cases and judgments
tothe newspapers. In one of such false news items, Havlena
supplied the case of parrot to the press reporters. The min-
istry of Justice made an enquiry about this parrot case, and
said the sentence passed by Havlena was illegal. Havlena
was angry and to prove his case he bought a parrot and
trained it to tell ‘You slut!’ ‘You wicked old geezer!’
47, Annotate the following
Itell you, it is easy enough to think out an offense like that,
but holy Moses, when it comes to committing it, that's a
very different thing.
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT” by
Karel Capek. Havlena was the supplier of false news items
to the press reporters. The press reporters met him regu-
larly and he supplied news to them. Havlena wanted to
\ prove the judgment passed by him in the “Parrot case” in
| the court. So, he bought a parrot and trained it to suit the
situation in his case. He met the press reporters and told
them it was easy enough to think out an offense butit was a
different thing to commit it.
‘Seannad ith Camscanner72 _
18. Annotate the following pilin’
In court he was quite the little gentleman. he nad? © aot
speech against himself. (June 2008" cp
HAVLENAS yerdie! hy
in te peat
This is from the lesson “MR
Karel Capek. Hi
case. He was drunk
made
nt to the cou
g quile the
aviena was broud!
unt he
but in the 61
a biting speed agi
parrot cast
rot
little gentleman. He
He made this speech
the press reporters.
to prove his
supplied to
Annotate the following
d his beard
decent ol
hear the parrot.
AVLENA'S VERDICT" by
d to the court in the
The
19.
id fellow stroke
The magistrate, quite a
(Nov. 2002)
and said that he would like t0
m the lesson “MR.H
summone'
old lady with his parrot.
and the insult was
This is fro
Karel Capek. Haviena was
parrot case of offending an
prosecutor decided that it was an offence
graceful. But the magistrate who was a decent old fel-
wanted to hear the parrot of Havlena.
the following
looked at him and yelled You slut!.
‘is from the :
oe [Link]'S VERDICT" by
a ee to bring his parrot to the
. rought the parrot and it shouted
‘Seannadith Camscanner21.
son- 5
73
at the lady clerk that she was a slut. The prosecutrix re-
fused to accept that the parrot actually insulted the old lady
in this ‘parrot case’. But suddenly the parrot looked at the
magistrate and shouted that he was a slut. So, the magis-
trate decided that the parrot did not shout at the old lady
it it shouted at whoever came near to it. Hence he
t him.
alone bu'
acquitted Havlena of the charges made agains'
Annotate the following
“That's a moot point’, said his worship.
(Nov. 2003 & Dec. 2006, Nov.,
“[Link]'S VERDICT” by
.d to bring his parrot to
his parrot in a
2010)
This is from the lesson
Karel Capek. Havlena was summonet
le appeared in the court with
erson whenever he opened
ded that the parrot shouted
nce he
the court. Hi
parrot shouted at the p
rate deci
| the persons it saw and he!
ge by Havlena
cage. The
the cage. So the magist!
the abusive words at all
acquitted Havlena. But the opening of the cat
was a moot point and it was not an unlawful intent.
Annotate the following
of appeal against the acquittal......- .
“and | beg to give notice
(May, 2000)
[Link]'S VERDICT’ by
tted in the ‘parrot case’.
nted conviction in
.s from the lesson “Ml
as acquil
tal and he wa’
This i
Karel Capek. Havliena wi
He did not expect the acquil
‘Seannad ith Camscanner74
23.
25.
- A notice
this case. So, he begged the court to give
against the acquittal.
Annotate the following
“Do you call that justice?” he would scream” 7 DICT” by
This is from the lesson “*[Link] arrot Cae’,
Karel Capek. Havlena was acquitted L decided tO ap-
but he did not accept this acquittal. so he at the press
peal against this verdict. He would eet that justice.
reporters and asked them whether they calle
Annotate the following _
ife bringin
even if | have to spend the rest of my life ging
justice.
actions, | am not fighting for my cause, but for ju
(Nov. 2004)
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT" by
Karel Capek. Havlena was acquitted in the ‘parrot case’.
But he wanted to appeal against this acquittal. So, he told
the person who met him that even if he had to spend the
rest of his life bringing actions. He added that he was not
fighting for his cause but for justice.
Annotate the following
out Mr Haviena has, once and for all, stopped supplying
police Nnews-reporters such Cases.
Scanned with anSeanner75
This is from the lesson “[Link]'S VERDICT’ by
were! capek. Havlena was acquitted in the ‘parrot case’.
vis appeal against this acquittal was dismissed. Havlena
yas angry with the judicial system immediately after his
appeal was dismissed. So, he stopped supplying police-
news reporters such false cases.
KKK K IK
‘Seannad ith CamcannerAnnotations
6 th lesson
1. Annotate the following
(Nov., 2003)
Many lawyers fail to attain full growth.
inctions of the law.
“The five ful
e author speaks about the
yer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. Th
five functions of the lawyer and many lawyers do not fulfil
their duties. Hence many lawyers fail to attain full growth,
They are not doing what they are expected to do in the legal
This is from the lesson
profession.
2. Annotate the following
Effective counseling necessarily involves a thorough-giving
knowledge of the principles of law as they appear in the
books and as they actually operate in action.
This is taken from the lesson “The five functions of the
lawyer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author says that a truly
great lawyer is a wise counselor. The lawyer should be @"
Scanned with anScanner81
¢ Counseliny
' éling ne
ives 2 thorough-giving knowledge of boven ine
cu t inci
they appear in the books and as they actual iples of law
“aly Operate in
ction.
Moe counsel
ao
annotate the following
Most difficult of all, truly great counseling calls for an abil
ability
to forecast the trends of the law. (N
lov., 2007)
This is from the lesson, “The five functions of the |
yer’ by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author says that the we
function of the lawyer is counseling. The lawyer should ad-
vise the public about the principles of law. The most difficult
part of counseling is to advise the public about the opera-
tion of law and he has to forecast the direction of the opera-
tion of the law in the court.
Annotate the following
This is what Mr Justice Holmes had in mind when he said,
“prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing
more pretentious, are what | mean by the law’.
This is taken from the lesson “The five functions of the
lawyer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. One of the five functions of
the lawyer was counseling. Lawyers should advise the pub-
lic about what the law will be at the time the problem under
discussion comes to court for adjudication. Mr Justice
‘Seannadth Camscannera2
: oes ould
sourts W'
Holmes said that the forecast about what the 6o¥
do was what he moant by law.
Annotate the following
to
js called on
Advocacy is tho most intensive work a lawyer
(Nov., 2008)
do.
“tho five functions of tho law-
that law-
yor" by Arthur T, Vandorbilt, The important work naw
yers should do is advocacy. He adds that he did “ lowe
the art of advocacy until he was fifty yoars old. A?
must study and master the art of advocacy.
This is from the lesson
Annotate the following
Advocacy is not a gift of the gods. (May, 2000)
This is from the lesson, “The five functions of the law-
yer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author says that the lawyer
should do advocacy and should be a wise counselor. Advo-
cacy involves several distinct arts each of which must be
studied and mastered. It can be mastered and it is not a gift
of the gods.
Annotate the following
itis in the courtroom that the law is applied to concrete facts
i PP
in specific cases, and itis the advocates who with the judges,
in the last analysis set the Course of the law.
This is tal
ken from the lesson “The five functions Of the
Ai
Scanned with ansSeanner6
yn
oss?
ayer by Arthur T: Vanderbilt. The author says that itis in
83
ne ourtroom that the law is applied to Specific cases, The
lawyer and the judges set the course of the law. So the
rawyers should have an experience as an advocate before
giving advise to the public.
Annotate the following
Every man owes some of his time to the up building of the
profession to which he belongs.
(Dec., 2001, Nov., 2002 & June, 2009)
This is from the lesson, “The five functions of the law-
yer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author quotes president
Theodore Roosevelt for improving the profession of the law-
yer. President Roosevelt remarked that every man owed
some of his time to the upbuilding of the profession to which
he belonged. So, the lawyers should devote some of their
own time for improving their profession. Thus president
Roosevelt distinguished a profession from a business.
Annotate the following
In our complicated age sound public opinion is more indis-
pensable than it ever was. (Nov., 2002)
This is from the lesson “The five functions of the law-
yer" by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author says that every
lawyer ina free society has a fourth responsibility. He should
act as an intelligent and unselfish leader of public opinion.
‘Seannad ith Camscanner11.
12.
nour compiles
a4
an it was ever befor
re
pat Hi
‘or adds
tial the
The autly
opinion is more ossen
p raurol froquenly turn
no followin
crown 0
(Doc., 2009)
Annotate ¢
it should have poon 4a
of thorns ?
10.
wha
out to be one
from tho 108807
5 of the lay,
phe five function
indorbilt. The author expl
says that the lawyer must b
e
He
ffice. He adds that the legal pro
O-
n of laurel but not ,
ains the fifth
This Is
yr by Arthur T. Ve
f the lawyer
ic of
Id be a crow!
ye
function
ared lo seek publ
prep
yer shoul
fession of a law)
thorn in his career.
Annotate the following
nture to say
st not engage in that debal
re no!
1 mu: te, but | do ve
that the law schools generally a doing what they Shouly
g to prepare their stude!
These lines are take from the lesso!
of the lawyer” by Arthur T. vanderbilt.
about the five functions of the lawyer.
schools generally are not doing what the!
to prepare their students for improving his
courts, and the law.
be doin, nts
n “The five functions
The author speaks
He adds that the law
y should be doing
profession, the
Annotate the following
Ifl had
my way, | would make it prescribed reading once
@
year for every judge.
‘Seannad ith Camcannerat 7. Vanderbill. In this context the author says
yor gpecch made by Dean Pound at the American Bar
qvoul ” on in 1906. He also wants to prescribe the intro-
va jo a this speech by Dean Wigmore. He asks the judges
duct | this introduction once a year.
10 1
notate the following
13. mr conference is an institution that is probably
us derstood than anything else in our procedural law.
nis ul
(Dec., 2006)
This is from the lesson “The five functions: of the law-
er’ bY Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author says pathetically
the pre-trial conference organized by a judge before
the trail is misunderstood in the procedural law that deals
with the regulation of legal activities. He also adds that
jaw's delay can be minimised by convening the pre-trial con-
ference.
14. Annotate the following
+] will take the matter under advisement”. (June, 2005)
This is from the lesson “The five functions of the law-
yer" by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. In explaining the laws delay in
giving final judgment, the author says that the delay is due
k to the delay in understanding the case by judges. After a
long trial a judge may say that he wants to have careful
‘Seannad ith Camscannereration of this case. So, h ke unde’
15.
16.
consid
advisement and this will cai
ing the judgment.
use a further delay in pronounc-
Annotate the following
If the judge does not decide the c@:
after oral argument he must indicate the reason on his weekly
(June, 2006)
se within twenty days
report.
a “The five functions of the law-
This is from the lesso’
me ways to
yer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author gives So!
avoid the delays in giving the final judgment. If there is 2
delay in finalising the case twenty days after the oral argu-
must indicate the reason for the delay on his weekly
ment he
defendant under-
report. This will make the plaintiff and the
stand the delay.
Annotate the following
Next to the law's delays, nothing irritates the public as much
as decisions based on technicalities of procedure and plead-
ing.
a (Nov., 2004, May 2011)
enue veo “The five functions of the lav”
ee a i ee The author explains how wé
adits @ case. The most irritating
irs tet tae can 6 Procedure and pleading. Thé
Procedure in the court rather i by making rules ¢
‘llowing a legislative code
‘Scanned ith Camscanner
1Lesson - 6
87
47. Annotate the following
18.
If there are judicial rules of procedure instead of a code,
they are‘not only likely to be better designed for litigation.
(June, 2001)
This is taken from the lesson, “The five functions of the
lawyer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author recommends
some procedures to prevent delays in giving judgment. He
recommends that the rules of procedure suitable to the liti-
gation should be designed to avoid delays in. judgment.
These rules should always contain a provision that these
rules are for the advancement of justice and the prevention
of delays. They also should contain a provision that if it
would work injustice it may be waived.
Annotate the following
Law is a business to which my life is devoted.
This is. from the lesson, “The five functions of the law-
yer” by Arthur T. Vanderbilt. The author concludes his pa-
per by saying that he wants to devote his life to improve the
legal profession. He adds that ifhe does not do what in him
lies to improve it that he does not actually doing service to
this profession.
Scanned with anSeannet_ ————
Annotations
1. Annotate the following
The need for comparing laws, practised only occasionally
until then and without meriting a special name, slowly be-
came more and more apparent.
This is from the lesson a “Comparative Law" by Rene
David and John E.C. Brierley. The authors explain the his-
tory of comparative law and inform us that the need for com.
paring laws of different nations did not arise till the end of
49th century. Until the beginning of the 20 century there
was no such expression as “Comparative law’ in legal stud-
ies.
Annotate the following
The success of comparati
jurists, after a period of natio!
characteristic of all sciences, which legal science
ve law is explained by the need of
nlism, to return to that univer-
salism, |
had enjoyed in the past.
This is from the lesson “Comparative Law” by Rene
David and John E.C. Brierley. The authors say that tne
success of comparative law takes law to the level of all sc
ences. All sciences are universal in character. The jurists
felt the need of comparative law only after a period of n&
Sooaent: The authors add that legal science had enjoy
universalism before the period of nationalism.
‘Scanned ith Camscanner- ————
1.
Annotations
, 7th lesson
Annotate the following
The need for comparing laws, practised only occasionally
until then and without meriting a special name, slowly be-
came more and more apparent.
This is from the lesson 7 “Comparative Law” by Rene
David and John E.C. Brierley. The authors explain the his-
tory of comparative law and inform us that the need for com.
paring laws of different nations did not arise till the end of
49th century. Until the beginning of the 20 century there
was no such expression as ‘Comparative law’ in legal stud-
ies.
Annotate the following
The success of comparati
jurists, after a period of natio!
characteristic of all sciences, which legal science
ve law is explained by the need of
nism, to return to that univer-
salism,
had enjoyed in the past.
This is from the lesson “Comparative Law” by Rene
David and John E.C. Brierley. The authors say that the
success of comparative law takes law to the level of all sc-
ences. All sciences are universal in character. The juriss
felt the need of comparative law only after a period of n&
tionalism. The authors add that legal science had enjoye
universalism before the period of nationalism.
‘Seannad ith Camscanner